Retrieval and Interpretation of UV/Vis Satellite Observations of Tropospheric Composition Randall...
-
Upload
hugo-mcdowell -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
4
Transcript of Retrieval and Interpretation of UV/Vis Satellite Observations of Tropospheric Composition Randall...
Retrieval and Interpretation of UV/Vis Satellite Observations of Tropospheric Composition
Randall Martin
With contributions from:With contributions from:Rongming Hu (Dalhousie University)Rongming Hu (Dalhousie University)
Chris Sioris, Xiong Liu, Kelly Chance (Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory)Chris Sioris, Xiong Liu, Kelly Chance (Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory)Lyatt Jaeglé, Linda Steinberger (Univerisity of Washington)Lyatt Jaeglé, Linda Steinberger (Univerisity of Washington)
Yongtao Hu, Armistead Russell (Georgia Tech)Yongtao Hu, Armistead Russell (Georgia Tech)Tom Ryerson, Andy Neuman (NOAA/CIRES)Tom Ryerson, Andy Neuman (NOAA/CIRES)
Ron Cohen (Berkeley)Ron Cohen (Berkeley)Aaron Swanson, Frank Flocke (NCAR)Aaron Swanson, Frank Flocke (NCAR)Andreas Richter (University of Bremen)Andreas Richter (University of Bremen)
Major Challenges in Tropospheric Chemistry Major Challenges in Tropospheric Chemistry More Accurate Emission InventoriesMore Accurate Emission Inventories
Understand Processes Controlling Tropospheric OzoneUnderstand Processes Controlling Tropospheric OzoneConstrain Aerosol PropertiesConstrain Aerosol Properties
Top-Down Information from the GOME and Top-Down Information from the GOME and SCIAMACHY Satellite InstrumentsSCIAMACHY Satellite Instruments
GOME 1995-2002Spatial resolution 320x40 km2
Global coverage in 3 days
SCIAMACHY 2002-presentSpatial resolution 60x30 km2
Global coverage in 6 days
Spectral Fit
Remove Stratosphere
Total NO2 Slant Column
Tropospheric NO2 Slant Column
Calculate AMF
Tropospheric NO2 Column
Martin et al., 2002, 2005
Martin et al., 2002
Palmer et al. 2001 Martin et al., 2002, 2003, 2005
5-10x1014
molec cm-2
2-10x1014
molec cm-2
40%
Pixel Uncertainty
Mean Total ±(5x1014 + 30%)
ICARTT Campaign Over and Downwind of Eastern North America in ICARTT Campaign Over and Downwind of Eastern North America in Summer 2004 Summer 2004
Aircraft Flight Tracks and Aircraft Flight Tracks and Validation LocationsValidation Locations Overlaid on SCIAMACHY Overlaid on SCIAMACHY Tropospheric NOTropospheric NO2 2 ColumnsColumns
NASA DC-8 NOAA WP-3D
May-Oct 2004
Air Mass Factor Calculation in SCIAMACHY Retrieval Needs Air Mass Factor Calculation in SCIAMACHY Retrieval Needs External Info on Shape of Vertical Profile External Info on Shape of Vertical Profile
Increased NOIncreased NOxx Emissions from Midlatitude Improves GEOS-CHEM Emissions from Midlatitude Improves GEOS-CHEM
Simulation of NOSimulation of NO22 Profiles Profiles
Remaining Discrepancy In Vertical Profile of NOx EmissionsRemaining Discrepancy In Vertical Profile of NOx Emissions
Midlatitude lightning Mean Bias in AMF:
0.4 Tg N yr-1 12% 9% 3%
1.6 Tg N yr-1 1% 5% 3%
In Situ
0.4 Tg N yr-1
1.6 Tg N yr-1
NO2 Measurements from Cohen (DC-8) and Ryerson (WP-3D)
Enhanced Midlatitude Lightning Reduces Discrepancy with SCIAMACHY Enhanced Midlatitude Lightning Reduces Discrepancy with SCIAMACHY over North Atlanticover North Atlantic
Profile of NOx Emissions (lifetime) May Explain Remaining DiscrepancyProfile of NOx Emissions (lifetime) May Explain Remaining Discrepancy
May-Oct 2004
SCIAMACHY NO2 (1015 molec cm-2)
GEOS-Chem NO2 (1015 molec cm-2)
1.6 Tg N in Midlat
GEOS-Chem NO2 (1015 molec cm-2)
0.4 Tg N in Midlat
Significant Agreement Between Coincident Cloud-Filtered Significant Agreement Between Coincident Cloud-Filtered SCIAMACHY and In-Situ MeasurementsSCIAMACHY and In-Situ Measurements
r = 0.79
slope = 0.8
1:1 line
Ryerson (WP-3D)
Cohen (DC-8)
Chris Sioris
Cloud-radiance fraction < 0.5
In-situ measurements below 1 km & above 3 km
Assume constant mixing ratio below lowest measurement
Add upper tropospheric profile from mean obs
Horizontal bars show 17th & 83rd percentiles
Cloud-filtered Tropospheric NOCloud-filtered Tropospheric NO22 Columns Retrieved from Columns Retrieved from
SCIAMACHYSCIAMACHY
May-Oct 2004
detectionlimit
A. Richter et al. Nature, 437, 129-132, 2005
1996 - 2002
Annual changes in tropospheric NO2 observed with GOME
Errorweightin
g
Conduct a Chemical Inversion & Combine Top-Down Conduct a Chemical Inversion & Combine Top-Down and Bottom-up Inventories with Error Weightingand Bottom-up Inventories with Error Weighting
A posteriori emissionsTop-Down Emissions
1015 molec cm-2
A Priori NOx EmissionsSCIAMACHY NO2 Columns
1011 molec N cm-2 s-1
GEOS-CHEM model
GEIA
May-Oct 2004
Global Optimal Emission Inventory RevealsGlobal Optimal Emission Inventory RevealsMajor Discrepancy in NOx Emissions from MegacitiesMajor Discrepancy in NOx Emissions from Megacities
r2=0.82 vs a priori
A Posteriori NOx Emissions from East Asia Exceed A Posteriori NOx Emissions from East Asia Exceed Those from Either North America or EuropeThose from Either North America or Europe
A priori (Tg N yr-1)
A posteriori (Tg N yr-1)
East Asia 6.8 9.2
North America 8.1 8.8
Europe 6.5 8.5
Africa 7.1 8.2
SE Asia & India 5.0 5.3
South America 4.4 5.1
Australia 1.1 1.9
Total 39.1 47.0
Large Change in NOx Emissions Near New York CityLarge Change in NOx Emissions Near New York City
1011 atoms N cm-2 s-1 1011 atoms N cm-2 s-1 1011 atoms N cm-2 s-1
A priori A posteriori A posteriori – A priori
7.8 Tg N 0.6 Tg N
r2 = 0.92
Evaluate Each Inventory By Conducting GEOS-CHEM Simulation & Evaluate Each Inventory By Conducting GEOS-CHEM Simulation & Sampling Model Along Aircraft Flight TracksSampling Model Along Aircraft Flight Tracks
NOx (pptv)
Simulation with A Posteriori – Simulation with A Priori
HNO3 (pptv)
7.2 Tg N
PAN (pptv)
In Situ Airborne Measurements Support In Situ Airborne Measurements Support A Posteriori InventoryA Posteriori Inventory
In Situ
GEOS-CHEM (A priori)
GEOS-CHEM (A posteriori)
New England New England New England + Gulf
P-3 Measurements from
Tom Ryerson (NOAA) Aaron Swanson Andy Neuman Frank Flocke (NCAR) (CIRES/NOAA)
Errorweightin
g
EMIS: Emissions Mapping Integration ScienceEMIS: Emissions Mapping Integration ScienceOptimize NOOptimize NOxx Emissions Emissions
A posteriori emissionsTop-Down Emissions
May-Oct 2004
1015 molecules cm-2
NOx Emissions (SMOKE/G.Tech)SCIAMACHY NO2 Columns
1011 molec N cm-2 s-1
Aug 2004
CMAQ
Algorithm for partitioning top-down NOAlgorithm for partitioning top-down NOxx inventory (2000) inventory (2000)
Algorithm tested using synthetic retrieval
GOME NOx emissions
Fuel Combustion1. Spatial location of FF-dominated regions in a priori (>90%)1
Biomass Burning2. Spatiotemporal distribution of fires used to separate BB/soil
VIRS/ATSR fire countsSoils
No fires + background
2
Jaeglé et al., 2005
Biomass Burning (2000)Biomass Burning (2000)
A prioriA priori A posterioriA posteriori
Good agreement with BB seasonality from Duncan et al. [2003]
(±200%)
r2 = 0.72
(±80%)
SE Asia/India N. Eq. Africa S. Eq. Africa
N. Eq. Africa:50% increase
SE Asia/India:46% decrease
Line: A priori(BB)
Bars: A posteriori(BB)
1010atoms N cm-2 s-1
A posteriori total
Jaeglé et al., 2005
Speciated Inventory for Soil emissionsSpeciated Inventory for Soil emissionsA posteriori 70% larger than a priori!
A prioriA priori A posterioriA posteriori
Largest soil emissions: seasonally dry tropical + fertilized cropland ecosystems
(±200%) (±90%)
r2 = 0.62
Soils
Onset of rainy season: Pulsing of soil NOx!
North Eq. Africa
Jaeglé et al., 2005
Soils
East Asia
Liu, Chance, et al., 2005
Direct Retrieval of Tropospheric Ozone from GOMEDirect Retrieval of Tropospheric Ozone from GOMEUsing Optimal Estimation in Ultraviolet with TOMS V8 Using Optimal Estimation in Ultraviolet with TOMS V8 a prioria priori
GOME GEOS-CHEM
Tro
po
sph
eric Ozo
ne C
olu
mn
(Do
bso
n U
nits)
Northern Tropics Remain a Challenge for Satellites and ModelsNorthern Tropics Remain a Challenge for Satellites and Models
Liu, Chance, et al., 2005
GOME GEOS-CHEM
R Bias R Bias
Caracas 0.57 0.8 0.54 8.7
Dakar -0.37 -3.8 0.81 5.2
Tel Aviv 0.96 -1.5 0.94 1.4
Bangkok 0.83 -2.4 0.94 7.2
Comparison with MOZAIC Ozone Measurements
Backscattered Radiation is Sensitive to Single Scattering Albedo Over Backscattered Radiation is Sensitive to Single Scattering Albedo Over Bright Surfaces Bright Surfaces
TOMS Aerosol Index Measures Absorbing Aerosols In Ultraviolet TOMS Aerosol Index Measures Absorbing Aerosols In Ultraviolet Where Rayleigh Scattering Acts as Bright SurfaceWhere Rayleigh Scattering Acts as Bright Surface
]})/[(log])/[({log100 3603311036033110 Rayleighmeas IIIIAI
July 2000
Aerosol Absorption Contributes to Differences Between Aerosol Absorption Contributes to Differences Between Aerosol Optical Depth and the Absorbing Aerosol IndexAerosol Optical Depth and the Absorbing Aerosol Index
Aerosol Vertical Profile Also ImportantAerosol Vertical Profile Also Important
July 2000
1.5
1.1
0.8
0.4
0
3.0
2.2
1.6
0.8
0
July 2000
MODIS
TOMS
Retrieval of Aerosol Single Scattering AlbedoRetrieval of Aerosol Single Scattering AlbedoDetermined with radiative transfer calculation as Determined with radiative transfer calculation as SSA that reproduces
TOMS Aerosol Index when constrained by MODIS aerosol optical depth and GEOS-CHEM aerosol vertical profile
Rongming Hu
July 2000
MODIS AOT
GEOS-CHEM profiles
LIDORT RTM
Min calc – obs aerosol index
SSA
Significant Agreement With Aerosol Single Scattering Albedo Significant Agreement With Aerosol Single Scattering Albedo Determined from AERONETDetermined from AERONET
Rongming Hu
r = 0.8
Slope = 1.01
Intercept = -0.02
ConclusionsConclusions
Growing confidence in top-down constraint on NOx emissions
Underestimate in NOx emissions from megacities, in soils, and North American lightning
Puzzling ozone distribution in northern tropics
Promise for global retrieval of aerosol single scattering albedo
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
Rongming Hu (Dalhousie University)Chris Sioris, Xiong Liu, Kelly Chance (Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory)Lyatt Jaeglé, Linda Steinberger (Univerisity of Washington)Yongtao Hu, Armistead Russell (Georgia Tech)Tom Ryerson, Andy Neuman (NOAA/CIRES)Ron Cohen (Berkeley)Aaron Swanson, Frank Flocke (NCAR)Andreas Richter (University of Bremen)
Funding: • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)• Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)• Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences (CFCAS)• Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)• Nova Scotia Research and Innovation Trust (NSRIT)