Resonance Scattering Technique and break-up to study nuclear structure
description
Transcript of Resonance Scattering Technique and break-up to study nuclear structure
1
Resonance Scattering Technique and break-up to study nuclear structure
ISOLDE Nuclear Reaction and Nuclear Structure Course
A. Di Pietro
2
Outline of the lecture:
Resonance scattering method in reverse kinematics.
Advantages of the technique.
Resolution. Discrimination of different processes and energy reconstruction.
Resonant break-up
3-body kinematics
3
n
2H1H
3He 4He3H
6Li 7Li
9Be
6He
8Li8He
8Be7Be 10Be9Li
11Be12Be11Li
10B 11B 12B 13B 14B 15B14Be
9B8B
12C 13C 14C 15C 16C 17C 18C 19C 20C17B 19B
11C10C9C8C
14N 15N 16N 17N 18N 19N 20N 21N13N12N11N
12O 13O 14O 15O 16O 17O 18O 19O 20O 21O 22O
core
core
neutron halo
neutron skin
Decoupling of Proton and neutrons
α α
α α
molecular
α
αα
dilute gas
αα α
0+2 in 12C
6He,11Li,11Be
8He,CBe isotopes
10C, 16C
3-2 in 14C
triangle
excited states
HeLiBe
BC
H
Exotic structures in light nuclei
vanishing of magic number
From Y. Kanada En’yo
44
Cluster structure is a well established feature of many light NZ nuclei both in their ground and excited states.
1. Clusters are formed by tightly bound nucleons (cluster is stiff, i.e. not easy to excite);
2. Weakly coupled inter-cluster motion is considered.
Threshold rule: i.e. these states appear close to the threshold for breaking-up into the cluster constituents.
Ikeda diagram
Ex. Hoyle state in 12C
Weak coupling picture:
Conventional cluster structure
K. Ikeda et al. Supp.Progr.Theo.Phys. 68(1980)1
5
Possible ways to study cluster structures: transfer and decay into the constituents
Resonant elastic scattering 2-body process
Experimental signature:
large reduced width for cluster decay
rotational bands with band head around the threshold for cluster decay (measurement of Eexc and Jπ moment of inertia)
inelastic scattering followed by break up
3-body processes
Ex: 10Be+9Be->15C*+a->11Be+a+a
Ex: 10Be+a->14C*->10Be+aEx: 10Be+b->6He+a+b
6
Resonant scattering method (RSM) in invese kinematicsK.P.Artemov et al. Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 52(1990)408
Elastic scattering of heavy projectiles B on a light targets b (protons or as) in order to study properties of the compound nucleus C resulting from
B+b C B+b
Excitation function measured at qcm180º enhanced visibility of resonances with respect to potential and Coulomb scattering.
Used in the last ten years to measure excitation functions with radioactive beams.
thick solid or gasous target
gaseous target (H, He)
easy to change target thickness (changing gas pressure)
more homogeneous target
7
Allows to measure excitation function in a wide energy range without changing beam energy reduces running time of the experiment
Allows to measure recoil particles around q c.m.~180°
Allows precise measurement of resonance properties: Er, Jp, Gtot, Gp, Ga
Very useful in experiments with low intensity beams (104 ÷ 106 pps).
heavy beamlight
recolil particle
8
Advantages of using inverse kinematics
E0 e T0 = laboratory projectile energy in direct and reverse kinematics respectively
E0' e T0' = c.m. energy in direct and reverse kinematics respectively
Θ =laboratory scattering angle of light particle
E3 e T3 = light particle laboratory energy in direct and reverse kinematics respectively
E0
Inverse kinematics
QT0
Direct kinematics
Q
T3 E3
9
MmMTT+
0'
0 MmmEE+
0'0
direct inverse
kmM
TE
0
0
22
03 )1( +
+ k
MmmTT
203 4Mm
mMEE+
Some trivial equations (see previous lecture)
For the same c.m. energy:
T0' = E0'
For: θlab = 0° (= 180° in the c.m.) light particle enrgy is:
10
V1L
V2L
V1B
V2B
VBL
In the current notation :
E3=E2L recoil energy in the Lab systemE1L=E0 projectile energy
LLBLLBLcm
Lcm
BLBL
BLBLBBLLL
EMm
mMEEMm
mMmVEMmmV
MmmME
EmM
mE
mVVm
VVVVmmVEE
123122
12
1
22
122
222
223
)(4
)(21
21
2144
21
)cos2(21
21
+
+
+
+
+
-+ q
at q1B=180°
11
€
Eex = Ec.m. +Q = E0m
M +m+Q
QEM
mMElab
ex ++
32 )(cos4 q
Excitation function from measured recoil energy:
B+b C*B+b
12
2
2
4 ZzE
dxdEdxdE
E
HI
li
∆E=beam energy straggling in the laboratory
(dE/dx)li= stopping power for light particles
(dE/dx)HI= stopping power for beam particles
z= charge of light recoil particles
Z=charge of beam particles
Laboratory energy resolution for light recoil particles in inverse kinematics.
1313
Energy resolution depends also from:
Beam spot size
Detector energy resolution
Detector angular resolution
Kinematical spread within dq Beam angular straggling
Recoil angular straggling (small)
Estraggx
x
Due to energy straggling, to the same Ec.m. correspond different Edet. due to different paths. Effect larger at q>00 due to additional contribution of different scattering angles.
Dependence of energy resolution from energy straggling
q=00
q>00
32S+aG. Rogachev Ph.D thesis. Moscow1999
14
Problems of using this technique:
Sources of background inelastic scattering events
Precise knowledge of stopping power to extract correctly the resonance parameters
Need to measure de/dx with radioactive beams (but not only!)
15
In experiment with a gasous extended target is possible to discriminate elastic from inelastic from time of flight measurement or tracking (active targets).
How to discriminate elastic from inelastic scattering events?
From a or p spectrum no possibilities to discriminate the process which produces recoil particles.
1616
Calculated TtOF- ∆E 2d-spectrum
Example: 9Be + 4He
17
9Beg
s
9Be*
Projecting on time axis
Time resolution ΔT~1 ns
Inelastic
Elastic
Experimental Ttof-∆E 2d-spectrum
18
Excitation function 9Be + α with RSM on infinite target and energy loss calculated using Monte Carlo code SRIM M. Zadro et al, NIM B259 (2007).
— Excitation function α+9Be measured with thin target method varying beam energy at small streps J. Liu [NIM B 108,(1996) 247] , J.D. Goss [PRC 7,(1973) 247]
Excitation function 9Be+4He at Ecm<4.5MeV
Different energy resonance with the two techniques !
Problems with stopping power calculations.
19
Using measured energy loss data
Note: changing stopping power date changes also extracted resonance cross-section
20
Excitation function 9Be+a at Ecm>4.5 MeV
Excitation function 9Be + α with RSM on infinite target M. Zadro et al, NIM B259 (2007).
— Excitation function α+9Be measured with thin target method varying beam energy at small streps R.B.Taylor [NP 65,(1965) 318]
Using measured energy loss data
Need to measure stopping power with RIBs but not only!
21
Some example of experiments performed using RIBs and RSM technique.
22
RSM on thick target
Curtsy of C. Angulo
Level scheme of p-rich nuclei unknown for many species.
By bombarding a 1H enriched target with a p-rich radioactive beam possibility to study levels in the p-rich compound nucleus which are proton unbound.
23
18Ne+p @ Elab=21, 23.5 and 28 MeV
Experiment performed at CRC Louvain-la Neuve
Average beam intensity ~4 106 ppsTarget 0.5 mg/cm2 polyethylene
Detection set-up
b background
C. Angulo et al. Nucl. Phys. A 716(2003)211
24
Very large Coulomb shift (~0.73 MeV) typical of deformed states in nuclei near the drip-line.
R-matrix analysisLevel scheme
2525
Beam profile
E8Li=30.6 MeV I≈5x104pps
P=700 mbarT=295 K
aΔE : quadrants 50x50 mm2 quadrants Si detectors 50 μm thick.
E Double Sided Silicon Strip Detectors, 50x50 mm2 16+16 strip, 1000 μm
50 mm
50 mm
MCP Detectorgas target
Entrance window
ΔE + DSSSDdetectors
Stopping power detectors
beam
8Li+4He12B
2626
ΔE Eres
Elastic scattering α particle discrimination
3 H
Background: 8Li (β-)→ 8Be*→ 2 α
α - particle punch through
Background a spectrum: 8Li (β-)→ 8Be*→ 2 α
α
2727
Comparison with literature
E MeV Err keV Width keV Jπ;T reazione
13.33 30 50±20 9Be(7Li,α)
13.40 100 Broad 10B(t,p)
13.4 9Be(7Li,2α)
14.1 9Be(7Li,2α)
14.80 100 <200 2+;2 14C(p,3He)
15.50 9Be(7Li, α)
15.7 9Be(7Li,2α)
17.7 9Be(7Li,2α)
13.5
15.8
14.4
12B states. a particle threshold 10.0 MeV
9Be+7Li → 2α+8Li
Soic N., Europhys. Lett.,63 (2003), 524
2828
Resonant particle spectroscopy: transfer and decay into the constituents
Ex: 10Be+b->6He+a+b
inelastic scattering followed by break up
3-body processes
Ex: 10Be+9Be->15C*+a
Resonant particle spectroscopy
Ex: A+B->C*+a
M. Milin at al. EPJ A41(2009)335
The detection of break-up products select states with large partial widths for decaying into a chosen channel thus enabling the selection of states with well-developed cluster structure. High segmentation of the detection system allows for high resolution measurement.
6He+12C4He+14C*4He+4He+10Be
Three body kinematics
Three body kinematics
Center of mass system Sequential decay relative coordinate system
12
3
1
2
3
VBL
V1B
V1L
q1L q1B
Reaction: P+T→1+2+3
VBL=(2mPEPL)1/2/(mP+mT)
V1B2=V1L2+VBL2-2V1LVBLcosq1L
E1B=½m1V1L2+m1(mPEPL)/(mP+mT)2-m1V1L(2mPEPL)1/2/(mP+mT)cosq1L
a12
E1B=E1L-2a1E1Lcosq1L+a12
f1B=f1L
21
211111
1111
cos2
coscos
aEaE
aE
BBB
BBL
++
+
q
qq f1B=f1L
2111111 cos2 aEaEE BBBL ++ q
21211111
1111
cos2
coscos
aEaE
aE
LLL
LLB
+-
-
q
bLTbL
bB
bLALA
bLbBB
DEE
EmEm
sin/sin
sinsin
If we detect particle one the kinematics is completely determined by the two body (particle 1 and 23) kinematics.
If we detect particle 2 and 3 we have to reconstruct the excitation energy of particle 23.
322313 -- ++
+ EEEmm
mQE LP
TP
TbodyTot
Total energy available in the cener of mass system
m1=mass of particle 1m23=m2+m3= mass of particle 23M=m1+m2+m3
We define the reduced masses:m1-23=m1m23/(m1+m23)=m1(m2+m3)/Mm2-3=m2m3/m2+m3
Ecm
Measured quantities are E1L,q1L,f1L – E2L,q2L,f2L- E3L,q3L,f3L of one, two or even three particles
NB: we note that the velocity vectors are in the 3 dimentional space not in plane and both q and f angles are important.
Eg. One wants to reconstruct excitation energy of particle 23
1
2
3q2L,f2L
q3L,f3L
q1L,f1L
V2L
V3L
V1L
VBL
23
c’ system
€
EαB + E6LiB = Ecm − E6Li* +Q2body(α −6Li)
From two body kinematics one can reconstruct the excitation energy of the intermediate 23 system.See equations for two body kinematics
Reaction p+T→1+23*→1+2+3e.g. : a+6Li→a+6Li*→a+a+d
1
2
3q2L,f2L
q3L,f3L
q1L,f1L
V2L
V3L
V1L
VBL
V23B
V23L
V1B
6Li+a6Li*+aa+d+a
E*(6Li)=2 MeV
E*(6Li)=10 MeV
Reaction p+T→1+23*→1+2+3
Q(23→2+3)E*
23
E 2-3
E2-3=E23*+Q(23→2+3)=1/2mvrel(2-3)2=1/2m(V2L-V3L)2
quantity we want to extract from the experiment
quantities to be measured
1
2
3q2L,f2L
q3L,f3L
q1L,f1L
V2L
V3L
V1L
VBL
V23B
V23L
V1B
V2L→ V2L,q2L,f2L V3L→ V3L,q3L,f3L
V2rel=(V2L –V3L)2= V2L 2+V3L
2-2 V2L● V3L
V2L● V3L = V2L V3L cosqrel=V2Lx V3Lx +V2Ly V3Ly +V2Lz V3Lz=V2Lsinq2Lcosf2L V3Lsinq3Lcosf3L +V2Lsinq2Lsinf2L V3Lsinq3Lsinf3L +V2Lcosq2L V3Lcosq3L
V3Lx= V3Lsinq3Lcosf3L
V3Ly= V3Lsinq3Lsinf3L
V3Lz= V3Lcosq3L
V2Lx= V2Lsinq2Lcosf2L
V2Ly= V2Lsinq2Lsinf2L
V2Lz= V2Lcosq2L
€
V2L =2E2L
m2
€
V3L =2E3L
m3
relLL
rel mE
mEV qcos222
3
3
2
22 -+ 32232
32*
32 21
--- - QVE relm
measured quantities energies and angles
40
Summary and conclusions
Cluster structures can be measured in various way.
Resonant elastic scattering gives the possibility to measure the excitation function in a single run without changing beam energy. Particularly useful in RIB experiments.
With this technique only unbound states can be measured and the main limitation is the minimum resonance width that can be measured.
Both single particle and cluster states can be studied with RSM.
Resonant particle spectroscopy is the most commonly used technique to study cluster structure.
Good energy and angular resolution is required.