Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Series, 20172018 · Responsible Conduct of Research...
143
Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Series, 20172018 Misconduct in Research & Creative Activities --February 8, 2018-
Transcript of Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop Series, 20172018 · Responsible Conduct of Research...
Responsible Conduct of ResearchWorkshop Series 2017-shy‐2018
Misconduct in Research amp Creative Activities
--February 8 2018-
James Pivarnik
uml Research Integrity Officer curren Professor of Kinesiology amp Epidemiology
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
What Every Student Should Know About Research Misconduct
James M Pivarnik PhD Research Integrity Officer (RIO) Michigan State University wwwriomsuedu RIOmsuedu 107 Olds Hall 517-432-6698
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
A few recent research misconduct cases
Marc Hauser
bull Studied cognitive evolution in primates
bull Found guilty of 8 counts of research misconduct in 2010
bull Harvard placed him on administrative leave he later resigned
Dipak K Das
bull Studied resveratrol bull Found guilty by
UCONN of 145 instances of Research Misconduct
bull Case began as an anonymous tip in 2008
Dong-Pyou Han
bull HIVAIDS researcher bull Added human HIV
antibodies to rabbit blood
bull The scam went on for years the investigator resigned from IA State in Oct 2013
bull Sentenced to 57 months in prison
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
The Poehlman case running away from the truth
John E Dahlberf and Christian C Mahlers US Department of Health amp Human Services Office of Research Integrity 5 US Depanment of Health amp Human Services Office ofthe General Counsel
Keywords scientific misconduct lifetime debarment criminal fraud gerontology research menopause transition
ABSTRACT Eric T Poehlman PhD was an internationally recognized tenured professor at the University ofVermont (UVM) in Burlington when in October 2000 a junior member ofPoehlman s laboratory became convinced that he had altered data from a study on aging volunteers from the Burlington area This suspicion developed into one ofthe most significant cases ofscientific misconduct in the history ofthe US Department ofHealth andHuman Services (HHS) Office ofResearch Integrity (ORI) launching a US Department ofJustice (DOJ) civil and criminal fraud investigation and eventually to a much publicized guilty plea andfelony conviction In the end Dr Poehlman admitted to 54 findings ofscientific misconduct made by the UVM and ORI agreed to retract or correct ten ofhis publications and to exclude himself from federal procurement and nonprocurement transactions for life The United States Governments handling of this case was distinguished by a highly cooperative approach that integrated the resources ofthe US Attorneys Office for the District of Vermont (USAO) and both ORI and the Office ofthe Inspector General (OIG) in HHS in the common goal ofprosecuting research fraud
bull The content of this article represents the personal views of the authors and does not express the opinion or policy ofDHHS or its components
A paper on this topic was presented at the 6th International Bioethics Conference on the subject of The Responsible Conduct ofBasic and Clinical Research held in Warsaw Poland 3-4 June 2005
Addresses for correspondence John E Dahlberg PhD Senior Investigator Division of Investigative Oversight Office ofResearch Integrity US Department of Health amp Human Services Tower Oaks Bldg Suite 750 Rockville Maryland 20852 USA email jdahlbergosophsdhhsgov
Christian C Mahler JD Senior Anomey Office of the General Counsel Public Health Division US Department of Health amp Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Suite 4A-53 Parklawn Bldg Rockville Maryland 20857 USA email cmahlerpscgov
1353-3452 2006 Published by Opragcn Publications hupwwwopragencouk
Science and Engineering Ethics Volume I 2 Issue I 2006 157
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bullii~ M h MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE =Q
middotmiddot-Iv~ _ tee - AM PATHS FORMARYLAND ENTREPRENEUR ampINNOVATORS JC$
UPDATE This press release refers to study results that are preliminary and have not been subjected to the peer review scientific process
COLLEGE PARK Md - Fifth Quarter Fresh a new high-protein
chocolate milk helped high school football players improve their
cognitive and motor function over the course of a season even
after experiencing concussions a new preliminary University of
Maryland study shows
The study funded through the Maryland Industrial Partnerships program and
conducted byJae Kur Shim a professor of kinesiology in the School of Public Health
followed 474 football players from seven high schools in Western Maryland
throughout the fall 2014 season
High school football players regardless of concussions who drank Fifth Qurter
Fresh chocolate milk during the season showed positive results overall said Shim
Athletes who drank the milk compared to those who did not scored higher after
the season than before it started specifically in the areas ofverbal and visual
memory
Football players were tested before the season after concussions and post-season
Dropbox Download high-quality Fifth Quarter Fresh videos photos and logos (including those shown below) via Mtechs public Dropbox folder
Fifth Quarter Fresh bottle
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
HEALTHNEWSREVIEW SCIENCE~US BAD SCIENCE
The University of Maryland Has a Burgeoning Chocolate-Mi lk Concussion Scandal on Its Hands
Mill 11ifoflI
Why wont the University of Maryland talk about By Jesse Slngal WFollow JesseS1119althe chocolate milkconcussion study it was so
January20 2016eager to promote lt 103pm
roSTEDBY CATEGORIES TAGS 5 SharesHealth care journalism News chocolate milk concussions
releases University o f Marvland
D Sharbull 12k
EJ rweet 363
Bl Sharo
Editors note In response toconcerns first raised by HealthNewsRevieworg in a news release review and
the following blog post the UniversityofMaryland has announced it is conducting an investigation into pound11 Sharamp
the study at the centerof this controversy Jll Email
Why did the University of Maryland issue multiple news releases about a health research project Photo- 11stration Photo Pa idl KloloCraaUve Coffmon~ and then decline to talk about it Thats just one of the questions piling up about research On December 22 the University of Maryland published a remarkable involving high school football players
press release about some research it had conducted According to theconcussions and a brand of chocolate milk release a study conducted by a professor at the UMD School of Public
It started routinely I was asked by Health had shown that a product called Fifth Quarter Fresh - basically a HealthNewsRevieworg to take the first look at a fancy fortified chocolate milk - helped high school football players news release from the University of Maryland improve their cognitive and motor function over the course ofa season Concussion-Related Measures Improved In
even after experiencing concussions High School Football Players Who Drank New
Chocolate Mllk UM D Study Shows read the Given the current focus on youth concussions its no surprise that this
headline The lead went further claiming not just an association but that the milk was responsib le news traveled fast and that the claim appears to have benefited the company in question Motivated by what appeared to be sturdy scientific
WJhealthnewsrevieworg categorynews-releases-2 gh~protein chocolate m i lk helped high school football players ymagcomsclenceofus
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
James Pivarnik
uml Research Integrity Officer curren Professor of Kinesiology amp Epidemiology
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
What Every Student Should Know About Research Misconduct
James M Pivarnik PhD Research Integrity Officer (RIO) Michigan State University wwwriomsuedu RIOmsuedu 107 Olds Hall 517-432-6698
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
A few recent research misconduct cases
Marc Hauser
bull Studied cognitive evolution in primates
bull Found guilty of 8 counts of research misconduct in 2010
bull Harvard placed him on administrative leave he later resigned
Dipak K Das
bull Studied resveratrol bull Found guilty by
UCONN of 145 instances of Research Misconduct
bull Case began as an anonymous tip in 2008
Dong-Pyou Han
bull HIVAIDS researcher bull Added human HIV
antibodies to rabbit blood
bull The scam went on for years the investigator resigned from IA State in Oct 2013
bull Sentenced to 57 months in prison
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
The Poehlman case running away from the truth
John E Dahlberf and Christian C Mahlers US Department of Health amp Human Services Office of Research Integrity 5 US Depanment of Health amp Human Services Office ofthe General Counsel
Keywords scientific misconduct lifetime debarment criminal fraud gerontology research menopause transition
ABSTRACT Eric T Poehlman PhD was an internationally recognized tenured professor at the University ofVermont (UVM) in Burlington when in October 2000 a junior member ofPoehlman s laboratory became convinced that he had altered data from a study on aging volunteers from the Burlington area This suspicion developed into one ofthe most significant cases ofscientific misconduct in the history ofthe US Department ofHealth andHuman Services (HHS) Office ofResearch Integrity (ORI) launching a US Department ofJustice (DOJ) civil and criminal fraud investigation and eventually to a much publicized guilty plea andfelony conviction In the end Dr Poehlman admitted to 54 findings ofscientific misconduct made by the UVM and ORI agreed to retract or correct ten ofhis publications and to exclude himself from federal procurement and nonprocurement transactions for life The United States Governments handling of this case was distinguished by a highly cooperative approach that integrated the resources ofthe US Attorneys Office for the District of Vermont (USAO) and both ORI and the Office ofthe Inspector General (OIG) in HHS in the common goal ofprosecuting research fraud
bull The content of this article represents the personal views of the authors and does not express the opinion or policy ofDHHS or its components
A paper on this topic was presented at the 6th International Bioethics Conference on the subject of The Responsible Conduct ofBasic and Clinical Research held in Warsaw Poland 3-4 June 2005
Addresses for correspondence John E Dahlberg PhD Senior Investigator Division of Investigative Oversight Office ofResearch Integrity US Department of Health amp Human Services Tower Oaks Bldg Suite 750 Rockville Maryland 20852 USA email jdahlbergosophsdhhsgov
Christian C Mahler JD Senior Anomey Office of the General Counsel Public Health Division US Department of Health amp Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Suite 4A-53 Parklawn Bldg Rockville Maryland 20857 USA email cmahlerpscgov
1353-3452 2006 Published by Opragcn Publications hupwwwopragencouk
Science and Engineering Ethics Volume I 2 Issue I 2006 157
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bullii~ M h MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE =Q
middotmiddot-Iv~ _ tee - AM PATHS FORMARYLAND ENTREPRENEUR ampINNOVATORS JC$
UPDATE This press release refers to study results that are preliminary and have not been subjected to the peer review scientific process
COLLEGE PARK Md - Fifth Quarter Fresh a new high-protein
chocolate milk helped high school football players improve their
cognitive and motor function over the course of a season even
after experiencing concussions a new preliminary University of
Maryland study shows
The study funded through the Maryland Industrial Partnerships program and
conducted byJae Kur Shim a professor of kinesiology in the School of Public Health
followed 474 football players from seven high schools in Western Maryland
throughout the fall 2014 season
High school football players regardless of concussions who drank Fifth Qurter
Fresh chocolate milk during the season showed positive results overall said Shim
Athletes who drank the milk compared to those who did not scored higher after
the season than before it started specifically in the areas ofverbal and visual
memory
Football players were tested before the season after concussions and post-season
Dropbox Download high-quality Fifth Quarter Fresh videos photos and logos (including those shown below) via Mtechs public Dropbox folder
Fifth Quarter Fresh bottle
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
HEALTHNEWSREVIEW SCIENCE~US BAD SCIENCE
The University of Maryland Has a Burgeoning Chocolate-Mi lk Concussion Scandal on Its Hands
Mill 11ifoflI
Why wont the University of Maryland talk about By Jesse Slngal WFollow JesseS1119althe chocolate milkconcussion study it was so
January20 2016eager to promote lt 103pm
roSTEDBY CATEGORIES TAGS 5 SharesHealth care journalism News chocolate milk concussions
releases University o f Marvland
D Sharbull 12k
EJ rweet 363
Bl Sharo
Editors note In response toconcerns first raised by HealthNewsRevieworg in a news release review and
the following blog post the UniversityofMaryland has announced it is conducting an investigation into pound11 Sharamp
the study at the centerof this controversy Jll Email
Why did the University of Maryland issue multiple news releases about a health research project Photo- 11stration Photo Pa idl KloloCraaUve Coffmon~ and then decline to talk about it Thats just one of the questions piling up about research On December 22 the University of Maryland published a remarkable involving high school football players
press release about some research it had conducted According to theconcussions and a brand of chocolate milk release a study conducted by a professor at the UMD School of Public
It started routinely I was asked by Health had shown that a product called Fifth Quarter Fresh - basically a HealthNewsRevieworg to take the first look at a fancy fortified chocolate milk - helped high school football players news release from the University of Maryland improve their cognitive and motor function over the course ofa season Concussion-Related Measures Improved In
even after experiencing concussions High School Football Players Who Drank New
Chocolate Mllk UM D Study Shows read the Given the current focus on youth concussions its no surprise that this
headline The lead went further claiming not just an association but that the milk was responsib le news traveled fast and that the claim appears to have benefited the company in question Motivated by what appeared to be sturdy scientific
WJhealthnewsrevieworg categorynews-releases-2 gh~protein chocolate m i lk helped high school football players ymagcomsclenceofus
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
What Every Student Should Know About Research Misconduct
James M Pivarnik PhD Research Integrity Officer (RIO) Michigan State University wwwriomsuedu RIOmsuedu 107 Olds Hall 517-432-6698
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
A few recent research misconduct cases
Marc Hauser
bull Studied cognitive evolution in primates
bull Found guilty of 8 counts of research misconduct in 2010
bull Harvard placed him on administrative leave he later resigned
Dipak K Das
bull Studied resveratrol bull Found guilty by
UCONN of 145 instances of Research Misconduct
bull Case began as an anonymous tip in 2008
Dong-Pyou Han
bull HIVAIDS researcher bull Added human HIV
antibodies to rabbit blood
bull The scam went on for years the investigator resigned from IA State in Oct 2013
bull Sentenced to 57 months in prison
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
The Poehlman case running away from the truth
John E Dahlberf and Christian C Mahlers US Department of Health amp Human Services Office of Research Integrity 5 US Depanment of Health amp Human Services Office ofthe General Counsel
Keywords scientific misconduct lifetime debarment criminal fraud gerontology research menopause transition
ABSTRACT Eric T Poehlman PhD was an internationally recognized tenured professor at the University ofVermont (UVM) in Burlington when in October 2000 a junior member ofPoehlman s laboratory became convinced that he had altered data from a study on aging volunteers from the Burlington area This suspicion developed into one ofthe most significant cases ofscientific misconduct in the history ofthe US Department ofHealth andHuman Services (HHS) Office ofResearch Integrity (ORI) launching a US Department ofJustice (DOJ) civil and criminal fraud investigation and eventually to a much publicized guilty plea andfelony conviction In the end Dr Poehlman admitted to 54 findings ofscientific misconduct made by the UVM and ORI agreed to retract or correct ten ofhis publications and to exclude himself from federal procurement and nonprocurement transactions for life The United States Governments handling of this case was distinguished by a highly cooperative approach that integrated the resources ofthe US Attorneys Office for the District of Vermont (USAO) and both ORI and the Office ofthe Inspector General (OIG) in HHS in the common goal ofprosecuting research fraud
bull The content of this article represents the personal views of the authors and does not express the opinion or policy ofDHHS or its components
A paper on this topic was presented at the 6th International Bioethics Conference on the subject of The Responsible Conduct ofBasic and Clinical Research held in Warsaw Poland 3-4 June 2005
Addresses for correspondence John E Dahlberg PhD Senior Investigator Division of Investigative Oversight Office ofResearch Integrity US Department of Health amp Human Services Tower Oaks Bldg Suite 750 Rockville Maryland 20852 USA email jdahlbergosophsdhhsgov
Christian C Mahler JD Senior Anomey Office of the General Counsel Public Health Division US Department of Health amp Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Suite 4A-53 Parklawn Bldg Rockville Maryland 20857 USA email cmahlerpscgov
1353-3452 2006 Published by Opragcn Publications hupwwwopragencouk
Science and Engineering Ethics Volume I 2 Issue I 2006 157
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bullii~ M h MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE =Q
middotmiddot-Iv~ _ tee - AM PATHS FORMARYLAND ENTREPRENEUR ampINNOVATORS JC$
UPDATE This press release refers to study results that are preliminary and have not been subjected to the peer review scientific process
COLLEGE PARK Md - Fifth Quarter Fresh a new high-protein
chocolate milk helped high school football players improve their
cognitive and motor function over the course of a season even
after experiencing concussions a new preliminary University of
Maryland study shows
The study funded through the Maryland Industrial Partnerships program and
conducted byJae Kur Shim a professor of kinesiology in the School of Public Health
followed 474 football players from seven high schools in Western Maryland
throughout the fall 2014 season
High school football players regardless of concussions who drank Fifth Qurter
Fresh chocolate milk during the season showed positive results overall said Shim
Athletes who drank the milk compared to those who did not scored higher after
the season than before it started specifically in the areas ofverbal and visual
memory
Football players were tested before the season after concussions and post-season
Dropbox Download high-quality Fifth Quarter Fresh videos photos and logos (including those shown below) via Mtechs public Dropbox folder
Fifth Quarter Fresh bottle
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
HEALTHNEWSREVIEW SCIENCE~US BAD SCIENCE
The University of Maryland Has a Burgeoning Chocolate-Mi lk Concussion Scandal on Its Hands
Mill 11ifoflI
Why wont the University of Maryland talk about By Jesse Slngal WFollow JesseS1119althe chocolate milkconcussion study it was so
January20 2016eager to promote lt 103pm
roSTEDBY CATEGORIES TAGS 5 SharesHealth care journalism News chocolate milk concussions
releases University o f Marvland
D Sharbull 12k
EJ rweet 363
Bl Sharo
Editors note In response toconcerns first raised by HealthNewsRevieworg in a news release review and
the following blog post the UniversityofMaryland has announced it is conducting an investigation into pound11 Sharamp
the study at the centerof this controversy Jll Email
Why did the University of Maryland issue multiple news releases about a health research project Photo- 11stration Photo Pa idl KloloCraaUve Coffmon~ and then decline to talk about it Thats just one of the questions piling up about research On December 22 the University of Maryland published a remarkable involving high school football players
press release about some research it had conducted According to theconcussions and a brand of chocolate milk release a study conducted by a professor at the UMD School of Public
It started routinely I was asked by Health had shown that a product called Fifth Quarter Fresh - basically a HealthNewsRevieworg to take the first look at a fancy fortified chocolate milk - helped high school football players news release from the University of Maryland improve their cognitive and motor function over the course ofa season Concussion-Related Measures Improved In
even after experiencing concussions High School Football Players Who Drank New
Chocolate Mllk UM D Study Shows read the Given the current focus on youth concussions its no surprise that this
headline The lead went further claiming not just an association but that the milk was responsib le news traveled fast and that the claim appears to have benefited the company in question Motivated by what appeared to be sturdy scientific
WJhealthnewsrevieworg categorynews-releases-2 gh~protein chocolate m i lk helped high school football players ymagcomsclenceofus
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
A few recent research misconduct cases
Marc Hauser
bull Studied cognitive evolution in primates
bull Found guilty of 8 counts of research misconduct in 2010
bull Harvard placed him on administrative leave he later resigned
Dipak K Das
bull Studied resveratrol bull Found guilty by
UCONN of 145 instances of Research Misconduct
bull Case began as an anonymous tip in 2008
Dong-Pyou Han
bull HIVAIDS researcher bull Added human HIV
antibodies to rabbit blood
bull The scam went on for years the investigator resigned from IA State in Oct 2013
bull Sentenced to 57 months in prison
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
The Poehlman case running away from the truth
John E Dahlberf and Christian C Mahlers US Department of Health amp Human Services Office of Research Integrity 5 US Depanment of Health amp Human Services Office ofthe General Counsel
Keywords scientific misconduct lifetime debarment criminal fraud gerontology research menopause transition
ABSTRACT Eric T Poehlman PhD was an internationally recognized tenured professor at the University ofVermont (UVM) in Burlington when in October 2000 a junior member ofPoehlman s laboratory became convinced that he had altered data from a study on aging volunteers from the Burlington area This suspicion developed into one ofthe most significant cases ofscientific misconduct in the history ofthe US Department ofHealth andHuman Services (HHS) Office ofResearch Integrity (ORI) launching a US Department ofJustice (DOJ) civil and criminal fraud investigation and eventually to a much publicized guilty plea andfelony conviction In the end Dr Poehlman admitted to 54 findings ofscientific misconduct made by the UVM and ORI agreed to retract or correct ten ofhis publications and to exclude himself from federal procurement and nonprocurement transactions for life The United States Governments handling of this case was distinguished by a highly cooperative approach that integrated the resources ofthe US Attorneys Office for the District of Vermont (USAO) and both ORI and the Office ofthe Inspector General (OIG) in HHS in the common goal ofprosecuting research fraud
bull The content of this article represents the personal views of the authors and does not express the opinion or policy ofDHHS or its components
A paper on this topic was presented at the 6th International Bioethics Conference on the subject of The Responsible Conduct ofBasic and Clinical Research held in Warsaw Poland 3-4 June 2005
Addresses for correspondence John E Dahlberg PhD Senior Investigator Division of Investigative Oversight Office ofResearch Integrity US Department of Health amp Human Services Tower Oaks Bldg Suite 750 Rockville Maryland 20852 USA email jdahlbergosophsdhhsgov
Christian C Mahler JD Senior Anomey Office of the General Counsel Public Health Division US Department of Health amp Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Suite 4A-53 Parklawn Bldg Rockville Maryland 20857 USA email cmahlerpscgov
1353-3452 2006 Published by Opragcn Publications hupwwwopragencouk
Science and Engineering Ethics Volume I 2 Issue I 2006 157
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bullii~ M h MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE =Q
middotmiddot-Iv~ _ tee - AM PATHS FORMARYLAND ENTREPRENEUR ampINNOVATORS JC$
UPDATE This press release refers to study results that are preliminary and have not been subjected to the peer review scientific process
COLLEGE PARK Md - Fifth Quarter Fresh a new high-protein
chocolate milk helped high school football players improve their
cognitive and motor function over the course of a season even
after experiencing concussions a new preliminary University of
Maryland study shows
The study funded through the Maryland Industrial Partnerships program and
conducted byJae Kur Shim a professor of kinesiology in the School of Public Health
followed 474 football players from seven high schools in Western Maryland
throughout the fall 2014 season
High school football players regardless of concussions who drank Fifth Qurter
Fresh chocolate milk during the season showed positive results overall said Shim
Athletes who drank the milk compared to those who did not scored higher after
the season than before it started specifically in the areas ofverbal and visual
memory
Football players were tested before the season after concussions and post-season
Dropbox Download high-quality Fifth Quarter Fresh videos photos and logos (including those shown below) via Mtechs public Dropbox folder
Fifth Quarter Fresh bottle
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
HEALTHNEWSREVIEW SCIENCE~US BAD SCIENCE
The University of Maryland Has a Burgeoning Chocolate-Mi lk Concussion Scandal on Its Hands
Mill 11ifoflI
Why wont the University of Maryland talk about By Jesse Slngal WFollow JesseS1119althe chocolate milkconcussion study it was so
January20 2016eager to promote lt 103pm
roSTEDBY CATEGORIES TAGS 5 SharesHealth care journalism News chocolate milk concussions
releases University o f Marvland
D Sharbull 12k
EJ rweet 363
Bl Sharo
Editors note In response toconcerns first raised by HealthNewsRevieworg in a news release review and
the following blog post the UniversityofMaryland has announced it is conducting an investigation into pound11 Sharamp
the study at the centerof this controversy Jll Email
Why did the University of Maryland issue multiple news releases about a health research project Photo- 11stration Photo Pa idl KloloCraaUve Coffmon~ and then decline to talk about it Thats just one of the questions piling up about research On December 22 the University of Maryland published a remarkable involving high school football players
press release about some research it had conducted According to theconcussions and a brand of chocolate milk release a study conducted by a professor at the UMD School of Public
It started routinely I was asked by Health had shown that a product called Fifth Quarter Fresh - basically a HealthNewsRevieworg to take the first look at a fancy fortified chocolate milk - helped high school football players news release from the University of Maryland improve their cognitive and motor function over the course ofa season Concussion-Related Measures Improved In
even after experiencing concussions High School Football Players Who Drank New
Chocolate Mllk UM D Study Shows read the Given the current focus on youth concussions its no surprise that this
headline The lead went further claiming not just an association but that the milk was responsib le news traveled fast and that the claim appears to have benefited the company in question Motivated by what appeared to be sturdy scientific
WJhealthnewsrevieworg categorynews-releases-2 gh~protein chocolate m i lk helped high school football players ymagcomsclenceofus
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
A few recent research misconduct cases
Marc Hauser
bull Studied cognitive evolution in primates
bull Found guilty of 8 counts of research misconduct in 2010
bull Harvard placed him on administrative leave he later resigned
Dipak K Das
bull Studied resveratrol bull Found guilty by
UCONN of 145 instances of Research Misconduct
bull Case began as an anonymous tip in 2008
Dong-Pyou Han
bull HIVAIDS researcher bull Added human HIV
antibodies to rabbit blood
bull The scam went on for years the investigator resigned from IA State in Oct 2013
bull Sentenced to 57 months in prison
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
The Poehlman case running away from the truth
John E Dahlberf and Christian C Mahlers US Department of Health amp Human Services Office of Research Integrity 5 US Depanment of Health amp Human Services Office ofthe General Counsel
Keywords scientific misconduct lifetime debarment criminal fraud gerontology research menopause transition
ABSTRACT Eric T Poehlman PhD was an internationally recognized tenured professor at the University ofVermont (UVM) in Burlington when in October 2000 a junior member ofPoehlman s laboratory became convinced that he had altered data from a study on aging volunteers from the Burlington area This suspicion developed into one ofthe most significant cases ofscientific misconduct in the history ofthe US Department ofHealth andHuman Services (HHS) Office ofResearch Integrity (ORI) launching a US Department ofJustice (DOJ) civil and criminal fraud investigation and eventually to a much publicized guilty plea andfelony conviction In the end Dr Poehlman admitted to 54 findings ofscientific misconduct made by the UVM and ORI agreed to retract or correct ten ofhis publications and to exclude himself from federal procurement and nonprocurement transactions for life The United States Governments handling of this case was distinguished by a highly cooperative approach that integrated the resources ofthe US Attorneys Office for the District of Vermont (USAO) and both ORI and the Office ofthe Inspector General (OIG) in HHS in the common goal ofprosecuting research fraud
bull The content of this article represents the personal views of the authors and does not express the opinion or policy ofDHHS or its components
A paper on this topic was presented at the 6th International Bioethics Conference on the subject of The Responsible Conduct ofBasic and Clinical Research held in Warsaw Poland 3-4 June 2005
Addresses for correspondence John E Dahlberg PhD Senior Investigator Division of Investigative Oversight Office ofResearch Integrity US Department of Health amp Human Services Tower Oaks Bldg Suite 750 Rockville Maryland 20852 USA email jdahlbergosophsdhhsgov
Christian C Mahler JD Senior Anomey Office of the General Counsel Public Health Division US Department of Health amp Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Suite 4A-53 Parklawn Bldg Rockville Maryland 20857 USA email cmahlerpscgov
1353-3452 2006 Published by Opragcn Publications hupwwwopragencouk
Science and Engineering Ethics Volume I 2 Issue I 2006 157
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bullii~ M h MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE =Q
middotmiddot-Iv~ _ tee - AM PATHS FORMARYLAND ENTREPRENEUR ampINNOVATORS JC$
UPDATE This press release refers to study results that are preliminary and have not been subjected to the peer review scientific process
COLLEGE PARK Md - Fifth Quarter Fresh a new high-protein
chocolate milk helped high school football players improve their
cognitive and motor function over the course of a season even
after experiencing concussions a new preliminary University of
Maryland study shows
The study funded through the Maryland Industrial Partnerships program and
conducted byJae Kur Shim a professor of kinesiology in the School of Public Health
followed 474 football players from seven high schools in Western Maryland
throughout the fall 2014 season
High school football players regardless of concussions who drank Fifth Qurter
Fresh chocolate milk during the season showed positive results overall said Shim
Athletes who drank the milk compared to those who did not scored higher after
the season than before it started specifically in the areas ofverbal and visual
memory
Football players were tested before the season after concussions and post-season
Dropbox Download high-quality Fifth Quarter Fresh videos photos and logos (including those shown below) via Mtechs public Dropbox folder
Fifth Quarter Fresh bottle
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
HEALTHNEWSREVIEW SCIENCE~US BAD SCIENCE
The University of Maryland Has a Burgeoning Chocolate-Mi lk Concussion Scandal on Its Hands
Mill 11ifoflI
Why wont the University of Maryland talk about By Jesse Slngal WFollow JesseS1119althe chocolate milkconcussion study it was so
January20 2016eager to promote lt 103pm
roSTEDBY CATEGORIES TAGS 5 SharesHealth care journalism News chocolate milk concussions
releases University o f Marvland
D Sharbull 12k
EJ rweet 363
Bl Sharo
Editors note In response toconcerns first raised by HealthNewsRevieworg in a news release review and
the following blog post the UniversityofMaryland has announced it is conducting an investigation into pound11 Sharamp
the study at the centerof this controversy Jll Email
Why did the University of Maryland issue multiple news releases about a health research project Photo- 11stration Photo Pa idl KloloCraaUve Coffmon~ and then decline to talk about it Thats just one of the questions piling up about research On December 22 the University of Maryland published a remarkable involving high school football players
press release about some research it had conducted According to theconcussions and a brand of chocolate milk release a study conducted by a professor at the UMD School of Public
It started routinely I was asked by Health had shown that a product called Fifth Quarter Fresh - basically a HealthNewsRevieworg to take the first look at a fancy fortified chocolate milk - helped high school football players news release from the University of Maryland improve their cognitive and motor function over the course ofa season Concussion-Related Measures Improved In
even after experiencing concussions High School Football Players Who Drank New
Chocolate Mllk UM D Study Shows read the Given the current focus on youth concussions its no surprise that this
headline The lead went further claiming not just an association but that the milk was responsib le news traveled fast and that the claim appears to have benefited the company in question Motivated by what appeared to be sturdy scientific
WJhealthnewsrevieworg categorynews-releases-2 gh~protein chocolate m i lk helped high school football players ymagcomsclenceofus
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Marc Hauser
bull Studied cognitive evolution in primates
bull Found guilty of 8 counts of research misconduct in 2010
bull Harvard placed him on administrative leave he later resigned
Dipak K Das
bull Studied resveratrol bull Found guilty by
UCONN of 145 instances of Research Misconduct
bull Case began as an anonymous tip in 2008
Dong-Pyou Han
bull HIVAIDS researcher bull Added human HIV
antibodies to rabbit blood
bull The scam went on for years the investigator resigned from IA State in Oct 2013
bull Sentenced to 57 months in prison
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
The Poehlman case running away from the truth
John E Dahlberf and Christian C Mahlers US Department of Health amp Human Services Office of Research Integrity 5 US Depanment of Health amp Human Services Office ofthe General Counsel
Keywords scientific misconduct lifetime debarment criminal fraud gerontology research menopause transition
ABSTRACT Eric T Poehlman PhD was an internationally recognized tenured professor at the University ofVermont (UVM) in Burlington when in October 2000 a junior member ofPoehlman s laboratory became convinced that he had altered data from a study on aging volunteers from the Burlington area This suspicion developed into one ofthe most significant cases ofscientific misconduct in the history ofthe US Department ofHealth andHuman Services (HHS) Office ofResearch Integrity (ORI) launching a US Department ofJustice (DOJ) civil and criminal fraud investigation and eventually to a much publicized guilty plea andfelony conviction In the end Dr Poehlman admitted to 54 findings ofscientific misconduct made by the UVM and ORI agreed to retract or correct ten ofhis publications and to exclude himself from federal procurement and nonprocurement transactions for life The United States Governments handling of this case was distinguished by a highly cooperative approach that integrated the resources ofthe US Attorneys Office for the District of Vermont (USAO) and both ORI and the Office ofthe Inspector General (OIG) in HHS in the common goal ofprosecuting research fraud
bull The content of this article represents the personal views of the authors and does not express the opinion or policy ofDHHS or its components
A paper on this topic was presented at the 6th International Bioethics Conference on the subject of The Responsible Conduct ofBasic and Clinical Research held in Warsaw Poland 3-4 June 2005
Addresses for correspondence John E Dahlberg PhD Senior Investigator Division of Investigative Oversight Office ofResearch Integrity US Department of Health amp Human Services Tower Oaks Bldg Suite 750 Rockville Maryland 20852 USA email jdahlbergosophsdhhsgov
Christian C Mahler JD Senior Anomey Office of the General Counsel Public Health Division US Department of Health amp Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Suite 4A-53 Parklawn Bldg Rockville Maryland 20857 USA email cmahlerpscgov
1353-3452 2006 Published by Opragcn Publications hupwwwopragencouk
Science and Engineering Ethics Volume I 2 Issue I 2006 157
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bullii~ M h MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE =Q
middotmiddot-Iv~ _ tee - AM PATHS FORMARYLAND ENTREPRENEUR ampINNOVATORS JC$
UPDATE This press release refers to study results that are preliminary and have not been subjected to the peer review scientific process
COLLEGE PARK Md - Fifth Quarter Fresh a new high-protein
chocolate milk helped high school football players improve their
cognitive and motor function over the course of a season even
after experiencing concussions a new preliminary University of
Maryland study shows
The study funded through the Maryland Industrial Partnerships program and
conducted byJae Kur Shim a professor of kinesiology in the School of Public Health
followed 474 football players from seven high schools in Western Maryland
throughout the fall 2014 season
High school football players regardless of concussions who drank Fifth Qurter
Fresh chocolate milk during the season showed positive results overall said Shim
Athletes who drank the milk compared to those who did not scored higher after
the season than before it started specifically in the areas ofverbal and visual
memory
Football players were tested before the season after concussions and post-season
Dropbox Download high-quality Fifth Quarter Fresh videos photos and logos (including those shown below) via Mtechs public Dropbox folder
Fifth Quarter Fresh bottle
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
HEALTHNEWSREVIEW SCIENCE~US BAD SCIENCE
The University of Maryland Has a Burgeoning Chocolate-Mi lk Concussion Scandal on Its Hands
Mill 11ifoflI
Why wont the University of Maryland talk about By Jesse Slngal WFollow JesseS1119althe chocolate milkconcussion study it was so
January20 2016eager to promote lt 103pm
roSTEDBY CATEGORIES TAGS 5 SharesHealth care journalism News chocolate milk concussions
releases University o f Marvland
D Sharbull 12k
EJ rweet 363
Bl Sharo
Editors note In response toconcerns first raised by HealthNewsRevieworg in a news release review and
the following blog post the UniversityofMaryland has announced it is conducting an investigation into pound11 Sharamp
the study at the centerof this controversy Jll Email
Why did the University of Maryland issue multiple news releases about a health research project Photo- 11stration Photo Pa idl KloloCraaUve Coffmon~ and then decline to talk about it Thats just one of the questions piling up about research On December 22 the University of Maryland published a remarkable involving high school football players
press release about some research it had conducted According to theconcussions and a brand of chocolate milk release a study conducted by a professor at the UMD School of Public
It started routinely I was asked by Health had shown that a product called Fifth Quarter Fresh - basically a HealthNewsRevieworg to take the first look at a fancy fortified chocolate milk - helped high school football players news release from the University of Maryland improve their cognitive and motor function over the course ofa season Concussion-Related Measures Improved In
even after experiencing concussions High School Football Players Who Drank New
Chocolate Mllk UM D Study Shows read the Given the current focus on youth concussions its no surprise that this
headline The lead went further claiming not just an association but that the milk was responsib le news traveled fast and that the claim appears to have benefited the company in question Motivated by what appeared to be sturdy scientific
WJhealthnewsrevieworg categorynews-releases-2 gh~protein chocolate m i lk helped high school football players ymagcomsclenceofus
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Dipak K Das
bull Studied resveratrol bull Found guilty by
UCONN of 145 instances of Research Misconduct
bull Case began as an anonymous tip in 2008
Dong-Pyou Han
bull HIVAIDS researcher bull Added human HIV
antibodies to rabbit blood
bull The scam went on for years the investigator resigned from IA State in Oct 2013
bull Sentenced to 57 months in prison
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
The Poehlman case running away from the truth
John E Dahlberf and Christian C Mahlers US Department of Health amp Human Services Office of Research Integrity 5 US Depanment of Health amp Human Services Office ofthe General Counsel
Keywords scientific misconduct lifetime debarment criminal fraud gerontology research menopause transition
ABSTRACT Eric T Poehlman PhD was an internationally recognized tenured professor at the University ofVermont (UVM) in Burlington when in October 2000 a junior member ofPoehlman s laboratory became convinced that he had altered data from a study on aging volunteers from the Burlington area This suspicion developed into one ofthe most significant cases ofscientific misconduct in the history ofthe US Department ofHealth andHuman Services (HHS) Office ofResearch Integrity (ORI) launching a US Department ofJustice (DOJ) civil and criminal fraud investigation and eventually to a much publicized guilty plea andfelony conviction In the end Dr Poehlman admitted to 54 findings ofscientific misconduct made by the UVM and ORI agreed to retract or correct ten ofhis publications and to exclude himself from federal procurement and nonprocurement transactions for life The United States Governments handling of this case was distinguished by a highly cooperative approach that integrated the resources ofthe US Attorneys Office for the District of Vermont (USAO) and both ORI and the Office ofthe Inspector General (OIG) in HHS in the common goal ofprosecuting research fraud
bull The content of this article represents the personal views of the authors and does not express the opinion or policy ofDHHS or its components
A paper on this topic was presented at the 6th International Bioethics Conference on the subject of The Responsible Conduct ofBasic and Clinical Research held in Warsaw Poland 3-4 June 2005
Addresses for correspondence John E Dahlberg PhD Senior Investigator Division of Investigative Oversight Office ofResearch Integrity US Department of Health amp Human Services Tower Oaks Bldg Suite 750 Rockville Maryland 20852 USA email jdahlbergosophsdhhsgov
Christian C Mahler JD Senior Anomey Office of the General Counsel Public Health Division US Department of Health amp Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Suite 4A-53 Parklawn Bldg Rockville Maryland 20857 USA email cmahlerpscgov
1353-3452 2006 Published by Opragcn Publications hupwwwopragencouk
Science and Engineering Ethics Volume I 2 Issue I 2006 157
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bullii~ M h MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE =Q
middotmiddot-Iv~ _ tee - AM PATHS FORMARYLAND ENTREPRENEUR ampINNOVATORS JC$
UPDATE This press release refers to study results that are preliminary and have not been subjected to the peer review scientific process
COLLEGE PARK Md - Fifth Quarter Fresh a new high-protein
chocolate milk helped high school football players improve their
cognitive and motor function over the course of a season even
after experiencing concussions a new preliminary University of
Maryland study shows
The study funded through the Maryland Industrial Partnerships program and
conducted byJae Kur Shim a professor of kinesiology in the School of Public Health
followed 474 football players from seven high schools in Western Maryland
throughout the fall 2014 season
High school football players regardless of concussions who drank Fifth Qurter
Fresh chocolate milk during the season showed positive results overall said Shim
Athletes who drank the milk compared to those who did not scored higher after
the season than before it started specifically in the areas ofverbal and visual
memory
Football players were tested before the season after concussions and post-season
Dropbox Download high-quality Fifth Quarter Fresh videos photos and logos (including those shown below) via Mtechs public Dropbox folder
Fifth Quarter Fresh bottle
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
HEALTHNEWSREVIEW SCIENCE~US BAD SCIENCE
The University of Maryland Has a Burgeoning Chocolate-Mi lk Concussion Scandal on Its Hands
Mill 11ifoflI
Why wont the University of Maryland talk about By Jesse Slngal WFollow JesseS1119althe chocolate milkconcussion study it was so
January20 2016eager to promote lt 103pm
roSTEDBY CATEGORIES TAGS 5 SharesHealth care journalism News chocolate milk concussions
releases University o f Marvland
D Sharbull 12k
EJ rweet 363
Bl Sharo
Editors note In response toconcerns first raised by HealthNewsRevieworg in a news release review and
the following blog post the UniversityofMaryland has announced it is conducting an investigation into pound11 Sharamp
the study at the centerof this controversy Jll Email
Why did the University of Maryland issue multiple news releases about a health research project Photo- 11stration Photo Pa idl KloloCraaUve Coffmon~ and then decline to talk about it Thats just one of the questions piling up about research On December 22 the University of Maryland published a remarkable involving high school football players
press release about some research it had conducted According to theconcussions and a brand of chocolate milk release a study conducted by a professor at the UMD School of Public
It started routinely I was asked by Health had shown that a product called Fifth Quarter Fresh - basically a HealthNewsRevieworg to take the first look at a fancy fortified chocolate milk - helped high school football players news release from the University of Maryland improve their cognitive and motor function over the course ofa season Concussion-Related Measures Improved In
even after experiencing concussions High School Football Players Who Drank New
Chocolate Mllk UM D Study Shows read the Given the current focus on youth concussions its no surprise that this
headline The lead went further claiming not just an association but that the milk was responsib le news traveled fast and that the claim appears to have benefited the company in question Motivated by what appeared to be sturdy scientific
WJhealthnewsrevieworg categorynews-releases-2 gh~protein chocolate m i lk helped high school football players ymagcomsclenceofus
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Dong-Pyou Han
bull HIVAIDS researcher bull Added human HIV
antibodies to rabbit blood
bull The scam went on for years the investigator resigned from IA State in Oct 2013
bull Sentenced to 57 months in prison
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
The Poehlman case running away from the truth
John E Dahlberf and Christian C Mahlers US Department of Health amp Human Services Office of Research Integrity 5 US Depanment of Health amp Human Services Office ofthe General Counsel
Keywords scientific misconduct lifetime debarment criminal fraud gerontology research menopause transition
ABSTRACT Eric T Poehlman PhD was an internationally recognized tenured professor at the University ofVermont (UVM) in Burlington when in October 2000 a junior member ofPoehlman s laboratory became convinced that he had altered data from a study on aging volunteers from the Burlington area This suspicion developed into one ofthe most significant cases ofscientific misconduct in the history ofthe US Department ofHealth andHuman Services (HHS) Office ofResearch Integrity (ORI) launching a US Department ofJustice (DOJ) civil and criminal fraud investigation and eventually to a much publicized guilty plea andfelony conviction In the end Dr Poehlman admitted to 54 findings ofscientific misconduct made by the UVM and ORI agreed to retract or correct ten ofhis publications and to exclude himself from federal procurement and nonprocurement transactions for life The United States Governments handling of this case was distinguished by a highly cooperative approach that integrated the resources ofthe US Attorneys Office for the District of Vermont (USAO) and both ORI and the Office ofthe Inspector General (OIG) in HHS in the common goal ofprosecuting research fraud
bull The content of this article represents the personal views of the authors and does not express the opinion or policy ofDHHS or its components
A paper on this topic was presented at the 6th International Bioethics Conference on the subject of The Responsible Conduct ofBasic and Clinical Research held in Warsaw Poland 3-4 June 2005
Addresses for correspondence John E Dahlberg PhD Senior Investigator Division of Investigative Oversight Office ofResearch Integrity US Department of Health amp Human Services Tower Oaks Bldg Suite 750 Rockville Maryland 20852 USA email jdahlbergosophsdhhsgov
Christian C Mahler JD Senior Anomey Office of the General Counsel Public Health Division US Department of Health amp Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Suite 4A-53 Parklawn Bldg Rockville Maryland 20857 USA email cmahlerpscgov
1353-3452 2006 Published by Opragcn Publications hupwwwopragencouk
Science and Engineering Ethics Volume I 2 Issue I 2006 157
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bullii~ M h MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE =Q
middotmiddot-Iv~ _ tee - AM PATHS FORMARYLAND ENTREPRENEUR ampINNOVATORS JC$
UPDATE This press release refers to study results that are preliminary and have not been subjected to the peer review scientific process
COLLEGE PARK Md - Fifth Quarter Fresh a new high-protein
chocolate milk helped high school football players improve their
cognitive and motor function over the course of a season even
after experiencing concussions a new preliminary University of
Maryland study shows
The study funded through the Maryland Industrial Partnerships program and
conducted byJae Kur Shim a professor of kinesiology in the School of Public Health
followed 474 football players from seven high schools in Western Maryland
throughout the fall 2014 season
High school football players regardless of concussions who drank Fifth Qurter
Fresh chocolate milk during the season showed positive results overall said Shim
Athletes who drank the milk compared to those who did not scored higher after
the season than before it started specifically in the areas ofverbal and visual
memory
Football players were tested before the season after concussions and post-season
Dropbox Download high-quality Fifth Quarter Fresh videos photos and logos (including those shown below) via Mtechs public Dropbox folder
Fifth Quarter Fresh bottle
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
HEALTHNEWSREVIEW SCIENCE~US BAD SCIENCE
The University of Maryland Has a Burgeoning Chocolate-Mi lk Concussion Scandal on Its Hands
Mill 11ifoflI
Why wont the University of Maryland talk about By Jesse Slngal WFollow JesseS1119althe chocolate milkconcussion study it was so
January20 2016eager to promote lt 103pm
roSTEDBY CATEGORIES TAGS 5 SharesHealth care journalism News chocolate milk concussions
releases University o f Marvland
D Sharbull 12k
EJ rweet 363
Bl Sharo
Editors note In response toconcerns first raised by HealthNewsRevieworg in a news release review and
the following blog post the UniversityofMaryland has announced it is conducting an investigation into pound11 Sharamp
the study at the centerof this controversy Jll Email
Why did the University of Maryland issue multiple news releases about a health research project Photo- 11stration Photo Pa idl KloloCraaUve Coffmon~ and then decline to talk about it Thats just one of the questions piling up about research On December 22 the University of Maryland published a remarkable involving high school football players
press release about some research it had conducted According to theconcussions and a brand of chocolate milk release a study conducted by a professor at the UMD School of Public
It started routinely I was asked by Health had shown that a product called Fifth Quarter Fresh - basically a HealthNewsRevieworg to take the first look at a fancy fortified chocolate milk - helped high school football players news release from the University of Maryland improve their cognitive and motor function over the course ofa season Concussion-Related Measures Improved In
even after experiencing concussions High School Football Players Who Drank New
Chocolate Mllk UM D Study Shows read the Given the current focus on youth concussions its no surprise that this
headline The lead went further claiming not just an association but that the milk was responsib le news traveled fast and that the claim appears to have benefited the company in question Motivated by what appeared to be sturdy scientific
WJhealthnewsrevieworg categorynews-releases-2 gh~protein chocolate m i lk helped high school football players ymagcomsclenceofus
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
The Poehlman case running away from the truth
John E Dahlberf and Christian C Mahlers US Department of Health amp Human Services Office of Research Integrity 5 US Depanment of Health amp Human Services Office ofthe General Counsel
Keywords scientific misconduct lifetime debarment criminal fraud gerontology research menopause transition
ABSTRACT Eric T Poehlman PhD was an internationally recognized tenured professor at the University ofVermont (UVM) in Burlington when in October 2000 a junior member ofPoehlman s laboratory became convinced that he had altered data from a study on aging volunteers from the Burlington area This suspicion developed into one ofthe most significant cases ofscientific misconduct in the history ofthe US Department ofHealth andHuman Services (HHS) Office ofResearch Integrity (ORI) launching a US Department ofJustice (DOJ) civil and criminal fraud investigation and eventually to a much publicized guilty plea andfelony conviction In the end Dr Poehlman admitted to 54 findings ofscientific misconduct made by the UVM and ORI agreed to retract or correct ten ofhis publications and to exclude himself from federal procurement and nonprocurement transactions for life The United States Governments handling of this case was distinguished by a highly cooperative approach that integrated the resources ofthe US Attorneys Office for the District of Vermont (USAO) and both ORI and the Office ofthe Inspector General (OIG) in HHS in the common goal ofprosecuting research fraud
bull The content of this article represents the personal views of the authors and does not express the opinion or policy ofDHHS or its components
A paper on this topic was presented at the 6th International Bioethics Conference on the subject of The Responsible Conduct ofBasic and Clinical Research held in Warsaw Poland 3-4 June 2005
Addresses for correspondence John E Dahlberg PhD Senior Investigator Division of Investigative Oversight Office ofResearch Integrity US Department of Health amp Human Services Tower Oaks Bldg Suite 750 Rockville Maryland 20852 USA email jdahlbergosophsdhhsgov
Christian C Mahler JD Senior Anomey Office of the General Counsel Public Health Division US Department of Health amp Human Services 5600 Fishers Lane Suite 4A-53 Parklawn Bldg Rockville Maryland 20857 USA email cmahlerpscgov
1353-3452 2006 Published by Opragcn Publications hupwwwopragencouk
Science and Engineering Ethics Volume I 2 Issue I 2006 157
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bullii~ M h MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE =Q
middotmiddot-Iv~ _ tee - AM PATHS FORMARYLAND ENTREPRENEUR ampINNOVATORS JC$
UPDATE This press release refers to study results that are preliminary and have not been subjected to the peer review scientific process
COLLEGE PARK Md - Fifth Quarter Fresh a new high-protein
chocolate milk helped high school football players improve their
cognitive and motor function over the course of a season even
after experiencing concussions a new preliminary University of
Maryland study shows
The study funded through the Maryland Industrial Partnerships program and
conducted byJae Kur Shim a professor of kinesiology in the School of Public Health
followed 474 football players from seven high schools in Western Maryland
throughout the fall 2014 season
High school football players regardless of concussions who drank Fifth Qurter
Fresh chocolate milk during the season showed positive results overall said Shim
Athletes who drank the milk compared to those who did not scored higher after
the season than before it started specifically in the areas ofverbal and visual
memory
Football players were tested before the season after concussions and post-season
Dropbox Download high-quality Fifth Quarter Fresh videos photos and logos (including those shown below) via Mtechs public Dropbox folder
Fifth Quarter Fresh bottle
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
HEALTHNEWSREVIEW SCIENCE~US BAD SCIENCE
The University of Maryland Has a Burgeoning Chocolate-Mi lk Concussion Scandal on Its Hands
Mill 11ifoflI
Why wont the University of Maryland talk about By Jesse Slngal WFollow JesseS1119althe chocolate milkconcussion study it was so
January20 2016eager to promote lt 103pm
roSTEDBY CATEGORIES TAGS 5 SharesHealth care journalism News chocolate milk concussions
releases University o f Marvland
D Sharbull 12k
EJ rweet 363
Bl Sharo
Editors note In response toconcerns first raised by HealthNewsRevieworg in a news release review and
the following blog post the UniversityofMaryland has announced it is conducting an investigation into pound11 Sharamp
the study at the centerof this controversy Jll Email
Why did the University of Maryland issue multiple news releases about a health research project Photo- 11stration Photo Pa idl KloloCraaUve Coffmon~ and then decline to talk about it Thats just one of the questions piling up about research On December 22 the University of Maryland published a remarkable involving high school football players
press release about some research it had conducted According to theconcussions and a brand of chocolate milk release a study conducted by a professor at the UMD School of Public
It started routinely I was asked by Health had shown that a product called Fifth Quarter Fresh - basically a HealthNewsRevieworg to take the first look at a fancy fortified chocolate milk - helped high school football players news release from the University of Maryland improve their cognitive and motor function over the course ofa season Concussion-Related Measures Improved In
even after experiencing concussions High School Football Players Who Drank New
Chocolate Mllk UM D Study Shows read the Given the current focus on youth concussions its no surprise that this
headline The lead went further claiming not just an association but that the milk was responsib le news traveled fast and that the claim appears to have benefited the company in question Motivated by what appeared to be sturdy scientific
WJhealthnewsrevieworg categorynews-releases-2 gh~protein chocolate m i lk helped high school football players ymagcomsclenceofus
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bullii~ M h MARYLAND TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE =Q
middotmiddot-Iv~ _ tee - AM PATHS FORMARYLAND ENTREPRENEUR ampINNOVATORS JC$
UPDATE This press release refers to study results that are preliminary and have not been subjected to the peer review scientific process
COLLEGE PARK Md - Fifth Quarter Fresh a new high-protein
chocolate milk helped high school football players improve their
cognitive and motor function over the course of a season even
after experiencing concussions a new preliminary University of
Maryland study shows
The study funded through the Maryland Industrial Partnerships program and
conducted byJae Kur Shim a professor of kinesiology in the School of Public Health
followed 474 football players from seven high schools in Western Maryland
throughout the fall 2014 season
High school football players regardless of concussions who drank Fifth Qurter
Fresh chocolate milk during the season showed positive results overall said Shim
Athletes who drank the milk compared to those who did not scored higher after
the season than before it started specifically in the areas ofverbal and visual
memory
Football players were tested before the season after concussions and post-season
Dropbox Download high-quality Fifth Quarter Fresh videos photos and logos (including those shown below) via Mtechs public Dropbox folder
Fifth Quarter Fresh bottle
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
HEALTHNEWSREVIEW SCIENCE~US BAD SCIENCE
The University of Maryland Has a Burgeoning Chocolate-Mi lk Concussion Scandal on Its Hands
Mill 11ifoflI
Why wont the University of Maryland talk about By Jesse Slngal WFollow JesseS1119althe chocolate milkconcussion study it was so
January20 2016eager to promote lt 103pm
roSTEDBY CATEGORIES TAGS 5 SharesHealth care journalism News chocolate milk concussions
releases University o f Marvland
D Sharbull 12k
EJ rweet 363
Bl Sharo
Editors note In response toconcerns first raised by HealthNewsRevieworg in a news release review and
the following blog post the UniversityofMaryland has announced it is conducting an investigation into pound11 Sharamp
the study at the centerof this controversy Jll Email
Why did the University of Maryland issue multiple news releases about a health research project Photo- 11stration Photo Pa idl KloloCraaUve Coffmon~ and then decline to talk about it Thats just one of the questions piling up about research On December 22 the University of Maryland published a remarkable involving high school football players
press release about some research it had conducted According to theconcussions and a brand of chocolate milk release a study conducted by a professor at the UMD School of Public
It started routinely I was asked by Health had shown that a product called Fifth Quarter Fresh - basically a HealthNewsRevieworg to take the first look at a fancy fortified chocolate milk - helped high school football players news release from the University of Maryland improve their cognitive and motor function over the course ofa season Concussion-Related Measures Improved In
even after experiencing concussions High School Football Players Who Drank New
Chocolate Mllk UM D Study Shows read the Given the current focus on youth concussions its no surprise that this
headline The lead went further claiming not just an association but that the milk was responsib le news traveled fast and that the claim appears to have benefited the company in question Motivated by what appeared to be sturdy scientific
WJhealthnewsrevieworg categorynews-releases-2 gh~protein chocolate m i lk helped high school football players ymagcomsclenceofus
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
HEALTHNEWSREVIEW SCIENCE~US BAD SCIENCE
The University of Maryland Has a Burgeoning Chocolate-Mi lk Concussion Scandal on Its Hands
Mill 11ifoflI
Why wont the University of Maryland talk about By Jesse Slngal WFollow JesseS1119althe chocolate milkconcussion study it was so
January20 2016eager to promote lt 103pm
roSTEDBY CATEGORIES TAGS 5 SharesHealth care journalism News chocolate milk concussions
releases University o f Marvland
D Sharbull 12k
EJ rweet 363
Bl Sharo
Editors note In response toconcerns first raised by HealthNewsRevieworg in a news release review and
the following blog post the UniversityofMaryland has announced it is conducting an investigation into pound11 Sharamp
the study at the centerof this controversy Jll Email
Why did the University of Maryland issue multiple news releases about a health research project Photo- 11stration Photo Pa idl KloloCraaUve Coffmon~ and then decline to talk about it Thats just one of the questions piling up about research On December 22 the University of Maryland published a remarkable involving high school football players
press release about some research it had conducted According to theconcussions and a brand of chocolate milk release a study conducted by a professor at the UMD School of Public
It started routinely I was asked by Health had shown that a product called Fifth Quarter Fresh - basically a HealthNewsRevieworg to take the first look at a fancy fortified chocolate milk - helped high school football players news release from the University of Maryland improve their cognitive and motor function over the course ofa season Concussion-Related Measures Improved In
even after experiencing concussions High School Football Players Who Drank New
Chocolate Mllk UM D Study Shows read the Given the current focus on youth concussions its no surprise that this
headline The lead went further claiming not just an association but that the milk was responsib le news traveled fast and that the claim appears to have benefited the company in question Motivated by what appeared to be sturdy scientific
WJhealthnewsrevieworg categorynews-releases-2 gh~protein chocolate m i lk helped high school football players ymagcomsclenceofus
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
64
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Wakefields article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent Clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this
FEATUREpn
Fiona Godleeeditor m chief BM) London UK fgodleebmjcom Jane Smith deputyeditor BMJ LondonUK Harvey Marcovitch associate editorBMJLondon UK
Cite this asBMJ c dot 101136bmic7452
damaging vaccine scare
Science is at once the most questioning and sceptical of activi ties and a lso the most trusting said Arnold Reiman former editor of the New England Journal ofMedicine in 1989 It is intensely sceptical about the possibility of error but totally trusting about the possibility of fraud 1 Never bas this been truer than of the 1998 Lancet paper that implied a link between the measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and a new syndrome ofautism and bowel disease
Authored by Andrew Wakefield and 12 others the papers scientific limitations were clear when it appeared in 19982
J As the ensuing vaccine scare took off critics quickly pointed out that the paper was a small case series with no controls linked three common conditions and
relied on parental recall and beliefs4 Over the following decade epidemiological studies consistently found no evishydence of a link between the MMR vaccine and autism5middot8
By the Lime the paper was finally retracted 12 years later9
after forensic dissection at the General Medical Councils (GMC) longest ever fitness to practise hearing 10few people could deny that it was fatally flawed both scientifically and ethically But it has taken the diligent scepticism ofone man standing outside medicine and science to show that the paper was in fact an elaborate fraud
In a series ofarticles starting this week and seven years after first looking into the MMR scare journalist Brian Deer now shows the extent ofWakefields fraud and how itwas perpetrated Drawing on interviews documents and data
BMJ 18 JANUARY 2011 IVOLUME 342
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Office of Research Integrity
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
What the RIO does
sect The RIO is responsible for seeing to it that the MSU Procedures Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities are carried out in an unbiased confidential and professional manner
sect Required for any institution seeking and accepting federal funding (42 CFR 93)
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY I Research Integrity Off icer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Funding Collaboration Compliancemiddot Commercialization Pollclesmiddot Resources middot Events ampTraining middot Unltii
Home
About
Authorship
Sample Agreement
Federal Agencies
Research Misconduct Procdures (PDF
Research Data
Resources
Contact Us
Research Integrity Officer
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) receives and manages Allegations of
Misconduct in Research within the MSU community Research Misconduct
includes Plagiarism Fabrication Falsification and other research activities
that seriously deviate from accepted practices in the research community
The Michigan State University policy can be found in the Procedures
Concerning Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Creative Activities
The RIO also manages authorship and data disputes according to MSUs
Authorship and Research Data Management Control and Access
guidelines In this role the RIO provides advice to administrators faculty
and students in best authorship and data management practices
Please feel free to contact us if you have questionsconcerns about any
research integrity matter Our discussions can remain confidential
James M Pivamlk PhD Research Integrity Officer 107 Olds Hall 408 W Circle Drive East Lansing Michigan 48824 Phone (517) 432-6698 Email riomsuedu
( Search )
Announcements MSU bloggers post on Spartan Ideas Spartan Ideas is an MSU website maintained by MSU Libraries and the Office of the Vice President ror Research and Graduate Studies It is designed to showcase a continuously growing selection or MSUs faculty student and staff biogs A team of MSU librarians curatesmiddot this collection chooslng more
1 2
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
PROCEDURES CONCERNING ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT lN
RESEARCH AND CREATIVE ACTIVITIES
19 June 2009
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
The role of the RIO
sect The RIO shall coordinate implementation of these Procedures and shall be responsible for their fair and impartial administration The RIO shall not be an advocate for the Complainant or the Respondent
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Question
sect Is the RIO the most thankless job at Michigan State University
sect Yes
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Question
sect Is the RIO the most despised entity at Michigan State University
sect No
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
So who is
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
What exactly is ldquoResearch Misconductrdquo
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Research Misconduct (Michigan State)
Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism orany other practice that Seriously Deviatesfrom practices commonly accepted in thediscipline or in the academic and researchcommunities generally in proposingperforming reviewing or reporting Researchand Creative Activities Misconduct does not include appropriative practices in theCreative Arts insofar as they accord with accepted standards in the relevantdiscipline Misconduct does not include honest error or honest differences in the interpretation or judgment of Research data
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
It doesnrsquot matter what I think the evidence says everything
Mac Taylor CSI New York
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
How does the process begin
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Meet definition sect Any evidence
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
My most important phrase
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
My most important phrase
sect ldquoit could berdquo
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Misconduct Process
sect Allegation sect Complainant(s) sect Respondent(s)
sect Preliminary Assessment (by me) sect Inquiry Panel sect Investigative Committee
sect Exoneration or Finding
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Fabrication
sect Fabrication is making up data or results and recording or reporting them
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Falsification
sect Falsification is manipulating research materialsequipment or processes or changing or omittingdata or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ORI cases with Questioned Images
I so I 10 () 60
~ 50
40
30
I 20
l 10 OLm___
11-IZ II-lit bull-II 17-11 IMI 11-12 U-1bull ft-II 17-11
2-Year Reporting Period (1989-90 to 2007-0BJ
fiPI 1 C~ fomWly opened by ORI tbat inrohre questio ed images
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Plagiarism
sect Plagiarism is appropriation of another persons ideas processes results or words without giving appropriate credit
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
sect Pyramus and Thisbe in classical mythology youth and maiden of Babylon whose parentsopposed their marriage Their homes adjoined and they conversed through a crevice in the dividing wallOn a night when they had arranged to meet at thetomb of Ninus Thisbe who was the first at the trysting place was frightened by a lion with jawsbloody from its prey As she fled she dropped her mantle which was seized by the lion When Pyramuscame the torn and bloody mantle convinced him thatshe had been slain He killed himself and Thisbe returning took her own life with his sword The white fruit of a mulberry tree that stood at the trysting placewas dyed red with Pyramus blood and the fruit was ever after the color of blood
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
bull Written by Ovid bull Between 5-3 BC
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull William Shakespeare bull 1595
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Does Pyramus and Thisbe remind you of anything
bull Arthur Laurents bull 1957
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
sect Accusations of plagiarism should be judged individually taking into account the actual damage done to the original author and current copyright holder and whether or not the alleged theft actually has any artistic merits in its own right
sect Feb 27 2007 sect thunderpeel2001blogspotcom sect Posted by Johnny Walker
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
sect A judgment of plagiarism requires that the copying besides being deceitful in the sense of misleading the intended readers induces reliance by them By this I mean that the reader does something because he thinks the plagiarizing work original that he would not have done had he known the truth
sect Richard A Posner sect The Little Book of Plagiarism (Pantheon Books NY) 2007 sect Page 19
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
------------
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1-MM Plttamll PfrD~ MCSAI
DlplwtnMtsrl~tnJEpdlrlftiotigy -Entl-g~ --shyTllomHMluM011llgtMCSM
lltOWSloltbull-C -1iltQmSWc~
llWlrd-Slllbd O MCSM___~__ IMktL~MCSM
Fittt~PNMIMf ~OlampttlM MktfJtlltldHttlllSatncfs
11rt~dhb htdIMTED KINGDOM
~WHelftlraquoampMPHMCSM Fhl~sldtnf
Dftwl~~~dftnntaeeltCNbloopt
shyM _Pill)R0 MCSM Slcond~
~rJ~MdE~SciMt cqorJHlIWtdit~
OgtMCNtnNAOr11MCSM
Stconct~
JlJ)Dwfllrnt-0MCSM
~dEwottbu -shy(HolntyoSociftCildrll
CSdlClrdllf frKdw~frttldtfM
ACSU~C
ACSiV ffMl1tt)itldtt1cin ~24middotil2010
l ~
ACSMll fI HMM amp~ S-iramp~
An1middot1Q 2010 r
ACSMJ578AM1i111A1tlaquo9 Md --CongnfJOllbftJMs
JtMlS2010
SltttlAddrtu 4(11 WtJ 111111 SI - N ~2CH233USA
M1wg AddM$PO Bo1440 --4QD844bullUSA
Ttdeg 1317)637-12(11) FAX 4311)630811 MMl IC$tllaquo~ Ftdtrll lD Nlllblr 23-839C952
fotlldlaquoJ it 1954
AMERICAN COLLEGE of SPORTS MEDICINEe Mbull811$taM- bull 1r lfl0 of~ Mt_bull ft ICien5lc topJI
IL _fWlbulldlltBtllCal~dtaemse~ 1fldspart1fllllttr
September 11 2009
President Barack Obama The White House Washington DC 20500
Dear Mr President
On behalf of the more than 35000 members and certttied professionals of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) I am writing to thank you for highlighting the importance of covering routine checkups and preventive care like mammograms and colonoscopies in your speech on Wednesday Sept 9 2009 before a joint session of Congress
However we believe that prevention and wellness is much more than just clinical preventive services and should include initiatives designed to encourage healthy lifestyles including increasing physical activity and improving nutrition As you know five of the costliest illnesses and conditions - cancer cardiovascular disease diabetes lung disease and strokes - can be prevented through a combination of healthy lifestyles and essential screenings
ACSM is the largest sports medicine and exercise science organization in the world Its members have applied their knowledge training and dedication in sports medicine and exercise science to promote healthier lifestyles for people around the globe In addition to improving the health of citizens worldwide our members research has also proven that fitness increases worker productivity and job performance
You may be interested to know that for more than two years ACSM has been spearheading an innovative program to prevent illness and disease The Exercise is Medicine program launched in conjunction with the American Medical Association is designed to encourage Americas patients to incorporate physical activity and exercise into their daily routine Exercise is Medicine specffically calls on doctors to prescribe exercise to their patients which is the kind of initiative that will help you achieve your goal of stepping up efforts to advance the cause of healthy living
We thank you once again for your commitment to providing leadership on this issue and we look forward to working with you to ensure that healthy lifestyles including increased physical activity and better nutrition play a much more prominent role in the future than it has in the past
Sincerely
j-ffeeJ James M Pivarnik FACSM President American College of Sports Medicine
cc Nancy-Ann DeParle White House Office of Health Reform Kathleen Sebelius HHS Secretary
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Standard of Determination for Research Misconduct
sect There be a significant departure from acceptedpractices of the relevant research communityand
sect The misconduct was committed intentionally knowingly or recklessly and
sect The allegation be proven by a preponderanceof the evidence
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
I tend not to believe people People lie The evidence doesnt lie
Gil Grissom CSI
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Serious Deviation from Common Practice
sect Stealing destroying or damaging theresearch property of others with the intent toalter the research record
sect Listing someonersquos name as an author on a publication without hisher knowledge orpermission
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Serious Deviation from Common Practice sect Misrepresenting background information including
biographical data citation of publications or status of manuscripts
sect Abuse of confidentiality taking or releasing the ideas or data of others which were shared with the legitimate expectation of confidentiality eg stealing ideas from others grant proposals award applications or manuscripts for publication when one is a reviewer for granting agencies or journals
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Question
sect Do we deal with any other bad things
sect Sometimes
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
loNE WAY )
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
bull ldquoUnacceptable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct but that violate applicable laws regulations or other governmental requirements or University rules or policies of which the Respondent had received notice or of which the Respondent reasonably should have been aware for proposing performing reviewing or reporting Research or Creative Activities
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
What about individuals who are always on the edge
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
bull ldquoQuestionable Research Practicesrdquo means practices that do not constitute Misconduct or Unacceptable Research Practices but that require attention because they could erode confidence in the integrity of Research or Creative Activities
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Question
sect What percentage of potential allegations coming to our office is associated with some sort of previous conflict betweenamong the parties involved
sect ~ 90
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Whatrsquos the Score
sect We average about 6-10 new cases per year
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Whatrsquos the Score
sect Every case undergoes a Preliminary Assessment sect Approximately 13 cases end there
sect Of the 23 of cases that move on sect 13 end with an Inquiry sect 23 move on to a full Investigation
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Causes of research misconduct (Davis et al 2007)
sect Individual sect Situational sect Organizational sect Structural sect Cultural
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Recent Cases
sect Hypothetical of course
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Recent Cases
sect Falsificationfabrication of data by a student sect Complainant was faculty and students
sect Lab supervision could have been better
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism in a dissertation by a student sect Complainant was external to MSU
sect Dissertation committee may not have provided proper oversight
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Recent Cases
sect Serious Deviation and Plagiarism by a student sect Complainants were faculty members
sect Possible prior acts by Respondent drove the Allegation
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Recent Cases
sect Plagiarism by a faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Case complicated by ldquoagreementsrdquo made among administrators faculty member and student that are not clearly understood by all parties
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Recent Cases
sect Unacceptable Research Practices by faculty member sect Complainant was a student
sect Graduate Dean helped student secure another lab for doing the right thing
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
You can report anonymously
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
You can report anonymously
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
And now for something completely different
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
What Every Student Should Know About Authorship and Data Ownership
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Whose name goes where on the paper and whose data are they anyhow
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Rationale
sect Role of peer-reviewed research
sect Importance in faculty evaluations
sect Increasing level of collaborative efforts
sect Student education
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
The Future of Peer Reviewed Publishing
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Francis Crick and James Watson
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
James Watson and Francis Crick
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Acknowledgement
sect We are much indebted to Dr Jerry Donohuersquos constant advice and criticism especially on atomic disturbances We have also been stimulated by a knowledge of the general nature of the unpublished experimental results and ideas of Dr M H Wilkins Dr RE Franklin and their co-workers
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Maurice Wilkins
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Maurice Wilkins
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
So whatrsquos the problem
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Rosalind Franklin
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Rosalind Franklin
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
It was awfully Sure thing Crick nobel of
~-----
We wouldnt have W ilkins to get seen the double us a peek at helix without it Rosalinds X-ray Thanks for that photos of ONA Maurice eh what James
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
His-terB bull The Nobel Prize in Medicine 1962
Frands Hbullry Compton Crick
James Dewey Watson
Rosalind Franklin (Died of cancer 1958)
Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Did Rosalind Franklin get shafted
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
sect The author list should include all appropriate researchers and no others Authorship provides credit for a researcherrsquos contributions to a study and carries accountability The Nature journals do not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship but encourage transparency by publishing author contributions statements Nature journals editors are not in a position to investigate or adjudicate authorship disputes before or after publication Such disagreements if they cannot be resolved amongst authors should be brought up to the relevant institutional authority sect Nature 2014
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Who Qualifies for Authorship
bull Idea Person bull Data Collectors
ndash Paid vs Unpaid
bull Statistician bull Head of Lab bull Students bull Colleagues bull Relatives
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
sect To be an author each individual shall have contributed to the manuscript in at least two(2) of the following areas
sect Significant manuscript writer sect Significant manuscript reviewerreviser sect Concept and design sect Data acquisition sect Data analysis and interpretation sect Statistical expertise
sect Manuscripts with more than six (6) authors require justificationfor exceeding that number The Journal reserves the right to ask authors to reduce the number of authors
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
What about an abstract submission to a research meeting
Are the rules different
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
JAMA
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
1 Authorship Responsibility Criteria and Contributions Each author should meet all criteria below (A B C and D) and should indicate general and specific contributions by reading criteria A B C and D and checking the appropriate boxes
0 A I certify that bull the manuscript represents original and valid work and that neishy
ther this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content unshyder my authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere except as described in an attachment and copies of closely related manuscripts are provided and
bull if requested I will provide the data or will cooperate Fully in obtaining and providing the data on which the manuscript is based for examination by the editors or their assignees and
bull for papers with more than I author I agree to allow the corshyresponding author to serve as the primary correspondent with the editorial office to review the edited typescript and proof and to make decisions regarding release of information in the manushyscript to the media federal agencies or both or if I am the only author I wi II be the corresponding author and agree to serve in the roles described above 0 B l have given final approval of the submitted manuscript
C I have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for (check I of 2 below)
0 part of the content 0 the whole content
D To qualify for authorship you must check al least 1 box for each of the 3 categories of contributions listed below
Ihave made substantial contributions to the intellectual conshytent of the paper as described below l (check at least I of the 3 below) 0 conception and design 0 acquisition of data 0 analysis and interpretation of data 2 (check at least l of 2 below) 0 drafting of the manuscript 0 critical revision of the manuscript for important intelshy
lectual content 3 (check at least 1 below) 0 statistical analysis 0 obtaining funding 0 administrative technical or material support 0 supervision 0 no additional contributions 0 other (specify) _____________
Your Signature Date Signed
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
sect Participation that does not qualify for authorship includes
sect Data gathering sect Provision of financial or other support
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Jdegrnal ofAlhltlilt Training 200742(3)403-408 C by the National Alltletic Trainers Assoclauoo Inc original research shywww~oumalofalhlclictrainingorg
Bone Mineral Density in Collegiate Female Athletes Comparisons Among Sports Lanay M Mudd MS Willa Fornetti DO MS James M Pivarnik PhD
Michigan State University East Lansing Ml
Lanay M Mudd MS contributed to conception mid design analysis and interpretatio11 of the data and drafting critical revision and final approval of tile article Willa Fometti DO MS contributed to conception and design acquisition oftile data and drafting critical revision and final approbullal of till article James M Pivamik PhD contributed to conception and design acquisition and analysis and interpretation of tlie data and critical revision and final approval of tile article
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Any Limit on Number of Authors
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
IU Selected for n Viewpoint in Physics week cllling
PRL I03 251601(W09) P H YSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 18 DECEMBBR 2009
~ Aziniuthal Charged-Partidc 01rrclatiom and Posihle Lori~ Strong Parity Violation
B I Abclev8 M M Aggarwal19 Z Ahamrred A V Alakhvcrdyanl16 B D Andcrgtltll17 D Arkhipkin1
G S Avcrichev16 J Balewski21 0 Barannikova 8 LS Bamby2 S Baumgart51 DR Beavl 1 R Bellwieltl 49
1F Bcnldosso26 MJ BetanCltJurt2 1 RR Betlbull8 A Bhasin A K Bhati H Bichsel48 J Biclcik10 J Bielcikova1
B Biritz6 L C Bland I Bnzarov16 B E Bonner J Bouchet17 E Braidot A V Brnndin14 A Bridgeman1
E Bruna51 S Bueltmann18 T P Burton X Z Cai19 H Caines M Calderoo de la Barca Sanchez O C~ru D Cebm R Cendejalt6 M C Cervantebull41 Z Chajecki 17 P Chaloupka11 S ChattopadhyayH F Chen37 J H Chen17
J Y Chen J Cheng43 M Otcmcy9 A Chikanian1 K E Otoi31 W Chrhtie3 P Chung11 RF Cllrke41
M J M Codrington4 1 R Cortiss21 TM Comiicr49 MR Coscntinogt6 JG Cramer HJ Crawford 4 D Das S Dah11 M Daugherity41 L C De Silva49 T G Dcdovich16 M DcPhiltips1 AA Dcrevschikov31
41R Dcrrndi de Sowa 7 L Oidcnko1 P Djawolho41 V i)Lhordhadze1 SM Dogra X Dong20 J L Dmchenierg 4JE DrJpcr5 JC Dunlop1 M R Dutta Mazumdar46 LG Efinv 16 E Elhalhuti2 M Elnimr49 J Engela~e
G Eppley1 B Erazmugt40 M Esticnne40 L EunJO P Fachini3 R Fatemi J Fcdorisin 16 A Feng P Filip10
40E Finch51 V Fine Y Fisyak1 CA Gagliardi DR Gangadharan6 M S Ganti46 E J GarciamiddotSolis8 A GcromilSC6 F Gcuns15 V Ghazikhanian6 P Ghosh46 Y N Gorbunov9 A Gordon1 0 Grebcnyuk20 D Grosnick43 B c~ubc
41S M Guertin6 K S F F Guimaracs16 A Gupta15 N Guplll15 W Guryn 1 B Haag5 T J Hallmtr11 A Hamed J W Harris51 M Heinz S Heppelmann30 A Hirsch11 E H_jor~20 A_ M Hoffman21 G W Hoffmann 42 DJ Hofman8
R S Hollisbull HZ Huang6 TJ Humanic17 L Huo 41 G lgo6 A lordanova8 P Jacoigtlt20 W W Jacobs14 P Jakl11
C Jena11 F Jin19C L Joncs1 1 P G Jones1 JJoseph 17 E G Judd4 S Kalxrna40 K Kajimcxo42 K Kang41J Kflitan 11
K Kauderbull D Keanc17 A Kcehcchyan 16 D Keuler48 V Yu KhltXlyrev 31 D P Kikola20 J Kiryluk 20 A Khie~47
SR Klein 20 AG Knospc5 1 A KOCltJloski2 DD Koetke45 J Konzcr11 M Kopytine17 1 Koral~18 W Korsch 11
6L Kotchendau V Kouchpi~ 11 P KravLiOv 14 V I KraVliOv11 K Krucger1 M Krus10 L Kumar19 P Kur~di 3M AC Lamont1 JM Landgmf1 S LaPointe49 J Lauret3 A Lcbedev1 R Lcdnicky16 C-H Lee JH Lec
W Leight21 M J LeVine3 C Li17 N Lideg Y Li43 G Lin51 S J Lindenbaum 11 M A ua 17 F Liu H Liu 5 J Liu L Liu50 T L~ubicic1 W J Llope15 R S Longacre3 W A LOc1 Y Lu37 T Ludlan13 G L Ma19 Y G M19
D P MahnlXllra 1 R Majka 01 Mall LK Mango1rn R Manweiler S Mlletis17 C Markert42 H Mnsui1deg HS Matis20 Yu A Marulenko11 D McD01ald T S McShanc9 A Mcschanin31 R Milner21 N G MinlCV31
51 S Miodus-zcwski 41 A Mischke B Mohanty DA Morozov31 MG MunhozJ6 B K Nandi C Nanr1ltS 31 1T K Nayak46 JM NelMll2 P K Netmkanti1 M J Ng4 L V Nogach S B Nurushev G Odynice20 A Ogawa
H Okada V Okorokovu D Olson20 M Pacbr0 B S Pagc14 S K Pal Y Pandit17 Y Pancbrotsev16 T PMllak47
20T Pcitzmann26 V Pcrevonchikov3 C Perkins W Pcryt47 S C Phatak11 P Pile3 M Planinicdeg MA Ploskoo J Plulll 47 D Plyku 20 N Poljak A M PosktlD7er20 B VK S Potukuchi D Prindle C Pruneaubullbull N K Pruthi
P R_ Pujahari J PutChkc51 R_ Raniwala34 S Raniwala34 R_ L Ray 42 R_ Redwine21 R Reed5 A Ridigr H G Riuer20 JB Roberts 0V Rogachevskiy16 J L Rorrero A Rosc10 C Roy L Ruan M J RuSSlthcr R Sahoo40 S Sakai6 1 Saknjda20 T Sakuma11 S Salur20 J Sandweiss51 J Schambaeh42 RP Schannbcrg12
N Schmitmiddot1 J Scele21 J Segcr9 1 Selyuthcnkov14 Y Semen-idis1 P Seyboth E Shahaliev16 M Shao M Sharma49 SS Shideg X-H Shi39 E P Sicbtennann F Simon R N Singaraju46 M J Skoby N Smimov51
P Sorensen J Sowiruki14 HM Spinka 18 Srivastava12TDS Stani~laus43 D Sta1lk6 M Strikhano B Slringfellow31 AA P Suaidegt6 M C Suarezbull NL Subba17 M Swnbcra11 XM Sim Y Sun17 Z Sm19
B Surmw21 TJ M Symons20 A S1antode Toledo16 J Takahashi 7 A H Tang3 Z Tang L H Tarini9
T Tarnowsky23 D Thein 42 J H Thuma 20 J Tian39 A R Timmins S Timohenko D Tlllty11 M Tokuev16
1V N Tmn~ S Trcntalangc6 R E Tribble41 O D Tsai6 J Ulery T Ullrich D G Underwood G Van Bunn G van Nicuwenhuizcn11 J A Vanfossen Jr17 R Varma GM S Vasconcclos7 A N Vnsitiev F Videback1
YP Viyogi46 S Volrnl 16 S A Voloshin9 M Wad12 M Walker11 F Wang12G Wang6 H Wang23 J S ang19
17 Y 6Q Wang X Wang43 X L Wang Wang 41 G Webb18 JC WebbGD Wegttfall23 C Whinen Jr H Wicman20 S W Wissink14 R Win4 Y W1450 W Xic2 N XuQH Xu Y Xu17 Z Xu Y Yang 19 P Ye~ K Yip3 lmiddotK Yoon Q Yue41 M Zawisza7 H Zbroszczyk47 W Zhan19 S Zhang39 W M Zhang17 X P Zhang
6Y Zhang20ZP Zhang17 Y Zhao C Zhong19 J Zhou35 X Zhu41 R Zoulkamcev 1Y Zltlulkarnccva 16 and JX Zuo19
003 1-9007 CS 103(25)251601(7) 25 1601-1 copy 2009 The American Physicnl Society
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
sect httpwwwicmjeorg sect First met in Vancouver in 1978 sect Later became the ICMJE sect Developed a number of statements and
standards re manuscript submission sect Most recently revised in Oct 2014 sect One issue is authorship
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
sect According to ICMJE authorship should bebased on
1) substantial contributions to conception and design or acquisition of data or analysis and
interpretation of data 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for
important intellectual content 3) final approval of the version to be published 4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the
work in ensuring that questions related to theaccuracy or integrity of any part of the
work are appropriately investigated andresolved
Authors should meet conditions 123 and 4
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Additional info
sect Acquisition of funding collection of data orgeneral supervision of the research groupalone does not justify authorship
sect Each author should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility forappropriate portions of the content
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
What does MSU say
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Plillip Gtobullbulllaod IS
11 w deg9lngtfltSgtOlt ol-tM -wlndMtdllt1
-Untftrlt) ftbullnbtfg
~deg-middot 0Ugo ILllt IJ I
lonnclt tdllOf ol 11gtt Anhlwgt oflnlltmal
M-IM
rtlgtl8 Fonunk oltulYO tdltor ol U
degofttgt_CIM-olAnoclot andMju11ltt lngtIbullgtgtltgtlt ollllfCYMtdiltlnt and lJtWndwMtdl Clnttlt tht Northwlf1tmiddot
u-llf rtwibtltg Sltllool of- Ch1ugo IL
I-Ending Honorary Authorship CREDIT FOR SCIENTIFICRESEARCH CONTIUBUTIONS MUST BE CLEARlY AND APPROPRIATELY ASSIGNED 81 lhe llme or pubhc11Jon Thn 1k has bcCOOlC 1ncrcuingly comphClled blaquo1use or lhc number ofcbffcrcn1 labontlaquogtnC$ Ind cooulh()fS mvolbullCd m llWlY studies1be aood new1 is tlbullbullbull 11C1dcm1c in1111r111lons fondcn and publlhen are oxpltgtr1n1 new woya 10 clanfy otlnmiddot bohonbull and many pubhllihcfS now require dlSCl011un orspecific contnbuuom for scientific nulhorolup A1 pan of lhi1 effort 1111 cnucal 1ba111gt0 problem ofhonorary authonb1p be cffect1Cly ~ Accorltlbullna to a reltcnt rqxgtn honorary authors wrc 1noched 10 2S of rcocmb reporu IS or rev1 oruclc and 11 ored11orilb published 11bull major mcdic1l 1oon11b 1n 2008 I II is umc 10 end lhigt prac1ici
A ltUC 1utborissomeone who lwl madeaub11an1Jvc 1n1clklctuol con1nbu1Joo1 IObull Sludy ond rltbullrltgtnsible for a component or the Ork Honorary ou1honh1p v1ol1tc1 1h1S ccnshytral pnnc1plc Why lhen 1s 11 so frcqucnt7 lo some cs honorary authoh1p 1moun1JJ 10 cocnave 1ulhlttlttl11p 1n which 1 1tnior pc1son lnfonnbull bullJuniorcollcaauc U11t lhc ICllJOr pcnon mus1 be hlt1cd asan author even thouah bullhehe did llOI coruribute 1ubrilanshyu1lty- or It bullII to lhc wltll~ In olher cucbull lhc rnnc1pol 1nvc111111ornuy bulldJ the n1me of a rrominent se1c-nh~t 1n the field as ll gucJt author in an 111cmpc IO bool1 lhc paperbull choncc or publ1ltaUon lloth IYJICI of behavior hivc fraudulent obullpecll d1or11na lhc lt1h1col cuhure hot 11 central 10 1 hc11hy 1C1dcn11c enronment
To thscouraac honoruy 1uthonh1p 1nJ ensure apruopra1cc bullccou111abu11y fur publuhed lC$Ullgt many Jooroals have updated heir pohcico on 1u1honh1r 1or bullomc (mluding 1ltmiddot1~na) 11l au1horlt inubullI formally 1grcc IO be hsied abull 1uthon ltpec1fy 1heir con1r1buuoobull to thc monU1ltnr1 and tcrufy thII lhcy oppMc of1u tonicnt and 1ub1nbull1on to lhc ioumol Bui 11eicn11fic JOUnul could go even furlhCT by 1ddmg a bull~tcmcn1on1ulhorsh1p folms lhlt rcmu1do 1utborlof heir bulltltountabthbully in lhcCent ofchallenampts 10 lhc Crauy or intcanty of the worksuch11By bullianuia this bulltbulltcmcn1 I ncknowlcdamplt 1111 I toke crcd11 for the con1en1 of the publhcd k I al bullltIJKgtllbullUampbull 1lwu I 11 take resiions1b1h1y for 1hc work 1fq11cbulll10M lnJC in lhc fu1urc to 111 authcnuctty and crcd1bih1y Suchbull llllloshymcot would ~degfC llfa inn reminder Iha being mappropnntely llamped tu an author b OCllImiddot
live conquencc11fU1e uhs ire clllllletlyencd (lf retrac1cJ Research mshtullons should dcbullclop md promulgate clelt1r SIAtCnCnlgt 1n their reacanh
pohc1cs 1hout lhe lmponane ofuphold1na lt1h1col 14ndard 11f1ulholtgth1p hgtr ex11mplc Wahtngtoa University m St Lou15t defines both aucgtl ind gift 1utbonl11p research m11shycollduct hereby aua1 (hooonry tourtCI) ur flilC) autlll)f1lh1p defined iu 1Vbull1tlin11 au11or$h1p ou1of1pprccia11on or rcspec1 for an individual or 111 lho behcfthatpen Jt1ndmiddot IRJI oflhc lllnl Wiii UIOdegC lhc hkchhooJ ofpubhc1Uon crltdib1l11y ()I llltampIUS orlhe wortbullbull and ibulln 1u1honh1p i crOOu~ offered from a 1en~c ofobhp11on tnbu1c or dependence UIC coniot of on an1ic1pampled bcncf~ Ill lltl 1nd1vidu1J who llu notcontnlgtu1ed 10 the Ork f~ch 1nlt11tu11on ohould 11gt0 IJC(1fy IQ whom conccmt 1hould be d1rtltlbulld w1thou1 f ofretnbullon when1n author feels coerced 10 include an U1lppropna1c 1ulhor
11 Ibull incumbent on more-senior cooulhora 10 101lt1 in cdue111na 1heir collcoauca 1bou1 the proper bulltanduds tor aulho~p Bui nll sc1en1Lgtts llhould toke a stand 1pms1 coercive au1hor hip and rcfuoc to comply w11h 1uch bcbw1or In th woy 1tn1or ficulty and men bullors will ICrvc u role modds orbell pn1ct1Ccs remfoccina for moremiddotiuntor mvC1hpton lhc llllpotllncC orttlUnnamp lppropnntc IU1horgth1p I lonor1ry lutborYlp llllI no lonact be tolerated Conccrtcdeffort- by1nM11U11oiu bullulhor-lt andJ011m1b nrc oceltkd IO put1n C11d to tlua lnuduknl and uncthittl pr11Ct1cc
- Philip G1t~nlllnd and Phil I ~ontanaroso
10Ul~it lUH
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
ilttpllproltltISMtriHoi--- If lfbullslMtrlt4W_J J4lol61llJOtt) l~llP~-deg _
wwwac1eniemeg ltkI SCIEN CE VOL337 31 AUGUST2012 1019
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Quit whining itrsquos not a big deal
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari Dr David Baltimore
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Baltimore David
Baltimore David (bocircltimocircr ndashmur) [key] 1938ndash American microbiologist b New York City PhD Rockefeller Univ 1964 He conducted (1965ndash68) virology research at the Salk Institute before becoming a professor atMassachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972 In 1970 he and his wife Alice Huang discovered a virus caused by an enzyme that could transcribe DNAinto RNA He shared the 1975 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine withRenato Dulbecco and Howard Temin for his study on the connections betweenviruses and cancer
Appointed president of Rockefeller Univ in 1990 he resigned the next year after a scientific fraud scandal A paper he coauthored was said to contain fraudulent data from another author Dr Thereza Imanishi-Kari and Baltimore was criticized for his vehement defense of the paper despite the evidence In1996 an appeals panel overturned the verdict of the original investigatingoffice the federal Office of Scientific Integrity (now the Office of ResearchIntegrity) and Baltimore and Imanishi-Kari were exonerated In 1997 Baltimore was appointed president of the California Institute of Technology
See D J Kevles The Baltimore Case A Trial of Politics Science and Character (1998)The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th ed
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Contributorship
sect All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgments section Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help writing assistance or a department chair who provided only general support
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Questionhellip
sect Does (or should) being a member of a thesis or dissertation committee automatically qualify one for authorship
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Order Order
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Who Cares
sect Compendium of physical activities classificationof energy costs of human physical activities
sect Med Sci Sports Exerc 25 71-80 1993 sect Over 3800 Citations sect Ainsworth et al sect Ainsworth Haskell Leon Jacobs Montoye
Sallis Paffenbarger
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
American Psychological Association (APA) sect According to the 6th edition of the APA manual
The names of the authors should appear in the order of their contributions centered between the side marginsrdquo
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Authorship Order
sect The group should jointly make decisions aboutcontributorsauthors before submitting themanuscript for publication The corresponding authorguarantor should be prepared to explainthe presence and order of these individuals It is not the role of editors to make authorshipcontributorship decisions or to arbitrate conflicts related to authorship
sect (ICMJE 2008)
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Authorship Order
sect No proposal for more informative andstandardized systems for ordering the namesof authors has been universally accepted(Rennie 1994)
sect While the significance of a particular ordermay be understood in a given setting order of authorship has no generally agreed uponmeaning (Harvard Medical School 1999)
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
sect Deciding the order of authors on research papers is a recognised problem Currently authorship order cannot be interpreted by readers and editors The last position often carries more status In some papers the senior investigator is named last in others it is the head of the laboratory or department and in others it is the person who contributed least (BMJ 1997)
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
sect The order of authors is a collective decision of the authors or study group This policy does not address questions or disputes regarding the order of authorship on publications It is not possible for the University to define the order of authorship In conjunction with the lead author co-authors should discuss authorship order at the onset of the project and revise their decision as needed All authors must work together to make these informed judgments sect WUSTL Compliance and Policies 2009
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
What does MSU say
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Self-Plagiarism
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Self-Plagiarism
sect Text Recycling sect Copyright Infringement sect Partitioning (salami slicing) sect Redundant Publication
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
What is a redundant publication
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
What is a redundant publication
sect According to the ICMJE
Redundant (or duplicate) publication is publication of a paper that overlaps substantially with one already published in print or electronic media
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Whatrsquos the big deal
sect Duplicate publication of original research is particularly problematic since it can result in inadvertent double counting or inappropriate weighting of the results of a single study which distorts the available evidence
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
How to prevent redundancy
sect Responsibility of author(s) to let the Journal Editor know that there may be an issue
sect Complete disclosure should be made up front when the manuscript is submitted
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
sect When submitting a paper the author must always make a complete statement to theeditor about all submissions and previousreports (including meeting presentations andposting of results in registries) that might beregarded as redundant or duplicatepublication The author must alert the editor if the manuscript includes subjects about whichthe authors have published a previous reportor have submitted a related report to anotherpublication Any such report must be referredto and referenced in the new paper Copies of such material should be included with the submitted manuscript to help the editordecide how to handle the matter sect ICMJE 2008
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Related Question
sect Who ldquoownsrdquo the data collected by a student for hisher dissertation at MSU
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect Both the University and the PI haveresponsibilities and rights concerning accessto use of and maintenance of originalresearch data Except where precluded bythe specific terms of sponsorship or otheragreements tangible research property including scientific data and other records ofresearch conducted under the auspices ofMichigan State University belongs to Michigan State University The PI should be responsible for maintenance and retention ofresearch data
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Research Data Management Control and Access
sect The PI is the signatory person who has scholarlyresponsibility for the conduct of the proposedresearch
sect When individuals involved in research projects atMichigan State University leave the University they may take copies of research data for projects on which they have worked The PI must however retain original data at Michigan State University
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Bottom Line (IMHO)
sect To determine authorship rules sect First check with the journal sect Next check MSU guidelines
sect PI or advisor has final say on where to submit and authorship order
sect If in doubt feel free to check with me
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
So whatrsquos the answer
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Thank youhellipAny Questions
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
How many RCR Workshops have you attended including tonightrsquos
1 One2 Two13 3 Three4 Four5 Five6 Six7 More than six
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Which of the following describes best yourdisciplinary academic affiliaCon
1 Arts amp HumaniCes2 Clinical Programs3 EducaCon4 Engineering amp Tech13
Disciplines13 5 Life Sciences13 6 Physical Sciences7 Social Sciences8 Professional Programs9 Other
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
I understand and could explain what constitutes Research Misconduct at MSU
1 Not13 at all2 Somewhat3 Moderately4 Very5 Completely
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Do you feel that you have an obligation to report acts by others that you observe amp know to violate University policies or Research Integrity Guidelines
1 Yes13 2 No
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Would you report violations of academic integrity if it could NOT be done anonymously
1 Yes13 2 No
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
I would report a fellow student to the RIO if I believed she committed research misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on
the situaCon
Research amp Scholarly Integrity
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
misconduct
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report a faculty member who was not my major professor to the RIO if I believed she committed research
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
1 Strongly Agree2 Agree3 Neutral13 4 Disagree5 Strongly Disagree6 It would depend on the
situaCon
I would report my major professor to the RIO if I believed s he committed research misconduct
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
Do you have direct knowledge of situations at MSU that you believe would constitute Research Misconduct based on tonightrsquos explanations
1 Yes13 2 No
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
LAST SESSION OF THE YEAR IN MARCH
Rigor and ReproducibilityMarch 1 2018
