Review of the ADC for the LAr trigger upgrade Introduction.
-
Upload
ruby-austin -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
3
Transcript of Review of the ADC for the LAr trigger upgrade Introduction.
Review of the ADC for the
LAr trigger upgrade
Introduction
Mandate• To recommend the use of one of the three possible ADCs being currently
considered
• The selection criteria should take into account the following points:– Measured performances of (at least) a 2-channel ADC (ENOB, INL and DNL, power
consumption, latency budget, ...) compared to the requirements– Measured performances with radiation (TID, NIEL, SEU) and their impact on the
installed system– Procurement schedule for the total quantity (this includes design time if needed)– QA process for guarantying the radiation hardness of the production– Interface to the serialiser (i.e. what is needed in between the ADC and the serialiser)– Costs and resources (costs - production+packaging for ASICs/production+single-lot
premium for COTS, manpower resources for design/manuf./testing)– Maintenance requirements (spares, etc.)– Possible impact on Phase-2 upgrade
Review Committee• Reviewers:
– Francis Anghinolfi (CERN)– Ian Brawn (RAL)– Paul Hanke (Heidelberg)– Walter Snoeys (CERN)– Philippe Farthouat (CERN, Chair)
• Ex-officio:– Martin Aleksa, LAr PL– Bill Cleland, LAr upgrade FE electronics coordinator– Beniamino Di Girolamo, TC– Ariella Cattai, TC– Luis Hervas, Phase I Upgrade coordinator– Francesco Lanni, Phase I Upgrade coordinator
Agenda and Documentation
• Each proposed solution team has got a 1-hour slot– To be freely organised
• Documentation has been available enough time in advance – Thanks
Requirements
Sampling rate
Dynamic range
ENOB INL DNL Power Radiation Qualification
≥ 40 Ms/s 12 b ≥ 11 b ≤ 1 LSB ≤ 1 LSB
≤ 145 mW TID: ~100 kRadNIEL: 1013 neutrons.cm-2
SEE: 6 1013 hadrons. cm-2
• Additional constraints– A lot of channels on a board in the front-end
crate• Multichannel device
– TID and NIEL not expected to be huge problem but SEE might be
Procedure
• Today we’ll hear the three proposals • A number of people on Vidyo– Do not speak without a microphone
• Closed session at the end of the meeting• Decision and report might take a bit of time
but should be within 2 weeks