Rhona O’Connell. Viva voce Oral examination Defence of a theses.
-
Upload
michael-banks -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
3
Transcript of Rhona O’Connell. Viva voce Oral examination Defence of a theses.
An end in sight Surviving the Viva!
Rhona O’Connell
Viva voceOral examination
Defence of a theses
Reasons why PhD viva is required
To check whether it is your own work
To check your understanding of the work
To check whether it is worthy of a PhD
Other issuesDefend the thesis!
Locate study in broader context
Opportunity to clarify unclear or weak areas
Ability to reflect critically on the work
And alsoUnderstanding
that you're ready to become an independent researcher
Relationship to other workthat you have a command of your subject-area
Originality – what is ‘new’ about this work
Best time . . .?Submission of our work
No more to be done
Time on your hands
Other peoples’ comments . . .?
Preparation for viva
Where to start . . .
PreparationRead and re read – take notes
Anticipate the questions you'll be askedgeneric and specific
Be familiar with the literature used and some you haven’t!
Who are the examiners? what is their interests?
Have confidence in your work and your ability to defend it
Know your thesis . . .Familiarity with the literature and
debates about the topicPrepare to justify and defend
decisions madeHighlight the strengths and
implications of the studyConsider what could be done
differently Consider the implications of this
study for further work or for ‘practice’
ConsiderAny new literature (or any missed!)
Any publications prior to completion are helpful
Programme of further study?
Reflect on existing skillsConfidence at oral presentationsWhat are your strengths when discussing our
work?What are your weaknesses?Have you been asked ‘difficult’ questions
about your work?Have you explained your work well to others?Have you had feedback on your
performance?How do you handle criticism?How do you handle pressure?
On the dayHave breakfast . . .
Know where to go and arrive early
Bring a copy of thesis – write all over it/ ‘post-it’ notes /triggers
Prepare to summarise your study
Know who will be present . . .Internal + external examiner
Supervisor present Someone on ‘your side’?Take notes, provide feedback, provide
supportOr not . . .
Independent chair/university official
Duration . . .
Tips Relax and enjoy it, if possible! Listen carefully to the questions and take your
time answering them. Provide enough information as relevant and avoid
going off at a tangent. Handling difficult questions:
If you don't understand, ask for clarification.. Treat vague questions as opportunity to tell the
examiners what you think might be of interest If you really can't answer a question:
Be honest and say you don’t know If it's about literature you haven't come across, thank the
examiner and ask for a reference.
ExaminersWill be prepared and will have read your
work in detail
Examiners will usually agree in advance which areas they will focus on
Be aware of their research interests and previous publications
Various approaches to questioning
Sequential approachFrom literature review through to discussion
Thematic approachBroad areas to more specific
Page by page approach Systematically through each page or section
Opening question???
Summary of study??
Why this topic selected??
Should demonstrate interest and familiarity with your work
Prepare for the expected . . . Summarise the various areas addressed in
this thesis
What are the interesting components of this work?
Who will be interested in this study?
Did your study turn out as expected?
How will this area of research develop over the next few years and do you see that you will have a role in this?
Also expectedWhy is this subject important?
Who else thinks it is important?
Why has this study not been done before?
What is your contribution to this area of research?
Who will be interested in your findings?
Anticipate questionsLiterature reviewedMethodology
Ontological and epistemological questions?Methods – decisions madeFindings
Potential pitfalls – alternative results possible?Reliability/validity or rigour/ trustworthiness of
dataDiscussion
What is new, interesting, exciting about this study?
Typical Viva QuestionsWhat is the study aboutKey findingsChallenges in undertaking this workImportance of this workWhat is exciting or newAny omissions – what might you do
differentlyLimitationsRecommendations (key)DisseminationImplications for further research
What about the unexpected?What can trip you up?
When you are told that it is over. . .Reprieve from questioning
Relief
Awaiting judgement . . .
Possible resultsPhD awarded
Awarded with minor revisions
Referral - major revisions required
No award or recommendation for lower degree (MPhil)
Post vivaVarious experiences
Relief FrustrationExhaustion DelightedAnti-climax . . .
Are there corrections / changes to be made . . .
Follow on work to graduation Procedures . . .
Timelines . . .
Revisions . . .
AppealsAll Universities have appeal mechanisms
Ascertain grounds for appeal – usually related to irregularities of procedures not academic judgment of examiners
FinallyNot about surviving the viva
but . . .an opportunity on how to do justice to yourself and your research
and . . .perhaps even to enjoy the
event!