Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

download Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

of 121

Transcript of Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    1/121

    Review of the austRalian

    goveRnments use of infoRmation

    and communication technology

    sr Pr gr cBe fRe

    August 2008

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    2/121

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    3/121

    Review of the austRalian

    goveRnments use of infoRmation

    and communication technology

    sr Pr gr cBe fRe

    August 2008

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    4/121

    Commonwealth o Australia 2008

    ISBN 1921 1825 87 3 print

    ISBN 1921 1829 03 online

    Department o Finance and Deregulation

    The Australian Government Inormation Management Ofce

    This work is copyright. Apart rom any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced

    by any process without prior written permission rom the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning

    reproduction and rights should be addressed to the

    Commonwealth Copyright Administration

    Attorney Generals Department

    Robert Garran Ofces

    National Circuit

    Barton ACT 2600or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    5/121

    REVIEW OF THE AUSTRALIAN

    GOVERNMENTS USE OF INFORMATION

    AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY

    The Hon. Lindsay Tanner

    Minister for Finance and Deregulation

    Parliament House

    CANBERRA ACT 2600

    Dear Minister

    I have now concluded the Review of the Australian Governments use of Information andCommunication Technology (ICT) which you invited me to undertake on behalf of the

    Government on 25 March 2008, and attach my report for your consideration. The terms of

    reference asked me, amongst a number of issues, to review and report on both the

    efficiency and effectiveness of the Australian Governments current use of ICT, to

    determine whether the Government is realising the greatest return from its investments in

    ICT, and to examine whether the right institutional arrangements are in place to maximise

    the return.

    This report is the outcome of a process in which I have sought to (i) gather a substantial

    body of evidence to understand how ICT is currently used and managed; (ii) analyse the

    evidence to identify significant issues; and (iii) produce recommendations which will

    address these issues. This has involved engagement with the Prime Minister, Ministers,

    across government, and with industry and other interested bodies. During this process,

    112 submissions were received, 63 meetings held, 3 visits made, and 1 large and 2 small

    surveys conducted.

    The outputs of the review provide a snapshot of the current state of ICT in the Australian

    Government.

    At the heart of my findings is a conclusion that, not withstanding the work undertaken to

    date, the current model of weak governance of ICT at a whole-of-government level and

    very high levels of agency autonomy, characterised by an ability to self-approve opt-ins to

    existing whole-of-government ICT arrangements, leads to sub-optimal outcomes in thecontext of prevailing external trends, financial returns, and the aims and objectives of this

    Government. While ICT has undoubtedly benefited government administration and the

    delivery of key public services, I have also found that benefits realisation and the

    measurement of benefits arising from investments in ICT are areas where there is

    substantial scope for improvement, together with measuring and improving the efficiency

    of current ICT operations.

    My recommendations involve a major program of both administrative reform of, and

    cultural change from, a status quo where agency autonomy is a longstanding

    characteristic of the Australian Public Service. Based on my experience of creating

    sustainable change in the United Kingdom public sector environment, there are two

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    6/121

    critical requirements which will determine the success of this reform program: firstly,

    sustained leadership and drive at Ministerial and top official levels and, secondly,

    ensuring the enablers of change are properly resourced, not only in funding terms but also

    with skills of the right calibre.

    Given these two requirements are met, I am confident that the recommended actions and

    changes can be successfully implemented over the next two to three years and deliver

    substantial benefits to the Australian Government.

    Thank you for the opportunity to lead such a stimulating and challenging review. I would

    like to pay tribute to my team of agency and AGIMO secondees whose commitment,

    contribution, professionalism and support made it possible to undertake an exercise of this

    complexity and size in a tight time frame.

    Sir Peter Gershon CBE FREng

    28 August 2008

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    7/121

    Contents

    GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS VIII

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

    Introduction/Context 1

    Methodology 1

    Keyndings 2

    Summaryokeyrecommendations 3

    Implementation 4

    Acknowledgements 6

    INTRODUCTION 7

    CHAPTER 1: VIEWS FROM WITHIN THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT 13

    1.1. ICTinvestmentdecisionmaking 13

    1.2. Projectdelivery 15

    1.3. Organisationalcapability 18

    1.4. People 19

    1.5. ManagingICTspend 20

    1.6. ProcurementandICToutsourcing 22

    1.7. Useobestpractice 23

    1.8. Viewsonexistingwhole-o-governmentarrangements 27

    1.9. Viewsondatacentres 29

    1.10. ViewsontheICTindustry 30

    1.11. ICTarrangementsinministerialoces 30

    CHAPTER 2: VIEWS FROM OUTSIDE THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT 31

    2.1. BetterutilisationoICTassets 31

    2.2. Sharedservices 34

    2.3. Standardised/coordinatedapproachtoprocurement 35

    2.4. Useocommercialo-the-shelsolutions 35

    2.5. Needorstandardisation 36

    2.6. Whole-o-governmentgovernance 36

    2.7. Highcostsotendering 37

    2.8. TheAustralianGovernmentcomparedtoothergovernments 39

    contents

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    8/121

    Contents

    2.9. Skillsshortage 39

    2.10. GreenICT 40

    2.11. Securityclearances 412.12. Bestpractices 41

    CHAPTER 3: SUMMARY OF SURVEY FINDINGS 45

    3.1. Surveyapproach 45

    3.2. Surveyresults 45

    CHAPTER 4: KEY FINDINGS 55

    4.1. Weakgovernanceopan-governmentissuesrelatedtoICT 55

    4.2. AgencygovernancemechanismsareweakinrespectoocusonICTeciencyandunderstandingoorganisationalcapabilitytocommission,manageand

    realisebenetsromICT-enabledprojects 57

    4.3. ThebusinessasusualICTundinginagenciesisnotsubjecttosucient

    challengeandscrutiny 58

    4.4. DisconnectbetweenthestatedimportanceoICTandactionsinrelationto

    ICTskills 58

    4.5. Thereisnowhole-o-governmentstrategicplanordatacentres.Intheabsence

    osuchaplan,thegovernmentwillbeorcedintoaseriesoadhocinvestments

    whichwill,intotal,costsignicantlymorethanacoordinatedapproach 60

    4.6. TheGovernmentICTmarketplaceisneitherecientnoreective 61

    4.7. ThereisasignicantdisconnectbetweentheGovernmentsoverallsustainability

    agendaanditsabilitytounderstandandmanageenergycostsandthecarbon

    ootprintoitsICTestate 61

    CHAPTER 5: RECOMMENDATIONS 63

    5.1. Recommendation1Strengthenpan-governmentgovernance 63

    5.2. Recommendation2StrengthenAgencyGovernance 66

    5.3. Recommendation3TightenthemanagementoICTbusinessasusualunding 68

    5.4. Recommendation4EnhancethemanagementotheAPSICTskillsbase 70

    5.5. Recommendation5DataCentres 72

    5.6. Recommendation6Improvetheeciencyandeectivenessothe

    ICTmarketplace 73

    5.7. Recommendation7SustainabilityoICT 75

    CHAPTER 6: IMPLEMENTATION 77

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    9/121

    Contents

    APPENDICES 87

    A TermsoReerence 87

    B Submissionquestions 89C Surveyinstrument 92

    D Submissionsreceived 95

    E Consultations 99

    F AgencieswithICTspendover$20millionin200708 102

    G AgencieswithICTspend$2millionto$20millionin200708 103

    H Candidatesorwhole-ogovernmentapproaches 104

    I Proposedcriteriaorwhole-o-governmentapproachesandarrangements

    subjecttoopt-out 105J ProposedroleoAGIMO 106

    K LinkagebetweenTermsoReerenceandRecommendations 107

    L DetailsoICTReviewTeam 109

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    10/121

    Glossary

    GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

    ABS AustralianBureauoStatistics

    ACT AustralianCapitalTerritoryAGD Attorney-GeneralsDepartment

    AGIMO AustralianGovernmentInormationManagementOce

    AIIA AustralianInormationIndustryAssociation

    ANAO AustralianNationalAuditOce

    APS AustralianPublicService

    APSC AustralianPublicServiceCommission

    ATO AustralianTaxationOce

    BAU businessasusualBPTC BusinessProcessTransormationCommittee

    CEO ChieExecutiveOcer

    CIO ChieInormationOcer

    CIOC ChieInormationOcerCommittee

    CIOF ChieInormationOcerForum

    CMMI CapabilityMaturityModelIntegration

    COBIT ControlObjectivesorInormationandRelatedTechnology

    COTS commercialo-the-shel

    Deence DepartmentoDeence

    DEWHA DepartmentotheEnvironment,Water,HeritageandtheArts

    EPEAT ElectronicProductEnvironmentalAssessmentTool

    Finance DepartmentoFinanceandDeregulation

    FMAAct FinancialManagementandAccountabilityAct1997

    FMIS nancialmanagementinormationsystem

    GMS grantsmanagementsystem

    GOTS governmento-the-shel

    GTS GovernmentTechnologySurvey

    HRMIS humanresourcemanagementinormationsystem

    HR humanresources

    HVAC heating,ventilationandair-conditioning

    ICON IntraGovernmentCommunicationsNetwork

    ICT inormationandcommunicationtechnology

    IP intellectualproperty

    ITIL InormationTechnologyInrastructureLibrary

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    11/121

    Glossary x

    MoG machineryogovernment

    NPP newpolicyproposal

    OGC OceoGovernmentCommercePM&C DepartmentothePrimeMinisterandCabinet

    PMBOK ProjectManagementBodyoKnowledge

    PRINCE2 ProjectsinControlledEnvironments

    PSPC ProtectiveSecurityPolicyCommittee

    PUE powerusageeectiveness

    SCICT SecretariesCommitteeonICT

    SIGB SecretariesICTGovernanceBoard

    SME smallandmediumenterpriseSOA serviceorientedarchitecture

    SRO SeniorResponsibleOcial

    Treasury DepartmentotheTreasury

    UK UnitedKingdom

    US UnitedStates

    XBRL ExtensibleBusinessReportingLanguage

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    12/121

    x

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    13/121

    ExecutiveSummary

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    INTRODUCTION/CONTEXTOn11April2008,theMinisterorFinanceandDeregulation,theHon.LindsayTanner

    MP,announcedmyappointmenttoleadareviewotheAustralianGovernmentsuseo

    inormationandcommunicationtechnology(ICT).

    METHODOLOGY

    InresponsetotheTermsoReerence,Iemployedanevidence-basedapproachtothereview.

    Therewasaneedtogainacomprehensiveunderstandingothestatusquoinorderto

    determinethescopeor,andidentiyareaso,improvementoeciencyandeectiveness.

    Therehavebeenthreemainphasestothereview:

    Evidence gathering:Iinvitedsubmissionsromagencies,industryandotherkeystakeholders

    ontheuseoICTwithingovernment.Intotal,112submissionswerereceived.Ialsoissueda

    comprehensivesurveyto100Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997(FMAAct)

    agenciesrequestingdataonICTexpenditure,withdetailedquestionsoncostsperdesktop,

    websites,thetopologyandcostotelecommunicationsnetworks,useohumanresource

    andnancialmanagementinormationsystems,grantmanagementsystemsandenergy

    consumption.Inaddition,twosmallsurveyswereconducted.

    Consultation: ThreevideoconerenceswereheldwithPortolioSecretariesintheearlystages

    othereview,ollowedbyaseriesomeetingsinJulyandAugustwiththePrimeMinister,

    Ministers,agencies,industryandotherstakeholders.Intotal,63meetingswereheld.In

    addition,threevisitsweremade,onetotheAustralianHighCommissioninLondonand

    twotodatacentresinCanberra,tounderstandinmoredetailcertainpointsraisedbysome

    submissionsandmeetings.

    Analysis and reporting:Theevidence,supplementedbyadditionalinputssuchastheAustralian

    BureauoStatistics200203GovernmentTechnologySurvey,wasanalysedtoidentiykeyndings.Recommendationswerethendevelopedtoaddresstheidentiedndingsand,nally,

    thisreportwasproducedwithintherequestedtimerame.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    14/121

    ExecutiveSummary

    KEY FINDINGS

    Aterdetailedanalysisotheevidence,thereviewidentiedtheollowingkeyndings.

    1. Thereisweakgovernance1opan-governmentissuesrelatedtoICT.

    2. AgencygovernancemechanismsareweakinrespectotheirocusonICTeciencyand

    anunderstandingoorganisationalcapabilitytocommission,manageandrealisebenets

    romICT-enabledprojects.

    3. Thebusinessasusual(BAU)ICTundinginagenciesisnotsubjecttosucientchallenge

    andscrutiny.

    4. ThereisadisconnectbetweenthestatedimportanceoICTandactionsinrelationtoICTskills.

    5. Thereisnowhole-o-government2strategicplanordatacentres.Intheabsenceosucha

    plan,theGovernmentwillbeorcedintoaseriesoadhocinvestmentswhichwill,intotal,costintheordero$1billionmorethanacoordinatedapproachovera15-yearperiod.

    6. ThegovernmentICTmarketplaceisneitherecientnoreective.

    7. ThereisasignicantdisconnectbetweentheGovernmentsoverallsustainabilityagendaand

    itsabilitytounderstandandmanageenergycostsandthecarbonootprintoitsICTestate.

    Attheheartothesendingsisaconclusionthatthecurrentmodeloveryhighlevelsoagency

    autonomy,includingtheabilitytosel-approveopt-instowhole-o-governmentapproachesinthe

    ICTdomain,leadstosub-optimaloutcomesinthecontextoprevailingexternaltrends,nancial

    returns,andtheaimsandobjectivesothecurrentGovernment.Theimpactothisautonomy

    hasbeenheightenedbyapreviouslackostrongocusonwhole-o-governmentICTissuesatbothMinisterialandtopociallevels.Thisconclusionappliesnomatterhowwell-intentioned

    individualagenciesareintheirpursuitowhole-o-governmentoutcomes.

    ThecurrentmodelooperationisveryclosetotreatingFMAActagenciesasthoughtheywere

    independentprivatesectorentities.Theagenciesare,however,verydierentinanumbero

    aspects:theyareundedbythetaxpayer,theycannotgobankrupt,theyhaveverylittleor

    nothingothetime=moneydynamicotheprivatesector,andtheyhavenosimplebottomline

    outcomesagainstwhichtheirsuccessorailurecanbemeasured.

    AgainstthebackgroundotheGovernmentsobjectivesandthepressurestoimproveeciencyandeectivenesswhereverpossible,Iconsidersomerebalancingbetweenagencyautonomy

    andcoordinationacrossgovernmentisbothdesirableandnecessaryinmeasuresrelatedto

    ICT.SuchamoveisinlinewithtrendsintheUnitedKingdom(UK)andUnitedStates(US)

    Governments,aswellaslargeprivatesectororganisations.

    1 Governance is defned as the system by which the current and uture use o IT is directed and controlled. It involvesevaluating and directing the use o IT to support the organisation and monitoring this use to achieve plans. Itincludes the strategy and policies or using IT within an organisation (Source: AS 8015-2005 Corporate Governanceo ICT). The generally accepted principles o public sector governance according to the Australian National AuditOfce (ANAO) include accountability, transparency, integrity, stewardship, efciency and leadership (Source: ANAO(July 2003), Better practice guide: Public sector governance and the individual ofcer).

    2 In this report the term whole-o-government is used to mean all government agencies or a signifcant subseto them where there is a common issue which is important but not universal to all agencies.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    15/121

    ExecutiveSummary

    SUMMARY OF KEY RECOMMENDATIONS

    Theollowingcomprisetheprimaryrecommendationsothisreview.Thecompletelisto

    mydetailedrecommendationsisoundatChapter5othisreport.AsummaryohowtherecommendationsmeettheTermsoReerencecanbeoundatAppendixK.

    Governance

    EstablishaMinisterialCommitteeonICTtoberesponsibleorthekeywhole-o-government

    ICTpoliciesandtheoverallstrategicvisionorhowICTshouldsupporttheachievementothe

    Governmentsoutcomesandwiderpolicyagenda.

    CreateaSecretariesICTGovernanceBoard(SIGB)withastrongmandateromthe

    Governmenttodrivetheagreedrecommendationsarisingromthereviewandocus

    onaddressingthekeybusinessissuestoimprovetheeciencyandeectivenessothe

    GovernmentsuseoICT.

    Allowagenciestoobtainopt-outs,basedongenuinebusinessneed,romagreedwhole-o-

    governmentactivities.Opt-outstobeapprovedbytheMinisterialCommittee,inormedby

    theSIGB.

    Capability

    Improveagencycapabilitytocommission,manageandrealisethebenetsromICT-enabled

    projectsthroughtheimplementationoacommonmethodologyorassessingagencycapabilitybasedonsel-assessmentandperiodicindependentaudit.EachagencyChie

    ExecutivetoproposeatargetlevelocapabilitybasedontheiragencysandtheGovernments

    strategicpriorities,andorthistobeindependentlyvalidated.Agenciestodevelopacapability

    improvementplanwithcommitment,andagreedactions,toaddressidentiedgaps.

    ICT spend

    TargettomovetotalFMAActagencyICTspendromanaverage77:23%splitbetweenICT

    BAUactivitiesandcreationonewcapabilityin200708toanaverage70:30%in201112.

    Asinitialstepstowardsthisgoal,reducetheICTBAUbudgetsothelargest28FMAAct

    agencies(Deenceexcluded)withICTspendsinexcesso$20millionperannumby15%rom

    200708actuals(oralistoagenciesreertoAppendixF),withaphasedintroductionover

    twoyears.

    CreateICTReviewTeamstohelptheseagenciesachieveorexceedthetargetreductions

    withoutimpairingservicedeliverytocitizensandbusiness.

    Inaddition,IrecommendtargetingagencieswithtotalannualICTspendsbetween$2million

    and$20milliontoachievea7.5%reductiononaverageotheirBAUrom200708actuals

    (oralistoagenciesreertoAppendixG),withaphasedintroductionovertwoyears.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    16/121

    ExecutiveSummary

    The15%and7.5%reductionsintotalshouldsavetheGovernmentaround$140millioninthe

    rstyearandinexcesso$400millioninthesecondandsubsequentyears.Ialsorecommend

    that50%othesavingsgeneratedbytheserecommendationsbetranserredtoacentralund

    orreinvestmentinprojectstoimproveeciencyandeectivenessoICTBAUactivities,such

    asreplacementolegacysotwareandhardwarewithhighsupportandmaintenancecosts.

    Skills

    Createawhole-o-governmentAustralianPublicService(APS)ICTcareerstructure,including

    traininganddevelopmentprogramsorICTproessionalsinkeyskillsareas.

    Developandmaintainawhole-o-governmentstrategicICTworkorceplan.

    ReducethetotalnumberoICTcontractorsinuseacrossFMAActagenciesby50%overa

    2-yearperiodandincreasethenumberoAPSICTsta.ThisshouldsavetheGovernmentan

    estimated$100million(acrossbothBAUandproject-relatedwork).

    Data centres

    Developawhole-o-governmentapproachoruturedatacentrerequirementsoverthenext

    1015years.

    Sustainable ICT

    Developawhole-o-governmentICTsustainabilityplan(inconjunctionwiththeDepartmentotheEnvironment,Water,HeritageandtheArts)tomanagetheenergycostsandcarbon

    ootprintotheGovernmentsICTactivities.

    IMPLEMENTATION

    Myrecommendationsentailamajorprogramoadministrativereormandculturalchange.

    BasedonmyexperienceocreatingsustainablechangeintheUKpublicsectortherearetwo

    criticalrequirementswhichwilldeterminethesuccessotheproposedprogram:rst,sustained

    leadershipanddriveatMinisterialandtopociallevels;second,ensuringtheenablersochangeareproperlyresourcednotonlyinundingterms,butalsoskillsotherightcalibre.

    TheearlydecisionsotheMinisterialCommitteeandtheSIGBwillneedtosendoutclear

    signalsaboutthepaceanddirectionochangewhichisthenreinorcedthroughsubsequent

    decisions.Itwillbeessentialtoensurethatagreedwhole-o-governmentICTapproachesand

    arrangementsaretorpurpose.

    Theollowingpagesetsoutaproposedimplementationplanorthekeyrecommendations

    basedontheassumptionthattheGovernmentapprovesallmyrecommendationsin

    November2008.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    17/121

    ExecutiveSummary

    Key recommendations

    Sep-0

    8

    Dec-0

    8

    Mar-0

    9

    Jun-0

    9

    Sep-0

    9

    Dec-0

    9

    Mar-1

    0

    Jun-1

    0

    Sep-1

    0

    Dec-1

    0

    Mar-1

    1

    Jun-1

    1

    Strengthen pan-government governance

    Ministerial Committee on ICT

    Secretaries ICT Governance Board

    Whole-of-government opt-out criteria

    Strengthen agency governance Improve agency capability assessment

    a. Capability methodology and conduct pilots

    b. Capability methodology implementation across largeagencies

    c. Large agencies propose target capability and develop

    capability improvement plan

    Tighten the management of ICT business as usual funding

    BAU ICT budgets

    a. ICT Review Teams methodology and efficiency metrics

    b. ICT Review Teams in agencies phase 1

    c. ICT Review Teams in agencies phase 2

    Enhance the management of the APS ICT skills base

    ICT skills

    a. Whole-of-government ICT career structure

    b. Whole-of-government ICT workforce plan Reduce total APS contractors and increase the number of

    APS ICT staffExamine current security vetting processes and identify best

    practice

    Data centres

    Whole-of-government data centre strategy

    Sustainability of ICT Whole-of-government ICT sustainability plan

    Enabling Ongoing

    Implementation activities fall into two broad categories: those enabling activities which are one off and need to be undertaken

    at the beginning of or early in the implementation phase (for example the development of efciency metrics), and those

    activities that are ongoing (for example the implementation and ongoing use of efciency metrics).

    In most cases an ongoing activity is preceded by an enabling activity.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    18/121

    ExecutiveSummary

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Iamextremelygrateultothosewhohavehelpedtomakethisreviewpossible.Inparticular,I

    wouldliketothank:

    thePrimeMinisterandtheMinisterorFinanceandDeregulationortheirinputandsupport

    Ministerswhogenerouslygavemetheirtimeandviewsandprovidedmewithagreater

    understandingotheiraimsandobjectivesandthewiderAustraliancontext

    theAustralianGovernmentInormationManagementOceortheprovisionotalented

    statotheReviewSecretariat

    Centrelink,theAustralianTaxationOceandtheDepartmentoEducation,Employment

    andWorkplaceRelationsortheprovisionohigh-qualityagencysecondeestothereview

    secretariat

    theDepartmentalSecretaries,AgencyChieExecutiveOcers,theAuditor-General,the

    AustralianPublicServiceCommissioner,ChieInormationOcersandChieFinancial

    Ocersotheagenciesthatprovidedsubmissions,surveyresponsesandtheirtimetomeet

    withme

    individualsandorganisationsoutsidetheGovernmentwhocontributedsubmissionstothe

    review,andwhometwithmetodiscusstheirsubmissions

    thoseindividualsandorganisationsundertakingdiscretetasksinsupportothereview

    theActingAustralianHighCommissionertotheUK,andAustradeinLondonortheirhelpandsupport

    mywie,whoputupwithmanyveryearlymorningandlatenightphonecallsIheldwiththe

    reviewteaminAustralia,andmyextendedabsenceduringAugust.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    19/121

    Introduction

    INTRODUCTION

    Inormationandcommunicationtechnology(ICT)intheAustralianGovernment

    (theGovernment)operateswithinabroadercontextandhencemusttakeintoaccountkeymacronationalandglobaltrends.Thesetrendsinclude:

    growingexpectationsamongcitizensandbusinessorthequalityoservicesdelivered

    bygovernments

    increasingconcernsaboutclimatechange

    publicsectorundingpressures

    technologytrends

    globalisation

    ICTworkorcechallenges.

    Thesetrendswillcontinuetohaveanincreasinginfuenceontheapplication,delivery,costand

    demandorICTservices.Theyshouldthereorebeconsideredinordertodevelopanenduring

    whole-o-governmentstrategy.

    Growing expectations among citizens and business or the quality o services deliveredby governments

    Citizensnowexpectgovernmentservicestobeasgoodasthoseprovidedbytheprivate

    sector.AsDeloitte3commented,One-size-ts-allsolutionsrequiringcitizenstonavigatea

    complexbureaucraticmazetoobtainservicessimplydonotcutitintodayson-demand

    world.Restoringthecondenceocitizensintheirpublicinstitutionsmeansdemonstrating

    competenceincarryingoutthediculttaskogovernanceinthe21stcenturyanddelivering

    citizensbettervalueortheirhard-earnedtaxdollars.Therealityisthatcitizensview

    governmentasawholetheydonotwanttorepeatthesameinormationwhenaccessing

    servicesromdierentagencies.Essentially,thiscallsorimprovedcollaboration,integration

    andsharingoinormationbetweengovernmentagencies,keepinginmindprivacyandsecurity

    considerations.

    ArelativelyrecentsurveyoAustraliansuseoandsatisactionwithe-governmentservices4

    showedthattheinternethasbecomeanindispensablechannelordeliveringgovernment

    servicestoAustralians;itsuseiscontinuingtogrowanditisnowthepreerredservicedelivery

    channeloramajorityopeople.Thesurveyreportalsohighlightedthecontinuingchallenges

    3 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (2007), One size fts ew: Using customer insight to transorm government,

    http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/cda/doc/content/dtt_ps_onesizeftsew_040908(1).pd

    4 Australian Government, Department o Finance and Deregulation (December 2007), Australians use o

    and satisaction with e-government services 2007, http://www.fnance.gov.au/Publications/use-o-e-government-services-2007/docs/31576_AGIMO_Satisaction-ALL.pd

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    20/121

    Introduction

    acingtheGovernmentindeliveringservicestotheAustralianpublic.Citizensaresayingthat

    theyvalueconvenienceintheirinteractionswithagencies,althoughorsome,theadvantages

    obeingabletodealdirectlywithrealpeopleace-to-aceorbytelephonearepreerable.

    Citizensarealsosayingtheywante-governmentservicesandgovernmentwebsitestobeeasier

    tondandtouse.

    Butwhilecitizensaredemandingmorejoined-upgovernmentservices,theyalsowanttheir

    inormationtoremainsecureandtheirprivacyprotectedromcybercrimeandidentityraud.

    ThechallengeortheGovernmentistomaintainthisdelicatebalanceomakingtheprovision

    ointegratedservicesbothsecureandconvenientsoastobuildandmaintaintrust.

    Increasing concerns about climate change

    Societiesandgovernmentsarebecomingincreasinglyconcernedabouttheenvironment.

    Governmentsareacingpressuretodealwiththeeectsoglobalwarming,aoreseeable

    declineinossiluelsandgassupplies,andsteeplyrisingenergycosts.Asaresult,thegreening

    ogovernmentpoliciesistakingplacearoundtheworld.

    ThecurrentGovernmentiscommittedtotakingactiontoreducetheimpactoclimate

    change,byreducinggreenhousegasemissionsandbyrespondingtothepotentialimpacts

    ounavoidableclimatechange.TheGovernmentisconsideringintroducingacapandtrade

    emissionstradingschemeby2010,andamandatoryrenewableenergytargetby2020.5

    ThesechangeswillneedtobetakenintoaccountwhenanoverarchingICTstrategyisdeveloped

    ortheGovernment.InApril2007GartnerestimatedthattheglobalICTindustryaccounted

    or2%oCO2emissions,onaparwiththeaviationindustry.6Gartneralsoestimatedthatlarge

    organisationsspendbetween4%and10%otheirtotalICTbudgetsonenergyandthatthis

    numbermayquadrupleby2012duetothetwinactorsopower-hungryhardwareandrising

    energycosts.7InAustralia,theAustralianComputerSocietyundertookanemissionsauditonthe

    amountocarbondioxidebeinggeneratedbyAustralianbusinessesuseoICT.Theresultsothe

    auditindicatedthatICTusebyAustralianbusinessesgenerated7.94milliontonnesocarbon

    dioxidein2005,equivalentto1.52%ototalnationalcarbondioxideemissions.8

    TheGovernmentwillbeunderincreasingpressuretoarticulateaviablestrategytomakeICT

    environmentallysustainable.

    5 See Australian Government (July 2008), Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Green Paper summary,

    http://www.climatechange.gov.au/greenpaper/summary/pubs/greenpaper-summary.pd

    6 Gartner Press Release (April 26, 2007), Gartner estimates ICT industry accounts or 2 percent o global CO2

    emissions, http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=503867

    7 Gartner Press Release (November 7, 2006), Gartner says look beyond power issue as pressure mounts or

    greener IT, http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=498224

    8 Australian Computer Society (August 2007), Policy statement on green ICT,http://www.acs.org.au/acs_policies/docs/2007/greenictpolicy.pd

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    21/121

    Introduction

    Public sector unding pressures

    Eectsoanageingpopulation,globalcompetitionamongvariouseconomies,andclimate

    changearecreating,andwillcontinuetoplace,pressureonpublicsectorbudgetstoincreasespendinginareassuchashealth,educationandtransport.TheGovernmentmustndwayso

    improvingtheeciencyandeectivenessoitsservicedelivery.Thismeansprovidingvalueor

    moneybyimprovingqualityoservice(accessibilityorallandacceptablecitizenexperiences

    andoutcomes),andreducingthecostsinvolvedinserviceprovision.

    Technology trends

    Businesses,individualsandpublicinstitutionsareadoptingawidevarietyotechnologiesand

    tosuchanextentthattheyarechangingthewayeachentityunctionsandrelatestoothers.

    Governmentsingeneral,althoughmoreconservativeusersosomenewertechnologies,

    stillneedtobeawareobroadertechnologytrendsandthepotentialimpactotheseon

    governmentpolicies,operationsandservicedelivery.

    Forexample,theinternethasmovedtoWeb2.0,amoreinteractivemodelinwhichuser-

    generatedcontentisrontandcentre,andhasthepotentialtochangerelationshipswith

    citizens,intermediariesandexternalserviceproviders,aswellasamonggovernmentagencies.

    Governmentswillneedtoexploreandshittothisnewparadigm.

    Manyprivatesectororganisationshavealreadyembracedserviceorientedarchitecture(SOA),

    whereICTassetsarealignedtobusinessservicesinastandard,fexibleandarchitectedashion,

    andalsothebenetsthatcomewithitsuchasincreasedagility,re-useandreducedcosts.

    GovernmentorganisationsareslowlymovingtowardsleveragingSOAinthedevelopmentotheir

    applications,butthereispotentialorthepacetobequickenedandorurtherthinkingtodoneat

    thewhole-o-governmentlevelratherthanagencyleveltomaximisethepotentialbenets.

    Advancesinprocessingpower,storageandmemorytechnologieshavepavedthewayormore

    sophisticateduseodataanalyticsandbusinessintelligencetechnologies.Governmentsare

    alsousinggeospatialtechnologiesandresourcestooptimiseservicedeliveryandtoimprove

    decisionmakinginareassuchascollectionandanalysisointelligenceinormation,protectionocriticalinrastructureandresponsetoemergencies.However,theexplosivegrowtho

    data,compliancerequirementsandincreasinglycomplexbusinessenvironmentshavemade

    inormationstoragemanagementmorecriticalthanever.Governmentsneedtoensurethat

    theyareabletomaintaincontrolovertheirabilitytostoreandmanagethiskeybusinessasset,

    havingdueregardtoprivacyconcerns.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    22/121

    Introduction0

    Globalisation

    Countriesandsocietiesarebecomingmoreeconomicallyinterdependentacrosssocial,political

    andculturalboundaries.Thereisgreaterglobalmovementogoodsandservices,labourandpeople,capitalandtechnologyamongpreviouslyindependentandsovereignentities.

    ThesetrendsneedtobeconsideredromanICTperspective.Forexample,globalisationisenabling

    largeemergingeconomieswithhighorincreasingeducationalstandards(suchasBrazil,Russia,

    IndiaandChina)todrawactivityawayromthedevelopedeconomiesotendeliveringequivalent

    servicesataractionotheprice.TheremaybewaysorICTtoharnesssomeothesetrendsto

    addressotherchallengessuchastheICTskillsshortage.ThepotentialoroutsourcingICT-related

    activitiestolowercostcountrieswithhighlyskilledworkorcesisalreadybeingutilisedbymany

    privatesectororganisationstoimprovetheircompetitiveness.Forgovernments,morecomplex

    trade-oshavetobemadewhenconsideringwhetherICT-relatedactivitiesshouldbeundertakenoshore.However,evenipoliticalconsiderationslimittheactivitiestoonshorelocations,theremay

    bescopeordeployinggovernmentICTworktoreinorceregionaleconomicdevelopmentpolicies.

    ICT workorce challenges

    AustraliasunemploymentrateatJuly2008was4.3%,andsomepartsoAustraliaare

    experiencingevenlowerrates(orexample,theAustralianCapitalTerritoryhadan

    unemploymentrateo2.7%inJuly2008).9Coupledwithanageingpopulation,thisrepresents

    asignicantpolicyandresourcingchallengeortheGovernmentasamanageroeconomicgrowthandasalargeuseroskilledlabour.

    AccordingtoareportpreparedortheAustralianComputerSocietyandtheAustralian

    InormationIndustryAssociation10,theAustralianICTindustryislookingatashortallo14,000

    jobsby2010,growingto25,000withinanother10years.ThereportalsowarnedthattheICT

    skillsshortagewillcontinueatcurrentorworselevelsuntilatleast2012,andarguedthat

    temporarymigrantvisasareonlyashort-termsolution.ThereportsaidthatAustraliamustact

    quicklytoincreaselocalgraduatenumbersbyatleast12.5%ayearandreducethelossoICT

    proessionalstooverseasemployers.

    SuchICTskillsshortageswillalsodrivetheneedorbettersharingoICTassetsacrossthe

    wholeotheGovernment.InadditiontogrowingitsownICTproessionalsthroughtraining

    anddevelopment,otheroptionsmayincludeemployingolderAustralians,attractingmore

    emalestoacareerinICT,andpartneringwithacademicinstitutions.TheGovernmentwill

    alsoneedtoconsiderstrategiestoensureithassucientskilledICTproessionalstomeetthe

    demandsoserviceprovision.

    9 http://www.abs.gov.au

    10 Centre or Innovative Industry Research Inc. (August 2008), The ICT skills orecast project. First report:

    Quantiying current and orecast ICT employment (Executive summary and contents),http://www.acs.org.au/attachments/ICTSkillsForecastingReportExecSummaryAug08.pd

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    23/121

    Introduction

    The changed Australian political context

    ThecurrentapproachtothegovernanceandmanagementoICTacrossFMAActagencies,

    wheretheyhaveveryhighlevelsoautonomy(includingtheabilitytosel-approveopt-instowhole-o-governmentapproachesintheICTdomain),mayhavebeenanappropriatemodelin

    thecontextothepreviousgovernmentsobjectivesandpolicies,andthetrendsothe1990s

    andearlypartsothisdecade.However,therearenowadierentsetoexternaltrendsand

    mydiscussionswiththePrimeMinisterandsomeotherMembersoCabinethaveindicatedto

    methatthereisnowaverydierentpoliticalandpublicadministrationagendainwhichitis

    appropriatetoconsiderwhetherthestatusquoisstilltorpurpose.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    24/121

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    25/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    chaPteR :

    views fRom within theaustRalian goveRnmentThischaptersummarisesthekeythemesraisedinsubmissionsromAustralianGovernment

    agenciesandin24bilateralmeetingswithagencies.Atotalo41Financial Management and

    Accountability Act 1997(FMAAct)agencieswereinvitedtomakesubmissionstothereview.

    Theywereaskedaseriesoquestionsabout:

    thealignmentotheirICTstrategytotheiroverallstrategicpriorities

    howtheymeasuredtheperormanceotheirICTinvestments

    howtheymeasuredtheirorganisationscapabilitytocommission,manageanddeliver

    ICT-enabledprograms

    howtheymeasuredtheeciencyandeectivenessotheirICTspend

    theirriskmanagementstrategies

    detailsobestpracticesthatcouldbeshared

    theirviewsonexistingwhole-o-governmentICTarrangements.

    Atotalo40agencysubmissionswerereceivedandreviewed.FouragenciestheDepartment

    othePrimeMinisterandCabinet(PM&C),theAustralianNationalAuditOce(ANAO),the

    DepartmentoFinanceandDeregulation(Finance)andtheDepartmentotheTreasury(Treasury)

    wereaskedspecicquestionsrelatedtotheirrespectiveoversight/governanceroles.Accordingly,

    percentagesraisedinthischapterdonotincludeconsiderationoPM&CandtheANAO,butdo

    includeFinanceandTreasury,astheyalsoprovidedresponsesontheirICToperations.AppendixD

    containsaulllistotheagenciesthatmadeasubmissiontothereview.

    1.1. ICT INVESTMENT DECISION MAKING

    1.1.1. Prioritising investments

    Thirty-veagenciesdetailedormalprocessesorprioritisingICTinvestmentatthe

    organisationallevel,withonlythreeagenciesnotprovidinganydetails.Prioritiesareset

    throughgovernancearrangements(35agencies),combinedinsomeinstanceswithbusiness

    caseprocesses(10agencies)orbudgetmanagementprocesses(sixagencies).

    Nineteenothese35agencieswereabletodetailreasonablycomprehensiveprioritisation

    techniquesorextensiveassessmentcriteriatorankcompetinginvestments,withsixagencies

    activelygroupinginvestmentsintoprioritygroups.However,theother16agencieswereonlyabletodetailbasicprioritisationprocessesandcriteria.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    26/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    Agenciescitedtheollowingcriteriausedwhenrankingcompetinginvestmentpriorities:

    alignmentwithgovernment,strategicandbusinesspriorities(30agencies)

    strategicimpact,value,benetsandsavings(26agencies)

    risks(15agencies)

    resourcesandcapabilitytodeliver(13agencies)

    costsandavailableunding(13agencies)

    alignmentwithexistingarchitecture(nineagencies)

    dependenciesandprerequisites(threeagencies)

    timerame(twoagencies).

    1.1.2. Alignment o ICT investments with strategic priorities

    Thereviewobservedthatthereareveryewrameworksinplaceatthewhole-o-government

    levelorsettingprioritiesorICTinvestmentacrossportolios.Thereisnoormalprocessby

    whichagenciescanobtaininormationonICTactivitiesinotheragenciesbeoreinvestingin

    ICT.Itwasalsonotedthatthetechnicalcapacityothethreecentralagencies(Finance,PM&C

    andTreasury)toassessandadviseonICTinvestmentproposalsisatullstretchduringthe

    budgetcycle.Thisresultsineedbackonindividualproposals,ratherthantakingawhole-o-

    governmentapproachtoinvestment.

    Furthermore,alongstandingeaturenotedbyseveralagencyheadswasthatinvestmentin

    ICTtosupportpolicydeliveryhas,insomeinstances,notbeenconsideredbeoreannouncing

    policies.PolicymakersandMinistersarenotalwaysullyawarethatinadequateconsideration

    odeliveryimplicationsattheoutsetcanhavesignicantadverseimplicationsonthecosto

    policydelivery.Therewassomelimitedevidenceobestpractice,wherethoseresponsibleor

    deliveryweredeeplyinvolvedinthepolicyormulationprocess.

    Attheorganisationallevel,32agencies(82%)notedthattheyensurealignmentoICT

    investmentstostrategicprioritiesthroughormalplanningprocessesandgovernancemechanisms.Agencystrategicprioritiesinclude:

    enhancingthecapabilityosta(14agencies)

    improvingorganisationaleectivenessandeciencytodeliverbetterservices(12agencies)

    increasingcommunitycondence(10agencies)

    improvingcollaborationandengagement,andstrengtheningstakeholderrelationships

    (nineagencies)

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    27/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    supportingeconomicdevelopment(sevenagencies)

    providingsoundandtimelyadvice(veagencies)

    deliveringgovernmentpolicy(ouragencies).

    AgenciesreportedthatalignmentisacilitatedthroughtheinfuenceoseniorICTexecutives

    inagency-widegovernancearrangements.However,inonlyaewcasesdidagenciesindicate

    thattheChieInormationOcer(CIO)isamemberotheexecutiveteam.Onlytwoagencies

    reportedthattheirICTgovernancestructuresareunderpinnedbyAS8015-2005Corporate

    GovernanceoICT.Anadditionaltwoagencieseitherreerencedthestandardintheir

    submissions,orstatedthattheyplantouseitintheuture.

    1.1.3. Future importance o ICT to government business

    Acrosstheboard,agenciesreportedthatICTisaundamentalbusinessenablerandanintegral

    partotheiroperations.TherewasalsoaunanimousviewthatICTwillcontinuetoincrease

    inimportance.Inparticular,agenciescommentedontheincreasingneedormorerobustand

    agilesystemsto:

    meetrisingexpectationsromcitizensandgovernment

    delivermoreecientandeectiveservicesandoperations

    harnessinormationandintelligence

    manageincreasedcomplexityintheregulatory,businessandpolicyenvironments.

    Nineteenagenciessaidthattheyexpectthedemandoronlinetransactionalinteractionsto

    continuetoincrease,withthesaeguardingocitizensinormationanimportantconsideration.

    Improvingthelevelocollaborationandinormationsharingbetweenagenciesandother

    externalorganisations(orexample,thetradeandinvestmentcommunity,agencieswithstrong

    internationallinkssuchaspolicingandpatents)isanimperative(andachallenge)or15agencies.

    1.2. PROJECT DELIVERY

    Thereareseveralwhole-o-governmentinitiativesthatexamineandreportonthedeliveryo

    majorgovernmentinvestmentprojectsandprograms,includingICT-enabledprojects.These

    aretheGatewayReviews,ANAOauditactivities,andthePM&CCabinetImplementationUnits

    TracLightReports.

    GatewayReviewsassistFMAActagenciestoimprovethelikelihoodosuccessuldeliveryo

    projectson-time,on-budgetandwiththeintendedbenetsrealised.However,Iheardoneview

    thatGatewayReviewrecommendationshave,insomecases,notbeenadopted.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    28/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    TheANAOsubmissionhighlightedthatitsauditsoICT-enabledprojectsidentiedareasor

    urtherimprovingthemanagementanduseoICT.Theseincludeensuringbusinesscases

    includemeasuresobothprojectsuccessandstandardisedcostingmethods.

    MostagencyresponsesonhowtheymeasurewhethertheirICTinvestmentsweremeeting

    theirplannedoutcomesocusedonlyonnewICT-enabledprojects,ratherthanoninvestmentin

    existingbusinessasusualactivities.Responsesrevealedthatmostagencieshaveormalprocesses

    inplaceornewprojects,suchasaprojectmanagementrameworksorgovernancemechanisms.

    1.2.1. Use o project management rameworks

    MostagenciesusesomeormoprojectmanagementmethodologytomanagetheirICT

    projects.Twenty-twoagencies(59%)usethePRINCE2methodologyasthebasisotheirprojectmanagementmethodology,withaurthertwoagenciesplanningtointroduce

    PRINCE2inthenearuture.Additionally,veagenciesusetheProjectManagementBodyo

    Knowledge(PMBOK)tounderpintheirprojectmanagementmethodologies(ouragenciesare

    usingPMBOKintandemwithPRINCE2),whileanothertwoagenciesplantoadoptPMBOK.

    1.2.2. Use o governance mechanisms

    FiveagenciescitedtheirinvolvementinGatewayReviewsasagovernancemechanismor

    projectdelivery.Oneagencycitedtheuseoacross-agencyprojectboard,while15agencies

    discussedtheiruseointernalprojectboards.Tenagenciesnotedthattheirprojectsreceived

    seniormanagementendorsement.

    1.2.3. Risk management

    Twenty-twoagenciesindicatedthattheirriskmanagementrameworkswerecompliant,

    consistentwith,orbasedonAS/NZS4360:2004RiskManagement.

    Nineagenciesnotedthattheirauditcommitteeswereresponsibleoroverseeingrisk

    managementwithintheagency.Fouragencieshavecentralisedoversightoriskmanagementwithintheorganisationthroughenterpriseriskregisterstomanageagency-widerisks.

    Agencieshavetakendierentapproachestoembeddingriskmanagementwithintheir

    operations,includingincorporatingriskmanagementwithintheirChieExecutiveInstructions,

    integratingriskmanagementwithintheirbusinessplanningandprojectmanagement,

    applyingprojectmanagementmethodologiessuchasPRINCE2,anddesignatinganagency

    riskmanager.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    29/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    1.2.4. Benefts realisation plans

    Twentyagenciesreportedsomeormoevaluationobenetsattheendotheproject

    comparedtothoseidentiedintheprojectinitiationdocuments.Eightagenciesreportedthattheyarepreparingtointroduceormalbenetsrealisationevaluationprocesses,while

    veagenciesnotedthattheytrackbenets,butdidnotoerevidenceoaormaldedicated

    process.Twoagenciesdidnotdiscussbenetsrealisation.

    1.2.5. Evidence rom recent ICT projects

    Agencieswereaskedtoprovidedetailsotheir510majorICT-enabledprojectsandhowthey

    measuredtheirsuccessintermsocost,time,specicationanddeliveryoanticipatedbenets.

    Agenciesprovideddetailso193completedprojects.Table1.1detailsobservationsmade

    regardingtheperormanceotheseprojects.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    30/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    Table 1.1 Performance of 193 completed projects

    COST TIME BENEFITS ACHIEVEMENT

    23% (45) were delivered over

    budget

    39% (74) were delivered under

    budget

    13% (25) had no variance between

    estimated cost and actual cost

    25% (49) were silent on the

    question

    33% (64) were delivered over time

    2% (3) were delivered before time

    41% (80) had no variance between

    estimated time and actual time to

    delivery

    24% (46) were silent on the

    question

    44% (86) reported achievement of

    benefits but did not provide

    evidence of measurement

    Only 5% (10) reported actual

    measurement of benefits and

    compared anticipated benefits with

    actual benefits realised

    45% (86) reported outcomes that

    were not measurable

    6% (11) were silent on the question

    Thirtyfourofthe193projectsrecordedexpenditureofmorethan$5million.Table1.2detailsobservationsmaderegardingtheperformanceoftheselargerprojects.

    Table 1.2 Performance of projects over $5 million

    COST TIME BENEFITS ACHIEVEMENT

    12% (4) were delivered over budget

    29% (10) were delivered under

    budget

    9% (3) had no variance between

    estimated cost and actual cost

    50% (17) were silent on the

    question

    12% (4) were delivered over time

    No projects were delivered under

    time

    38% (13) had no variance between

    estimated time and actual time to

    delivery

    50% (17) were silent on the

    question

    36% (12) reported achievement of

    benefits but did not provide

    evidence of measurement

    11% (4) reported actual

    measurement of benefits and

    compared anticipated benefits with

    actual benefits realised

    38% (13) reported achieving actual

    outcomes that were not measurable

    15% (5) were silent on the question

    1.3. ORGANISATIONAL CAPABILITY

    Thereviewaskedagenciestoprovidedetailsohowthecapabilityotheirorganisationto

    commission,manageanddeliversuccessulICT-enabledprogramsismeasured.Italsoasked

    agenciestoprovideanassessmentotheircurrentcapability,andanyplanstoimproveit.

    Table 1.1 Perormance o 193 completed projects

    Table 1.2 Perormance o projects over $5 million

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    31/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    1.3.1. Current assessment o capability

    Inrespondingtothisquestion,onlythreeagenciesprovidedanassessmentotheir

    organisationsoverallcapability,withtheremainingagenciesinterpretingthequestionsolelyasICTcapability,aterbeinggivenanopportunitytoreconsidertheirresponse.Sixagencies

    providedahighassessmentotheirICTcapabilities,while15agenciesstatedthattheirICT

    capabilitiesweremediumandeightsaidtheywerelow.Theremainingagenciesoeredno

    assessmentocapability.Intheabsenceoacommoncapabilityramework,agenciesuseda

    rangeopartialmeasurestomaketheseassessments.

    1.3.2. Measurements o capability

    SeventeenagenciesmeasuredtheircapabilitybywhetherICThadbeenabletodeliveragainst

    thebusinessrequirementsinatimelymanner.Twenty-veagenciescitedtheirstrongproject

    managementcapabilitiesasevidenceotheirstrongcapabilities,whilevepointedtostaand

    usersatisactionsurveysasanindicatorotheircapability.

    Thereissomeusebyagenciesoormalassessmentrameworkstoassesscapability.Seven

    agencieshaveusedtheSotwareEngineeringInstitutesCapabilityMaturityModelIntegration

    (CMMI)toassesscapabilityandaurtheragencyplanstouseCMMI,butthesehavemainly

    beeninormalinternalassessments.

    Atotalo11agenciesreportedusingtheITGovernanceInstitutesControlObjectivesor

    InormationandRelatedTechnology(COBIT)maturitymodels,whichprovideamanagement

    toolenablingbenchmarkingandtargetingomaturitylevels.

    EighteenagenciesreportedusingInormationTechnologyInrastructureLibrary(ITIL),whilea

    urtherouragenciesreportedthattheyareplanningtoadoptit.Onlyoneagencynotedthatit

    hadundertakenanITILProcessMaturityAssessment,conductedbyanexternalprovider.

    Oneagencyobservedthatthereisnoevidencethatcurrentinvestmentapprovalprocesses

    includeanyrigorousandobjectivemethodologyorassessingtheorganisationalcapabilityo

    anagencyseekingundingorICT-enabledprojectsduringthebudgetprocess.Equally,thereisnoassessmentothelikelihoododeliveringprojectoutcomes.

    1.4. PEOPLE

    TwelveagenciescommentedontheadverseimpactoICTskillsshortages,bothinsubmissions

    andduringbilateralmeetings.ThereisgeneralagreementamongtheseagenciesthatICTskills

    shortagesarewidespread,andthatanagencysabilitytoattractandretainhighlyskilledand

    motivatedpeoplehasasignicantimpactonbotheciencyandeectiveness,althoughve

    agenciesobservedthattheyarenotexperiencingcurrentpressureromshortages.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    32/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment0

    Thoseagenciesthatreportedanadverseimpactotheskillsshortagesdiscusseditintermso

    itseectonagencycapability.SomeagenciesnotedthatbothBAUandproject-relatedactivity

    wereatrisk.Oneagencyalsonotedthatitssupplierswereconstrainedintheirabilitytoservice

    contracts,asaresultotheskillsshortage.Theimpactocompetitionbetweenagenciesorscarceskillsoncontractorcostswasalsocommentedupon.

    Agenciesareturningtoamixosolutionstocopewithskillsshortages.Theseinclude:

    Adoptionoworkorceplanning,togetherwithfexibleemploymentstrategiestodealwith

    anageingICTworkorce.FouragenciesreportedimplementationoanICT-specicworkorce

    plan,whiletwomorearedevelopingsuchplans.

    Relianceoncontractors,withheavypremiummarketratespaidbysomeagencies.Many

    agenciescommentedthattheybelievedtheirpanelarrangementswereverysuccessul.

    Partneringwithprivatesectororganisationstodeliverprojects.

    LocationoICTstaoutsideoCanberra.Duringagencybilateralmeetings,threeagencies

    notedthattheyhadconsciouslymovedICTpositionstootherlocationsthroughoutAustralia

    inresponsetotheICTskillsshortage.11Oneagencynotedthatthisapproachhad,tosome

    extent,bueredthemromtherisksinherentintheskillsshortage.Thisagencynotedthat

    projectworkwaseasiertodispersethanongoingproductionsupport.

    Internationalrecruitment.

    Educationandgraduaterecruitment,includingpartneringwithtertiaryinstitutions,running

    traineeshipprograms,andsupportingapprenticeships.Twoagenciesreportedthattheyhavepartneredwithtertiaryinstitutionsinaneorttoproducegraduatesskilledintheiragencys

    particularrequirements.TheDeenceMaterielOrganisationispartneringwithatertiaryinstitution

    todevelopaMastersinprojectmanagementwhichisopentoallgovernmentemployees.

    1.5. MANAGING ICT SPEND

    AgencieswereaskedhowtheyensuredthattheirICTspend(bothoperatingandcapital)isas

    ecientandeectiveaspossible,andtoprovidedetailsotheperormancemetricsusedto

    measuretheeciencyandeectivenessotheirICTunction.

    1.5.1. Measures o efciency

    VeryewagenciessaidthattheyusedmetricstoassesstheeciencyotheirICTspend.Only

    twoagenciesregularlyreportedeciencymetricsandtargetstotheirseniorexecutive.A

    urthertwoagenciessaidthattheyusedeciencymetricsannually,whilesevenreportedthat

    theyundertakeeciencybenchmarkingonanadhocbasisusingcontractedserviceproviders.

    11 It is recognised that many more agencies have ICT capability in other locations outside o Canberra due to

    their headquarters being located in non-Canberra locations, and other business reasons. However, as reportedin 3.2.3, 79% o ICT sta are located in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT).

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    33/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    Fouragenciesaredevelopingeciencymeasurementmetricsorareimplementingactivity-

    basedcostingtounderstandtheirICTcosts.Therewassomeevidenceomultipleinstanceso

    taxpayersmoneybeingspenttoobtainbenchmarkdatainareassuchasdesktops.

    1.5.2. Measures o eectiveness

    Twenty-sixagenciesreportedthattheyemploymetricstomanagetheeectivenessotheirICT

    operation,suchasavailability,outagereporting,numberoclientapplicationservicerequests

    completed,andcustomersatisactionsurveys.Aurthertwomanagetheeectivenessotheir

    ICTserviceprovidersthroughtheuseooperationalmetrics.

    1.5.3. Other mechanisms to measure efciency and eectiveness

    Otheremainingagencies,ninereportedusingqualitativeratherthanquantitativeeciency

    andeectivenessmeasures,including:

    projectmanagementrameworkssuchasPRINCE2

    governancecommitteesthatmonitorICT-relatedprojectsandoperations

    activebudgetmanagementcomparingactualcosttobudgets

    procurementapproachessuchasmarkettestingandpanelcontracts

    servicedeliveryreportingooutsourcedarrangements.

    Thesemeasureswerealsousedbyagenciesthatdidreportusingquantitativemetrics.Two

    agenciesdidnotreportusinganymethodstomanagetheirICTspend.

    1.5.4. Future plans to increase efciency and eectiveness o ICT spend

    Inadditiontothoseagenciesalreadyusingtechniquessuchastheollowing,otheragencies

    reportedutureplanstoincreasetheeciencyandeectivenessoICTspendby:

    increasinguseoconsolidation,virtualisationandcentralisationoinrastructure(sevenagencies)

    markettestingoutsourcedarrangements,inrastructureandsystems(sixagencies)

    improvingundingandgovernancesystems(veagencies)

    rereshinganddeployingupdatedtechnology(veagencies)

    adoptingastrongerarchitecturalapproachtoICT(ouragencies)

    implementingrecognisedrameworks,suchasservicemanagementandotherITILbased

    approaches(ouragencies)

    drivinggreatercost-ecienciesinprocurementthroughpartneringwithotherstoobtain

    volumediscounts(ouragencies)

    implementingEarnedValuemanagement(twoagencies).

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    34/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    1.6. PROCUREMENT AND ICT OUTSOURCING

    Althoughnotexplicitlymentionedintheinvitationtoagenciestomakeasubmissiontothe

    review,manyagencieshadpointsoviewonprocurementandICToutsourcingandtheirrelevancetoeectivenessandeciency.

    1.6.1. $80,000 tender threshold

    FiveagenciesdiscussedthedicultiesarisingromtheCommonwealthProcurement

    GuidelinesrequirementoranopentenderoranyICTacquisitionestimatedtocostmorethan

    $80,000.ThisissuewasalsoraisedatameetingotheChieInormationOcerForumwhichI

    attended.

    1.6.2. Common-use contracts and supplier panel arrangements

    Nineagenciessawmeritingreateruseocommon-usecontractsandsupplierpanel

    arrangementsdevelopedbyacentralbodyinareasogenericneedoruse.Therewas

    recognitionthatvolumesourcingarrangementscurrentlyunderdevelopmentcouldservicethis

    need.Aewagenciessupportedcommonapproachestobenchmarking.

    Twoagenciesstatedthatsuchawhollycentralisedprocurementunctionislikelytoadda

    signicantbureaucraticoverheadthatwouldnotbejustiedbyeciencies.Fouragencies

    saidthatanymovetocentre-ledprocurementmustensurethatagenciesarenothinderedinachievingtheirspecicbusinessoutcomes.

    1.6.3. ICT outsourcing

    Agenciesuseamixoinsourcedandoutsourcedarrangements.Someagenciesaremoving

    torenewtheiroutsourceddeliveryarrangements,whileothershaveneveroutsourcedand

    alwaysretainedaninsourcedICTcapability.Otheragenciesaremovingbackromoutsourcedto

    insourcedarrangements,andothershaveamixoinsourcedandoutsourcedarrangementsbut

    notaspartoaclusterarrangement.Thisclusterarrangement,requiredundertheInormation

    TechnologyInrastructureConsolidationandOutsourcingInitiativecommencingin1997,

    attractedcriticismromthreesmalleragencies.Theyoundthattheirneedsarenotbeing

    cateredorasoutsourcedprovidersdedicatemostattentiontotheneedsolargeragenciesin

    thecluster.

    Atmeetingswithagencyheads,Iheardthattheoutsourcinginitiativewashandledtoo

    directionallybyacentralauthorityandthatthearrangementsadverselyimpactedupon

    agenciesabilitytounctionecientlyandeectively.Therewasmuchcriticismotheinitiative,

    withagenciescomplainingothelong-termimplications.Forexample,oneagencysaidthatit

    wasnowmovingromoutsourcedtoinsourcedservices,withthemaindriverbeingreducedcosts.Anotheragencystatedthatitsexpectationsorservicedeliverywerenotmetbytheir

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    35/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    outsourcedserviceprovider.Concernwasexpressedbyagencyheadsthattheclusteringo

    agencieswasrandomandtherewaslittlebusinessalignmentintheclusters.

    InDecember2000,areportontheReview of the Whole-of-Government InformationTechnology Outsourcing Initiative(theHumphryReport)wasconsideredbytheGovernment.

    TheGovernmentagreedwiththerecommendationwhichsawutureresponsibilityor

    implementingtheoutsourcinginitiativeullydevolvedtoagencyChieExecutivesorBoards.12

    1.7. USE OF BEST PRACTICE

    DuringthecourseothereviewIsoughttodeterminetheextenttowhichAustralian

    Governmentagencieswereengagedinbetterpracticeandbestpractice.Exampleswere

    soughtromagencysubmissions,bilateralconsultationsandthroughwiderinvestigations.Inmyview,thereareanumberobetterandbestpracticeexamplesacrossgovernmentwhich

    couldbemorewidelyadopted.Whilethereisbroadawarenessoaewwell-knownexamples,

    thesetendtobetheexception.Thereisnosystematicmeanstopromulgatebestpractice

    morewidelyand,asaresult,thereisonlylimitedawarenessbyotheragenciesomostothese

    initiatives.Thereisclearlypotentialtoleveragetheseexamplesbypublicisingthemmore

    eectively.Anillustrativeselectionoexamplesisincludedbelow.

    1.7.1. SmartForms

    TheDepartmentoInnovation,Industry,ScienceandResearchhasdevelopedacentreo

    excellenceinSmartForms.SmartFormsareaplatormtodeliveradvancedonlineormsand

    servicesacrossgovernment.TheyenabletheGovernmenttoprovidemoreinormationand

    servicesonlinetothebusinesscommunityandenablecompaniestocompletetheirregulatory

    andreportingrequirementsmoreeciently.Therearecurrentlyover650liveSmartForms

    availableonthesite,resultinginsharedorms,templates,inrastructureandknowledge

    acrossmultiplegovernmentagencies,includingCentrelinkandFinance,andseveralstate

    governments.Thiswhole-o-governmentsolutionhasbeenavailablesinceNovember2005to

    governmentagenciesthatownbusiness-relatedorms.

    1.7.2. Architecture-based design

    Centrelinkssystemoonlineclaimsandservicesorcustomersprovidesaacilitythrough

    whichcustomerscanviewandupdatearangeopersonaldataovertheinternet.Customers

    canaccessinormation,correctinaccurateinormation,lodgeclaimsandmanagetheir

    Centrelinkaairs.Centrelinkisemployinganewserviceorientedarchitecturetomakeunctions

    anddatacontainedinitsmainrame-basedlegacyapplicationsavailabletoapplicationsusing

    12 Humphry, Richard AO (December 2000), Review of the Whole-of-Government Information TechnologyOutsourcing Initiative.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    36/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    webservices.Thisallowsinormationtobecollectedromcitizenswithlittleornointervention

    romCentrelinksta.Onlineservicesarenowbeingdevelopedusingindustrystandard

    technology,providinganincreasingopportunitytodeliverservicesthatcrosstraditionalsystem

    andagencyboundaries.Centrelinkhasoundthatre-useosystemsandunctionalityis

    deliveringcost-eciencies,reducingdevelopmenttime,andprovidingstandardised,consistent

    servicesanduserinteracestocustomers.Onlineservicesunderdevelopmentwillre-use

    existingwebservicestoleveragepreviousinvestmentinICT.

    1.7.3. Project maturity assessments

    TheDeenceMaterielOrganisationhasimplementedatechniquewhichassessesthematurity

    oprojectsastheyprogressromconcepttoin-service.Projectsareassessedagainstthecriteria

    oschedule,cost,realisationorequirement,understandingothetechnicalsolutionandarrangementstooperateandsupportthecapability,technicaldiculty,industryperormance

    issues,andoperationsandsupport.

    1.7.4. Secure communications

    FedLinkisawhole-o-governmentencryptionsystemthatallowsdataclassiedupto

    andincludingPROTECTEDandRESTRICTEDtobetranserredsecurelyamongAustralian

    Governmentagenciesacrosstheinternetoranyinsecureinrastructure.Sinceestablishmentin

    2001,FedLinkhasexpandedtoprovideservicesor98AustralianGovernmentagencies(52%o

    allFMAActandCommonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997agencies).

    TheinitiativeoperatesunderaheadagreementbetweenFinanceandtheFedLinkservice

    provider.Individualagencycontractsarebetweentheagencyandtheserviceprovider.FedLink

    isimplementedasauser-paysundingmodelandiscost-ecientincomparisontosimilar

    commercialoerings.Overthepast7yearsinoperation,FedLinkhasprovedtobearobustand

    eectiveservicewithminimalimpactontheagencyorenduser.

    1.7.5. Sourcing strategies

    Someagenciesarespeciyingoutcomesratherthantechnicalspecicationsasthebasiso

    competitivetendering.TheDepartmentoForeignAairsandTradestatesthisapproachhas

    identiedthatcommercialo-the-shel(COTS)productscanmeettheneedsothebusiness

    withoutbespoking.

    SeveralagenciesnominatedspecicinstancesotheirICTsourcingasbestpractice.These

    includedabestobreedpolicy(AustralianElectoralCommission);ahybridsourcingmodel

    (DepartmentoInrastructure,Transport,RegionalDevelopmentandLocalGovernment);

    multi-partyarrangements(AustralianCustomsService);andleveragingocross-portolio

    arrangements(DepartmentoHumanServices).

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    37/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    1.7.6. Collaboration with industry

    TheAustralianTaxationOce(ATO)hasaSotwareIndustryLiaisonUnitwhichwasestablished

    toassisttax-relatedsotwaredeveloperswithchangesthatcameaboutduringoneoAustraliasmajortaxreorms.TheATOhascontinuedtocollaboratecloselywithsotware

    developerstoimproveandstreamlinetheirinteractionswithATOsystems.Forexample,the

    unitmakesavailablealltax-relatedinormationrequiredbysotwaredeveloperstoreadily

    interacetheirsystemstotheATO.

    1.7.7. ICT management rameworks

    Asnotedinsection1.3.2,18agenciesareusingITILandaurtherourareplanningto

    implementit.Otheseagencies,eightaresucientlycondentinitsusetonominateitasa

    bestpracticerameworkorpromulgationacrossgovernment.ITILpracticesarecommonly

    implementedinareasoproblemmanagement,incidentmanagement,changemanagement

    andcongurationmanagement.

    Likewise,thereare11agenciescurrentlyusingtheITGovernanceInstitutesCOBITasa

    managementtool,enablingbenchmarkingandtargetingomaturitylevels.Fouragencies

    suggestedgovernment-wideuseoCOBIT.

    1.7.8. Earned Value management

    EarnedValueisasetobestpracticeprojectmanagementtechniquesthatintegratecost,

    scheduleandtechnicalperormance.EarnedValueestablishesobjectivemeasuresotheactual

    workachievedcomparedtotheplanorthatwork.Itrequiresbetterup-rontplanningand

    providesanagencyanditscontractorwiththesameperormancedataagainstwhichproject

    progresscanbemanagedandreviewed.

    TheATOhasrealisedgreatertransparencyothestatusoitsChangeProgrambyemploying

    SimpliedEarnedValuemethodologyandxedpricemilestonepaymentsoritscontractor

    serviceswithAccenture.SimpliedEarnedValueprovidesapaymentmethodwherethedollar

    amountclaimedbytheproviderrelatestotheamountoworkperormed.Warranty,stagegateandrisk-rewardpaymentsremainxedprice,withspecicpoint-in-timetriggersandmilestone

    achievementcriteria.Invoicesarereceivedmonthlyorthepreviousmonthsworkeort.

    TheDeenceMaterielOrganisationalsousesamixoEarnedValueandprojectmilestonesto

    manageprojects.Itusesthetechniqueinlarger,morecomplexprojects(usuallyatleast$20

    millionandwithsystemintegrationinvolved).

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    38/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    1.7.9. Knowledge management

    TheAustralianBureauoStatistics(ABS)KnowledgeManagementEnvironmentdelivers

    ongoinginormationproductivitythroughprovisionoanenablingdesktopITenvironment,whichacilitatescollaborationandallowstheinormationproducedtobemanagedas

    acorporateasset.Theplatormintegratesportal,collaboration,mail,workfow,ofine

    capabilities,documentmanagementandrecordkeeping,andsupportstheorganisational

    objectives.Thisincludesthecreation,production,publicationanddistributionoinormation,

    includingtheautomateddeliveryopublicationsandcontenttotheABSwebsite.

    1.7.10. Energy efciency in data centres

    TheTreasuryreportedthatithadinvestedinanewdatacentrewithaconsciouseorttoreduce

    itscarbonootprintbyre-usingthecoldairinCanberraorthecentrescoolingrequirements.

    1.7.11. Search

    TheAgencySearchServiceallowsagenciestoleveragethewhole-o-governmentsearchservice

    providedthroughaustralia.gov.au,toprovideasearchonagencywebsites.Thirty-twoagencies

    haveullyimplementedtheuseothisserviceover57websites.Agenciesusingthesearch

    serviceincludetheBureauoMeteorology,MedicareAustralia,theDepartmentoHealthand

    Ageing,andFinance.

    1.7.12. Successul delivery o technology reresh

    CentrelinksITRereshprogramhasincreasedtherangeoservicesthatCentrelinkscustomers

    arenowabletoaccessonline.AccordingtoanauditbytheANAO13,itsignicantlyadvanced

    onlineservicesorprivatesectororganisations,enablingthemtoveriycustomercircumstances

    andtoexchangeinormation;reducedtheriskoservicecompromiseorailureduetothe

    ageingoitssystems;andestablishedanEnterpriseDataWarehousethatwillprovidethe

    capabilitytosubstantiallyimproveitsmanagementinormation.Overtheveyearsothe

    Rereshprogram,Centrelinkcommittedtoachievingsavingsinadministeredpayments(suchasbenetandpensionpayments)o$184million,andsavingsindepartmentalexpenseso

    $120.9million.Centrelinkachievedthecommittedbudgetarysavings.

    1.7.13. Customer-ocused service delivery

    TheATOe-taxserviceisareetaxreturnpreparationsotwarethatensuresmostreundsare

    issuedin14days.e-taxhelpscitizenspreparetheirincometaxreturnandbabybonusclaim,

    andthenlodgeonline.ItalsoletscitizensdownloadtheirMedicarebenettaxstatement

    details.e-taxwasrstintroducedin1999orthe199899nancialyear.

    13 Audit No. 17, 2007-08, Management o the IT Reresh Program.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    39/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    TheABSe-CensusacilityisatoolthatprovidesallAustralianswitharobust,secureandeasy

    alternativetocompletingthepaperCensusorm,andmakesiteasierortheABStocount

    peoplelivinginisolatedplaces.Importantly,itisalsoaccessibleorpeoplewithadisabilityasit

    usesassistivetechnologies.

    1.7.14. Green ICT

    TheDepartmentoDeence(Deence)implementedaGreenICTinitiativeinJune2008.By

    enorcingautomaticlog-oandthenautomaticshut-downonitsmajorPCfeet,thenumber

    omachinesletpoweredonaterhoursellrom50,000to3,000.Electricitysavingsromthis

    initiativeareexpectedtoexceed$5millionannually.Theequivalentcutingreenhousegas

    emissionsisexpectedtoexceed30,000tonnesannuallytheequivalentotaking7,500cars

    otheroadpermanently.

    1.8. VIEWS ON EXISTING WHOLE-OF-GOVERNMENT ARRANGEMENTS

    Agencieswereaskedortheirviewsonexistingwhole-o-governmentarrangementstoguide

    theGovernmentsuseandmanagementoICT.Severalrameworks,guides,strategiesand

    policiesalreadyexistwithinthewhole-o-governmentenvironment,andagencieswereasked

    toindicatetheirlevelouseotheserameworks,andanyissuesthatimpededuse.

    1.8.1. Current governance mechanisms

    Averysmallpooloagenciescommentedonthecurrentgovernancemechanisms,mainly

    agenciesthatareinvolvedintherelevantcommittees.Commentsweremadeonanindividual

    agencybasis.

    AgenciesreportedthattheSecretariesCommitteeonICT(SCICT)providesonlylimited

    guidance.Oneagencysaidthattheorumstrugglestodelivervalueoncollaborationandis

    strugglingtodetermineitslevelointeractionwithagencies.TheagencysaidthattheSCICT

    hasnoauthoritytobecriticalandailedtoaectdecisionscomingoutotheBudgetprocess.

    OneotheSCICTmemberssaidthattheyexpectedthattheorumwouldsharelearnings,butthisdidnothappen.Instead,theorumactedasasandtrap,slowingdowninitiativesrom

    agencies.PM&CsaidthattheGovernmentneedstoreviewtheSCICTstermsoreerenceand

    modusoperandi.OneagencysuggestedthattheSCICTcouldprovidevaluebyprovidingaline

    osightorwhole-o-governmentprogramstopoliticians.

    Agenciesreportedthatotherorums,suchastheCIOCommitteeandtheBusinessProcess

    TransormationCommittee,areuseulorsharingideas,althoughoneagencycommentedthat

    thesecommitteestendtoshareissuesratherthansolvethem.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    40/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    1.8.2. Views on the Australian Government Inormation Management Ofce

    Commentswereoeredbyagenciesonanindividualbasis.

    Oneagencynotedthat,whiletheaspirationbehindtheAustralianGovernmentInormation

    ManagementOce(AGIMO)wasgood,AGIMOhasbeenaroundorsometimeandthereis

    stillnoevidentreturnoninvestment.AnotheragencynotedthatAGIMOhasnoauthorityover

    agenciesandthatthiswasasignicantissue.OneagencynotedthatAGIMOsrolemightbe

    betterplacedinanotherpartogovernment,suchaswithinthePM&CCabinetImplementation

    Unit,asitsrolewithinFinancewasproblematicbecauseFinancesroleistoreduceexpenditure.

    AgencieseltthatAGIMOdoeshavearoletoplayintermsoleadingandacilitatingworkon

    architecture,rameworksandstandards.Therewassupportorexistingcentralrameworks,

    standards,bestpracticeguidesandservicessuchas:

    AustralianGovernmentArchitecture(7agencies)

    AustralianGovernmente-AuthenticationFramework(7agencies)

    AustralianGovernmentTelecommunicationsArrangements(6agencies)

    AustralianGovernmentTechnicalInteroperabilityFramework(5agencies)

    Betterpracticeguides(5agencies)

    BlackBerryguidance(5agencies)

    e-Governmentstrategy(5agencies)

    Fedlink(5agencies).

    1.8.3. Barriers to adoption

    Agencieswereaskedwhytheydidnotadoptwhole-o-governmentpolicies.

    Sevenagencies,indierentways,expressedaviewthatagenciesneededtoremain

    autonomousduetoeithertheuniquerequirementsotheirbusiness,orbecausetheycould

    driveabetterpricingdealasasingleentity.

    Fouragencieshighlightedthelackocommonstandardsandacommonlanguageasinhibiting

    whole-o-governmentapproaches.

    AnotherouragenciesobservedthatitisdiculttodeployAGIMOrameworksandguidanceas

    theGovernmentdoesnotprovideanyextraundingtoenableagenciestoadoptthesepolicies.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    41/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment

    1.8.4. Future coordination

    Nineagenciesstatedthattheysawvalueinsomeormostrongcentralleadershipand

    authoritytocoordinatewhole-o-governmentarrangementsincertainareas,orexample,architectureandbusinessprocessdesign.Fiveagenciesnotedthatanyrameworksand

    guidanceintroducedundersucharrangementswouldneedtobebackedbyastrongbusiness

    case,oropt-inprovisions.

    SevenagenciesexpressedconcernoveranytrendtocentraliseICTdecisionmakingthat

    couldnotaccommodateuniquerequirementsoin-houseandcollaborativeapplications

    development,duetothehighlyspecialisednatureoagencypurchases.Theseagencieseltthat

    thepossibleimpositionoawhole-o-governmentinitiativecouldaectanagencysabilityto

    operateecientlyandeectively.

    1.9. VIEWS ON DATA CENTRES

    Duringanumberoagencybilateralmeetings,theissueoinadequatecurrentdatacentre

    arrangementsarose.Keypointsraisedincluded:

    Age.WithewexceptionsCanberrasexistingdatacentreacilitiesareageingandexperience

    dicultymeetingtherequirementsocurrenttechnologyand/oravailabilitydemands.There

    areexamplesodatacentreswithintheACTthatarehostedbyprivateorganisationsthat

    havehadlittleinvestmenttoaccommodatechangingtechnologydemands.

    Power.AgenciesraisedconcernsoverCanberrasrelianceonasinglepowergrid.14

    Asubsequentsurveywasundertakenwiththe16largestagencies(excludingDeence)tohelp

    inormandquantiythemagnitudeothedatacentreissue.Table1.3containsahighlevel

    summaryondings.Inaddition,12otheagenciesidentiedhavingmorethanoneotheir

    datacentresintheACT.

    14 There are two eeds rom New South Wales to the single ACT electricity grid. One eed provides 85% o

    electricity to the ACT and the other 15%. The smaller 15% eed is only to the immediate Fyshwick area and is

    insufcient to support agency needs. Agencies with data centres in Canberra are thereore susceptible to thesingle ACT power eed.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    42/121

    Chapter One:ViewsromwithintheAustralianGovernment0

    Table 1.3 Summary of data centre locations of the 16 largest agencies(excluding Defence)

    Agencyself

    managed

    facility

    within

    ACT

    14SharedfacilitywithinACT 17

    TotaldatacentreslocatedinACT 31AgencyselfmanagedfacilityoutsideoftheACT 8(7ofthesebelongtotheABS)

    SharedfacilityoutsideofACT 6

    TotaldatacentresoutsideofACT 14Totaldatacentres 45

    Thissurveyalsoidentiedtheollowing:

    Capacity.Excludingremotesites,thetotalidentiedcapacityoragencydatacentresis

    10,484m.Thetotalidentiedunusedcapacityis1,815m.WithintheACTthetotalidentied

    capacityis8,316mwithanunusedcapacityo1,463m(17.6%).However,18datacentreswithin

    theACThaveidentiedashaving10morlessavailablecapacity.Wheretheagencyisnotinan

    existingsharedacilityanyunusedcapacityisnottranserabletoanotheragencyoruse.

    Availability.UsingtheTierClassicationSystemotheUptimeInstitute15ordatacentre

    availability,16otheidentieddatacentresarebelowthetierlevelidentiedbyagenciesthat

    meetstheircurrentminimumavailabilityrequirements.

    1.10. VIEWS ON THE ICT INDUSTRY

    Duringthebilateralmeetings,anumberoagenciesexpressedconcernsabouttheICTindustry

    basedontheirexperiences.Theseincluded:

    thatindustryrepeatedlyover-promisesintendersandunder-deliversinpractice

    industrydoesnotpracticewhatitsuggeststhatagenciesshoulddo

    thatthequalityoresourcesinimplementationdoesnotmatchthequalitypromisedduring

    tenderingandcontractnegotiations.

    1.11. ICT ARRANGEMENTS IN MINISTERIAL OFFICES

    Duringthecourseothereview,Iwasmadeawareoanissueaectinginteroperabilityo

    ICTsystemswithinministerialocesatParliamentHouse,Canberra.Thisissueservesas

    areminderotheimportanceointeroperability,commonsystems,andtheproblemsthat

    canresultromanautonomousapproachtoICTsystems.TheissueisoutsidetheTerms

    oReerenceormyreview,buttheconcernswerepassedontoFinance,whichhassome

    responsibilityorprovidingservicestoMinisters.

    15 See http://uptimeinstitute.org/wp_pd/(TUI3026E)TierClassifcationsDefneSiteInrastructure.pd

    Table 1.3 Summary o data centre locations o the 16 largest agencies(excluding Deence)

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    43/121

    Chapter Two:ViewsromoutsidetheAustralianGovernment

    chaPteR :

    views fRom outside theaustRalian goveRnmentThischaptersummarisesthekeythemesraisedbythoseoutsidetheAustralianGovernment

    (theGovernment)andrepresentstheviewso:

    ICTcompanies

    ICTindustryassociations(includingtheAustralianInormationIndustryAssociation(AIIA),

    AustralianIndustryGroup,andOpenSourceIndustryAustralia)

    consultingrmsworkingintheICTindustry

    individualsworkingintheICTindustry

    ICTrecruitmentrms

    oneproessionalbody

    onetradeunion

    oneacademicinstitution

    onestategovernment.

    Atotalo72submissionswereanalysed,with51othesehavingbeendirectlyinvitedto

    provideasubmissiontothereview(seeAppendixD).Thischapteralsotakesintoaccountviews

    raisedduringbilateralmeetingsandroundtablediscussionswithvariousexternalstakeholders

    andstategovernmentCIOs(seeAppendixE).

    2.1. BETTER UTILISATION OF ICT ASSETS

    TherewasageneralviewacrossindustrythatthereisagreatdealoduplicationoICTsystems,

    applicationsandinrastructurewithintheGovernment,stemmingromthedecentralised

    andindependentwayagencieshaveinvestedinICT.Manysubmissions(29)commentedonsignicantopportunitiesortheGovernmenttorealiseecienciesbyrationalising,

    standardising,consolidatingandsharingorre-usingcurrentassets.Inparticular,theollowing

    areaswerehighlighted.

    2.1.1. Bandwidth and network inrastructure

    Fourteensubmissionsindicatedthataggregatingandsharingnetworkconnectionsand

    gatewayscouldachievesignicantsavings.OnecompanypointedoutthattheGovernment

    otenhas2030datanetworkconnectionsperregionalcityortownacrossAustralia,witheachagencyimplementingadedicatedconnectionto/romCanberra.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    44/121

    Chapter Two:ViewsromoutsidetheAustralianGovernment

    Aew(4)alsoeltthatthephysicalbrethatmakesuptheIntraGovernmentCommunications

    Network(ICON)issignicantlyunder-used.Itcouldprovideaoundationorestablishinga

    sharednetworkedserviceinrastructureorarangeosharedservices,aswellasdeliveringan

    evenbroaderrangeotelecommunicationsservicesmorecost-eectively.

    2.1.2. Data centres

    Industrybelievedthatgrowthintechnologydemandischallengingthephysicalconstraints

    ondatacentresglobally,andtheGovernmentisnoexception.Industrybodiespointedtothe

    ollowingactorsashavinganimpactonthecurrentdatacentreacilitiesoagencies:

    Servergrowth.Gartner16estimatesthatthecurrentglobalcompoundannualgrowthrate

    oserversis12%,butoneindustrybodyhasidentiedittobeashighas18%orsome

    governmentdatacentres.Thiscontributessignicantlytodemandondatacentrefoorspace.

    Datacentrefoorspace.Despitemajoradvancesinconsolidationandservervirtualisation

    technology,Gartner17estimatesthatthedemandordatacentrefoorspaceisorecastto

    bearound510%ayear.Withmanydatacentreseitheratornearcapacity,thisposesa

    signicantissueormanyagencies.

    Heating,ventilationandair-conditioning(HVAC).Datacentresrequirestablethermal

    conditions.Thecurrentgrowthinpowerdensityduetochangingservertechnologyis

    projectedbyGartner18tobe3.5KW/m2overthenext5years.MostgovernmentHVAC

    systemsprovidepressurisedairviaaalsefoortothebaseoaserverrack,andthepractical

    limitationosuchasystemis1KW/m2.Thisdiscrepancywillseeanincreaseinthermal

    hotspots,andaconsequentneedtoimproveHVACdesignandimplementation.

    Growthindemandorpower.Asampleodatacentrepowerdemandoroneagencyshows

    thatdemandorpowerinitsdatacentrehasgrownby30%compoundannualgrowthrate

    overthepast5years(rom230KiloVolt-Ampsto850KiloVolt-Amps).

    Eciency.UsingtheUptimeInstitutesdatacentrecostmodellingtool,datacentreeconomy

    improvessignicantlybetween500m2and1,000m2.(Note:Othe45datacentresreerred

    toinsection1.9,onlyourexceed500m2).

    Weightandfoorloading.Currently,typicalgovernmentdatacentrefoorloadingcapability

    isabout450kilogramsperrack.Theweightonewservertechnologypopulatingtheseracks

    hasincreasedrom380kilogramsperracktoover1,000kilogramsperrackoverthepast

    5years.Asaresult,racksarenotbeingullyutilisedandthereisarequirementorimproved

    designandimplementationinordertoimprovefoorspaceutilisation,providedHVAC

    limitationscanalsobeovercome.

    16 Gartner (August 2006), A message rom data centre managers to CIOs: Floor space, power, and cooling will

    limit our growth.

    17 Ibid.18 Gartner (September 2007), U.S. data centers: The calm beore the storm.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    45/121

    Chapter Two:ViewsromoutsidetheAustralianGovernment

    Oneindustrybodyidentiedthatdatastoragedemandisgrowingbyasmuchas60%per

    annum.ThisgrowthimpactsonHVAC,foorspace,powerdemandandICTstanumbers.

    GreenICT.DatacentresarecontributingsignicantlytotheGovernmentscarbonootprint.AccordingtotheUptimeInstitute,datacentresaccountor0.5%ototalworldwideenergy

    consumption,andenergyconsumptionodatacentreshasdoubledbetween2000and2008.

    Intheabsenceoanoverarchingwhole-o-governmentviewondatacentres,agenciestendto

    provideorsourcetheiracilitiesautonomously.Thisleadstounnecessaryduplicationacross

    governmentonotonlydatacentreacilities,butduplicationindatacentreoperations,orexample,

    specialisedsupportstaandprocesses.Fourteensubmissionsindicatedthatconsolidatingagency

    datacentreacilitieshasthepotentialtorealisesignicantsavingsortheGovernment.

    2.1.2.1. Capacity management

    Thereviewsattentionwasdrawntoanalystsreportsquotingaveragecapacityutilisationo

    serversacrosstheindustryasbeingbetween15%and20%duringworkinghours.19Someelt

    thatbettercapacitymanagementwouldprovideaccesstocurrentuntappedorunder-utilised

    resources.Inaddition,atechniqueknownasservervirtualisationcouldmakebetteruseo

    existingprocessingcapacitywithinandacrossagencies.

    2.1.2.2. Storage

    Industrycommentedthatwithdataandinormationcontinuingtoexpandexponentiallyduetotheincreasingprevalenceodigitalcontentandthepervasivenessolegislativecompliance

    requirementspertainingtodata,eachagencyacesincreasingstoragerequirements.

    Consolidatingstorageintolargerepositorieswoulddrivecheaperpermegabytestoragecosts.20

    Inaddition,consolidationwouldenablethedeliveryodierentiatedhigh,mediumandlow

    availabilitystorageservicesbasedonneed.

    2.1.3. Consolidation/integration o service delivery channels

    TwelvesubmissionscommentedontheopportunityortheGovernmenttoenhanceservice

    deliverythroughintegrationandcollaborationacrossagencies,particularlythroughsingleentry

    pointsorgovernmentinormationandservices.Reducingthenumberocustomer-acing

    governmentportalswouldprovidegovernmentcustomers,citizensandbusinesseswitha

    singledoortoaccessthemajorityogovernmentservicesandreducethecostomaintaining

    multipleentrypoints.Aewsubmissionsalsomentionedthebettersharingootherservice

    deliverychannels,suchasace-to-aceandtelephone.

    19 Adrian Johnson (June 2007), Capacity utilisation - Asking the questions, MeasureIT Issue 5.06,

    http://www.cmg.org/measureit/issues/mit42/m_42_5.html20 Technically, it is possible to consolidate storage without actually consolidating data.

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    46/121

    Chapter Two:ViewsromoutsidetheAustralianGovernment

    2.1.4. Business systems and applications

    Somesubmissions(10)eltthatopportunitiescouldbegainedromstandardisingand

    rationalisingthemyriadobusinesssystemsandapplicationsagenciescurrentlyuse,particularlywithaviewtobettersharingandre-useamongagencies.Relatedtothis,our

    submissionscommentedonopportunitiesromrationalisingsotwarelicences.

    Thestategovernmentssubmissionidentiedthatithasalreadyseentheeectso

    rationalisationinitsdevelopmentenvironments.Inits200506baseline,50%oitsagencies

    requiredatleastourdierentapplicationdevelopmentskillsets,whichraisestrainingcosts

    andskillsmanagementoverheads,aswellasknowledgemanagementrisk.Thisgurewas

    reducedto29%in200607,accordingtoitsbaselinereporting.

    2.1.5. Inrastructure

    Somesubmissions(8)alsoeltthatthereareopportunitiestorationalise,consolidateandshare

    ICTinrastructure(suchascallcentres),particularlyorsmalleragencies,notingthatsome

    poolingandconsolidationorequirementswouldberequired.

    OnecompanysurmisedthattheGovernmentcouldsaveupto$100millionbyoptimisingits

    inrastructurealone.

    2.2. SHARED SERVICES

    Manysubmissions(29)consideredthatrationalising,standardisingandaggregatingbusiness

    systemsandapplicationsalsoenablesamovetosharedservicesacrossagencies.Bywayo

    comparison,11submissionsindicatedthatothergovernments(bothstateandinternational)

    haveprogressedurtherinthisarea.TheymentionedtheactivitiesotheVictorianand

    QueenslandGovernments,andtheUSandUKGovernments,andsuggestedthatthe

    Governmentexploreandlearnromtheirexperiences.

    Thetopcandidatessuggestedbyindustryorsharedservicesincluded:

    nancialandhumanresourcesmanagementandpayroll(20mentions)

    procurement,purchasingandcontracting(10mentions)

    document/recordsmanagement(eightmentions)

    paymentprocessing(sixmentions)

    securityandauthentication(vementions)

    identityandaccessmanagement(vementions)

    grantsmanagement(vementions).

  • 7/28/2019 Review of the Australian Governments Use of Information and Communication Technology

    47/121

    Chapter Two:ViewsromoutsidetheAustralianGovernment

    Whileindustrywasgenerallyoptimisticaboutthepotentialosharedservices,theyalso

    notedthatsharedservicesandsystemsinevitablyinvolveadegreeocompromisethatcan

    exposethedierentbusinessexpectationsocustomers.Thissentimentwasechoedinthe

    meetingsIheldwithstategovernmentCIOs.Whiletheyacknowledgedthepotentialbenets

    osharedservices,theycommentedonthesignicantchallengesandrisksassociatedwith