Revision TKR: Why Knee Fails Basic Surgical Principles Dr.Sandeep Agrawal Agrasen Hospital Gondia...
-
Upload
sandeep-agrawal -
Category
Science
-
view
604 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Revision TKR: Why Knee Fails Basic Surgical Principles Dr.Sandeep Agrawal Agrasen Hospital Gondia...
1
Why TKR Fails: Revision Total Knee Replacement Basic Principles
Dr.Sandeep Agrawal Agrasen Hospital Gondia Maharashtra India [email protected]
Why Knees Fail
1. Infection 2. Extensor lag 3. Stiffness 4. Tibio-Femoral Instability (Collateral Lig. Incompetence) 5. Fracture 6. Loose of femur or tibia (or progression of disease in uni knee) 7. Patella instability & Malrotation 8. Breakage 9. Pain- No Diagnosis
Why Knees Fail
Infection !Standard work up including bloods, aspiration, nuclear scans !Two - Stage Revision
Why Knees Fail
Extensor lag !Quads rupture probably best treated with allograft. !If superimposed infection may need an arthrodesis
Why Knees Fail
Stiffness Global Flexion contracture Poor flexion !Need to address Quads scarring and balance Flex & Ext gaps
Why Knees FailTibio-Femoral Instability If ligaments are present, they must be correctly tensioned and balanced by choosing the correct prosthesis size and positioning it correctly. In many cases, constraint will not be necessary. If the ligaments have failed, a constrained implant still needs perfect alignment
Why Knees Fail
Fracture !Commonly of the femur in the supracondylar region. Risk factors include:
i) osteopenic bone, ii) a notch in the anterior femoral cortex, iii) poor flexion.
!Can be successfully reconstructed with refined techniques of internal fixation. !In others, however, the bone quality is so poor that revision knee arthroplasty with distal femoral allograft or prosthetic replacement is essential.
Why Knees Fail
Loose femur or tibia !Radiolucencies Subsidence progression of disease in uni knee
Why Knees Fail
Patella instability & Malrotation
Why Knees Fail
8. Breakage !!9. Pain- No Diagnosis
Principles of Revision
1. Diagnosis 2. Revise… don’t repeat 3. Use Revision Implants 4. Complete Revision 5. Couple tibia to femur 6. Medullary Fixation 7. Control Alignment
3 Step Technique1.Tibial platform !2. Knee in Flexion: Femoral rotation !B. Femoral component size !C. Joint line !3. Knee in extension
!
Couple the tibia & femur !
Soft tissues !
Is constraint required?
ExposureAttention to detail !• Synovectomy • Re-establish gutters • Lateral retinacular release • Liberate quads from femur • Gentle manipulation • Quads split
Removal
1. Oscillating saw 2. Reciprocating saw 3. Stacked osteotomes
Implantation
!Tibial with stems. !Knee in Flexion
A. Femoral rotation B. Femoral component size C. Joint line
!Knee in extension (tension ligaments)
Step 1
Re-establish Tibial Platform
Step 2:
Stabilize Knee in Flexion !Rotation: Transepicondylar axis !B. Stability: Femoral component size !C. Joint Line: Inferior pole patella
Femoral Componentsizing
Implant to restore ligaments (LCCK)
Extension Gap position
Flexion Gap Size
Femur controls the soft tissues
Femoral Componentsizing
• Augments to fit bone
Joint Line :Inferior pole patella above Joint Line
Step 3
Stabilize in Extension Distal defect defined
Constraint!!Constraint should only be used in revision total knee arthroplasty after the principles of extension, flexion gap and medial and lateral collateral ligament balancing are performed.
Constraint
!As little constraint as possible should be used. !If stability cannot be obtained progressive levels of constraint should be tested and used in the revision construct.
Constraint
!If there is functional loss of the medial or lateral collateral ligament or if there is an inability to balance the flexion or extension gap, a constraining condylar device that provides varus valgus stability should be used.
Rotating Hinge
!!Rotating hinged implant should be considered when both collateral ligaments are incompetent because of massive femoral bone loss and in the elderly patient with genu recurvatum
95% BW is loaded through the condyles
BW load does not shift posteriorly through full ROM
Shear forces are reduced with rotation platform
Dislocation !“RHK designs with a short,tapered central rotating stem should be used with caution in patients with bone and soft tissue compromise that may allow excessive distraction and implant dislocation.” (JBJS March 2003)
LEARNING MESSAGE
Establish the cause for failure Have revision implants Adequate exposure and removal Build the knee from the Tibia Femur controls tissue tension and joint line Use more constraint if needed Rotating Hinge for gross instabilty and bone loss
32
33
Secret of Life