Return On Investment Dirty side BHS - ROI Tool Marco Pagani Product Manager.

RReturn eturn OOn n IInvestmentnvestmentDirty side BHS - ROI Tool

Marco PaganiProduct Manager

CONTENTCONTENT

ERGONOMICS

RETURN ON INVESTMENTLINK BETWEEN THEM

ALLERGENS

ERGONOMICSERGONOMICS

• DEFINITION

GREEK WORD “ ERGON = WORK, NOMIKOS = LAW ”

“SCIENCE OF FITTING WORKPLACE CONDITIONS AND JOB DEMANDS TO THE CAPABILITIES OF THE WORKING POPULATION“


• WHY IT IS IMPORTANT THE APPLICATION OF ERGONOMICS ?

TO PREVENT MSDs (Musculo Skeletal Disorders)

Carpel tunnel syndrome, DeQuervain’s disease, Raynaud’s syndrome, Tendinitis, Tenosynovitis, Trigger finger, Low back pain, …


• WHAT CAUSES MSDs ?

Awkward Postures (arms over head, bending)

High Hand Force (pinch or grip)

Repetitive Motions (intensity, duration)

Heavy Lifting (body twist, push/pull, height)

Moderate to High Hand-Arm Vibration


• WHICH ARE THE RISK FACTORS DRIVING MSDs ?

DURATION FREQUENCY INTENSITY

TARGETS OF ERGONOMIC CONTROL PROGRAM


• IS LAB ANIMAL FIELD AWARE OF MSDs ?


• PUBLICATIONS REGARDING MSDs WITHIN LAB ANIMAL FIELD

ILAR 2003 : JOSHUA KERST (AIHA) : “An Ergonomic Process for the Care and Use of Research Animals”

[...] Animal handlers must frequently bend and twist while lifting and carrying cages, transferring animals, and replenishing feed When these forces are combined with the exertion required to push and pull carts, or move and wash cages, the cumulative forces exerted per day by a handler range between 6000 kg for small animals to 8500 kg for larger animals. [...]


• STATISTICS REGARDING MSDs WITHIN LAB ANIMAL FIELD

III : Claims submission USA years 2004 : Average Long Term Disability (LTD) and Short Term Disability (STD)

MSD : 24% LTD 19% STD


• STATISTICS REGARDING MSDs WITHIN LAB ANIMAL FIELD

III : Claims submission USA years 2004 : Average Disability Duration

MSD : 34 months LTD 76 days STD


• SCIENTIFIC STUDIES ABOUT MSDs WITHIN LAB ANIMAL FIELD

By Kind Permission of Dr.Schmidt; Helmholtz Center Munich

CUELA Mechanical /

Electronic System

(Computer Assisted Recording and Long-Term analysis of muscuolo-skeletal loads)


• SCIENTIFIC STUDIES ABOUT MSDs WITHIN LAB ANIMAL FIELD

By Kind Permission of Dr.Schmidt; Helmholtz Center Munich

UP TO 55 MOVEMENTS x MINUTE


Insurance Information Institute : Claims submission USA : Average compensation premiums

• STATISTICS REGARDING INSURANCE COMPENSATION PREMIUMS


• DRIVERS TO ACHIVE THE ERGONOMIC CONTROL PROGRAM

o KEEP THE BODY NEUTRAL

o MINIMIZE AREA OF MOVEMENT

o MINIMIZE FORCE

o MINIMIZE REPETITION


• AUTOMATION AND ERGONOMICS


PROCESS AUTOMATION. Automation, in the form of robotic cage washing and waste handling systems, has been implemented in a growing number of facilities. System components for robotic cage washing and waste handling typically includes robots, a pneumatic waste disposal and bedding dispenser system, and an indexing tunnel washer system as shown in Figure 2. Benefits of this system include decreased labor costs (minimum 50% reduction in manpower), increased capacity, decreased space requirements, and removal of workers from a high-level aeroallergen exposure and ergonomically hazardous environment. […]


• AUTOMATION AND ERGONOMICS


ALLERGENSALLERGENS

• DEFINITION OF LAB ANIMAL ALLERGY

Laboratory animal allergy (LAA) is a hypersensitivity response that may develop when susceptible persons are exposed to allergens produced by laboratory animals

LAA is most associated with exposure to fur, saliva, and urine of rats, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits

The most common symptoms are rhinitis, conjunctivitis, contact orticaria and bronchial asthma

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health reports that there are

approximately two million workers with jobs requiring constant handling of animals. One

third of these workers have allergic symptoms, and 10% have occupational

asthma caused by animal allergens.NIOSH Alert: DHHS/NIOSH

Publication no. 97-116; January 1998.

ALLERGENSALLERGENS

Average = 26.4%

ALLERGENSALLERGENS

ALLERGENSALLERGENS

TARGET : LESS THAN 5 ng/m3

RETURN ON INVESTMENTRETURN ON INVESTMENT

• HOW AUTOMATION CAN BE OBJECTIVELY JUSTIFIED ?


• HOW AUTOMATION CAN BE OBJECTIVELY JUSTIFIED ?

ROI = RETURN ON INVESTMENT


ACCEPT-REJECT DECISION:DECISION ARE BASED ON HOW THE INVESTMENT MEETS THE STRATEGIC NEEDS AT FACILITY AND ORGANIZATION LEVEL

TANGIBLECOST-

BENEFIT

INTANGIBLE (STATISTIC)

COST-BENEFIT


• TANGIBLE COSTS / BENEFITS

o MANUAL PROCESS STAFF

o AUTOMATED PROCESS STAFF

o PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION

o YEARLY MAINTENANCE

o THROUGHPUT VARIATION

o LABOR REQUESTED



NPV (NET PRESENT VALUE):TIME VALUE OF MONEY.

THE IDEA THAT MONEY AVAILABLE AT THE PRESENT TIME IS WORTH MORE THAN THE SAME AMOUNT IN THE FUTURE DUE TO ITS POTENTIAL EARNING CAPACITY



FINANCIAL RETURN IS TO BE DISCOUNTED THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT (~6 %/YEAR)


• INTANGIBLE (STATISTIC) COSTS / BENEFITSo REDUCED STD AND LTD

o PROCEDURE ENHANCEMENTS

o SAFETY INCREASE o FLEXIBILITY INCREASE

o ERGONOMIC INCREASE

o ALLERGEN EXPOSURE DECREASED

o TRACIABILITY


• INVESTMENT JUSTIFICATIONS & STRATEGIC VALUES

Potential Score

• 0: Not important to the organization or applicable to the proposed system.

• 1: Beneficial but not compelling to the organization or moderately applicable to the proposed system.

• 2: Very important to the organisation and highly applicable to the proposed system.


• INVESTMENT JUSTIFICATIONS & STRATEGIC VALUES

Factors taken in consideration and weighted on the final payback:

• Ergonomic – up to 20%

• Allergens – up to 20%

• Retraining – up to 10%

LINK BETWEEN THEMLINK BETWEEN THEM

• CORRELATION BETWEEN ERGONOMICS/ALLERGENS AND ROI

Return On Investment Dirty side BHS - ROI Tool Marco Pagani Product Manager.

Documents

Transcript of Return On Investment Dirty side BHS - ROI Tool Marco Pagani Product Manager.