Rice Varieties of NRRI · 2020-06-06 · Rice varieties are bred for higher yield and imparting...

Rice Varieties of NRRI ICAR - National Rice Research Institute68 1

H Pathak, C Parameswaran, HN Subudhi, SR Prabhukarthikeyan, SK Pradhan, A Anandan, MK Yadav, S Aravindan, G Guru Pirasanna Pandi, G Basana Gowda,

S Raghu, U Keerthana, K Sankari Meena, S Lenka, A Kumar and RK Sarkar

Rice�Varieties�of�NRRI:�Yield,�Quality,�Special�Traits�and�

Tolerance�to�Biotic�&�Abiotic�Stresses

ICAR-National�Rice�Research�InstituteIndian�Council�of�Agricultural�Research

Cuttack,�Odisha�753006

NRRI�Research�Bulletin�No.�20


CO

NTE

NTS

Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .04Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .05Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .061. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .072. Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .07 2.1 TraitanalysisofNRRIvarieties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .07 2.2 Bioticstressscreening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .07 2.3 Resistantstarchandglycemicindex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .08 2.4 Strawqualityparameters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .083. NRRIvarieties:Salientfeatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .08 3.1 No.ofvarietiesreleased . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .08 3.2 AreacoveredbyNRRIvarietiesinIndia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .09 3.3 PopularNRRIvarietiesinformalseedchain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 3.4 Ecology-wiseNRRIvarieties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 3.5 YieldtrendofNRRIvarieties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 3.6 Relationshipbetweenyieldandduration. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 3.7 Graintype,hulling,millingandheadricerecoveryofNRRIvarieties . . . . . . . . . . . .16 3.8 Kernallength,widthanditsratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 3.9 Alkalispreadvalueandwateruptake/100g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 3.10 ElongationRatio(ER),VolumeExpansionRatio(VER)and KernelLengthAfterCooking(KLAC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .194. ResponseofNRRIvarietiestobioticstresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 4.1 Blast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 4.2 Brownspot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 4.3 Sheathblight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 4.4 Bakanae. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 4.5 SeedlingBlight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 4.6 BrownPlantHopper. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 4.7 Gallmidge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 4.8 Rootknotnematode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22 4.9 MultiplebioticstresstolerantNRRIvarieties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .225. ResponseofNRRIvarietiestoabioticstresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 5.1 Submergence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 5.2 Stagnantflooding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 5.3 Hightemperature. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 5.4 Roottraits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .256. GrainqualityofNRRIvarieties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 6.1 Resistantstarchandglycemicindexanalysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25 6.2 Aromaticricevarieties. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .257. StrawqualityofNRRIricevarieties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 7.1 NeutralandAciddetergentfibrecontentofNRRIvarieties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 7.2 In-vitroorganicmatterdigestibilityandmetabolizableenergy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28 7.3 Nitrogenindrymatterandneutraldetergentfibrecontentofpaddystraw. . .288. Researchinsights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .299. Futurechallenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3010. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30Reference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31Annexure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .33

CorrectCitation

HPathak,CParameswaran,HNSubudhi,SRPrabhukarthikeyan,SK Pradhan, A Anandan, MK Yadav, S Aravindan, G GuruPirasanna Pandi, G Basana Gowda, S Raghu, U Keerthana,K Sankari Meena, S Lenka, A Kumar and RK Sarkar (2019).Rice Varieties of NRRI : Yield, Quality, Special Traits andTolerancetoBiotic&AbioticStresses.NRRIResearchBulletinNo.20,ICAR-NationalRiceResearchInstitute,Cuttack,Odisha753006,Indiapp68.

Publishedby

Dr.H.Pathak

Director

ICAR-NationalRiceResearchInstitute

Cuttack,Odisha753006,India

Coverpageandlayoutdesign

Mr.SunilKumarSinha

December2019

Disclaimer:ICAR-NationalRiceResearchInstituteisnotliablefor any loss arising due to improper interpretation of thescientificinformationprovidedinthebook.

PrintedinIndiabythePrint-TechOffsetPvt.Ltd.,Bhubaneswar,Odisha751024.


Rice varieties are bred for higher yield and imparting other unique traits for

tolerance/resistancetobioticandabioticstressesandsuperiorgrainquality.Thegrainyield

ofricevarietiesvariesindifferentregionsofIndia.EasternIndiashowsrelativelylessyield

due to predominant rain-fed cultivation. National Rice Research Institute (ICAR-NRRI),

Cuttack,Odishahasreleased139ricevarietiesincludingthreehybrids.Thepreviousanalysis

ofareacoveredbyNRRIvarietiesprovidedinsightsontheroleofNRRIvarietiesonnational

foodsecurity.ThepresentanalysisonthedifferenttraitsofNRRIvarietiesnamelyyieldtrend,

yield index, grain quality including glycemic index, resistant starch, straw quality and

response to biotic and abiotic stresses further complements the previous analysis and

providesadditionalinsightsinthephenotypicdiversityofNRRIvarieties.Forexample,NRRI

varietiesaremorepopularintherainfed,shallowlowlandandirrigatedecologies.Also,the

rateofincreaseintheyieldforNRRIvarieties(0.022tha year )issimilartothenational-1 -1

average.Ecologiessuchasirrigated,shallowlowlands,deepwatershowedincreasingtrend

inyieldoveryears.Further,varietiesnamelyShaktiman,Savitrishowedverylessglycemic

index.ThebioticstressresponseofNRRIvarietiesindicatespresenceofresistanceformajor

diseases and pests of rice. Straw quality analysis of NRRI varieties provides valuable

informationfortheutilizationofpaddystrawforvariouspurposes.Thus,thepresentbulletin

isnotonlyanaccountontheuniquetraitsofNRRIvarietiesbutalsoprovidesinsightsinthe

long-termobjectivesofresearchersthroughwhichvarietiesaredevelopedbytheinstitute.

Additionally,futureneedsofricefarmersespeciallyineasternIndiaaregoingtobeentirely

differentascomparedtothepreviousfewdecades.Inthisregard,integrationofthedata

obtained in the present analysis will greatly assist in �ine-tuning the objectives of

developmentofricevarietiestosuitthefarmers'need.

IsincerelyappreciatethescientistsofNRRI,Cuttackforbringingoutthistimely,valuable

document on the different traits of NRRI varieties and strongly believe the information

availableinthisresearchbulletinwillinspireandencouragericescientistsfordeveloping

highly pro�itable, climate-smart, consumer demand driven rice varieties catering to the

futureneedofricefarmersinourcountry.

(H.Pathak)

Foreword

ICAR-NationalRiceResearchInstitute(ICAR-NRRI),Cuttack,Odishahas

released139ricevarietiesincludingthreehybrids.Ourpreviousanalysis

oftotalriceareacoveredbyNRRIvarietiesshowedpopularityofNRRI

varietiesespecially inOdishaandWestBengal.Further, scientists from

different divisions individually analyzed theNRRI varieties for general

traits such as yield, ecologies, duration, grain related traits including

glycemic index, straw quality, biotic and abiotic stress responses.

Therefore, compilation of all the analyzed traits ofNRRI varietieswas

initiallyconceivedforbetterunderstandingofthephenotypicdiversityof

NRRIvarieties.Inthisregard,sevengeneraltraitsofNRRIvarieties,eleven

grain related traits including glycemic index and resistant starch, nine

biotic stresses, four abiotic stresses, yield trend analysis over years,

duration, ecologies, grain typeand strawqualitywereanalyzed in this

researchbulletin.Fortheanalysis,varietaltraitsdataofNRRIvarieties

were collected from the individual scientists and analyzed for mean

values, grouping into different phenotypic classes and tabulation was

doneforeachtraitsstudied.Further,datapointsfordifferenttraitswere

also veri�ied individually and pictorial representation for all the traits

analyzedwasmade.Further,basedonthebarchartsforthedifferenttraits,

preliminarydraftwaspreparedandextremevaluesoftraitswereremoved

from the analysis in preparing �inal draft. We request the readers to

initiallygothroughthechartsfordifferenttraitsinordertounderstandthe

generaltrendofNRRIvarietiesandannexurescanbereferredforspeci�ic

information.Wehopethatmostofthedataonthephenotypicdiversityof

theNRRIvarietiesprovidedbythescientistsareincludedinthisresearch

bulletin.

WegratefullyacknowledgeallthescientistsofNRRIforprovidingthedata

about NRRI varieties, without them the compilation of this research

bulletincouldnotbepossible.Wesincerelybelievethisresearchbulletin

provides insights to the rice scientists and could be very useful in

designing the breeding program for development of rice varieties in

future.

Authors

Preface

PR

EFA

CE

Dr.H.Pathak

Director


Rice varieties are bred for higher yield and imparting other unique traits for

tolerance/resistancetobioticandabioticstressesandsuperiorgrainquality.Thegrainyield

ofricevarietiesvariesindifferentregionsofIndia.EasternIndiashowsrelativelylessyield

due to predominant rain-fed cultivation. National Rice Research Institute (ICAR-NRRI),

Cuttack,Odishahasreleased139ricevarietiesincludingthreehybrids.Thepreviousanalysis

ofareacoveredbyNRRIvarietiesprovidedinsightsontheroleofNRRIvarietiesonnational

foodsecurity.ThepresentanalysisonthedifferenttraitsofNRRIvarietiesnamelyyieldtrend,

yield index, grain quality including glycemic index, resistant starch, straw quality and

response to biotic and abiotic stresses further complements the previous analysis and

providesadditionalinsightsinthephenotypicdiversityofNRRIvarieties.Forexample,NRRI

varietiesaremorepopularintherainfed,shallowlowlandandirrigatedecologies.Also,the

rateofincreaseintheyieldforNRRIvarieties(0.022tha year )issimilartothenational-1 -1

average.Ecologiessuchasirrigated,shallowlowlands,deepwatershowedincreasingtrend

inyieldoveryears.Further,varietiesnamelyShaktiman,Savitrishowedverylessglycemic

index.ThebioticstressresponseofNRRIvarietiesindicatespresenceofresistanceformajor

diseases and pests of rice. Straw quality analysis of NRRI varieties provides valuable

informationfortheutilizationofpaddystrawforvariouspurposes.Thus,thepresentbulletin

isnotonlyanaccountontheuniquetraitsofNRRIvarietiesbutalsoprovidesinsightsinthe

long-termobjectivesofresearchersthroughwhichvarietiesaredevelopedbytheinstitute.

Additionally,futureneedsofricefarmersespeciallyineasternIndiaaregoingtobeentirely

differentascomparedtothepreviousfewdecades.Inthisregard,integrationofthedata

obtained in the present analysis will greatly assist in �ine-tuning the objectives of

developmentofricevarietiestosuitthefarmers'need.

IsincerelyappreciatethescientistsofNRRI,Cuttackforbringingoutthistimely,valuable

document on the different traits of NRRI varieties and strongly believe the information

availableinthisresearchbulletinwillinspireandencouragericescientistsfordeveloping

highly pro�itable, climate-smart, consumer demand driven rice varieties catering to the

futureneedofricefarmersinourcountry.

(H.Pathak)

Foreword

ICAR-NationalRiceResearchInstitute(ICAR-NRRI),Cuttack,Odishahas

released139ricevarietiesincludingthreehybrids.Ourpreviousanalysis

oftotalriceareacoveredbyNRRIvarietiesshowedpopularityofNRRI

varietiesespecially inOdishaandWestBengal.Further, scientists from

different divisions individually analyzed theNRRI varieties for general

traits such as yield, ecologies, duration, grain related traits including

glycemic index, straw quality, biotic and abiotic stress responses.

Therefore, compilation of all the analyzed traits ofNRRI varietieswas

initiallyconceivedforbetterunderstandingofthephenotypicdiversityof

NRRIvarieties.Inthisregard,sevengeneraltraitsofNRRIvarieties,eleven

grain related traits including glycemic index and resistant starch, nine

biotic stresses, four abiotic stresses, yield trend analysis over years,

duration, ecologies, grain typeand strawqualitywereanalyzed in this

researchbulletin.Fortheanalysis,varietaltraitsdataofNRRIvarieties

were collected from the individual scientists and analyzed for mean

values, grouping into different phenotypic classes and tabulation was

doneforeachtraitsstudied.Further,datapointsfordifferenttraitswere

also veri�ied individually and pictorial representation for all the traits

analyzedwasmade.Further,basedonthebarchartsforthedifferenttraits,

preliminarydraftwaspreparedandextremevaluesoftraitswereremoved

from the analysis in preparing �inal draft. We request the readers to

initiallygothroughthechartsfordifferenttraitsinordertounderstandthe

generaltrendofNRRIvarietiesandannexurescanbereferredforspeci�ic

information.Wehopethatmostofthedataonthephenotypicdiversityof

theNRRIvarietiesprovidedbythescientistsareincludedinthisresearch

bulletin.

WegratefullyacknowledgeallthescientistsofNRRIforprovidingthedata

about NRRI varieties, without them the compilation of this research

bulletincouldnotbepossible.Wesincerelybelievethisresearchbulletin

provides insights to the rice scientists and could be very useful in

designing the breeding program for development of rice varieties in

future.

Authors

PrefaceP

RE

FAC

EDr.H.Pathak

Director


Summary1. IntroductionICAR-National Rice Research Institute (ICAR-NRRI), formerly known as Central Rice

Research Institute (CRRI), initiated the hybridization program for development of high

yieldingricevarietiesfrom1960onwards.Theinstitutehasreleasedthe�irstvariety�ifty

yearsbacknamedas'Padma'.Theinstitutehassofarreleased139ricevarietiesofdifferent

ecologiesincludingthreehybridsforcultivation.Thehighyielding,nitrogenresponsiverice

varietiesmadeIndiaself-suf�icientandvarietiesreleasedaftergreenrevolutionresultedin

�ive-foldincreaseinriceproduction.However,addressingthechallengesofricefarmingdue

toclimatechange,lowpro�itability,belowoptimumproductivityrequiresspecialeffortsto

sustain the food security in coming decades. Therefore, it is of prime importance to

understandthetraits,salientfeatures,andfarmer'spreferenceofreleasedNRRIvarietiesin

ordertostructurethebreedingprogramtomeettheupcomingchallenges.

2. Methodology2.1. TraitsanalysisofNRRIvarieties

The traits namely average yield, grain type, ecologies, durationwere collected forNRRI

releasedvarieties,analyzedformeanandgroupedintodistinctclassesforfurtheranalysis.

Linearregressionmodelwasusedforyieldtrendanalysisovertheyearsconsideringyearof

releaseofvarietyasafunctionofyieldofNRRIvarietiesbyusingthelinearequationy=ax+b,

whereyisyieldoftheNRRIvariety,xisyearofreleaseandbistheconstant.Similartrend

analysiswasalsoperformedfordifferenttraitssuchasduration,ecologies,andgraintype.

BreederseedindentforNRRIvarietiesweretakenfromtheannualreportofAICRIP-National

seedproject(crops),IndianInstituteofSeedScience,Mau(2017-18).Theareacoveredby

NRRIvarietieswastakenfromPathaketal.(2018).

2.2. Bioticstressscreening

RiceleafblastscreeningwasconductedatUniformBlastNursery(UBN),NRRI,Cuttack.Each

variety(30plantspertestentry)wasplantedin50cmlongrowsinnurserybedsatspacingof

10x10cm.Thesusceptiblechecks(HR12andCO39)weresowninborderlinesasspreader

rowsandaswellasafterevery�ivetestentriesforuniformspreadofthedisease.Diseasethreactionwasrecordedtwenty�ivedaysaftersowingandcontinuedupto40 dayaftersowing

orspreaderrowperchecksachieved85%ofthediseasesymptom(Susanetal,2018).Sheath

blightdiseasescreeningwasperformedbyarti�icial inoculationunder �ieldconditionby

inserting the sclerotia of virulent Rhizoctonia solani isolate. Arti�icial seed inoculation

methodwasusedforscreeningagainstbakanaediseaseasdescribedbyFiyazetal.(2014).

ThevirulentisolateofSclerotiumoryzaewasmassmultipliedinthesand-maizemedium,-1mixedwiththesterilizedpotsoil@15gkg ofsoilandutilizedforscreeningagainstseedling

blightdiseaseofrice.VarietalscreeningofBrownplanthopper(BPH)wascarriedoutasperSU

MM

AR

YICAR-NRRI, Cuttack has released 139 varieties so far including three

hybrids.NRRIvarietiesarepopularamongthefarmersineasternIndia

especiallyinthestatesofWestBengalandOdisha.Ourpreviousanalysis

showed that NRRI varieties cover an area of about 7.91Mha in India.

However, varietal traits, grain and straw quality and reaction of NRRI

varieties to biotic/abiotic stresses are not reported so far. Thus, the

presentresearchbulletinhighlightssevengeneraltraitsofNRRIvarieties,

elevengrainrelatedtraitsincludingglycemicindexandresistantstarch,

strawquality,ninebiotic stresses, fourabiotic stressesandyield trend

analysis for duration, ecologies and grain types over the years. The

analysis showed ~54.47% of NRRI varieties were released for two

ecologiesnamelyirrigatedandshallowlowlands.Themediumduration-1varieties(121-135days)providedhigheryield(>5tha )ascomparedto

longdurationNRRIvarieties.However,rateofincreaseintheyieldofNRRI-1 -1varietiesis0.022tha year overyearswhicharefoundtobesimilarto

nationalaverage.ThepredominantgraintypeofNRRIvarietiesismedium

and long slender. The varieties namely Sonamani, Swarna-Sub1,

Lunabarialshowedgreaterheadricerecovery,HUEandGeetanjalishowed

highergrainlengthandkernallengthaftercooking(KLAC),Shaktiman,

Savitri showed low glycemic index (<60). Further, response of NRRI

varietiestobioticandabioticstressesisalsohighlightedinthisbulletin.

ThevarietiesnamelySavitri,Panidhan,andSumitshowedresistanceto

blastduetopresenceofnineblastresistancegenes.Additionally,varieties

namelySarasa,Neela,NuaKalajeera,SwarnaSub1,PoornaBhogshowed

resistance to bakanae, and varieties Sarala, Hazaridhan, Satyakrishna,

Reetaweremoderatelyresistantforbrownspotdiseases.Similarly,Reeta

andLunasampadshowedmoderateresistancetoricerootknotnematode

andbrownplanthopper,respectively.VarietySamaleishowedresistance

togallmidge.Inparticular,popularvarietiesforshallowlowlandecologies

namelyPooja,Sarla,Gayatriwerealso foundtobe tolerant tostagnant

�looding(30cmwaterdepth).Further,paddystrawqualityanalysishas

identi�ied few varieties most suited for composting because of higher

nitrogencontentondrymatterbasis.Thus,thepresentbulletinprovides

comprehensiveinformationrelatedtothecharacteristicsofNRRIvarieties

alongwithgrain traits,whichwillbeuseful for the rice researchers in

designingthebreedingprogramforriceimprovement.


Summary1. IntroductionICAR-National Rice Research Institute (ICAR-NRRI), formerly known as Central Rice

Research Institute (CRRI), initiated the hybridization program for development of high

yieldingricevarietiesfrom1960onwards.Theinstitutehasreleasedthe�irstvariety�ifty

yearsbacknamedas'Padma'.Theinstitutehassofarreleased139ricevarietiesofdifferent

ecologiesincludingthreehybridsforcultivation.Thehighyielding,nitrogenresponsiverice

varietiesmadeIndiaself-suf�icientandvarietiesreleasedaftergreenrevolutionresultedin

�ive-foldincreaseinriceproduction.However,addressingthechallengesofricefarmingdue

toclimatechange,lowpro�itability,belowoptimumproductivityrequiresspecialeffortsto

sustain the food security in coming decades. Therefore, it is of prime importance to

understandthetraits,salientfeatures,andfarmer'spreferenceofreleasedNRRIvarietiesin

ordertostructurethebreedingprogramtomeettheupcomingchallenges.

2. Methodology2.1. TraitsanalysisofNRRIvarieties

The traits namely average yield, grain type, ecologies, durationwere collected forNRRI

releasedvarieties,analyzedformeanandgroupedintodistinctclassesforfurtheranalysis.

Linearregressionmodelwasusedforyieldtrendanalysisovertheyearsconsideringyearof

releaseofvarietyasafunctionofyieldofNRRIvarietiesbyusingthelinearequationy=ax+b,

whereyisyieldoftheNRRIvariety,xisyearofreleaseandbistheconstant.Similartrend

analysiswasalsoperformedfordifferenttraitssuchasduration,ecologies,andgraintype.

BreederseedindentforNRRIvarietiesweretakenfromtheannualreportofAICRIP-National

seedproject(crops),IndianInstituteofSeedScience,Mau(2017-18).Theareacoveredby

NRRIvarietieswastakenfromPathaketal.(2018).

2.2. Bioticstressscreening

RiceleafblastscreeningwasconductedatUniformBlastNursery(UBN),NRRI,Cuttack.Each

variety(30plantspertestentry)wasplantedin50cmlongrowsinnurserybedsatspacingof

10x10cm.Thesusceptiblechecks(HR12andCO39)weresowninborderlinesasspreader

rowsandaswellasafterevery�ivetestentriesforuniformspreadofthedisease.Diseasethreactionwasrecordedtwenty�ivedaysaftersowingandcontinuedupto40 dayaftersowing

orspreaderrowperchecksachieved85%ofthediseasesymptom(Susanetal,2018).Sheath

blightdiseasescreeningwasperformedbyarti�icial inoculationunder �ieldconditionby

inserting the sclerotia of virulent Rhizoctonia solani isolate. Arti�icial seed inoculation

methodwasusedforscreeningagainstbakanaediseaseasdescribedbyFiyazetal.(2014).

ThevirulentisolateofSclerotiumoryzaewasmassmultipliedinthesand-maizemedium,-1mixedwiththesterilizedpotsoil@15gkg ofsoilandutilizedforscreeningagainstseedling

blightdiseaseofrice.VarietalscreeningofBrownplanthopper(BPH)wascarriedoutasperSU

MM

AR

Y

ICAR-NRRI, Cuttack has released 139 varieties so far including three

hybrids.NRRIvarietiesarepopularamongthefarmersineasternIndia

especiallyinthestatesofWestBengalandOdisha.Ourpreviousanalysis

showed that NRRI varieties cover an area of about 7.91Mha in India.

However, varietal traits, grain and straw quality and reaction of NRRI

varieties to biotic/abiotic stresses are not reported so far. Thus, the

presentresearchbulletinhighlightssevengeneraltraitsofNRRIvarieties,

elevengrainrelatedtraitsincludingglycemicindexandresistantstarch,

strawquality,ninebiotic stresses, fourabiotic stressesandyield trend

analysis for duration, ecologies and grain types over the years. The

analysis showed ~54.47% of NRRI varieties were released for two

ecologiesnamelyirrigatedandshallowlowlands.Themediumduration-1varieties(121-135days)providedhigheryield(>5tha )ascomparedto

longdurationNRRIvarieties.However,rateofincreaseintheyieldofNRRI-1 -1varietiesis0.022tha year overyearswhicharefoundtobesimilarto

nationalaverage.ThepredominantgraintypeofNRRIvarietiesismedium

and long slender. The varieties namely Sonamani, Swarna-Sub1,

Lunabarialshowedgreaterheadricerecovery,HUEandGeetanjalishowed

highergrainlengthandkernallengthaftercooking(KLAC),Shaktiman,

Savitri showed low glycemic index (<60). Further, response of NRRI

varietiestobioticandabioticstressesisalsohighlightedinthisbulletin.

ThevarietiesnamelySavitri,Panidhan,andSumitshowedresistanceto

blastduetopresenceofnineblastresistancegenes.Additionally,varieties

namelySarasa,Neela,NuaKalajeera,SwarnaSub1,PoornaBhogshowed

resistance to bakanae, and varieties Sarala, Hazaridhan, Satyakrishna,

Reetaweremoderatelyresistantforbrownspotdiseases.Similarly,Reeta

andLunasampadshowedmoderateresistancetoricerootknotnematode

andbrownplanthopper,respectively.VarietySamaleishowedresistance

togallmidge.Inparticular,popularvarietiesforshallowlowlandecologies

namelyPooja,Sarla,Gayatriwerealso foundtobe tolerant tostagnant

�looding(30cmwaterdepth).Further,paddystrawqualityanalysishas

identi�ied few varieties most suited for composting because of higher

nitrogencontentondrymatterbasis.Thus,thepresentbulletinprovides

comprehensiveinformationrelatedtothecharacteristicsofNRRIvarieties

alongwithgrain traits,whichwillbeuseful for the rice researchers in

designingthebreedingprogramforriceimprovement.


theprocedurefollowedbyAnonymousetal.(1975)andJenaetal.(2015).NRRIvarieties

wereevaluatedagainstricerootknotnematodebyreleasingaJ2pergofsoil.Thetestentries

werescreenedagainstgallmidgebiotypeGMB2ingreenhouseasperthestandardprotocols

(Vijayaetal.2006).

2.3. Resistantstarchandglycemicindexanalysis

ResistantstarchandglycemicindexofNRRIvarietieswasanalyzedasreportedbyKumaret

al.(2018).

2.4. Strawqualityparameters

NRRI varieties have been evaluated for different paddy straw qualities as reported by

Subudhietal.(2020).

3. NRRI varieties: Salient features3.1. No.ofNRRIvarieties

Theinstitutehasreleasedsofar139ricevarietiesincludingthreevarietieswereidenti�ied

forreleaseduring2019(Fig.1,AnnexureI).Inthelastnineyears,51varietieswerereleased

andarepreferredbythefarmersforcultivation.Recently,varietiesforhighproteinrice,high

zinc rice, andmultiplebiotic andabiotic stress tolerant varietieshavebeen released for

cultivationthroughbackcrossbreeding(Table1).Also,multipleMOUshavebeensignedwith

the private companies for marketing of NRRI varieties, in particular for three hybrids

developedintheinstitute.Thus,varietiesreleasedfromNRRIarebeingcultivatedbythe

farmersofeasternIndiaingeneral,andparticularlyinOdishaandWestBengal.

3.2. AreacoveredbyNRRIvarietiesinIndia

NRRIvarietiesarewidelygrown indifferentstatesof India (Fig.2) (Pathaketal.2018).

The major states growing NRRI varieties are West Bengal, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Uttar

Pradesh,Bihar,Jharkhand,andTamilNaduincludingfewotherstates.Thetotalareacovered

byNRRIvarietiesis7.91MhainIndia.ThetwostatesnamelyWestBengalandOdishacover

nearly50%areaofNRRIvarietiesinIndia.

Fig.1.NRRIvarietiesreleasedinthelast50years. Fig.2.AreaofNRRIvarietiesgrownindifferentstatesofIndia.

Table1.VarietiesofNRRIdevelopedusingmarkerassistedselection.

VarietyYearofrelease

EcologyGenes/QTLsintrogressed

1.Swarna-Sub1 2009 Floodprone,shallowlowland Sub1

2.ImprovedLalat 2012 Irrigated xa5,xa13,Xa21

3.ImprovedTapaswini 2012 Irrigated xa5,xa13,Xa21

4.CRDhan800 2016 Shallowlowland Sub1,xa5,xa13,Xa21

5.CRDhan801 2018 ShallowlowlandSub1,qDTY1.1,qDTY2.1,

qDTY3.1

6.CRDhan802 2018 Shallowlowland Sub1,qDTY1.1,qDTY2.1

6 7 79

15

5

8

12

16

29

25

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

No

. of

vari

e�e

s


3.3. PopularNRRIvarietiesinformalseedchain

ThebreederseedindentofNRRIvarietiesshows~54varietiesareinbreederseedchain.

During2017-18,majorvarietiesnamelySahbhagidhan,Swarna-Sub1,Pooja,CRDhan201,

Abhishek,Sarala,Naveenwereindentedthroughbreederseedindent(Fig.3).Thesevarieties

were grown in ecologies such as rainfed upland, �lood prone shallow lowland, shallow

lowland, aerobic, medium deep, irrigated, boro, deep water and irrigated conditions.

Moreover,varietyMaudamaniisspreadingthroughinformalseedchainespeciallybyfarmers

tofarmerstransferinOdisha.

3.4. Ecology-wiseNRRIvarieties

TheNRRIvarietiesareverypopularamongthefarmersofdifferentstatesinIndia.Amongthe

139 rice varieties released by NRRI, Cuttack, 20 varieties were released for upland, 49

varietieswerereleasedforirrigatedecology,28varietiesforshallowlowlands,21varieties

fordeep,semi-deepandmediumdeepecologies,6varietiesforcoastalsalinityecology,10

varieties for aerobic ecology and few varieties have been released for bunded-uplands,

rainfed,andboroecologiesinIndia(Fig.4).VarietiessuchasSahbhagidhan,Pooja,Naveen,

Shatabdi,andSavitriareverypopularamongthefarmersinIndia.Also,itisestimatedthat

NRRIvarietiesaregrowninanareaof7.9MhaandgeneratesagrossannualreturnsofRs.48,

643croresinIndia.

3.5. YieldtrendofNRRIvarieties

The average yield of NRRI varieties recorded in AICRIP trials were analyzed for

understandingthelong-termtrendintheyieldofNRRIvarieties.Thelinearregressioncurve-1foryieldoveryearshasshowedthatmeanyieldofthevarietieshasincreasedfrom3.5tha in

-11968to4.6tha in2018(Fig.5a).Eventhough,yieldofNRRIvarietieshasimprovedbyover-1 -1 -11tha ,buttherateofincreaseofmeanyieldofNRRIricevarietieswasonly0.022tha year .

Thereleaseofvarietiesindifferentecologiesespeciallyrainfeduplandandlowlandscouldbe

oneofthemajorreasonsforverylessyieldincreaseperyearduringthelast50years.Further,

ecosystem-wiseyieldtrendanalysisshowedthatvarietiesreleasedfordeepandmedium-

deepecologieshavethehighestyieldincreaseovertheyearsascomparedtootherecologies.

Additionally,varietiesofshallowlowlands,irrigatedanduplandecologiesshowedsimilar

trendofyieldincreaseandremainingecologiesshowedmoreorlessstableyieldincrease

overyears(Fig.5b).Similarly,yieldtrendwasalsoanalyzedforthedurationofvarietiesover

yearsindifferentecologies.Intheanalysis,longdurationvarietiesofdeepandsemi-deep

watershowedincreaseintheyield.Similarly,irrigated,aerobic,uplandvarietiesalsoshowed

increasedyieldtrendsforincreaseinthedurationofthevarieties.However,coastalsalinity,

shallowlowlandsandmedium-deepvarietiesshowedreducedyieldtrendsforincreasein

thedurationofthevarieties(Fig.5c).Additionally,graintypeofNRRIvarietieswerealso

analyzedforyieldtrendovertheyears.Intheanalysis,exceptforlongboldvarieties,long

slender,mediumslender,andshortboldshowedincreasingyieldtrendoveryears(Fig.5d).

Thus,yieldtrendanalysisindicatesdifferentbreedingeffortsarerequiredtoincreasethe

averageyieldofvarietiesforvariousecologies.

Fig.3.DemandofbreederseedofpopularNRRIvarieties.

Fig.4.Ecology-wisesuitabilityofNRRIvarieties.

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Bre

ed

er

see

d in

de

nt

(q)

48

28

20

10 8 7 6 6 4 2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

No

. of

vari

e�e

s


Fig.5a.YieldtrendofNRRIvarieties. Fig.5c.Duration-wiseyieldtrendofNRRIvarieties.

Fig.5b.Ecology-wiseyieldtrendofNRRIvarieties. Fig.5d.GraintypeandyieldtrendofNRRIvarieties.

y = 0.021x - 37.73R² = 0.143

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025

-1Y

ield

(t

ha

)

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

-1Y

ield

(t

ha

)

Shallow lowlands Aerobic Coastal -SalinityDeep Water Irrigated Medium -deepSemi-deep Upland Linear (Shallow lowlands)Linear (Deep Water) Linear (Irrigated) Linear (Medium-deep)Linear (Upland)

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

-1Y

ield

(t

ha

)

Shallow lowlands Aerobic Coastal-SalinityDeep-Water Irrigated Medium-deepSemi-deep Upland Linear (Shallow lowlands)Linear (Aerobic) Linear (Coastal-Salinity) Linear (Deep-Water)Linear (Irrigated) Linear (Medium-deep) Linear (Semi-deep)Linear (Upland)

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

-1Y

ield

(t

ha

)Long bold Long slender

Medium bold Medium Slender

Short bold Linear (Long slender)

Linear (Medium Slender) Linear (Short bold)


Fig.5a.YieldtrendofNRRIvarieties. Fig.5c.Duration-wiseyieldtrendofNRRIvarieties.

Fig.5b.Ecology-wiseyieldtrendofNRRIvarieties. Fig.5d.GraintypeandyieldtrendofNRRIvarieties.

y = 0.021x - 37.73R² = 0.143

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025

-1Y

ield

(t

ha

)

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

-1Y

ield

(t

ha

)

Shallow lowlands Aerobic Coastal -SalinityDeep Water Irrigated Medium -deepSemi-deep Upland Linear (Shallow lowlands)Linear (Deep Water) Linear (Irrigated) Linear (Medium-deep)Linear (Upland)

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

-1Y

ield

(t

ha

)

Shallow lowlands Aerobic Coastal-SalinityDeep-Water Irrigated Medium-deepSemi-deep Upland Linear (Shallow lowlands)Linear (Aerobic) Linear (Coastal-Salinity) Linear (Deep-Water)Linear (Irrigated) Linear (Medium-deep) Linear (Semi-deep)Linear (Upland)

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

-1Y

ield

(t

ha

)

Long bold Long slender

Medium bold Medium Slender

Short bold Linear (Long slender)

Linear (Medium Slender) Linear (Short bold)


3.6. Relationshipbetweenyieldandduration

Yield is a function ofmultiple traits. Crop duration is one of the important traitswhich

determine the yield of the varieties. The analysis in NRRI varieties showed increase in

durationfrom60to135daysalsoincreasedthemeanyieldofthevarieties(Fig.6a).However,

meanyieldreducedforvarietieswithdurationof136-170days.Thedecreaseintheyieldof

longdurationvarietiesmightbeduetoreleaseinadverseecologiesnamelyshallowlowland,-1coastalsaline,deepwaterecologies.Thehighestmeanyieldof4.78tha wasachievedfor

varieties of irrigated ecology (121-135 days). Further, linear regression for yield and

durationofNRRIvarietieswasfoundtobe,Y=0.011x+2.824,whereYistheyieldofthe

variety,xisthedurationofthevarietyand2.824istheregressionconstant(Fig.6b).The

linearequationwasusedtocalculatethedifferencebetweentheexpectedyieldandobserved

yieldforadurationofavariety.Thevarietiesshowinghighestyieldindexwasselectedfor

eachecologiesandgiven inTable2.Thehighest indexvalue indicatesvarieties showing

greateryieldfortherespectiveduration.

5

10

33

29 31

17

3.15

3.65

4.14

4.784.56

4.31

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

60-80 81-100 101-120 121-135 136-150 151-170Y

ield

(t/

ha)

No

. of

vari

e�e

s

No. of varie�es Yield

Fig.6a.DurationandyieldofNRRIvarieties.

Fig.6b.DurationandyieldrelationshipofNRRIvarieties.

y = 0.011x + 2.824R² = 0.116

2

3

4

5

6

7

60 80 100 120 140 160

Yie

ld (

t/h

a)

Dura�on (days)

Table2.Ecology-wiseyieldindexofNRRIvarieties.

*Allthevarietiesindeepwaterhasthedurationbetween160-162,thusanyNRRIvarietycanberecommended

Sl.No.

Variety Ecology Yield-1(tha )

Duration ExpectedYield

Yieldindex

1 Pyari(CRDhan200) Aerobic 4.5 120 4.1 0.3

2 CRDhan205(IET22737) Aerobic 4.1 110 4.0 0.1

3 Chandan(CRBoroDhan2) Boro 6.1 145 4.4 1.6

4 CRDhan601 Boro 5.6 160 4.5 1.0

5 PhalguniBundeduplandsandirrigated

4.2 117 4.1 0.1

6LunaShankhi(CRDhan405)

CoastalSaline 4.6 110 4.0 0.5

7 Lunishree CoastalSaline 4.7 145 4.4 0.3

8CRDhan507*(Prasant)

DeepWater 4.7 160 4.5 0.1

9 SwarnaSub1Floodproneshallowlowlands

5.2 145 4.4 0.7

10 CRDhan306(IET22084) Irrigated 6.2 125 4.1 2.0

11 Ajay(Hybrid) Irrigated 6.0 130 4.2 1.8

12 CRDhan309 Irrigated 5.8 115 4.0 1.7

13 Rajalaxmi(Hybrid) Irrigated 5.8 135 4.3 1.5

14 Khitish Irrigated 5.5 120 4.1 1.3

15 CRDhan311(Mukul) Irrigated 5.5 126 4.2 1.3

16 Naveen Irrigated 5.2 120 4.1 1.1

17 Gayatri MediumDeep 5.0 155 4.5 0.4

18 Sarala MediumDeep 4.7 150 4.4 0.2

19 CRDhan407Rainfedshallowlowland

5.0 150 4.4 0.5

20 CRDhan511 Semi-deep 5.0 160 4.5 0.4

21 CRDhan701(Hybrid) Shallowlowland 6.0 142 4.3 1.6

22 Reeta(CRDhan401) Shallowlowland 5.5 150 4.4 1.0

23 CRDhan802(Subhas) Shallowlowland 6.5 142 4.3 2.1

24 CRDhan800 Shallowlowland 5.7 140 4.3 1.3

25 Annada Upland 4.7 111 4.0 0.7

26 Tara Upland 4.5 100 3.9 0.5

27 Neela Upland 4.0 90 3.8 0.1


3.6. Relationshipbetweenyieldandduration

Yield is a function ofmultiple traits. Crop duration is one of the important traitswhich

determine the yield of the varieties. The analysis in NRRI varieties showed increase in

durationfrom60to135daysalsoincreasedthemeanyieldofthevarieties(Fig.6a).However,

meanyieldreducedforvarietieswithdurationof136-170days.Thedecreaseintheyieldof

longdurationvarietiesmightbeduetoreleaseinadverseecologiesnamelyshallowlowland,-1coastalsaline,deepwaterecologies.Thehighestmeanyieldof4.78tha wasachievedfor

varieties of irrigated ecology (121-135 days). Further, linear regression for yield and

durationofNRRIvarietieswasfoundtobe,Y=0.011x+2.824,whereYistheyieldofthe

variety,xisthedurationofthevarietyand2.824istheregressionconstant(Fig.6b).The

linearequationwasusedtocalculatethedifferencebetweentheexpectedyieldandobserved

yieldforadurationofavariety.Thevarietiesshowinghighestyieldindexwasselectedfor

eachecologiesandgiven inTable2.Thehighest indexvalue indicatesvarieties showing

greateryieldfortherespectiveduration.

5

10

33

29 31

17

3.15

3.65

4.14

4.784.56

4.31

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

60-80 81-100 101-120 121-135 136-150 151-170

Yie

ld (

t/h

a)

No

. of

vari

e�e

s

No. of varie�es Yield

Fig.6a.DurationandyieldofNRRIvarieties.

Fig.6b.DurationandyieldrelationshipofNRRIvarieties.

y = 0.011x + 2.824R² = 0.116

2

3

4

5

6

7

60 80 100 120 140 160

Yie

ld (

t/h

a)

Dura�on (days)

Table2.Ecology-wiseyieldindexofNRRIvarieties.

*Allthevarietiesindeepwaterhasthedurationbetween160-162,thusanyNRRIvarietycanberecommended

Sl.No.

Variety Ecology Yield-1(tha )

Duration ExpectedYield

Yieldindex

1 Pyari(CRDhan200) Aerobic 4.5 120 4.1 0.3

2 CRDhan205(IET22737) Aerobic 4.1 110 4.0 0.1

3 Chandan(CRBoroDhan2) Boro 6.1 145 4.4 1.6

4 CRDhan601 Boro 5.6 160 4.5 1.0

5 PhalguniBundeduplandsandirrigated

4.2 117 4.1 0.1

6LunaShankhi(CRDhan405)

CoastalSaline 4.6 110 4.0 0.5

7 Lunishree CoastalSaline 4.7 145 4.4 0.3

8CRDhan507*(Prasant)

DeepWater 4.7 160 4.5 0.1

9 SwarnaSub1Floodproneshallowlowlands

5.2 145 4.4 0.7

10 CRDhan306(IET22084) Irrigated 6.2 125 4.1 2.0

11 Ajay(Hybrid) Irrigated 6.0 130 4.2 1.8

12 CRDhan309 Irrigated 5.8 115 4.0 1.7

13 Rajalaxmi(Hybrid) Irrigated 5.8 135 4.3 1.5

14 Khitish Irrigated 5.5 120 4.1 1.3

15 CRDhan311(Mukul) Irrigated 5.5 126 4.2 1.3

16 Naveen Irrigated 5.2 120 4.1 1.1

17 Gayatri MediumDeep 5.0 155 4.5 0.4

18 Sarala MediumDeep 4.7 150 4.4 0.2

19 CRDhan407Rainfedshallowlowland

5.0 150 4.4 0.5

20 CRDhan511 Semi-deep 5.0 160 4.5 0.4

21 CRDhan701(Hybrid) Shallowlowland 6.0 142 4.3 1.6

22 Reeta(CRDhan401) Shallowlowland 5.5 150 4.4 1.0

23 CRDhan802(Subhas) Shallowlowland 6.5 142 4.3 2.1

24 CRDhan800 Shallowlowland 5.7 140 4.3 1.3

25 Annada Upland 4.7 111 4.0 0.7

26 Tara Upland 4.5 100 3.9 0.5

27 Neela Upland 4.0 90 3.8 0.1


3.7. Graintype,hulling,millingandheadricerecoveryofNRRIvarieties

Rice grain morphology is an important criterion for the preference of variety by the

consumers.Thespeci�ic requirementsof theconsumerschange fromplace toplace.The

majorityoftheNRRIvarietiesaremediumslender,followedbyshortboldandlongslender

(Fig.7,AnnexureII).Theleastnumberofvarietieshasmediumboldgaintype.Moreover,

morethan50%ofNRRIvarietiescompriseofmediumandlongslendergrains.

22

28

37

29

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Long Bold Long slender Medium Slender Short Bold Aroma�c Medium Bold

No

. of

vari

e�

es

Fig.7.GraintypeofNRRIvarieties.

Thevarietiesarebredconsideringtheyieldandtolerancetostresses.However,grainquality

isanimportanttraitformillersandconsumers.Accordingly,NRRIvarietiesareanalyzedfor

differentqualityparameterssuchashulling,millingandheadricerecovery(Fig.8).Themean

hulling,millingandheadricerecoveryforNRRIvarietiesare78.6%,66.75%and56.06%,

respectively.ThevarietiesnamelySonamani,LunabarialandTapaswinishowedHRRof>

66%,Dharitri,RadhiandGayatrishowedmillingpercentageof>70%.However,varieties

namelyKalyani-II,Kalinga-IIandDhalaHeerashowedverylessheadricerecovery.

3.8. Kernallength,widthanditsratio

Theconsumerpreferenceofricemostlydependsonthegrainquality,especiallygrainlength

andwidth.TheanalysisofNRRIvarietiesforkernellengthshowed~21varietieshasgrain

lengthof>6mm,whereasthemeangrainlengthofNRRIvarietiesis5.53mm.Similarly,the

meangrainwidthofNRRIvarietiesis2.08mmand60varietiesshowinggrainwidthofmore

than2mm(Fig.9).ThevarietiesnamelyHUE,Geetanjali,Poornabhog,Satyakrishnashowed

highergrainlengthtowidthratioof>3.4.

3.9. Alkalispreadvalueandwateruptake/100g

ThealkalispreadvalueofNRRIvarietiesvariedbetweenthreetoseven.30varietiesshowed

ASVofthree,41varietiesshowedASVof4,fourvarietiesshowedASVof5,seven varieties

showedASVof 6 and four varietiesnamelyTara, Chandan, PoornaBhog and Sudabahar

showedASVof7(Fig.10).Similarly,themeanvalueofwateruptakeforNRRIvarietieswas

foundtobe122.15ml/100gofgrain.Thevarietiesnamely,Tara,CRDhan201,Shaktiman,

CRDhan205,Sneha,andChandanshowedhigherwateruptakeof>200ml/100g.

Fig.8.Hulling,millingandheadricerecoveryofNRRIvarieties

Fig.9.Kernallength,kernelwidthanditsratioofNRRIvarieties.

303540455055606570

40455055606570758085

CR

Dh

an3

05

Swar

na

- Su

b1

Sneh

a

CR

Dh

an2

05

Kal

inga

-3

Van

apro

va

Pya

ri

CR

Dh

an3

06

CR

Dh

an2

01

Sah

abh

agi D

han

Tuls

i

An

nad

a

Poo

rna

Bh

og

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

Kam

esh

Haz

ari D

han

Dh

ala

Hee

ra

Sup

riya

Kal

inga

-2

Sata

bd

i

Sum

it

Han

sesw

ari

Son

aman

i

Ch

ard

han

Rad

hi

Tap

asw

ani

Du

rga

Swar

na

CR

-10

14

Pan

idh

an

CR

HR

-32

Poo

ja

Nee

la

Lala

t

Kh

ira

CR

dh

an-2

04

Saty

akri

shn

a

Ch

and

ram

a

Van

dan

a

Utk

alp

rava

Lun

asan

khi

CR

Dh

an6

01

Ab

his

ek

HR

R %

Hu

llin

g an

d m

illin

g %

Hulling% Milling% HRR

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

40455055606570758085

Ph

algu

ni

Kal

yan

i-2

Jala

mo

ni

An

jali

Lun

abar

ial

Nu

akal

ajee

ra

Lun

ish

ree

Kal

inga

-1

Lun

asu

varn

a

Kh

i�sh

Hu

e

Sa�

ari

Jaya

n�

Dh

an

Gay

atri

Aja

y(H

)

Swar

na

sub

-1

Var

shad

han

CR

-Dh

an2

02

Savi

tri

Sara

sa

Saty

abh

ama

Gee

tan

jali

Hee

ra

Pad

min

i

Ind

ira

Raj

alax

mi

Sam

ali

Sara

la

CR

Dh

an3

04

Ket

akijo

ha

Sak�

man

Mo

�

Ud

ay

Tap

asw

ani (

MA

S)

Ree

ta

Lun

a Sa

mp

ad

Sake

t-4

CR

Dh

an3

00

CR

Dh

an3

03

Tara

Rat

na

Dh

arit

ri

Sad

abah

ar

HR

R %

Hu

llin

g an

d m

illin

g %

Hulling% Milling% HRR

11.522.533.54

01234567

CR

Dh

an3

05

Swar

na-

Sub

1

Sneh

a

CR

Dh

an2

05

Kal

inga

-3

Van

apro

va

Pya

ri

CR

Dh

an3

06

CR

Dh

an2

01

Sah

abh

agi D

han

Tuls

i

An

nad

a

Poo

rna

Bh

og

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

Kam

esh

Haz

ari D

han

Dh

ala

Hee

ra

Sup

riya

Kal

inga

-2

Sata

bd

i

Sum

it

Han

sesw

ari

Son

aman

i

Ch

ard

han

Rad

hi

Tap

asw

ani

Du

rga

Swar

na

CR

-10

14

Pan

idh

an

CR

HR

-32

Poo

ja

Nee

la

Lala

t

Kh

ira

CR

dh

an-2

04

Saty

akri

shn

a

Ch

and

ram

a

Van

dan

a

Utk

alp

rava

Lun

asan

khi

CR

Dh

an6

01

Ab

his

ek Len

gth

to

wid

th r

a�o

Ke

rnal

len

gth

an

dw

idth

(mm

)

KL KW L/B

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

012345678

Ph

algu

ni

Kal

yan

i-2

Jala

mo

ni

An

jali

Lun

abar

ial

Nu

akal

ajee

ra

Lun

ish

ree

Kal

inga

-1

Lun

asu

varn

a

Kh

i�sh

Hu

e

Sa�

ari

Jaya

n�

Dh

an

Gay

atri

Aja

y(H

)

Swar

na

sub

-1

Var

shad

han

CR

-Dh

an2

02

Savi

tri

Sara

sa

Saty

abh

ama

Gee

tan

jali

Hee

ra

Pad

min

i

Ind

ira

Raj

alax

mi

Sam

ali

Sara

la

CR

Dh

an3

04

Ket

akijo

ha

Sak�

man

Mo

�

Ud

ay

Tap

asw

ani (

MA

S)

Ree

ta

Lun

a Sa

mp

ad

Sake

t-4

CR

Dh

an3

00

CR

Dh

an3

03

Tara

Rat

na

Dh

arit

ri

Sad

abah

ar

Len

gth

to

wid

th r

a�o

Ke

rnal

len

gth

an

dw

idth

(m

m)

KL KB L/B


12345678

50

100

150

200

250

300C

R D

han

30

5

Swar

na

- Su

b1

Sneh

a

CR

Dh

an2

05

Kal

inga

-3

Van

apro

va

Pya

ri

CR

Dh

an3

06

CR

Dh

an2

01

Sah

abh

agi D

han

Tuls

i

An

nad

a

Poo

rna

Bh

og

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

Kam

esh

Haz

ari D

han

Dh

ala

Hee

ra

Sup

riya

Kal

inga

-2

Sata

bd

i

Sum

it

Han

sesw

ari

Son

aman

i

Ch

ard

han

Rad

hi

Tap

asw

ani

Du

rga

Swar

na

CR

-10

14

Pan

idh

an

CR

HR

-32

Poo

ja

Nee

la

Lala

t

Kh

ira

CR

dh

an-2

04

Saty

akri

shn

a

Ch

and

ram

a

Van

dan

a

Utk

alp

rava

Lun

asan

khi

CR

Dh

an6

01

Ab

his

ek

ASV

WU

/10

0g

WU/100g ASV

12345678

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Ph

algu

ni

Kal

yan

i-2

Jala

mo

ni

An

jali

Lun

abar

ial

Nu

akal

ajee

ra

Lun

ish

ree

Kal

inga

-1

Lun

asu

varn

a

Kh

i�sh

Hu

e

Sa�

ari

Jaya

n�

Dh

an

Gay

atri

Aja

y(H

)

Swar

na

sub

-1

Var

shad

han

CR

-Dh

an2

02

Savi

tri

Sara

sa

Saty

abh

ama

Gee

tan

jali

Hee

ra

Pad

min

i

Ind

ira

Raj

alax

mi

Sam

ali

Sara

la

CR

Dh

an3

04

Ket

akijo

ha

Sak�

man

Mo

�

Ud

ay

Tap

asw

ani (

MA

S)

Ree

ta

Lun

a Sa

mp

ad

Sake

t-4

CR

Dh

an3

00

CR

Dh

an3

03

Tara

Rat

na

Dh

arit

ri

Sad

abah

ar

ASV

WU

/10

0g

WU/100g ASV

Fig.10.AlkalispreadvalueandwateruptakeofNRRIvarieties

Fig.11.Elongationratio(ER),Volumeexpansionratio(VER)andkernellengthaftercooking(KLAC)ofNRRIvarieties

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

0

1

2

3

4

5

CR

Dh

an3

05

Swar

na

- Su

b1

Sneh

a

CR

Dh

an2

05

Kal

inga

-3

Van

apro

va

Pya

ri

CR

Dh

an3

06

CR

Dh

an2

01

Sah

abh

agi D

han

Tuls

i

An

nad

a

Poo

rna

Bh

og

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

Kam

esh

Haz

ari D

han

Dh

ala

Hee

ra

Sup

riya

Kal

inga

-2

Sata

bd

i

Sum

it

Han

sesw

ari

Son

aman

i

Ch

ard

han

Rad

hi

Tap

asw

ani

Du

rga

Swar

na

CR

-10

14

Pan

idh

an

CR

HR

-32

Poo

ja

Nee

la

Lala

t

Kh

ira

CR

dh

an-2

04

Saty

akri

shn

a

Ch

and

ram

a

Van

dan

a

Utk

alp

rava

Lun

asan

khi

CR

Dh

an6

01

Ab

his

ek

KLA

C (

mm

)

ER a

nd

VER

ER VER KLAC

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

0

1

2

3

4

5

Ph

algu

ni

Kal

yan

i-2

Jala

mo

ni

An

jali

Lun

abar

ial

Nu

akal

ajee

ra

Lun

ish

ree

Kal

inga

-1

Lun

asu

varn

a

Kh

i�sh

Hu

e

Sa�

ari

Jaya

n�

Dh

an

Gay

atri

Aja

y(H

)

Swar

na

sub

-1

Var

shad

han

CR

-Dh

an2

02

Savi

tri

Sara

sa

Saty

abh

ama

Gee

tan

jali

Hee

ra

Pad

min

i

Ind

ira

Raj

alax

mi

Sam

ali

Sara

la

CR

Dh

an3

04

Ket

akijo

ha

Sak�

man

Mo

�

Ud

ay

Tap

asw

ani (

MA

S)

Ree

ta

Lun

a Sa

mp

ad

Sake

t-4

CR

Dh

an3

00

CR

Dh

an3

03

Tara

Rat

na

Dh

arit

ri

Sad

abah

ar

KLA

C (

mm

)

ER a

nd

VER

ER VER KLAC

3.10. Elongation ratio (ER), Volume expansion ratio (VER) and kernel length

aftercooking(KLAC)

ThemeanER,VER,andKLACofNRRIvarietiesare1.69,3.73,and9.34,respectively(Fig.11).

Elongationratioof17varietieswasfoundtobe>1.8.Volumeexpansionratioof11varieties

werefoundtobe≥4andKLACis>10in21varieties.Thevarietiesnamely,Geetanjali,HUE,

Heera,CRDhan305,Reeta,LunashankishowedhigherKLACvaluesascomparedtoother

varieties.Similarly,varietiesnamelySneha,CRDhan601,Indira,AbhishekshowedhigherER

ascomparedtoothervarieties.Phalguni,Sahbhagidhan,Abishek,CRDhan601,Ketekijoha

andCRDhan201showedhighervolumeexpansionratioascomparedtoothervarieties.

4. Response of NRRI varieties to biotic stresses4.1. Blast

EightyNRRIvarietieswereevaluatedforleafblastinUniformBlastNursery(UBN)atNRRI,

Cuttack. The disease reactionwas scored visually on a 0-9 scale following the Standard

Evaluation System (SES), IRRI (2013). Based on the screening scores against leaf blast,

nineteenvarieties(23.75%)werefoundhighlyresistant(Score0-3),twenty-onevarieties

(26.25%)weremoderately resistant (score4-5), and fourty varieties (50%)were found

susceptible(score6-9)(Fig.12,AnnexureIII).

4.2. Brownspot

Asetof102NRRIvarietieswereevaluatedagainstbrownspotdiseaseofrice.Basedonthe

screeningscores,seventeenvarieties(16.67%)werefoundmoderatelyresistant;fortynine

varieties (48.04%)weremoderately susceptible, and thirty six varieties (35.29%)were

foundhighlysusceptible(Fig.13,AnnexureIV).

4.3. Sheathblight

Ninety eightNRRI varietieswere arti�icially screened against sheath blight disease. The

resultsshowedthat9varietiesaremoderatelyresistant,7varietiesaretolerant,9varieties

aremoderatelytolerant,41varietiesaresusceptibleand32varietiesarehighlysusceptible.

However,noneofthevarietieswasfoundtoberesistanttosheathblightdisease(Fig.14,

AnnexureV).

0123456789

10

Saty

a K

rish

na

Imp

rove

d L

alat

Lun

a Sa

nkh

i

Saty

abh

ama

Imp

rove

d …

HU

E

Mau

dam

ani

Gee

tan

jali

Ch

and

ram

a

Nav

een

Tap

asw

ini

An

jali

Rat

na

CR

Dh

an 2

05

CR

Dh

an 2

02

CR

Dh

an 3

05

CR

Dh

an 2

01

CR

Dh

an 6

01

Sa�

ari

Sah

bh

agid

han

Ind

ira

Kal

yan

i-II

Sup

riya

Son

aman

i

CR

Dh

an 3

00

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

Nu

a D

hu

sara

CR

Dh

an 9

07

Mo

�

Ket

ekijo

ha

Lun

a B

aria

l

CR

Dh

an 5

01

Pan

idh

an

CR

10

14

Gay

atri

Savi

tri

Ree

ta

Sam

alei

Poo

ja

Swar

na

sub

-1

Dis

eas

e s

core

Fig.12.ResponseofNRRIvarietiestoleafblast.


12345678

50

100

150

200

250

300

CR

Dh

an3

05

Swar

na

- Su

b1

Sneh

a

CR

Dh

an2

05

Kal

inga

-3

Van

apro

va

Pya

ri

CR

Dh

an3

06

CR

Dh

an2

01

Sah

abh

agi D

han

Tuls

i

An

nad

a

Poo

rna

Bh

og

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

Kam

esh

Haz

ari D

han

Dh

ala

Hee

ra

Sup

riya

Kal

inga

-2

Sata

bd

i

Sum

it

Han

sesw

ari

Son

aman

i

Ch

ard

han

Rad

hi

Tap

asw

ani

Du

rga

Swar

na

CR

-10

14

Pan

idh

an

CR

HR

-32

Poo

ja

Nee

la

Lala

t

Kh

ira

CR

dh

an-2

04

Saty

akri

shn

a

Ch

and

ram

a

Van

dan

a

Utk

alp

rava

Lun

asan

khi

CR

Dh

an6

01

Ab

his

ek

ASV

WU

/10

0g

WU/100g ASV

12345678

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Ph

algu

ni

Kal

yan

i-2

Jala

mo

ni

An

jali

Lun

abar

ial

Nu

akal

ajee

ra

Lun

ish

ree

Kal

inga

-1

Lun

asu

varn

a

Kh

i�sh

Hu

e

Sa�

ari

Jaya

n�

Dh

an

Gay

atri

Aja

y(H

)

Swar

na

sub

-1

Var

shad

han

CR

-Dh

an2

02

Savi

tri

Sara

sa

Saty

abh

ama

Gee

tan

jali

Hee

ra

Pad

min

i

Ind

ira

Raj

alax

mi

Sam

ali

Sara

la

CR

Dh

an3

04

Ket

akijo

ha

Sak�

man

Mo

�

Ud

ay

Tap

asw

ani (

MA

S)

Ree

ta

Lun

a Sa

mp

ad

Sake

t-4

CR

Dh

an3

00

CR

Dh

an3

03

Tara

Rat

na

Dh

arit

ri

Sad

abah

ar

ASV

WU

/10

0g

WU/100g ASV

Fig.10.AlkalispreadvalueandwateruptakeofNRRIvarieties

Fig.11.Elongationratio(ER),Volumeexpansionratio(VER)andkernellengthaftercooking(KLAC)ofNRRIvarieties

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

0

1

2

3

4

5

CR

Dh

an3

05

Swar

na

- Su

b1

Sneh

a

CR

Dh

an2

05

Kal

inga

-3

Van

apro

va

Pya

ri

CR

Dh

an3

06

CR

Dh

an2

01

Sah

abh

agi D

han

Tuls

i

An

nad

a

Poo

rna

Bh

og

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

Kam

esh

Haz

ari D

han

Dh

ala

Hee

ra

Sup

riya

Kal

inga

-2

Sata

bd

i

Sum

it

Han

sesw

ari

Son

aman

i

Ch

ard

han

Rad

hi

Tap

asw

ani

Du

rga

Swar

na

CR

-10

14

Pan

idh

an

CR

HR

-32

Poo

ja

Nee

la

Lala

t

Kh

ira

CR

dh

an-2

04

Saty

akri

shn

a

Ch

and

ram

a

Van

dan

a

Utk

alp

rava

Lun

asan

khi

CR

Dh

an6

01

Ab

his

ek

KLA

C (

mm

)

ER a

nd

VER

ER VER KLAC

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

0

1

2

3

4

5

Ph

algu

ni

Kal

yan

i-2

Jala

mo

ni

An

jali

Lun

abar

ial

Nu

akal

ajee

ra

Lun

ish

ree

Kal

inga

-1

Lun

asu

varn

a

Kh

i�sh

Hu

e

Sa�

ari

Jaya

n�

Dh

an

Gay

atri

Aja

y(H

)

Swar

na

sub

-1

Var

shad

han

CR

-Dh

an2

02

Savi

tri

Sara

sa

Saty

abh

ama

Gee

tan

jali

Hee

ra

Pad

min

i

Ind

ira

Raj

alax

mi

Sam

ali

Sara

la

CR

Dh

an3

04

Ket

akijo

ha

Sak�

man

Mo

�

Ud

ay

Tap

asw

ani (

MA

S)

Ree

ta

Lun

a Sa

mp

ad

Sake

t-4

CR

Dh

an3

00

CR

Dh

an3

03

Tara

Rat

na

Dh

arit

ri

Sad

abah

ar

KLA

C (

mm

)

ER a

nd

VER

ER VER KLAC

3.10. Elongation ratio (ER), Volume expansion ratio (VER) and kernel length

aftercooking(KLAC)

ThemeanER,VER,andKLACofNRRIvarietiesare1.69,3.73,and9.34,respectively(Fig.11).

Elongationratioof17varietieswasfoundtobe>1.8.Volumeexpansionratioof11varieties

werefoundtobe≥4andKLACis>10in21varieties.Thevarietiesnamely,Geetanjali,HUE,

Heera,CRDhan305,Reeta,LunashankishowedhigherKLACvaluesascomparedtoother

varieties.Similarly,varietiesnamelySneha,CRDhan601,Indira,AbhishekshowedhigherER

ascomparedtoothervarieties.Phalguni,Sahbhagidhan,Abishek,CRDhan601,Ketekijoha

andCRDhan201showedhighervolumeexpansionratioascomparedtoothervarieties.

4. Response of NRRI varieties to biotic stresses4.1. Blast

EightyNRRIvarietieswereevaluatedforleafblastinUniformBlastNursery(UBN)atNRRI,

Cuttack. The disease reactionwas scored visually on a 0-9 scale following the Standard

Evaluation System (SES), IRRI (2013). Based on the screening scores against leaf blast,

nineteenvarieties(23.75%)werefoundhighlyresistant(Score0-3),twenty-onevarieties

(26.25%)weremoderately resistant (score4-5), and fourty varieties (50%)were found

susceptible(score6-9)(Fig.12,AnnexureIII).

4.2. Brownspot

Asetof102NRRIvarietieswereevaluatedagainstbrownspotdiseaseofrice.Basedonthe

screeningscores,seventeenvarieties(16.67%)werefoundmoderatelyresistant;fortynine

varieties (48.04%)weremoderately susceptible, and thirty six varieties (35.29%)were

foundhighlysusceptible(Fig.13,AnnexureIV).

4.3. Sheathblight

Ninety eightNRRI varietieswere arti�icially screened against sheath blight disease. The

resultsshowedthat9varietiesaremoderatelyresistant,7varietiesaretolerant,9varieties

aremoderatelytolerant,41varietiesaresusceptibleand32varietiesarehighlysusceptible.

However,noneofthevarietieswasfoundtoberesistanttosheathblightdisease(Fig.14,

AnnexureV).

0123456789

10

Saty

a K

rish

na

Imp

rove

d L

alat

Lun

a Sa

nkh

i

Saty

abh

ama

Imp

rove

d …

HU

E

Mau

dam

ani

Gee

tan

jali

Ch

and

ram

a

Nav

een

Tap

asw

ini

An

jali

Rat

na

CR

Dh

an 2

05

CR

Dh

an 2

02

CR

Dh

an 3

05

CR

Dh

an 2

01

CR

Dh

an 6

01

Sa�

ari

Sah

bh

agid

han

Ind

ira

Kal

yan

i-II

Sup

riya

Son

aman

i

CR

Dh

an 3

00

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

Nu

a D

hu

sara

CR

Dh

an 9

07

Mo

�

Ket

ekijo

ha

Lun

a B

aria

l

CR

Dh

an 5

01

Pan

idh

an

CR

10

14

Gay

atri

Savi

tri

Ree

ta

Sam

alei

Poo

ja

Swar

na

sub

-1

Dis

eas

e s

core

Fig.12.ResponseofNRRIvarietiestoleafblast.


Fig.13.ResponseofNRRIvarietiestobrownspot.

0123456789

10

Rat

na

Kal

inga

-I

Sup

riya

Sam

alei

Savi

tri/

Po

nm

ani

Kal

inga

-III

Nee

la

Ud

aya

CR

10

14

Hee

ra

Kal

yan

i-II

Mo

�

Pan

idh

an

Tula

si

Lun

ish

ree

Van

dan

a

Rad

hi

Tap

asw

ini

Sara

la

Shat

abd

i

Haz

arid

han

Ab

his

hek

Vir

end

er

Ket

ekijo

ha

Raj

alax

mi (

Hyb

rid

)

Var

shad

han

Nu

a ka

laje

era

Ch

and

an (

CR

Bo

ro …

Swar

na

Sub

1

Sah

bh

agid

han

Ree

ta (

CR

Dh

an 4

01

)

Lun

a Sa

mp

ad (

CR

CR

Dh

an 5

01

CR

Dh

an 6

01

Saty

abh

ama

(CR

…

Hu

e (

CR

Dh

an 3

01

)

Imp

rove

d T

apas

win

i

Poo

rna

Bh

og

( C

R …

Jaya

n�

Dh

an (

CR

Lun

a Sa

nkh

i ( C

R

CR

Dh

an 3

00

CR

Dh

an 3

05

CR

Dh

an 2

01

CR

Dh

an 5

05

CR

Dh

an 3

06

(IE

T

CR

Dh

an 2

06

CR

Dh

an 4

08

(C

hak

a

CR

Dh

an 4

09

CR

Dh

an 8

00

CR

Dh

an 3

11

(M

uku

l)

CR

Su

gan

dh

Dh

an 9

08

Dis

eas

e S

core

Fig.14.ResponseofNRRIvarietiesforsheathblight.

4.4. Bakanae

OnehundredandtwoNRRIreleasedvarietieswerescreenedagainstbakanaediseaseofrice.

Based on the screening results, the varietieswere categorized into highly resistant (6);

resistant(5);moderatelyresistant(25);moderatelysusceptible(10);susceptible(11)and

highly susceptible (45). The disease incidence was recorded between 1.50 to 100%.

Sadabaharrecordedminimumlevelofdiseaseincidence(1.50%)followedbySarasaandCR

Dhan311(3.5%)diseaseincidence(Fig.15,AnnexureVI).

Fig.15.ResponseofNRRIvarietiestobakanaedisease.

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Disease incidence (%) Mean Elonga�on(%)

4.5. Seedlingblight

Atotalof98varietieswereevaluatedagainstseedlingblightofricecausedbySclerotium

oryzae(Fig.16,AnnexureVII).Basedonthescreeningscore,98NRRIvarietiesweredivided

intohighlyresistant(6),resistant(17),moderatelyresistant(10),susceptible(27)andhighly

susceptible(38).

4.6. Brownplanthopper(BPH)

EightynineNRRIvarietieswerescreenedagainstbrownplanthopperinrice.Amongthem,

81varietieswerefoundtobehighlysusceptible;5varietieshaveshownsusceptiblereaction;

onevariety (Kalashree)wasmoderately susceptibleand twovarietieswere found(Luna

SampadandLunishree)tobemoderatelyresistant.Theminimumdeadplantpercentagewas

recordedinvarietyLunishree(29.09%).Moreover,twentyninevarietiesshowed100%dead

plants(Fig.17,AnnexureVIII).

012345678

Rat

na

Kal

inga

-I

Sup

riya

Sam

alei

Savi

tri/

Po

nm

ani

Kal

inga

-III

Nee

la

Ud

aya

CR

10

14

Gay

atri

Kal

yan

i-II

Mo

�

Pan

idh

an

Tula

si

Shak

�m

an

Sneh

a

Dh

ala

Hee

ra

Son

aman

i

Poo

ja

Du

rga

An

jali

Sad

abah

ar

Ch

and

ram

a

Gee

tan

jali

Nav

een

Aja

y (H

ybri

d)

Saty

a K

rish

na

…

Nu

a D

hu

sara

(C

R …

Han

sesw

ari(

CR

…

CR

Dh

an 4

0

Ph

algu

ni

Lun

a Su

varn

a …

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

CR

Dh

an 7

01

CR

Dh

an 5

00

Pya

ri (

CR

Dh

an …

Imp

rove

d L

alat

Sum

it (

CR

Dh

an …

Jala

man

i (C

R …

Lun

a B

aria

l (C

R …

CR

Sga

nd

h D

han

…

CR

Dh

an 3

03

CR

Dh

an 3

04

CR

Dh

an 2

02

CR

Dh

an 2

04

CR

Dh

an 2

05

…

CR

Dh

an 2

03

…

CR

Dh

an 3

07

…

CR

Dh

an 3

10

(IE

T …

Dis

eas

e S

core

Fig.16.ResponseofNRRIvarietiesforseedlingblight.

4.7. Gallmidge

Atotalof91NRRIreleasedvarietieswereevaluatedagainstricegallmidgeinglasshouse

condition.Amongthevarieties,87werehighlysusceptible,threevarietieswerefoundtobe

susceptibleandonlyonevariety(Samalei)wasfoundtobehighlyresistant.Therewasno

infestation in Samalei and twenty six varieties recorded 100% silver shoots (Fig. 18,

AnnexureIX).

Fig.17.ResponseofNRRIvarietiestobrownplanthopper.

2030405060708090100110

05

10152025303540

Rat

na

Kal

inga

-I

Sup

riya

Sam

alei

Savi

tri/

Po

nm

ani

Kal

inga

-III

Nee

la

Ud

aya

Gay

atri

Kal

ash

ree

Kh

ira

Pad

min

i

Tara

Van

apra

bh

a

Lun

ish

ree

Van

dan

a

Rad

hi

Poo

ja

Du

rga

An

jali

Sad

abah

ar

Ch

and

ram

a

Gee

tan

jali

Nav

een

Aja

y (H

ybri

d)

Saty

a K

rish

na

…

Nu

a D

hu

sara

…

Han

sesw

ari(

CR

…

Sah

bh

agid

han

Ree

ta (

CR

Dh

an …

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

CR

Dh

an 7

01

CR

Dh

an 5

00

Pya

ri (

CR

Dh

an …

Sum

it (

CR

Dh

an …

Jala

man

i (C

R …

Lun

a B

aria

l (C

R …

CR

Sga

nd

h D

han

…

CR

Dh

an 3

03

CR

Dh

an 3

04

CR

Dh

an 2

02

CR

Dh

an 2

04

CR

Dh

an 2

05

…

CR

Dh

an 2

06

…

CR

Dh

an 4

08

…

DP

%

TP a

nd

DP

TP DP DP%

0123456789

Ratn

a

Kali

nga

-I

Su

pri

ya

Ram

ak

rish

na

Satt

ari

Kh

itis

h

Utk

alp

rab

ha

Sara

sa

An

nad

a

Dh

ari

tri

Hee

ra

Moti

Pan

idh

an

Tu

lasi

Sh

ak

tim

an

Sn

eha

Dh

ala

Hee

ra

Son

am

an

i

Pooja

Du

rga

An

jali

Sad

ab

ah

ar

Ch

an

dra

ma

Gee

tan

jali

Navee

n

Aja

y (

Hyb

rid

)

Saty

a K

rish

na

Nu

a D

hu

sara

Han

sesw

ari

(C

CR

Dh

an

40

Ph

alg

un

i

Lu

na S

uvarn

a

Nu

a

CR

Dh

an

701

CR

Dh

an

500

Pyari

( C

R

Imp

roved

Lala

t

Su

mit

( C

R

Jala

man

i (C

R

Lu

na B

ari

al

CR

Sgan

dh

CR

Dh

an

303

CR

Dh

an

304

CR

Dh

an

202

CR

Dh

an

204

CR

Dh

an

205

CR

Dh

an

203

CR

Dh

an

307

CR

Dh

an

310

Dis

eas

e S

core


Fig.21.ResponseofNRRIvarietiestoeightdifferentbioticstresses

Table3.NRRIvarietiesresistanttomultiplebioticstresses.

Sl.No. Varieties Resistanceforbioticstresses

1 Chandrama Blast,Seedlingblight

2 CRDhan311(Mukul) SeedlingblightandBakanae

3 Khira SeedlingblightandBakanae

4 Lunishree Blast,Seedlingblight

5 Neela Falsesmut,Seedlingblight,Bakanae

6 Sadabahar SeedlingblightandBakanae

7 Samalei Gallmidge,Blast,Seedlingblight

8 Sarasa Blast,Seedlingblight,Bakanae

9 Savitri Blast,Seedlingblight

10 SwarnaSub1 Falsesmut,Bakanae,Seedlingblight

Fig.18.ResponseofNRRIvarietiestogallmidge.

0102030405060708090100

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Rat

na

Kal

inga

-I

Sup

riya

Sam

alei

Savi

tri/

Po

nm

ani

Kal

inga

-III

Nee

la

Ud

aya

Gay

atri

Kal

ash

ree

Kh

ira

Pad

min

i

Tara

Van

apra

bh

a

Lun

ish

ree

Van

dan

a

Rad

hi

Poo

ja

Du

rga

An

jali

Sad

abah

ar

Ch

and

ram

a

Gee

tan

jali

Nav

een

Aja

y (H

ybri

d)

Saty

a K

rish

na

(CR

Nu

a D

hu

sara

(C

R

Han

sesw

ari(

CR

Dh

an

Sah

bh

agid

han

Ree

ta (

CR

Dh

an 4

01

)

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

CR

Dh

an 7

01

CR

Dh

an 5

00

Pya

ri (

CR

Dh

an 2

00

)

Imp

rove

d L

alat

Sum

it (

CR

Dh

an 4

04

)

Jala

man

i (C

R D

han

50

3)

Lun

a B

aria

l (C

R D

han

…

CR

Sga

nd

h D

han

90

7

CR

Dh

an 3

03

CR

Dh

an 3

04

CR

Dh

an 2

02

CR

Dh

an 2

04

CR

Dh

an 2

05

(IE

T

CR

Dh

an 2

06

CR

Dh

an 4

08

(C

hak

a

Per

cent

age

infe

stat

ion

No.

of

pla

nts

an

dsi

lver

sh

oots

TP SS Percentage

4.8. RootknotNematode

Sixty six NRRI varieties were evaluated against rice root knot nematode (Meloidogyne

graminicola). Based on the gall index rating, two varietieswere found to bemoderately

resistant(Scale-2),fourteenvarietiesweremoderatelysusceptible(Scale-3),twentyeight

varieties were susceptible (Scale-4) and twenty two varieties were found to be highly

susceptible(Scale-5).ThemaximumgallperrootswasfoundinvarietyHeera(148.33)and

theminimumwasrecordedinCRDhan303(4.5)(Fig.19,AnnexureX).

4.9. MultiplebioticstresstolerantNRRIvarieties

TheresponseofNRRIvarietiestoeightbioticstresseswascomparedtoidentifythemultiple

bioticstressresistantvarieties.Theanalysisshowed51varietieswerefoundtoberesistant

to one biotic stress. Eight and two

varietieswerefoundtoberesistant

to two and three biotic stresses,

respectively (Table 3, Fig. 20).

Further, susceptible response was

identi�ied in themost of the NRRI

varieties (Fig.21). The identi�ied

multiple biotic stress tolerant rice

varietiescouldbeusedforthecrop

improvementprogram.

Fig.19.ResponseofNRRIvarietiestonematodes.

020406080

100120140160

No

. of

galls

/ro

ot

Fig.20.No.ofmultiplebioticstressresistantNRRIvarieties

51

8

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Single bio�c stress Two bio�c stress Three bio�c stress

No

. of

vari

e�

es

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

No

. o

f v

ari

etie

s

HS

S

MS

MR

R

HR


Fig.21.ResponseofNRRIvarietiestoeightdifferentbioticstresses

Table3.NRRIvarietiesresistanttomultiplebioticstresses.

Sl.No. Varieties Resistanceforbioticstresses

1 Chandrama Blast,Seedlingblight

2 CRDhan311(Mukul) SeedlingblightandBakanae

3 Khira SeedlingblightandBakanae

4 Lunishree Blast,Seedlingblight

5 Neela Falsesmut,Seedlingblight,Bakanae

6 Sadabahar SeedlingblightandBakanae

7 Samalei Gallmidge,Blast,Seedlingblight

8 Sarasa Blast,Seedlingblight,Bakanae

9 Savitri Blast,Seedlingblight

10 SwarnaSub1 Falsesmut,Bakanae,Seedlingblight

Fig.18.ResponseofNRRIvarietiestogallmidge.

0102030405060708090100

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Rat

na

Kal

inga

-I

Sup

riya

Sam

alei

Savi

tri/

Po

nm

ani

Kal

inga

-III

Nee

la

Ud

aya

Gay

atri

Kal

ash

ree

Kh

ira

Pad

min

i

Tara

Van

apra

bh

a

Lun

ish

ree

Van

dan

a

Rad

hi

Poo

ja

Du

rga

An

jali

Sad

abah

ar

Ch

and

ram

a

Gee

tan

jali

Nav

een

Aja

y (H

ybri

d)

Saty

a K

rish

na

(CR

Nu

a D

hu

sara

(C

R

Han

sesw

ari(

CR

Dh

an

Sah

bh

agid

han

Ree

ta (

CR

Dh

an 4

01

)

Nu

a C

hin

ikam

ini

CR

Dh

an 7

01

CR

Dh

an 5

00

Pya

ri (

CR

Dh

an 2

00

)

Imp

rove

d L

alat

Sum

it (

CR

Dh

an 4

04

)

Jala

man

i (C

R D

han

50

3)

Lun

a B

aria

l (C

R D

han

…

CR

Sga

nd

h D

han

90

7

CR

Dh

an 3

03

CR

Dh

an 3

04

CR

Dh

an 2

02

CR

Dh

an 2

04

CR

Dh

an 2

05

(IE

T

CR

Dh

an 2

06

CR

Dh

an 4

08

(C

hak

a

Per

cent

age

infe

stat

ion

No.

of

pla

nts

an

dsi

lver

sh

oots

TP SS Percentage

4.8. RootknotNematode

Sixty six NRRI varieties were evaluated against rice root knot nematode (Meloidogyne

graminicola). Based on the gall index rating, two varietieswere found to bemoderately

resistant(Scale-2),fourteenvarietiesweremoderatelysusceptible(Scale-3),twentyeight

varieties were susceptible (Scale-4) and twenty two varieties were found to be highly

susceptible(Scale-5).ThemaximumgallperrootswasfoundinvarietyHeera(148.33)and

theminimumwasrecordedinCRDhan303(4.5)(Fig.19,AnnexureX).

4.9. MultiplebioticstresstolerantNRRIvarieties

TheresponseofNRRIvarietiestoeightbioticstresseswascomparedtoidentifythemultiple

bioticstressresistantvarieties.Theanalysisshowed51varietieswerefoundtoberesistant

to one biotic stress. Eight and two

varietieswerefoundtoberesistant

to two and three biotic stresses,

respectively (Table 3, Fig. 20).

Further, susceptible response was

identi�ied in themost of the NRRI

varieties (Fig.21). The identi�ied

multiple biotic stress tolerant rice

varietiescouldbeusedforthecrop

improvementprogram.

Fig.19.ResponseofNRRIvarietiestonematodes.

020406080

100120140160

No

. of

galls

/ro

ot

Fig.20.No.ofmultiplebioticstressresistantNRRIvarieties

51

8

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Single bio�c stress Two bio�c stress Three bio�c stress

No

. of

vari

e�

es

0

20

40

60

80

100

120N

o.

of

va

riet

ies

HS

S

MS

MR

R

HR


5. Response of NRRI varieties to abiotic stress5.1. Submergence

SubmergenceisoneofthemajorabioticstressesineasternIndia.Theselected(40nos.)NRRI

varietieswereevaluatedforthetolerancetothesubmergencestress.Theanalysisshowed

excepttheSwarna-Sub1,remainingvarietieswasfoundtobesusceptibletosubmergence

stress.Inrecenttimes,varietalimprovementprograminNRRIgivesspecialemphasistothe

submergence tolerance and varieties CR Dhan 801, CR Dhan 802 have been developed.

Accordingly, several improved lines particularly in popular cultivars namely Pooja-Sub1,

Maudamani-Sub1, Pratikshya-Sub1, and LalatMAS-Sub1 for submergence tolerance have

beendevelopedandinadvancedstageoftesting.

5.2. Stagnant�looding

Stagnant�loodingalsosigni�icantlyreducestheyieldofthevarieties.TheNRRIvarietieswere

evaluated for stagnant �looding tolerance. Eight varieties were found to be tolerant to

stagnant�looding.Interestingly,popularNRRIvarietiessuchasPooja,Sarala,andGayatri

werefoundtohavestagnant�loodingtoleranceofupto30cmwaterdepth(Fig.22).Further

varieties namely Kalashree, Varshadhan, and Hansheswari showed stagnant �looding

toleranceofupto50-60cmofwaterdepth.Thus,newbreedinglinesforshallowlowlandscan

alsobescreenedforstagnant�loodingtoincreasetheyieldstability,especiallyforcultivation

inOdisha.

5.3. Hightemperature

Themeantemperatureisincreasingduetoclimatechangeindifferentpartsoftheworld.In

Odisha, dry season rice crop is highly susceptible tohigh temperature stressduring the

reproductive stage. The NRRI varieties were evaluated for spikelet sterility under high

temperaturestressthroughstaggeredsowing(Fig.23).Twentyonevarietiesshowedaverage

spikeletsterilityof~20%.VarietiesnamelyGeetanjali,Tapaswinin,CRDhan303showed

sterility ofmore than 25%. Further, the variety Lunasanki was found to bemoderately

toleranttohightemperaturestressin�ieldcondition.

Fig.22.Stagnant�loodingtoleranceofNRRIvarieties.

Fig.24.RootcharactersofaerobicNRRIvarieties.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Savit

ri

Gayat

ri

Pooja

Sara

la

Durga

Kalas

hree

Varsh

adhan

Hanse

swar

i

Wat

er

de

pth

(cm

)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Spik

elet

ste

rilit

y (h

eat

stre

ss, %

)

Fig.23.SpikeletsterilityofselectedNRRIvarietiesforhightemperature

stressin�ieldcondition.

5.4. Roottraits

The varieties released for the aerobic condition are speci�ically adapted for better root

growth.Thus,nineaerobicNRRIvarietieswasevaluatedfortherootlength,totalnumberof

rootsandnumberofrootsatthebaseduringseedlingstage(Fig.24).Theanalysisshowed

thatmeanrootlengthatseedlingstagewasfoundtobe~29cmwithmaximuminCRDhan

202. Similarly, maximum number of roots was recorded in CR Dhan 203 (60 roots per

seedling).Additionally,CRDhan206showedhighestnumberofrootsatthebaseperhillas

comparedtootheraerobicvarieties.

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

No

. of

roo

ts a

t b

ase

Ro

ot

len

gth

(cm

), n

o. o

f ro

ots

(n

os)

Root Length (cm) Total no. of roots No. of roots at base

6. Grain quality of NRRI varieties6.1. Resistantstarchandglycemicindexanalysis

TheglycemicindexofNRRIvarietieswerefoundtobeintherangeof57.5to76.39.Varieties

namelyShaktiman,Savitri,Supriya,andimprovedLalatshowedglycemicindexof<60with

meanglycemicindex(64.59)(Fig.25,AnnexureXI).Similarly,tenvarietiesshowedhigher

amountofresistantstarch(≤2)ascomparedtoothervarieties.Themeanvalueofresistant

starchforNRRIvarietiesis1.12.VarietiesnamelyGayatri,Kalashree,JayantiDhan,Swarna

MASarehavinghigherresistantstarch.

6.2. Aromaticricevarieties

NRRI has released so far ten aromatic rice varieties namely, Nuakalajeera, NuaDhusara,

NuaChinikamini,Ketekijoha,Geetanjali,PoornaBhog,CRSugandhDhan907,CRSugandh

Dhan908,CRSugandhDhan909,andCRSugandhDhan910.Thearomaticvarietieshave

beenreleasedfordifferentecologiessuchasirrigatedlate,shallowlowlands,andshallow

favorablelowlands.Further,durationofthearomaticvarietiesrangedbetween130-150days

according to the different ecologies. The yield of the aromatic varieties ranged from-13.0–5.0tha andrecentlyreleasedvarieties(CRSugandhDhan907,CRSugandhDhan908,

CR Sugandh Dhan 909, and CR Sugandh Dhan 910) showed relatively higher yield as

comparedtoearlierreleasedvarieties.


7. Straw quality of NRRI rice varieties Nowadays,ricestrawutilizationisbecomingoneoftheessentialresearchareasduestubble

burninginNorthernIndia.Thereareseveralpropertiesofpaddystrawnamelydrymatter,

nitrogendrymatter,ash,silica,�ibrecontent,metabolizableenergydeterminestheutilityof

the straw for different purposes such as mushroom cultivation, in-situ and ex-situ

decomposition.NRRIvarietieshavebeenevaluatedforninedifferentparametersreleatedto

strawquality(Table4).Theanalysisshowedthatdrymatterofthestrawwasfoundtobe

positively correlated with lignin content (Fig. 26). Similarly, in-vitro organic matter

digestabilitywasfoundtobepositivelycorrelatedwithtotalmetabolizableenergyofthe

straw.Nitrogencontentinthedrymatterofthestrawwasfoundtobepositivelycorrelated

withsilicacontentbutnegativelycorrelatedwiththeneutraldetergent�ibrecontentinthe

NRRIvarieties.VarietyAbhishekandAjaywasfoundtohavehigherin-vitroorganicmatter

digestability, nitrogen dry matter content, and least neutral detergent �ibre content.

Therefore,thesevarietiescanbeconsideredforin-situandex-situdecomposition.

7.1. Neutralandaciddetergent�ibrecontentofNRRIvarieties

Fibre content of the straw determines the organic decomposition rate of paddy straw.

Averageneutral�ibre(NDFDM),aciddetergent(ADFDM)andlignincontent(ADLDM)was

foundtobe66.18%,51.67%and4.53%,respectively(Fig.27).VarietiesnamelyPanidhan,

Table4.CorrelationofdifferentstrawrelatedtraitsofNRRIvarieties.

DM Ash NDM NDFDM ADFDM ADLDM Silica ME IVOMD

DM 1

Ash 0.0019385 1

NDM 0.1055189 0.5801693 1

NDFDM 0.0887412 -0.8030155 -0.6797367 1

ADFDM -0.1954939 0.351951 -0.123685 -0.0217486 1

ADLDM 0.7623904 0.0835959 0.292741 -0.0661183 0.0589385 1

Silica -0.2212919 0.811149 0.508814 -0.8064402 0.5661085 0.102609 1

ME 0.7026031 -0.3908603 -0.237553 0.3424616 -0.5820246 0.3549767 -0.6403228 1

IVOMD -0.1350044 -0.2419463 -0.2206995 0.2562043 -0.5847606 -0.4659074 -0.5837476 0.484338 1

DM-Drymatter,NDM-Nitrogencontentindrymatterbasis,NDFDM-Neutraldetergent�ibreondrymatterbasis,ADFDM-Aciddetergent�ibreondrymatterbasis,ADLDM-Aciddetergentligninondrymatterbasis,ME-Metabolizableenergy,IVOMD-In-vitroorganicmatterdigestability

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

in %

in %

NDFDM ADFDM ADLDM

Fig.26.DifferentdrymatterfractionofricestrawsofNRRIvarieties.(NDFDM-Neutraldetergent�ibreondrymatterbasis,ADFDM-Aciddetergent�ibre

ondrymatterbasis,ADLDM-Aciddetergentligninondrymatterbasis).

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

3035404550556065707580

Re

sist

ant

Star

ch (

%)

Gly

cem

ic in

dex

Glycemic index Resistant starch (%)

Fig.25.ResistantstarchandglycemicindexofNRRIvarieties.

Glycemic index Resistant starch (%)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

Re

sist

ant

Star

ch

Gly

cem

ic in

dex

Satyakrishna, Savitri and Reeta has higher neutral detergent �ibre content, Lunasanki,

Maudamanihashigheraciddetergent�ibrecontentandPyariandKhitishhashigherlignin

content.The�ibrecontentofpaddystrawwillbehighlyusefulforidenti�icationofgenotypes

suitablefordifferentmethodsofdecomposition.


Fig.27.Relationshipbetweenmetabolizableenergy(ME)andin-vitroorganicmatterdigestability(IVOMD)ofricestrawinNRRIvarieties.

y = 2.111x + 26.67R² = 0.234

29

31

33

35

37

39

41

43

45

4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00

IVO

MD

(%

)

ME (MJ/Kg DM)

7.2. In-vitroorganicmatterdigestibilityandmetabolizableenergy

In-vitroorganicmatterdigestabilityisthebestindicatorforpaddystrawdecomposition.The

relationshipbetweenthemetabolizableenergyandin-vitroorganicmatterdigestabilitywas

foundtobepositivelycorrelated(Fig.28)andshowedincreasingtrendinlinearregression

(Y=2.11x+26.67),whereY is theorganicmatterdigestabilityandx is themetabolizable

energyinthestraw.ThevarietiesnamelyNeela,Reeta,Varshadhan,Lunishree,andShatabdi

showedhigherin-vitroorganicmatterdigestabilityascomparedtootherNRRIvarieties.

y = -12.17x + 76.9R² = 0.462

55

57

59

61

63

65

67

69

71

73

75

0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30

ND

FDM

(%

)

NDM (%)

Fig.28.Relationshipbetweenneutraldetergent�ibrecontent(NDFDM)andnitrogenindrymatter(NDM)ofricestrawinNRRIvarieties.

7.3. Nitrogenindrymatterandneutraldetergent�ibrecontentofpaddystraw

The nitrogen dry matter (NDM) and neutral detergent �ibre content (NDFDM) was

negativelycorrelatedandregressiontrendwasalsofoundtobenegativewithR2valueof

0.462.VarietiesnamelyKalinga-II, Ajay,Neela,Anjali andRadhi showedhighernitrogen

contentbutlowerneutraldetergent�ibrecontent.Similarly,varietiesnamelyVarshadhan,

Utkalprava,UdayaandSupriyashowedhigher�ibrecontentascomparedtoothervarieties.

Thus,theanalysisprovidesvitalinformationforselectionofpaddystrawofNRRIreleased

varietiesfordifferentpurposes.

8. Research prioritiesICAR-NRRIhas released around139 rice varieties during the last 50 years. Thepresent

analysis showeddifferent varietal traits including grain quality and biotic/abiotic stress

response.Thisanalysisprovidesseveralresearchinsightswhichcouldbeconsideredforthe

developmentofthenewvarietiesinfuture.Theresearchinsightsandfutureprioritiesare

givenbelow.

Sl.No

NRRIAchievements Researchinsights Suggestions

1 NRRI has released 139 ricevarieties. MAS varieties forsubmergence, drought, andbacterialleafblighthavebeensuccessfullydeveloped

~10% of NRRI varietiesreleased after 2009 weredeveloped through markerassistedbackcrossbreeding

Efforts needs to be taken toincreaseMASvarietiesupto25%.Trait improvement throughintrogression of brown planthopper resistance genes intohighyieldingvarietiescouldbeconsidered

2 Intotal,54NRRIvarietiesareinformalseedchain

~20% of NRRI varieties inseed chain are having 5qt/yearbreederseedindent

Efforts should be made topromoteat least20%ofnewlyreleasedNRRIvarietiesinseedchain

3 NRRI varieties are releasedfor 10 different ecologies.Varieties such as Swarna-Sub1 and Shabhagidhan areverypopular for �loodproneshallowlowlands,andrainfeduplandecologies

Only 20% of varieties arer e l e a s e d f o r s h a l l o wlowlands

SincelargeareaineasternIndiacomesundershallowlowlands,more emphasis needs to begiven for varietal developmentinshallowlowlands

4 Yield trend analysis showedthat higher yield increaseover yearswas observed fordeep and medium-deep,followedbyirrigated,shallowlowlandanduplandecologies

Costa l -sa l in i ty, aerobicecosystem showed stagnantyieldoveryears

Y ie ld QTLs/genes can beintrogressed speci�ically forshallow lowlands, coastal-salinity, aerobic ecologies foryield improvement of NRRIvarieties

5 Increase indurationofNRRIvarieties increased yield forecologies namely semi-deep,deep-water,aerobic,irrigatedanduplandvarieties

Shallow lowland, coastalsalinity and medium-deepecologies showed oppositetrend for increase in theduration

6 37% of NRRI varieties areresistanttoatleastonebioticstress

~12% of NRRI varietiesshowed resistance to morethanonebioticstresses

The identi�ied varieties can beutilized as donors in cropimprovementprogram


9. Future challengesThevarietiesofNRRIhavecontributedsigni�icantlytothenationalfoodsecurity.However,

thereisaneedtorevisetheprioritiesofriceimprovementprogramduetoclimatechange,

�luctuatingmarketprice,reducedincomegainforthefarmers.Theimmediaterequirementis

toreplacethepopularricecultivarswithnewcultivarshavingmultipletolerancestobiotic

andabioticstresses.Additionally,rateofincreaseintheyieldoftheNRRIvarietiesisvery

smallandfollowsthesimilartrendofnationalaverage.Thus,greateremphasisneedstobe

giveninincreasingthefarmyieldofthericevarietiesbycombinationofconventionaland

molecular approaches. Moreover, increasing the pro�itability of rice cultivation requires

multi-prongedstrategyforenhancingtheinputuseef�iciency,andgrainquality.

10. ConclusionICAR-NRRIhasreleased139ricevarietiesincludingthreehybrids.Responseofvarietiesto

biotic/abioticstressesandgrainqualityprovide�irsthandinformationinstructuringtherice

improvementprogram.Additionally,analysisofdifferenttraitsofNRRIvarietiesprovidesan

importantlinkinunderstandingthepopularityofNRRIvarietiesamongthefarmers.Further,

integration of all these varietal information will provide vital clues about the major

bottlenecks in-terms of yield, quality and response to biotic/abiotic stresses. Thus, the

presentresearchbulletinonthevarioustraitsofNRRIvarietiescouldbehighlyusefulin

structuringthebreedingprogramforthefutureneedofthenation,especiallyfortherice

farmersineasternIndia.

ReferencesAnonymous(1975)InternationalRiceTestingProgramme.Preliminaryreportofthe�irst

internationalricebrownplanthoppernursery(IRBHN).InternationalRiceResearch

Institute,p7.

Fiyaz RA, Krishnan SG, Rajashekara H, Yadav AK, Bashyal BM, Bhowmick PK, Singh NK,

PrabhuKVandSinghAK(2014)Developmentofhighthroughputscreeningprotocol

and identi�ication of novel sources of resistance against bakanae disease of rice

(OryzasativaL.),IndianJournalGenetics74(4):414-422.

thIRRI (2013) Standard Evaluation System (SES) of Rice (Revised), 5 ed. Phillippines,

Manila.

JenaM,PandaRS,SahuRK,MukherjeeAKandDhuaU(2015)Evaluationofricegenotypesfor

rice brown plant hopper resistance through phenotypic reaction and genotypic

analysis.CropProtection78:119-126.

KumarA,SahooU,BaisakhaB,OkpaniOA,NgangkhamU,ParameswaranC,andSharmaSG

(2018)Resistantstarchcouldbedecisiveindeterminingtheglycemicindexofrice

cultivars.JournalofCerealScience79:348-353.

PathakH,PradhanSK,ParameswaranC,MondalB,JambhulkarNN,TripathiR,ChakrabortiM,

KumarGAK,SamalPandSahuRK(2018)ContributionsofNRRIRiceVarietiesto

NationalFoodSecurity.NRRIResearchBulletinNo.16,ICAR-NationalRiceResearch

Institute,Cuttack,Odisha,753006,India,p26+vi.

SubudhiHN,PrasadKVSV,RamakrishnaCH,RameswarPS,PathakH,RaviDandBlummelM

(2020)Geneticvariationforgrainyield,strawyieldandstrawqualitytraitsin132

diverse rice varieties released for different ecologies such as upland, lowland,

irrigatedandsalinityproneareasinIndia.FieldCropsResearch245:107626.

Susan A, YadavMK, Kar S, Aravindan S, NgangkhamU, Raghu S, Prabhukarthikeyan SR,

Keerthana U, Mukherjee SC, Salam JL, Adak T, Banerjee A and Rath PC (2018)

Molecularidenti�icationofblastresistancegenesinricelandracesfromnortheastern

India.PlantPathology,Doi:10.1111/ppa.12975.

VijayaLakshmiP,AmudhanS,HimabinduK,CheraluC,BenturJS(2006)Anewbiotypeofthe

AsianricegallmidgeOrseoliaoryzae characeterized fromWarangalpopulation in

AndhraPradesh,India.InternationalJournalofTropicalInsectScience26:207-211.

ZhangS,ChenZQ,LuL,YangXL,YuDZ(2006)Identi�icationonresistancetoU.virensofmain

ricevarietiesinHubeiprovince.AnhuiAgrilculturalScienceBulletin12(5):76-78.


ANNEXUREI.

Eco

logy,parentage,yield,reactiontopestandspecialch

aractersofricevarieties

releasedbyICAR-N

RRI,Cuttack

,Odisha.

Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)

Reactiontodiseasesandpests

andspecialch

aracters

1Pad

ma

Irrigated

CR28-25

(IET953)

T141/T

N1

1968

AllIn

dia

120

ShortBold

3-3.5

Moderatelyresistanttoallm

ajor

diseasesan

dpests

2Bala

Upland

CR42-38-

173(IET1916)

N22/T

N1

1970

Assam

,Bihar,O

disha,Uttar

Pradesh,W

estB

engal

105

ShortBold

3-3.5

Moderatelyresistanttobacterialleaf

bligh

t,stemborer,andhardtoth

resh

3Kiron

Irrigated

CR141--2-192

(IET3226)

CR42/C

R10

1970

WestB

engal

110

Med

ium

Slen

der

4Fieldtolerancetoallm

ajordiseases

andpests.

4Krishna

Irrigated

CR1-6

(IET1417)

GEB24/IR8

1970

Odisha

125

Med

ium

Slen

der

3-3.5

Resistanttobacterialleafbligh

tand

moderatelyresistanttostemborer,

suscep

tibletogallm

idge

5Ratna

Irrigated

CR44-11(IET

1411)

TMK6/IR8

1970

Odisha,Punjab,H

aryana

125

Long

Slen

der

5Moderatelyresistanttobacterialleaf

bligh

tandstemborer

6Vijaya

Irrigated

CR10-5437

(IET1879)

T90/IR8

1970

AndhraPradesh,Bihar,Gujarat,

Karnatak

a,Kerala,M

adhya

Pradesh,M

aharashtra,Odisha,

WestB

engal

135

Med

ium

Slen

der

3-3.5


tand

moderatelyresistanttostemborer,

suscep

tibletogallm

idge

7Saket-4

Irrigated

CR44-35

(IET1410)

TKM6/IR8

1971

UttarPradesh

115

Long

Slen

der

4Moderatelyresistan

ttobacterialblight,

greenleafhopperandstemborer

8Jayanti

Irrigated

CR10-4103

(IET1039)

T90/IR8

1973

Assam

,Bihar,O

disha,Uttar

Pradesh,W

estB

engal

135

Long

Slen

der

4Toleranttoblast

9Kalinga-I

Irrigated

CR126-33-

11(IET2969)

Dungh

ansali/

IR8

1973

Odisha

105

LongBold

4Su

scep

tibletoalldiseases

10

Kalinga-II

Irrigated

CR126-42-2

(IET3279)

Dungh

ansali/

IR8

1973

Odisha

100

LongBold

4Su

scep

tibletoalldiseases

11

Shak

tiIrrigated

CR93-4-2IET

3232)

CR55-13/IR8

1973

Odisha

135

ShortBold

5Resistantto

ricetungro

virus,

moderatelyresistanttosheathbligh

t,

greenleafhopperandgallm

idge

12

Supriya

Irrigated

CR36-148

(IET1530)

IR8/C

R1

1973

Odisha

125

Med

ium

Slen

der

4Moderatelyresistanttob

acterial

bligh

tandstemborer

13

Van

iIrrigated

CR12-178

(IET2255)

IR8/C

R1014

1975

Odisha

125

Long

Slen

der

4Moderatelyresistan

ttobacterialblight,

blastandresistan

ttoricetungrovirus

14

Naikichili

Irrigated

CR146-7027-

274(IET7848)

CR10-114/

CR115

1977

Tam

ilNad

u120

Long

Slen

der

4Resistancetoblast

15

Anam

ika

Shallow

lowlands

CR149-3244-

198(IET3257)

MNP36/

CR12/Pan

kaj

1979

WestBen

gal,Bihar,O

disha

andAssam

145-

150

LongBold;

4.25

Moderatelyresistan

ttobacterialblight,

blast,stemborer,an

driceleafhopper

Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)


andspecialch

aracters

16

Indira

Irrigated

CRM

UT587-4

(IET2412)

Tainan

3

mutant

1980

Odisha

125

Med

ium

Slen

der


acterial

bligh

t,blastandstemborer

17

Pallavi

Irrigated

CR214-52-102

(IET11708)

Jikkoku/Serup

kichel

1980

Odisha

125

Med

ium

Slen

der

4Resistanttobacterialbligh

t

18

Ram

akris

hna

Shallow

lowlands

CR44-122-1

(IET4155)

TKM6/IR8

1980

Odisha

130

Med

ium

Slen

der

4Resistanttob

acterialblightand

tolerancetogallm

idge.

19

Samalei

Shallow

lowlands

CR95-ORS-952-

1(IET3350)

Leaung152/

IR8

1980

Odisha

150

Long

Slen

der

4.0-

5.0

Resistanttogallm

idgeandblast

20

Sattari

Upland

CRM23-3241

(IET5750)

NSJ200/Padma-

Gam

mairradiate

1980

Odishaan

dW

estBen

gal

70

ShortBold

3Dwarf,escap

esdiseasesan

dpests

21

Naren

dra

-1Irrigated

CR110-173

(IET2233)

BellePatna/

IR8

1981

UttarPradesh

110

LongBold

4Tolerancetobacterialbligh

t

22

Savitri/

Ponman

iSh

allow

lowlands

CR210-1009

(IET5897)

Pan

kaj/

Jagannath

1982

Odishaan

dTam

ilNad

u150-

155

ShortBold

3.8

Semi-dwarf,moderatelyresistantto

bacterialbligh

tandsheathbligh

t

23

Khitish

Irrigated

CR156-5021-

207(IET4094)

Bulk1/C

R115

1982

WestB

engal

120

Long

Slen

der

5.5

Suitab

lefordryseason

24

CR138-

928

Irrigated

CR138-928

(IET4078)

Jaya/T

KM6

1983

Gujarat

120

Med

ium

Slen

der

4Semidwarf,m

oderatelyresistantto

bacterialblight,stem

borerandgallm

idge.

25

Kalinga-

III

Upland

CR237-1(IET

6802)

AC540/R

atna

1983

Odisha

80

Long

Slen

der

3.5

Coldto

leranceandresistanttobrown

spot

26

Utkalprab

ha

Med

ium

Deep

CR221-1030

(IET11184)

Waikyaku/

CR1014

1983

Odisha

155

Med

ium

Slen

der

4Fieldtolerancetom

ajorpestand

diseases.

27

Neela

Upland

CR404-56-1

(IET7317)

CR94-1512-

6/Ratna

1985

Odisha

90

Med

ium

Bold

4Dwarf,resistan

ttoricetungrovirus,gall

midge,moderatelyresistan

ttobrown

planthopper,w

hitebackplanthopper

28

Sarasa

Irrigated

CR407-19

(IET7315)

CR94-1512-

6/Ratna

1985

Odisha

120

Long

Slen

der

5Resistanttogallmidge,moderately

resistanttobrownplanthopper,rice

tungrovirus,andwhitebackplanthopper

29

Udaya

Irrigated

CR190-103

(IET6703)

CR129-118/

CR57-49-2

1985

Odisha

135

LongBold;

5.2

Semidwarf,resistanttob

acterial

blight,b

rownp

lanthopper,w

hite

backplanthopper,gallm

idge,green

leafhopper,andm

oderatelyresistant

toricetungrovirus.

30

Annad

aUpland

CR222-M

W

10(IET6223)

MTU15/

Waikyaku

1987

Odisha,MadhyaP

radesh

,Manip

ur,M

eghala

ya,

Nagalan

d,Goa

110-

112

ShortBold

4.75

Moderatelyresistanttob

lastand

stem

borer


Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)


andspecialch

aracters

31

CR1014

Med

ium

Deep

CR563-1014

T90/U

rang

Urangan

1988

Odisha

155

Med

ium

Slen

der

4Tall,moderatelyresistanttosheath

bligh

t,�ieldtolerancetoallotherpest

anddiseases

32

Dharitri

Shallow

lowlands

CR210-1017-

607(IET

6272)

Pan

kaj/

Jagannath

1988

WestBengal,O

disha,

Assam

,TripuraandMad

hya

Pradesh

145-

160

ShortBold

3.75-

4.5

Semidwarf,m


blast,bacterialbligh

t,stemboreran

d

gallmidge

33

Gayatri

Med

ium

Deep

CR210-1018

(IET8022)

Pan

kaj/

Jagannath

1988

Odisha

155

ShortBold

4.0-

6.0

Semidwarf,m


bacterialbligh

t,blast,andgallm

idge

34

Kalashree

Med

ium

Deep

CR260-292

(IET9043)

CR151-79/

CR1014

1988

Odisha

160

Med

ium

Slen

der

4Moderatelytoleranttoblastandgall

midge

35

Kalyani-II

Upland

CR66-36-4

(IET10970)

TN1

/CH4

5/

Rikku132/N

22

1988

Odisha

62

Med

ium

Slen

der

2.5-3

Resistanttoblast

36

Kshira

Irrigated

CR401-7(IET

7328)

Vijaya/CR94-

1512-6

1988

Odisha

135

Med

ium

Bold

4.5

Dwarf,resistanttoblast,ricetungro

virus,brownplanthopper,gallm

idge

andwhitebackplanth

opper

37

Moti

Shallow

lowlands

CR2

60-1

36-

321(IET9170)

CR151-79/

CR1014

1988

Odisha

145

Long

Slen

der

4.0-

4.5

Tall,resistan

ttob

last,ricetungro

virus,green

leafhopper

38

Pad

mini

Shallow

lowlands

CRM25(IET

10561)

CR1014

mutant

1988

Odisha

145

Med

ium

Slen

der

3.5-

4.0

Modera

telytolera

nttolodging,

resistan

ttobacterialbligh

t

39

Pan

idhan

Med

ium

Deep

CR260-30

(IET10222)

CR151-79/

CR1014

1988

Odisha

170

Med

ium

Slen

der

3.5-

4.0

Fieldtolerancetom

ajorpestsand

diseases

40

Tara

Upland

CR404-48

(IET9215)

CR94-1512-

6/CR1014

1988

Odisha

100

Med

ium

Bold

4.5

Dwarf,resistan

ttoblast,ricetungro

virus,green

leafhopper,andgallm

idge

41

Tulasi

Med

ium

Deep

CR260-171

(IET8548)

CR151-79/

CR1014

1988

Odisha

170

Med

ium

Slen

der

3.5-

4.0

Submergence

tolerance

and�ield

tolerancetomajorpestsanddiseases

42

Van

aprab

ha

Upland

CR289-1045-

16(IET9804)

ARC12422/

ARC12751

1988

Odisha

90

Long

Slen

der

3.5

Resistanttob

lastandricetungro

virus

43

Heera

Upland

CR544-1-2

(IET10973)

CR408-48/

CR289-1208

1988

Odisha

68

LongBold;

3Dwarf,resistanttogallm

idge

44

Shak

tima

nIrrigated

CR404-24(

IET7316)

CR94-1512-

6/Pusa-2-21

1990

Odisha

120

ShortBold

4Resistanttob

acterialleafblight,

greenleafhopperandgallm

idge

45

CR1002

Shallow

lowlands

CR213-1002

(IET5890)

CR70-80-2/

Pan

kaj

1992

Odisha,M

adhyaPradesh,

WestBen

agl,Bihar

145

ShortBold

4.75

Moderatelyresistanttosheathbligh

tan

dgreen

leafhopper

46

Lunishree

Coastal

Saline

CRM30(IET

10678)

NonasailGam

ma

irradiated

mutant

1992

Odisha

145

Long

Slen

der

4.75

Fieldtolerancetom

ajorpestsand

diseasesan

dtolerancetosalinity

Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)


andspecialch

aracters

47

Seem

aSh

allow

lowlands

CR211-1016

(IET8036)

Jagannath

NaturalC

rops

1992

Odisha

150

Med

ium

Slen

der

4.5

Resistancetoblast

48

Sneh

aUpland

RR19-2(IET

1148)

Annad

a/CR-

143-2-2

1992

Odisha

70

Long

Slen

der

3.5

Resistancetoblastandgundhibug

49

Van

dan

aUpland

CR357/

RR167-982

(IET12304)

C22/K

alakeri

1992

Bihar,O

disha

95

LongBold;

3.5

Moderatelyresistanttoblast

50

Dhala

Heera

Upland

CR544-1-3-4

(IET11411)

CR404-48/

CR289-1208

1996

Odisha

85

LongBold;

3.5

Resistancetoricetungrovirus,gall

midge,green

leafhopper,w

hiteback

planth

opperandblast

51

Rad

hi

Irrigated

CRM40(IET

12413)

Swarnap

rabha

mutant

1996

Odisha

120

LongBold;

4.5

Fieldtolerancetom

ajorpestsand

diseases

52

Sonam

ani

Coastal

saline

CR644(IET

11365)

Velkim

utant/

Mah

suri

1996

Odisha

155

LongBold;

4.5

Suscep

tibletoyellowstemborer

53

Tap

aswin

iIrrigated

CR333-6-1

(IET12168)

Jagannath/

Mah

suri

1996

Odisha

135

Med

ium

Slen

der

5Moderatelyresistanttobacterialleaf

bligh

tandwhitebackplanth

opper

54

Pooja

Shallow

lowlands

CR629-256

(IET12241)

Vijaya/T141

1999

Odisha,MadhyaP

radesh

,Assam

,Tripura,W

estB

engal

150

Med

ium

Slen

der

4.5

Resistanttoblastand�ieldtolerance

tomajorpestsanddiseases

55

Sarala

Med

ium

Deep

CR260-

77(IET-10279)

CR151/C

R

104

2000

Odisha

150

Med

ium

Slen

der

4.75

Non-lodgingan

dphotosensitive

56

Durga

Med

ium

Deep

CR683-123

(IET112383)

Pan

kaj/C

R

1014

2000

Odisha

155

Med

ium

Bold

4.3

Resistanttoricetungrovirus,and

suitab

leorlateplanting

57

Shatab

di

Irrigated

CR146-7027-

224(IET

4786)

CR10-114/

CR10-115

2000

WestBen

gal

110

Long

Slen

der

3.7


acterial

bligh

t,sheathbligh

t,sheathrotan

d

suitab

lefordryseason

58

Anjali

Upland

RR347-166

(IET16430)

Sneh

a/RR

149-1129

2002

UttarPradesh,B

ihar,

Jharkhan

d,A

ssam

,Tripura

95

ShortBold

3.5

Mod

eratelyresistanttoblast,w

hiteback

planthopper,gallm

idgeandleaffolder

59

Hazaridh

anIrrigated

CR314-5-10

(IET8707)

IR-42/IR

5853-118-5

2004

Jharkhan

d120

Long

Slen

der

3.7

Resistanttob

lastandm

oderately

resistan

ttobacterialleafbligh

t

60

Sadab

aha

rUpland

CR306-37-

13(IET10919)

BRRISA

IL/IR

10181-58-3-1

2004

Jharkhan

d105

LongBold;

3.5


t

61

Abhishek

Irrigated

RR272-89

(IET17868)

CR314-5-10

NaturalC

ross

2006

UttarPradesh,B

ihar,

Jharkhan

d,A

ssam

125

ShortBold

4.5-

5.0

Semidwarf,resistanttob

lastand

moderatelyresistanttobrownspot

andgallm

idge


Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)


andspecialch

aracters

62

Chan

dra

ma

Irrigated

Boro

CR386-2-

10(IET10419)

ARC6650/C

R

94-721

2006

Assam

130,

170

(Boro)

ShortBold

4.5

Resista

ntto

blast,m

odera

tely

resistan

ttobacterialleafbligh

t,rice

tungrovirus,sheathb

ligh

t,b

rown

planthopper,w

hitebackplanthopper,

gallmidgeand15daysofdorm

ancy

63

Viren

der

Upland

RR347-2(IET

17901)

Sneh

a/RR

149-1129

2006

Odisha,Gujarat

95

ShortBold

2.75

Resistanttobrownspot,gallmidge

andmoderatelyresistanttoblast

64

GeetanjaliIrrigated

CRM2007-

1(IET18987)

Basmati3

70

Mutant

2006

Odisha

130

Long

Slen

der

(aromatic)

4.5

Semi-dwarf,resistancetogallm

idge

65

Ketek

ijoh

aSh

allow

lowlands

IET18669

Savitri/B

adsh

abhog

2006

Odisha

145

Med

ium

Slen

der

(aromatic)

3.5

Moderatelyresistanttobacterialleaf

bligh

t,sheathbligh

t,stemboreran

d

gallmidge

66

Naveen

Irrigated

CR749-20-

2(IET1446)

Sattari/Jaya

2006

Odisha,Tripura,W

est

Ben

gal

120

Med

ium

Bold

5-5.5

Resistancetoblast

67

Rajalaxmi

(Hyb

rid)

Irrigated

CRHR-5(IET

19600)

CRMS32A/IR

42266-29-3R

2006

Odisha,Assam

135

Long

Slen

der

5.85


t

68

Ajay

(Hyb

rid)

Irrigated

CRHR-7(IET

18166)

CRMS31A/IR

42266-29-3R

2006

Odisha

130

Long

Slen

der

6.07

Modera

telyresista

ntto

blast,

bacterialleafbligh

t,sheathb

ligh

t,

brownplanthopper,w

hitebackplant

hopperandgallm

idge

69

Varshad

han

Semi-deep

CRLC899(IET

16481)

IR31432-8-3-

2/IR31406-3-

3-3-1//IR

26940-3-3-3-1

2006

Odisha

160

LongBold

3.5-

4.0

Stiffstraw

forwaterloggingsituation,

moderatelyresistancetoneckblast

bacterialleafbligh

tandsheathrot

70

Satya

Krishna

(CRDhan

10)

Irrigated

CRAC2221-43

(IET18312)

DHfromPHB

71

2008

Odisha

135

Long

Slen

der

5.2

Resistanttoneckblast,sheathrotand


t,

gallmidge.

71

Nua

kalajeera

Shallow

lowlands

Kalajeera(IET

18393)

Pureline

selectionfor

Kalajeera

2008

Odisha

150

ShortBold

(aromatic)

2.8

Blackhusk,aromatic;photosensitive,

resistan

ttoyellowstemb

oreran

d

moderatelyresistanttob

lastand

sheathrot

Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)


andspecialch

aracters

72

Nua

Dhusara

(CR

Sugandh

Dhan

3)

Shallow

lowlands

CR2579-

1Dhusara(IET

18395)

Pureline

selectionfor

Dhusara

2008

Odisha

150

Med

ium

Slen

der

(aromatic)

3Aromatic,resistantton

eck

blast,

sheathrot,ricetungrovirusand

moderatelyresistanttogallmidge,

andphotosensitive

73

Chan

dan

(CRBoro

dhan

2)

Boro

CRM898(IET

17612)

Gam

maray

mutantfrom

China45

2008

Odisha,Assam

125

Irrig,

145

Boro

Med

ium

Slen

der

6.1


t,

bro

wnp

lanthopper,b

lastand

bacterialleafbligh

t

74

Han

sesw

ari(CR

Dhan

70)

Semideep

MTC4(IET

11904)

Pureline

selectionin

composite

cross

2008

Odisha

150

ShortBold

3Moderatelyresistanttoblast

75

CRDhan

40

Bunded

Upland

CRR383-22

(IET19253)

N22/R

R20-5

2008

Jharkhan

dand

Mah

arashtra

110

ShortBold

3.5

Droughtto

lerant,m

oderate

ly

resistan

ttoblast,brownspot,w

hite

backplanthopper,sheathbligh

t,leaf

folderandresistanttogallm

idge

76

Swarna

Sub1

Flood

prone

shallow

lowlands

CR2539-1

(IET20266)

Swarna3/IR

49830-7-1-2-3

2009

Odisha

145

Med

ium

Slen

der

5.2

Toleranttocompletesubmergenceup

to15days

77

Sahbhagi

dhan

Rainfed

upland

IR74371-70-

1-1-CRR-1(ET

19576)

IR55419-

04*2/W

ay

Rarem

2009

Odishaan

dJharkhan

d105

LongBold;

3.5-

4.0

Toleranttodrough

t,resistancetoleaf

blast,m

oderatelyresistanceto

brown

spot,sheathrot,sheathbligh

tandleaf

folder

78

Phalgu

ni

Bunded

uplands

and

irrigated

CRAC2224-

1041(IET

18720)

DHofKRH2

2010

Odisha

117

Long

Slen

der

4.0-

4.5

Resistancetob

last,modera

tely

resistan

ttosheathrot,ricetungro

virus,b

rownspot,sheathb

light,

yellowstemborer,whitebackplant

hopper,brownplanth

opper,green

leaf

hopperandresistanttogallm

idge

79

Reeta

(CRDhan

401)

Shallow

lowland

CR780-1937-

1-3

(IET19969)

Savitri/IR44

2010

Odisha

150

Med

ium

Slen

der

5.5

Resistanttoleafblast,moderately

resistan

ttoneckblast,brownspot,

sheathbligh

t,leafblastandleaffolder

80

Luna

Suvarna

(CRDhan

403)

Coastal

Saline

CR2096-71-2

(IET18697)

Mah

suri/

Ourm

undak

an2010

Odisha

150

Med

ium

Slen

der

3.5-

4.0

Resistanttob

last,sh

eathb

light,

brownplanth

opperandleaffolder


Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)


andspecialch

aracters

81

Luna

Sampad

(CRDhan

402)

Coastal

Saline

CR2095-181-

1(IET19470)

Mah

suri/

Chak

rakan

da

2010

Odisha

140

ShortBold

3.6-

4.2

Resistanttoblast,toleranttosheath

bligh

t,brownplanthopper,an

dleaf

folder

82

Nua

Chinikam

ini

Shallow

lowland

CR2580(IET

18394)

Chinikam

ini

2010

Odisha

145-

150

ShortBold

(aromatic)

3.5

Resistanttosheathrot,ricetungro

virus,n

eck

blastgallm

idge,and


t

83

CRDhan

501

Semi-deep

CR2008-111

(IET19189)

Savitri/

Pad

mini

2010

UttarPradesh,A

ssam

152

LongBold;

3.4

Resistanttoneckblast

84

CRDhan

601

Boro

CRG1190-1

(IET18558)

Jaya/IR64

2010

Odisha,W

estBen

galand

Assam

160

Med

ium

Slen

der

5.6

Resistanttoblast,ricetungrovirus,

moderatelyresistanttobrownspot,

sheathrot,sheathbligh

t,green

leaf

hopper,leaffolderandcoldtolerance

85

CRDhan

701

Shallow

lowland

CRHR32(IET

20852)

CRMS31A/

CRL-22R

2010

Bihar,G

ujarat,Odisha

142

Med

ium

Slen

der

6Moderatelyresistanttoricetungro

virus,sheathbligh

tandbrownspot

86

CRDhan

500

Deep

Water

CR2285-6-6-

31(IET20220)

Ravan

a/

Mah

suri

2011

Odisha,UttarPradesh

160

Med

ium

Slen

der

3.5

Moderatelyresistanttoblast,neck

blast,brownspot,gallm

idgeandsheath

blightandresistan

ttoleaffolder

87

Satyab

ha

ma

(CRDhan

100)

Upland

CR2340-

11(IET20148)

IR31238-350-

3-2-1/IR

41054-102-2-

3-2

2012

Odisha

110

Med

ium

Slen

der

2.3-

4.7

Resistanttoleafbligh

t,ricetungro

virus,sheath

blight,leaffolder,

moderatelyresistanttow

hiteback

planth

opperandgallm

idge

88

Pyari

(CRDhan

200)

Aerobic

CR2624-IR

55423-01(IET

21214)

UPLRI5/IR

12979-24-

1(Brown)

2012

Odisha

115-

120

ShortBold

4.5


last,neck

blast,brownspot,sheathbligh

t,leaf

folderandgallm

idge

89

Hue(CR

Dhan301)

Irrigated

CRK26-1-2-1

(IET19351)

IR42/

Rah

aspan

jar

2012

Odisha

135

Long

Slen

der

4.5-

5.5

Resis

tantto

gallm

idgea

nd

moderatelyresistanttosheathrot

90

Improved

Lalat

Irrigated

CRMAS

2621-7-1

(IET21066)

LalatandIRBB

60

2012

Odisha

130

Long

Slen

der

4.5-

5.0


t,gall

midgean

dm


stem

borer

91

Improved

Tap

aswini

Irrigated

CRMAS2622-

7-6(IET

21070)

Tap

aswini

withIRBB60

2012

Odisha

130

ShortBold

4.0-

5.0

Resistanttob

acterialleafblight,

brownp

lanthopper,yellowstem

borer,whitebackplanth

opper

92

Sumit

(CRDhan

404)

Shallow

lowlands

CR662-22-1-

1-1-1(IET

19913)

IR-32/IR

13246

2012

Odisha

145

LongBold

5.2

Resistanttoleaffolderandsheath

bligh

t

Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)


andspecialch

aracters

93

Poorna

Bhog(CR

Basna

Dhan902)

Shallow

lowlands

CRM2203-

4(IET18008)

PusaBasmati-

1m

utant

2012

Odisha

140

Long

Slen

der

4.5-5

Resistanttoneckblastgallm

idgeand


andsheathbligh

t

94

Jalaman

i(CRDhan

503)

Deep

Water

CR2080-169-

3-2-5-2(IET

20706)

Pan

ikekoa/Am

bika

2012

Odisha

160

Med

ium

Slen

der

4.6

Moderatelyresistanttoleaffolder,

greenleafhopper,blast,neckblast,

brownsp

ot,gallm

idgeandsh

eathblight

95

Jayanti

Dhan

(CR

Dhan502)

Deep

Water

CR2282-1-2-

5-1(IET

20214)

Samson

Polo/Jalan

idhi

2012

Odisha

160

Med

ium

Slen

der

4.6


last,neck

blast,sheathbligh

t,sheathrot,rice

tungrovirusan

dresistanttoleaffolder

96

Luna

Barial(CR

Dhan406)

Coastal

Saline

CR2092-158-

3,(IET19472)

Jaya/

Lunishree

2012

Odisha

150

ShortBold

4.1


last,leaf

folderandsheathbligh

t

97

Luna

Sankhi(CR

Dhan405)

Coastal

Saline

CR2577-1

(IET21237)

IR31142-14-

1-1-3-2/IR

71350

2012

Odisha

110

Med

ium

Slen

der

4.6


lastand

sheathbligh

t

98

CR

Sgan

dh

Dhan

907

Irrigated

Late

(Aromatic)

CR2616-3-3-

3-1(IET

21044)

Dubraj/Pusa

44

2013

Chhattisgarh,O

disha,

AndhraPradesh,G

ujarat

150

Med

ium

Slen

der

(aromatic)

4.0-

4.5

Resistanttoneckblast,gallm

idgeand


andsheathbligh

t

99

CRDhan

300

Irrigated

CR2301-

5(IET19816)

NDR9370018/

KDML05//

PSB

RC60

2013

Mah

arashtra,Gujarat,

Odisha,Bihar

140

Long

Slen

der

5.0-

5.5

Resistanttoleaffolder,leafblast,neck

blast,sheathrotandsheathbligh

t

100

CRDhan

303

Irrigated

CR2649-7

(IET21589)

Udaya/IET

16611

2014

Mad

hyaPradesh,U

ttar

Pradesh,O

disha

125

ShortBold


last,neck

blast,sheathrotandricetungrovirus

101

CRDhan

305

Irrigated

CR2706(IET

21287)

IR77080-B-

34-3/IRRI123

2014

Jharkhan

d,M

aharashtra

andAndhraPradesh

125

ShortBold

4.8

Moderatelyresistanttoleafblast,

brownplanthopper,an

dw

hiteback

planth

opper

102

CRDhan

304

Irrigated

CR2644-2-6-4-

3-2(IET22117)

Tap

aswini/

IET16611

2014

Odishaan

dW

estBen

gal

130

ShortBold

5Resistanttogallm

idge

103

CRDhan

201

Aerobic

CR2721-81-3

(IET21924)

IR72022-46-2-

3-2/IRRI1

05

2014

ChhattisgarhandBihar

118

Long

Slen

der

3.8-

4.0

Moderatelyresistanttoblast,sheath

rot,sheathbligh

t,andleaffolder

104

CRDhan

202

Aerobic

CR2715-13

(IET21917)

IRRI148/IR

78877-208-B-

1-1

2014

Jharkhan

dandOdisha

115

LongBold

3.7-

4.5

Moderatelyresistanttobrownspot,

sheathrot,sheathbligh

t,leaffolder

andpigmen

tedbase

105

CRDhan

407

Rainfed

shallow

lowland

CR2459-12-8

(IET21974)

Swarna/IR64

2014

Odishaan

dW

estBen

gal

150

LongBold

5Moderatelyresistanttoneckblast


Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)


andspecialch

aracters

106

CRDhan

505

Deep

water

CR2682-4-2-

2-2-1(IET

21719)

CRLC899/Ac.

38606

2014

Odishaan

dAssam

162

Med

ium

Slen

der

4.5


last,neck

blast,sheathrot,sheathbligh

t,rice

tungrovirus,stemborer(bothdead

heartandw

hiteearheads),leaf

folder,whorlm

aggo

t,submergence

tolerance,andelongationability

107

CRDhan

101

(Ankit)

Upland

CR2702(IET

21627)

IR78875/IR

78877

2014

Odisha

110

Med

ium

Slen

der

3.98


neckblast,brownspot,sheathrot,

sheathbligh

t,leaffolder,an

dgreen

leafhopper

108

CRDhan

203

(Sachala)

Aerobic

CR2717-10-

IR84899-B-

185(IET

IR78877/

IRRI132

2014

Odisha

110

Long

Slen

der

4.05

Moderatelyresistanttoleafbligh

t,

brownspot,sheathrot,sheathbligh

tan

dleaffolder

109

CRDhan

206

(Gopinath)

Aerobic

CR2996-1-14-

29-3-1

Brahman

anak

hi/NDR

9930077

2014

Odisha

115

ShortBold

3.95

Moderatelyresistanttoleafbligh

t,

brownspot,sheathrot,sheathbligh

t,

andleaffolder

110

CRDhan

307

(Mau

dam

ani)

Irrigated

CR2599(IET

20925)

Dan

di/

Naveen//

Dan

di,

2014

Odisha

135

ShortBold


last,neck

blast,b

rownspotsheathbligh

t,leaf

folder,gallm

idge,whitebackplant

hopper,hispaan

dth

rips

111

CRDhan

408

(Chak

aAkhi)

Shallow

lowland

CR491-1590-

330-2-1

CR149-5010-

228/T1242

2014

Odisha

165

PS

LongBold

4.8

Moderatelyresistantton

eckb

last,

bacterialleafblight,sheathrot,

sheathbligh

t,leaffolderandw

hite

backplanth

opper

112

CRDhan

306(IET

22084)

Irrigated

CRK27

CRK27FR42

BPan

kaj

2014

Mad

hyaPradesh,B

ihar,

Puducherry

120-

125

ShortBold

6.0-

6.4

Moderatelyresistanttobrownspot,

stem

borer,leaffolder,andwhiteback

planth

opper

113

CRDhan

310(IET

24780)

Irrigated

CR2829-PLN-

37

ARC10075/

Naveen

2016

Odisha,M

adhyaPradesh

andUttarPradesh

125

Med

ium

Slen

der

5Highgrainprotein(10.5%)

114

CRDhan

207

(Srimati)

Aerobic

CR3629-1-5

(IET23448)

IR71700-247-

1-1-1-2/IR

57514-5-B-1-

2

2016

Odisha

110-

115

Med

ium

Slen

der

3.7


last,neck

blast,b

rownspot,sheathrot,sheath

bligh

t,leaffolder,greenleafhopper,

andgallm

idge

Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)


andspecialch

aracters

115

CRDhan

209

(Priya)

Aerobic

CR3695-1-1

(IET23467

IR72022-46-

2-3-2/IRRI

105

2016

Odisha

112-

115

Long

Slen

der


last,neck

blast,brownspot,ricetungrovirus,

sheathbligh

t,ricetungrovirus,leaf

folderandwhitebackplanth

opper

116

CRDhan

409

(Pradhan

Dhan

)

Shallow

lowland

CR2690-2-2-

1-1-1(IET

23110)

Chak

aakhhi/

AC38687

2016

Odisha

160-

165

Long

Slen

der

4.7


last,neck

blast,sheathbligh

t,sheathrot,sheath

bligh

tandleaffolder

117

CRDhan

507

(Prasant)

Deep

Water

CR3836-1-7-

4-1-1(IET

22986)

Gayatri/

Sudhir//

Varshad

han

2016

Odisha

160

Med

ium

Slen

der

4.75

Moderatelyresistanttoneckblast,

brownspot,sheathbligh

t,sheathrot,

andleaffolder

118

CRDhan

800

Shallow

lowland

CRMAS2232-

85(IET

20672)

Swarna*4/

IRBB-60

2016

Odisha

140

Med

ium

Slen

der

5.75

Moderatelyresistanttobacterial

leafbligh

tandsheathrot

119

CR

Sugandh

Dhan

910

Shallow

favo

rable

lowlands

andIrri-

gatedLate

CR2713-180

(IET22649)

Swarna/

Geetanjali

2016

Odisha

142-

145

Med

ium

Slen

der

(aromatic)

4.38

Moderatelytoleranttob

last,neck

blast,sheathrot,ricetungrovirus,

sheathbligh

t,leaffolder,whiteback

planth

opper

120

CRDhan

508

Deep

Water

CR3835-1-7-2-

1-1(IET23601)

CRLC899/

Warda2

2017

Odisha,W

estBen

gal,

Assam

160

LongBold

4.4


t,

brownspotandsheathrot

121

CRDhan

506

Semi-deep

CR2687-2-3-1

-1-1(IET

23053)

CRLC

899/W

arda2

2017

Assam

,AndhraPradesh

andKarnatak

a165

LongBold

4.2


neckblast,brownspot,sheathbligh

t,

sheathrot,tungo

virus,stemborer

(both

deadh

earta

ndw

hitee

ar

heads),leaffolderandwhorlmaggo

t.

122

CR

Sugandh

Dhan

908

Irrigated

Late

CR2713-35

(IET23189)

Swarna/

Geetanjali

2017

Odisha,W

estBen

galand

UttarP

radesh

145

Med

ium

Slen

der

(aromatic)

5Moderatelyresistanttoleafblast,

neckblast,bacterialleafbligh

t,brown

spot,stemborer,leaffolderandW

BPH

123

CR

Sugandh

Dhan

909

Irrigated

Late

CRL74-89-2-

4-1(IET

23193)

Pan

kaj/P

odum

oni

2017

Assam

,Bihar,U

ttar

Pradesh,M

aharashtra

140

Med

ium

Slen

der

(aromatic)

5Moderatelyto

leranttoleafblast,neck

blast,bacterialleafblight,b

rown

spot,stemborer,leaffolderandwhite

backplanth

opper


Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)


andspecialch

aracters

133

CRDhan

510

Semi-deep

IET23895

(CR2593-1-1-

1-1)

Sarala/V

arsha

Dhan

//CRMS

2232-85

2019

WestBen

gal,Odisha

160

ShortBold

4.6


last,leaf

folder.

134

Santha

Bhim

a(CRDhan

102)

Upland

CR3951-3-2-

2-1-1

IR64/P

SBRC

52.

2019

Odisha

105-

110

ShortBold

3.9

Moderatelyresistanttoleafblast,rice

tungrovirus;stemborer(deadheart),

leaffolderandwhorlmaggo

t.

135

Sarumina

(CRDhan

210)

Aerobic

IET25121

IR717002-

247-1-1-

2/IR77080-B-

34-1-1

2019

Odisha

110-

115

Long

slen

der

4.75


neckblast,brownspotan

dsheathrot,

stemb

orer(bothd

eadh

eartand

whiteearheads),leaffolderand

greenleafhopper.

136

CRDhan

410

(Mah

ama

ni)

Shallow

lowland

IET24471

CRLC899/A

C

38700

2019

Odisha

160-

165

Long

slen

der

(Balam

itype)

6.5

Resistanttostemborer(bothdead

heartandw

hiteearheads)andleaf

folderw

hilemoderatelyresistantto

neckblast,bacterialbligh

t,sheathrot

andbrownspotd

iseases.

137

CRDhan

312*(IET

25997)

Irrigated

CR3808-13

IR36m

ale

sterilelines

crossed

with

13paren

ts

2019

Chhattisgarhand

Mah

arashtra

105-

110

Med

ium

Slen

der

6.4


neckblastandricetungrovirus.The

genotypeh

ash

ighresponseto

fertilizerapplication.

138

CRDhan

313*(IET

25489)

Irrigated

IET25489

(CR3511-2-2-

5-1-1)

IR36/Surendr

a2019

Chhattisgarhand

Mah

arashtra

135-

140

Med

ium

Slen

der

4.7-

4.9

Resistanttofalsesmut,m

oderately

resistanttob

acterialblight,n

eck

blast,andleafblast

139

CRDhan

602*(IET

25692)

Boro

CR3724-1

(IET25692)

IR72967-12-2-

3/P

R31090-

33-2-1

2019

Assam

andTripura

165-

170

Long

Slen

der

5.79

Resistanttoblast

Sl.

No.Variety

Eco

logy

Designation

Parentage

Yearof

release

ReleasedforState

Durat

ion

Grain

Type

Yield -1

(tha)


andspecialch

aracters

124

Gan

gavati

Ageti

Upland

CRR363-36

(IET19251)

Gau

ravx

KalingaIII

2017

Karnatak

a85

Long

Slen

der

(aromatic)

3.5

Resistanttobrownspot,gallmidge

(bio

type-1

),ste

mb

orera

nd

moderatelyresistanttoleafblast,

moderatelyresistanttogallmidge

(biotype-4,5)an

dleaffolder.

125

Purna

Upland

CRR356-29

(IET18654)

Annad

axRR

151-3

2017

Gujarat

90

Short

Bold

3.5


bro

wnspot,stemb

orerandleaf

folder.Toleranttodrough

t.

126

CRDhan

204

Aerobic

CR2696-IR

83920

IRRI76569-

259-1-2-1/C

T

6510-24-1-2.

2019

Jharkhan

dandTam

ilNad

u120

LongBold

4.2

Moderatelyresistantton

eckb

last,

brownspot,sheathrot,leaffolder,leaf

blastandgoodgrainquality

127

CRDhan

205(IET

22737)

Aerobic

CR3001-IR-

86931-B-578-

CR-5-5-2

N22/Swarna

2019

Tam

ilNad

u,G

ujarat,

Odisha,M

adhyaPradesh,

Punjab

110

ShortBold

3.7-

4.5


brownspot,sheathrot,stemborer,

andleaffolder

128

CRDhan

311

(Mukul)

Irrigated

CR2829-PLN-

100(IET

24772)

HP-2/Naveen

2019

Odisha

120-

126

LongBold

5.54

Toleranttob

last,brownspot,rice

tungrovirus,b

acterialleafblight,

moderatelyresistanttogallmidge,

sheath

blightandh

ighp

rotein

(10.1%),highZn(20ppm)

129

CRDhan

309

Irrigated

IR95797-

CR3847-2-1-

1-1-1,IET

25345

IR77080-B-

34-3/IRRI132

2019

Assam

,Chhattisgarh,U

ttar

Pradesh

115

Long

Slen

der

6.5

Resistanttostemborer(deadheart

andw

hiteearhead),leaffolderand

whorlmaggo

t

130

CRDhan

802

(Subhas)

Shallow

lowland

CR3925-22-7,

IET25673

Swarna-

Sub1*4/

IR81896-B-B-

195

2019

Bihar,M

adhyaPradesh

142

ShortBold

5.5

Submergenceandd

rough

ttolerant.

Resistanttostemborer(bothdead

heartandwhiteearheads),leaffolder,

planthoppera

ndc

asew

orm,

moderatelyresistanttob

acterial

bligh

t,sheathrotandricetungrovirus.

131

CRDhan

511

Semi-deep

CR2789-9-2,

IET213906

Gayatri/

Mah

suri//CR

997.

2019

WestBen

gal,Andhra

Pradesh

160

ShortBold

5Moderatelyresistanttoleafblast,

neckb

lastandb

acterialblight

diseases,stemborer(bothdeadheart

andw

hiteearheads),whitebacked

planth

opperandleaffolder

132

CRDhan

801

Shallow

IET25667

Lowland

IR81896-B-B-

195/2*

SwarnaSub1//

IR91659-54-35

2019

AP,Telen

gana,Odisha,UP

andW

B140

ShortBold

6.3


neck

blast,bacterialblight,stem

borer(bothdeadheartandwhiteear

heads)andleaffolder.

*Iden

ti�ied

forrelease


ANNEXUREII.

QualitycharactersofricevarietiesreleasedbyICAR-N

RRI,Cuttack

,Odisha.

Sl.No.

Varieties

Hulling(%)

Milling(%)

HRR(%)

KL

KB

L/B

ASV

WU(100g)

ER

VER

KLAC

Amylose

1CRDhan

305

75.5

63.5

47.0

6.4

2.1

2.9

3.0

180.0

1.7

3.7

11.0

20.4

2Sw

arnaSu

b1

76.5

64.0

61.0

5.1

2.1

2.4

3.0

150.0

1.4

3.5

7.7

20.3

3Sn

eha

76.5

64.5

48.0

5.2

2.0

2.6

4.0

207.5

1.9

3.7

10.3

22.0

4CRDhan

205

78.0

65.5

62.0

5.5

2.0

2.7

6.0

230.0

1.7

3.7

9.9

21.2

5Kalinga-3

76.0

61.5

34.5

5.5

1.8

2.9

3.0

112.5

1.6

3.7

9.2

22.6

6Van

aprabha

75.5

57.0

36.0

5.9

2.0

2.9

3.0

145.0

1.6

3.7

9.8

22.2

7Pyari

77.0

64.5

59.0

5.2

2.0

2.5

3.0

95.0

1.7

3.7

8.9

22.3

8CRDhan

306

78.0

67.5

64.5

5.0

1.9

2.5

3.0

102.5

1.6

4.0

8.4

20.1

9CRDhan

201

74.0

60.0

48.5

6.4

2.1

3.0

6.0

260.0

1.5

4.0

10.0

24.4

10

SahbhagiD

han

75.5

63.0

48.5

5.6

2.1

2.6

6.0

180.0

1.7

4.2

9.9

27.4

11

Tulsi

78.0

63.0

61.5

5.2

2.0

2.5

3.0

135.0

1.6

3.5

8.8

24.1

12

Annad

a77.5

67.0

57.5

5.5

2.3

2.4

3.0

100.0

1.5

3.7

8.5

23.8

13

PoornaBhog

75.5

59.5

38.5

5.8

1.6

3.5

7.0

190.0

1.6

3.7

9.4

21.8

14

NuaChinikam

ini

79.5

71.0

53.5

3.5

2.0

1.6

3.0

155.0

2.0

3.7

7.3

21.8

15

Kam

esh

78.0

63.0

50.0

5.2

2.3

2.2

3.0

150.0

1.4

3.7

7.4

24.1

16

HazariD

han

74.5

58.5

47.5

6.0

2.1

2.8

3.0

125.0

1.5

3.7

9.3

26.2

17

DhalaHeera

76.0

57.5

34.5

5.5

2.2

2.4

3.0

67.5

1.6

3.7

9.3

24.1

18

Supriya

79.0

62.0

40.5

5.5

2.2

2.4

3.0

92.5

1.4

3.7

8.3

25.1

19

Kalinga-II

78.0

63.5

51.5

5.1

2.2

2.2

3.0

60.0

1.6

3.7

8.4

26.3

20

Satabdi

74.0

60.5

44.0

5.9

1.7

3.4

3.0

95.0

1.3

3.5

7.8

23.8

21

Sumit

78.5

62.5

48.0

6.0

2.3

2.6

3.0

140.0

1.6

3.7

9.6

24.0

22

Han

sesw

ari

79.0

63.0

54.5

5.1

2.4

2.0

4.0

180.0

1.5

3.7

7.9

26.7

23

Sonam

ani

81.5

70.5

68.0

5.2

2.3

2.2

3.0

105.0

1.7

3.5

9.3

20.9

24

Chan

dhan

80.0

69.0

66.0

5.5

2.1

2.6

7.0

205.0

1.6

3.5

8.9

22.9

25

Rad

hi

81.5

71.0

63.0

5.9

2.1

2.7

4.0

85.0

1.6

3.5

9.6

24.2

26

Tap

aswan

i80.0

69.5

66.5

5.0

2.0

2.5

3.0

45.0

1.7

3.7

8.8

21.0

27

Durga

81.0

68.0

65.5

4.9

2.0

2.5

3.0

80.0

1.8

3.5

9.3

23.8

28

CR-1014

78.5

69.5

64.0

4.8

1.6

3.0

3.0

75.0

1.8

3.7

8.7

20.8

29

Pan

idhan

78.0

65.5

59.0

5.3

1.9

2.8

3.0

85.0

1.8

4.0

9.6

21.6

Sl.No.

Varieties

Hulling(%)

Milling(%)

HRR(%)

KL

KB

L/B

ASV

WU(100g)

ER

VER

KLAC

Amylose

30

CRHR-32

80.0

69.5

64.0

5.6

2.1

2.6

5.0

125.0

1.8

3.7

10.3

25.7

31

Pooja

79.0

66.5

53.5

5.1

2.0

2.4

3.0

80.0

1.8

3.7

9.2

22.0

32

Neela

80.5

68.5

62.0

6.4

2.2

2.8

4.0

90.0

1.6

3.5

10.7

21.4

33

Lalat

80.0

68.0

61.0

6.2

2.0

3.0

3.0

85.0

1.5

3.7

9.8

23.5

34

Khira

81.0

69.0

57.5

5.1

2.3

2.2

4.0

80.0

1.8

3.7

9.2

23.5

35

CRDhan

204

78.0

66.5

62.5

5.5

2.0

2.7

3.0

92.5

1.6

3.7

9.0

22.2

36

Satyak

rishna

80.5

70.5

55.0

6.6

1.8

3.5

4.0

95.0

1.6

3.7

10.9

21.3

37

Chan

drama

78.0

70.5

61.5

5.2

2.2

2.3

3.0

80.0

1.6

3.5

8.5

20.9

38

Van

dan

a77.5

64.0

44.0

5.7

2.1

2.7

3.0

70.0

1.8

3.5

10.4

20.9

39

Utkalprava

78.0

66.5

63.0

5.1

2.2

2.3

3.0

85.0

1.7

4.0

9.1

21.4

40

Lunasan

khi

79.0

68.5

55.5

5.7

2.0

2.8

4.0

100.0

1.8

3.7

10.7

22.3

41

CRDhan

601

79.5

69.5

56.5

5.4

2.2

2.4

5.0

155.0

1.9

4.0

10.6

22.5

42

Abhishek

78.5

66.5

58.0

4.8

2.1

2.2

3.0

50.0

1.9

4.2

9.4

24.2

43

Phalgu

ni

80.0

67.5

52.5

6.0

2.0

3.0

3.0

62.5

1.7

4.2

10.4

21.4

44

Kalyani-II

81.0

67.5

33.5

6.3

2.1

2.9

4.0

115.0

1.5

3.7

9.8

24.8

45

Jalaman

i77.5

69.0

48.5

5.8

2.0

2.9

3.0

130.0

1.6

4.0

9.7

23.1

46

Anjali

80.0

70.0

60.5

5.6

2.3

2.4

4.0

77.5

1.5

3.7

8.9

20.2

47

Lunab

arial

79.5

70.0

67.0

5.6

2.2

2.5

4.0

112.5

1.5

3.5

8.8

21.6

48

Nuak

alajeera

79.5

70.0

58.5

3.9

1.9

2.0

4.0

92.5

1.8

3.7

7.2

20.5

49

Lunishree

78.5

67.5

59.5

6.6

2.0

3.3

4.0

92.5

1.4

3.7

9.8

22.8

50

Kalinga-I

79.5

70.0

58.5

5.3

2.1

2.5

5.0

70.0

1.8

3.7

9.9

21.0

51

Lunasuvarna

79.5

69.5

53.0

5.6

2.1

2.6

4.0

85.0

1.4

3.7

7.9

21.3

52

Khitish

79.5

70.0

61.0

6.1

1.8

3.3

4.0

115.0

1.5

3.7

9.6

23.7

53

Hue

79.5

68.0

58.5

7.2

1.9

3.8

4.0

85.0

1.5

3.7

11.4

21.9

54

Sattari

80.0

67.5

62.0

4.7

2.2

2.1

5.0

145.0

1.8

3.5

8.7

24.6

55

JayantiDhan

76.5

69.0

65.0

5.5

1.7

3.1

4.0

75.0

1.8

3.5

10.0

20.1

56

Gayatri

80.0

71.0

66.0

4.7

2.5

1.8

4.0

85.0

1.5

3.7

7.2

22.2

57

Ajay(Hyb

rid)

80.5

67.0

51.0

5.7

1.9

3.0

6.0

147.5

1.8

3.7

10.4

23.3


Sl.No.

Varieties

Hulling(%)

Milling(%)

HRR(%)

KL

KB

L/B

ASV

WU(100g)

ER

VER

KLAC

Amylose

58

SwarnaSu

b1

77.5

68.0

66.5

4.7

1.9

2.4

4.0

70.0

1.7

3.7

8.3

20.8

59

Varshad

han

78.5

66.0

64.5

5.9

2.0

2.8

4.0

117.5

1.4

3.7

8.5

22.7

60

CRDhan

202

78.5

68.5

61.0

5.5

2.0

2.6

4.0

172.5

1.6

3.5

9.3

20.9

61

Savitri

78.5

68.5

65.5

4.4

2.4

1.8

4.0

97.5

1.8

3.7

8.3

22.1

62

Sarasa

81.0

68.0

46.5

6.0

2.1

2.8

4.0

100.0

1.6

3.7

10.0

22.6

63

Satyab

ham

a78.0

68.0

62.5

5.5

2.1

2.5

4.0

120.0

1.5

3.7

8.6

21.1

64

Geetanjali

80.5

68.0

60.0

6.4

1.7

3.6

4.0

110.0

1.7

3.7

11.4

21.0

65

Heera

79.5

65.5

54.5

6.3

2.1

2.9

4.0

92.5

1.7

3.7

11.0

22.6

66

Pad

mini

77.5

67.5

63.5

4.7

1.4

3.3

4.0

135.0

1.9

3.5

9.0

20.5

67

Indira

79.5

69.5

63.0

5.2

2.4

2.2

6.0

180.0

1.9

3.7

10.2

21.1

68

Rajalaxmi(Hyb

rid)

79.5

67.0

54.0

6.3

1.9

3.3

6.0

197.5

1.6

3.5

10.3

21.2

69

Samalei

78.5

69.0

64.0

6.3

1.9

3.2

4.0

130.0

1.7

3.7

10.8

20.7

70

Sarala

79.5

64.0

59.5

5.1

1.8

2.8

4.0

180.0

1.8

4.0

9.6

21.6

71

CRDhan

304

80.5

67.5

55.5

5.3

2.2

2.3

4.0

127.5

1.6

3.7

9.0

22.3

72

Ketek

ijoha

79.5

69.0

63.0

5.5

1.7

3.1

4.0

95.0

1.8

4.0

10.3

20.8

73

Shak

timan

78.5

68.5

48.0

4.8

2.2

2.2

6.0

250.0

1.9

3.7

9.3

20.6

74

Moti

78.5

67.0

58.5

6.1

2.1

2.9

4.0

165.0

1.8

3.7

11.0

21.8

75

Uday

79.5

68.0

65.5

5.3

2.3

2.2

4.0

147.5

1.7

3.7

9.3

20.5

76

Tap

aswan

i(MAS)

78.5

70.0

67.0

5.3

2.0

2.6

4.0

85.0

1.5

3.7

8.1

20.3

77

Reeta

78.5

67.0

55.5

6.0

2.2

2.7

4.0

105.0

1.8

3.7

10.9

21.8

78

LunaSampad

81.5

70.5

51.5

4.9

2.1

2.3

4.0

145.0

1.9

3.5

9.3

22.7

79

Saket-4

78.5

68.5

65.5

6.0

1.8

3.2

4.0

115.0

1.5

3.7

9.4

21.7

80

CRDhan

300

75.5

63.0

52.5

6.0

1.8

3.3

4.0

90.0

1.7

3.7

10.3

21.4

81

CRDhan

303

79.5

66.5

41.5

5.5

2.2

2.4

4.0

112.5

1.6

3.7

8.9

22.0

82

Tara

79.5

62.5

28.0

5.1

2.0

2.4

7.0

282.5

1.7

3.7

8.8

21.4

83

Ratna

78.5

65.5

55.5

6.0

1.9

3.0

4.0

135.0

1.7

3.7

10.6

20.7

84

Dharitri

81.0

72.0

65.5

4.7

2.4

1.9

4.0

115.0

1.7

3.5

8.5

22.6

85

Sadab

ahar

79.0

68.0

49.5

5.3

1.9

2.7

7.0

190.0

1.4

3.5

7.6

20.9

ANNEXUREIII. ResponseofricevarietiesreleasedbyICAR-NRRI,Cuttack,Odishatoblastdisease.

Sl.No. Variety Diseasescore DiseaseReaction No.ofRgenes

1 Ratna 9 S

2 Saket-4 8 S

3 Kalinga-I 5 MR

4 Kalinga-II 8 S

5 Supriya 6 S

6 Indira 8 S

7 Samalei 1 R 7

8 Sattari 7 S

9 Savitri 1 R 9

10 Khitish 7 S

11 Utkalprabha 6 S

12 Sarasa 0 R 6

13 Udaya 8 S

14 Annada 6 S

15 CR1014 7 S

16 Dharitri 8 S

17 Gayatri 7 S

18 Heera 7 S

19 Kalyani-II 7 S

20 Moti 9 S

21 Padmini 6 S

22 Panidhan 1 R 9

23 Shaktiman 5 MR

24 Lunishree 1 R 7

25 Radhi 5 MR

26 Sonamani 9 S

27 Tapaswini 8 S

28 Pooja 7 S

29 Sarala 7 S

30 Durga 6 S

31 Anjali 6 S

32 Hazaridhan 5 MR

33 Abhishek 1 R 8

34 Chandrama 1 R 6

35 Virender 6 S

36 Geetanjali 4 MR

37 Ketekijoha 5 MR

38 Naveen 5 MR

39 Rajalaxmi(Hybrid) 5 MR

HRR-Headricerecovery,K

L-Kernallength,K

B-Kernalbread

h,L/B

-Len

gthtobread

hratio,A

SV-Alkalispread

value,W

U-W

ateruptake,E

R-Elongationratio,V

ER-VerticalE

longationratio,K

LAC-Kernallengthaftercooking


Sl.No. Variety Diseasescore DiseaseReaction No.ofRgenes

40 Ajay(Hybrid) 5 MR

41 Varshadhan 7 S

42 SatyaKrishna(CRDhan10) 1 R 4

43 Nuakalajeera 5 MR

44 NuaDhusara(CRSugandhDhan3) 5 MR

45 Chandan(CRBorodhan2) 2 R 4

46 Hanseswari(CRDhan70) 8 S

47 SwarnaSub1 6 S

48 CRDhan40 6 S

49 Sahbhagidhan 1 R 9

50 Phalguni 7 S

51 Reeta(CRDhan401) 1 R 9

52 LunaSuvarna(CRDhan403) 5 MR

53 LunaSampad(CRDhan402) 6 MR

54 NuaChinikamini 6 S

55 CRDhan501 8 S

56 CRDhan701 5 MR

57 CRDhan601 5 MR

58 CRDhan500 5 MR

59 Satyabhama(CRDhan100) 3 R 7

60 Pyari(CRDhan200) 4 MR

61 Hue(CRDhan301) 5 MR

62 ImprovedLalat 5 MR

63 ImprovedTapaswini 8 S

64 Sumit(CRDhan404) 2 R 9

65 PoornaBhog(CRBasnaDhan902) 7 S

66 Jalamani(CRDhan503) 2 R 4

67 JayantiDhan(CRDhan502) 2 R 9

68 LunaBarial(CRDhan406) 5 MR

69 LunaSankhi(CRDhan405) 6 S

70 CRSugandhDhan907 6 S

71 CRDhan300 2 R 6

72 CRDhan303 6 S

73 CRDhan305 4 MR

74 CRDhan304 7 S

75 CRDhan201 6 S

76 CRDhan202 2 R 7

77 CRDhan204 1 R 7

78 CRDhan306(IET22084) 7 S

79 CRDhan205(IET22737) 1 R 9

80 CRDhan307(Maudamani) 7 S

ANNEXUREIV. ResponseofricevarietiesreleasedbyICAR-NRRI,Cuttack,Odishatobrownspotdisease.

Sl.No.

Variety Diseasescore Reaction

1 Ratna 5 MS

2 Saket-4 7 HS

3 Kalinga-I 5 MS

4 Kalinga-II 5 MS

5 Supriya 7 HS

6 Indira 5 MS

7 Samalei 5 MS

8 Sattari 9 HS

9 Savitri 5 MS

10 Khitish 3 MR

11 Kalinga-III 5 MS

12 Utkalprabha 5 MS

13 Neela 8 HS

14 Sarasa 8 HS

15 Udaya 4 MR

16 Annada 4 MR

17 CR1014 4 MR

18 Dharitri 4 MR

19 Heera 6 MS

20 Kalashree 8 HS

21 Kalyani-II 6 MS

22 Khira 8 HS

23 Moti 5 MS

24 Padmini 5 MS

25 Panidhan 5 MS

26 Tara 6 MS

27 Tulasi 6 MS

28 Vanaprabha 9 HS

29 Lunishree 7 HS

30 Sneha 7 HS

31 Vandana 7 HS

32 DhalaHeera 5 MS

33 Radhi 5 MSR-Resistant,MR-ModeratelyResistant,S-Susceptible


Sl.No.


34 Sonamani 4 MR

35 Tapaswini 5 MS

36 Pooja 7 HS

37 Sarala 3 MR

38 Durga 5 MS

39 Shatabdi 5 MS

40 Anjali 5 MS

41 Hazaridhan 3 MR

42 Sadabahar 5 MS

43 Abhishek 7 HS

44 Chandrama 5 MS

45 Virender 5 MS

46 Geetanjali 6 MS

47 Ketekijoha 5 MS

48 Naveen 5 MS

49 Rajalaxmi(Hybrid) 5 MS

50 Ajay(Hybrid) 7 HS

51 Varshadhan 4 MR

52 SatyaKrishna(CRDhan10) 3 MR

53 Nuakalajeera 7 HS

54 NuaDhusara(CRSugandhDhan3) 5 MS

55 Chandan(CRBoroDhan2) 5 MS

56 Hanseswari(CRDhan70) 6 MS

57 SwarnaSub1 4 MR

58 CRDhan40 5 MS

59 Sahbhagidhan 5 MS

60 Phalguni 5 MS

61 Reeta(CRDhan401) 3 MR

62 LunaSuvarna(CRDhan403) 3 MR

63 LunaSampad(CRDhan402) 8 HS

64 NuaChinikamini 6 HS

65 CRDhan501 7 HS

66 CRDhan701 5 MS

67 CRDhan601 5 MS

Sl.No.


68 CRDhan500 7 HS

69 Satyabhama(CRDhan100) 7 HS

70 Pyari(CRDhan200) 4 MR

71 Hue(CRDhan301) 7 HS

72 ImprovedLalat 5 MS

73 ImprovedTapaswini 5 MS

74 Sumit(CRDhan404) 7 HS

75 PoornaBhog(CRBasnaDhan902) 6 MS

76 Jalamani(CRDhan503) 6 MS

77 JayantiDhan(CRDhan502) 5 MS

78 LunaBarial(CRDhan406) 7 HS

79 LunaSankhi(CRDhan405) 7 HS

80 CRSugandhDhan907 5 MS

81 CRDhan300 6 MS

82 CRDhan303 5 MS

83 CRDhan305 4 MR

84 CRDhan304 3 MR

85 CRDhan201 7 HS

86 CRDhan202 3 MR

87 CRDhan505 7 HS

88 CRDhan204 7 HS

89 CRDhan306(IET22084) 8 HS

90 CRDhan101(Ankit) 9 HS

91 CRDhan206(Gopinath) 7 HS

92 CRDhan307(Maudamani) 7 HS

93 CRDhan408(ChakaAkhi) 7 HS

94 CRDhan310(IET24780) 5 MS

95 CRDhan409(PradhanDhan) 5 MS

96 CRDhan507(Prasant) 7 HS

97 CRDhan800 5 MS

98 CRSugandhDhan910 6 MS

99 CRDhan311(Mukul) 6 MS

100 CRDhan506 8 HS

101 CRSugandhDhan908 8 HS


R-Resistant,MR-ModeratelyResistant,S-Susceptible,MS-ModeratelySusceptible,HS-HighlySusceptible


ANNEXUREV. ResponseofricevarietiesreleasedbyICAR-NRRI,Cuttack,Odishatosheathblight.

Sl.No. Varieties Diseasescore Diseasereaction

1 Ratna 7 S

2 Saket-4 7 S

3 Kalinga-I 7 S

4 Kalinga-II 7 S

5 Supriya 9 HS

6 Indira 7 S

7 Ramakrishna 5 MT

8 Samalei 9 HS

9 Sattari 9 HS

10 Savitri 9 HS

11 Khitish 7 S

12 Kalinga-III 3 T

13 Utkalprabha 9 HS

14 Neela 9 HS

15 Sarasa 7 S

16 Udaya 7 S

17 Annada 7 S

18 CR1014 1 MR

19 Dharitri 7 S

20 Gayatri 7 S

21 Heera 7 S

22 Khira 9 HS

23 Moti 9 HS

24 Padmini 7 S

25 Panidhan 9 HS

26 Tara 7 S

27 Tulasi 7 S

28 Vanaprabha 9 HS

29 Shaktiman 7 S

30 Lunishree 9 HS

31 Sneha 7 S


32 Vandana 3 T

33 DhalaHeera 7 S

34 Radhi 7 S

35 Sonamani 9 HS

36 Tapaswini 9 HS

37 Pooja 7 S

38 Sarala 7 S

39 Durga 1 MR

40 Shatabdi 9 HS

41 Anjali 3 T

42 Hazaridhan 9 HS

43 Sadabahar 9 HS

44 Abhishek 9 HS

45 Chandrama 5 MT

46 Virender 7 S

47 Geetanjali 3 T

48 Ketekijoha 5 MT

49 Naveen 1 MR

50 Rajalaxmi(Hybrid) 5 MR

51 Ajay(Hybrid) 5 MT

52 Varshadhan 5 MT

53 SatyaKrishna(CRDhan10) 7 S

54 Nuakalajeera 7 S

55 NuaDhusara(CRSugandhDhan3) 7 S

56 Chandan(CRBorodhan2) 1 MR

57 Hanseswari(CRDhan70) 1 MR

58 SwarnaSub1 9 HS

59 CRDhan40 9 HS

60 Sahbhagidhan 1 MR

61 Phalguni 9 HS

62 Reeta(CRDhan401) 3 T

63 LunaSuvarna(CRDhan403) 7 S

64 LunaSampad(CRDhan402) 7 S

65 NuaChinikamini 7 S

66 CRDhan501 9 HS

67 CRDhan701 3 T

68 CRDhan601 1 MR

69 CRDhan500 9 HS

70 Satyabhama(CRDhan100) 7 S

71 Pyari(CRDhan200) 7 S



72 Hue(CRDhan301) 7 S

73 ImprovedLalat 3 MR

74 ImprovedTapaswini 9 HS

75 Sumit(CRDhan404) 5 MT

76 PoornaBhog(CRBasnaDhan902) 9 HS

77 Jalamani(CRDhan503) 7 S

78 JayantiDhan(CRDhan502) 7 S

79 LunaBarial(CRDhan406) 9 HS

80 LunaSankhi(CRDhan405) 9 HS

81 CRSugandhDhan907 7 S

82 CRDhan300 5 MT

83 CRDhan303 7 S

84 CRDhan305 7 S

85 CRDhan304 9 HS

86 CRDhan201 7 S

87 CRDhan202 9 HS

88 CRDhan505 7 S

89 CRDhan204 9 HS

90 CRDhan306(IET22084) 5 MT


92 CRDhan101(Ankit) 9 HS

93 CRDhan203(Sachala) 7 S

94 CRDhan206(Gopinath) 7 S

95 CRDhan307(Maudamani) 3 T

96 CRDhan408(ChakaAkhi) 5 MT


98 CRDhan311(Mukul) 7 S

ANNEXUREVI. ResponseofricevarietiesreleasedbyICAR-NRRI,Cuttack,Odishatobakanaedisease.

Sl.No.

Variety MeanElongation

(%)

Diseaseincidence

(%)

DiseaseScore

DiseaseReaction

1 Ratna 7.5 56.5 5 MS

2 Saket-4 8.3 20.3 3 MR

3 Kalinga-I 12.3 23.3 3 MR

4 Kalinga-II 12.3 23.3 3 MR

5 Supriya 26.3 65.5 7 S

6 Indira 70.3 90.0 9 HS

7 Samalei 25.3 85.0 9 HS

8 Sattari 23.3 92.3 9 HS

9 Savitri 36.3 85.3 9 HS

10 Khitish 8.5 35.3 3 MR

11 Kalinga-III 26.3 85.3 9 HS

12 Utkalprabha 21.2 82.0 9 HS

13 Neela 6.3 13.0 1 R

14 Sarasa 5.2 3.5 0 HR

15 Udaya 10.3 24.5 3 MR

16 Annada 60.0 100.0 9 HS

17 CR1014 10.5 25.3 3 MR

18 Dharitri 65.3 100.0 9 HS

19 Heera 55.2 85.5 9 HS

20 Kalashree 6.3 12.5 1 R

21 Kalyani-II 10.5 23.3 3 MR

22 Khira 3.3 6.2 0 HR

23 Moti 10.5 45.3 5 MS

24 Padmini 35.3 85.3 9 HS

25 Panidhan 25.3 54.0 5 MS

26 Tara 12.3 33.0 5 MR

27 Tulasi 31.3 91.3 9 HS

28 Vanaprabha 8.5 50.3 5 MS

29 Lunishree 10.3 22.0 3 MR

30 Sneha 25.3 81.0 9 HS

31 Vandana 32.3 82.0 9 HS

32 DhalaHeera 32.3 100.0 9 HS

33 Radhi 55.3 100.0 9 HS

34 Sonamani 35.2 82.3 9 HS

35 Tapaswini 65.3 95.0 9 HS

36 Pooja 25.3 92.5 9 HS

T-Tolerant,MT-ModeratelyTolerant,MR-ModeratelyResistant,S-Susceptible,MS-ModeratelySusceptible,HS-HighlySusceptible


Sl.No.


(%)

Diseaseincidence

(%)

DiseaseScore

DiseaseReaction

37 Sarala 54.3 82.3 9 HS

38 Durga 25.0 66.3 7 S

39 Shatabdi 18.3 38.5 3 MR

40 Anjali 60.5 85.5 9 HS

41 Hazaridhan 65.3 82.3 9 HS

42 Sadabahar 2.3 1.5 0 HR

43 Abhishek 55.5 100.0 9 HS

44 Chandrama 15.3 55.5 5 MS

45 Virender 36.5 65.5 7 S

46 Geetanjali 65.3 100.0 9 HS

47 Ketekijoha 10.3 22.0 3 MR

48 Naveen 15.3 28.5 3 MR

49 Rajalaxmi(Hybrid) 36.3 81.5 9 HS

50 Ajay(Hybrid) 26.3 85.0 9 HS

51 Varshadhan 10.3 32.2 3 MR

52 SatyaKrishna(CRDhan10) 31.3 100.0 9 HS

53 Nuakalajeera 6.5 14.5 1 R

54 NuaDhusara(CRSugandhDhan3) 25.3 65.3 5 MS

55 Chandan(CRBorodhan2) 12.3 26.3 5 MR

56 Hanseswari(CRDhan70) 10.5 70.3 7 S

57 SwarnaSub1 8.5 12.3 1 R

58 Sahbhagidhan 60.3 90.0 9 HS

59 Phalguni 10.3 23.3 3 MR

60 Reeta(CRDhan401) 70.3 100.0 9 HS

61 LunaSuvarna(CRDhan403) 14.3 42.3 5 MS

62 LunaSampad(CRDhan402) 40.5 100.0 9 HS

63 NuaChinikamini 26.3 30.3 3 MR

64 CRDhan501 35.3 85.5 9 HS

65 CRDhan701 56.0 90.0 9 HS

66 CRDhan601 25.3 62.3 7 S

67 CRDhan500 12.3 22.0 3 MR

68 Satyabhama(CRDhan100) 42.3 92.5 9 HS

69 Pyari(CRDhan200) 32.3 35.3 3 MR

70 Hue(CRDhan301) 35.5 45.5 5 MS

71 ImprovedLalat 8.3 26.5 3 MR

72 ImprovedTapaswini 1.5 5.0 0 HR

73 Sumit(CRDhan404) 6.3 38.5 3 MR

74 PoornaBhog(CRBasnaDhan902) 5.7 15.0 1 R

Sl.No.


(%)

Diseaseincidence

(%)

DiseaseScore

DiseaseReaction

75 Jalamani(CRDhan503) 25.3 45.5 5 MS

76 JayantiDhan(CRDhan502) 15.3 62.3 7 S

77 LunaBarial(CRDhan406) 35.3 82.3 9 HS

78 LunaSankhi(CRDhan405) 2.3 6.3 0 HR

79 CRSugandhDhan907 65.0 100.0 9 HS

80 CRDhan300 38.5 86.5 9 HS

81 CRDhan303 24.3 65.3 7 S

82 CRDhan305 5.8 38.5 3 MR

83 CRDhan304 68.5 45.3 5 MS

84 CRDhan201 50.0 100.0 9 HS

85 CRDhan202 26.3 70.3 7 S

86 CRDhan505 10.3 62.3 7 S

87 CRDhan204 45.3 85.5 9 HS

88 CRDhan306(IET22084) 55.3 85.5 9 HS

89 CRDhan101(Ankit) 23.3 85.3 9 HS

90 CRDhan206(Gopinath) 15.3 62.0 7 S

91 CRDhan307(Maudamani) 13.5 22.5 3 MR

92 CRDhan408(ChakaAkhi) 34.5 92.3 9 HS

93 CRDhan310(IET24780) 14.3 34.5 3 MR

94 CRDhan409(PradhanDhan) 10.3 22.0 3 MR

95 CRDhan507(Prasant) 32.5 100.0 9 HS

96 CRDhan800 8.5 31.0 3 MR


98 CRDhan311(Mukul) 2.3 3.5 0 HR

99 CRDhan508 26.3 82.0 9 HS

100 CRDhan506 10.5 62.5 7 S



HR-HighlyResistant,R-Resistant,MR-ModeratelyResistant,S-Susceptible,MS-ModeratelySusceptible,HS-HighlySusceptible


ANNEXUREVII. ResponseofricevarietiesreleasedbyICAR-NRRI,Cuttack,Odishatoseedlingblightdisease.

Sl.No. Variety Score DiseaseReaction

1 Ratna 5 S

2 Saket-4 7 HS

3 Kalinga-I 7 HS

4 Kalinga-II 7 HS

5 Supriya 5 S

6 Indira 5 S

7 Samalei 1 R

8 Sattari 5 S

9 Savitri 1 R

10 Khitish 5 S

11 Kalinga-III 5 S

12 Utkalprabha 7 HS

13 Neela 0 HR

14 Sarasa 1 R

15 Udaya 7 HS

16 Annada 7 HS

17 CR1014 5 S

18 Dharitri 7 HS

19 Gayatri 7 HS

20 Heera 1 R

21 Kalyani-II 3 MR

22 Khira 1 R

23 Moti 7 HS

24 Padmini 7 HS

25 Panidhan 7 HS

26 Tara 3 MR

27 Tulasi 3 MR

28 Vanaprabha 1 R

29 Shaktiman 7 HS

30 Lunishree 1 R

31 Sneha 1 R

32 Vandana 1 R

33 DhalaHeera 1 R

34 Radhi 7 HS

35 Sonamani 5 S

36 Tapaswini 7 HS

37 Pooja 3 MR

38 Sarala 5 S

39 Durga 7 HS

40 Shatabdi 0 HR

41 Anjali 7 HS

42 Hazaridhan 7 HS

43 Sadabahar 1 R

44 Abhishek 5 S

45 Chandrama 5 S

46 Virender 5 S

47 Geetanjali 5 S

48 Ketekijoha 5 S

Sl.No. Variety Score DiseaseReaction

49 Naveen 3 R

50 Rajalaxmi(Hybrid) 7 HS

51 Ajay(Hybrid) 7 HS

52 Varshadhan 7 HS

53 SatyaKrishna(CRDhan10) 7 HS

54 Nuakalajeera 7 HS

55 NuaDhusara(CRSugandhDhan3) 3 MR

56 Chandan(CRBorodhan2) 7 HS

57 Hanseswari(CRDhan70) 7 HS

58 SwarnaSub1 0 HR

59 CRDhan40 5 S

60 Sahbhagidhan 7 HS

61 Phalguni 7 HS

62 Reeta(CRDhan401) 7 HS

63 LunaSuvarna(CRDhan403) 1 R

64 LunaSampad(CRDhan402) 5 S

65 NuaChinikamini 3 MR

66 CRDhan501 5 S

67 CRDhan701 3 MR

68 CRDhan601 7 HS

69 CRDhan500 7 HS

70 Satyabhama(CRDhan100) 7 HS

71 Pyari(CRDhan200) 1 R

72 Hue(CRDhan301) 7 HS

73 ImprovedLalat 5 S

74 ImprovedTapaswini 7 HS

75 Sumit(CRDhan404) 5 S

76 PoornaBhog(CRBasnaDhan902) 5 S

77 Jalamani(CRDhan503) 7 HS

78 JayantiDhan(CRDhan502) 3 MR

79 LunaBarial(CRDhan406) 5 S

80 LunaSankhi(CRDhan405) 5 S


82 CRDhan300 5 S

83 CRDhan303 7 HS

84 CRDhan305 3 MR

85 CRDhan304 7 HS

86 CRDhan201 5 S

87 CRDhan202 5 S

88 CRDhan505 5 S

89 CRDhan204 7 HS

90 CRDhan306(IET22084) 5 S


92 CRDhan101(Ankit) 1 R

93 CRDhan203(Sachala) 0 HR

94 CRDhan206(Gopinath) 0 HR

95 CRDhan307(Maudamani) 3 MR

96 CRDhan408(ChakaAkhi) 1 R

97 CRDhan310(IET24780) 0 HR

98 CRDhan311(Mukul) 1 RHR-HighlyResistant,R-Resistant,MR-ModeratelyResistant,S-Susceptible,MS-ModeratelySusceptible,HS-HighlySusceptible


ANNEXUREVIII. ResponseofricevarietiesreleasedbyICAR-NRRI,Cuttack,Odishatobrownplanthopper.

Sl.No.

Variety TP DP DP(%) DamageScore

Rating

1 Ratna 21 15 69.0 7 S

2 Saket-4 18 18 100.0 9 HS

3 Kalinga-I 27 27 100.0 9 HS

4 Kalinga-II 17 12 70.5 9 HS

5 Supriya 24 19 79.1 9 HS

6 Indira 21 19 90.4 9 HS

7 Samalei 20 19 95.0 9 HS

8 Sattari 26 26 100.0 9 HS

9 Savitri 22 20 90.9 9 HS

10 Khitish 20 15 75.0 9 HS

11 Kalinga-III 12 6 75.0 9 HS

12 Utkalprabha 17 14 82.3 9 HS

13 Neela 14 13 92.8 9 HS

14 Sarasa 15 13 86.6 9 HS

15 Udaya 26 24 92.3 9 HS

16 Annada 20 16 79.4 9 HS

17 Gayatri 20 16 80.0 9 HS

18 Heera 18 14 80.0 9 HS

19 Kalashree 24 11 46.8 5 MS

20 Kalyani-II 21 15 71.4 9 HS

21 Khira 20 16 77.5 9 HS

22 Moti 21 20 95.2 9 HS

23 Padmini 24 24 100.0 9 HS

24 Panidhan 27 27 100.0 9 HS

25 Tara 16 16 100.0 9 HS

26 Tulasi 27 17 79.5 9 HS

27 Vanaprabha 20 12 58.9 7 S

28 Shaktiman 22 22 100.0 9 HS

29 Lunishree 28 8 29.0 3 MR

30 Sneha 21 20 95.2 9 HS

31 Vandana 19 19 100.0 9 HS

32 DhalaHeera 25 24 96.0 9 HS

33 Radhi 26 16 62.7 7 S

34 Tapaswini 25 24 96.0 9 HS

35 Pooja 19 17 89.4 9 HS

36 Sarala 25 16 82.0 9 HS

37 Durga 21 21 100.0 9 HS

38 Shatabdi 25 25 100.0 9 HS

39 Anjali 25 24 96.0 9 HS

40 Hazaridhan 8 5 81.2 9 HS

41 Sadabahar 15 14 93.3 9 HS

42 Abhishek 28 27 96.4 9 HS

43 Chandrama 21 21 100.0 9 HS

Sl.No.

Variety TP DP DP(%) DamageScore

Rating

44 Virender 28 28 100.0 9 HS

45 Geetanjali 19 19 100.0 9 HS

46 Ketekijoha 30 30 100.0 9 HS

47 Naveen 22 18 81.4 9 HS

48 Rajalaxmi(Hybrid) 19 19 100.0 9 HS

49 Ajay(Hybrid) 26 24 92.3 9 HS

50 Varshadhan 22 20 90.9 9 HS

51 SatyaKrishna(CRDhan10) 16 12 75.0 9 HS

52 Nuakalajeera 20 20 100.0 9 HS

53 NuaDhusara(CRSugandhDhan3) 38 38 100.0 9 HS

54 Chandan(CRBorodhan2) 20 20 100.0 9 HS

55 Hanseswari(CRDhan70) 22 16 74.4 9 HS

56 CRDhan40 16 16 100.0 9 HS

57 Sahbhagidhan 19 19 100.0 9 HS

58 Phalguni 19 18 94.7 9 HS

59 Reeta(CRDhan401) 23 20 86.9 9 HS

60 LunaSampad(CRDhan402) 34 10 29.8 3 MR

61 NuaChinikamini 35 35 100.0 9 HS

62 CRDhan501 26 20 76.9 9 HS

63 CRDhan701 28 26 92.8 9 HS

64 CRDhan601 25 25 100.0 9 HS

65 CRDhan500 22 21 95.4 9 HS

66 Satyabhama(CRDhan100) 29 29 100.0 9 HS

67 Pyari(CRDhan200) 22 21 95.4 9 HS

68 Hue(CRDhan301) 17 17 100.0 9 HS

69 Sumit(CRDhan404) 27 25 92.5 9 HS

70 PoornaBhog(CRBasnaDhan902) 14 14 100.0 9 HS

71 Jalamani(CRDhan503) 22 21 95.4 9 HS

72 JayantiDhan(CRDhan502) 29 27 93.1 9 HS

73 LunaBarial(CRDhan406) 28 28 100.0 9 HS

74 LunaSankhi(CRDhan405) 20 17 85.0 9 HS

75 CRSugandhDhan907 20 17 85.0 9 HS

76 CRDhan300 24 15 63.8 7 S

77 CRDhan303 22 18 89.0 9 HS

78 CRDhan305 20 17 85.0 9 HS

79 CRDhan304 28 19 67.8 7 S

80 CRDhan201 24 24 100.0 9 HS

81 CRDhan202 28 28 100.0 9 HS

82 CRDhan505 23 22 95.6 9 HS

83 CRDhan204 25 24 96.0 9 HS

84 CRDhan306(IET22084) 27 25 92.5 9 HS

85 CRDhan205(IET22737) 17 17 100.0 9 HS

86 CRDhan203(Sachala) 21 20 95.2 9 HS

87 CRDhan206(Gopinath) 23 22 95.6 9 HS

88 CRDhan307(Maudamani) 29 15 75.8 9 HS

89 CRDhan408(ChakaAkhi) 15 9 78.2 9 HS

MR-ModeratelyResistant,S-Susceptible,HS-HighlySusceptible,TP-TotalPlants,DP-DeadPlants


ANNEXUREIX. ResponseofricevarietiesreleasedbyICAR-NRRI,Cuttack,Odishatogallmidge.

Sl.No.

Variety TP SS Percentage ScoreResistance

level

1 Ratna 15 15 100.0 9 HS

2 Saket-4 20 18 90.0 9 HS

3 Kalinga-I 20 8 40.0 7 HS

4 Kalinga-II 18 18 100.0 9 HS

5 Supriya 20 8 40.0 7 HS

6 Indira 25 8 32.0 7 HS

7 Samalei 18 0 0.0 0 HR

8 Sattari 22 20 90.9 9 HS

9 Savitri 15 8 53.3 9 HS

10 Khitish 18 17 94.4 9 HS

11 Kalinga-III 20 18 90.0 9 HS

12 Utkalprabha 15 10 66.6 9 HS

13 Neela 20 10 50.0 7 HS

14 Sarasa 22 6 27.2 7 HS

15 Udaya 16 8 50.0 7 HS

16 Annada 25 25 100.0 9 HS

17 Gayatri 25 25 100.0 9 HS

18 Heera 20 20 100.0 9 HS

19 Kalashree 20 18 90.0 9 HS

20 Kalyani-II 20 20 100.0 9 HS

21 Khira 15 12 80.0 9 HS

22 Moti 15 15 100.0 9 HS

23 Padmini 13 2 15.3 5 S

24 Panidhan 15 10 66.6 9 HS

25 Tara 20 20 100.0 9 HS

26 Tulasi 20 20 100.0 9 HS

27 Vanaprabha 20 15 75.0 9 HS

28 Shaktiman 12 4 33.3 7 HS

29 Lunishree 14 10 71.4 9 HS

30 Sneha 11 8 72.7 9 HS

31 Vandana 10 10 100.0 9 HS

32 DhalaHeera 20 20 100.0 9 HS

33 Radhi 18 8 44.4 7 HS

34 Tapaswini 18 8 44.4 7 HS

35 Pooja 18 10 55.5 9 HS

36 Sarala 20 18 90.0 9 HS

37 Durga 18 16 88.8 9 HS

38 Shatabdi 25 22 88.0 9 HS

39 Anjali 20 10 50.0 7 HS

40 Hazaridhan 15 15 100.0 9 HS

41 Sadabahar 13 10 76.9 9 HS

42 Abhishek 18 10 55.5 9 HS

43 Chandrama 20 6 30.0 7 HS

44 Virender 22 10 45.4 7 HS

Sl.No.

Variety TP SS Percentage ScoreResistance

level

45 Geetanjali 22 10 45.4 7 HS

46 Ketekijoha 18 10 55.5 9 HS

47 Naveen 22 22 100.0 9 HS

48 Rajalaxmi(Hybrid) 22 20 90.9 9 HS

49 Ajay(Hybrid) 20 20 100.0 9 HS

50 Varshadhan 10 10 100.0 9 HS

51 SatyaKrishna(CRDhan10) 15 13 86.6 9 HS

52 Nuakalajeera 18 6 33.3 7 HS

53 NuaDhusara(CRSugandhDhan3) 13 2 15.3 5 S

54 Chandan(CRBorodhan2) 20 8 40.0 7 HS

55 Hanseswari(CRDhan70) 22 8 36.3 7 HS

56 CRDhan40 18 6 33.3 7 HS

57 Sahbhagidhan 20 10 50.0 7 HS

58 Phalguni 15 7 46.6 7 HS

59 Reeta(CRDhan401) 20 20 100.0 9 HS

60 LunaSampad(CRDhan402) 25 22 88.0 9 HS

61 NuaChinikamini 12 12 100.0 9 HS

62 CRDhan501 25 6 24.0 7 HS

63 CRDhan701 20 20 100.0 9 HS

64 CRDhan601 18 10 55.5 9 HS

65 CRDhan500 20 10 50.0 7 HS

66 Satyabhama(CRDhan100) 18 18 100.0 9 HS

67 Pyari(CRDhan200) 17 17 100.0 9 HS

68 Hue(CRDhan301) 14 14 100.0 9 HS

69 ImprovedLalat 20 10 50.0 7 HS

70 ImprovedTapaswini 22 8 36.3 7 HS

71 Sumit(CRDhan404) 18 14 77.7 9 HS

72 PoornaBhog(CRBasnaDhan902) 20 10 50.0 7 HS

73 Jalamani(CRDhan503) 18 13 72.2 9 HS

74 JayantiDhan(CRDhan502) 26 4 15.3 5 S

75 LunaBarial(CRDhan406) 12 12 100.0 9 HS

76 LunaSankhi(CRDhan405) 20 20 100.0 9 HS

77 CRSugandhDhan907 18 10 55.5 9 HS

78 CRDhan300 20 2 10.0 3 HS

79 CRDhan303 22 22 100.0 9 HS

80 CRDhan305 14 6 42.8 7 HS

81 CRDhan304 25 25 100.0 9 HS

82 CRDhan201 14 10 71.4 9 HS

83 CRDhan202 6 2 33.3 7 HS

84 CRDhan505 18 15 83.3 9 HS

85 CRDhan204 14 9 64.2 9 HS

86 CRDhan306(IET22084) 25 7 28.0 7 HS

87 CRDhan205(IET22737) 8 8 100.0 9 HS

88 CRDhan203(Sachala) 15 13 86.6 9 HS

89 CRDhan206(Gopinath) 26 26 100.0 9 HS

90 CRDhan307(Maudamani) 25 25 100.0 9 HS

91 CRDhan408(ChakaAkhi) 20 8 40.0 7 HS

HR-HighlyResistant,S-Susceptible,HS-HighlySusceptible,TP-TotalPlants,SS-SilverShoots


ANNEXUREX. ResponseofricevarietiesreleasedbyICAR-NRRI,Cuttack,Odishatoroot-knotnematode.

Sl.No Variety Galls/rootsystem Gallindex Reaction

1 Kalinga 42.3 4 MS

2 Supriya 128.3 5 HS

3 Indira 136.3 5 HS

4 Sattari 103.6 5 HS

5 Savitri 102.0 5 HS

6 Khitish 32.3 4 S

7 Utkalprabha 105.3 5 HS

8 Neela 117.0 5 HS

9 Udaya 40.6 4 S

10 Annada 42.0 4 S

11 CR1014 11.0 3 MS

12 Dharitri 12.6 3 MS

13 Gayatri 102.6 5 HS

14 Heera 148.3 5 HS

15 Kalashree 37.6 4 S

16 Kalyani-II 108.6 5 HS

17 Moti 113.6 5 HS

18 Padmini 49.3 4 S

19 Tulasi 22.0 3 MS

20 Vanaprabha 39.3 5 HS

21 DhalaHeera 56.0 4 S

22 Radhi 101.6 5 HS

23 Tapaswini 58.6 4 S

24 Pooja 118.3 5 HS

25 Sarala 18.3 3 MS

26 Durga 56.3 4 S

27 Shatabdi 50.0 4 S

28 Hazaridhan 45.0 4 S

29 Chandrama 47.0 4 S

30 Ketekijoha 24.3 3 MS

31 Naveen 41.6 4 S

32 Rajalaxmi(Hybrid) 35.3 4 S

Sl.No Variety Galls/rootsystem Gallindex Reaction

33 Ajay(Hybrid) 101.6 5 HS

34 Varshadhan 112.3 5 HS

35 SatyaKrishna(CRDhan10) 62.0 4 S

36 Nuakalajeera 72.3 4 S

37 NuaDhusara(CRSugandhDhan3) 116.6 5 HS

38 Chandan(CRBorodhan2) 112.6 5 HS

39 SwarnaSub1 49.6 4 S

40 Phalguni 45.0 4 S

41 Reeta(CRDhan401) 7.0 2 MR

42 LunaSuvarna(CRDhan403) 35.6 4 S

43 LunaSampad(CRDhan402) 39.3 4 S

44 CRDhan701 26.0 3 MS

45 CRDhan500 12.3 3 MS

46 Satyabhama(CRDhan100) 102.6 5 HS

47 Pyari(CRDhan200) 82.0 4 S

48 Sumit(CRDhan404) 26.6 3 MS

49 Jalamani(CRDhan503) 13.6 3 MS

50 CRDhan300 25.3 3 MS

51 CRDhan303 4.5 2 MR

52 CRDhan305 107.6 5 HS

53 CRDhan201 128.0 5 HS

54 CRDhan202 117.0 5 HS

55 CRDhan505 19.6 3 S

56 CRDhan204 36.3 4 S

57 CRDhan306(IET22084) 11.3 3 MS

58 CRDhan205(IET22737) 126.6 5 HS

59 CRDhan101(Ankit) 23.6 3 MS

60 CRDhan206(Gopinath) 37.0 4 S

61 CRDhan307(Maudamani) 31.3 4 S

62 CRDhan408(ChakaAkhi) 29.0 3 MS

63 CRDhan409(PradhanDhan) 35.0 4 S

64 CRDhan507(Prasant) 40.6 4 S

65 CRDhan508 32.6 4 S

66 CRDhan506 36.6 4 S

MR-ModeratelyResistant,S-Susceptible,MS-ModeratelySusceptible,HS-HighlySusceptible


ANNEXUREXI. GlycemicindexandresistantstarchcontentofricevarietiesreleasedbyICAR-NRRI,Cuttack,Odisha.

Sl.No Varieties Glycemicindex Resistantstarch(%)

1 Abhishek 70.3 0.8

2 Ajay 63.0 1.2

3 Anjali 63.3 1.3

4 Annada 68.5 0.6

5 Chakaakhi 65.7 0.8

6 Chandan 67.1 0.6

7 Chandrama 71.6 0.6

8 CR1014 69.5 0.8

9 CRDhan101 63.2 1.1

10 CRDhan201 68.6 0.6

11 CRDhan202 67.9 0.7

12 CRDhan203 65.7 0.7

13 CRDhan204 66.1 0.6

14 CRDhan205 73.5 0.4

15 CRDhan300 66.7 0.7

16 CRDhan304 63.9 1.3

17 CRDhan305 61.8 1.3

18 CRDhan310 60.8 1.6

19 CRDhan311 59.5 1.5

20 CRDhan407 64.8 0.9

21 CRDhan500 61.4 1.2

22 CRDhan501 60.3 2.2

23 CRDhan505 59.6 1.5

24 CRDhan508 64.7 1.1

25 CRDhan601 63.8 0.7

26 CRDhan907 61.4 1.4

27 CRDhan908 62.9 1.3

28 CRHR-32 67.3 0.7

29 DhalaHeera 67.2 0.5

30 Dharitri 62.4 1.0


31 Gayatri 60.3 2.9

32 Geetanjali 63.9 1.0

33 Gopinath 61.6 1.4

34 Hanseswari 64.8 1.1

35 Hazaridhan 60.0 2.0

36 Heera 65.3 0.7

37 Hue 76.3 0.2

38 Indira 64.3 1.1

39 Jalamani 64.2 0.8

40 Jaya 66.8 0.7

41 JayantiDhan 59.7 2.4

42 Kalashree 59.1 2.7

43 Kalinga-I 67.2 0.6

44 Kalinga-II 70.7 0.6

45 Kalinga-III 62.8 1.3

46 Kamesh 63.3 1.1

47 Ketekijoha 62.1 1.0

48 Khira 66.5 0.7

49 Khitish 66.8 0.6

50 LalatMas 59.5 1.6

51 LunaBarial 70.1 0.6

52 LunaSampad 63.2 1.1

53 LunaSankhi 65.2 0.7

54 LunaSuvarna 69.5 0.7

55 LuniShree 62.8 1.2

56 Maudamani 63.2 1.0

57 Moti 67.5 0.6

58 Neela 64.1 0.9

59 NuaChinikamini 64.4 0.8

60 NuaDhusara 59.7 1.8

61 NuaKalajeera 61.7 1.7

62 Padmini 64.1 1.0



63 Panidhan 69.3 0.7

64 Phalguni 70.0 0.8

65 Pooja 66.7 0.8

66 Pradhandhan 64.5 0.7

67 Pyari 70.1 0.5

68 Radhi 71.6 0.5

69 Rajalaxmi 62.2 0.9

70 Ratna 60.6 1.8

71 Reeta 62.9 1.1

72 Sadabahar 65.7 0.7

73 SahbhagiDhan 67.8 0.6

74 Saket-4 65.0 0.9

75 Samalei 69.3 0.7

76 Sarala 67.6 0.7

77 Sarasa 62.3 1.1

78 Satabdi 60.6 1.5

79 Sattari 62.4 1.1

80 Satyabhama 65.6 0.7

81 Satyakrishna 64.3 1.1

82 Savitri 58.7 1.9

83 Shaktiman 57.5 2.1

84 Sneha 62.8 1.1

85 Sonamani 62.4 1.3

86 Supriya 58.8 2.0

87 SwarnaSub-1 61.3 2.1

88 Tapaswini 62.4 1.5

89 Tulsi 61.4 1.4

90 Uday 63.1 0.8

91 Utkalprava 65.0 0.7

92 Vanaprava 72.5 0.5

93 Vandana 63.2 1.1

94 Varshadhan 63.5 0.8

95 Virendra 62.6 1.3

Rice Varieties of NRRI · 2020-06-06 · Rice varieties are bred for higher yield and imparting...

Documents

Transcript of Rice Varieties of NRRI · 2020-06-06 · Rice varieties are bred for higher yield and imparting...