RHETORICAL ANALYSIS & WRITING USING SOAPSTONE TO STRUCTURE AND ANALYZE ARGUMENTS.
-
Upload
darcy-booker -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of RHETORICAL ANALYSIS & WRITING USING SOAPSTONE TO STRUCTURE AND ANALYZE ARGUMENTS.
RHETORIC
AL ANALY
SIS &
WRIT
ING
US
I NG
SO
AP
ST
ON
E T
O S
TR
UC
TU
RE
AN
D A
NA
L YZ
E A
RG
UM
EN
TS
MODES OF DISCOURSE
Description: depicts images verbally in space and time, arranging those images in a logical pattern such as spatial or by association.
Narration: tells a story or relates an event, organized by chronological and spatial order, what, when, where
Exposition: informs or instructs, presents ideas or “truths” objectively.
Persuasion: convincing audience, proving or refuting a point of view or issue. Organized by deduction or induction.
KINDS OF EXPOSITION ORGANIZATION
Comparison
Contrast
Cause and effect
Classification
Division
Definition
PURPOSE
Support a cause
Promote change
Stimulate interest
Refute a theory
Win agreement
Arouse sympathy
Provoke anger
AUDIENCE: WHO IS IT?
Knowledge
Beliefs
Expectations
What do they disagree with
Language usage-jargon, formal, archaic, anecdotal, warm, familiar?
Questions need to address?
Inductive reasoning—general to specific
Deductive reasoning—specific to general
Syllogism
Cite common beliefs, cultural traditions
Allusions to history, lit, religious text, myth
Expert testimony
Analogies/Metaphors
Chronological order
Order of importance
Provide evidence
Classify evidence
Cite authority
Quote research
Use facts
Theorize about cause and effect
Argue from set precedent
LOGICAL APPEALS (LOGOS)
Show self as trustworthy
Demonstrate research time
Support reasons with logical evidence
Show craftsmanship in argument structure
Show self as concerned
Show self as knowing and respecting audience
Convincingly show self as knowledgeable and reliable
ETHICAL APPEAL--ETHOS
Use sensory details
Use bias or prejudice
Anecdote
Connotative language—used specifically for effect
Use euphemisms or explore euphemisms
Use description
Use figurative language
Develop specific tone
Use/experiment with language—esp. informal.
EMOTIONAL APPEALS--PATHOS
Don’t claim to be able to solve the whole complex problem.
The more complex the problem, the less likely your essay is a “miracle cure.”
Don’t oversimplify. This hurts your ethos.
Support your argument with CONCRETE evidence and SPECIFIC propositions
Common Logical Fallacies
Ad populum
Begging the question
Circular reasoning
Either/or reasoning
Hasty generalization
Non sequitur
Pedantry
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Propaganda
LOGICAL FALLACIES: ERRORS IN REASONING
INTRODUCING AN ARGUMENT
Attention Grabber
Present issue/topic with CONCRETE example or anecdote
Provide background
Define terms (specialized)
State claim—We call this your thesis.
CONCESSION AND REFUTATION
Writers can’t ignore the opposing side of an argument. MUST address it.
Concession acknowledges the opposition Refutation presents argument against opposition.
“Yes…but” part of your paper Can be structured to ALL appear in intro Can be addressed point by point in body
CONCLUSION
Satisfying wrap up
Restates claim
Provides appeal to needs or values
Can enrich with additional commentary
Call to action/change thought
DO NOT REPEAT INFORMATION
CONFIRMATION
Provides the REASONS and EVIDENCE for writer’s claim. Longest part of argument Shows logic of argument Uses rhetorical devices Develops argument
Not just logos Pathos—esp. to human values or needs
WORKS CONSULTED
College Board (2002). The AP Vertical Teams Guide for English 2nd edition.