Result Framework Document (RFD) of Indian Railways along...

188 INDIAN RAILWAYS ANNuAL REpORT AND ACCOuNTS 2012-13

Result Framework Document (RFD) of Indian Railways along with its Composite Score given by the High Power Committee

RFD 2011-12:

Section 1:

Ministry’s Vision, mission, objectives and targets.

Vision Statement

Indian Railways shall provide safe, efficient, affordable, customer-focussed and environmentally sustainable integrated transportation solutions. It shall be a modern vehicle of inclusive growth, connecting regions, communities, ports and centres of industry, commerce, tourism and pilgrimage across the country.

The mission areas identified for realizing the main objectives stated in the Vision are the following:

1. To augment the capacity to handle freight services by constructing new lines, laying double lines where necessary and through signaling improvements.

2. To take up necessary works to ease bottlenecks in the transportation network so as to achieve higher speed and throughput.

3 To induct modern rolling stock to derive the benefit of updated technology.

4. To monitor the system of grievance redressal so that the level of satisfaction among rail users improves.

5. To monitor closely all aspects of earnings and expenditure so that the organisation functions in an efficient and cost effective manner.

6. To constantly upgrade the facilities extended to passengers and to minimize the adverse environmental impact of the organization’s activities.

7. To constantly strive to improve the working and living conditions of Railway employees.

189INDIAN RAILWAYS ANNuAL REpORT AND ACCOuNTS 2012-13

8. To continuously innovate and stay up to date in terms of technological advancement and to achieve the best possible standards of safety in train operations at all times.

Function:-

1. Government Railways- All matters, including those relating to Railway revenues and expenditure, but excluding Railway Inspectorate and Railway Audit.

2. Non-Government Railways – Matters in so far as provision for control by the Ministry of Railways, Railway Board as provided in the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989) or in the contracts between the Government and Railways, or in any other statutory enactments, namely, regulations in respect of safety, maximum and minimum rates and fares etc. excluding the item of work allocated to the Department of Urban Development.

3. Parliament questions/matters regarding offences relating to pilferage of railway property and offences relating to crime on Government Railways and non-Government Railways.

4. Administration of pension rules applicable to Railway employees.


Sec

tion

2:

Key

obje

ctiv

es, su

cces

s in

dica

tors

and

tar

gets

:

12

34

56

78

910

11

Objective

Weight

Action

Successindicator

Unit

Weight

Targ

et C

rite

ria

Val

ue.

Exc

elle

nt10

0%Ve

ry g

ood

90%

Goo

d80

%Fa

ir70

%Po

or60

%

Frei

ght

Ser

vice

s-G

row

th a

ndIm

prov

emen

tin

qua

lity

20%

Volu

mes

Orig

inat

ing

load

ing

Mill

ion

Tonn

es5

1000

993

975

950

924

Net

tran

spor

tatio

nB

illio

nN

TK

m7

665

658

640

620

600

Spee

dyde

liver

yA

vg.s

peed

of

Goo

ds tr

ains

Km

ph2

26.8

26.4

26.0

25.6

25.2

Impr

oved

qua

lity

and

effic

ient

ut

iliza

tion

Com

plai

nts

per

Bill

ion

NT

Km

Num

ber

2

The

AT

F ha

d su

gges

ted

this

but

thes

e st

atis

tics

are

not b

eing

m

aint

aine

d an

d he

nce

diffi

cult

to m

onito

r. A

lso

the

num

ber

of

com

plai

nts

is v

ery

smal

l as

com

pare

d to

Pas

seng

er s

egm

ent.

Hen

ce o

mitt

ed fo

r th

e tim

e be

ing.

Prod

uctiv

e ut

iliza

tion

of a

vaila

ble

wag

ons

NT

Km

s pe

r w

agon

-da

y(B

G 8

-Wh)

9500

9400

9270

9140

9000

Mar

ket S

hare

in

com

petit

ive

segm

ents

Fini

shed

Ste

el%

247

.046

.75

46.2

545

.75

45.2

5

Cem

ent

%2

47.2

547

.046

.045

.044

.0

Pass

enge

rS

ervi

ces-

Gro

wth

and

Impr

ovem

ent

in q

ualit

y

10%

Volu

mes

Non

-sub

urba

nB

illio

n P

Km

s3

1100

1085

1020

950

870

Subu

rban

Bill

ion

PK

ms

215

215

014

714

414

0

Impr

oved

qual

ity

Pun

ctua

lity1

Perc

ent

274

7270

6866

Com

plai

nts

per

billi

on

P.km

s.N

umbe

r3

21.0

21.5

22.0

22.5

23.0

Thi

rd P

arty

Eva

luat

ion

Gra

deT

he A

TF

had

sugg

este

d th

is b

ut th

is w

ould

be

diffi

cult

to

mea

sure

on

a pa

n In

dia

leve

l, he

nce

omitt

ed fo

r th

e tim

e be

ing.

It w

ill b

e ex

plor

ed fr

om n

ext y

ear

1 M

odifi

ed D

efin

ition

of P

unct

ualit

y. D

etai

ls in

Sec

.4


Inve

stm

ents

- M

obili

satio

n an

d as

set c

reat

ion

17%

Cap

acity

augm

enta

tion

and

Ass

etcr

eatio

n

New

line

sK

ms.

211

0010

7556

042

028

0

Dou

blin

gK

ms.

310

0086

766

746

426

0

Flag

ship

Pro

ject

sA

chie

vem

ent a

s pe

r lis

t--N

umbe

rs5

65

43

2

Loco

man

ufac

ture

Equ

ated

Num

bers

22

590

580

570

560

550

Wag

on m

fg.

Equ

ated

Num

ber3

219

000

1800

016

600

1530

014

000

Coa

ch m

fg.

Num

bers

240

0037

8036

9036

0035

00

Inve

stm

ent T

hrou

gh P

PP

Valu

e of

Pro

ject

s`C

rore

s1

2000

1776

1600

1500

1400

Perf

orm

ance

- m

onito

ring

and

impr

ovem

ent

12%

Con

trol

wor

king

ex

pend

iture

and

boo

stea

rnin

gsO

pera

ting

ratio

%8

9091

.192

9394

Prog

ress

in C

ritic

al

Proj

ects

(>`1

50 c

rore

s)N

umbe

r as

per

list

Num

ber

49

76

54

Pro

duct

ivit

y- m

onito

ring

and

impr

ovem

ent

5%Im

prov

emen

t in

prod

uctiv

ity o

f sta

ff

Wor

ksho

p (I

nclu

ding

PU

) St

aff

Turn

over

per

em

ploy

ee- l

akhs

of

Rs.

per

empl

oyee

pe

r an

num

211

.00

10.6

410

.37

10.1

09.

90

All

staf

f

Gro

ss e

arni

ngs

in la

khs

of R

s.pe

r em

ploy

ee p

er

annu

m

38.

408.

067.

807.

607.

40

Am

enit

ies

for

rail

us

ers

5%A

men

ities

Impr

ovem

ent

at s

tatio

ns a

nd o

n-bo

ard

IT in

pas

seng

er

rese

rvat

ions

e-tic

kets

, i-ti

cket

s so

ld(in

lakh

s N

os.)

110

2510

0899

097

095

0

Faci

lity

for

diffe

rent

ly-

able

dSt

atio

ns c

over

ed

256

055

054

554

053

0

On-

boar

d fa

cilit

ies

Num

ber

of T

rain

s un

der

OB

HS

131

030

029

028

027

0

Prov

isio

n of

sup

erio

r To

ilets

on

trai

nsN

umbe

r of

toile

ts1

510

500

250

200

150

2. B

ased

on

Trac

tive

Effo

rt3. B

ased

on

Pay-

to-ta

re R

atio


Impr

ovem

ent

of E

nvir

onm

ent

and

Ene

rgy

Man

agem

ent

8%

Impr

ovem

ent i

n fu

el

effic

ienc

y

SFC

Die

sel(g

oods

)Lt

rs /1

000

GT

Km

22.

142.

182.

202.

222.

25

SEC

Ele

ctric

al (

good

s)K

WH

/ 100

0 G

TK

m.

26.

97.

17.

37.

57.

7

Shun

ting

Ltrs

/100

0GT

KM

12.

362.

432.

472.

512.

55

Affo

rest

atio

nTr

ees

plan

ted

Num

bers

(lakh

s)1

102

9996

9390

Non

-con

vent

iona

lE

nerg

y an

d en

viro

nmen

t im

prov

emen

t ini

tiativ

es

Num

ber

ofne

w in

itiat

ives

Num

bers

22+

1 Pi

lot

21

Pilo

t1

conc

ept

Nil

Saf

ety:

E

nhan

cem

ent

initi

ativ

es8%

Initi

ativ

es to

redu

ce

acci

dent

s

On

Boa

rd In

stal

latio

ns

incl

udin

g V

CD

Num

ber

(Avg

.sco

re a

s pe

r lis

t)2

97

65

4

Fixe

d In

stal

latio

nsN

umbe

r (A

vg.s

core

as

per

list)

3

97

65

4

Elim

inat

ion

of L

C

gate

s(le

vel c

ross

ing

gate

s)C

ompl

eted

in th

e ye

arN

umbe

rs3

325

300

275

250

225


Man

dato

ry s

ucce

ss i

ndic

ator

s :

1.E

ffici

ent

Func

tioni

ng o

f the

RFD

Syst

em

Tim

ely

sub-

mis

sion

of D

raft

for

App

rova

l

On-

Tim

eSu

bmis

sion

Dat

e2%

May

20,

2011

May

23,

2011

May

25,

20

11M

ay 2

6,

2011

June

3,

2011

Tim

ely

subm

issi

on o

f Res

ults

On-

time

subm

issi

onD

ate

1%M

ay 2

, 20

12M

ay 3

, 20

12M

ay 4

, 20

12M

ay 5

, 20

12M

ay 6

, 20

12Fi

naliz

e a

Stra

tegi

c P

lan

(afte

r m

eetin

g al

l int

erm

edia

te d

ead-

lines

)Fi

naliz

e th

e St

rate

gic

Pla

n fo

r ne

xt 5

yea

rsD

ate

2%D

ec.1

0,20

11D

ec. 1

5,20

11D

ec. 2

0,

2011

Dec

.24

, 201

1D

ec.

31,2

011

2. Im

prov

ing

Inte

rnal

Effi

cien

cy/ R

espo

nsiv

e-ne

ss/ S

ervi

ce d

eliv

ery

of

Min

istr

y/ D

epar

tmen

t

Dev

elop

RFD

s fo

r al

lR

espo

nsib

ility

Cen

tres

(Sub

ordi

nate

Offi

ces,

Atta

ched

Offi

ces,

Aut

onom

ous

Bod

ies)

Perc

enta

ge o

fR

Cs

cove

red

%2%

100

9590

8580

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

Savo

ttam

Cre

ate

a Sa

votta

mC

ompl

iant

Sys

tem

toIm

plem

ent,

Mon

itor

and

Rev

iew

Citi

zen’

s/C

lient

’sC

hart

er

Dat

e1%

Dec

. 10,

2011

Dec

. 15,

20

11D

ec. 2

0,20

11D

ec 2

4,20

11D

ec 3

1,

2011

Cre

ate

a Sa

votta

m C

om-

plia

nt s

yste

m T

o re

dsre

ss

and

Mon

itor

publ

icG

rieva

nces

Dat

e1%

Dec

. 10,

2011

Dec

. 15,

20

11

Dec

. 20,

2011

Dec

. 24,

2011

Dec

. 31,

2011

3. E

nsur

ing

Com

plia

nce

To th

eFi

nanc

ial

Acc

ount

abili

tyFr

amew

ork

Tim

ely

sub-

mis

sion

of

ATN

on

Aud

it Pa

ras

of C

&A

G

Perc

enta

ge o

f AT

NS

sub-

mitt

ed W

ithin

due

dat

e(4

mon

ths)

from

Dat

e of

pr

esen

tatio

n of

Rep

ort t

oPa

rliam

ent b

y C

AG

dur

-in

g th

e Ye

ar

%0.

5%10

090

8070

60

Tim

ely

subm

issi

on o

f AT

Rs

to

the

PAC

Sec

tt on

PA

C R

epor

ts

Perc

enta

ge o

f AT

Rs

sub-

mitt

ed w

ithin

due

dat

e(6

mon

ths)

from

dat

e of

pr

esen

tatio

n of

Rep

ort

to P

arlia

men

t by

PAC

du

ring

the

year

%0.

5%10

090

8070

60

Ear

ly d

ispo

sal o

f pen

ding

AT

Ns

on A

udit

Para

s of

C&

AG

R

epor

t pre

sent

ed to

Par

liam

ent

befo

re 3

1.3.

2011

Perc

enta

ge o

f out

stan

d-in

g AT

Ns

disp

osed

off

durin

g th

e ye

ar%

0.5%

100

9080

7060

Ear

ly d

ispo

sal o

f pen

ding

AT

Rs

on P

AC

repo

rt p

rese

nted

to

Parli

amen

t bef

ore

31.3

.201

1

Perc

enta

ge o

f out

stan

d-in

g AT

Rs

disp

osed

off

durin

g th

e ye

ar%

0.5%

100

9080

7060


4. A

dmin

istr

ativ

eR

efor

ms

Iden

tify

pote

ntia

l are

as

of c

orru

ptio

n re

late

d to

or

gani

zatio

n ac

tiviti

es

and

deve

lop

an a

ctio

n pl

an to

miti

gate

them

Dev

elop

an

actio

n pl

an

for

e-of

fice

Impl

emen

ta-

tion

in th

e de

part

men

t /m

inis

try

Fina

lize

an

actio

n pl

an

to m

itiga

te

pote

ntia

l ar

eas

of c

or-

rupt

ion

%2%

Dec

.10,

2011

Dec

.15,

20

11D

ec. 2

0,

2011

Dec

. 24,

2011

Fina

lize

an

actio

n pl

an

for

e-of

fice

Dat

e2%

Dec

.10,

20

11D

ec. 1

5,

2011

Dec

. 20,

20

11D

ec. 2

4,

2011


Lis

ts o

f Fla

gshi

p pr

ojec

ts, C

riti

cal

proj

ects

and

Saf

ety

init

iati

ves:

I. F

lags

hip

proj

ects

II. C

riti

cal

proj

ects

III.

Saf

ety

init

iati

ves

Nam

e of

the

pro

ject

Targ

etN

ame

of t

he p

roje

ctTa

rget

On-

boa

rd:

1. T

PW

S : >

210=

2 , 1

60-2

09=

1.

2. A

CD

/TC

AS:

4-5

div

ns=

2, 1

-3 d

ivns

=1.

3. V

CD

: >60

00 =

2 , 4

500-

6000

=1.

4.Fo

gSaf

e: >

80 =

2 ,

60-8

0 =

1

5. G

SMR

: >23

0 km

s=2,

150

-229

=1.

Fixe

d in

stal

lati

ons:

1. C

entr

alis

ed i’

lock

ing:

200

stn

s(m

in)=

1

2. M

AC

LS w

ith L

ED

lam

ps: 1

40 (

min

) =

1

3. C

ompl

ete

trac

k ci

rcui

ting

of s

tatio

n se

ctio

ns:

700

loca

tions

(m

in)=

2

4. B

lock

pro

ving

by

axle

cou

nter

s: 2

00 (

min

)

=2

5. In

terlo

ckin

g an

d pr

ovis

ion

of t

elep

hone

s at

LCs:

250

min

=2

6. Is

olat

ion

in o

ld c

ross

ing

stat

ions

: 40

sta

tions

(min

) =

2

1. U

dham

pur-S

rinag

ar-B

ara-

mul

a (N

ew R

ail l

ine)

Com

plet

ion

of tu

nnel

(T

-80

– lo

nges

t eve

r)1.

Kos

i Brid

geTo

be

com

plet

ed

2. H

arm

uti –

Nah

arla

gun

(New

Lin

e)W

ork

to c

ompl

ete

2. B

ansp

ani-J

arol

i (9

km)

doub

ling

To b

e co

mpl

eted

3. R

angi

a –

Mur

kong

sele

k (G

auge

con

vers

ion)

Firs

t sec

tion

127

km i.

e. R

angi

a –

Ran

gapa

ra n

orth

3. B

imla

garh

-Dum

itra

doub

ling

To b

e co

mpl

eted

4. R

ae B

arei

ly C

oach

Fac

-to

ry

Furn

ishi

ng S

hop,

Fin

ishi

ng S

hop,

Tr

ain

Ligh

ting

shop

, Fur

nish

ing

and

Fini

shin

g st

ores

, Res

iden

tial u

nits

- 20

0 un

it, T

wo

Sub

stat

ions

of 1

1 K

VA

Com

pres

sor

room

4. G

orak

hpur

Can

tt-B

ai-

talp

ur d

oubl

ing

(34.

13

km)

To b

e co

mpl

eted

5. D

edic

ated

Fre

ight

Cor

-rid

or C

orpo

ratio

n of

Indi

a Li

mite

d

Aw

ard

of C

ivil

Con

tract

for K

hurja

-K

anpu

r sec

tion

of E

aste

rn D

FC &

pa

ckag

e 1&

2 of

Wes

tern

DFC

pha

se 1

.

5. G

orak

hpur

-Sah

janw

a do

ublin

g (1

7.7

km)

To b

e co

mpl

eted

6. H

igh

Spee

d R

ail c

orrid

ors

Four

pre

feas

ibili

ty s

tudi

es to

be

com

plet

ed6.

Jak

hal-M

ansa

-Dou

-bl

ing

on S

PR

sec

tion

To b

e co

mpl

eted

7. R

ailw

ay E

lect

rific

atio

n pr

ojec

ts- M

urad

abad

-Lu

ckno

w-G

onda

, Tiru

chi-

rapa

lly-M

adur

ai, M

umba

i Su

burb

an D

C to

AC

(WR

)

To b

e co

mpl

eted

7. J

hars

ugud

a-R

enga

li do

ublin

g (2

5.6

km)

To b

e co

mpl

eted

8. C

onne

ctiv

ity to

Ba-

rang

Pro

ject

s (C

utta

ck-

Bar

ang,

Bar

ang-

Khu

rda

Roa

d. A

nd R

ajat

garh

-B

aran

g)

Bhu

bnes

hwar

-Ba-

rang

to b

e co

m-

plet

ed

9. A

nupp

ur-B

ilasp

ur

doub

ling

Chh

ulha

-Jai

thar

i-N

igor

a do

ublin

g to

be

com

plet

ed

10. U

dhna

-Jal

gaon

with

el

ectr

ifica

tion

85 k

ms

cum

ulat

ive

to b

e co

mpl

eted


Section 3: Trend Values of the success indicators

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

(tgt)2012-13

(Projection)2013-14

(Projection)

Originating loading Million tonnes 888 924 993 1,070 1,150

Net Transporotation Billion NTKM 601 612 658 700 750

Avg speed of goods trains KMPH 25.8 26 26.4 26.8 27.2

Non suburban Billion PKMs 772 867.962 1,085 1,180 1,260

Suburban Billion PKMs 130.917 139.219 150 158 167

Punctuality (M/E) % 74 69 72 74 76

Complaints per billion Pkms.

Nos. 26.26 22.3 21.5 21.0 20.5

New Lines KMS 258 700 700 1,000 1,200

Doubling KMS 448 700 867 1,000 1,050

Electrification (RKm) KMS 1,117 975 1,110 1,500 1,500

Signaling improvements Value of works

(in `)1,055 972 1,100 1,850 2,000

Loco mfg (DSL-Elc) nos 498 527 580 630 675

Wagon mfg nos 13,068 14,703 18,000 19,000 20,000

Coach mfg nos 3,494 36,561 3,780 3,900 4,000

Operating ratio % 95.3 92.3 91.1 90.0 89.0

Manpower productivity Gross earning

in lakhs of ` per employee/pa

6.38 7.20 8.06 8.86 9.50

Plan expenditure on staff quarters, staff amenities and passenger amentities

`(crs) 1,474.15 1,520.86 1,645 1,720 1790

Trees planted nos(in lacs) 95.1 94.38 99 100 102

Non conventional energy and environment improve-ment initiativesNumber of new intiatives

Nos - - 1 1 1

Expenditure on ACD `(crs) 28.3 11.4 28 150 150

Closure of LC gate (level crossing gates)

nos 192 363 300 330 360

New initiative launch in the year

nos - - 1 1 1


Section 4: Description and definition of success indicators and measurement methodology:

Freight services constitute the most important segment of activity of railway business. The earnings from freight account form more than two-thirds of the total earnings. Accordingly, the weightage has been fixed at 25%.

As visualized in the Vision 2020 Document, increase in volumes as well as increase in speed is the objective of improving the services. The success indicators identified are:

(i) Originating Traffic

(ii) Net transportation

(iii) Average speed of goods trains

These are described below:

(i) Originating Loading

At every loading point, individual wagon of the rake are subjected to weighment and record of loading is usually available on a computerized electronic weighing machine. This loading is authentically declared, documented and used as the basis for billing. Accumulated data of originating loading is reported to the division, zone and Railway Board. Hence, this improved index of success indicator is adopted in the RFD.

(ii) Net Transportation

The total quantum of transportation is expressed in GTKMs (Gross Tonne Kilometres) and NTKM (Net Tonne Kilometres). The NTKM is the product of net weight of the commodity loaded and the distance in kilometers over which it is moved. This is the better index of customer interest as compared to GTKM because GTKM includes the dead weight of the wagon also, which is of no interest to the customer. Systematic records exist in the railway system to capture and measure the NTKMs.

(iii) Average speed of goods trains

The speed in kmph of goods train is routinely monitored and documented over clearly demarcated sections of railway divisions. In fact, it is an important index of the level of congestion, optimum utilization of available paths and many other operational variables. It, therefore, embodies a number of situational factors – both controllable and extraneous. The organizational goal is to eliminate the known causes of


congestion so as to improve the average speed of trains. Hence, it qualifies as an important parameter of performance and thus, included in the RFD.

(iv) Passenger Kilometres:

The passenger kms is the most commonly used index of the quantum of passenger transportation. It is arrived at by statistics of ticket sales and is compiled in a systematic manner at all levels in railway system.

Improvment or deterioration of the punctuality of that train. Elaborate exercise of time-tabling is undertaken and sufficient allowances are also provided for recovery on engineering account, traffic account and loco account. Once the time-table is framed, it becomes the reference for deciding whether a particular train is running punctually or not.

(v) Punctuality:

At present a train is treated as punctual if it reaches its destination within 15 minutes of its scheduled arrival time. The current computerized monitoring system has been introduced in 2009 under ICMS (Integrated Coaching Management System) which is linked to COA (Control Office Application). This methodology is based on the customer’s perception and not based on zone wise statistical performance which was the case earlier.

(vi) Flagship projects:

For the purpose of RFD 10 projects have been selected based on their impact on the Railways image and Financial Health in the long run.

(vii) Critical Projects

For the purpose of the RFD these projects are selected which are critical to immediate operational needs of the Railways and also included in the list of projects monitored by Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation.

(viii) Wagon Manufacturing

Since variety of wagons is manufactured every year and their payload to tare ratio is different these have been indexed on the basis of standard wagon. Higher payload to tare ratio is advantageous to railways for efficient transportation. Technology also plays important role in maximizing the pay to tare ratio.


(ix) Operating ratio

It means number of rupees spent to earn `100. Lesser the operating ratio better is the financial health of the Railways.

(x) Productivity

The productivity of railway staff is expressed in terms of gross earnings per employee on roll. For workshop staff it is expressed as total credits (in `) per employee working in either workshops or production units.

(xi) The no. of stations on which all the essential prescribed amenities for differently abled persons is provided.

(xii) On Board House Keeping Services (OBHS): It is scheme to provide certain prescribed services through a contract by staff travelling on board in order to enhance the level of passenger satisfaction.

(xiii) SFC Diesel: - Specific fuel consumption is a measure of the fuel efficiency of diesel locomotives

(xiv) SEC Electrical: - Specific energy consumption is a measure of the energy efficiency of electric locomotives

(xv) VCD: - Vigilance Control Device: Design to stop a train if the driver is not vigilant for a specific duration.

Section 5: Specific performance requirements from other departments that are critical for delivering agreed results.

1. Budgetary Support: Indian Railways is a Ministry of the Government of India. The tariff structure is, therefore, a matter of Government policy decided, taking into account not only the commercial considerations of operating the service but also of social and people oriented objectives of the Government of India. The internal resources, therefore, are constrained by the overall view taken by the Government as a whole. Under these circumstances, it is imperative that adequate budgetary support is extended to the infrastructure development plans drafted to create the necessary infrastructure for sustaining the growth. Hence, budgetary support from Government of India (Finance Ministry ) in the right proportion is essentially required.

2. Law & Order: Indian Railways traverses through the individual States in its day to day operations. It is also


highly vulnerable to disturbances due to agitations and vandalism. Therefore, there is heavy dependency on the State Government’s support and adequate empowerment of the Government Railway Police (GRP) to ensure freedom from obstruction and vandalism.

Section 6: Outcome/activities of Department/Ministry

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

S.No.

Outcome/Impact

Jointly responsible

for influencing this outcome/impact with the following organisation

(s)/Department/

Ministry(ies)

Success Indicator (s)

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

1 Freight services

State Govern-ments for law

and order

Net trans-portation in billion NTKms

601 612 658 700 750

2. Passenger services

State Govern-ments for law

and order

Punctuality in percent-

age74 69 72 74 76

3. Invest-ment for improve-ment of

infrastruc-ture

Finance Ministry and

Planning Commission

for Budgetary support

Total Plan outlay (in

crores of `) 39672 40315 57630 77000 100000

Composite score for RFD in 2011-12

Composite score approved by the High Power Committee for the Railways’ RFD 2011-12 84.02%

Result Framework Document (RFD) of Indian Railways along...

Documents

Transcript of Result Framework Document (RFD) of Indian Railways along...