Rey Anne
-
Upload
fret-ramirez-coronia-rn -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Rey Anne
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORMFor the rating period of January 2015 to June 2015
EMPLOYEE : _REYANNE C PARALE RNMUNICIPALITY:___ Rodriguez
PART I. PERFORMANCE
Work-KRA/ Activity Unit of Measure/indicatorTARGETS RATINGS
QUANTITY QUALITY TIME SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE
(%) Target Accomp. Target Accomp. Target Accomp. QN QL T APS EPS QN QL T APS EPS
32% #DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
A.1 Attendance to pre-natal cases 30 85.00 20
A.2Attendance / Assistance to Deliveries
A.3 Attendance to Post Natal Care 10 85.00 30
Total Equivalent Point Score (EPS)
Multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation (70%)
Weighted Average Score (WAS) ### #DIV/0! WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend: PERC Action:
QN - Quantity
QL - Quality
DENNIS B. VILLANUEVA, RN REYANNE C PARALE RN FEB. 13, 2015 T - Time
Rater Ratee Date APS - Ave. Point Score
EPS - Equivalent Point Score
POSITION : _ NDP NURSE I________
Weight Allocation
Total Number of Targets for
Activity A.Average % for
Activity AAverage time for
activity A
A. Assists in the implementation of various health programs of the local Gov't Unit in accordance with the program goals and objectives of the DOH and the Health Sector.
Qty:Number Attendance to Pre-Natal attended Qlty:% Accuracy (effectivity,Safetiness) Time:No. of minutes per attendance
Qty:Number of attendance / Assistance to deliveries Qlty:% Accuracy (effectivity,Safetiness) Time:No. of minutes (or hours) per attendance /assistance
Qty:Number of attendance to Post Natal Care Qlty:% Accuracy (effectivity,Safetiness) Time:No. of minutes (or hours) per attendance
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORMFor the rating period of January 2015 to June 2015
MUNICIPALITY:___ Rodriguez
PART I. PERFORMANCE
Work-KRA/ Activity Unit of Measure/indicatorTARGETS RATINGS
QUANTITY QUALITY TIME SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE
(%) Target Accomp. Target Accomp. Target Accomp. QN QL T APS EPS QN QL T APS EPS
A.4 Participate / Assist in EPI
BCG 35 86% 15Hepa at Birth
70 70 89% 10OPV 70 89% 10Measles 30 85% 10
MMR 30 85% 10
13% 10 85% 40
5% 3 85% 30
5% 3 85% 40 #DIV/0! ### 0.00
Total Equivalent Point Score (EPS)
Multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation (70%) ### 0.00
Weighted Average Score (WAS)
WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend: PERC Action:
QN - Quantity
QL - Quality
DENNIS B. VILLANUEVA, RN REYANNE C PARALE RN FEB. 13, 2015 T - Time
Rater Ratee Date APS - Ave. Point Score
EPS - Equivalent Point Score
EMPLOYEE : _REYANNE C PARALE RNPOSITION : _ NDP NURSE I________
Weight Allocatio
n
Qty:Number of EPI Participation / Assistance per antigen Qlty: % effectivity Time:No. of minutes per participation/assistance
B. Conduct Health Program Education / Advocacy (Breast Feeding, Family Planning, Healthy Lifestyle, Resp. pet ownership etc)
QTY: No. of HE/ Advocacy Conducted Qlty: % effectivity Time: No. min (hrs) per activity
C. Assist in screening of presumptive TB cases, Admission of TB Cases & follow up of enrolled TB Cases
Qty: Number of screening,Admission & follow ups conducted Qlty: % effetiveness Time: No of minutes per follow up
D. Conduct HL related diseases screening activities(CVD,DM,Ca, etc)
Qty: No. of HL Screening Conducted Qlty: % Accuracy Time:No. of minutes(hrs) per client
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORMFor the rating period of January 2015 to June 2015
EMPLOYEE : _REYANNE C PARALE RNMUNICIPALITY:___ Rodriguez
PART I. PERFORMANCE
Work-KRA/ Activity Unit of Measure/indicatorTARGETS RATINGS
QUANTITY QUALITY TIME SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE
(%) Target Accomp. Target Accomp. Target Accomp. QN QL T APS EPS QN QL T APS EPS
10% 5 85.00 45 #DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5% 3 85.00 45 #DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5% 5 88.00 45 #DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
10% 3 85.00 45 #DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
10% 6 90.00 DEADLINE #DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
5% 2 85.00 60 #DIV/0! ### #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Total Equivalent Point Score (EPS)100% Multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation (70%) ### #DIV/0!
Weighted Average Score (WAS)
WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend: PERC Action:
QN - Quantity
QL - Quality
DENNIS B. VILLANUEVA, RN REYANNE C PARALE RN FEB. 13, 2015 T - Time
POSITION : _ NDP NURSE I________
Weight Allocatio
n
E. Assist in recording, report analysis & reporting (ex.FHSIS)
Qty: No.Assistance provided Qlty: % Effectivity Time: No. of minutes(hrs) per Assistance
F. Provide Assistance in the conduct of disease surveillance
Qty: No. of Assistance provided Qlty: % Effectivness /Acceptability Time: No. of minutes(hrs) per Assistance
G. Assists in the supervision and monitoring of the CHT
Qty: No. of Assistance provided Qlty: % Effectivity / Acceptability Time: No. of minutes(hrs) per Assistance
H. Assists in the conduct of regular monitoring and evaluation of the various
health programs for the community
Qty: No. of Assistance provided Qlty: % Effectivity / Acceptability Time: No. of minutes(hrs) per Assistance
I. Timely Submission of monthly accomplishment reports, DTR and other rerports as required to include incidental reports to the CHD
Qty: No. of Submitted Reports as required Qlty: % completeness and Acceptability Time: Deadline
J. Perform other related functions in accordance with NDP AO
Qty: No. of activity conducted Qlty: %effectivness / acceptability Time: No. of hrs/activity
Rater Ratee Date APS - Ave. Point Score
EPS - Equivalent Point Score
### #DIV/0!
Part II. Critical Factors ( 30 % )Behavioral Factors Self Rating ( 15 %) Supervisor Rating ( 70 % ) Subordinate Rating Peer Rating ( 15 % )
A1. COURTESY #DIV/0!2. HUMAN RELATIONS #DIV/0!3. INTEGRITY #DIV/0!4. STRESS TOLERANCE #DIV/0!5. INITIATIVE / RESOURCEFULLNESS #DIV/0!6 COMPLIANCE TO OFFICE RULES AND REGULATIONS #DIV/0!7. PUNCTUALITY AND ATTENDANCE #DIV/0!
Total Point Score ( TPS ) Divide by number of entries Average Point Score #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION BY THE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR
Strong Point Weak Point Recommendations
SUMMARY OF RATINGSAverage Percentage Weight Allocation Weighted Ave. Average Percentage Weigth Allocation Weighted Ave.
RATER Point Score With Without Score(WAS) Point Score With Without Score (WAS)(Part 1) Subordinate Subordinate Part 1 Part II Subordinate Subordinate Part II
Supervisor Rater #DIV/0! 60% 65% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 70% 70% ###Self- Rater #DIV/0! 30% 35% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 10% 15% ###Subordinate - 10% 10%Peer Rater - #DIV/0! 10% 15% ###
Total Weighted Average Score ( TWAS) #DIV/0! ###
Total Weighted Average Score (WAS) x 70% Part I = X 70% = #DIV/0! Total Weighted Average Score (TWAS) x 30% (Part II) x 30% = #DIV/0! Total Overall Score ( TWAS) Part 1 + TWAS Part II) #DIV/0! Add : Intervening Task ( If Any ) ________ Find Numerical Rating 8.00 Adjectival Rating VS
Jan-15 ___________________________________ _______________ Rater Ratee Date Confirmed by Next Higher Date
Supervisor
PERC Chairman
8. LEADERSHIP ( for supervisors only )