Resina Silicona Dentina Interface

download Resina Silicona Dentina Interface

of 7

Transcript of Resina Silicona Dentina Interface

  • 7/24/2019 Resina Silicona Dentina Interface

    1/7

  • 7/24/2019 Resina Silicona Dentina Interface

    2/7

    Lopes

    et al

    ome recent dye penetration studies of packable

    umatic extraction.

    The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of

    METHOD ND M TERI LS

    A box-type Class II cavity was prepared on each

    In total, 12 cavities could be restored. The vital-

    1:100 000 epinephrine was administered.

    After the cavity preparation, a visual examination

    One cavity in each tooth (n = 6) was restored with

    ced distaUy. The bulk restorations were irradiated for

    The other six cavities were restored with Filtek

    Z250 (3M Dental), placed with an oblique Incremen-

    tal technique in three layers. Each increment was irra-

    diated with the XL 1500 curing unit for 40 seconds.

    The finishing procedures were carried out with fine

    diamond burs (Brasseler) and sandpaper strips (3M

    Dental),

    After 1 week, the teeth were carefully extracted

    with minimal trauma to the restored area. The roots

    were immediately removed by diamond bur sectioning

    under water. The teeth were cross sectioned mesiodis-

    tay through the center of the restoration with a dia-

    mond-impregnated copper disk (South Bay Tech-

    nology) in an oil-cooled low-speed cutting machine

    (Isomet. Buehler),

    A polyvinyl si loxan e impres sion (Pre siden t ,

    Coltene/Whaledent) was taken of the resin-dentin in-

    terface to control for artifacts created during the

    preparation for SEM, The specimens were subse-

    quently fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0,1-M sodium

    cacodylate huffer at pH 7,4 for at least 12 hours at

    4''C,

    After fixation, the teeth were rinsed ivith 20 mL

    of 0,2-M soditim cacodylate buffer at pH 7,4 for 1

    hour with three changes, followed by distilled water

    for 1 min ute. They were deh ydrated in ascending

    grades of ethanol (25;o for 20 minutes, 50". ) for 20

    minutes, 75 for 20 minutes, 9O''/o for 30 minutes,

    and lOO^b for 60 minutes). After the final ethanol

    step,

    the specimens were dried by immersion in hexa-

    methyldisilazane for 10 minutes'^ and air dried at

    room temperature.

    The specimens were then embedded in self-curing

    epoxy resin and stored for 12 hours. After setting, the

    epoxy casts were pohshed with waterproof sificon car-

    bide papers of decreasing abrasiveness (420, 600, and

    1,000 grit) and polished to a high gloss with soft fissue

    disks vvith increasingly fine diamond suspensions to a

    particle size of 1 pm. The specimens were washed,

    dried, demineralized in 6 N of hydrochloric acid for 30

    seconds, and deproteinized in2 sodium hypochlorite

    for 10 minutes. After drying, the specimens were sput-

    ter coated with gold-palladium by means of a Polaron

    E-5000 sputter coater (Polaron), and observed under a

    Phihps XL 30 SEM (Philips Electric),

    RESULTS

    The enamel-resin interface did not show any gap for-

    mation. The dentin-resin interface formed gaps above

    the hybrid layer in three specimens prepared with the

    bulk placement technique (Figs la and lb) and five

    specimens prepared with the incremental placement

    technique (Fig 2). Table 1 shows the percentage of gap

  • 7/24/2019 Resina Silicona Dentina Interface

    3/7

    Lopes et al

    i l a Class II cavity restored with the bulK placement technique (Filtek and P60) A gap naa formed Sequence ot the resin-denti

    face of a cavity restored w itii ttiebull* placement technique.

    For the restorafions placed with the oblique

    mental technique (Filtek and Z250), the mean ga

    mation was 6,1 , For restorations placed wit

    bulk technique (Filtek and P60), the mean gap f

    tion was 18.7 . A

    test revealed that the increm

    placement technique resuUed in a significantly

    percentage of gap formafion than did the hulk

    densadon technique.

    i 1b Gap formed at the resm-de ntii inle -ace of a

    cavity restored w ith the Puik placement rechnique.

    DISCUSSION

    The initial polymerization shrinkage of resin co

    ites,the different coefficients of therm al exp an

    this material, and dental hard tissues and adh

    problems of cervical areas are the essential facto

    sponsible for marginal leakage at the proximal as

    and gap formation at the resin-dentin interfa

  • 7/24/2019 Resina Silicona Dentina Interface

    4/7

    Lopes el al

    2 Class II cavity restored with the incremental placement te clinique (Fiftek and Z250). There is no gap formation. Sequence of trie

    tir interface ot a cavity restored by incrementat piacement techn ique.

    can reach 2.6% to 7.1% on light-cured

    ed by many au tho rs. ^ ^ Layering resin com posite

    ty walls.^'

    The reason for the lesser amount of gap formation

    Class II resin composite restoration is in the range

    .0 to 2.0 when the bulk technique is use d. The in-

    prep aratio n. Increm ental restoration techniques

    T BLE

    Gap percentage by placement technique

    and resin composite

    Specimen

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Mean

    Incremental

    Z250 ( )

    0.0

    6.7

    0.0

    0.0

    7.4

    2Z.4

    6,1

    Bulk

    P (

    0.0

    17.3

    23.8

    35.4

    18,9

    26.9

    18.7

    The incremental technique can incorporate air bub-

    bles. Alster et a P have shown that the stress relief in

    thin resin increments is proportional to the amount of

  • 7/24/2019 Resina Silicona Dentina Interface

    5/7

    L o D e s

    et l

    contributes to stress reduction. - Tbe role of air incor-

    poration in the stress relief of resin composite seems

    to be important and should be investigated furtber.

    Altbough tbe incremental layering tecbnique bas

    been widely advocated for reduction of polymerization

    sbrinkage, reports and recent finite element analyses

    now dispute this tbeory. ' In one of tbese studies, it

    was concluded that layering resin composites results

    in bigher overall sbrinkage stress and deformation of

    remaining bard tissue walls.- Tbe autbors pointed out,

    bowever, tbat tbe incremental tecbnique still has some

    advantages over bulk placement, sucb as improved

    marginal adaptation and wetting,-' wbicb was, in part,

    confirmed in tbe present study.

    Tbe incremental placement technique is still re-

    garded as tbe most practical for otber reasons as well.

    This procedure provides enbanced control of over-

    bangs in tbe lateral margins prior to curing^ and a

    more effective and uniform cure. ^

    The present results are in agreement witb recent re-

    searcb conducted in vivo, in wbicb tbere was signif-

    cantly more gap formation at tbe dentin-restoration

    interface, and postoperative sensitivity, after bulk

    placement tban after restorations were applied in lay-

    ers.''

    In botb studies, neither tecbnique resulted in a

    perfectly sealed interface between tbe restoration and

    tbe tootb structure. Tbe bigh modulus of elasticity of

    tbe bybrid resin composites probably could not relieve

    tbe stress produced during polymerization. Furtber in-

    vestigations should be conducted in vivo with an in-

    termediate layer of tlowable resin composite, because

    the use of a low-modulus resin composite may in-

    crease the flexibility of the bonded assembly and may

    act as stress-relaxation buffers, absorbing tbe tension

    stress induced by polymerization of tbe resin compos-

    ite placed over tbe resin. ' ^

    CONCLUSION

    Within tbe limitations of tbis short-term study, it is

    concluded that tbe placement tecbnique is an impor-

    tant factor wben posterior teetb are restored witb

    resin composites. Tbe incremental placement of poste-

    rior composites stili provides better seal than does tbe

    new bulk condensation technique.

    REFERENCES

    1. Neiva IF, deAndrada MAC, Baratieri LN, M onteiro SJr,

    Ritter

    AV.

    An in vitro studyofeffectofrestorative technique

    on marginal leakage

    in

    posterior composites. Oper Dent

    1998;23:282-289.

    16 .

    18 .

    Opdam NJM, Rocters FJM, Peilzer AJ, Verdonscho

    Marginal integrity

    and

    postoperative sensitivity

    in

    C

    resin composite restoration

    in

    vivo.

    J

    Dent 19

    555-562.

    BuUard RH, Leinfelder KP, Russell CM. Effect

    of

    coe

    of thermal expansion

    on

    microleakage.

    J Am

    Dent

    1988,116;871-874.

    Opdam NJM, Peilzer A], Roeters JJM, Smale

    I.

    Clas

    clusai composite resin restorations:

    in

    vivo post-op

    sensitivity, wall adaptation

    and

    microleakage. Am

    1998;11:229-234.

    Manhar t

    J,

    Kunzelmann

    K-H,

    Chen

    HY,

    Hic

    Mechanical properties

    and

    wear hehavior

    of

    light

    packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000;16;33-40

    Fortin

    D,

    Vargas MA. The spectrum

    of

    composites

    techniques

    and

    materials.

    J Am

    Dent Assoc 200

    26S-30S.

    Affleck

    MS,

    Denehy

    GE,

    Vargas

    MA,

    Setie

    Microleakage with incremental vs. bulk placement ut

    condensable composites [abstract 393].

    J

    Dent Res

    78:155.

    Paler TA, Mazer RB. Marginal adaptation of conde

    composite restorative [abstract 392].JDentRes 1

    154.

    Miranda WGJr,Nunes MP, Cardoso PEC, Sant

    Microleakage

    of

    condensable composite resins with

    able composite [abstract 1603]. J Dent Res 1999;78:30

    Moldovan

    S,

    M onoghan

    P,

    Seghi

    R.

    Therm o stress

    croleakage

    of

    hybridized Class

    II

    esthetic dental r

    tions [abstract

    2265].

    J Dent Res 1999;78:389.

    Pashley DH.

    In

    vitro simulations

    of in

    vivo bonding

    tions. Am

    Dent 1990;4:237-240.

    Perdiglo

    J,

    Lam brechts

    P, Van

    Meerbeek

    B,

    Vanhe

    LopesAB.Pield emission SEM comparison of four po

    ation drying techniques

    for

    human dentin.

    J

    Biomed

    Res 1996:29:1111-1120.

    Schuckar

    M,

    Geurtsen W. Proximo-cervical adap ta

    Class Il-composite restorations after thermoeycling:

    titative

    and

    qualitative study.

    J

    Oral R ehabil 19

    766-775.

    DeGee A , Davidson

    CL,

    Smith AA. Modified dila

    of continuous recording of volumetric polymerization

    kage

    of

    composite restorative materiais.

    |

    Dent 1

    36-42.

    Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contrac

    compositesandglass ionom er cemen ts.J Prosthe

    1988;59:297-300.

    Eick JD, WelchPH,Polymerization shrinkageofpo

    composite resin anditspossible influenceonpostop

    sensitivity. QuintessenceInt1986;17:103-lll.

    Hassan K, Mantc F, List G, Dhuru

    V.

    A modified inc

    tal filling technique forClassII composite restorat

    Prosthet Dent 1987;58:153-156.

    Hilton

    TJ.

    Direct Posterior Compo site R estorati

    Schwartz RS, Summit JB, Robbins JW {eds . Fundam

    of Operative Dentistry-A New Contemporary App

    Chicago: Quintessence, 1996 :207-228.

    Lsche GM. M arginal adaptation

    of

    Class

    II

    compos

    ings: Guided polymerization

    vs.

    reduced light inte

    Adhesive Dent 1999;l:31-39.

  • 7/24/2019 Resina Silicona Dentina Interface

    6/7

    Lopeset al

    Tlan AHL, Bergh BH. Lidner

    C.

    Effect o various incremen-

    ta techniques

    on the

    marginal adaptation

    of

    Class

    com-

    posite resin restorations. Prosthet Dent 1992;67:62-66.

    Lutz F. Krejci 1, Barbakow F. Quahty and durabilityofmar-

    ginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent

    Mater 1991:7:107-113.

    Feiizer AJ,DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stressinresin

    composite in relation

    to

    the configuration of the restoration .

    Dent Res 1987 ;66:1656-1639.

    Carvaiho RM. Pereira JC. Yoshiyama M. Pashiey DH. A

    re-

    view

    of

    polymerization contraction:

    the

    influence

    of

    stress

    development versus stressrelief.Oper Dent 1996:21:17-24.

    Alster D, Feiizer AJ, DeGee AJ, Mol A. The dependence

    of

    shrinkage stress reduction on porosity concentration in thin

    resin layers. J Dent Res 1992;71:1619-1622.

    Versluis A. Douglas WH. Cross M. Sakaguchi RL. Does

    an

    incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrink-

    age stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75:871-878.

    VTmkler MM, Katona TR, Paydar NH. Finite element stress

    analysis

    of

    three fifling techniques

    for

    Class

    V

    light-cured

    composite restorations. J Dent Res 1996:75:1477-1483.

    27 Baratieri LN, Ritter

    AV,

    Perdigao J, Felippe tA.Direct pos-

    terior composite resin restorations: current conceptsfor the

    technique. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1998;10:

    875-886.

    28. Versluis A, Tanthirojn D. Douglas WH .Dodental compos-

    ites always shrink toward thelight? J Dent Res 1998;77:

    1435-1445.

    29.

    lap

    AUJ, Wang HB, Siow KS,

    Gan

    LM. Polymerization

    strength

    of

    visible-light-cured comp osites. Oper Dent

    2000;25:98-103.

    30.

    Kemp-Scholte CM. Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal

    of Class

    V

    resin com posite re stora tions effected

    by in-

    creased

    flexibility.

    J Dent Res 1990;69:1240-1243.

    31.

    Van

    Meerbeek

    B

    Lambrechts

    P

    lnokoshi

    S

    Braem

    M

    Vanberie

    G.

    Factors affeeting adhesion

    to

    mineralized

    tis-

    sues. Oper Dent 1992;17:111-124.

    lFE D o rg

    w w w i f e d

    .org

    of Esthetic Dentistry

    Visit the IFED website www.ifed.org that brings

    together under one umbrella all esthetic dentistry

    academies and esthetic dental clinicians around

    the world.

    updated information on upcoming meetings

    important links journals and new products related to

    the esthetic dentistry world.

    more about worldwide academies of Esthetic

    Dentistry and connect directiy with their Executive

    Councils.

    f

    C h ar g e

    monthlyF E Dnewsletter and

    updated news on esthetic dentistry directly to your

    email if you subscribe to the IFED website today.

    FiND all the details of the 4th IFED World Congress

    hosted by the EAED 27-29 May 2004 in Venice Italy.

  • 7/24/2019 Resina Silicona Dentina Interface

    7/7