REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

65
Reports available online at: www2.hawaii.edu/iro/ REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI> I COMMUNITY COLLEGES FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 Institutional Research Office University of Hawai>i June 1997 File Reference: Management and Planning Support Folder, National Comparisons

Transcript of REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Page 1: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Reports available online at: www2.hawaii.edu/iro/

REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES:

PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI>>I COMMUNITY COLLEGES

FISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Institutional Research Office

University of Hawai>i

June 1997

File Reference: Management and Planning Support Folder, National Comparisons

Page 2: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

UH Community Colleges Benchmark ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Revenues per FTE Student

$1,657

$4,361

$124

$6,142

$878

$5,064

$40

$5,983

$878

$5,747

$41

$6,666

Tuition & Fees

Appropriations

Gifts, Contracts& Endowment

Income

Total Revenue

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000

Benchmark Group Average

UHCC

UHCC (Including Systemwide Revenues)

Figure 1

Page 3: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

UH Community Colleges Benchmark ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Expenditures per FTE Student

$3,756

$714

$406

$130

$998

$708

$155

$3,636

$619

$643

$32

$450

$590

$631

$3,658

$629

$725

$32

$1,269

$605

$631

Instruction

StudentServices

AcademicSupport

Library

InstitutionalSupport

Operations /Maintenance

PublicServices

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000

Benchmark Group Average

UHCC

UHCC (Including Systemwide Expenditures)

Figure 2

Page 4: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

REVENUES & EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONSUNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGES

FISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Introduction and Sources

This report presents information comparing the UH Community Colleges to benchmark andpeer group institutions on selected financial measures. Included are data on enrollment,revenues and expenditures. The raw numbers have been converted to a full-timeequivalent (FTE) basis to facilitate comparison between institutions with varyingenrollment. The primary data sources for this report were the Integrated Postsecondary EducationData System (IPEDS) Finance Survey, FY 1993-94 and the IPEDS Fall Enrollment Survey,Fall 1993. The immediate source is the publication entitled Higher Education Revenues& Expenditures, FY 1993-94 (institutional data, text and data disk) published by ResearchAssociates of Washington. The database provided contains the financial data per FTEstudent already calculated. The total revenue and total expenditure figures shown in thetables were computed as simple sums and appended to the database by the UHInstitutional Research Office.

Definitions of the benchmark and peer groups, as well as descriptions of the variousfinancial measures presented in the tables, may be found in Appendix H.

Description of the Tables

Table 1 shows data on enrollment, revenues per FTE student and expenditures per FTEstudent for each campus in the UH Community Colleges (UHCC) system benchmarkgroup. Figures establishing the range of values for each item (high and low) as well as amean value for the benchmark group (excluding UHCC) are shown at the bottom of eachcolumn. The ranking for UHCC (highest = 1) is also shown for each item, by column.Table 2 shows the percent distribution of the data presented in Table 1. Revenue itemsand expenditure items sum independently to 100% for each institution.

Table 3 presents the same data as shown in Table 1, except that the UHCC figures includethe UH system and UH Community College systemwide revenues and expenditures,apportioned across UH campuses (see Appendix H, Systemwide Revenues &Expenditures, for more discussion). Table 4 provides the percent distribution of the datain Table 3. The UHCC benchmark group institutions are listed in Table 5.

A similar set of tables is provided for each UH Community College (Appendixes A to G).These tables provide enrollment, revenue and expenditure data for each UHCC campus,with comparison to the corresponding peer group institutions. The fifth table in each setlists the institutions in the peer group for the given UHCC campus.

Page 5: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Highlights

! The UH Community Colleges had FTE enrollment in Fall 1993 of 15,984, comparedto a benchmark group average of 12,570 (Table 1). The UH Community Collegesranked third in enrollment among the twelve schools in the benchmark group. Ingeneral, the individual campuses in the UH Community College system rankedtoward the middle of their respective peer groups in FTE enrollment.

! The UH Community Colleges ranked 7 (of 12) in the benchmark group in totalth

revenues. Total revenues per FTE student for UH Community Colleges were$5,983 in fiscal year 1993-94, compared to the benchmark group average of $6,142(Figure 1). The individual campuses tended to rank high in their respective peergroups in total revenues (Tables A1 to G1). Four campuses (Honolulu CC, Kaua‘iCC, Maui CC and Windward CC) ranked 1 in their peer groups in total revenues.st

! The UH Community Colleges ranked 5 in appropriations and 11 (of 12) in tuitionth th

and fee revenues. In general, the individual UH Community College campusesranked high in appropriations and low in tuition and fees revenues in theirrespective peer groups (Figures A1 to G1). The individual campuses tended torank toward the middle in gifts, contracts and endowment income.

! The addition of systemwide revenues to the calculations per FTE student has littleoverall effect on the rankings for the UHCC campuses. Kapi‘olani CC improvesfrom 8 to 4 in total revenues, while Leeward improves from 5 to 2 . (Figures A1th th th nd

to G1 compare the UHCC campuses to their peer group averages for revenues.)

! Due to fiscal interconnections between Hawai‘i CC and UH Hilo during the timeperiod covered in this report, revenue and expenditure items at Hawai‘i CC mayhave been included with UH Hilo. Therefore, the revenue and expenditure per FTEfigures given in this report for Hawai‘i CC may be understated.

! Total expenditures per FTE student for UH Community Colleges were slightlylower than the benchmark group average (Table 1). The UH Community Collegeshad $6,851 in total expenditures per FTE student in FY 1993-94, compared to abenchmark group average of $7,451. The UH Community Colleges ranked 8 inth

total expenditures.

! The rankings for the individual UHCC campuses in total expenditures varied widely.Hawai‘i CC ranked last in it’s peer group in total revenues, while Kaua‘i CC rankedfirst and Honolulu CC second (Tables A1 to G1).

! The individual UH Community College campuses tended to rank high in instruction,academic support and public service expenditures, and low in library and studentaid expenditures. The rankings were mixed for the other expenditure items, withsome campuses ranking high and other lower (Figures A2 to G2).

Page 6: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

! The addition of systemwide expenditures to the UH Community College calculationsper FTE student improves the rankings for total expenditures only slightly, from 8th

to 7 . Among the individual campuses, the addition of systemwide expendituresth

had pronounced effect at only three campuses: Leeward CC improved from 8 toth

4 , Maui CC improved from 4 to 2 and Windward CC improved from 5 to 1 .th th nd th st

Summary

As with other UH campuses, the UH Community Colleges tend to have higher stateappropriation revenues and lower tuition and fee revenues per FTE student than their peergroup institutions. Expenditures for instruction, academic support and public service tendto be relatively high for the UH Community Colleges, while expenditures for library andstudent aid tend to be relatively low when compared to the peer group institutions.

Page 7: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Table 1UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGES

BENCHMARK GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AZ Mesa Community College 10,657 0 1,248 2,729 455 4,432 2,378 302 281 79 281 271 3,507 0 19 502 4,033

2 CA City College of San Francisco 13,769 0 551 6,197 60 6,809 4,127 1,044 376 99 1,301 1,070 7,900 20 40 600 8,577

3 FL Miami-Dade Community College 27,271 0 1,973 3,877 285 6,135 3,644 758 570 228 1,300 782 7,036 7 53 1,261 8,374

4 HI UH Community Colleges 15,984 0 878 5,064 40 5,983 3,636 619 643 32 450 590 5,748 3 631 279 6,851

5 IA Kirkwood Community College 6,678 0 2,154 2,758 47 4,959 3,141 508 596 89 851 516 5,612 0 0 666 6,278

6 IL College of Du Page 16,161 0 1,278 2,999 11 4,288 2,348 372 165 165 719 473 3,988 0 302 107 4,487

7 NY Nassau Community College 14,864 0 2,493 4,213 21 6,726 4,557 467 193 193 770 1,048 7,006 0 96 629 7,759

8 OH Cuyahoga Com College District 14,257 0 1,804 5,088 50 6,942 3,070 728 879 135 1,259 693 6,556 0 244 1,066 7,939

9 OR Lane Community College 5,616 0 2,235 5,717 198 8,149 5,539 862 356 140 1,046 625 8,213 0 717 858 10,002

10 OR Mount Hood Community College 4,973 0 1,572 3,918 0 5,490 3,169 1,373 278 108 1,807 904 7,457 18 230 652 8,431

11 OR Portland Community College 12,096 0 1,416 3,933 232 5,581 3,654 494 546 139 804 481 5,979 0 0 696 6,675

12 WI Milwaukee Technical College 11,931 0 1,505 6,542 0 8,047 5,685 950 226 60 840 929 8,621 34 0 744 9,409

HIGH Excluding 27,271 0 2,493 6,542 455 8,149 5,685 1,373 879 228 1,807 1,070 8,621 34 717 1,261 10,002

AVERAGE UHCC 12,570 0 1,657 4,361 124 6,142 3,756 714 406 130 998 708 6,534 7 155 707 7,451

LOW 4,973 0 551 2,729 0 4,288 2,348 302 165 60 281 271 3,507 0 0 107 4,033

UHCC RANK (of 12) 3 NA 11 5 8 7 7 7 2 12 11 8 9 5 2 11 8

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Note: Data unavailable for Montgomery College of Rockville, Rockville, MD or St. Louis Community College, St. Louis, MO.

Page 8: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Table 2UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGES

BENCHMARK GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AZ Mesa Community College 10,657 0 28 62 10 100% 59 7 7 2 7 7 87 0 0 12 100%

2 CA City College of San Francisco 13,769 0 8 91 1 100% 48 12 4 1 15 12 92 0 0 7 100%

3 FL Miami-Dade Community College 27,271 0 32 63 5 100% 44 9 7 3 16 9 84 0 1 15 100%

4 HI UH Community Colleges 15,984 0 15 85 1 100% 53 9 9 0 7 9 84 0 9 4 100%

5 IA Kirkwood Community College 6,678 0 43 56 1 100% 50 8 10 1 14 8 89 0 0 11 100%

6 IL College of Du Page 16,161 0 30 70 0 100% 52 8 4 4 16 11 89 0 7 2 100%

7 NY Nassau Community College 14,864 0 37 63 0 100% 59 6 2 2 10 14 90 0 1 8 100%

8 OH Cuyahoga Com College District 14,257 0 26 73 1 100% 39 9 11 2 16 9 83 0 3 13 100%

9 OR Lane Community College 5,616 0 27 70 2 100% 55 9 4 1 10 6 82 0 7 9 100%

10 OR Mount Hood Community College 4,973 0 29 71 0 100% 38 16 3 1 21 11 88 0 3 8 100%

11 OR Portland Community College 12,096 0 25 70 4 100% 55 7 8 2 12 7 90 0 0 10 100%

12 WI Milwaukee Technical College 11,931 0 19 81 0 100% 60 10 2 1 9 10 92 0 0 8 100%

HIGH Excluding 27,271 0 43 91 10 100% 60 16 11 4 21 14 92 0 7 15 100%

AVERAGE UHCC 12,570 0 28 70 2 100% 51 9 6 2 13 9 88 0 2 9 100%

LOW 4,973 0 8 56 0 100% 38 6 2 1 7 6 82 0 0 2 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Note: Data unavailable for Montgomery College of Rockville, Rockville, MD or St. Louis Community College, St. Louis, MO.

Page 9: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Table 3UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGES

BENCHMARK GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AZ Mesa Community College 10,657 0 1,248 2,729 455 4,432 2,378 302 281 79 281 271 3,507 0 19 502 4,033

2 CA City College of San Francisco 13,769 0 551 6,197 60 6,809 4,127 1,044 376 99 1,301 1,070 7,900 20 40 600 8,577

3 FL Miami-Dade Community College 27,271 0 1,973 3,877 285 6,135 3,644 758 570 228 1,300 782 7,036 7 53 1,261 8,374

4 HI UH Community Colleges 15,984 0 878 5,747 41 6,666 3,658 629 725 32 1,269 605 6,696 3 631 279 7,799

5 IA Kirkwood Community College 6,678 0 2,154 2,758 47 4,959 3,141 508 596 89 851 516 5,612 0 0 666 6,278

6 IL College of Du Page 16,161 0 1,278 2,999 11 4,288 2,348 372 165 165 719 473 3,988 0 302 107 4,487

7 NY Nassau Community College 14,864 0 2,493 4,213 21 6,726 4,557 467 193 193 770 1,048 7,006 0 96 629 7,759

8 OH Cuyahoga Com College District 14,257 0 1,804 5,088 50 6,942 3,070 728 879 135 1,259 693 6,556 0 244 1,066 7,939

9 OR Lane Community College 5,616 0 2,235 5,717 198 8,149 5,539 862 356 140 1,046 625 8,213 0 717 858 10,002

10 OR Mount Hood Community College 4,973 0 1,572 3,918 0 5,490 3,169 1,373 278 108 1,807 904 7,457 18 230 652 8,431

11 OR Portland Community College 12,096 0 1,416 3,933 232 5,581 3,654 494 546 139 804 481 5,979 0 0 696 6,675

12 WI Milwaukee Technical College 11,931 0 1,505 6,542 0 8,047 5,685 950 226 60 840 929 8,621 34 0 744 9,409

HIGH Excluding 27,271 0 2,493 6,542 455 8,149 5,685 1,373 879 228 1,807 1,070 8,621 34 717 1,261 10,002

AVERAGE UHCC 12,570 0 1,657 4,361 124 6,142 3,756 714 406 130 998 708 6,534 7 155 707 7,451

LOW 4,973 0 551 2,729 0 4,288 2,348 302 165 60 281 271 3,507 0 0 107 4,033

UHCC RANK (of 12) 3 NA 11 3 8 6 5 7 2 12 4 8 7 5 2 11 7

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Note: Data unavailable for Montgomery College of Rockville, Rockville, MD or St. Louis Community College, St. Louis, MO.

Page 10: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Table 4UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGES

BENCHMARK GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AZ Mesa Community College 10,657 0 28 62 10 100% 59 7 7 2 7 7 87 0 0 12 100%

2 CA City College of San Francisco 13,769 0 8 91 1 100% 48 12 4 1 15 12 92 0 0 7 100%

3 FL Miami-Dade Community College 27,271 0 32 63 5 100% 44 9 7 3 16 9 84 0 1 15 100%

4 HI UH Community Colleges 15,984 0 13 86 1 100% 47 8 9 0 16 8 86 0 8 4 100%

5 IA Kirkwood Community College 6,678 0 43 56 1 100% 50 8 10 1 14 8 89 0 0 11 100%

6 IL College of Du Page 16,161 0 30 70 0 100% 52 8 4 4 16 11 89 0 7 2 100%

7 NY Nassau Community College 14,864 0 37 63 0 100% 59 6 2 2 10 14 90 0 1 8 100%

8 OH Cuyahoga Com College District 14,257 0 26 73 1 100% 39 9 11 2 16 9 83 0 3 13 100%

9 OR Lane Community College 5,616 0 27 70 2 100% 55 9 4 1 10 6 82 0 7 9 100%

10 OR Mount Hood Community College 4,973 0 29 71 0 100% 38 16 3 1 21 11 88 0 3 8 100%

11 OR Portland Community College 12,096 0 25 70 4 100% 55 7 8 2 12 7 90 0 0 10 100%

12 WI Milwaukee Technical College 11,931 0 19 81 0 100% 60 10 2 1 9 10 92 0 0 8 100%

HIGH Excluding 27,271 0 43 91 10 100% 60 16 11 4 21 14 92 0 7 15 100%

AVERAGE UHCC 12,570 0 28 70 2 100% 51 9 6 2 13 9 88 0 2 9 100%

LOW 4,973 0 8 56 0 100% 38 6 2 1 7 6 82 0 0 2 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Note: Data unavailable for Montgomery College of Rockville, Rockville, MD or St. Louis Community College, St. Louis, MO.

Page 11: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Table 5UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGES

BENCHMARK GROUPFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

FICE ENROLLMENT

STATE NAME CITY CODE FTE %

ENROLL Grad

1 AZ Mesa Community College Mesa 1077 10,657 0

2 CA City College of San Francisco San Francisco 1167 13,769 0

3 FL Miami-Dade Community College Miami 1506 27,271 0

4 HI UH Community Colleges State of Hawai‘i UHCC 15,984 0

5 IA Kirkwood Community College Cedar Rapids 4076 6,678 0

6 IL College of Du Page Glen Ellyn 6656 16,161 0

7 MD Montgomery College of Rockville Rockville 2082 7,750

8 MO St Louis Community College Saint Louis 2471 3,461

9 NY Nassau Community College Garden City 2873 14,864 0

10 OH Cuyahoga Com College District Cleveland 3040 14,257 0

11 OR Lane Community College Eugene 3196 5,616 0

12 OR Mount Hood Community College Gresham 3204 4,973 0

13 OR Portland Community College Portland 3213 12,096 0

14 WI Milwaukee Technical College Milwaukee 3866 11,931 0

Note: Revenue and expenditure data were not available for Montgomery College of Rockville,

Rockville, MD, or St. Louis Community College, St. Louis, MO, for fiscal year 1993-94.

Therefore, these institutions are not listed in the benchmark or peer group comparison tables.

Page 12: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Hawai‘i Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Revenues per FTE Student

$1,184

$4,998

$53

$6,235

$662

$4,073

$52

$4,787

$662

$4,623

$53

$5,338

Tuition & Fees

Appropriations

Gifts, Contracts& Endowment

Income

Total Revenue

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000

Peer Group Average

Hawai‘i CC

Hawai‘i CC (Including Systemwide Revenues)

Figure A1

Revenue items at Hawai‘i CC may have been included with UH Hilo. Therefore, the Hawai‘i CC figures may be understated.

Page 13: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Hawai‘i Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Expenditures per FTE Student

$3,277

$769

$711

$144

$984

$648

$190

$4,045

$506

$144

$0

$239

$92

$469

$4,070

$514

$163

$0

$672

$94

$469

Instruction

StudentServices

AcademicSupport

Library

InstitutionalSupport

Operations /Maintenance

PublicServices

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000

Peer Group Average

Hawai‘i CC

Hawai‘i CC (Including Systemwide Expenditures)

Figure A2

Expenditure items at Hawai‘i CC may have been included with UH Hilo. Therefore, the Hawai‘i CC figures may be understated.

Page 14: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix A1HAWAI‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT 1/ EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT 1/

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 2/ Approp GC/E REV 2/ Instr SS AS 3/ Lib 3/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Lassen College 1,531 0 601 5,732 8 6,341 3,119 994 691 98 875 639 6,300 0 63 542 6,924

2 HI Hawai‘i Community College 1,744 0 662 4,073 52 4,787 4,045 506 144 0 239 92 4,883 3 469 636 6,134

3 HI Windward Community College 969 0 826 5,758 0 6,584 3,297 1,058 918 44 771 492 6,417 0 397 301 7,234

4 ID College Of Southern Idaho 2,599 0 1,540 5,087 127 6,754 2,844 594 804 157 880 1,087 5,788 0 1,402 1,209 8,820

5 ID North Idaho College 2,401 0 1,339 5,388 124 6,851 3,505 692 774 256 1,099 763 6,789 0 148 1,092 8,073

6 NC Catawba Valley Com College 1,987 0 1,010 5,671 38 6,719 3,402 465 644 165 933 495 5,940 0 0 351 6,291

7 NC Lenoir Community College 1,404 0 854 5,667 78 6,598 4,022 716 488 211 873 656 6,754 0 0 749 7,502

8 NE Northeast Community College 2,103 0 1,270 4,174 120 5,564 3,469 553 396 65 1,231 484 6,132 0 0 872 7,004

9 NM San Juan College 2,166 0 670 5,463 46 6,179 2,728 762 849 164 839 753 5,918 0 40 763 6,734

10 OR Rogue Community College 1,842 0 1,774 3,600 44 5,418 3,282 824 902 127 1,010 387 6,394 0 36 1,411 7,853

11 SC Piedmont Technical College 1,793 0 1,816 3,808 0 5,623 3,051 1,170 499 115 1,287 701 6,707 0 0 828 7,535

12 SC Sumter Area Technical College 1,366 0 1,323 4,630 0 5,953 3,331 631 856 179 1,026 671 6,514 0 0 1,445 7,959

HIGH Excluding 2,599 0 1,816 5,758 127 6,851 4,022 1,170 918 256 1,287 1,087 6,789 0 1,402 1,445 8,820

AVERAGE HAWAI‘I CC 1,833 0 1,184 4,998 53 6,235 3,277 769 711 144 984 648 6,332 0 190 869 7,448

LOW 969 0 601 3,600 0 5,418 2,728 465 396 44 771 387 5,788 0 0 301 6,291

HAWAI‘I CC RANK (of 12) 8 NA 11 10 5 12 1 11 12 12 12 12 12 1 2 9 12

1/ Due to fiscal interconnections between Hawai‘i CC and UH Hilo during the time period covered in this report, revenue and expenditure items at Hawai‘i CC may have been included with UH Hilo.

Therefore, the figures given here for Hawai‘i CC may be understated.

2/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

3/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 15: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix A2HAWAI‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Percent Distribution

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT 1/ EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT 1/

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 2/ Approp GC/E REV 2/ Instr SS AS 3/ Lib 3/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Lassen College 1,531 0 9 90 0 100% 45 14 10 1 13 9 91 0 1 8 100%

2 HI Hawai‘i Community College 1,744 0 14 85 1 100% 66 8 2 0 4 1 80 0 8 10 100%

3 HI Windward Community College 969 0 13 87 0 100% 46 15 13 1 11 7 89 0 5 4 100%

4 ID College Of Southern Idaho 2,599 0 23 75 2 100% 32 7 9 2 10 12 66 0 16 14 100%

5 ID North Idaho College 2,401 0 20 79 2 100% 43 9 10 3 14 9 84 0 2 14 100%

6 NC Catawba Valley Com College 1,987 0 15 84 1 100% 54 7 10 3 15 8 94 0 0 6 100%

7 NC Lenoir Community College 1,404 0 13 86 1 100% 54 10 7 3 12 9 90 0 0 10 100%

8 NE Northeast Community College 2,103 0 23 75 2 100% 50 8 6 1 18 7 88 0 0 12 100%

9 NM San Juan College 2,166 0 11 88 1 100% 41 11 13 2 12 11 88 0 1 11 100%

10 OR Rogue Community College 1,842 0 33 66 1 100% 42 10 11 2 13 5 81 0 0 18 100%

11 SC Piedmont Technical College 1,793 0 32 68 0 100% 40 16 7 2 17 9 89 0 0 11 100%

12 SC Sumter Area Technical College 1,366 0 22 78 0 100% 42 8 11 2 13 8 82 0 0 18 100%

HIGH Excluding 2,599 0 33 90 2 100% 54 16 13 3 18 12 94 0 16 18 100%

AVERAGE HAWAI‘I CC 1,833 0 19 80 1 100% 44 10 10 2 13 9 86 0 2 11 100%

LOW 969 0 9 66 0 100% 32 7 6 1 10 5 66 0 0 4 100%

1/ Due to fiscal interconnections between Hawai‘i CC and UH Hilo during the time period covered in this report, revenue and expenditure items at Hawai‘i CC may have been included with UH Hilo.

Therefore, the figures given here for Hawai‘i CC may be understated.

2/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

3/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 16: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix A3HAWAI‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT 1/ EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT 1/

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 2/ Approp GC/E REV 2/ Instr SS AS 3/ Lib 3/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Lassen College 1,531 0 601 5,732 8 6,341 3,119 994 691 98 875 639 6,300 0 63 542 6,924

2 HI Hawai‘i Community College 1,744 0 662 4,623 53 5,338 4,070 514 163 0 672 94 5,371 3 469 636 6,621

3 HI Windward Community College 969 0 826 6,534 0 7,360 3,317 1,074 1,035 44 2,175 505 7,987 0 397 301 8,804

4 ID College Of Southern Idaho 2,599 0 1,540 5,087 127 6,754 2,844 594 804 157 880 1,087 5,788 0 1,402 1,209 8,820

5 ID North Idaho College 2,401 0 1,339 5,388 124 6,851 3,505 692 774 256 1,099 763 6,789 0 148 1,092 8,073

6 NC Catawba Valley Com College 1,987 0 1,010 5,671 38 6,719 3,402 465 644 165 933 495 5,940 0 0 351 6,291

7 NC Lenoir Community College 1,404 0 854 5,667 78 6,598 4,022 716 488 211 873 656 6,754 0 0 749 7,502

8 NE Northeast Community College 2,103 0 1,270 4,174 120 5,564 3,469 553 396 65 1,231 484 6,132 0 0 872 7,004

9 NM San Juan College 2,166 0 670 5,463 46 6,179 2,728 762 849 164 839 753 5,918 0 40 763 6,734

10 OR Rogue Community College 1,842 0 1,774 3,600 44 5,418 3,282 824 902 127 1,010 387 6,394 0 36 1,411 7,853

11 SC Piedmont Technical College 1,793 0 1,816 3,808 0 5,623 3,051 1,170 499 115 1,287 701 6,707 0 0 828 7,535

12 SC Sumter Area Technical College 1,366 0 1,323 4,630 0 5,953 3,331 631 856 179 1,026 671 6,514 0 0 1,445 7,959

HIGH Excluding 2,599 0 1,816 6,534 127 7,360 4,022 1,170 1,035 256 2,175 1,087 7,987 0 1,402 1,445 8,820

AVERAGE HAWAI‘I CC 1,833 0 1,184 5,069 53 6,305 3,279 770 722 144 1,112 649 6,475 0 190 869 7,591

LOW 969 0 601 3,600 0 5,418 2,728 465 396 44 839 387 5,788 0 0 301 6,291

HAWAI‘I CC RANK (of 12) 8 NA 11 9 5 12 1 11 12 12 12 12 12 1 2 9 11

1/ Due to fiscal interconnections between Hawai‘i CC and UH Hilo during the time period covered in this report, revenue and expenditure items at Hawai‘i CC may have been included with UH Hilo.

Therefore, the figures given here for Hawai‘i CC may be understated.

2/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

3/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 17: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix A4HAWAI‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Percent Distribution

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT 1/ EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT 1/

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 2/ Approp GC/E REV 2/ Instr SS AS 3/ Lib 3/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Lassen College 1,531 0 9 90 0 100% 45 14 10 1 13 9 91 0 1 8 100%

2 HI Hawai‘i Community College 1,744 0 12 87 1 100% 61 8 2 0 10 1 81 0 7 10 100%

3 HI Windward Community College 969 0 11 89 0 100% 38 12 12 0 25 6 91 0 5 3 100%

4 ID College Of Southern Idaho 2,599 0 23 75 2 100% 32 7 9 2 10 12 66 0 16 14 100%

5 ID North Idaho College 2,401 0 20 79 2 100% 43 9 10 3 14 9 84 0 2 14 100%

6 NC Catawba Valley Com College 1,987 0 15 84 1 100% 54 7 10 3 15 8 94 0 0 6 100%

7 NC Lenoir Community College 1,404 0 13 86 1 100% 54 10 7 3 12 9 90 0 0 10 100%

8 NE Northeast Community College 2,103 0 23 75 2 100% 50 8 6 1 18 7 88 0 0 12 100%

9 NM San Juan College 2,166 0 11 88 1 100% 41 11 13 2 12 11 88 0 1 11 100%

10 OR Rogue Community College 1,842 0 33 66 1 100% 42 10 11 2 13 5 81 0 0 18 100%

11 SC Piedmont Technical College 1,793 0 32 68 0 100% 40 16 7 2 17 9 89 0 0 11 100%

12 SC Sumter Area Technical College 1,366 0 22 78 0 100% 42 8 11 2 13 8 82 0 0 18 100%

HIGH Excluding 2,599 0 33 90 2 100% 54 16 13 3 25 12 94 0 16 18 100%

AVERAGE HAWAI‘I CC 1,833 0 19 80 1 100% 44 10 10 2 15 8 86 0 2 11 100%

LOW 969 0 9 66 0 100% 32 7 6 0 10 5 66 0 0 3 100%

1/ Due to fiscal interconnections between Hawai‘i CC and UH Hilo during the time period covered in this report, revenue and expenditure items at Hawai‘i CC may have been included with UH Hilo.

Therefore, the figures given here for Hawai‘i CC may be understated.

2/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

3/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 18: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix A5HAWAI‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUPFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

CARNEGIE FICE ENROLLMENT

STATE CLASSIFICATION NAME CITY CODE FTE %

ENROLL Grad

1 CA 09-Assoc Lassen College Susanville 1217 1,531 0

2 HI 09-Assoc Hawai‘i Community College Hilo 5258 1,744 0

3 HI 09-Assoc Windward Community College Kaneohe 10390 969 0

4 ID 09-Assoc College Of Southern Idaho Twin Falls 1619 2,599 0

5 ID 09-Assoc North Idaho College Coeur D'Alene 1623 2,401 0

6 NC 09-Assoc Catawba Valley Comm College Hickory 5318 1,987 0

7 NC 09-Assoc Lenoir Community College Kinston 2940 1,404 0

8 NE 09-Assoc Northeast Community College Norfolk 11667 2,103 0

9 NM 09-Assoc San Juan College Farmington 2660 2,166 0

10 OR 09-Assoc Rogue Community College Grants Pass 10182 1,842 0

11 SC 09-Assoc Piedmont Technical College Greenwood 3992 1,793 0

12 SC 09-Assoc Sumter Area Technical College Sumter 3995 1,366 0

Page 19: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Honolulu Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Revenues per FTE Student

$1,379

$4,277

$90

$5,746

$996

$6,175

$30

$7,201

$996

$7,007

$30

$8,033

Tuition & Fees

Appropriations

Gifts, Contracts& Endowment

Income

Total Revenue

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000

Peer Group Average

Honolulu CC

Honolulu CC (Including Systemwide Revenues)

Figure B1

Page 20: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Honolulu Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Expenditures per FTE Student

$2,742

$605

$924

$131

$1,114

$540

$153

$4,310

$641

$690

$19

$394

$752

$914

$4,337

$651

$778

$19

$1,112

$771

$914

Instruction

StudentServices

AcademicSupport

Library

InstitutionalSupport

Operations /Maintenance

PublicServices

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000

Peer Group Average

Honolulu CC

Honolulu CC (Including Systemwide Expenditures)

Figure B2

Page 21: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix B1

HONOLULU COMMUNITY COLLEGEPEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENT

FISCAL YEAR 1993-94

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Victor Valley College 3,402 0 288 4,985 9 5,282 2,407 695 423 181 1,497 505 5,529 0 0 983 6,511

2 DE Del Tech Com Col Stanton-Wil 3,445 0 1,840 5,150 0 6,990 782 838 3,245 52 2,316 627 7,808 0 0 337 8,145

3 HI Honolulu Community College 2,724 0 996 6,175 30 7,201 4,310 641 690 19 394 752 6,515 0 914 322 8,023

4 HI Kapi‘olani Community College 4,212 0 1,022 4,111 55 5,188 3,345 458 609 54 379 395 5,025 0 538 175 5,899

5 NC Coastal Carolina Com College 2,357 0 999 4,890 29 5,919 2,900 578 625 167 650 550 5,270 0 107 536 5,945

6 NC Gaston College 2,506 0 836 5,680 231 6,747 3,957 318 169 169 924 605 5,973 0 0 402 6,375

7 OH Stark Technical College 2,561 0 2,432 2,565 182 5,179 2,577 635 367 42 892 476 4,773 0 577 970 6,493

8 PA Lehigh Community College 2,648 0 1,976 2,689 189 4,854 2,678 529 797 229 982 557 5,542 0 0 936 6,479

9 SC Tri-County Technical College 2,107 0 1,635 4,146 28 5,809 3,291 790 1,159 153 1,270 605 7,116 0 0 507 7,623

HIGH Excluding 4,212 0 2,432 5,680 231 6,990 3,957 838 3,245 229 2,316 627 7,808 0 577 983 8,145

AVERAGE HONOLULU CC 2,905 0 1,379 4,277 90 5,746 2,742 605 924 131 1,114 540 5,879 0 153 606 6,684

LOW 2,107 0 288 2,565 0 4,854 782 318 169 42 379 395 4,773 0 0 175 5,899

HONOLULU CC RANK (of 9) 4 NA 7 1 5 1 1 4 4 9 8 1 3 NA 1 8 2

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 22: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix B2HONOLULU COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Percent Distribution

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Victor Valley College 3,402 0 5 94 0 100% 37 11 6 3 23 8 85 0 0 15 100%

2 DE Del Tech Com Col Stanton-Wil 3,445 0 26 74 0 100% 10 10 40 1 28 8 96 0 0 4 100%

3 HI Honolulu Community College 2,724 0 14 86 0 100% 54 8 9 0 5 9 81 0 11 4 100%

4 HI Kapi‘olani Community College 4,212 0 20 79 1 100% 57 8 10 1 6 7 85 0 9 3 100%

5 NC Coastal Carolina Com College 2,357 0 17 83 0 100% 49 10 11 3 11 9 89 0 2 9 100%

6 NC Gaston College 2,506 0 12 84 3 100% 62 5 3 3 14 9 94 0 0 6 100%

7 OH Stark Technical College 2,561 0 47 50 4 100% 40 10 6 1 14 7 74 0 9 15 100%

8 PA Lehigh Community College 2,648 0 41 55 4 100% 41 8 12 4 15 9 86 0 0 14 100%

9 SC Tri-County Technical College 2,107 0 28 71 0 100% 43 10 15 2 17 8 93 0 0 7 100%

HIGH Excluding 4,212 0 47 94 4 100% 62 11 40 4 28 9 96 0 9 15 100%

AVERAGE HONOLULU CC 2,905 0 25 74 2 100% 42 9 13 2 16 8 88 0 3 9 100%

LOW 2,107 0 5 50 0 100% 10 5 3 1 6 7 74 0 0 3 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 23: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix B3HONOLULU COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Victor Valley College 3,402 0 288 4,985 9 5,282 2,407 695 423 181 1,497 505 5,529 0 0 983 6,511

2 DE Del Tech Com Col Stanton-Wil 3,445 0 1,840 5,150 0 6,990 782 838 3,245 52 2,316 627 7,808 0 0 337 8,145

3 HI Honolulu Community College 2,724 0 996 7,007 30 8,033 4,337 651 778 19 1,112 771 7,375 0 914 322 8,885

4 HI Kapi‘olani Community College 4,212 0 1,022 4,665 56 5,743 3,366 466 686 54 1,069 405 5,831 0 538 175 6,705

5 NC Coastal Carolina Com College 2,357 0 999 4,890 29 5,919 2,900 578 625 167 650 550 5,270 0 107 536 5,945

6 NC Gaston College 2,506 0 836 5,680 231 6,747 3,957 318 169 169 924 605 5,973 0 0 402 6,375

7 OH Stark Technical College 2,561 0 2,432 2,565 182 5,179 2,577 635 367 42 892 476 4,773 0 577 970 6,493

8 PA Lehigh Community College 2,648 0 1,976 2,689 189 4,854 2,678 529 797 229 982 557 5,542 0 0 936 6,479

9 SC Tri-County Technical College 2,107 0 1,635 4,146 28 5,809 3,291 790 1,159 153 1,270 605 7,116 0 0 507 7,623

HIGH Excluding 4,212 0 2,432 5,680 231 6,990 3,957 838 3,245 229 2,316 627 7,808 0 577 983 8,145

AVERAGE HONOLULU CC 2,905 0 1,379 4,346 91 5,815 2,745 606 934 131 1,200 541 5,980 0 153 606 6,784

LOW 2,107 0 288 2,565 0 4,854 782 318 169 42 650 405 4,773 0 0 175 5,945

HONOLULU CC RANK (of 9) 4 NA 7 1 5 1 1 4 4 9 4 1 2 NA 1 8 1

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 24: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix B4HONOLULU COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Percent Distribution

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Victor Valley College 3,402 0 5 94 0 100% 37 11 6 3 23 8 85 0 0 15 100%

2 DE Del Tech Com Col Stanton-Wil 3,445 0 26 74 0 100% 10 10 40 1 28 8 96 0 0 4 100%

3 HI Honolulu Community College 2,724 0 12 87 0 100% 49 7 9 0 13 9 83 0 10 4 100%

4 HI Kapi‘olani Community College 4,212 0 18 81 1 100% 50 7 10 1 16 6 87 0 8 3 100%

5 NC Coastal Carolina Com College 2,357 0 17 83 0 100% 49 10 11 3 11 9 89 0 2 9 100%

6 NC Gaston College 2,506 0 12 84 3 100% 62 5 3 3 14 9 94 0 0 6 100%

7 OH Stark Technical College 2,561 0 47 50 4 100% 40 10 6 1 14 7 74 0 9 15 100%

8 PA Lehigh Community College 2,648 0 41 55 4 100% 41 8 12 4 15 9 86 0 0 14 100%

9 SC Tri-County Technical College 2,107 0 28 71 0 100% 43 10 15 2 17 8 93 0 0 7 100%

HIGH Excluding 4,212 0 47 94 4 100% 62 11 40 4 28 9 96 0 9 15 100%

AVERAGE HONOLULU CC 2,905 0 24 74 2 100% 42 9 13 2 17 8 88 0 2 9 100%

LOW 2,107 0 5 50 0 100% 10 5 3 1 11 6 74 0 0 3 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 25: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix B5HONOLULU COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUPFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

CARNEGIE FICE ENROLLMENT

STATE CLASSIFICATION NAME CITY CODE FTE %

ENROLL Grad

1 CA 09-Assoc Victor Valley College Victorville 1335 3,402 0

2 DE 09-Assoc Del Tech Cmty Col Stanton-Wil Newark 11387 3,445 0

3 HI 09-Assoc Honolulu Community College Honolulu 1612 2,724 0

4 HI 09-Assoc Kapi‘olani Community College Honolulu 1613 4,212 0

5 NC 09-Assoc Coastal Carolina Comm College Jacksonville 8084 2,357 0

6 NC 09-Assoc Gaston College Dallas 2973 2,506 0

7 OH 09-Assoc Stark Technical College Canton 10881 2,561 0

8 PA 09-Assoc Lehigh Cty Community College Schnecksville 6810 2,648 0

9 SC 09-Assoc Tri-County Technical College Pendleton 4926 2,107 0

Page 26: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

$1,832

$3,554

$164

$5,549

$1,022

$4,111

$55

$5,188

$1,022

$4,665

$56

$5,743

Tuition & Fees

Appropriations

Gifts, Contracts& Endowment

Income

Total Revenue

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000

Peer Group Average

Kapi‘olani CC

Kapi‘olani CC (Including Systemwide Revenues)

Figure C1

Kapi‘olani Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Revenues per FTE Student

Page 27: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

$3,114

$585

$437

$151

$1,219

$686

$46

$3,345

$458

$609

$54

$379

$395

$538

$3,366

$466

$686

$54

$1,069

$405

$538

Instruction

StudentServices

AcademicSupport

Library

InstitutionalSupport

Operations /Maintenance

PublicServices

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000

Peer Group Average

Kapi‘olani CC

Kapi‘olani CC (Including Systemwide Expenditures)

Figure C2

Kapi‘olani Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Expenditures per FTE Student

Page 28: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix C1KAPI‘OLANI COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CT Manchester Community College 3,514 0 1,938 2,793 34 4,765 2,087 480 930 209 770 392 4,652 0 22 792 5,472

2 FL Pasco Hernando Comm College 3,061 0 1,244 2,962 62 4,267 1,999 648 483 170 920 486 4,535 0 0 1,148 5,683

3 HI Kapi‘olani Community College 4,212 0 1,022 4,111 55 5,188 3,345 458 609 54 379 395 5,025 0 538 175 5,899

4 KS Kansas City Community College 3,238 0 1,019 4,534 26 5,579 3,104 410 457 114 1,332 773 6,072 15 0 844 6,935

5 MA Holyoke Community College 3,471 0 2,248 3,241 1 5,490 3,101 699 441 0 822 803 5,854 0 44 938 6,848

6 NJ Raritan Valley Comm College 3,187 0 1,956 3,944 0 5,901 2,402 627 532 215 1,429 898 5,819 28 202 333 6,452

7 NY Niagara Community College 3,995 0 2,135 3,200 124 5,459 3,596 609 234 208 1,472 610 6,493 0 88 1,420 8,027

8 NY Orange Cty Community College 3,679 0 2,267 4,230 607 7,104 4,264 798 185 182 1,173 1,134 7,534 0 66 901 8,521

9 OR Clackamas Community College 3,979 0 1,532 4,767 0 6,300 2,978 514 372 108 2,786 736 7,376 0 37 582 8,005

10 WA Edmonds Community College 4,478 0 2,108 2,638 700 5,446 4,394 388 330 128 537 473 6,122 0 0 982 7,104

11 WA Tacoma Community College 3,248 0 1,869 3,224 86 5,179 3,210 678 406 181 947 552 5,794 0 0 1,138 6,932

HIGH Excluding 4,478 0 2,267 4,767 700 7,104 4,394 798 930 215 2,786 1,134 7,534 28 202 1,420 8,521

AVERAGE KAPI‘OLANI CC 3,585 0 1,832 3,554 164 5,549 3,114 585 437 151 1,219 686 6,025 4 46 908 6,998

LOW 3,061 0 1,019 2,638 0 4,267 1,999 388 185 0 537 392 4,535 0 0 333 5,472

KAPI‘OLANI CC RANK (of 11) 2 NA 10 4 6 8 4 9 2 10 11 10 9 NA 1 11 9

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 29: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix C2KAPI‘OLANI COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CT Manchester Community College 3,514 0 41 59 1 100% 38 9 17 4 14 7 85 0 0 14 100%

2 FL Pasco Hernando Comm College 3,061 0 29 69 1 100% 35 11 8 3 16 9 80 0 0 20 100%

3 HI Kapi‘olani Community College 4,212 0 20 79 1 100% 57 8 10 1 6 7 85 0 9 3 100%

4 KS Kansas City Community College 3,238 0 18 81 0 100% 45 6 7 2 19 11 88 0 0 12 100%

5 MA Holyoke Community College 3,471 0 41 59 0 100% 45 10 6 0 12 12 85 0 1 14 100%

6 NJ Raritan Valley Comm College 3,187 0 33 67 0 100% 37 10 8 3 22 14 90 0 3 5 100%

7 NY Niagara Community College 3,995 0 39 59 2 100% 45 8 3 3 18 8 81 0 1 18 100%

8 NY Orange Cty Community College 3,679 0 32 60 9 100% 50 9 2 2 14 13 88 0 1 11 100%

9 OR Clackamas Community College 3,979 0 24 76 0 100% 37 6 5 1 35 9 92 0 0 7 100%

10 WA Edmonds Community College 4,478 0 39 48 13 100% 62 5 5 2 8 7 86 0 0 14 100%

11 WA Tacoma Community College 3,248 0 36 62 2 100% 46 10 6 3 14 8 84 0 0 16 100%

HIGH Excluding 4,478 0 41 81 13 100% 62 11 17 4 35 14 92 0 3 20 100%

AVERAGE KAPI‘OLANI CC 3,585 0 33 64 3 100% 44 8 7 2 17 10 86 0 1 13 100%

LOW 3,061 0 18 48 0 100% 35 5 2 0 8 7 80 0 0 5 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 30: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix C3KAPI‘OLANI COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CT Manchester Community College 3,514 0 1,938 2,793 34 4,765 2,087 480 930 209 770 392 4,652 0 22 792 5,472

2 FL Pasco Hernando Comm College 3,061 0 1,244 2,962 62 4,267 1,999 648 483 170 920 486 4,535 0 0 1,148 5,683

3 HI Kapi‘olani Community College 4,212 0 1,022 4,665 56 5,743 3,366 466 686 54 1,069 405 5,831 0 538 175 6,705

4 KS Kansas City Community College 3,238 0 1,019 4,534 26 5,579 3,104 410 457 114 1,332 773 6,072 15 0 844 6,935

5 MA Holyoke Community College 3,471 0 2,248 3,241 1 5,490 3,101 699 441 0 822 803 5,854 0 44 938 6,848

6 NJ Raritan Valley Comm College 3,187 0 1,956 3,944 0 5,901 2,402 627 532 215 1,429 898 5,819 28 202 333 6,452

7 NY Niagara Community College 3,995 0 2,135 3,200 124 5,459 3,596 609 234 208 1,472 610 6,493 0 88 1,420 8,027

8 NY Orange Cty Community College 3,679 0 2,267 4,230 607 7,104 4,264 798 185 182 1,173 1,134 7,534 0 66 901 8,521

9 OR Clackamas Community College 3,979 0 1,532 4,767 0 6,300 2,978 514 372 108 2,786 736 7,376 0 37 582 8,005

10 WA Edmonds Community College 4,478 0 2,108 2,638 700 5,446 4,394 388 330 128 537 473 6,122 0 0 982 7,104

11 WA Tacoma Community College 3,248 0 1,869 3,224 86 5,179 3,210 678 406 181 947 552 5,794 0 0 1,138 6,932

HIGH Excluding 4,478 0 2,267 4,767 700 7,104 4,394 798 930 215 2,786 1,134 7,534 28 202 1,420 8,521

AVERAGE KAPI‘OLANI CC 3,585 0 1,832 3,554 164 5,549 3,114 585 437 151 1,219 686 6,025 4 46 908 6,998

LOW 3,061 0 1,019 2,638 0 4,267 1,999 388 185 0 537 392 4,535 0 0 333 5,472

KAPI‘OLANI CC RANK (of 11) 2 NA 10 2 6 4 4 9 2 10 6 10 7 NA 1 11 8

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 31: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix C4KAPI‘OLANI COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CT Manchester Community College 3,514 0 41 59 1 100% 38 9 17 4 14 7 85 0 0 14 100%

2 FL Pasco Hernando Comm College 3,061 0 29 69 1 100% 35 11 8 3 16 9 80 0 0 20 100%

3 HI Kapi‘olani Community College 4,212 0 18 81 1 100% 50 7 10 1 16 6 87 0 8 3 100%

4 KS Kansas City Community College 3,238 0 18 81 0 100% 45 6 7 2 19 11 88 0 0 12 100%

5 MA Holyoke Community College 3,471 0 41 59 0 100% 45 10 6 0 12 12 85 0 1 14 100%

6 NJ Raritan Valley Comm College 3,187 0 33 67 0 100% 37 10 8 3 22 14 90 0 3 5 100%

7 NY Niagara Community College 3,995 0 39 59 2 100% 45 8 3 3 18 8 81 0 1 18 100%

8 NY Orange Cty Community College 3,679 0 32 60 9 100% 50 9 2 2 14 13 88 0 1 11 100%

9 OR Clackamas Community College 3,979 0 24 76 0 100% 37 6 5 1 35 9 92 0 0 7 100%

10 WA Edmonds Community College 4,478 0 39 48 13 100% 62 5 5 2 8 7 86 0 0 14 100%

11 WA Tacoma Community College 3,248 0 36 62 2 100% 46 10 6 3 14 8 84 0 0 16 100%

HIGH Excluding 4,478 0 41 81 13 100% 62 11 17 4 35 14 92 0 3 20 100%

AVERAGE KAPI‘OLANI CC 3,585 0 33 64 3 100% 44 8 7 2 17 10 86 0 1 13 100%

LOW 3,061 0 18 48 0 100% 35 5 2 0 8 7 80 0 0 5 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 32: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix C5KAPI‘OLANI COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUPFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

CARNEGIE FICE ENROLLMENT

STATE CLASSIFICATION NAME CITY CODE FTE %

ENROLL Grad

1 CT 09-Assoc Manchester Community College Manchester 1392 3,514 0

2 FL 09-Assoc Pasco Hernando Comm College Dade City 10652 3,061 0

3 HI 09-Assoc Kapi‘olani Community College Honolulu 1613 4,212 0

4 KS 09-Assoc Kansas City Community College Kansas City 1925 3,238 0

5 MA 09-Assoc Holyoke Community College Holyoke 2170 3,471 0

6 NJ 09-Assoc Raritan Valley Comm College Somerville 7731 3,187 0

7 NY 09-Assoc Niagara Community College Sanborn 2874 3,995 0

8 NY 09-Assoc Orange Cty Community College Middletown 2876 3,679 0

9 OR 09-Assoc Clackamas Community College Oregon City 4878 3,979 0

10 WA 09-Assoc Edmonds Community College Lynnwood 5001 4,478 0

11 WA 09-Assoc Tacoma Community College Tacoma 3796 3,248 0

Page 33: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Kaua‘i Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Revenues per FTE Student

$1,645

$4,463

$136

$6,243

$924

$9,258

$12

$10,194

$924

$10,507

$12

$11,443

Tuition & Fees

Appropriations

Gifts, Contracts& Endowment

Income

Total Revenue

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000

Peer Group Average

Kaua‘i CC

Kaua‘i CC (Including Systemwide Revenues)

Figure D1

Page 34: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Kaua‘i Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Expenditures per FTE Student

$3,308

$708

$681

$174

$1,106

$686

$177

$4,992

$900

$1,376

$45

$1,185

$1,621

$1,742

$5,023

$914

$1,551

$45

$3,341

$1,661

$1,742

Instruction

StudentServices

AcademicSupport

Library

InstitutionalSupport

Operations /Maintenance

PublicServices

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000

Peer Group Average

Kaua‘i CC

Kaua‘i CC (Including Systemwide Expenditures)

Figure D2

Page 35: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix D1KAUA‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 HI Kaua‘i Community College 849 0 924 9,258 12 10,194 4,992 900 1,376 45 1,185 1,621 9,540 42 1,742 244 12,102

2 IA Southwestern Community College 922 0 2,097 4,297 0 6,394 5,017 709 120 120 1,921 718 8,486 0 0 1,112 9,598

3 IL Shawnee Community College 1,398 0 1,286 2,845 0 4,131 2,335 607 241 111 746 414 4,148 0 649 1,072 6,064

4 IN Ind Voc Tech College-Lafayette 1,043 0 1,723 3,195 211 5,129 2,324 416 549 85 941 589 4,688 0 435 1,195 6,449

5 MI Glen Oaks Community College 789 0 1,545 5,111 109 6,764 3,053 1,419 1,142 123 1,430 886 7,912 0 55 626 8,609

6 MI Kirtland Community College 885 0 1,695 6,653 98 8,445 3,554 1,069 1,317 222 1,056 730 7,645 0 273 1,565 9,566

7 NC Beaufort Community College 760 0 1,029 6,726 101 7,856 4,064 891 1,006 239 1,346 862 8,126 0 145 821 9,136

8 NC Mitchell Community College 990 0 840 6,457 536 7,833 3,653 618 1,032 247 1,244 842 7,379 2 33 475 7,899

9 OH Kent State Univ Tuscaraws Reg 831 0 3,544 2,620 21 6,186 3,391 344 686 191 620 594 5,595 0 137 54 5,827

10 TX Hill College 1,433 0 1,151 2,983 153 4,287 1,853 513 280 122 512 576 3,734 0 2 1,256 4,993

11 VA Dabney S Lancaster Com Col 828 0 1,545 3,738 128 5,410 3,840 495 432 275 1,238 645 6,639 0 37 1,132 7,819

HIGH Excluding 1,433 0 3,544 6,726 536 8,445 5,017 1,419 1,317 275 1,921 886 8,486 2 649 1,565 9,598

AVERAGE KAUA‘I CC 988 0 1,645 4,463 136 6,243 3,308 708 681 174 1,106 686 6,435 0 177 931 7,596

LOW 760 0 840 2,620 0 4,131 1,853 344 120 85 512 414 3,734 0 0 54 4,993

KAUA‘I CC RANK (of 11) 7 NA 10 1 9 1 2 3 1 11 6 1 1 1 1 10 1

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 36: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix D2KAUA‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 HI Kaua‘i Community College 849 0 9 91 0 100% 41 7 11 0 10 13 79 0 14 2 100%

2 IA Southwestern Community College 922 0 33 67 0 100% 52 7 1 1 20 7 88 0 0 12 100%

3 IL Shawnee Community College 1,398 0 31 69 0 100% 39 10 4 2 12 7 68 0 11 18 100%

4 IN Ind Voc Tech College-Lafayette 1,043 0 34 62 4 100% 36 6 9 1 15 9 73 0 7 19 100%

5 MI Glen Oaks Community College 789 0 23 76 2 100% 35 16 13 1 17 10 92 0 1 7 100%

6 MI Kirtland Community College 885 0 20 79 1 100% 37 11 14 2 11 8 80 0 3 16 100%

7 NC Beaufort Community College 760 0 13 86 1 100% 44 10 11 3 15 9 89 0 2 9 100%

8 NC Mitchell Community College 990 0 11 82 7 100% 46 8 13 3 16 11 93 0 0 6 100%

9 OH Kent State Univ Tuscaraws Reg 831 0 57 42 0 100% 58 6 12 3 11 10 96 0 2 1 100%

10 TX Hill College 1,433 0 27 70 4 100% 37 10 6 2 10 12 75 0 0 25 100%

11 VA Dabney S Lancaster Com Col 828 0 29 69 2 100% 49 6 6 4 16 8 85 0 0 14 100%

HIGH Excluding 1,433 0 57 86 7 100% 58 16 14 4 20 12 96 0 11 25 100%

AVERAGE KAUA‘I CC 988 0 28 70 2 100% 43 9 9 2 14 9 84 0 3 13 100%

LOW 760 0 11 42 0 100% 35 6 1 1 10 7 68 0 0 1 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 37: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix D3KAUA‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 HI Kaua‘i Community College 849 0 924 10,507 12 11,443 5,023 914 1,551 45 3,341 1,661 11,955 42 1,742 244 14,518

2 IA Southwestern Community College 922 0 2,097 4,297 0 6,394 5,017 709 120 120 1,921 718 8,486 0 0 1,112 9,598

3 IL Shawnee Community College 1,398 0 1,286 2,845 0 4,131 2,335 607 241 111 746 414 4,148 0 649 1,072 6,064

4 IN Ind Voc Tech College-Lafayette 1,043 0 1,723 3,195 211 5,129 2,324 416 549 85 941 589 4,688 0 435 1,195 6,449

5 MI Glen Oaks Community College 789 0 1,545 5,111 109 6,764 3,053 1,419 1,142 123 1,430 886 7,912 0 55 626 8,609

6 MI Kirtland Community College 885 0 1,695 6,653 98 8,445 3,554 1,069 1,317 222 1,056 730 7,645 0 273 1,565 9,566

7 NC Beaufort Community College 760 0 1,029 6,726 101 7,856 4,064 891 1,006 239 1,346 862 8,126 0 145 821 9,136

8 NC Mitchell Community College 990 0 840 6,457 536 7,833 3,653 618 1,032 247 1,244 842 7,379 2 33 475 7,899

9 OH Kent State Univ Tuscaraws Reg 831 0 3,544 2,620 21 6,186 3,391 344 686 191 620 594 5,595 0 137 54 5,827

10 TX Hill College 1,433 0 1,151 2,983 153 4,287 1,853 513 280 122 512 576 3,734 0 2 1,256 4,993

11 VA Dabney S Lancaster Com Col 828 0 1,545 3,738 128 5,410 3,840 495 432 275 1,238 645 6,639 0 37 1,132 7,819

HIGH Excluding 1,433 0 3,544 6,726 536 8,445 5,017 1,419 1,317 275 1,921 886 8,486 2 649 1,565 9,598

AVERAGE KAUA‘I CC 988 0 1,645 4,463 136 6,243 3,308 708 681 174 1,106 686 6,435 0 177 931 7,596

LOW 760 0 840 2,620 0 4,131 1,853 344 120 85 512 414 3,734 0 0 54 4,993

KAUA‘I CC RANK (of 11) 7 NA 10 1 9 1 1 3 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 10 1

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 38: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix D4KAUA‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 HI Kaua‘i Community College 849 0 8 92 0 100% 35 6 11 0 23 11 82 0 12 2 100%

2 IA Southwestern Community College 922 0 33 67 0 100% 52 7 1 1 20 7 88 0 0 12 100%

3 IL Shawnee Community College 1,398 0 31 69 0 100% 39 10 4 2 12 7 68 0 11 18 100%

4 IN Ind Voc Tech College-Lafayette 1,043 0 34 62 4 100% 36 6 9 1 15 9 73 0 7 19 100%

5 MI Glen Oaks Community College 789 0 23 76 2 100% 35 16 13 1 17 10 92 0 1 7 100%

6 MI Kirtland Community College 885 0 20 79 1 100% 37 11 14 2 11 8 80 0 3 16 100%

7 NC Beaufort Community College 760 0 13 86 1 100% 44 10 11 3 15 9 89 0 2 9 100%

8 NC Mitchell Community College 990 0 11 82 7 100% 46 8 13 3 16 11 93 0 0 6 100%

9 OH Kent State Univ Tuscaraws Reg 831 0 57 42 0 100% 58 6 12 3 11 10 96 0 2 1 100%

10 TX Hill College 1,433 0 27 70 4 100% 37 10 6 2 10 12 75 0 0 25 100%

11 VA Dabney S Lancaster Com Col 828 0 29 69 2 100% 49 6 6 4 16 8 85 0 0 14 100%

HIGH Excluding 1,433 0 57 86 7 100% 58 16 14 4 20 12 96 0 11 25 100%

AVERAGE KAUA‘I CC 988 0 28 70 2 100% 43 9 9 2 14 9 84 0 3 13 100%

LOW 760 0 11 42 0 100% 35 6 1 1 10 7 68 0 0 1 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 39: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix D5KAUA‘I COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUPFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

CARNEGIE FICE ENROLLMENT

STATE CLASSIFICATION NAME CITY CODE FTE %

ENROLL Grad

1 HI 09-Assoc Kaua‘i Community College Lihue 1614 849 0

2 IA 09-Assoc Southwestern Community College Creston 1857 922 0

3 IL 09-Assoc Shawnee Community College Ullin 7693 1,398 0

4 IN 09-Assoc Ind Voc Tech College-Lafayette Lafayette 10039 1,043 0

5 MI 09-Assoc Glen Oaks Community College Centreville 2263 789 0

6 MI 09-Assoc Kirtland Community College Roscommon 7171 885 0

7 NC 09-Assoc Beaufort Community College Washington 8558 760 0

8 NC 09-Assoc Mitchell Community College Statesville 2947 990 0

9 OH 09-Assoc Kent State Univ Tuscaraws Reg New Phila 3062 831 0

10 TX 09-Assoc Hill College Hillsboro 3573 1,433 0

11 VA 09-Assoc Dabney S Lancaster Com Col Clifton Forge 4996 828 0

Page 40: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Leeward Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Revenues per FTE Student

$1,421

$3,279

$130

$4,830

$730

$4,128

$39

$4,897

$730

$4,685

$39

$5,454

Tuition & Fees

Appropriations

Gifts, Contracts& Endowment

Income

Total Revenue

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000

Peer Group Average

Leeward CC

Leeward CC (Including Systemwide Revenues)

Figure E1

Page 41: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Leeward Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Expenditures per FTE Student

$2,791

$586

$371

$123

$865

$512

$185

$2,776

$535

$501

$16

$401

$557

$418

$2,793

$544

$564

$16

$1,131

$570

$418

Instruction

StudentServices

AcademicSupport

Library

InstitutionalSupport

Operations /Maintenance

PublicServices

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000

Peer Group Average

Leeward CC

Leeward CC (Including Systemwide Expenditures)

Figure E2

Page 42: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix E1LEEWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AZ Cochise College 2,655 0 1,369 4,611 2 5,982 3,159 722 192 140 1,145 722 5,930 0 33 1,157 7,130

2 CA Hartnell College 3,476 0 555 4,401 0 4,956 2,257 637 401 104 1,126 558 4,868 0 371 771 6,120

3 FL Gulf Coast Community College 3,395 0 1,205 2,953 67 4,226 2,531 712 482 224 570 478 4,742 0 101 550 5,423

4 HI Leeward Community College 4,036 0 730 4,128 39 4,897 2,776 535 501 16 401 557 4,646 0 418 199 5,387

5 IL Black Hawk College Quad-City 4,259 0 1,959 2,770 0 4,729 2,526 535 604 92 1,276 534 5,295 0 601 879 6,955

6 IL South Suburban College 4,627 0 1,364 3,009 0 4,373 1,984 804 93 92 1,316 399 4,432 0 546 532 5,673

7 WA Columbia Basin College 3,658 0 1,138 3,012 109 4,258 2,633 504 232 165 616 475 4,461 0 0 810 5,271

8 WA Edmonds Community College 4,478 0 2,108 2,638 700 5,446 4,394 388 330 128 537 473 6,122 0 0 982 7,104

9 WA Green River Community College 4,431 0 1,615 3,162 247 5,024 2,970 547 722 7 649 463 5,351 0 0 571 5,923

10 WA Highline Community College 4,776 0 1,476 2,952 46 4,474 2,662 427 279 157 550 505 4,418 0 16 816 5,255

HIGH Excluding 4,776 0 2,108 4,611 700 5,982 4,394 804 722 224 1,316 722 6,122 0 601 1,157 7,130

AVERAGE LEEWARD CC 3,973 0 1,421 3,279 130 4,830 2,791 586 371 123 865 512 5,069 0 185 785 6,095

LOW 2,655 0 555 2,638 0 4,226 1,984 388 93 7 537 399 4,418 0 0 532 5,255

LEEWARD CC RANK (of 10) 6 NA 9 3 6 5 4 6 3 9 10 3 7 NA 3 10 8

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Note: Data unavailable for Mira Costa College and Longview Community College.

Page 43: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix E2LEEWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AZ Cochise College 2,655 0 23 77 0 100% 44 10 3 2 16 10 83 0 0 16 100%

2 CA Hartnell College 3,476 0 11 89 0 100% 37 10 7 2 18 9 80 0 6 13 100%

3 FL Gulf Coast Community College 3,395 0 29 70 2 100% 47 13 9 4 11 9 87 0 2 10 100%

4 HI Leeward Community College 4,036 0 15 84 1 100% 52 10 9 0 7 10 86 0 8 4 100%

5 IL Black Hawk College Quad-City 4,259 0 41 59 0 100% 36 8 9 1 18 8 76 0 9 13 100%

6 IL South Suburban College 4,627 0 31 69 0 100% 35 14 2 2 23 7 78 0 10 9 100%

7 WA Columbia Basin College 3,658 0 27 71 3 100% 50 10 4 3 12 9 85 0 0 15 100%

8 WA Edmonds Community College 4,478 0 39 48 13 100% 62 5 5 2 8 7 86 0 0 14 100%

9 WA Green River Community College 4,431 0 32 63 5 100% 50 9 12 0 11 8 90 0 0 10 100%

10 WA Highline Community College 4,776 0 33 66 1 100% 51 8 5 3 10 10 84 0 0 16 100%

HIGH Excluding 4,776 0 41 89 13 100% 62 14 12 4 23 10 90 0 10 16 100%

AVERAGE LEEWARD CC 3,973 0 30 68 3 100% 46 10 6 2 14 9 83 0 3 13 100%

LOW 2,655 0 11 48 0 100% 35 5 2 0 8 7 76 0 0 9 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Note: Data unavailable for Mira Costa College and Longview Community College.

Page 44: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix E3LEEWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AZ Cochise College 2,655 0 1,369 4,611 2 5,982 3,159 722 192 140 1,145 722 5,930 0 33 1,157 7,130

2 CA Hartnell College 3,476 0 555 4,401 0 4,956 2,257 637 401 104 1,126 558 4,868 0 371 771 6,120

3 FL Gulf Coast Community College 3,395 0 1,205 2,953 67 4,226 2,531 712 482 224 570 478 4,742 0 101 550 5,423

4 HI Leeward Community College 4,036 0 730 4,685 39 5,454 2,793 544 564 16 1,131 570 5,477 0 418 199 6,219

5 IL Black Hawk College Quad-City 4,259 0 1,959 2,770 0 4,729 2,526 535 604 92 1,276 534 5,295 0 601 879 6,955

6 IL South Suburban College 4,627 0 1,364 3,009 0 4,373 1,984 804 93 92 1,316 399 4,432 0 546 532 5,673

7 WA Columbia Basin College 3,658 0 1,138 3,012 109 4,258 2,633 504 232 165 616 475 4,461 0 0 810 5,271

8 WA Edmonds Community College 4,478 0 2,108 2,638 700 5,446 4,394 388 330 128 537 473 6,122 0 0 982 7,104

9 WA Green River Community College 4,431 0 1,615 3,162 247 5,024 2,970 547 722 7 649 463 5,351 0 0 571 5,923

10 WA Highline Community College 4,776 0 1,476 2,952 46 4,474 2,662 427 279 157 550 505 4,418 0 16 816 5,255

HIGH Excluding 4,776 0 2,108 4,611 700 5,982 4,394 804 722 224 1,316 722 6,122 0 601 1,157 7,130

AVERAGE LEEWARD CC 3,973 0 1,421 3,279 130 4,830 2,791 586 371 123 865 512 5,069 0 185 785 6,095

LOW 2,655 0 555 2,638 0 4,226 1,984 388 93 7 537 399 4,418 0 0 532 5,255

LEEWARD CC RANK (of 10) 6 NA 9 1 6 2 4 6 3 9 4 2 3 NA 3 10 4

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Note: Data unavailable for Mira Costa College and Longview Community College.

Page 45: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix E4LEEWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AZ Cochise College 2,655 0 23 77 0 100% 44 10 3 2 16 10 83 0 0 16 100%

2 CA Hartnell College 3,476 0 11 89 0 100% 37 10 7 2 18 9 80 0 6 13 100%

3 FL Gulf Coast Community College 3,395 0 29 70 2 100% 47 13 9 4 11 9 87 0 2 10 100%

4 HI Leeward Community College 4,036 0 13 86 1 100% 45 9 9 0 18 9 88 0 7 3 100%

5 IL Black Hawk College Quad-City 4,259 0 41 59 0 100% 36 8 9 1 18 8 76 0 9 13 100%

6 IL South Suburban College 4,627 0 31 69 0 100% 35 14 2 2 23 7 78 0 10 9 100%

7 WA Columbia Basin College 3,658 0 27 71 3 100% 50 10 4 3 12 9 85 0 0 15 100%

8 WA Edmonds Community College 4,478 0 39 48 13 100% 62 5 5 2 8 7 86 0 0 14 100%

9 WA Green River Community College 4,431 0 32 63 5 100% 50 9 12 0 11 8 90 0 0 10 100%

10 WA Highline Community College 4,776 0 33 66 1 100% 51 8 5 3 10 10 84 0 0 16 100%

HIGH Excluding 4,776 0 41 89 13 100% 62 14 12 4 23 10 90 0 10 16 100%

AVERAGE LEEWARD CC 3,973 0 30 68 3 100% 46 10 6 2 14 9 83 0 3 13 100%

LOW 2,655 0 11 48 0 100% 35 5 2 0 8 7 76 0 0 9 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Note: Data unavailable for Mira Costa College and Longview Community College.

Page 46: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix E5LEEWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUPFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

FICE ENROLLMENT

STATE NAME CITY CODE FTE %ENROLL Grad

1 AZ Cochise College Douglas 1072 2,655 0

2 CA Hartnell College Salinas 1209 3,476 0

3 CA Mira Costa College Oceanside 1239 4,491

4 FL Gulf Coast Community College Panama City 1490 3,395 0

5 HI Leeward Community College Pearl City 4549 4,036 0

6 IL Black Hawk College Quad-City Moline 1638 4,259 0

7 IL South Suburban College South Holland 1769 4,627 0

8 MO Longview Community College Lee's Summit 9140 4,924

9 WA Columbia Basin College Pasco 3774 3,658 0

10 WA Edmonds Community College Lynnwood 5001 4,478 0

11 WA Green River Community College Auburn 3780 4,431 0

12 WA Highline Community College Des Moines 3781 4,776 0

Note: Revenue and expenditure data were not available for Mira Costa College, Oceanside, CA,

or Longview Community College, Lee's Summit, MO, for fiscal year 1993-94.

Therefore, these institutions are not listed in the benchmark or peer group comparison tables.

Page 47: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Maui Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Revenues per FTE Student

$1,271

$4,053

$23

$5,347

$920

$6,630

$48

$7,598

$920

$7,524

$49

$8,493

Tuition & Fees

Appropriations

Gifts, Contracts& Endowment

Income

Total Revenue

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000

Peer Group Average

Maui CC

Maui CC (Including Systemwide Revenues)

Figure F1

Page 48: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Maui Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Expenditures per FTE Student

$2,707

$824

$595

$143

$1,013

$737

$155

$4,545

$960

$1,039

$55

$510

$1,002

$663

$4,573

$975

$1,171

$55

$1,437

$1,027

$663

Instruction

StudentServices

AcademicSupport

Library

InstitutionalSupport

Operations /Maintenance

PublicServices

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000

Peer Group Average

Maui CC

Maui CC (Including Systemwide Expenditures)

Figure F2

Page 49: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix F1MAUI COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Porterville College 1,473 0 361 4,734 31 5,127 2,947 581 446 89 850 561 5,380 0 18 830 6,233

2 FL South Florida Community College 1,421 0 1,279 5,625 30 6,934 3,414 2,154 1,096 283 1,506 1,345 9,514 0 2 960 10,478

3 HI Maui Community College 1,450 0 920 6,630 48 7,598 4,545 960 1,039 55 510 1,002 7,857 0 663 299 9,018

4 KS Garden City Community College 1,289 0 991 5,450 0 6,441 2,823 2,108 436 88 1,449 1,267 7,916 0 557 664 9,305

5 NC W Piedmont Community College 1,444 0 696 6,231 27 6,954 3,323 386 728 236 1,090 534 6,046 0 51 515 6,627

6 NJ Cumberland County College 1,796 0 2,212 2,569 34 4,815 2,443 654 497 124 900 542 5,037 0 0 1,256 6,293

7 NM New Mexico Junior College 1,694 0 691 3,898 31 4,621 1,990 1,109 430 203 833 650 4,990 22 55 924 6,014

8 NY North Country Com College 1,155 0 2,578 3,269 0 5,847 3,070 704 1,330 131 1,063 592 6,692 0 226 2,415 9,401

9 OR Treasure Valley Com College 1,203 0 1,389 4,815 11 6,216 3,458 495 587 109 900 1,187 6,426 0 671 852 8,150

10 TX Cisco Junior College 1,693 0 1,029 2,692 32 3,752 1,639 321 154 82 985 724 3,820 0 6 933 4,762

11 VA Germanna Community College 1,312 0 1,446 2,408 71 3,924 2,086 331 412 125 863 318 3,981 0 96 435 4,540

12 WV West Virginia North Com Col 1,680 0 1,509 2,598 5 4,113 1,942 526 586 68 938 424 4,391 0 84 1,068 5,568

13 WY Sheridan College 1,490 0 1,072 4,347 0 5,419 3,344 512 440 176 774 704 5,747 0 93 910 6,777

HIGH Excluding 1,796 0 2,578 6,231 71 6,954 3,458 2,154 1,330 283 1,506 1,345 9,514 22 671 2,415 10,478

AVERAGE MAUI CC 1,471 0 1,271 4,053 23 5,347 2,707 824 595 143 1,013 737 5,828 2 155 980 7,012

LOW 1,155 0 361 2,408 0 3,752 1,639 321 154 68 774 318 3,820 0 0 435 4,540

MAUI CC RANK (of 13) 7 NA 10 1 2 1 1 4 3 13 13 4 3 NA 2 13 4

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 50: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix F2MAUI COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Porterville College 1,473 0 7 92 1 100% 47 9 7 1 14 9 86 0 0 13 100%

2 FL South Florida Community College 1,421 0 18 81 0 100% 33 21 10 3 14 13 91 0 0 9 100%

3 HI Maui Community College 1,450 0 12 87 1 100% 50 11 12 1 6 11 87 0 7 3 100%

4 KS Garden City Community College 1,289 0 15 85 0 100% 30 23 5 1 16 14 85 0 6 7 100%

5 NC W Piedmont Community College 1,444 0 10 90 0 100% 50 6 11 4 16 8 91 0 1 8 100%

6 NJ Cumberland County College 1,796 0 46 53 1 100% 39 10 8 2 14 9 80 0 0 20 100%

7 NM New Mexico Junior College 1,694 0 15 84 1 100% 33 18 7 3 14 11 83 0 1 15 100%

8 NY North Country Com College 1,155 0 44 56 0 100% 33 7 14 1 11 6 71 0 2 26 100%

9 OR Treasure Valley Com College 1,203 0 22 77 0 100% 42 6 7 1 11 15 79 0 8 10 100%

10 TX Cisco Junior College 1,693 0 27 72 1 100% 34 7 3 2 21 15 80 0 0 20 100%

11 VA Germanna Community College 1,312 0 37 61 2 100% 46 7 9 3 19 7 88 0 2 10 100%

12 WV West Virginia North Com Col 1,680 0 37 63 0 100% 35 9 11 1 17 8 79 0 2 19 100%

13 WY Sheridan College 1,490 0 20 80 0 100% 49 8 6 3 11 10 85 0 1 13 100%

HIGH Excluding 1,796 0 46 92 2 100% 50 23 14 4 21 15 91 0 8 26 100%

AVERAGE MAUI CC 1,471 0 25 75 1 100% 39 11 8 2 15 10 83 0 2 14 100%

LOW 1,155 0 7 53 0 100% 30 6 3 1 11 6 71 0 0 7 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 51: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix F3MAUI COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Porterville College 1,473 0 361 4,734 31 5,127 2,947 581 446 89 850 561 5,380 0 18 830 6,233

2 FL South Florida Community College 1,421 0 1,279 5,625 30 6,934 3,414 2,154 1,096 283 1,506 1,345 9,514 0 2 960 10,478

3 HI Maui Community College 1,450 0 920 7,524 49 8,493 4,573 975 1,171 55 1,437 1,027 8,984 0 663 299 10,145

4 KS Garden City Community College 1,289 0 991 5,450 0 6,441 2,823 2,108 436 88 1,449 1,267 7,916 0 557 664 9,305

5 NC W Piedmont Community College 1,444 0 696 6,231 27 6,954 3,323 386 728 236 1,090 534 6,046 0 51 515 6,627

6 NJ Cumberland County College 1,796 0 2,212 2,569 34 4,815 2,443 654 497 124 900 542 5,037 0 0 1,256 6,293

7 NM New Mexico Junior College 1,694 0 691 3,898 31 4,621 1,990 1,109 430 203 833 650 4,990 22 55 924 6,014

8 NY North Country Com College 1,155 0 2,578 3,269 0 5,847 3,070 704 1,330 131 1,063 592 6,692 0 226 2,415 9,401

9 OR Treasure Valley Com College 1,203 0 1,389 4,815 11 6,216 3,458 495 587 109 900 1,187 6,426 0 671 852 8,150

10 TX Cisco Junior College 1,693 0 1,029 2,692 32 3,752 1,639 321 154 82 985 724 3,820 0 6 933 4,762

11 VA Germanna Community College 1,312 0 1,446 2,408 71 3,924 2,086 331 412 125 863 318 3,981 0 96 435 4,540

12 WV West Virginia North Com Col 1,680 0 1,509 2,598 5 4,113 1,942 526 586 68 938 424 4,391 0 84 1,068 5,568

13 WY Sheridan College 1,490 0 1,072 4,347 0 5,419 3,344 512 440 176 774 704 5,747 0 93 910 6,777

HIGH Excluding 1,796 0 2,578 6,231 71 6,954 3,458 2,154 1,330 283 1,506 1,345 9,514 22 671 2,415 10,478

AVERAGE MAUI CC 1,471 0 1,271 4,053 23 5,347 2,707 824 595 143 1,013 737 5,828 2 155 980 7,012

LOW 1,155 0 361 2,408 0 3,752 1,639 321 154 68 774 318 3,820 0 0 435 4,540

MAUI CC RANK (of 13) 7 NA 10 1 2 1 1 4 2 13 3 4 2 NA 2 13 2

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 52: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix F4MAUI COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 CA Porterville College 1,473 0 7 92 1 100% 47 9 7 1 14 9 86 0 0 13 100%

2 FL South Florida Community College 1,421 0 18 81 0 100% 33 21 10 3 14 13 91 0 0 9 100%

3 HI Maui Community College 1,450 0 11 89 1 100% 45 10 12 1 14 10 89 0 7 3 100%

4 KS Garden City Community College 1,289 0 15 85 0 100% 30 23 5 1 16 14 85 0 6 7 100%

5 NC W Piedmont Community College 1,444 0 10 90 0 100% 50 6 11 4 16 8 91 0 1 8 100%

6 NJ Cumberland County College 1,796 0 46 53 1 100% 39 10 8 2 14 9 80 0 0 20 100%

7 NM New Mexico Junior College 1,694 0 15 84 1 100% 33 18 7 3 14 11 83 0 1 15 100%

8 NY North Country Com College 1,155 0 44 56 0 100% 33 7 14 1 11 6 71 0 2 26 100%

9 OR Treasure Valley Com College 1,203 0 22 77 0 100% 42 6 7 1 11 15 79 0 8 10 100%

10 TX Cisco Junior College 1,693 0 27 72 1 100% 34 7 3 2 21 15 80 0 0 20 100%

11 VA Germanna Community College 1,312 0 37 61 2 100% 46 7 9 3 19 7 88 0 2 10 100%

12 WV West Virginia North Com Col 1,680 0 37 63 0 100% 35 9 11 1 17 8 79 0 2 19 100%

13 WY Sheridan College 1,490 0 20 80 0 100% 49 8 6 3 11 10 85 0 1 13 100%

HIGH Excluding 1,796 0 46 92 2 100% 50 23 14 4 21 15 91 0 8 26 100%

AVERAGE MAUI CC 1,471 0 25 75 1 100% 39 11 8 2 15 10 83 0 2 14 100%

LOW 1,155 0 7 53 0 100% 30 6 3 1 11 6 71 0 0 7 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 53: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix F5MAUI COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUPFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

CARNEGIE FICE ENROLLMENT

STATE CLASSIFICATION NAME CITY CODE FTE %

ENROLL Grad

1 CA 09-Assoc Porterville College Porterville 1268 1,473 0

2 FL 09-Assoc South Florida Community College Avon Park 1522 1,421 0

3 HI 09-Assoc Maui Community College Kahului 1615 1,450 0

4 KS 09-Assoc Garden City Community College Garden City 1919 1,289 0

5 NC 09-Assoc W Piedmont Community College Morganton 2982 1,444 0

6 NJ 09-Assoc Cumberland County College Vineland 2601 1,796 0

7 NM 09-Assoc New Mexico Junior College Hobbs 2655 1,694 0

8 NY 09-Assoc North Country Com College Saranac Lake 7111 1,155 0

9 OR 09-Assoc Treasure Valley Com College Ontario 3221 1,203 0

10 TX 09-Assoc Cisco Junior College Cisco 3553 1,693 0

11 VA 09-Assoc Germanna Community College Locust Grove 8660 1,312 0

12 WV 09-Assoc West Virginia North Com Col Wheeling 9054 1,680 0

13 WY 09-Assoc Sheridan College Sheridan 3930 1,490 0

Page 54: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Windward Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Revenues per FTE Student

$1,780

$3,641

$33

$5,454

$826

$5,758

$0

$6,584

$826

$6,534

$0

$7,360

Tuition & Fees

Appropriations

Gifts, Contracts& Endowment

Income

Total Revenue

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000

Peer Group Average

Windward CC

Windward CC (Including Systemwide Revenues)

Figure G1

Page 55: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

University of Hawai‘i

Windward Community College Peer ComparisonsFiscal 1993-94: Expenditures per FTE Student

$2,695

$649

$631

$212

$995

$664

$112

$3,297

$1,058

$918

$44

$771

$492

$397

$3,317

$1,074

$1,035

$44

$2,175

$505

$397

Instruction

StudentServices

AcademicSupport

Library

InstitutionalSupport

Operations /Maintenance

PublicServices

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000

Peer Group Average

Windward CC

Wimdward CC (Including Systemwide Expenditures)

Figure G2

Page 56: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix G1WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AL Lurleen B Wallace State Jr College 947 0 1,274 2,806 0 4,079 2,013 706 542 122 677 416 4,341 40 0 1,260 5,653

2 AZ South Mountain Com College 1,567 0 1,321 4,535 97 5,953 2,220 584 1,052 236 910 699 5,430 0 116 1,078 6,659

3 CA College of the Siskiyous 1,252 0 529 5,861 169 6,559 3,484 892 780 205 1,389 598 7,124 0 66 737 7,947

4 GA Atlanta Metropolitan College 1,235 0 1,806 3,935 0 5,741 3,061 717 549 218 1,036 847 6,138 0 237 1,195 7,641

5 GA Middle Georgia College 1,384 0 1,488 4,951 18 6,458 2,894 628 767 236 1,348 1,130 6,758 0 34 1,047 7,849

6 HI Windward Community College 969 0 826 5,758 0 6,584 3,297 1,058 918 44 771 492 6,417 0 397 301 7,234

7 MN Mesabi Community College 765 0 1,863 3,278 0 5,141 2,452 756 714 211 1,412 535 5,844 0 81 1,526 7,475

8 OH Kent State University Stark 1,618 0 3,441 2,099 0 5,539 3,167 472 390 212 568 612 5,166 0 144 103 5,456

9 SC Univ South Carolina, Sumter 1,009 0 2,091 3,297 0 5,387 2,943 645 920 308 736 573 5,685 0 439 719 6,975

10 VA R Bland Col William and Mary 921 0 2,013 2,712 12 4,736 2,084 480 244 201 1,119 772 4,700 0 0 495 5,195

11 WA Whatcom Community College 1,742 0 1,972 2,939 31 4,942 2,631 613 355 166 755 463 4,818 0 0 1,039 5,857

HIGH Excluding 1,742 0 3,441 5,861 169 6,559 3,484 892 1,052 308 1,412 1,130 7,124 40 439 1,526 7,947

AVERAGE WINDWARD CC 1,244 0 1,780 3,641 33 5,454 2,695 649 631 212 995 664 5,600 4 112 920 6,671

LOW 765 0 529 2,099 0 4,079 2,013 472 244 122 568 416 4,341 0 0 103 5,195

WINDWARD CC RANK (of 11) 8 NA 10 2 6 1 2 1 3 11 7 9 3 NA 2 10 5

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 57: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix G2WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AL Lurleen B Wallace State Jr College 947 0 31 69 0 100% 36 12 10 2 12 7 77 1 0 22 100%

2 AZ South Mountain Com College 1,567 0 22 76 2 100% 33 9 16 4 14 10 82 0 2 16 100%

3 CA College of the Siskiyous 1,252 0 8 89 3 100% 44 11 10 3 17 8 90 0 1 9 100%

4 GA Atlanta Metropolitan College 1,235 0 31 69 0 100% 40 9 7 3 14 11 80 0 3 16 100%

5 GA Middle Georgia College 1,384 0 23 77 0 100% 37 8 10 3 17 14 86 0 0 13 100%

6 HI Windward Community College 969 0 13 87 0 100% 46 15 13 1 11 7 89 0 5 4 100%

7 MN Mesabi Community College 765 0 36 64 0 100% 33 10 10 3 19 7 78 0 1 20 100%

8 OH Kent State University Stark 1,618 0 62 38 0 100% 58 9 7 4 10 11 95 0 3 2 100%

9 SC Univ South Carolina, Sumter 1,009 0 39 61 0 100% 42 9 13 4 11 8 82 0 6 10 100%

10 VA R Bland Col William and Mary 921 0 43 57 0 100% 40 9 5 4 22 15 90 0 0 10 100%

11 WA Whatcom Community College 1,742 0 40 59 1 100% 45 10 6 3 13 8 82 0 0 18 100%

HIGH Excluding 1,742 0 62 89 3 100% 58 12 16 4 22 15 95 1 6 22 100%

AVERAGE WINDWARD CC 1,244 0 34 66 1 100% 41 10 9 3 15 10 84 0 2 14 100%

LOW 765 0 8 38 0 100% 33 8 5 2 10 7 77 0 0 2 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 58: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix G3WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AL Lurleen B Wallace State Jr College 947 0 1,274 2,806 0 4,079 2,013 706 542 122 677 416 4,341 40 0 1,260 5,653

2 AZ South Mountain Com College 1,567 0 1,321 4,535 97 5,953 2,220 584 1,052 236 910 699 5,430 0 116 1,078 6,659

3 CA College of the Siskiyous 1,252 0 529 5,861 169 6,559 3,484 892 780 205 1,389 598 7,124 0 66 737 7,947

4 GA Atlanta Metropolitan College 1,235 0 1,806 3,935 0 5,741 3,061 717 549 218 1,036 847 6,138 0 237 1,195 7,641

5 GA Middle Georgia College 1,384 0 1,488 4,951 18 6,458 2,894 628 767 236 1,348 1,130 6,758 0 34 1,047 7,849

6 HI Windward Community College 969 0 826 6,534 0 7,360 3,317 1,074 1,035 44 2,175 505 7,987 0 397 301 8,804

7 MN Mesabi Community College 765 0 1,863 3,278 0 5,141 2,452 756 714 211 1,412 535 5,844 0 81 1,526 7,475

8 OH Kent State University Stark 1,618 0 3,441 2,099 0 5,539 3,167 472 390 212 568 612 5,166 0 144 103 5,456

9 SC Univ South Carolina, Sumter 1,009 0 2,091 3,297 0 5,387 2,943 645 920 308 736 573 5,685 0 439 719 6,975

10 VA R Bland Col William and Mary 921 0 2,013 2,712 12 4,736 2,084 480 244 201 1,119 772 4,700 0 0 495 5,195

11 WA Whatcom Community College 1,742 0 1,972 2,939 31 4,942 2,631 613 355 166 755 463 4,818 0 0 1,039 5,857

HIGH Excluding 1,742 0 3,441 5,861 169 6,559 3,484 892 1,052 308 1,412 1,130 7,124 40 439 1,526 7,947

AVERAGE WINDWARD CC 1,244 0 1,780 3,641 33 5,454 2,695 649 631 212 995 664 5,600 4 112 920 6,671

LOW 765 0 529 2,099 0 4,079 2,013 472 244 122 568 416 4,341 0 0 103 5,195

WINDWARD CC RANK (of 11) 8 NA 10 1 6 1 2 1 2 11 1 9 1 NA 2 10 1

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 59: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix G4WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUP COMPARISONS, PER FTE STUDENTFISCAL YEAR 1993-94Percent Distribution

Includes Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures

ENROLLMENT REVENUES PER FTE STUDENT EXPENDITURES PER FTE STUDENT

ST NAME FTE % TOTAL FULL FUND TOTALENROLL Grad Tuition 1/ Approp GC/E REV 1/ Instr SS AS 2/ Lib 2/ IS O/M INSTR RES PS SA EXP

1 AL Lurleen B Wallace State Jr College 947 0 31 69 0 100% 36 12 10 2 12 7 77 1 0 22 100%

2 AZ South Mountain Com College 1,567 0 22 76 2 100% 33 9 16 4 14 10 82 0 2 16 100%

3 CA College of the Siskiyous 1,252 0 8 89 3 100% 44 11 10 3 17 8 90 0 1 9 100%

4 GA Atlanta Metropolitan College 1,235 0 31 69 0 100% 40 9 7 3 14 11 80 0 3 16 100%

5 GA Middle Georgia College 1,384 0 23 77 0 100% 37 8 10 3 17 14 86 0 0 13 100%

6 HI Windward Community College 969 0 11 89 0 100% 38 12 12 0 25 6 91 0 5 3 100%

7 MN Mesabi Community College 765 0 36 64 0 100% 33 10 10 3 19 7 78 0 1 20 100%

8 OH Kent State University Stark 1,618 0 62 38 0 100% 58 9 7 4 10 11 95 0 3 2 100%

9 SC Univ South Carolina, Sumter 1,009 0 39 61 0 100% 42 9 13 4 11 8 82 0 6 10 100%

10 VA R Bland Col William and Mary 921 0 43 57 0 100% 40 9 5 4 22 15 90 0 0 10 100%

11 WA Whatcom Community College 1,742 0 40 59 1 100% 45 10 6 3 13 8 82 0 0 18 100%

HIGH Excluding 1,742 0 62 89 3 100% 58 12 16 4 22 15 95 1 6 22 100%

AVERAGE WINDWARD CC 1,244 0 34 66 1 100% 41 10 9 3 15 10 84 0 2 14 100%

LOW 765 0 8 38 0 100% 33 8 5 2 10 7 77 0 0 2 100%

1/ Tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai‘i general fund, but for comparative purposes are included here in "Tuition Revenue" instead of "Appropriations".

2/ Library is included in Academic Support.

Page 60: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

Appendix G5WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE

PEER GROUPFISCAL YEAR 1993-94

FICE ENROLLMENT

STATE NAME CITY CODE FTE %ENROLL Grad

1 AL Lurleen B Wallace State Jr College Andalusia 8988 947 0

2 AZ South Mountain Com College Phoenix 21466 1,567 0

3 CA College of the Siskiyous Weed 1187 1,252 0

4 GA Atlanta Metropolitan College Atlanta 12165 1,235 0

5 GA Middle Georgia College Cochran 1581 1,384 0

6 HI Windward Community College Kaneohe 10390 969 0

7 MN Mesabi Community College Virginia 4009 765 0

8 OH Kent State University Stark North Canton 3054 1,618 0

9 SC Univ South Carolina, Sumter Sumter 12112 1,009 0

10 VA R Bland Col William and Mary Petersburg 3707 921 0

11 WA Whatcom Community College Bellingham 10364 1,742 0

Page 61: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

APPENDIX HTERMS AND DEFINITIONS

Benchmark, Peer Groups: The terms Abenchmark@ and Apeer@ are used to differentiatebetween the comparative group developed internally at UH and the group developed moresystematically by the National Center for Higher Education Management Systems(NCHEMS). The benchmark group reflects input from UH campus executives in theirquest to understand where each UH campus stands relative to some well-known U.S.mainland institutions. Benchmark comparison data are included in this report for theUHCC system only and are found in Tables 1 and 2. The institutions included in the peergroup were selected by NCHEMS Information Services via their Comparison GroupSelection service. Peer groups were developed for each UH campus using an indicatordatabase containing variables on institutional characteristics, faculty, finance, degreesawarded, enrollment and other pertinent data. Professional judgment was also involvedin this selection process. Peer comparison data are found in Tables A1 through G4.

Systemwide Revenues & Expenditures: Systemwide revenues and expenditures referto revenues and expenditures of University of Hawai>i system offices. Comparison datawhich include systemwide figures are found in the third and fourth tables for each campus(e.g. Tables A3 and A4 for Hawai>i CC). Systemwide revenues were apportioned by LevelIV program according to each campus= share of the total revenues for each program. Systemwide expenditures were apportioned by Level IV program according to eachcampus= share of the total expenditures for each program.

Total Revenues (TOT REV): Total revenues are calculated by summing revenues forthree items: tuition and fees, state appropriations, and gifts, contracts and endowmentincome. Although tuition revenues in FY 1993-94 were returned to the State of Hawai>igeneral fund for all the University of Hawai>i campuses, for comparative purposes they areincluded in this report under tuition and fee revenues rather than under appropriations.

Total Expenditures (TOT EXP): Total expenditures are calculated by summingexpenditures for instruction (INSTR), student services (SS), academic support (AS),institutional support (IS), operations and maintenance (O/M), funded research (FUNDRES), public services (PS) and student aid (SA).

The following definitions are from the publication entitled: Higher Education Revenues &Expenditures, FY 1993-94.

FTE Fall Enrollment (FTE Enroll): Full-time-equivalent (FTE) enrollment is the sum ofthe fall count of full-time students (those whose academic load of course work or otherrequired activity is at least 75 percent of the institution=s normal full-time load) plus one-third of the fall part-time student count. Students reported in this fall count include thosetaking work creditable toward an associate or bachelor=s degree and those studentsenrolled in a vocational or technical program that is normally terminal and results in someother formal recognition below the baccalaureate degree. Students taking these types ofcourses through correspondence study are included. Students not reported include those

Page 62: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

enrolled in non-credit adult education courses and non-credit extension courses, auditors,students studying abroad if their enrollment is only an administrative record and the fee isnominal, students in any branch campus or extension center in a foreign country, highschool students taking college courses, and students known to be enrolled concurrentlyat another college or university reporting their enrollment.

Percent Graduate Students (% Grad): Ratio of graduate to total headcount enrollment.

Tuition and Fees (Tuition): All tuition and fees (including student activity fees) assessedagainst students for education purposes. Included here are tuition and fee remissions orexemptions even though there is no intention of collecting them from the student. (Anamount equal to such remissions or exemptions should be reflected as expenditures andclassified in the category Scholarships and Fellowships or preferably as staff benefits.) Tuition and fees that are remitted to the state as an offset to the state appropriation areincluded. If the assignment of student fees to any capital or plant account is anadministrative action only, or is subject to change by the governing board, then such feesshould be reported here as current funds tuition revenues. Pledged tuition revenues underbond indenture agreements should also be reported here (a mandatory transfer of theseamounts to the Plant Fund can then be reported). An exception are monies from tuitionand fees assessed by binding external restrictions specifically for debt service oninstitutional plant or for plant renewals, replacement, or expansion, which should bereported as direct additions to Plant Funds. Tuition collected from Basic EducationalOpportunity Grants (BEOG) recipients should be reported here. Charges for room andboard, and other services rendered by auxiliary enterprises are not reported here. Feesassessed for student health services that are operated as a service to the student bodyrather than as an auxiliary enterprise should be included.

This category reports gross tuition revenues including any portion paid throughreceipt of student aid from all sources including institutionally administered financial aid. To avoid double counting of state revenues, appropriated student financial aidadministered by the institution should be reported only once as an appropriation and notas a component of tuition revenue. Similarly, revenues from endowment income and giftsused for student financial aid should be reported as income from these sources and notas tuition revenue.

Appropriations (Approp): Unrestricted and restricted current funds revenues from stateand local government appropriations. Appropriations include all monies received by theinstitution for current operating expenses including student financial aid (not for specificprojects, programs, or organizational units) through acts of the state legislature and localgovernments, except grants and contracts. Appropriations for hospitals are excluded. Federal monies stipulated for higher education and only administered by the state (e.g.,federal Morrill Act land grant appropriations and Bankhead-Nelson Appropriations) areexcluded. Federal government funds distributed to the state for unspecified generalpurposes (e.g., federal revenue sharing funds) which the state then elects to appropriateto the institution are included. Funds disbursed by a government agency to an institutionalaccount, such as payments into a state or local government retirement system on behalf

Page 63: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

on the institution, should be included. Tuition and fees revenues collected by theinstitution, remitted to the state, and then returned to the institution in the form ofappropriations, must be subtracted from the gross appropriations figure and separatelyreported as tuition. When appropriations are reverted or lapsed to the appropriatingagency, only the net appropriations should be reported.

Gifts, Contracts and Endowment Income (GC/E): Gifts and contracts includeunrestricted and restricted current funds revenues (for student financial aid, for example)from private donors for which no legal consideration is involved, and revenues from privatecontracts for which specific goods and services are provided. Such income includes onlythose gifts, grants, and contracts that are directly related to instruction, research, publicservice, or other primary institutional missions (as opposed to land rental or utility services,for example). Excludes gifts and grants and contracts for hospitals. Includes moniesreceived as a result of gifts, grants, or contracts from a foreign government, and estimateddollar amounts of contributed services. Excludes revenues derived from the sale of goodsand services incidental to the conduct of instruction, research, or public service, even if theinstitution has a contract with the recipient of the goods and services. Income from fundsheld in revocable trusts or distributable by direction of the trustees of such trusts shouldbe reported under this classification. Related indirect costs recovered should also bereported in this category.

Endowment income includes unrestricted and restricted current funds revenuesfrom endowment and income from funds held in trust by others under irrevocable trusts tothe extent expended for current operating purposes. Expenditure of capital gains fromsuch funds should be treated as transfers and not included. Endowment income used forhospitals is excluded. Institutions that have adopted a spending formula by which theyexpend not only the yield but also a prudent portion of the appreciation of the principal,should report the amount calculated by the Atotal return@ concept. The amount socalculated should be adjusted for protection of the endowment principal from its loss ofpurchasing power if that provision is part of the spending formula. Instruction (INSTR): The instruction category includes expenditures of the institution=scolleges, schools, departments, and other instructional divisions for credit and non-creditgeneral academic instruction, occupational and vocational instruction, continuing andcommunity education, special session instruction, preparatory and adult basic education,and remedial and tutorial instruction conducted by the teaching faculty. Expenditures fordepartmental research and public service that are not separately budgeted should beincluded in this classification. Expenditures for academic administration where the primaryfunction is administration (e.g., academic deans) should be reported as part of AcademicSupport.

Student Services (SS): This category includes funds expended for recruitment,admissions, registrar activities, and activities whose primary purpose is to contribute to theemotional and physical well-being of students, and to their intellectual, cultural, and socialdevelopment outside the context of the formal instructional program. Examples arestudent activities, cultural events, student newspapers, student organizations, intramural

Page 64: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

athletics, intercollegiate athletics (if the program is operated as an integral part of thedepartment of physical education and not as an essentially self-supporting activity),counseling and career guidance (excluding informal academic counseling by the faculty),student financial aid administration, and student health services (except where operatedas a self supporting auxiliary enterprise). Student services includes the administrativeallowance for Pell Grants.

Academic Support (AS): This category includes expenditures for support services thatare an integral part of the institution=s primary mission of instruction, research, and publicservice. It includes expenditures for libraries (also reported separately), demonstrationschools, museums, galleries, audio/visual services, academic computing support, ancillarysupport, academic administration (including academic deans, but not departmentchairpersons), personnel development, and course and curriculum development. Expenditures for veterinary and dental clinics are included if their primary purpose is tosupport the institutional program.

Libraries (Lib): Libraries, a subset of Academic Support, includes expenditures fororganized activities that directly support the operation of a cataloged or otherwise classifiedcollection of published material. The Libraries entry includes expenses for the purchaseof books and all forms of collected communications.

Institutional Support (IS): Institutional support includes expenditures for the day-to-dayoperational support of the entire institution, excluding expenditures for physical plantoperations. Included are expenditures for general administrative services, executivedirection and planning, legal and fiscal operations, administrative data processing, spacemanagement, employee personnel and records, logistical activities, publicrelations/development, and campus security. Allocations of institutional support should bemade to auxiliary enterprises, hospitals, etc., and not reported here. Staff benefits andcollege work-study funds should not be reported in a lump sum in this category, but aredistributed to all functions. Prorated shares of state-level coordinating board and othertypes of state system expenses assigned member institutions should be included in thiscategory.

Operation and Maintenance of Plant (O/M): Included here are all expenditures foroperations established to provide service and maintenance related to grounds and facilitiesused for educational and general purposes. This includes expenditures for utilities,custodial services, fire protection, property insurance, landscape and groundsmaintenance, major repairs and renovations, and similar items. In all cases, expendituresare net amounts charged to auxiliary enterprises, hospitals, and independent operations. Campus security is not included here. This category also does not include capitalexpenditures made from the Plant Funds accounts.

Estimated Full Instructional Expenditures (FULL INSTR): Defined by ResearchAssociates as the sum of direct expenditures for instruction and student services plusprorated indirect costs. The indirect instructional costs equal total academic and

Page 65: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES: PEER AND BENCHMARK COMPARISONS

institutional support and operation and maintenance of plant less overhead for fundedresearch and public services, estimated as 30 percent of the expenditures for these twofunctions.

Funded Research (FUND RES): The Research category includes all funds expended foractivities specifically organized to produce research outcomes and commissioned by anagency either external to the institution or separately budgeted by an organizational unitwithin the institution. Subject to these conditions, it includes expenditures for individualand/or project research as well as for research institutes and centers. Excluded arediscretionary (not separately budgeted) expenditures for departmental research and fundsused for non-research sponsored activities such as training programs.

Public Service (PS): Funds expended for activities that are primarily to provide non-instructional services that are beneficial to individuals and groups external to the institution. These activities include community service programs (excluding instructional activities)and cooperative extension services. Extension services are generally located off-campusin non-institutionally owned facilities. Included in this category are conferences, institutes,general advisory services, reference bureaus, radio and television, consulting, and similarnon-instructional services to particular sectors of the community.

Student Aid (Scholarships and Fellowships) (SA): This category includes expendituresgiven in the form of outright grants (recipients are not required to perform any service asconsideration) and trainee stipends, prizes, and awards to individuals enrolled in formalcourse work, either for credit or non-credit. Both merit (including athletic and musicscholarships) and need-based awards are included. Awards given to individuals who arenot enrolled in formal course work are excluded. If the institution is given custody of thefunds, but is not allowed to select the recipient of the grant S for example, Federal BasicEducational Opportunity Grants program or ROTC scholarships S the funds should not bereported. When services are required in exchange for financial assistance, as in theFederal College Work-Study Program or an institution-sponsored work-study program, thecharges should be classified as expenditures of the department or organizational unit towhich the service is rendered and not reported here. Aid to students in the form of tuitionor fees remissions should be included. (Remissions that are granted because of facultyor staff status are charged to staff benefits and not included here.) Pell Grants arereported as a federal allotment and not in this category. Note: institutional expendituresfor student aid are not part of the costs of instruction, but rather a redistribution of incomefunction.