The interaction of sinusoidal oscillation and sinusoidal ...
Response of human muscle spindle afferents to sinusoidal stretching with a wide range of amplitudes
-
Upload
naoyuki-kakuda -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Response of human muscle spindle afferents to sinusoidal stretching with a wide range of amplitudes
The response of muscle spindles to sinusoidal stretching of
the muscle has been extensively studied in decerebrated
cats, leading to an understanding of the basic properties of
muscle spindles (Matthews & Stein, 1969; Poppele & Brown,
1970). The prominent feature of muscle spindle primary
endings is that the linear response to stretching is limited to
amplitudes lower than a few fractions of a millimetre
(Matthews & Stein, 1969). In the linear range, primary
endings possess a high stretch sensitivity. At larger
amplitudes, the response to stretching is no longer linear
and the stretch sensitivity is markedly reduced.
High stretch sensitivity at low amplitudes and amplitude
non-linearity may be crucial in determining the response of
primary endings to any input during natural movements
(e.g. Matthews, 1981). Thus, to explain the meaning of
spindle signals during natural movements, it is necessary to
explore in intact animals how muscle spindle afferents behave
during stretches for a wide range of amplitudes. Previous
studies of human muscle spindle afferents examined the
response to stretches of large amplitudes (Vallbo, 1973;
Vallbo et al. 1979; Edin & Vallbo, 1990). However, the
response to stretches at low amplitudes has not been
quantitatively described.
The purpose of the present study was to give quantitative
data for the human muscle spindle response to low
frequency sinusoidal stretching and to analyse the effect of
stretch amplitude. It will be shown that the response of
primary afferents is linear to sinusoidal stretching at low
amplitudes and that stretch sensitivity is markedly higher
in the linear range.
METHODS
Subjects
Fifteen experiments were performed on healthy volunteers, 4 males
and 11 females, aged 20—37 years. All subjects gave informed,
written consent according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The
experimental plan was approved by the Human Ethical Committee
of the National Rehabilitation Centre for the Disabled, Japan.
Experimental set-up
Each subject sat comfortably in a reclining chair, with the left
forearm supported on a platform and clamped in mid-position
Journal of Physiology (2000), 527.2, pp.397—404 397
Response of human muscle spindle afferents to sinusoidal
stretching with a wide range of amplitudes
Naoyuki Kakuda
Department of Neurology, National Rehabilitation Centre for the Disabled,
Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan
(Received 16 February 2000; accepted after revision 23 June 2000)
1. Impulses of human single muscle spindle afferents were recorded from the m. extensor carpi
radialis, while 1 Hz sinusoidal movements for a wide range of amplitudes (0·05—10 deg, half
of the peak-to-peak amplitude) were imposed at the wrist joint.
2. The response was considered as linear when the discharge was approximately sinusoidally
modulated. The linearity was further checked by a linear increase in the response with the
amplitude and a constancy of the phase and mean level.
3. Fifteen of 25 primary afferents were active at rest with a mean rate of 10·6 impulses s¢
(median). The linear response to sinusoidal stretching was limited to amplitudes lower than
about 1·0 deg. The sensitivity was 5·6 impulses s¢ deg¢ (median) in the linear range and
decreased at larger amplitudes. The other 10 primary afferents were silent at rest and lacked
a linear response at low amplitudes.
4. Nine secondary afferents were active at rest with a mean rate of 9·5 impulses s¢. The linear
range extended up to about 4·0 deg with a sensitivity of 1·4 impulses s¢ deg¢.
5. In the linear range, the phase advance of the response to sinusoidal stretching was about
50 deg and was similar between the two types of spindle afferents. In primary afferents, the
phase advance increased to nearly 90 deg outside the linear range.
6. The findings suggest that high sensitivity to small stretches is important in determining
primary afferent firing during natural movements in intact humans.
10726
Keywords:
between supination and pronation. The hand was fixed to a
manipulandum, which was connected to a servo-controlled torque
motor, enabling measurement of joint angle, velocity and torque.
An insulated tungsten electrode was percutaneously inserted into
the radial nerve 5 cm proximal to the elbow joint to record nerve
activity (Vallbo et al. 1979). The location of the muscle belly of the
m. extensor carpi radialis brevis was confirmed by palpation and
surface electrical stimulation. To record muscle activity, a pair of
surface electrodes was attached near the motor point.
Kinematic signals were sampled at 400 Hz. Surface EMG was
filtered at 1·6—800 Hz and sampled at 1600 Hz. Nerve signals were
recorded and sampled at 12 800 Hz using a SCÏZOOM system
(Department of Physiology, Ume�a, Sweden). Each recorded nerve
spike was inspected off-line on an expanded time scale. When it
was judged to be from a single unit based on the regularity of firing
and shape invariance of consecutive spikes, the nerve signal was
converted to a spike train at 400 Hz for later analysis.
Unit identification
Slowly adapting muscle afferents from the m. extensor carpi radialis
brevis were identified by prodding the muscle and tendon. Care was
taken to confirm the origin of each afferent as the m. extensor carpi
radialis brevis. Further identification procedures consisted of a
passive ramp stretch and release of 16 deg and maximal twitch
contraction by surface stimulation of the motor point. Muscle
spindle afferents were tentatively classified as primary and
secondary based on the response during ramp stretch and release.
An initial burst at the start of a stretch, deceleration at the end of a
stretch and the silence during the releasing phase of a stretch were
considered as primary afferent signs (Edin & Vallbo, 1990).
Experimental protocol
The wrist joint was held in position at a 10 deg flexion from the
horizontal. Sinusoidal movements were imposed at the wrist joint
with this position taken as 0 deg. The subject was instructed to
relax completely during imposed movements.
When a single muscle spindle afferent was recorded, 1 Hz sinusoidal
movements of 8·0, 5·0, 2·5, 1·0, 0·50, 0·25 and 0·10 deg (half of the
peak-to-peak amplitude, throughout the text) were tested in this
order. Sinusoidal movements of fixed amplitude were imposed for
10—20 s (Fig. 1A) and the recording started after a few initial
cycles. When recording conditions were stable, the stretch amplitude
was adjusted with finer steps in the range of 0·05—10·0 deg.
Size of movements
The excursion of the tendon during the test movement can be
roughly estimated in the following way. If the radius of the joint is
approximated to 13·0 mm (Brand, 1985) and the muscle length of
the m. extensor carpi radialis brevis is 186 mm (Loren & Lieber,
1995), then a 1·0 deg flexion corresponds to a 0·23 mm stretch. If it
is supposed that any movement in the tendon corresponds to a
muscle fibre stretch of the same amount, a 1·0 deg flexion
corresponds to a 0·12% relative stretch of the resting muscle length.
Data analysis
The records of 8—12 cycles of 1 Hz sinusoidal movements of
constant amplitude were used for analysis. The procedure in this
study was almost the same as the methods used in previous studies
in decerebrated cats (Matthew & Stein, 1969; Hulliger et al. 1977a).
The cycle of sinusoidal movement was divided into 400 bins. The
mean interspike interval of all the spikes occurring in each bin was
then calculated over a number of cycles. The inverse of the mean
interval was the mean discharge rate. The sine curve was fitted to
the mean discharge rate by the least mean square method.
The mean level, depth of modulation and phase were measured in
the fitted sine (Fig. 1B). The depth of modulation was assessed as
half of the peak-to peak-amplitude. The phase was defined as the
difference between the fitted sine and the sinusoidal movement.
The correlation coefficient (rÂ) was calculated to check what
proportion of variance in the mean discharge rate was attributed to
the fitted sine. In the present study, data were used when the
correlation coefficient was higher than 0·6. Moreover, the root-
mean-square (r.m.s.) deviation of the mean discharge rate from the
fitted sine was calculated to check for a goodness of fit. It was
represented by the percentage of the depth of modulation.
When the amplitude of sinusoidal movements was large, primary
afferents ceased firing for part of the whole cycle. In such cases, the
silent period in the mean discharge rate was determined by eye and
was not used for fitting the sine curve, which was allowed to project
below zero (Fig. 2C). The correlation coefficient and the root-mean-
square deviation were calculated in the same period as used in the
fitting procedure.
RESULTS
Twenty-five muscle spindle primary afferents and nine
secondary afferents were recorded from the m. extensor
carpi radialis brevis. The resting discharge was assessed
while the wrist joint was held in position at a 10 deg flexion
from the horizontal. Fifteen primary afferents were active
and the median value of the mean discharge rate was
10·6 impulses s¢ (range, 3·4—18·9). The other 10 primary
afferents were silent. All secondary afferents were active
and the median value of the mean discharge rate was
9·5 impulses s¢ (range, 3·4—14·9).
When the subjects relaxed completely, the spindle discharge
was relatively regular and the discharge rate was low.
Spontaneous fluctuations in the mean level of discharge rate
were not observed. Fusimotor action was therefore probably
low and henceforth will be considered negligible, in
agreement with previous conclusions for human subjects
(e.g. Vallbo et al. 1979).
Measurement of spindle response to sinusoidal
stretching
Figure 1 shows a representative result of primary afferent
behaviour during sinusoidal stretches at low amplitudes.
Figure 1A shows the raw record while 1 Hz sinusoidal
movements of 0·25 deg (half of the peak-to-peak amplitude)
were imposed at the wrist joint. The discharge is clearly
modulated by sinusoidal movements, as seen in the
instantaneous discharge rate.
Figure 1B shows the instantaneous discharge rate averaged
cycle by cycle (thin line) and the fitted sine curve (thick line),
and illustrates the measurement of the response. The
discharge was sinusoidally modulated (r = 0·98) around the
mean level of 6·8 impulses s¢. The depth of modulation was
1·15 impulses s¢ (half of the peak-to-peak amplitude) and
the phase advance to the sinusoidal movement was 75 deg.
The root-mean-square deviation of the mean discharge rate
from the fitted sine was 0·13 impulses s¢, equal to 11·1% of
the depth of modulation.
N. Kakuda J. Physiol. 527.2398
Response of a primary afferent to stretching with a
widely ranging amplitude
Figure 2 shows the mean discharge rates (thin line) and the
fitted sine curves (thick line) of a primary afferent. The
mean level of resting discharge was 13·2 impulses s¢. The
amplitude of sinusoidal movements increased by a factor of
four and was 0·25 (A), 1·0 (B) and 4·0 deg (C).
In Fig. 2A and B, the discharge was approximately
sinusoidally modulated (r = 0·98 in both). The depth of
modulation was 1·7 impulses s¢ at 0·25 deg (A) and
6·7 impulses s¢ at 1·0 deg (B), and the increase was
proportional to the amplitude. The mean level
(13·0 impulses s¢) and phase advance (44 and 41 deg) held
constant between A and B. Accordingly, the response in A
and B may be regarded to fall in the linear range. The root-
mean-square deviation held at about 10%.
When the amplitude increased by a further factor of four,
the afferent ceased firing for about half of a whole cycle (C).
The response was not sinusoidal and apparently outside the
linear range. The silent period was not used for fitting the
sine curve (see Methods). The fitted sine ranged between
−9·7 and 26·0 impulses s¢ and the mean level decreased to
8·1 impulses s¢. The depth of modulation was
17·9 impulses s¢ and the increase was less than proportional
to the amplitude. The phase advance increased to 67 deg,
which was a further sign of non-linearity. The root-mean-
square deviation increased to 14·3%.
Relation between amplitude of stretching and
response of a primary afferent
Figure 3 shows the relation between the amplitude of
stretching and the response of the primary afferent in
Fig. 2. The amplitude ranged between 0·05 and 8·0 deg. The
r value was higher than 0·6 at any amplitude, indicating
that the discharge was significantly modulated. The depth
of modulation (A), the mean level (B), the phase advance (C)
and the root-mean-square deviation (D) are plotted against
the amplitude.
The depth of modulation (A) linearly increased at amplitudes
between 0·05—2·0 deg. On the other hand, the mean level
(B) held constant up to only 1·0 deg and progressively
decreased at larger amplitudes. This reduction was related
with the distortion of the response from the sine curve, and
in particular with the cessation of discharges for part of the
whole cycle. Thus, the increase in the depth of modulation
between 1·0—2·0 deg was, in part, due to the reduction in
the mean level. Similarly to the mean level, the phase
advance (C) held constant up to 1·0 deg and then increased
at larger amplitudes. From A—C, it is confirmed that the
Muscle spindle response to sinusoidal stretchJ. Physiol. 527.2 399
Figure 1. Measurement of the response of a primary afferent to sinusoidal stretching
A, raw record during 1 Hz sinusoidal movements imposed at the wrist joint. The amplitude was 0·25 deg
(half of the peak-to-peak amplitude). From top to bottom, joint angle, primary afferent activity and its
instantaneous discharge rate and surface EMG. B, mean instantaneous discharge rate (thin line) and the
fitted sine curve (thick line). The horizontal axis shows the phase of sinusoidal stretching with a range of
−180 and 180 deg. The vertical axis shows the discharge rate. The horizontal line indicates the mean level,
while the vertical and horizontal arrows indicate the depth of modulation and the phase advance,
respectively. The depth of modulation was defined as half the peak-to-peak amplitude. The phase was
defined as the difference between the fitted sine and the sinusoidal stretching.
linear response was limited to amplitudes up to 1·0 deg. In
Fig. 3A, linear regression was applied to the points below
1·0 deg (r = 0·98). The line passes near the origin and the
slope indicates a sensitivity of 6·3 impulses s¢ deg¢.
The root-mean-square deviation (D) stayed at about 10%
between 0·2 and 1·0 deg and increased at larger amplitudes.
This suggests that the fitting of the sine curve to the mean
discharge rate was good in the linear range. (The value at
both 0·05 and 0·10 deg was about 30%. The depth of
modulation was less than 0·5 impulses s¢ at amplitudes
lower than 0·10 deg, so that the spontaneous variation in
the discharge was not negligible.)
N. Kakuda J. Physiol. 527.2400
Figure 2. Response of a primary afferent to 1 Hz sinusoidal stretching at different amplitudes
Mean instantaneous discharge rates (thin lines) and the fitted sine curves (thick lines). The stretch
amplitude increased by a factor of four and was 0·25 (A), 1·0 (B) and 4·0 deg (C). The horizontal axis shows
the phase of sinusoidal stretching with a range of −180 and 180 deg. The vertical axis shows the discharge
rate. Note that the vertical scale in C is twice than that in A—B. The horizontal lines indicate the mean level
in the fitted sine, while the vertical and horizontal arrows indicate the depth of modulation and the phase
advance, respectively. In C, the mean discharge rate fell silent for about half of the cycle. The silent period
was not used for fitting of the sine curve and the fitted sine projected below zero.
Linear range of primary and secondary afferents
Fifteen of 25 primary afferents were active at rest. The
discharge was significantly modulated (r > 0·6) in 10
afferents at 0·10 deg and in all afferents above 0·25 deg. The
median value of the linear range was 1·0 deg (range, 0·2—1·9).
In the linear range, the median value of the sensitivity was
5·6 impulses s¢ deg¢ (range, 3·0—22·6). The medians and
quartiles (25 and 75%) of the depth of modulation were
plotted against the amplitude of stretching in the upper
graph of Fig. 4A. The linear increase was limited to
amplitudes lower than 1·0 deg in the total sample.
The other 10 primary afferents were silent at rest. They
started firing during sinusoidal movements at 0·90 deg
(median). At any amplitude, they ceased firing for part of
the whole cycle and the response was different from the sine
curve. They lacked a linear response to stretches at low
amplitudes, while the response at amplitudes above about
1·0 deg was similar to that in Fig. 4A.
All nine secondary afferents were active at rest. The
modulation of the discharge was significant in three afferents
at 0·10 deg, in seven afferents at 0·25 deg and in all afferents
above 0·50 deg. The median value of the linear range was
3·6 deg (range, 1·0—8·0). The median value of the sensitivity
was 1·4 impulses s¢ deg¢ (range, 0·88—3·1). The upper graph
of Fig. 4B plots the depth of modulation in the total sample,
which linearly increased with the amplitude up to 8 deg.
Phase advance
The phase advance of the response to sinusoidal stretching
in the total sample was plotted in the lower graphs of Fig. 4.
In primary afferents (A), the phase advance increased from
50 to 70 deg at amplitudes between 0·1 and 1·0 deg. Some
afferents fell outside the linear range at 0·5 or 1·0 deg,
accompanying the increase in the phase advance. In
secondary afferents (B), the phase advance ranged between
40 and 60 deg. Therefore, the phase advance was about
50 deg in the linear range and similar between the two
types of spindle afferents. Both types of afferents respond
Muscle spindle response to sinusoidal stretchJ. Physiol. 527.2 401
Figure 3. Relation between the amplitude of stretching and the response of a primary afferent
The effect of stretch amplitude is shown in the same primary afferent as Fig. 2. The stretch amplitude
ranged between 0·05 and 8·0 deg. The depth of modulation (A), the phase advance (B), the mean level in
the fitted sine (C) and the root-mean-square deviation of the mean discharge rate from the fitted sine (D) are
plotted against the amplitude of sinusoidal stretching. In A, linear regression was applied to the points
below 1·0 deg (r = 0·98). The y-intercept was −0·19 impulses s¢ and the slope was 6·3 impulses s¢ deg¢.
to the compound of the position and the velocity components
of sinusoidal stretching.
In primary afferents, the phase advance increased to about
80 deg at amplitudes above 1·0 deg. This indicates that the
velocity component was dominant in determining the
response of primary afferents outside the linear range.
Response of spindle afferents to large amplitude ramp
stretching
The sensitivity of muscle spindles to large stretches was
measured for comparison to the stretch sensitivity at low
amplitudes. A ramp stretch of 16 deg was applied at the
wrist joint over 0·9 s with a speed of about 18 deg s¢.
The static position response was defined as the difference in
discharge rate between that just before the start of the
stretch and that during the static phase of the stretch. The
latter was assessed as the mean rate during the holding
phase between 0·5—1·5 s after the end of the stretch. The
dynamic response was measured as the dynamic index,
which was defined as the difference in discharge rate
between that just before the end of the stretch and that
during the static phase of the stretch (Edin & Vallbo, 1990;
Kakuda & Nagaoka, 1998).
The response to the ramp stretch was recorded in
ten primary and seven secondary afferents of Fig. 4. The
median value of the static position response was
5·3 impulses s¢ (range, 3·3—10·2) and 6·7 impulses s¢
(range, 5·8—10·4) in the primary and secondary afferents,
respectively. The static sensitivities were calculated as
0·33 impulses s¢ deg¢ and 0·42 impulses s¢ deg¢,
respectively, and similar between the two types of spindles.
The median value of the dynamic index was 10·5 impulses s¢
(range, 6·1—15·0) and 4·6 impulses s¢ (range, 1·8—7·4) in
the primary and afferents, respectively. The dynamic index
of primary afferents was larger than that of secondary
afferents. These results are compatible with previous data
recorded in human forearm muscles (Vallbo, 1973; Edin &
Vallbo, 1990) and in isolated human intercostal muscles
(Newsom Davis, 1975).
N. Kakuda J. Physiol. 527.2402
Figure 4. Summary of the response of 15 primary and 9 secondary muscle spindle afferents to
1 Hz sinusoidal stretching
The effect of stretch amplitude on the response of primary and secondary afferents is summarised in A and B,
respectively. The upper graphs plot the depth of modulation against the amplitude of stretching, while the
lower graphs plot the phase advance. 1, medians, and horizontal bars indicate the quartiles (25% and 75%).
The sensitivity of the primary afferents to sinusoidal
stretching at low amplitudes (5·6 impulses s¢ deg¢) was
more than 10-fold of the static sensitivity (0·33 impulses
s¢ deg¢). It was also much higher than the dynamic index
(10·5 impulses s¢), considering the amplitude (16 deg) and
the speed (18 deg s¢) of the ramp stretch. In secondary
afferents, the sensitivity to sinusoidal stretching
(1·4 impulses s¢ deg¢) was of the same order of magnitude
as the static sensitivity (0·42 impulses s¢ deg¢) and the
dynamic index (4·6 impulses s¢) of the large ramp stretch.
DISCUSSION
The present study gives the first quantitative description of
the response of human muscle spindle afferents to low
frequency sinusoidal stretching over widely ranging
amplitudes.
The main finding was that the response of primary afferents
to 1 Hz sinusoidal stretching at amplitudes below about
1·0 deg was linear. The stretch sensitivity in the linear range
was markedly higher, compared with the sensitivity at larger
amplitudes. In secondary afferents, the linear range extended
to larger amplitudes and the stretch sensitivity was about
one_fourth to one_fifth of that of the primary afferents. In
the linear range, both position and velocity components of
stretching contributed to the response and the two types of
spindle afferents were similar in this respect. The appearance
of non-linearity in the spindle responses provides further
evidence that fusimotor activity is low for relaxed human
muscles (Hulliger et al. 1977a; Cussons et al. 1977).
Comparison to muscle spindles in the decerebrated cats
The linear range of human primary afferents was 1·0 deg at
the wrist joint, estimated to be 0·23 mm and 0·12 percentage
of the resting muscle length (see Methods). The stretch
sensitivity of 5·6 impulses s¢ deg¢ corresponded to
24 impulses s¢ mm¢ and 47 impulses s¢ (percentage of the
resting muscle length)¢. In the primary endings of the
soleus muscle (length 50 mm) in decerebrated cats with
intact ventral roots, the linear range was about 0·1 mm and
0·2 percentage of the resting muscle length. The sensitivity
was about 100 impulses s¢ mm¢ and 50 impulses s¢
(percentage of the resting muscle length)¢ (Matthews &
Stein, 1969; Hulliger et al. 1977a). In absolute modulation
(impulses s¢) and sensitivity (impulses s¢ mm¢), the
present data are smaller than expected from the data for the
cat. However, when the sensitivity is expressed in relation
to resting muscle length, the figures are more uniform.
The morphological evidence suggests that the difference in
absolute modulation (impulses s¢) and sensitivity
(impulses s¢ mm¢) is not attributable to fundamental
differences in structure per se between human and cat
spindles (Hulliger, 1984). It is conceivable that the spindle
sensitivity (impulses s¢ mm¢) is related to the resting
muscle length. In long muscles, spindles need not lie in
parallel with the entire length of extrafusal muscle fibres.
Instead, they often originate from, and insert at, extrafusal
muscle fibres, so that they are arranged in series with
compliant elements (Baker, 1974). Given that human
spindles are not longer than cat spindles, locally effective
length changes during stretch might constitute a smaller
fraction of the change in whole-muscle length than for the
much shorter muscles in cats (Hulliger, 1984).
Although the spindle sensitivity might be related to resting
muscle length, it also seems likely that the lower sensitivity
of human primary afferents is at least partly due to
experimental conditions. The present data were obtained
with the wrist near its mid position, far from the position at
which the m. extensor carpi radialis brevis would be at its
maximal physiological length. On the other hand, the data
for the cat were obtained at the maximal physiological
length of the muscle. If the fusimotor activity is eliminated
after cutting the ventral roots in decerebrated cats, spindle
endings have a high sensitivity when the muscle is at
physiological full extension, but not when the muscle is
shorter (Matthews & Stein, 1969). Therefore, the difference
in sensitivity (impulses s¢ mm¢) between the data for
human subjects and that for the cat might be partly due to
the difference in extension of the muscles and to the low
fusimotor action for relaxed human muscles.
The sensitivity of human secondary afferents was
1·4 impulses s¢ deg¢ (6·2 impulses s¢ mm¢) in the linear
range and it was about one_fourth of that of primary
afferents. Considering the differences in experimental
conditions, it would be worth noting that the difference in
sensitivity to small stretching between the two types of
spindles for relaxed human subjects was of the same order of
magnitude as that for decerebrated cats (Matthews & Stein,
1969; Cussons et al. 1977).
Functional implications
The discharge rate of human spindle afferents is usually
0—30 impulses s¢ and rarely exceeds 50 impulses s¢ during
natural movements (Vallbo et al. 1979). Although the
discharge rate is rather low, the present data show that
small stretches of the muscle appreciably modulate the
discharge rate of the primary afferents. A 1 deg movement
at the wrist joint produces a modulation of 6 impulses s¢ in
a primary afferent, corresponding to 60% of the pre-
existing level (about 10 impulses s¢). It seems reasonable to
conclude that the high stretch sensitivity at low amplitudes
plays an important part in determining the spindle activity,
at least during passive movements.
The stretch sensitivity of muscle spindles may be affected
by the fusimotor activity during voluntary contractions and
it is necessary to address whether the high stretch
sensitivity at low amplitudes is maintained or not during
voluntary contractions. In decerebrated cats, the stretch
sensitivity of the primary endings at low amplitudes is
reduced by stimulation of a fusimotor fibre, irrespective of
dynamic or static fibre. When both dynamic and static fibres
are stimulated, the reduction in sensitivity is dependent on
Muscle spindle response to sinusoidal stretchJ. Physiol. 527.2 403
the balance between the two types of fusimotor actions
(Goodwin et al. 1975; Hulliger et al. 1977a,b). It was
suggested in humans that both dynamic and static fusimotor
neurones are active during voluntary contractions, when the
spindle response was tested by a large amplitude ramp
stretch (Kakuda & Nagaoka, 1998). Thus, the fusimotor
system possibly maintains and controls the stretch sensitivity
of primary endings at low amplitudes during voluntary
contractions. As a result, the primary afferents can signal
small length changes in the muscle occurring during slow
voluntary movements (Wessberg & Vallbo, 1995).
The present data support the view that the muscle spindles
contribute to the detection of small passive movements
(McCloskey, 1978; Proske et al. 2000). This argument is
based on the observation that significant modulation in the
discharge rate was obtained during sinusoidal stretches at
0·10 deg in 10 of 25 primary afferents. The threshold
amplitude of the primary afferents may be compatible with
the psychophysical results. For example, threshold detection
of movements imposed at the elbow joint is about 0·1 deg
(Wise et al. 1998). It was shown in humans that both muscle
spindles and slowly adapting type II cutaneous mechano-
receptors provide reasonable velocity signals of passive
movements at large amplitudes (Grill & Hallett, 1995),
implying the contribution of both types of sensory inputs to
movement perception. To investigate the relative roles of
muscle spindles and cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the
detection of movements, particularly at small amplitudes, it
would be helpful to examine the response of cutaneous
mechanoreceptors to small stretches as used in the present
study.
In conclusion, muscle spindle primary afferents in humans
respond linearly to stretches at low amplitudes with high
responsiveness. This suggests that high sensitivity to small
stretches is important in the determination of primary
afferent firing during natural movement and that muscle
spindles contribute to fine motor control, as well as
kinaesthetic sensibility.
Baker, D. (1974). The morphology of muscle receptors. In Handbook
of Sensory Physiology, vol. 3, Muscle Receptors, part 2, ed. Hunt,C.C., pp. 1—190. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Brand, P. W. (1985). Clinical Mechanics of the Hand. The C. V.Mosby Company, St Louis, Toronto & Princeton.
Cussons, P. D., Hulliger, M. & Matthews, P. B. C. (1977). Effects offusimotor stimulation on the response of the secondary ending ofthe muscle spindle to sinusoidal stretching. Journal of Physiology
270, 835—850.
Edin, B. B. & Vallbo, �A. B. (1990). Dynamic response of humanmuscle spindle afferents to stretch. Journal of Neurophysiology 63,1297—1306.
Goodwin, G. M., Hulliger, M. & Matthews, P. B. C. (1975). Theeffect of fusimotor stimulation during small amplitude stretching onthe frequency—response of the primary ending of the mammalianmuscle spindle. Journal of Physiology 253, 175—206.
Grill, S. E. & Hallett, M. (1995). Velocity sensitivity of humanmuscle spindle afferents and slowly adapting type II cutaneousmechanoreceptors. Journal of Physiology 489, 593—602.
Hulliger, M. (1984). The mammalian muscle spindle and its centralcontrol. Reviews in Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology 101,1—110.
Hulliger, M., Matthews, P. B. C. & Noth, J. (1977a). Static anddynamic fusimotor action on the response of Ia fibres to lowfrequency sinusoidal stretching of widely ranging amplitude.Journal of Physiology 267, 811—838.
Hulliger, M., Matthews, P. B. C. & Noth, J. (1977b). Effects ofcombining static and dynamic fusimotor stimulation on theresponse of the muscle spindle primary ending to sinusoidalstretching. Journal of Physiology 267, 839—856.
Kakuda, N. & Nagaoka, M. (1998). Dynamic response of humanmuscle spindle afferents to stretch during voluntary contraction.Journal of Physiology 513, 621—628.
Loren, G. J. & Lieber, R. L. (1995). Tendon biomechanicalproperties enhance human wrist muscle specialization. Journal of
Biomechanics 28, 791—799.
McCloskey, D. I. (1978). Kinaesthetic sensibility. Physiological
Reviews 58, 763—820.
Matthews, P. B. C. & Stein, R. B. (1969). The sensitivity of musclespindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length. Journal of
Physiology 200, 723—743.
Matthews, P. B. C. (1981). Muscle spindles: their message and theirfusimotor supply. In Handbook of Physiology, section 1, The
Nervous System, vol. II, Motor Control, part 2, ed. Brookes, V. B.,pp. 189—228. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Newsom Davis, J. (1975). The response to stretch of humanintercostal muscle spindles studied in vitro. Journal of Physiology
249, 561—579.
Proske, U., Wise, A. K. & Gregory, J. E. (2000). The role of musclereceptors in the detection of movements. Progress in Neurobiology
60, 85—96.
Poppele, R. E. & Brown, R. J. (1970). Quantitative description oflinear behavior of mammalian muscle spindles. Journal of
Neurophysiology 33, 59—72.
Vallbo, �A. B. (1973). Afferent discharge from human muscle spindlesin non-contracting muscles. Steady state impulse frequency as afunction of joint angle. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 90, 303—318.
Vallbo, �A. B., Hagbarth, K.-E., Torebj�ork, H. E. & Wallin, B. G.(1979). Somatosensory, proprioceptive, and sympathetic activity inhuman peripheral nerves. Physiological Reviews 59, 919—957.
Wessberg, J. & Vallbo, �A. B. (1995). Coding of pulsatile motoroutput by human muscle spindle afferents during slow fingermovements. Journal of Physiology 488, 833—840.
Wise, A. K., Gregory, J. E. & Proske, U. (1998). Detection ofmovements of the human forearm during and after co-contractionsof muscles acting at the elbow joint. Journal of Physiology 508,325—330.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of
Japan.
Correspondence
N. Kakuda: Department of Neurology, National Rehabilitation
Centre for the Disabled, 4-1 Namiki, Tokorozawa, Saitama
359_8555, Japan.
Email: [email protected]. jp
N. Kakuda J. Physiol. 527.2404