Restoration of Urban lakes · 2020. 9. 17. · Solving Bangalore Lakes problem Step #1: Create...

37
Restoration of Urban lakes: a case study from Bangalore Dr Priyanka Jamwal (ATREE, Bangalore) Prof. Laurence Carvalho (UKCEH, Edinburgh) [email protected] @Jamwalpriyanka [email protected] @LacLaurence

Transcript of Restoration of Urban lakes · 2020. 9. 17. · Solving Bangalore Lakes problem Step #1: Create...

  • Restoration of Urban lakes:a case study from Bangalore

    Dr Priyanka Jamwal (ATREE, Bangalore)

    Prof. Laurence Carvalho (UKCEH, Edinburgh)

    [email protected] @[email protected] @LacLaurence

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • Bangalore’s Lakes – The Challenge

    Poor quality is threatening multiple

    benefits derived from the city’s lakes:

    o Groundwater recharge and quality of

    borehole water

    o Fisheries

    o Irrigation water

    o Green spaces for recreation

    o Biodiversity refuge in city

  • Phenomenal Population Growth Inadequate STP capacity

    The Problem

  • Solutions – Beacons of hope

  • Questions addressed in talk

    1. What does monitoring data tell us about current status and future wastewater treatment needs?

    2. What is the effectiveness of wastewater treatment?

    3. Goals for lake restoration?

    4. Recommendations

    Bellandur Lake Untreated sewage

    Jakkur LakeSewage plant AND wetland treatment

    Untreated “Control” Site

    Community Rejuvenation Site

    Photograph: Aaditya Sood

  • Status of Jakkur & Bellandur Lakes

    1. Water quality (BOD, DO, Pathogens)

    2. Ecological health (Algae)

    3. Methane and other greenhouse gas emissions

  • Jakkur vs Bellandur plots

    Inflows OutflowsCW Inflows Outflows

    Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)

    Jakkur Bellandur

    Drinking Water Treatment & Recreational Use: BOD target ≤3 mg/l)

  • Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (Midday)

    Fisheries Use: CPCB DO target >4 mg/l)

  • Jakkur DO (Sunrise)

    • Oxygen declines at night below CPCB quality target

    • Reduced habitat availability for fish

  • Pathogens – faecal coliforms

    Inflows OutflowsCW Inflows Outflows

    Jakkur Bellandur

  • Cyanobacteria in Jakkur Lake exceed WHO high risk threshold for recreational (bathing) use

    Anne DobelPhytoplankton (algae)

  • Jakkur: Trophic status (Phytoplankton abundance)

  • Phosphate variation in Jakkur lake

    P-threshold for ecological response (

  • Methane & CO2Stella White, Julia Drewer, Carole Helfter, Amy Pickard, Sumita Bhattacharyya

    Bellandur Jakkur

    0

    2

    4

    6

    Methane CO2 Methane CO2

    Jakkur (close up)

    Wastewater treatment also greatly reduces methane emissions

  • Questions

    2. What is the effectiveness of wastewater treatment?

    3. Goals for lake restoration?

  • • Upgradation of Lake STP- Additional technologies for removal of Nitrogen

    • Addition of EM ‘Effective Microorganisms’ balls to reduce organic matter and nutrient loads

    • Around 50 EM balls and 20 liters of EM Solution at the inlet and the outlet of lake

    Interventions at Jakkur Lake

  • Jakkur Lake

  • Effectiveness of STP upgrade on inflow

  • Effectiveness of EM balls - Questionable

    (mg/l)

    (mg/l)

  • No significant improvement in lake water quality

    (mg/l)

  • Aerators installed at HAL + Streams Inlet (BL3). Photographs taken on 04-02-2020

    Intervention at Bellandur Lake – Aerators deployed at the Inlet

  • Aerators installed at Koramangala-Agara Inlet (BL4). Photographs taken on 04-02-2020

    Intervention at Bellandur Lake – Aerators deployed at the Inlet

  • No significant improvement in lake water quality

  • Restoration Goals –Unclear

    Restoration objectives as per detailed project report (DPR)- Bellandur Lake

    • Improving trophic state (water quality).

    • Enhancing recreational activities (e.g. swimming, boating, fishing, bird watching).

    • Enhancing lake values (historic, conservation).

    • Enhancing lake use (water source).

  • Effectiveness of the interventions

  • Use Details

    Raw water source (untreated) (A)pH (6.5-8.5), BOD5 (≤2 mg/l), Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (≥6 mg/l)

    Total coliforms (≤50 MPN/100 ml)

    Recreation (organized bathing) (B)

    pH (6.5-8.5), BOD5 (≤3 mg/l)

    Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (≥5 mg/l)

    Total coliforms ≤500 MPN/100 ml)

    Drinking water source (treated) (C)pH (6-9), BOD5 (≤3 mg/l)

    Dissolved Oxygen (DO) (≥ 4 mg/l)

    Total coliforms (≤5000 MPN/100 ml)

    Fisheries (D)pH (6.5-8.5)

    Dissolved Oxygen (≥ 4 mg/l)

    Free ammonia as N (≤1.2mg/l).

    Irrigation (E)

    pH (6.0 to 8.5)

    Electrical Conductivity (≤2250 µmhos/cm)

    Sodium absorption Ratio (SAR≤26)

    Boron (≤2mg/l)

    Designated Best Use - Water Quality Criteria

    ????

  • https://kspcb.gov.in/CPCB-Water-Quality-Index.pdf

    C

    Water Quality Index

    https://kspcb.gov.in/CPCB-Water-Quality-Index.pdf

  • Indicator SDG Indicator Type Impact Impact SDG

    Nutrients, Secchi, chlorophyll-a 6 Water Quality Ecosystem health 6.4

    Dissolved oxygen 6 Water Quality Food: Fishery potential 2

    Faecal coliforms and pathogens 6 Water Quality Public Health 3

    Cyanobacteria 6 Water Quality Public Health 3

    Mosquito larvae abundance 3 Public Health Public Health 3

    Fish catch per unit effort (sustainable fishery) 2 Hunger Food: fishery sustainability 8

    Macrophyte species and abundance 6 Ecological Health Well-being, crops, energy 3

    Greenhouse gases 13 Climate Action Climate mitigation 13

    Re-defining Restoration Targets

    Sumita Bhattacharyya

    PhD

  • Solving Bangalore Lakes problem

    Step #1: Create

    consensus

    through

    participatory lake

    visioning

    Step #2: Establish

    quantitative/

    economically

    feasible

    goals for restoration

    Step #3: Build

    an evidence-

    base

    of solutions and

    foster learning

    Step #4: Build

    communities

    towards an

    integrated

    “bluegreen-

    grey water

    infrastructureplan”

    https://www.csei.org/insights

  • Technologies

    Instream Treatment systems

    Decentralised Treatment Systems

    • Freshwater savings• Improved water quality

    Improvement in water quality

  • Engagement with stakeholders and citizens Co-developing “Water solutions” workshop with stakeholders and business,

    Engagement with Citizen Groups

    http://blrlakesdashboard.org/atree/lakes/#/app/welcome

    Citizen Dashboard

  • Solutions Workshop

  • Solutions for Bellandur & Jakkur

    Bellandur Lake• STP treatment necessary to reduce organic

    loading to reduce methane emissions and stop fire and foam

    • Recovery a long-term process - CW and in-stream treatments will also be necessary. Aeration to speed up recovery

    Jakkur Lake• P-recovery at STP

    • Constructed wetland needs upgrading and maintained regularly

  • Nutrient reduction (especially P)• P-recovery at STP• Effective constructed wetlands for

    NO3 removal

    Solutions for reducing algal blooms

    Other solutions• Aerate/mix water column to

    favour more beneficial algae• Hydrogen peroxide treatment• Algal harvesting for biogas

    generation

    Organic Pollution

    Nutrient Pollution

    Restored Lake

  • General Recommendations

    • On-going investment needed in both centralised and decentralised water treatment

    • Water quality standards need to be comprehensive and updated to urban context of multiple use

    • Monitoring needs to be outcome focused, not just episodic reporting

    • Need for rapid, publicly available data to track water quality and ecological health

  • Acknowledgements

    • Anne Dobel• Stella White• Carole Helfter• Julia Drewer• Amy Pickard• Dan Read• Iain Gunn

    • Veena Srinivasan• Durba Biswas• Shashank• Sumita Bhattacharyya• Pavan Muttepawar• Chandan Gowda• Ramya• Richu• Malkan

    [email protected] @[email protected] @LacLaurence

    Further Information:

    Dr Priyanka JamwalProf Laurence Carvalho

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]