Review of 'The History of Canadian Wealth,' by Gustavus Myers - July 5, 1914, in the New York Times
-
Upload
fileandclaw322 -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Review of 'The History of Canadian Wealth,' by Gustavus Myers - July 5, 1914, in the New York Times
-
8/10/2019 Review of 'The History of Canadian Wealth,' by Gustavus Myers - July 5, 1914, in the New York Times
1/1
CANADIAN WEALTHNew York Times (1857-1922); Jul 5, 1914;pg. BR301
CANADIAN
WEALTH
Part
Played
by
Railways
in
Dominion's
Development
HISTORY OF CANADIAN WEALTH.
By
Gustavus
Myers. Chicago:
Charles H.
Kerr
&.
Co.
A
YEAR or
so
ago
Mr.
Myers
gave
himself much
pleasure by laying
bare the
Inmost secrets
of
the
Supreme
Court. The
fact
that a Justice
who leaves
enough
to
pay
a
supertax
is
a
rarity
was
no
bar
to
the scandalous
revelations.
The
vice
of
the Federal
Jus-
tices was
not
venality,
but
a
state
of
mind.
They
were so
steeped
in class
prejudice
that
it
was
not
necessary
to
bribe
them.
Their
dishonesty
was not
pecuniary,
but mental.
They
are
honest
victims of
prejudice
in favor of the
in-
stitutions
which
they
sustain
by
their
decisions. That,
it seems
to uswith
a
change
of
names
is
the
explanation
of
Mr.
Myers's
obsession that vice
is the
motive of whatever he
disapproves. He
thinks there
can
be
no reasonable
and
creditable
explanation
of the
fact, or
at
least of his
assertion, that
fifty
men
control
one-third
of
Canada's
wealth.
They
control it
without
owning
it ,
and
that is
worse than
ownership.
They
are
i
trusted
by
their
countrymen,
and
so
have
power
without
responsibility.
The lead-
ing
railways buy
up
branches and
digest
smaller
companies
at
a
meal.
Twenty-
six banks each have over
a hundred
branches,and some
have several
hundreds
apiece. The United
States
has
no
branch
banks, and
that
alone
proves
that
Can-
ada Is
betrayed
and
impoverished by
its
bankers. That
is to
say, proves
it to
Mr.
Myers
and
to those of his readers
who
agree
with him.
Those who
dis-
agree
are
those
who
believe that
branch
banking
has indisputable
merits,
and is
better than
the
system
of
which the
United States
is
divesting
itself
because
of
its
defects.
The
industrial
concen-
tration is
flagrant.
In four
years
fifty-
six
industrial
amalgamations
absorbed
248
concerns
and
turned 167,000,000
into
457,000,000.
Canada
suffers
no such
pain
as
Mr.
Myers
from these secrets,
whose
knowledge
is
confined
to the own-
ers of
th e
shares and those
who deal
in
them on
the public Exchanges.
The
arid
volumes
beloved of
the
market-place
throw no searchlight
upon
the sources
of
this
iniquity.
That
is
the
function of
Mr. Myers,
and
he has
traced the
cor
ruption
to
its
historic
roots. The
primi-
tive fur
traders put
their
profits
into
land,
and the
land
was
made valuable
by railways.
Myriads
of
documents
were
searched and
their
contents put
into
a
nariative which is
not
misleading
in
substance,
obsolete in treatment,
or
spir-
itless
In
character.
That
is
Mr.
Myers's
estimate of the
writings
of those
who
have
preceded
him in this
fertile
field.
For himself he
is content to
sup-
ply the
ra w
material
for
the
knowledge
necessary
to
obliterate all that
stands
in the
way
of
the
full,
unshackled,
so-
cial,
industrial,
and
intellectual devel-
opment
of
mankind. That
puts
Mr.
Myers
into the same
class with Senator
La
Follette,
who has made similar con-
tributions
toward the
unshackling
of the
United States
from the chains
of
the
Money
Trust.
The
history
of Canadian wealth can
be
cordially
recommended to those who
liked Senator La Follette's
exposure
of
American
wealth.
Never
in
the
history
of mankind have two communities de -
veloped
with such
rapidity
in
all that
goes
to
make life worth
living. They
have
de-
veloped
along
similar
lines,
and that
is
sufficient
explanation
of the faults and
the excesses
of
the
process.
In
both
countries there
are
those
who
cannot
lift their
eyes
above
the mud, and
many
who
delight
to think
that
they,
too,
would
have
been
rich and
great
if
only they
had not been too honest. No doubt
there
are cases where
an excess of virtue em -
barrasses
progress
in
a
worldly
sense,
and
if
the virtue
is
real
there is neither
regret
nor
cause
for
sympathy.
Those
whose
morality
is
truly
robust, and who
are candid with
themselves,
know that
the rich
malefactor
is
the
exception, and
that brains
and
service
are
the
most
common
explanations
of accumulations
of
wealth.
Mr.
Myers's
books
are
recom-
mended
only
to admirers of the muck-
raking
school,
because
only they
believe
that
the
masses
are
poor
because
of un -
willingness
to imitate
the vices attributed
to
the rich.
That doctrine is the root
of
much
envy, hatred,
and
uncharitable-
ness, and
is
noxious
rather than
meri-
torious
In
its effects.
This
is
said
with-
out
disparagement
of
the
apparent
ef-
fort
of Mr.
Myers
to
be
accurate. His
facts
are
not
denied,
but
his
inferences
from them will
not
be admitted
gener-
ally.
All he
says may
be
true,
and
yet
there are other
offsetting
facts
which
compensate
for the blemishes
disclosed.
Admittedly
there
were
graft
and
waste
In
the
construction
of
railways
in
both
Canada and the United
States.
Admit-
tedly
there
has
been
a squandering
of
national
resources
fo r undue
benefit
to
individuals.
But what
then?
The record
would
be clearer
if there were
no
such
facts
upon it
but time
is
of the
essence
in
this
case.
The
haste
which
ordinarily
makes
waste
in this
case made
profits.
Both nations
are
richer and
the
riches
arc
better
distributed
than
would
have
been
the
case
if
railway
construction
had been
delayed
fo r
the
sake
of
pre-
venting
profit
to the
constructors,
and
if
the
public
lands had remained
public
lands,
fit
only
fo r
cattle ranches
rather
than
for
the
.
farms which
belong
to
mill-
ions,
and
which
feed
scores
of millions.
COURTSHIP OF
ANIMALS
THE
COURTSHIP OF
ANIMALS.
By
W. P.
Pycraft
of the
Zoological Dspartment
of
the British Museum. Illustrated.
New
York:
Henry
Holt
&
Co.
91.75.
A
great
many
interesting
facts
are
brought
out
by
W.
P.
Pycraft, an
em
inent
English zoologist,
in
his book en-
titled
The
Courtship of
Animals,
written, he
says,
not
simply fo r the
en
tertainment
of
those who
have a
liking
for
natural
history,
but also
fo r the
bearing
of
what it
shows
upon social
problems
now under animated
discussion
throughout
the world.
It
is
Mr.
Fycraft s
opinion
that
the
truth
of the
saying
that
one touch
of
nature
makes
the whole
world
kin
Is
strikingly obvious
when
we
study
the
courtship
of animals.
For,
he
re
marks,
the
*
Beasts
that
perish,* no
less than man
himself,
are
stirred
by
the
same
emotions;
the
force
of
love runs
as
high
in
them
as in
ourselves; and its
modes of
expression
are
not
so
different,
though
they may
superficially
appear
to
be
so.'* The
proper study
of mankind
lie
thinks
is not man
alone, but
man,
beast,
bird, fish,
and insect.
As a
sociologist
he
insists
on the
pre-eminence of man, clos
ing
his
chapter
on
Mankind
in
the
Making
by remarking
Among
the
civilized nations of
to
day,
in
proportion
as the
maicness
of
the
community becomes
more and
more
effete,
the
victims
of sophistry,
and slaves of the
shibboleths,
so
the
inf.uence
of
the
females asserts itself.
And
recent events
among
us show
plainly
enough
that
that influence
is
the reverse of
good.
Having
its roots
in
personal vanity
and the love
of
notoriety,
ft Is Intolerant
of
reason and
self-restraint, and that
way
madness
lic-s.
There are
something
over
eighty
ex-
cellent
illustrations
In Mr.
Pycraft s
book.
The Family
and Society
A treatise
on
The
Family
and
So
ciety,
written
by
Prof. John M. Gil
lette
of the
University
of
North Da
kota,
is
published
as a
volume
of the
National Social
Science
series. In
it
the
author
deals
Interestingly
with the
functions of
the
family,
the
origin
of
marriage,
the
evolution of the
family,
current
conditions
affecting
the
family,
and
the
biological
phases
of sex
that
are
observed
in the family;
he
says
he
has
taken
his
facts
from
the
best
available
authorities,
and that,
to the
measure
of
h.'s
ability,
his
work
a sci
entific
Interpretation
of
a
large
body
of
reliable data. (A . C,
McClurg
&
Co.
50
cents.)