REVISED ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILEmedia.metro.net/board/Items/2015/02_february/20150219...Jan -Dec Jan...
25
Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza zi3.g2z.2000 Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA gooiz -z95z metro.net 2 2 Metro REVISED SYSTEM SAFETY, SECURITY ~ OPERATIONS COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 19, 2015 SUBJECT: MONTHLY UPDATE ON TRANSIT POLICING PERFORMANCE ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE RECOMMENDATION Receive and file monthly update on transit policing performance. ISSUE On September 4, 2014, the board requested that staff provide a monthly update on transit policing performance to Systems Safety and Operations Committee. Specifically, the board requested monthly updates on criminal activity, fare enforcement, response time, deployment and perception of safety. DISCUSSION Staff is providing the following updates to each of the requested items: Criminal Activity: System-wide, Part 1 Crimes have increased by 1.4 %from January 2014 - December 2014 compared to January 2013 - December 2013. The Blue and Expo Lines had a decrease in Part 1 Crimes per 1,000,000 riders from the same period last year, while the Green, Red, and Gold Lines had an increase. Part 1 Crimes per 1,000,000 Riders 2014 2013 2012 2011 Jan -Dec Jan -Dec fan -Dec Jan -Dec Blue 13.4 ~ 15.5 14.1 12.6 Green 25.8 Q 24.3 20.1 19.4 Red 4.8 4' 4.1 4.0 3.1 6.2 6.0 4.3 5.3 Expo 15.2 ~ 18.9 20.1 WA Orange 7.3 7.3 6.0 4.7 Silver 3.1 ~ 2.1 2.7 N/A Bus 1.70 '' 1.37 1.3 1.1 Arrow iudicaY~s an increase or decrease fi-o~n last year. Monthly Transit Policing Contract Performance Update
Transcript of REVISED ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILEmedia.metro.net/board/Items/2015/02_february/20150219...Jan -Dec Jan...
Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza zi3.g2z.2000 TelMetropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA gooiz-z95z metro.net 2 2Metro
REVISEDSYSTEM SAFETY, SECURITY ~ OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
FEBRUARY 19, 2015
SUBJECT: MONTHLY UPDATE ON TRANSIT POLICING PERFORMANCE
ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file monthly update on transit policing performance.
ISSUE
On September 4, 2014, the board requested that staff provide a monthly update ontransit policing performance to Systems Safety and Operations Committee. Specifically,the board requested monthly updates on criminal activity, fare enforcement, responsetime, deployment and perception of safety.
DISCUSSION
Staff is providing the following updates to each of the requested items:
Criminal Activity:
System-wide, Part 1 Crimes have increased by 1.4%from January 2014 - December2014 compared to January 2013 - December 2013. The Blue and Expo Lines had adecrease in Part 1 Crimes per 1,000,000 riders from the same period last year, whilethe Green, Red, and Gold Lines had an increase.
Part 1 Crimes per 1,000,000 Riders
2014 2013 2012 2011
Jan -Dec Jan -Dec fan -Dec Jan -Dec
Blue 13.4 ~ 15.5 14.1 12.6
Green 25.8 Q 24.3 20.1 19.4
Red 4.8 4' 4.1 4.0 3.1
6.2 6.0 4.3 5.3
Expo 15.2 ~ 18.9 20.1 WA
Orange 7.3 7.3 6.0 4.7
Silver 3.1 ~ 2.1 2.7 N/A
Bus 1.70 '' 1.37 1.3 1.1
Arrow iudicaY~s an increase or decrease fi-o~n last year.
Monthly Transit Policing Contract Performance Update
Overall, buses had an increase in Part 1 Crimes per 1,000,000 riders from the sameperiod last year, or for every 3,000,000 million riders we had 1 more Part I Crimescompared to last vear.
....... .
. ■
• As of September 2014, the Bus Riding Team was re-established to target busrelated crime.
Fare Enforcement:
In December 2014, law enforcement performed 642,652 fare checks on the railsand Orange Line, a decrease of 45,103 fare checks compared to November2014.
On average day, there are 185 LASD personnel on the Metro system, which iscomprised of 142 deputies and 43 security assistants. LAS D's personnel areconcentrated heavily on rail, 77°/o of personnel are deployed to rail. The currentrail deployment for LASD personnel is as follows: 37% Blue Line, 11 %GreenLine, 11 %Expo Line, 23% Red Line, 14% Gold Line, 4°/o Orange Line. Fareenforcement contacts are disproportionately much higher on northern rail lines(Red, Gold and Orange) than they are on the southern rails (Blue, Green andEXPO). In the month of November, LASD exceeded fare enforcement contracttarget goals on the Red line by 16% and are nearly at the contract target goal forthe Gold line at 95°/o. While these numbers reflect a diligent effort in ensuringmonthly contract goals, the southern lines do not reflect the same type of effort.The Blue line contract goal is only at 44% while the Expo line is hovering around64°/o. The only southern line that is nearing its goal is the Green line, which is stillonly at 72°/o. In the month of December however the fare enforcement contractgoals for each of the southern lines dropped. The Blue line fell to 41 %, the
Monthly Transit Policing Contract Performance Update
Green line fell to 70%, while the EXPO line fell drastically to 46% of its targetedgoal.
FARE CHEC}C DATA
FARE MONTHLY FARE N9ONTHLY
V CHECKS TARGET TARGET RIDERSHIP CHECKS TARGET TARGET RIDERSHIP
Red/Purple 254,864 220,Qt~0 116°!0 3,938,587 269,907 220,000 123% 4,136,Q63
Blue 92,71{? 212,OOD 4-4°!0 2,177,865 86,213 212,OQ0 41% 2,275,151
Green 95,299 136,t}t3~ 72fl10 1, 11,556 95,Q87 136,OQD 7D9'~ 1,D75,163
C~~a~~-f 1(39,675 116,C?~d 95°fo 1,147,385 85,507 116,00D 75'3~i 1,22,22$
Expo 57,935 9~,[3UQ 64% 797,{]S4 41,11 90,~(()t) 46°!0 89~1~75~i
Qr~n~e 47,135 92,00Q 51% 698,375 45,566 92,(100 51D% ~'i83,47Q
Response Time:
• In December 2014, the average response time for "Calls for Service"(Emergency, Priority, and Routine) for all rail lines and buses is 19.5 minutes.LASD currently comply with Metro's Performance Metrics requirement of average30 minutes for call for service. Specifically, the response time for emergent callwas less than 10 minutes.
Deployment:
• LASD's deployment is based on their Intelligence Lead Policing (ILP) strategy.ILP is policing model created from law enforcement reports, trends and feedbackto identify hot spots that are in critical needs of law enforcement services such ascrime and fare enforcement. From month to month, deputies are redeployed tospecific lines based on the ILP to ensure the safety of Metro patrons. Dataobtained through ILP strategy contains specific bus and rail data, which assistslaw enforcement in the deployment of resources in order to ensure safetythroughout the system.
• In the months of November 2014 and December 2014, Los Angeles MetroProtective Services (LAMPS) and Operations partnered to enhance the safety ofour bus operators and patrons through the use of LASD's Bus Riding Team andperforming special bus fare operations. The result of these operations increasedfarebox revenue by 6-8% at the locations where bus boardings are beingconducted. Staff is continuing to evaluate the performance of these operationsand will make tactical adjustments based on these evaluations.
Perception of Safety:
• Metro Security has worked with Metro Strategic Initiatives department to enhancethe ridership survey to include questions pertaining to safety on-board and whilewaiting at stops and stations. The ridership survey is scheduled to be conductedduring the last two weeks of January.
Monthly Transit Policing Contract Performance Update 3
Operator Safety:
• In spring 2015 the Transit Ambassador program is going to be implemented as apilot program to ensure bus operators are given the proper training to improvecustomer satisfaction and operator safety.
• By June 2015, 268 buses will have video monitors installed. These monitors willassist in deterring fare evasion and assaults on buses.
• By the end of February, operator protective barriers will be delivered andinstallation will begin in 123 buses which will protect bus operators from potentialthreats.
• Deterring fare evasion on the bus system is extremely labor and cost intensive.As of January 2015, Transit Security Officers (TSO) have been deployed at highboarding locations in order to facilitate fare compliance. Currently, a pilotprogram is in place at Division 10 to identify intersections for TSO's to conductbus hoardings for proper fare. The TSO's will continue to be a visible presenceand remove patrons who are unable or not willing to pay the proper fare.Valuable feedback is being collected from Metro bus operations and additionally,uniform presence is helpful in areas of high fare evasion. TSOs have beenchecking fares (bus hoardings) and have completed fare checks on roughly1,414 buses involving approximately 5,136 passenger hoardings. TAP reportsindicate collections of fares from stored value on TAP cards was up by 5.2°/o andcash collected was up 8.2%due to TSO bus hoardings.
NEXT STEPS
Metro Security will continue working with Metro Strategic Initiatives department toexplore additional methods in order to obtain more data regarding Metro ridershipperception of safety and discuss survey results as they become available. MetroSecurity will also continue the bus policing pilot program with TSOs, which has provedto extremely effective. Metro will continue working with LASD to establish measurableperception of safety criteria. Staff will provide monthly performance updates.
ATTACHMENT
A: MTA Monthly Report
Prepared by: Duane Martin, DEO Project Management, Office of the CEO
Monthly Transit Policing Contract Performance Update
C~~;~~Arthur T. LeahyChief Executive Officer
Monthly Transit Policing Contract Performance Update
Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza zi3.g2z.2000 TelMetropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA gooiz-z95z metro.net 2 2Metro
REVISEDSYSTEM SAFETY, SECURITY ~ OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
FEBRUARY 19, 2015
SUBJECT: MONTHLY UPDATE ON TRANSIT POLICING PERFORMANCE
ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file monthly update on transit policing performance.
ISSUE
On September 4, 2014, the board requested that staff provide a monthly update ontransit policing performance to Systems Safety and Operations Committee. Specifically,the board requested monthly updates on criminal activity, fare enforcement, responsetime, deployment and perception of safety.
DISCUSSION
Staff is providing the following updates to each of the requested items:
Criminal Activity:
System-wide, Part 1 Crimes have increased by 1.4%from January 2014 - December2014 compared to January 2013 - December 2013. The Blue and Expo Lines had adecrease in Part 1 Crimes per 1,000,000 riders from the same period last year, whilethe Green, Red, and Gold Lines had an increase.
Part 1 Crimes per 1,000,000 Riders
2014 2013 2012 2011
Jan -Dec Jan -Dec fan -Dec Jan -Dec
Blue 13.4 ~ 15.5 14.1 12.6
Green 25.8 Q 24.3 20.1 19.4
Red 4.8 4' 4.1 4.0 3.1
6.2 6.0 4.3 5.3
Expo 15.2 ~ 18.9 20.1 WA
Orange 7.3 7.3 6.0 4.7
Silver 3.1 ~ 2.1 2.7 N/A
Bus 1.70 '' 1.37 1.3 1.1
Arrow iudicaY~s an increase or decrease fi-o~n last year.
Monthly Transit Policing Contract Performance Update
Overall, buses had an increase in Part 1 Crimes per 1,000,000 riders from the sameperiod last year, or for every 3,000,000 million riders we had 1 more Part I Crimescompared to last vear.
....... .
. ■
• As of September 2014, the Bus Riding Team was re-established to target busrelated crime.
Fare Enforcement:
In December 2014, law enforcement performed 642,652 fare checks on the railsand Orange Line, a decrease of 45,103 fare checks compared to November2014.
On average day, there are 185 LASD personnel on the Metro system, which iscomprised of 142 deputies and 43 security assistants. LAS D's personnel areconcentrated heavily on rail, 77°/o of personnel are deployed to rail. The currentrail deployment for LASD personnel is as follows: 37% Blue Line, 11 %GreenLine, 11 %Expo Line, 23% Red Line, 14% Gold Line, 4°/o Orange Line. Fareenforcement contacts are disproportionately much higher on northern rail lines(Red, Gold and Orange) than they are on the southern rails (Blue, Green andEXPO). In the month of November, LASD exceeded fare enforcement contracttarget goals on the Red line by 16% and are nearly at the contract target goal forthe Gold line at 95°/o. While these numbers reflect a diligent effort in ensuringmonthly contract goals, the southern lines do not reflect the same type of effort.The Blue line contract goal is only at 44% while the Expo line is hovering around64°/o. The only southern line that is nearing its goal is the Green line, which is stillonly at 72°/o. In the month of December however the fare enforcement contractgoals for each of the southern lines dropped. The Blue line fell to 41 %, the
Monthly Transit Policing Contract Performance Update
Green line fell to 70%, while the EXPO line fell drastically to 46% of its targetedgoal.
FARE CHEC}C DATA
FARE MONTHLY FARE N90NTHLY
V CHECKS TARGET TARGET RIDERSHIP CHECKS TARGET TARGET RIDERSHIP
Red/Purple 254,864 220,Qt~0 116°!0 3,938,587 269,907 220,000 123% 4,136,Q63
Blue 92,71{? 212,OOD 4-4°!0 2,177,865 86,213 212,OQ0 41% 2,275,151
Green 95,299 136,t}t3~ 72fl10 1, 11,556 95,Q87 136,OQD 7D9'~ 1,D75,163
C~~a~~-f 1(39,675 116,C?~d 95°fo 1,147,385 85,507 116,00D 75'3~i 1,22,22$
Expo 57,935 9~,[3UQ 64% 797,{]S4 41,11 90,~(()t) 46°!0 89~1~75~i
Qr~n~e 47,135 92,00Q 51% 698,375 45,566 92,(100 51D% ~'i83,47Q
Response Time:
• In December 2014, the average response time for "Calls for Service"(Emergency, Priority, and Routine) for all rail lines and buses is 19.5 minutes.LASD currently comply with Metro's Performance Metrics requirement of average30 minutes for call for service. Specifically, the response time for emergent callwas less than 10 minutes.
Deployment:
• LASD's deployment is based on their Intelligence Lead Policing (ILP) strategy.ILP is policing model created from law enforcement reports, trends and feedbackto identify hot spots that are in critical needs of law enforcement services such ascrime and fare enforcement. From month to month, deputies are redeployed tospecific lines based on the ILP to ensure the safety of Metro patrons. Dataobtained through ILP strategy contains specific bus and rail data, which assistslaw enforcement in the deployment of resources in order to ensure safetythroughout the system.
• In the months of November 2014 and December 2014, Los Angeles MetroProtective Services (LAMPS) and Operations partnered to enhance the safety ofour bus operators and patrons through the use of LASD's Bus Riding Team andperforming special bus fare operations. The result of these operations increasedfarebox revenue by 6-8% at the locations where bus boardings are beingconducted. Staff is continuing to evaluate the performance of these operationsand will make tactical adjustments based on these evaluations.
Perception of Safety:
• Metro Security has worked with Metro Strategic Initiatives department to enhancethe ridership survey to include questions pertaining to safety on-board and whilewaiting at stops and stations. The ridership survey is scheduled to be conductedduring the last two weeks of January.
Monthly Transit Policing Contract Performance Update 3
Operator Safety:
• In spring 2015 the Transit Ambassador program is going to be implemented as apilot program to ensure bus operators are given the proper training to improvecustomer satisfaction and operator safety.
• By June 2015, 268 buses will have video monitors installed. These monitors willassist in deterring fare evasion and assaults on buses.
• By the end of February, operator protective barriers will be delivered andinstallation will begin in 123 buses which will protect bus operators from potentialthreats.
• Deterring fare evasion on the bus system is extremely labor and cost intensive.As of January 2015, Transit Security Officers (TSO) have been deployed at highboarding locations in order to facilitate fare compliance. Currently, a pilotprogram is in place at Division 10 to identify intersections for TSO's to conductbus hoardings for proper fare. The TSO's will continue to be a visible presenceand remove patrons who are unable or not willing to pay the proper fare.Valuable feedback is being collected from Metro bus operations and additionally,uniform presence is helpful in areas of high fare evasion. TSOs have beenchecking fares (bus hoardings) and have completed fare checks on roughly1,414 buses involving approximately 5,136 passenger hoardings. TAP reportsindicate collections of fares from stored value on TAP cards was up by 5.2°/o andcash collected was up 8.2%due to TSO bus hoardings.
NEXT STEPS
Metro Security will continue working with Metro Strategic Initiatives department toexplore additional methods in order to obtain more data regarding Metro ridershipperception of safety and discuss survey results as they become available. MetroSecurity will also continue the bus policing pilot program with TSOs, which has provedto extremely effective. Metro will continue working with LASD to establish measurableperception of safety criteria. Staff will provide monthly performance updates.
ATTACHMENT
A: MTA Monthly Report
Prepared by: Duane Martin, DEO Project Management, Office of the CEO
Monthly Transit Policing Contract Performance Update
C~~;~~Arthur T. LeahyChief Executive Officer
Monthly Transit Policing Contract Performance Update
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
TRANSIT POLICING DfVlS1G1Al(-~GN~IV~ M. AN17A, c~r~i~F
Y ~i_Y L'4 f~~~
~~~~~ ~Ji
Metro
MTAMONTHLY REPORT
December 2014
Prepared by the Crime Analysis Unit
<̀_~ LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
~' ~ TRANSIT POLICING DIVISIONRON~N,E M. A1VDA, CHfEF
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Monthly Statistics
Summary..................................................................................... .
Part 1 Crimes by Month - Rail ............................................................
Part 1 Crimes by Month - Bus ............................................................
BlueLine ....................................................................................
GreenLine ..................................................................................
RedLine .....................................................................................
GoldLine ....................................................................................
ExpoLine ....................................................................................
OrangeLine ................................................................................
SilverLine ...................................................................................
BUS.............................................................................................
UnionStation ....................................................................
3
4
5
6
s9
10
11
12
13
14
Reserve Company Services ..................................................... 15
TRANSIT POLICING DIVISION - December 2014
Dec Crimes - 310 YTD Crimes - 3910
ioo iaooSelected Part 2 - 158 ~"~ -~~-~-'-- ~
90 ~ ~ ---.- ._--_ _ Selected Part 2 - 2060 ---- -----
~-' .Partl-152 -' -T- 1200 ('gp ~ __ r Part 1-1850 ,_ _ .___
~o ~.- - _____.~.- --_ _..._
i000 ~~ ~ 799__ ----69 ----- _ _._._ _---- ----___~_,_--- ------
60 ~/__._.._._._
800 '~ :x -a..
50 ~'~ -'- -'-'-'- .~.._---~.f..___..~__.__._.. _._.~.---
ao ,, 22 ,~., - --- ---- __ ---- eoo 408 t _, .-_
9 __ _ - -- -- - ~_ao 24 ~ ~ aoo 166 304
_ _ .. --zo r 11
- --- 13 - ~ zoc 132
.. _
~ 6". _._""_
ba~~io
Blue Green Red Gold Expo Orange Silver Bus Union Blue Green Red Gold Expo Orange Silver Bus Union
56 41 41 26 19 8 2 99 18~ ~~4 500 537 218 226 147 19 1349 140
Part 1 Crimes eer 1.000.000 Riders
2014
Jan -Dec
2013
Jan -Dec
2012
Jan -Dec
2011
Jan -Dec
Blue 13.4 ~ 15.5 14.1 12.6
Green 25.8 ~ 24.3 20.1 19.4
Red 4.8 Q 4.1 4.0 3.1
6.2 6.0 4.3 5.3
~xga~ 15.2 '~' 18.9 20.1 N/A
Orange 7.3 8 7.3 6.0 4.7
Silver 3.1 ~` 2.1 2.7 N/A
Bus 1.70 * 1.37 1.3 1.1
arrow ~naicates an increase or decrease from last year.
Dec Citations - 6723 YTD Citations - 103635
floc Arraete _ dd7 VTfI Arrcctc _ R(ld7
Dec Calls For Service - 2288
0 500 1000 1500 2000 0 10,000 20,000_~
30,0000 500 1000~i
Blue Blue Blue~7d~
Green Green I Green
Red Red ~ Red
Gold Gold Gold
Expo Expo Expoi
Orange 5 Orange Orange 9
Silver 6 Silver 155 Silver 16
Bus Bus Bus
$Union 74 Union 642 Union
SATURATION RATEDecember GOLD EXPO T07'A~
Ridership 2,275,151 1,075,163 4,136,063 1,220,228 841,756 683,470 10,231,831
Fare Checks' 86,611 95,298 271,324 87,454 41,461 60,504 642,652
%Passengers Inspected 3.81% 8.86% 6.56% 7.17% 4.93% 8.85% 6.28%
Boardings 499 379 826 480 352 1,146 3,682
Rides 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fare Warnings 391 123 589 303 132 75 1,613
YTD GOLD EXPO '`:O~tG~ TOTAL
YTD Ridership 27,276,448 12,967,234 48,724,670 13,828,334 9,818,029 8,742,205 121,356,920
YTD Fare Checks' 1,558,670 1,151,247 2,734,264 1,099,500 743,434 747,929 8,035,044
%Passen ers Ins ected 5.71% 8.88% 5.61°/ 7.95% 7.57°/ 8.56% 6.62%
Boardin s 16,189 10,264 33,897 16,140 10,438 29,816 116,744
Rides 0 D 0 0 0 231 231
Fare Warnings 10,714 5,056 20,167 10,622 5,278 1,986 53,823
Fare checks are calculated by adding MPV checks, triple/doubles, fare evasion cites, and fare warnings
3
YTI~ C;allc Fnr Sarvira - ~7~A1
Svstem-Wide Hishli~hts
Part 1 Crimes have increased by 1.4% from
tan -Dec 2014 compared to Jan -Dec 2013.
The Blue and Expo lines had a decrease in
part 1 crimes per 1,000,000 riders from the
same period last year, while the Green, Red,
and Gold lines had an increase.
Overall, buses had an increase in part 1
crimes per 1,000,000 riders from the same
period last year.
Transit Policing DivisionMonthly Activities Report - December, 2014
*Part 1 Crimes by Month -RailRIIIP I IfIP .lan I Feb I Mar I Aor I Mav I Jun I Jul I Aua I Seo I Oct I Nov Dec I YTD
Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Fla e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Robbe 8 5 7 10 4 7 9 3 8 6 4 9 80
A Assault 2 1 72 4 7 9 6 5 5 9 5 6 71
~Agg Assail[ on Op
Bur la0?
0
0
0
0
0
J
0
0
00
00
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
00
01
Grand Theft 22 1 5 8 9 70 9 12 ti 70 3 9 114
~P.e~tt~' Theft
G~ TA -- _~BTFV
3
00
4
~4d
4
~t1
4
i
3
1
2
S
7
01
2
31
4
3
3
4
07
4
22
5
2
3~
4
33st
46~21
____(Arson 0rTotal ~—__~ 36
0
i3
0
30
0
_ 30
0~29
0
35
J
3v
0
_ 30 ~
0~
30
0
33
027
034
0
366
Green Line Jart Feb Mar r Mav Jun Jul Au Se Ocf Nov Dec YTD
Homicide 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rae 0 0 0 0 1 0 ~0 0 0 0 1 0 7
Robbe 12 5 4 2 11 7 7 S t5 72 6 9 98
A Assault o 3 4 3 4 0 2 1 0 7 0 2 26
A Assault on O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bur la 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Grand Theft 8 2 2 5 12 13 2 17 5 8 9 9 92
Pett Theft 5 3 2 3 2 4 4 2 3 4 2 0 34
GTA 2 6 0 2 4 1 3 5 3 4 8 9 47
BTFV 2 5 2 1 1 1 9 5 3 0 7 3 33
Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 35 25 15 16 35 26 27 38 29 29 27 32 334
Red LineHomicide
Jan
1
Feb
0
Mar
0
A r
0
Ma
0
Jun;;
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Rae 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Robbe 3 1 2 2 6 1 6 1 3 7 4 3 39
A Assault 6 3 6 6 6 3 6 10 8 4 4 1 63
A Assault on O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bur la 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 3
Grand Theft 2 1 5 4 4 5 6 6 6 6 3 3 51
Peri Theft 6 5 6 3 2 5 5 2 3 6 74 7 64
GTA 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5
BTFV 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 5
Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 22 10 21 i6 20 14 23 20 27 24 25 17 233
Gold Line Jan Feb Mar r Ma Jun Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec YTD
Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robbe 0 1 1 7 1 2 0 1 0 0 2 1 70
A Assault 1 0 1 0 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 3 9
A Assault on 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bur la o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Grand Theft 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 8
Pett Theft 3 1 0 2 1 2 0 3 1 3 2 3 21
GTA 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 1 8
BTFV 3 2 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 5 3 7 29
Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 9 4 2 7 4 12 4 8 2 10 9 15 86
Ex Line Jan Feb Mar r Ma Jun Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec YTD
Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robbe 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 7 7 5 6 26
A Assault 1 2 0 1 0 1 3 0 0 6 0 2 16
A Assault on 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bur la 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Theft 3 0 3 4 2 6 4 4 9 6 13 7 61
Pett Theft 3 4 3 4 1 2 5 2 3 1 7 0 35
GTA 0 1 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 7 0 1 5
BTFV 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 6
Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total t 1 8 8 11 5 10 15 8 13 17 26 17 149
* Part 1 Crimes are calcuated in accordance with the FBI Uniform Crime Report standards.Homicides, Rapes, and Aggravated Assaults are counted by the number of victims.
Transit Policing DivisionMonthly Activities Report - December, 2014
Part 1 Crimes by Month -Bus1 n_____ ~ :__ I ~__ I ~_~ I ..__ I w.. I .._.. I ~.... I 1..1 I A.... I Ce.. I M. I u.... I ne.. I VTn
Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robbe 2 0 0 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 9
A Assault 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
A Assault on 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0
Bur la 0 0 0 ~J I 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 1
Grand Theft 0 2 0 0 9 I 0 1 0 3 2 0 18
Pett Theft 1 0 0 7 7 1 2 1 5 c 2 0 28
GTA ^ 0~ 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0~ 0 1 1 0 7_
BTFV 0 0 ~0 0 0 Y 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Arson ~.`.
0 0 0 C U 0 0 ~0 0 0 0 G 0
...., ̀ 4 2 6 S i2 8 3 2 5 6 7 1 64
Silver Line ~ Jan Feb Mar Ma Jun Jul Au ~e Oct Nov Dec YTD
Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rae 0 0 1 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Robbe 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 4
A Assault 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
A Assault on O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bur la 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Theft 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
Pe Theft 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2
GTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BTFV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 7 2 0 3 0 0 4 0 1 7 7 73
.:.:-..~:. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rae ,. 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Robbe 77 6 4 3 S 4 70 70 15 8 10 6 95
Fl~r~.ASSauIt 74 8 6 11 5 24 17 11 16 8 18 7 145
Aqp Assault on 5 0 4 1 3 1 1 3 3 2 5 7 29
Bur la 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 4
urantl Tlieit,;.,:-~:'~~ 10 10 12 11 18 14 74 17 9 18 8 8 147
Pei[ TheB:< 7
uTA 0BTFV 1
7
01
500
8 142 00 1
17
11
6
30
17
02
7
12
1322
12
01
71
0
1081011
nrsaFl ,~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 049 32 31 36 50 56 51 54 55 52 54 30 550
Union Station Jan Feb Mar r Ma Jun Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec YTD
Homicide 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Robbe 0 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4
A Assault 1 1 1 7 0 1 1 1 1 7 0 1 10
A Assault on O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bur la 0 0 2 0 1 0 7 0 0 2 0 1 7
Grand Theft 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 8
Pett Theft 1 3 0 1 1 2 2 5 5 1 1 3 25
GTA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BTFV 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 2 5 4 2 5 4 5 8 7 5 3 5 55
Total Jan Feb Mar r Ma Jun Jul Au Se Oct Nov Dec YTD
Homicide 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Rae 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 7
Robbe 39 20 27 21 33 25 34 26 42 34 35 35 365
A Assault 32 18 30 26 24 39 37 30 30 29 27 22 344
A Assault on 0 5 0 4 1 3 1 1 3 3 2 5 1 29
Bur la 7 1 3 1 3 0 1 0 3 4 0 2 19
Grand Thek 47 76 28 34 58 52 38 60 41 49 44 36 503
Pe Theft 29 28 26 32 23 34 26 30 31 34 45 25 363
GTA 4 it 2 5 9 3 11 8 4 12 13 16 98
BTFV 8 12 4 6 8 10 13 15 7 13 9 15 120
Arson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 168 106 119 126 163 765 161 172 162 777 179 152 1850
5
Tran
sit Po
lici
ng Division
Mont
hly Ac
tivi
ties
Rep
ort - December, 2014
REPORTED CRIME
PART 1 CRIMES
Dec
YTD
Homicide
01
Rape
01
Robb
ery
980
Agg Assault
671
Agg Assault on Op
00
Burglary
01
Gran
d Theft
9114
Pett
y Theft
446
Motor Ve
hicl
e Theft
321
Burg/Theft From Veh
icle
331
Arson
00
SUB-TOTAL
34
366
Selected Par
t 2 Crimes
Battery
496
Batt
ery Ra
il Operator
01
Sex Offenses
215
Weapons
229
Narc
otic
s6
109
Tres
pass
ing
3115
Vand
alis
m5
43
SUB-TOTAL
22
408
TOTAL
56
774
ARRESTS
Type
Dec
YTD
Felony
43
495
Misdemeanor
122
1485
TOTAL
165
1980
CITATIONS
Type
Dec
YTD
Fare
Evasion Citations
1,04
717,468
Othe
r Ci
tati
ons
106
1,642
Vehicle Code Cit
atio
ns177
3,601
TOTAL
1,33
022,711
500
~___. _
_~_
Part 1 Crimes - YTD
45o
~.__
__ _____
400
____
__,_
__43
8_
408
366
350
___._._ ._
._. _._._ _..
__.--
300
315
250
__
__
__
_~.~_..._._~_
_
200
253
__--C}—YTD Tot
als
150
Part
1 Cri
mes - 2014
""""
' ~
—*5 Yr Avg
50
_ _..
_ ~~_~_
100
36
30
30
29
35
33 '~3~
34 'i
_ _____,.~_
__._
____
_19
o~r--
5~_.
__ _
, _—.T ___
_ ~
,_~_
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
o ~_
_ ~~~~.~_______._.____
2009
2010
2011
1012
2013
2014
`5 yr av
erag
e is
based on the
ave
rage
of part 1 cri
mes from 2009 - 201
3.
CALLS FOR SERVICE
TYPE
Dec
YTD
Total
Avg
Total
Avg
Emergency
27
4.4
253
5.5
Priority
175
12.0
2122
13.1
Routine
198
25.3
2514
24.4
Tota
l400
18.1
4889
18.5
FARE ENFORCEMENT
Dec
YTD
Ride
rshi
p2,
275,
151
27,276,448
Fare Checks
86,6
111,
558,
670
of Pat
rons
Ins
pect
ed3.81
5.71
Boar
ding
s499
16,1
89Ri
de0
0Fare War
ning
391
10,714
D
Tran
sit Po
lici
ng Div
isio
nMo
nthl
y Activities Rep
ort
- December, 2014
REPORTED CRIME
PART 1 CRIMES
Dec
YTD
Homicide
00
Rape
02
Robb
ery
998
Agg Ass
ault
226
Agg Assault on Op
00
Burglary
02
Grand Theft
992
Petty Theft
034
Moto
r Vehicle Theft
947
Burg
/The
ft From Veh
icle
333
Arso
n0
0SUB-TOTAL
32
334
Selected Part 2 Crimes
Batt
ery
342
Batt
ery Ra
il Ope
rato
r0
1Sex Off
ense
s0
5Weapons
014
Narc
otic
s2
61Trespassing
118
Vandalism
325
SUB-TOTAL
9166
TOTAL
41500
ARRESTS
Type
Dec
YTD
Felony
27
257
Misdemeanor
45
584
TOTAL
72
841
CITATIONS
Type
Dec
YTD
Fare
Eva
sion
Citations
885
8,62
4Other Citations
80
976
Vehi
cle Code Citations
411,
209
TOTAL
1,00
610
,809
E C
F ;
1't
r
350
--~ _ ___
____
_ .
Part
1 Crimes - YTD
300
297
298
250
248
zoo
- _
_.
150
- _
--
--
100
50
Part 1 Crimes - 2014
50
26
27
38
29
"" 32
o -r—i
—,
r ,—~
- —,i—,
Jan
Feb
Mar A r
Ma
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
~
,.r~~... _
_ ...
.
2009
2010
2011
2012
'5 yr av
erag
e is based on th
e av
erag
e of
part 1 crimes from 2009 - 20
13.
CALLS FOR SERVICE
TYPE
Dec
YTD
Tota
lAvg
Tota
lAvg
Emergency
76.6
116
5.9
Prio
rity
59
10.7
834
12.9
Rout
ine
110
21.2
1419
20.9
Total
176
17.1
2369
17.3
FARE ENFORCEMENT
Dec
YTD
Ride
rshi
p1,075,163
12,9
67,2
34Fare Checks
95,298
1,151,247
of Patrons Inspected
8.86
8.88
Boardings
379
10,264
Ride
00
Fare War
ning
123
5,05
6
290.
2
—4—YTD Totals
*5 Yr Avg
2013
2014
Tran
sit Po
lici
ng Division
Mont
hly Ac
tivi
ties
Rep
ort
- December, 2014
REPORTED CRIME
PART 1 CRIMES
Dec
YTD
Homi
cide
01
Rape
02
Robb
ery
339
Agg Assault
163
Agg Assault on Op
00
Burglary
13
Grand Theft
351
Pett
y Theft
764
Motor Ve
hicl
e Theft
15
Burg
/The
ft From Veh
icle
15
Arso
n0
0SUB-TOTAL
17
233
Selected Part 2 Crimes
Batt
ery
886
Battery Rail Ope
rato
r0
0
Sex Offenses
124
Weapons
114
Narcotics
8110
Tres
pass
ing
322
Vandalism
348
SUB-TOTAL
24
304
TOTAL
41537
ARRESTS
Type
Dec
YTD
Felony
21332
Misdemeanor
73
1001
TOTAL
94
1333
CITATIONS
Type
Dec
YTD
Fare Evasion Cit
atio
ns1,512
21,1
66Ot
her Ci
tati
ons
158
1,606
Vehicle Code Cit
atio
ns143
1,69
9TOTAL
1,813
24,471
zso
Part
1 Crimes -YTS
~~.~z3s
',,
zoo
~-_.
~ ._
m___
__
__~_____
`~ z-
~a—.
_3
193
,.~.~
164.6
150 ~__.~ ~..
_
--
-
__.~.~..a__. __. _
_ .._
~ ~__~__ ~__
--
j 145
146
~ 129
iooj
....-.
_
_...~_
.._~ .
~n_.
_._~
___.
__.__.
... __
.... _
__,__
------
._._.____ __~__,._~__.____ _
____
... ___._
___
__--
-- .._
____
~_._
_._.
_.___W
__
__
-----
--~
____
_ ~YTDTotals
50
Par4 1 Crimes - 2014
~o
*S Yr Avg
so
_~ __
_~_ .
_~ _~_
~-r
„21
16
20;~
_ —17
0
C :.
Mar
Apr May
Jun
Jui
Auk Sep
Oc~
N~:.
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
'5 yr average
is based on the
average of part 1 crimes from 2009- 2013.
CALLS FOR SERVICE
TYPE
Dec
YTD
Total
Avg
Tota
lAvg
Emergency
7
4.7
157
5.5
Priority
226
16.0
2309
15.5
Routine
217
29.6
2421
25.2
Tota
l450
22.4
4887
20.0
FARE ENFORCEMENT
Dec
YTD
Ride
rshi
p4,136,063
48,724,670
Fare
Checks
271,
324
2,73
4,26
4
of Pat
rons
Inspected
6.56
5.61
Boardings
826
33,8
97
Ride
00
Fare
Warning
589
20,167
s
Transit Policing Division
Monthly Activities Report
- December, 2014
REPORTED CRIME
PART 1 CRIMES
Dec
YTD
Homicide
00
Rape
00
Robbery
110
Agg Ass
ault
39
Agg Ass
ault
on Op
00
Burg
lary
01
Grand Th
eft
08
Petty Th
eft
321
Moto
r Ve
hicl
e Th
eft
18
Burg
/Theft From Veh
icle
729
Arso
n0
0SUB-TOTAL
15
86
Selected Part 2 Crimes
Batt
ery
125
Battery Rail Ope
rato
r0
0
Sex Offenses
06
Weapons
09
Narcotics
232
Trespassing
04
Vand
alis
m8
56
SUB-TOTAL
11132
TOTAL
26
218
ARRESTS
Type
Dec
YTD
Felony
10
108
Misd
emea
nor
28
391
TOTAL
38
499
CITATIONS
Type
Dec
YTD
Fare
Eva
sion
Cit
atio
ns656
10,692
Other Citations
94
1,13
7Ve
hicl
e Code Cit
atio
ns68
796
TOTAL
818
12,625
A100
---
Part
1 Crimes -YTD
90________
cso
---c>
--
s6
~o- —
--80------
60
~ -- -- ---
-- — _ _~ __
__
_ ___
__.._
_-----
61
63
58.8
50
~~--
-_~—
________._______~~.
-----_ _---
40
—
30
Z~
Part
1 Cr
i 2014
15
~
--f.~_—~, v YTD Totals
20
g
~
g
10 9
--
0
4
~
4
4r
~
—~
'~
*SYrAvg
10
r
r
i ~
~ r ~
_.____
_
Jan
Feb
Mar A r
Ma
Jun
1ul
Au
Se
Oct
Nov D c
o----
------
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
~ i
'S yr av
erag
e is bas
ed on the ave
rage
of part 1 cri
mes from 2009 - 2013.
CALLS FOR SERVICE
TYPE
Dec
YTD
Total
Avg
Tota
l Avg
Emergency
6
5.7
69
7.2
Priority
71
15.7
836
16.1
Routine
73
20.6
855
25.2
Total
150
17.7
1760
20.1
FARE ENFORCEMENT
Dec
YTD
Ridership
1,22
0,22
813
,828
,334
Fare Checks
87,4
541,099,500
of Pat
rons
Inspected
7.17
7.95
Board
i ngs
480
16,140
Ride
00
Fare War
ning
303
10,622
Gold
Lin
e Hi
~hli
~hts
The Gold Li
re had 6 more par
t 1 crimes,
whic
h is an 8%increase from the same
period las
t year.
Part 1 cri
rnes
per 1,0
00,0
00 riders were up
from the
same period
last
year.
Tran
sit Po
lici
ng Division
Monthly Activities Rep
ort - December, 2014
REPORTED CRIME
PART 1 CRIMES
Dec
YTD
Homi
cide
00
Rape
00
Robbery
626
Agg Ass
ault
216
Agg Ass
ault
on Op
00
Burglary
00
Grand The
ft7
61Pe
tty Th
eft
035
Moto
r Ve
hicl
e Th
eft
15
Burg/Theft From Veh
icle
16
Arson
00
SUB-TOTAL
17
149
Selected Part 2 Crimes
Battery
122
Batt
ery Rail Ope
rato
r0
0
Sex Off
ense
s0
3
Weapons
02
Narc
otic
s0
27
Tres
pass
ing
05
Vandalism
118
SUB-TOTAL
277
TOTAL
19
226
ARRESTS
Type
Dec
YTD
Felony
898
Misdemeanor
26
213
TOTAL
34
311
CITATIONS
Type
Dec
YTD
Fare
Evasion Cit
atio
ns334
6,227
Othe
r Ci
tati
ons
32
385
Vehi
cle Code Cit
atio
ns48
1,08
0TOTAL
414
7,692
'~ `1
'txpo une opened
in Apr
a zo
o z.
i he
5 yr average
is not
cal
cula
ted.
CALLS FOR SERVICE
TYPE
Dec
YTD
Tota
lAvg
Tota
lAvg
Emergency
0N/A
54
5.6
Prio
rity
45
11.6
448
11.8
Routine
49
17.6
623
28.3
Total
94
14.7
1125
20.6
FARE ENFORCEMENT
Dec
YTD
Ridership
841,
756
9,818,029
Fare
Checks
41,461
743,
434
of Patrons Inspected
4.93
7.57
Boar
ding
s352
10,438
Ride
00
Fare
War
ning
132
5,278
10
Tran
sit Po
lici
ng Division
Monthly Ac
tivi
ties
Rep
ort - December, 2014
REPORTED CRIME
PART 1 CRIMES
Dec
YTD
Homi
cide
00
Rape
00
Robbery
19
Agg Ass
ault
03
Agg Ass
ault
on Op
00
Burglary
01
Grand The
ft0
18
Pett
y Th
eft
028
Moto
r Ve
hicl
e Th
eft
02
Burg/Theft From Vehicle
03
Arson
00
SUB-TOTAL
164
Selected Part 2 Crimes
Battery
121
Batt
ery Bus Operator
00
Sex Offenses
05
~.~
ELI E
~
~~o--
- --
-_~._.. ..
__—RzT~~-E
r-H~12S---1FT-E
3--- -
--- --
65
_.
_ _ _
60
__~__.
55 so
--
—
--
45
.40
- -----
35
~_~ ---
30
zs-
~~
_ .~ _A.----_____
—___
_ ___
_.._
.._~--
-.--
_ - -
__~
_~..
..._
~. _
__
__ _-----
- —Ey—YT
DTot
als
*5
Z~ is 10
Part
1 Crimes - 2014
--20 —
_ __
g
12
8
_.
p
4 2` 6
3
2
5
6
7
~
_.
__. .
_ •~
Yr Avg
5Ja
n Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
-'"'
--~ ----""""
o=
,__~
i2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
. m_
.._.
__._
w __
______ __.____ _
~~._~.._-
2014
---
-
'5 yr average is based on the average of part 1 cri
mes fr
om 2009 - 2013.
Weapons
16
TYPE
YTD
Narcotics
532
Total
Avg
Trespassing
04
Emergency
30
9.3
Vandalism
015
Priority
421
16.8
SUB-TOTAL
783
Rout
ine
321
25.4
TOTAL
8147
Total
772
20.1
TS
Type
°Dec
YTD
Felony
1 83
Misdemeanor
18
296
TOTAL
379
NS
Type
Dec
YTD
Fare
Evasion Cit
atio
ns132
6,91
3Ot
her Ci
tati
ons
7317
Vehicle Code Cit
atio
ns66
1,20
0TOTAL
205
8,43
0
F~' R ~E
" Fa CEM T .
Dec
YTD
Ride
rshi
p 683,470
8,74
2,20
5Fare Checks
60,5
04
747,929
of Pat
rons
Inspected
Boar
ding
sRide
Fare War
ning
m
8.85
8.56
1,146
29,8
160
231
75
1,986
Orange Lane Hi
~hli
~hts
The Orange Line ha
d 3 le
ss part 1 cri
mes,
which is a 4%
decr
ease
from th
e same period
last year.
Part 1 cri
mes per 1,
000,
000 we
re equal from th
e same per
iod
last yea
r.
Tran
sit Policing Div
isio
nMo
nthl
y Ac
tivi
ties
Rep
ort
- December, 2014
REPORTED CRIME
PART 1 CRIMES
Dec
YTD
Homicide
00
Rape
01
Robb
ery
04
Agg Assault
01
Agg Assault on Op
00
Burglary
00
Grand Theft
04
Pett
y Theft
12
Motor Ve
hicl
e Theft
00
Burg
/The
ft From Veh
icle
01
Arso
n0
0SUB-TOTAL
113
Sele
cted
Par
t 2 Crimes
Battery
00
Battery Bus Ope
rato
r0
1
Sex Offenses
12
Weapons
00
Narc
otic
s0
1Tr
espa
ssin
g0
0Vandalism
02
SUB-TOTAL
16
TOTAL
219
ARRESTS
Type
Dec
YTD
Felo
ny0
9Misdemeanor
230
TOTAL
239
CITATIONS
Type
Dec
YTD
Fare
Evasion Citations
19
Other Ci
tati
ons
566
Vehicle Code Cit
atio
ns0
80
TOTAL
6155
15
13
I Pa
rt 1 Crimes - YTD
_
9
~
—@~YTD Tot
als
—*3 Yr Avg
5
-
--- ____-- -
_ ~ _~.
_ _.
_._ _ __ ___..
O 4
3
— —
5
Part 1 Crimes - 2014 '~~~ 3: ~M-
!_ 4 ~~~
1 -
~ .. _
_ a
T
- ~---~-
—,---1 --
-_
ice., _c
oti
_ nn~r_ n„~_ nn~
,._ i~
~ i~,t_
n~~a_ ~.~_ n~~~,~no~__ _—
-1
~e~rr ------
2oiz
- et
a-_.
~__.
___:__
_._~
`3 yr average
is based on the
average of part 1 crimes fr
om 2011 - 2013.
CALLS FOR SERVICE
TYPE
Dec
YTD
Tota
lAvg
Tota
lAvg
Emergency
11.
09
4.3
Priority
616.7
89
12.1
Rout
ine
918.0
67
21.4
Tota
l 16
16.4
165
15.5
FARE ENFORCEMENT
Dec
YTD
Ridership
327,
259
4,207,473
Fare
Checks
802
47,3
83
of Pat
rons
Inspected
0.25
1.13
Boardings
36
1,55
7
Ride
0478
Fare
Warning
280
12
~3iver ~ir
~e Hi~
hli~
hts
The Silver Line had 5 more par
t 1 cri
mes,
whi
ch is
an increase of
63%from the
same period la
stye
ar.
Tran
sit Po
lici
ng Division
Mont
hly Ac
tivi
ties
Rep
ort - December, 2014
PART 1 CRIMES
7De~
YTD
Homicide
0 ~
0Rape
0 ''
° ~
1Ro
bber
y6
95
Agg Assault
7145
Agg Assault on Op
c1 '
29
Burglary
~0'
4Gr
and Theft
~8'
147
Pett
y Theft
~7
108
Motor Ve
hicl
e Theft
`1
10
Burg/Theft From Veh
icle
~
0
' '11
Arso
n F
0'0
SUB-TOTAL
3Q,
550
Selected Par
t 2 Crimes
Battery
~~2~ ~
' ~~~
214
Battery Bus Operator
'7
112
Sex Offenses
347
Weapons
~3
28
Narcotics
17, ̀
'219
Tres
pass
ing
18
Vandalism
13 _.
171
SUB-TOTAL
69
799
TOTAL
1349
Type
De
~' YTD
Felony
36 ,.
646
Misd
emea
nor
132
1,650
TOTAL
2,296
Type
bec
YTD
Fare Eva
sion
Citations
32
356
Othe
r Ci
tati
ons
27
163
Vehi
cle Code Citations
998
15,581
TOTAL
~.1,Q57_,-
`16,100
----
szs
~_~_ ~
.__~
__ _
_ .
~._...,
_~ ___
m_
Part
1 Cri
mes_
YTD
_.__..
~ ._
: ~,
sso
.~'__
ass
# .
_ ...
~°
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
'5 yr av
erag
e is bas
ed on the av
erag
e of
part 1 cr
imes
from 2009
2013
.
TYPE
Dec
YTD
Total
ATotal
Avg
Emergency
25
8450
7.8
Prio
rity
432
15.,
t 5,
381
15.9
Rout
ine
411
24,
665
26.5
Tota
l10,496
20.3
Ride
rshi
p 25
,207
,892
Fare Checks
91,005
of Patrons Inspected
~ 0.
36Boardings
4,049
e.Ri
de
963
Fare War
ning
- 27'
13
YTD
322,
985,
648
890,531
0.28
50,6
2011,922
4,706
Bus?
The bu
s Li
nes had 90 mor
e pa
rt 1 cri
mes,
whic
h is a 20%increase from the same per
iod
last year.
Part
1 cri
mes per 1,
000,
000 ri
ders
were up
m the same period
last
year.
Tran
sit Policing Div
isio
nMonthly Ac
tivi
ties
Rep
ort - December, 2014
~ `
a ~
`~
a~~
REPORTED CRIME
PART 1 CRIMES
Dec
YTD
Homi
cide
00
Rape
00
Robbery
04
Agg Ass
ault
110
Agg Ass
ault
on Op
00
Burglary
17
Grand The
ft0
8Pe
tty Th
eft
325
Moto
r Vehicle Th
eft
00
Burg/Theft From Veh
icle
01
Arson
00
SUB-TOTAL
555
Sele
cted
Part 2 Crimes
Battery
427
Battery Bus Operator
00
Sex Offenses
14
Weapons
13
Narcotics
434
Trespassing
211
Vand
alis
m1
6SUB-TOTAL
13
85
TOTAL
18
140
ARRESTS
Type
Dec
YTD
Felony
792
Misdemeanor
22
272
TOTAL
29
364
CITATIONS
Type
Dec
YTD
Fare Eva
sion
Cit
atio
ns24
125
Other Ci
tati
ons
20
223
Vehicle Code Cit
atio
ns30
294
TOTAL
74
642
7Part 1 Crimes - YTD
6960
,_ .__. ~.__. ._______~__.
s~ ss
50
~
~
_~~ _ _
_w ~~~ 53.0
40
-
----
A'37
30
---°
--
Part 1 Cri
mes -X014
20
1~
D YTD Tot
als
~~*2 Yf Avg
10
____. _..~
_. __~_
5
4
2
5
4
5
$
7
5
5~
0
r
r-
i -r r—rr.--
..-r'--~-.—.-r—
-----i
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
I_~
~ _._._____...._.
o_
W _
_2012
2013
2014
'2 yr average
is bas
ed on th
e average of
part 1 cr
imes
fro
m 2012 - 201
3.
CALLS FOR SERVICE
TYPE
Dec
YTD
Tota
l Avg
Total
Avg
Emergency
1 4.0
27
2.9
Prio
rity
37
9.3
386
8.7
Rout
ine
37
49.4
415
21.1
Total
75
29.0
828
14.7
Union Station Hi
ghli
ghts
Unio
n Station had 14 less part 1 cri
mes,
which i
s a
20% dec
reas
e from the same period
last yea
r.
14
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
.. TRAN~I i P~L./~ING DIVIS~QIVRC'N~N~ M. ~lNDA, CN~~~
ALLOC~`TI~~ ~F LAVV' ~~I~~~~~~VI~hJ~ S~R~~~~SR~S~i~~'E ~C~IVIi~At~Y ~~~tVI~E~
D~~e~nber 2~~ 4
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YTD
TSB San Fernando Valley 141 122 170 188 126 134 150 145 157 128 135 137 1733
WestsidelCentral Motors 232 187 252 181 192 252 167 306 238 190 204 176 2577
SGV Volunteer Company 944 634 901 580 606 459 519 534 592 258 420 384 6831
BluelGreen Line Sector 74 68 71 72 56 89 59 65 56 50 59 62 781
TOTAL 1391 1011 1394 1021 980 934 895 1050 1043 626 818 759 11922
'Each month, Reserve totals will display totals from the previous month because totals are not submitted until the end of each month.
The LASD reserve units are attached to regular LASD units of assignments. The reserves are there to perform
the same function as any deputy. In that way, the reserves augment the force at no increase in cost. Contract
agencies benefit significantly by the presence of reserves since they are directly paying for the LASD contract
and do not have to pay for the additional reserve force.
www.lasdreserve.orq.
16
![No More Fake Funder Budgets! Transforming Grantee ......JAN.-DEC. 2012 JAN.-DEC. 2011 ATTENTION ATTENTION Financial Year Analyzed JAN.-DEC. 2012 JAN.-DEC. 2011 Reserves [in Mths] 0.7](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/5fcf0634b04da43c2d3b308c/no-more-fake-funder-budgets-transforming-grantee-jan-dec-2012-jan-dec.jpg)
