Response to Intervention (RtI): Evidenced-based Practices and Technology Particularly the Ipad and...
-
Upload
felicia-hodges -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Response to Intervention (RtI): Evidenced-based Practices and Technology Particularly the Ipad and...
Response to Intervention (RtI): Evidenced-based Practices and
Technology Particularly the Ipad and Tablet Devices
Dr. Betsy Flener
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Definition
Response to Intervention is an effort to improve the academic and behavior skills of students. It is a data-based decision making program that monitors how well students respond to instruction
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Core Components
School wide screening of all students Effective early intervention Evidenced-based interventions Continuous progress monitoring Depending on progress, the intensity of
intervention may increase Interventions and decisions are data driven
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Typical Screening and Monitoring Tools/ Issues
AIMS Web Curriculum Based Measurement in Reading DIBELS easy CBM mClass Math Orchard Software Star and Star Enterprise Scholastic Vanderbilt RtI Monitor
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
The Case for Students with Visual Impairments
RtI can benefit all students Students are at a loss if we wait to intervene Percentage of unemployed working age
individuals with visual impairments Data showing the disturbing percentages of
students with visual impairments in grades 3 through 10 who do poorly on statewide reading achievement tests
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Levels
Tier 1: Quality Classroom Instruction• Provide ACCESS to and progress in the general
education curriculum• Differentiate instruction• Apply Universal Design for Learning to traditional
strategies• Front-load learning to increase student success
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Access
Appropriate selection of literacy media Text to speech (i.e. Read and Write Gold, Kurzweil
1000, Kurzweil 3000) Audio and screen readers Use of optical devices Screen magnification hardware and software Technology to access Interactive Boards and White
Boards Use of Ipads, Kindles, Nooks etc. Keyboarding skills, note takers, apps for writing and
note taking. Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Apps for Access with the IPad
Built in Accessibility– Zoom– VoiceOver– Various other features
Magnification– Easy Reader– iMagGlass– Magnifier– ICanSeeFree
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Apps for Access (Cont’d)
Accessing Interactive and White Boards– Doceri Software for Mac and Ipad ($30.00– iDisplay ($4.99)– JoinMe (free)– Tether (free for Mac)– Splashtop Whiteboard ($19.99)– Team Viewer HD (free)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2011
Apps for Access (cont’d)
Presentations– Keynote ($9.99)– SlideShare (use SlidebySlide App that is free)– SlideShark (free and great reviews)– SlidePad ($3.99)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Apps for Access (cont’d)
Apps for Writing– Penultimate ($0.99)– PaperDesk ($3.99)– Smart Writing Tool ($8.99)– Notability ($0.99)– Notetaker HD ($4.99)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Apps for Access (cont’d)
Recording – Audionote ($4.99)– Notability ($0.99)– Dragon Dictation (free and this is a phenomenal
App)– QuickVoice ($2.99)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Differentiated Instruction
Approach teaching and learning for diverse learners
Alterations in curriculum, instruction, and assessment
Recognizing students’ varying background knowledge, readiness, language, preferences, and interest
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Levels (cont’d)
Tier 2: Focused, aligned, and targeted supplemental instruction
• Differentiated, scaffolded, and targeted instruction• Small group size• Careful monitoring and charting• May change variables: time of day, group size,
additional time, focus/instruction, materials/ curriculum
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Levels (cont’d)
Tier 3: Intensive interventions• Instruction provided by a reading specialist, special
educator, or other person qualified to teach students who struggle
• Homogeneous or small group instruction and/ or individual instruction
• Often 30 to 60 more minutes added to instruction child is receiving in the general curriculum
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Evidenced-based for Visually Impaired: Reading and Writing
1. Braille readers may be better able to process oral information than large-type readers (Brothers, 1971).2. Haptic perception is sustained over time (Anater, 1980), suggesting that concrete hands-on experiences might enhance learning.3. Reading Braille with the left hand may be more effective than reading it with the right hand (Hermelin & O'Connor, 1971).4. Reducing the number of words in a Braille reading passage may not result in increased speed or comprehension (Martin & Bassin, 1977)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Evidenced based for VI (cont’d)
5. Poor Braille quality can slow down reading rate and accuracy (Millar, 1977,1987).
6. Drill-and-practice in Braille can lead to increased reading achievement, faster silent and oral reading rates, fewer reading errors, and greater comprehension (Flanagan, 1966; Flanagan & Joslin, 1969; Kederis, Nolan, & Morris, 1967; Layton & Koenig, 1998; Mangold, 1978; Umsted, 1972).
7. Braille reading comprehension decreases when other stimuli compete for the student’s attention (Millar, 1988,1990).
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Evidenced-based for VI (cont’d)
8. Leaving out words might decrease the amount of time it takes to read, but it does not increase comprehension, although it has a greater impact on news passages than it does on science or fiction passages (Martin & Bassin, 1977).
9. Training in and use of low-vision devices increases oral comcomprehension, reading speed (oral and silent), and the amount of reading accomplished (Corn, Wall, & Bell, 2001; Lackey, Efron, & Rowls, 1982; LaGrow, 1981; Smith & Erin, 2002).
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Evidenced-based Practices for Students with Visual Impairments: Math
1.Use of concrete mathematics aids can increase computation accuracy (Beicastro, 1993; Champion, 1976/77; Hatlen, 1975).
2. Comprehension of mathematics concepts can be increased with use of the Talking Calculator (Champion, 1976/77).
3. The English Language Grammar Method (a method of teaching mathematics by comparing it to English sentence structures, based on the work of Thorndike [1924] ), may improve computation (Sharpton, 1977).
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Evidenced-based for VI (cont’d)
4. Instruction in finger-math (using the fingers for computation) may increase computation accuracy (Maddux, Gates, & Sowell, 1984).
5. There is conflicting evidence concerning the effectiveness of the abacus (Kapperman, 1974, Nolan & Morris, 1964).
6. Computation using the Braille writer may be more accurate than either mental calculation or use of the abacus (Kapperman, 1974).
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Additional Studies
Emerson et al. (2009) examined the factors of age, etiology of visual impairment, family attitudes and behaviors regarding literacy activities, class size, and time spent with a teacher of students with visual impairments blindness
Clark-Bischke & Stoner (2009) examined the spelling skills in the written compositions of 20 students who read braille.
Wetzel and Knowlton (2000) compared the reading rates of 24 adult print readers and 23 adult braille readers on three reading tasks: oral reading, silent reading, and studying.
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Studies (cont’d)
Eskenazi (2011) studied scaffolding and telegraphic text in an attempt to increase reading speeds of deaf-blind and blind consumers– Reading rates incrased when non-essential words
were removed from story– Identified list of concrete words to removed– Scaffolding allowed more people to remember
more details but did not improve reading rateCopyright Betsy Flener Ed.D.
2012
Evidenced-based Program specifically for VI
Mangold Developmental Program of Tactual Perception and Braille Letter Recognition
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Adapted Programs for Visually Impaired
Read Naturally (are working on an App) Wilson Reading Reading Recovery (can be easily adapted)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Additional Approaches
• Cloze procedure• Language experience• Fluency
• Shared reading• Paired reading• Echo Reading
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Best Literacy Practices according to the International Reading Association
Authentic meaning, reading for pleasure, to accomplish a task
High quality literature Integrate a comprehensive word study/
phonics program into reading and writing instruction
Multiple texts that link and expand concepts Balanced teacher and student led discussion
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Best Literacy Practices (cont’d)
• Build a whole class community that emphasizes important concepts and builds background knowledge
• Work with students in small groups while others read and write about what they have read
• Give students plenty of time to read in class• Give students direct instruction in decoding and comprehension
strategies, balance direct instruction, guided reading, and independent learning
• Use a variety of assessment techniques
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Apps that Assess Reading Deficiencies
Reading Remedies ($0.99) Smarty Pants School ($9.99)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Apps for Literacy Instruction
Print Awareness– Book Creator ($4.99)– Pictello ($18.99)– Scribble Press (free)– Read with Me (awesome for parents)
Phonological Awareness– Word Wizard ($1.99)– Five Sharks Swimming in the Pond ($2.99)– SuperWhy ($2.99)– ABC Pocket Phonics ($2.99)– Teacher Created Activities with Sounding Board
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Apps for Literacy Instruction
Engaging Students– I Like Books (free)– Itsy Bitsy Spider ($1.99)– The Monster at the End of this Book ($3.99)– The Cat in the Hat Books (free for Lite versions)– Little Critter Books (some are ($0.99)– Old MacDonald Had a Farm ($1.99)– Trucks ($1.99)– ReadMeStories (free for Lite)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Apps for Literacy Instruction
• Fluency• Reading Rainbow (free with subscription• Dr. Seuss Books• TumblebooktoGo Munsch 6pk ($5.95)
• Phonics– Interactive Alphabet ($2.99)– Phonics Genius (free)– PhonicsRead with McGuffey Lite (free)– My Word Reader ($4.99)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Apps for Literacy Instruction
Comprehension– Reading Sketch (Lite version is free)– Learning A-Z – Various Books mentioned
Writing– Story Builder ($7.99)– Scribbe Press (free)– Sentence Builder ($5.99)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Tools for Fluency
Timer on Fire ($0.99) Fluency Timer (free) Timed Reading ($1.99)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Apps for Older Students
AudioNote ($4.99) Evernote (free) Scratch Work (free)
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Considerations
Time Visual field defects Fatigue Color Clutter and complexity Contrast
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
Considerations (cont’d)
Size of image The need for descriptions Appropriate tactile images
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
References
Clark-Bischke, C. & Stoner, J. (2009). An investigation of spelling in the written compositions of students who read braille. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 103 (10),553-563.
Emerson, R. E., Sitar, D. Erin, J. N., Wormsley, D.P., & Herlich, S. L. The effects of consistent structured reading instruction on high and low literacy achievement in young children who are blind, Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 103 (10), 595-609.
Erin, J.N. & Koenig, A. (1998). The student with a visual disability and learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30 (10), 309-320.
Eskenazi, M. (2011) Increasing braille radio reading speed for deaf-blind consumers. Retrieved from:
http://www.nprlabs.org/media/research/ar/br/Increasing%20Braille%20Radio%20Reading%20Speed_NIDRR_ICART_Eskenazi.pdf
Ferrell, K. (2006).Evidenced-based practices for students with visual disabilities.
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
References
Response to intervention procedural manual. Franklin County Schools, TN. franklincountyschools.k12tn.net/RTI.pdf
Response to intervention (RTI). www.nickey.org/Pages/RTI.aspx
Texas school a key partner in developing resources for blind and visually impaired students. www.readnaturally.com/company/news_brailletx.htm.
What is evidenced-based reading instruction? http://www.reading.org/Libraries/Position_Statements_and_Resolutions/ps1055_evidence_based.sflb.ashx
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
References
Koenig, A.J., & Farrenkopf, C. (1997). Essential experiences to undergrid the early development of literacy. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 91, 14-24.
Koenig, A. & Holbrook, C. (2000). Foundations of Education, 2nd Edition. New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind
Parker, A. & Pogrund, R. (2009). A review of the research on the literacy of students with visual impairments and additional disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 103, 635-648.
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012
References
Wetzel, R. & Knowlton, M. (2000). A comparison of print and braille reading rates on three reading tasks. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 94 (3), 146-154.
Wormsley, D. P. & D’Andrea, M. F. (1997). Instructional strategies for braille literacy. New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind.
Copyright Betsy Flener Ed.D. 2012