Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

23
Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber

Transcript of Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Page 1: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study

Emma WorthingtonAndrew Webber

Page 2: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Background of the Study

229 offenders interviewed

17 correctional centres

66% response rate

Asked:

– About experiences

– About demographics

– To rate characteristics of homes

Page 3: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Age of Offenders Interviewed

Page 4: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Motivation for Offending

Page 5: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Drugs Taken (Comparison)

Page 6: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Income Gained (Comparison)

Page 7: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Choosing Targets

Page 8: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Checklist of Home Features

Imagine a home you are thinking of breaking into. Let’s say you are 50/50 right now on whether to break in. I’m going to change something about the home, and I want you to tell me whether you would break in now.

Page 9: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Checklist of Home Features

Page 10: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Detractors

Page 11: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Attractors

Page 12: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

No Difference

Page 13: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Average Rating

Page 14: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Typologies: Inexperienced

Page 15: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Summary of Features

Detractors Mixed Attractors

Page 16: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.
Page 17: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.
Page 18: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.
Page 19: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.
Page 20: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Photo Features

Page 21: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Summary of Features

Detractors Mixed Attractors

Page 22: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Conclusion

Offenders are experts

Primarily motivated by drugs, but:

– Respond rationally to cues

– Consciously consider cues

Some features more effective

– Useful for evidence-based policy

Page 23: Results of the Residential Break and Enter Offender Study Emma Worthington Andrew Webber.

Policy Recommendations

Drug treatment for offenders

Awareness raising re: security/design features (for public and industry)