Review of the ADC for the LAr trigger upgrade Introduction.

6
Review of the ADC for the LAr trigger upgrade Introduction

Transcript of Review of the ADC for the LAr trigger upgrade Introduction.

Page 1: Review of the ADC for the LAr trigger upgrade Introduction.

Review of the ADC for the

LAr trigger upgrade

Introduction

Page 2: Review of the ADC for the LAr trigger upgrade Introduction.

Mandate• To recommend the use of one of the three possible ADCs being currently

considered

• The selection criteria should take into account the following points:– Measured performances of (at least) a 2-channel ADC (ENOB, INL and DNL, power

consumption, latency budget, ...) compared to the requirements– Measured performances with radiation (TID, NIEL, SEU) and their impact on the

installed system– Procurement schedule for the total quantity (this includes design time if needed)– QA process for guarantying the radiation hardness of the production– Interface to the serialiser (i.e. what is needed in between the ADC and the serialiser)– Costs and resources (costs - production+packaging for ASICs/production+single-lot

premium for COTS, manpower resources for design/manuf./testing)– Maintenance requirements (spares, etc.)– Possible impact on Phase-2 upgrade

Page 3: Review of the ADC for the LAr trigger upgrade Introduction.

Review Committee• Reviewers:

– Francis Anghinolfi (CERN)– Ian Brawn (RAL)– Paul Hanke (Heidelberg)– Walter Snoeys (CERN)– Philippe Farthouat (CERN, Chair)

• Ex-officio:– Martin Aleksa, LAr PL– Bill Cleland, LAr upgrade FE electronics coordinator– Beniamino Di Girolamo, TC– Ariella Cattai, TC– Luis Hervas, Phase I Upgrade coordinator– Francesco Lanni, Phase I Upgrade coordinator

Page 4: Review of the ADC for the LAr trigger upgrade Introduction.

Agenda and Documentation

• Each proposed solution team has got a 1-hour slot– To be freely organised

• Documentation has been available enough time in advance – Thanks

Page 5: Review of the ADC for the LAr trigger upgrade Introduction.

Requirements

Sampling rate

Dynamic range

ENOB INL DNL Power Radiation Qualification

≥ 40 Ms/s 12 b ≥ 11 b ≤ 1 LSB ≤ 1 LSB

≤ 145 mW TID: ~100 kRadNIEL: 1013 neutrons.cm-2

SEE: 6 1013 hadrons. cm-2

• Additional constraints– A lot of channels on a board in the front-end

crate• Multichannel device

– TID and NIEL not expected to be huge problem but SEE might be

Page 6: Review of the ADC for the LAr trigger upgrade Introduction.

Procedure

• Today we’ll hear the three proposals • A number of people on Vidyo– Do not speak without a microphone

• Closed session at the end of the meeting• Decision and report might take a bit of time

but should be within 2 weeks