Retention of critical knowledge
-
Upload
dnv-gl-old-account -
Category
Documents
-
view
384 -
download
4
description
Transcript of Retention of critical knowledge
lost knowledge
DNV | KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Retention of Critical Knowledge
PEOPLEPROJECTSASSETS
2 3
lost knowledgeROCK /// lost knowledge
2 3
lost knowledgelost knowledgeCOST OF IGNORANCE /// Costly mistakes are repeated, as earlier ones were not recorded or analysed
People. Organisations are potentially vulnerable to the
loss of knowledge through retirement, career moves or
mobility of staff. This will diminish performance until
such time as work is either reorganised or successors
become equally productive.
Projects. Organisations risk reinventing the wheel and
replicating mistakes if knowledge from projects is not
captured, transferred and re-used.
Opportunities to build new knowledge and share good
practices are lost.
Assets. If not managed carefully, asset knowledge may
be lost, resulting in higher lifetime costs, performance
gaps or increased exposure to safety risk. Poor asset
knowledge utilisation, improvement and hand-over to
new owners or operators hampers operational excellence
and introduces risk for asset safety and availability.
DNV has developed significant experience in designing,
coordinating and embedding programmes to capture
and transfer critical knowledge from people, projects
and assets for clients.
4 5
Good management practice
The capture and transfer of knowledge should be part of any organisation’s management system.
■ PEOPLE Do your HR processes pro-actively help to reduce the time-to-competence of successors,
ensure your reputation is not damaged through the loss of knowledge and prevent the loss
of productivity associated with staff mobility, retirement and career moves?
■ PROJECTS Do your programme and project management procedures ensure that learning from
successes and failures is undertaken rigorously and systematically? Can the knowledge
accumulated in projects be re-used by current and future projects?
■ ASSETS Are you able to access and re-use knowledge of your assets, from the original design intent
to current performance? Is this knowledge held in various repositories and by a variety of
staff and members of the supply chain?
Over recent years, DNV has developed robust processes to assess and mitigate associated with lost
knowledge. These include the screening and risk assessment of organisations’ experts, knowledge and
learning infrastructures focussed on projects and single points of knowledge for assets.
DNV deploys a portfolio of tools that support knowledge capture and transfer, involving interviewing,
workshop facilitation and video capture, thereby producing knowledge artefacts that are often visual in
nature and therefore easy to read, making complex matters accessible for end users.
DNV’s perspective is that a Retention Of Critical Knowledge (ROCK) programme should be initiated as a part
of ‘good management’ and not as a troubleshooting exercise when for example an expert leaves, a project is
faced with a critical issue or when historical records on assets cannot be retrieved or interpreted correctly.
The examples provided next show a small selection of tools that illustrates the variety of methods and results
that DNV can offer.
COST OF IGNORANCE /// Employees spend too much time to search for information and knowledgeable people
6 7
ROCK Toolbox /// a selection of DNV’s ROCK tools for people COST OF IGNORANCE /// Good ideas and best practices are not shared, raising costs and missing opportunities
Pearls of Wisdom involve
the selection of a list of an
individual’s contacts, activities
and lessons learned. As part
of succession planning, this
method helps to prioritise
and capture key information.
A Network Map illustrates an
expert’s key contacts and their
relationships or can be focused
on a knowledge area identifying
the key actors.
Shadowing is a technique
to transfer a specific set of
expertise and skills to
a successor.
An Audience with... is a
session that helps to transfer
knowledge through the expert
telling stories and anecdotes.
Sessions are usually filmed
to enable as many people as
possible to access the content
provided.
8 9
COST OF IGNORANCE /// Loss of critical knowledge due to retirement and mobility of workforceROCK Toolbox /// a selection of DNV’s ROCK tools for projects
A Project Chronology
captures the key knowledge
accumulated over the project’s
history to date. This helps to
capture memory in a visual way.
Conducted in the presence
of new staff, this supports
induction and accelerates
learning.
The Job Manual is an extensive
handover document that will
allow project members to
understand critical tasks and
responsibilities and the resources
needed for successful execution
of the role.
There are a number of
Gateway Reviews that enable
project managers to mobilise
knowledge already captured in
the organisation’s memory and
to contact others who can help
make projects more effective.
Despite its name, this tool can
be used to kick-start the various
project gateways.
Peer Assists follow a
structured, 10-step process
in which individuals share an
issue or problem for which they
are seeking feedback from a
number of peers in order to
solve problems collectively.
10 11
COST OF IGNORANCE /// 1 or 2 key employees hold crucial knowledge, putting continuity at riskROCK Toolbox /// a selection of DNV’s ROCK tools for assets
The Doormat Letter is a
checklist that needs to be
completed to ensure that all
tasks relating to the asset are
handed over properly. The letter
is created by interviewing key
experts.
A Concept Map breaks down
key knowledge areas into
their component parts and
demonstrates their relationships.
Deep Dive is a recorded,
annotated walkthrough of a
plant and its assets to mobilise
and transfer knowledge
and experience to capture
specific aspects of a plant’s
configuration, using relevant
documents like drawings and
maps and recording the walk
and the commentary.
The Plant lite is a tool to
mobilise and transfer knowledge
and experience about
specific aspects of a plant’s
configuration based on a review
of using relevant documents like
drawings and maps.
12 13
COST OF IGNORANCE /// Knowledge is not readily available at the point of actionDNV’s systematic approach to assessing and mitigating the risks of knowledge loss
SCREENING of people, projects
or assets for potential loss of knowledge
IDENTIFICATION of knowledge areas at risk
PH
ASE
1
PH
ASE
2
Result: People, projects or assets are scored 1-5
> critical, unique knowledge or skills
> critical knowledge and skills
5
4
3
2
1 > common knowledge and skills
> proceduralised, non-mission- critical knowledge and skills
> important, semi-documented knowledge and skills
screening questionnaire people, project or asset
critical knowledge areas
effort to retain knowledge
impa
ct o
f kn
owle
dge
loss
5
4
3
2
1
1 2 3 4 5
14 15
COST OF IGNORANCE /// Employees use outdated and non-validated information in actionDNV’s systematic approach to assessing and mitigating the risks of knowledge loss
DNV provides the following services that cover all aspects of effective ROCK
programmes and will support you in:
■ Screening of people, projects or assets for potential loss of knowledge;
■ Identification of knowledge areas at risk;
■ Selection and execution of actions to capture and transfer knowledge;
■ Recommending IT environments that support easy retrieval through improved
document indexing and structuring;
■ Developing a sustainable programme for knowledge retention.
Our delivery modes are:
■ Consultancy, programme management, coaching and (in house) training.PH
ASE
3
ACTIONS to capture and transfer selected knowledge areas
> Advanced ROCK
> Intermediate ROCK
> Basic ROCK
> Standard procedures exist
> Acceptable, no action required
action level CA
PTU
RE
&
TRA
NSFE
R
ROCK toolbox
WHAT ARE YOUR COSTS OF IGNORANCE?
iris
des
ign
.eu
For more information please contact Rob van der Spek, Director of Knowledge Management Advisory Services
/// t +31 (0)6 54781900 /// e [email protected], [email protected] /// w www.dnv.com/knowledgemanagement