Rethinking Accessibility

12
RETHINKING ACCESSIBILITY IN E- LEARNING: TOWARD DIDACTIC GUIDELINES TO DESIGN INCLUSIVE ACTIVITIES Eleonora Guglielman ATEE Winter Conference Genoa, 07 march 2013

description

"Rethinking Accessibility in E-learning: Toward Didactic Guidelines to Design Inclusive Activity". Contribution presented at ATEE 2013 Winter Conference, Genoa, 07 march, 2013.

Transcript of Rethinking Accessibility

Page 1: Rethinking Accessibility

RETHINKING ACCESSIBILITY IN E-LEARNING:

TOWARD DIDACTIC GUIDELINES TO DESIGN INCLUSIVE ACTIVITIES

Eleonora Guglielman

ATEE Winter Conference Genoa, 07 march 2013

Page 2: Rethinking Accessibility

The emerging issues of the research✲ 2 million 600 thousand persons with disabilities in Italy,

12,403 of whom enrolled at the University (2007-08, ISTAT and Ministry of Education)

✲ Dramatically increase of the universities offering e-learning/blended courses, with use of collaborative activities (forum, chat, wiki, etc.).

✲ Access to technologies by people with disabilities is a priority at European and national level ("Law Stanca", January 9, 2004, n. 4)

✲ All students must have ensured "full access" to all study activities, including online activities (Law 104/1992 on disability, Law 17/99, specialized tutoring, Law 170/2010, learning disabilities).

Page 3: Rethinking Accessibility

The meaning of accessibilityDefinition: “the degree to which a product, device, service, or environment is available to as many people as possible”

From the technological point of view the concept is declined mainly in three areas:

Assistive technologies

Web and software standards

Learning Management Systems

Page 4: Rethinking Accessibility

A bidimensional accessibilityTechnological accessibility: access to HW and SW – accessibility of websites, LMS, digital contents.It is defined by standards and parameters

Pedagogical accessibility: ✲ Access to contents and resources✲ Access to interaction and collaboration tools (chat, forum, wiki)✲ Access to activities: workshops, debates, collaborative works,

simulationsnot still realized

Page 5: Rethinking Accessibility

A 3 levels modelAccess to VLE Access to contents Access to activitiesLogin Read text Communicate Visit the home page Convert files Interact Surfing Download contents Collaborate Read information Sharing knowledge

Building new meaningsUsing web 2.0 tools

There are different levels of accessibility, each of which is a prerequisite for subsequent

Time to rethink accessibility!

Page 6: Rethinking Accessibility

How to address the challenge?The solution: guidelines for the design of e-learning courses that are accessible both at a technological and a methodological-didactic levelThe target: Students with special educational needs (deaf, blind, motor disabilities, learning disabilities)The paradigm: Universal Design - Services and environments must be designed so that they are accessible and usable for all (in educational field: Universal Instructional Design and Universal Design for Learning)

Page 7: Rethinking Accessibility

The research phaseSurvey with the

studentsSurvey with experts Desk study

Case studies (5) Web survey (112)Interview (9)

Online data (Istat, Miur,University)

Tools:Grids for observation,

interview

Tools:Questionnaire with closed

ended questions Questionnaire with open

ended questions

Quantitative data

Page 8: Rethinking Accessibility

The GuidelinesAre formulated taking as a reference model the existing guidelines for the technological accessibility; are structured according to the macro-phases of the design of an e-learning course in the following framework

A. Pre-design B. Methodological designA1. Course Organization B1. Didactic methods and strategies

A2. Users profile and identification of prerequisites

B2. Course planning

B3. Design and structuring of contents

B4. Activities and toolsB5. Didactic support

Page 9: Rethinking Accessibility

Structure of the Guidelines

Page 10: Rethinking Accessibility

Articulation of the guidelines35 generic guidelines and 9 methodological guidelines for students with learning disabilitiesEach guideline including:✲ Phase and macroarea✲ Types of disability N O é & ✲ Indicator ✲ Methodological-didactic descriptors✲ WACG 2.0 standard(s)✲ References

Page 11: Rethinking Accessibility

Future trends✲ Decline guidelines for specific

disabilities✲ Test, validate, redesign guidelines in

online courses to their full adoption✲ Make the course staff acquire

accessibility skills✲ Contribute to the dissemination of

the culture of Universal Design✲ A new professional role: the e-tutor

expert in accessibility

Page 12: Rethinking Accessibility

Thank you for your attention

www.guglielman.com