Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher...

49
Conflict Resolution for Life Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR) Presented for the Central Illinois Volunteer Association All Rights Reserved (2013)

Transcript of Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher...

Page 1: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Conflict Resolution for Life

Rick OlshakAssociate Dean of Students, Illinois State University

Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Presented for the Central Illinois Volunteer AssociationAll Rights Reserved (2013)

Page 2: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

2

Conflict Resolution for Life

Presentation Outline

The Universal nature of conflict The structure of conflict How we should view conflict How we should manage conflict

Page 3: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

3

Conflict Resolution for Life

The Universal nature of conflict

What emotions do you experience in conflict situations at work? At home?

Page 4: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

4

Conflict Resolution for Life

The Universal nature of conflict

What feelings/emotions do you experience in conflict situations at work? At home?

Most people experience:

Anger Fear Frustration

Anxiety Hurt Helplessness

Confusion Loss Excitement

Page 5: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

5

Conflict Resolution for Life

The Universal nature of conflict

What relationships of value will we experience at work?

At home?

Work:

Co-workers Supervisors Supervisees

Clients Vendors Customers

Support Staff Regulators Management

Page 6: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

6

Conflict Resolution for Life

The Universal nature of conflict

What relationships of value will we experience at work?

At home?

Home:

Partner/Spouse Parents Children

Other Relatives Friends Neighbors

Community Service Providers Spiritual

Page 7: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

7

Conflict Resolution for Life

The Universal nature of conflict

Please note all of the relationships of value that will never experience conflict…

EVERY relationship of value experiences conflict

The most important relationships in our lives are those that also generate the most conflict

What is important is to develop a better understanding of conflict, and how it impacts our lives both in the work place and at home

Page 8: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

8

Conflict Resolution for Life

The structure of conflict

Let’s examine two perspectives on the structure of conflict:

PIN Model of Conflict PAV Model of Conflict

What we will finish this section with is an actual definition of conflict for use at work and at home

Page 9: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

9

Conflict Resolution for Life

The structure of conflict

The PIN Model of Conflict

Positions Interests Needs

Page 10: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

10

Conflict Resolution for Life

The structure of conflict

The PIN Model of Conflict

Positions

(what we say we want)

Interests(what we actually want)

Needs(what we must have)

Page 11: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

11

Conflict Resolution for Life

The structure of conflict

The PAV Model of Conflict

Perceptions Assumptions Values

Page 12: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

12

Conflict Resolution for Life

The structure of conflict

The PAV Model of Conflict

Perceptions How we see the world and how we see the other party (influenced

by our lens)

Page 13: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

13

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 14: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

14

Conflict Resolution for Life

The structure of conflict

The PAV Model of Conflict

Assumptions Judgments we make about people based on our perceptions of

them

Page 15: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

15

Conflict Resolution for Life

The structure of conflict

The PAV Model of Conflict

Values Our core beliefs about the world

Page 16: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

16

Conflict Resolution for Life

The structure of conflict

The PAV Model of Conflict

Perceptions Assumptions Values

Which of these is not negotiable?

VALUES

Therefore, we need to…

Page 17: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

17

Conflict Resolution for Life

The structure of conflict

Defining Conflict

CONFLICT is an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from others in achieving their goals. (Wilmot & Hocker)

Page 18: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 18

“Rick’s Conflict”

House versus Hawaii

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 19: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 19

Does this conflict meet the definition?

CONFLICT is an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from others in achieving their goals. (Wilmot & Hocker)

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 20: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

20

Conflict Resolution for Life

How we should view conflict

Page 21: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

21

Conflict Resolution for Life

How we should view conflict

Page 22: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

22

Conflict Resolution for Life

How we should view conflict

Page 23: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

23

Conflict Resolution for Life

How we should view conflict

Conflict is an inevitable part of every relationship of value Can be resolved so that both parties feel they have “won”

and without the need for someone to “lose.” Conflict signals a need for change, evolution, and/or

growth in a relationship Conflict can strengthen relationships rather than weaken

them

Page 24: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 24

Conflict Styles

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 25: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 25

Avoidance

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 26: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 26

Avoidance

Strategies:

Ignoring the problem/conflict Denial of the problem/conflict Evasion of the problem/conflict Joking about the problem/conflict

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 27: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 27

Avoidance

When to Practice:

When the issue or relationship is unimportant When there is no chance of a positive outcome When risks of confrontation outweigh benefits of resolution When other party has significantly greater power When one or more parties needs time to “cool down” When it is appropriate to let others resolve conflict

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 28: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 28

Avoidance

Disadvantages:

Decisions made by default/without input Issues likely to remain unresolved Loss of influence in a situation or relationship Leads to self-doubt and loss of self-esteem May be unable to deal with conflicts in the future Demonstrates a lack of caring/investment

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 29: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 29

Accommodation

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 30: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 30

Accommodation

Strategies:

Giving in or giving up Denying one’s own needs Placing harmony in the relationship over

the issues in conflict

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 31: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 31

Accommodation

When to Practice:

When one is wrong/other is right When there is a desire for harmony in the relationship When relationship is more important than the dispute When losses can be minimized When a party needs to “save face” When one wants leverage for future conflict

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 32: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 32

Accommodation

Disadvantages:

Requires party to give something up Issues likely to remain unresolved Does not generate creative solutions Can cause frustration and/or resentment Creates a loss of influence in situation/relationship Can damage relationships Can foster competition over “niceness”

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 33: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 33

Competition

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 34: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 34

Competition

Strategies: Hostile remarks or jokes Threats and/or coercion Denial of own responsibility Verbal arguments Physical altercations Covert actions

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 35: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 35

Competition

When to Practice:

When immediate and decisive action is necessary When the style will be rewarded When there is no relationship of value When the issue is more important than the relationship Where a party needs to prove commitment/strength When total victory is desired When competing can bring parties together/make both better

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 36: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 36

Competition

Disadvantages:

Strains/damages relationships Requires that one/both/all be “losers” in conflict Conflict may escalate Less likely to use constructive approaches later May encourage covert actions Can lead to stalemates Creates resentment and/or desire for revenge

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 37: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 37

Compromise

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 38: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 38

Compromise

Strategies:

Both parties give and take to find a “middle ground”

Offer a short-term resolution for “peace-keeping”

Appeals to fair play/fairness

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 39: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 39

Compromise

When to Practice:

When a temporary solution is needed When parties are of equal power When parties wish to save time and energy When doing so “seems fair” to all parties

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 40: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 40

Compromise

Disadvantages:

Often leaves underlying issues unresolved Issue may become a recurring problem Parties required to give something up One/both/all parties may not be completely satisfied Becomes an easy way out of creative conflict resolution Leads to “position padding”

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 41: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 41

Collaboration

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 42: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 42

Collaboration

Strategies: Open and honest dialogue that is positive and

constructive Willingness to listen to another view Emotions dealt with properly Seeking input from other party Willingness to accept responsibility for one’s

actions Giving ground without “giving in” (reason v.

compromise)

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 43: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 43

Collaboration

When to Practice:

When the relationship is important When a mutually satisfying outcome is sought When both views/sides are too important to compromise When underlying issues need to be addressed When one wants to avoid destructive means for handling

conflict When new and creative solutions are desired

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 44: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 44

Collaboration

Disadvantages:

Takes more time and energy Requires both parties to be committed to the process Makes a party appear unreasonable if he/she later decides

against collaboration A collaborative party may appear weak to an aggressive party

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 45: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

Image 45

“Rick’s Conflict”

House versus Hawaii

Let’s try: Avoidance Accommodation Competition Compromise Collaboration

Conflict Resolution for Life

Page 46: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

46

Conflict Resolution for Life

How we should manage conflict

Keys to successful conflict management:

Managing Conflict is a Choice

Listen, Listen, Listen  (SILENT = LISTEN)

Show you are listening (Restate) 

Avoid Poisons (name calling, exaggerations, comparisons, etc.)

Recognize power dynamics and know when to avoid, cool down, and/or involve appropriate third parties

Page 47: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

47

Conflict Resolution for Life

How we should manage conflict

Keys to successful conflict management:

Deal with strong emotions in a constructive way 

Know when each conflict style will be beneficial

Avoid Passive/Aggressive Behaviors 

Trust in yourself and the other person to resolve the conflict

Page 48: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

48

Conflict Resolution for Life

Final Reflection / Homework

One thing that I learned about conflict resolution today (or think differently now about) is…

I am best at handling conflicts that concern…

I am least effective at handling conflicts that concern…

  The most helpful skills I bring to conflict resolution are…

  My responses to conflict would be more effective if I…

Page 49: Rick Olshak Associate Dean of Students, Illinois State University Chair, National Center for Higher Education Risk Management – Conflict Resolution (NCHERM-CR)

49

Conflict Resolution for Life

For more information on this presentation or on conflict resolution, please contact me at [email protected] or visit my website at http://www.olshak.com

This Power Point presentation is already posted to my website.