Research References: Validity & Reliability References...

Jennifer Docktor [[email protected]] 04/07/08

Research References:

Jump To:

• Validity & Reliability References

• Rubric Construction References

• Problem Solving References

Validity & Reliability References: [top of page]

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National

Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and

psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Razavieh, A. (1985). Introduction to research in education (3rd ed.).

New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

[pp. 138-155, Sampling; pp. 213-240, Validity & Reliability]

Banerjee, M., Capozzoli, M., McSweeney, L., & Sinha, D. (1999). Beyond kappa: A review of

interrater agreement measures. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27(1), 3-23.

Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.). White Plains,

NY: Longman. [pp.213-242, populations and samples; pp. 245-263, validity & reliability]

Cicchetti, D.V., & Fleiss, J.L. (1977). Comparison of the null distributions of weighted kappa

and the C ordinal statistic. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 195-201.

Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled

disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213-220.


Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). New

York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.

Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions.

Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Fleiss, J.L., & Cohen, J. (1973). The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass

correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educational and Psychological

Measurement, 33, 613-619.

Gay, L.R. (1981). Educational research: Competencies for analysis & application. Columbus,

Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.

Howell, D.C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Thomson

Learning, Inc.

Kane, M.T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3),

527-535.

Kane, M.T. (2001). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement,

38(4), 319-342.

Linn, R.L., Baker, E.L., & Dunbar, S.B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment:

Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 15-21.

Lohr, S.L. (1999). Sampling: Design and analysis. Pacific Grove, California: Brooks/Cole

Publishing Company.

Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance


assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.

Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’

responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American

Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749.

Moss, P.A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for

performance assessment. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 229-258.


Rubric Construction References: [top of document]

Arter, J., & McTighe, J. (2001). Scoring rubrics in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, California:

Corwin Press, Inc.

Bargainnier, S. (2003). Fundamentals of rubrics. Retrieved September 14, 2007 from the

University of Idaho Enriched Learning Environment Project web site:

http://www.webs1.uidaho.edu/enrich/Spring_04_ws/Tool_Design/Methods/Using_Rubri

cs.pdf

Baughin, J.A., Brod, E.F., & Page, D.L. (2002). Primary trait analysis: A tool for classroom-

based assessments. College Teaching, 50(2), 75-80.

Ebel, R.L. (1982). Proposed solution to two problems of test construction. Journal of

Educational Measurement, 19(4), 267-278.

Ebert-May, D. (1999). Scoring rubrics for written assignments and oral presentations. Retrieved

March 28, 2007, from University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science

Education Field-tested Learning Assessment Guide Web site:

http://www.flaguide.org/cat/rubrics/rubrics1.php

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2003). Does your assessment support your students’ learning?

Journal of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 1-27 (?).

Mertler, C.A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment,

Research & Evaluation, 7(25).

Montgomery, K. (2002). Authentic tasks and rubrics: Going beyond traditional assessments in

college teaching. College Teaching, 50(1), 34-39.


Murthy, S. (2007). Peer-assessment of homework using rubrics. Proceedings of the 2007 Physics

Education Research Conference (pp. 156-159). Melville, NY: American Institute of

Physics.

Quellmalz, E.S. (1991). Developing criteria for performance assessments: The missing link.

Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 319-331.


Problem-Solving References: [top of document]

Abel, C.F. (2003). Heuristics and problem solving. New Directions for Teaching and Learning,

95, 53-58.

Adelson, B. (1984). When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with

expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10,

483-495.

Alexander, P.A. (2003). The development of expertise: The Journey from acclimation to

proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10-14.

Anderson, J.R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions.

Psychological Review, 94(2), 192-210.

Anzai, Y. & Yokoyama, T. (1984). Internal models in physics problem solving. Cognition and

Instruction, 1(4), 397-450.

Arons, A.B. (1976). Cultivating the capacity for formal reasoning: Objectives and procedures in

an introductory physical science course. American Journal of Physics, 44(9), 834-838.

Arons, A.B. (1990). A guide to introductory physics teaching. New York: Wiley.

[Chapter 13: Critical Thinking, pp.313-327]

Bagno, E., & Eylon, B. (1997). From problem solving to knowledge structure: An example from

the domain of electromagnetism. American Journal of Physics, 65(8), 726-736.

Bassok, M. (1990). Transfer of domain-specific problem-solving procedures. Journal of

Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16(3), 522-533.


Bédard, Jean, & Chi, M.T.H. (1992). Expertise. Current Directions in Psychological Science,

1(4), 135-139.

Bhaskar, R., & Simon, H.A. (1989). Problem solving in semantically rich domains: An example

from engineering thermodynamics. In H.A. Simon (Ed.), Models of thought vol. 2 (pp.

197-214). New Haven: Yale University Press. (Reprinted from Cognitive Science, 1, pp.

193-215, 1977)

Bing, T., & Redish, E.F. (2006). The cognitive blending of mathematics and physics knowledge.

Proceedings of the 2006 Physics Education Research Conference, (pp. XX-XX).

Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics.

Blue, J. M. (1997). Sex differences in physics learning and evaluations in an introductory

course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

Bolton, J., Keynes, M., & Ross, S. (1997). Developing students’ physics problem-solving skills.

Physics Education, 32(3), 176-185.

Carney, A. (2006, October). What do we want our students to learn? Transform, 1, 1-6.

Champagne, A.B., Gunstone, R.F., & Klopfer, L.E. (1982). A perspective on the differences

between expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Research in Science

Education, 12, 71-77.

Champagne, A.B., Klopfer, L.E., & Anderson, J.H. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of

classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48(12), 1074-1079.

Chase, W.G., & Simon, H.A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.

Chi, M.T.H. (1985). Interactive roles of knowledge and strategies in the development of


organized sorting and recall. In S.F. Chipman, J.W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking

and learning skills vol. 2: Research and open questions (pp. 457-483). Hillsdale, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Chi, M.T.H. (1996). Constructing self-explanations and scaffolded explanations in tutoring.

Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, S33-S49.

Chi, M.T.H. (2006). Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics. In K.A. Ericsson,

N. Charness, R.R. Hoffman, & P.J. Feltovich (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of

expertise and expert performance (pp. 21-30). New York, NY: Cambridge University

Press.

Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations:

How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science,

13(2), 145-182.

Chi, M.T.H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M.H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations

improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.

Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics

problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.

Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.)

Advances in the psychology of human intelligence vol. 1 (pp. 7-75). Hillsdale, NJ:

Erlbaum.

Chi, M.T.H., & VanLehn, K.A. (1991). The content of physics self-explanations. The Journal of

the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 69-105.

Clement, J.J. (1979). Mapping a student’s causal conceptions from a problem-solving protocol.

In J. Lochhead & J. Clement (Eds.), Cognitive process instruction: Research on teaching

thinking skills (pp. 133-146). Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.


Clement, J. (1988). Observed methods for generating analogies in scientific problem solving.

Cognitive Science, 12, 563-586.

Clement, J.J. (1998). Expert novice similarities and instruction using analogies. International

Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1271-1286.

Cohen, E., & Kanim, S.E. (2004). Algebraic difficulties in physics. Retrieved September 9,

2007, from New Mexico State University, Space Grant Consortium web site:

http://spacegrant.nmsu.edu/NMSU/2004/cohen.pdf

Cohen, E., & Kanim, S.E. (2005). Factors influencing the algebra “reversal error”. American

Journal of Physics, 73(11), 1072-1078.

Davidson, J.E. (2003). Insights about insightful problem solving. In J. E. Davidson & R. J.

Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 149-175). Cambridge, UK:

Cambridge University Press.

Davidson, J.E., Deuser, R., & Sternberg, R.J. (1994). The role of metacognition in problem

solving. In Metcalfe & Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition (pp. 207-226). Cambridge:

MIT press.

Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2003). The psychology of problem solving.

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. (1986). Cognitive structures of good and poor novice

problem solvers in physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 279-288.

de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. (1991). Knowledge of problem situations in physics:

A comparison of good and poor novice problem solvers. Learning and Instruction, 1,

289-302.

de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge.

Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105-113.


De Mul, F.F.M., Batlle, C.M.I., De Bruijn, I., & Rinzema, K. (2004). How to encourage

university students to solve physics problems requiring mathematical skills: The

‘adventurous problem solving’ approach. European Journal of Physics, 25(1), 51-61.

Dhillon, A.S. (1998). Individual differences within problem-solving strategies used in physics.

Science Education, 82, 379-405.

diSessa, A.A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2/3),

105-225.

Dominowski, R.L., & Bourne, Jr., L.E. (1994). History of research on thinking and problem

solving. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and Problem Solving (pp. 1-35). San Diego:

Academic Press, Inc.

Donald, J.G. (1991). The learning task in engineering courses: A study of professors’ perceptions

of the learning process in six selected courses. European Journal of Engineering

Education, 16(2), 181-192.

Donald, J.G. (1992). Professors’ and students’ conceptualizations of the learning task in

engineering courses. European Journal of Engineering Education, 17(3), 229-245.

Dreyfus, H.L., & Dreyfus, S.E. (1986). Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.

[Chapter 1 “Five Steps from Novice to Expert” pp. 16-51]

Driver, R., & Warrington, L. (1985). Students’ use of the principle of energy conservation in

problem situations. Physics Education, 20, 171-176.

Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., & Allen, D.E. (2001). The power of problem-based learning. Sterling,

Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC.

Dufresne, R.J., Gerace, W.J., & Leonard, W.J. (1997). Solving physics problems with multiple

representations. The Physics Teacher, 35, 270-275.

Dufresne, R.J., Gerace, W.J., Hardiman, P.T., & Mestre, J.P. (1992). Constraining novices to


perform expertlike problem analyses: Effects on schema acquisition. Journal of the

Learning Sciences, 2(3), 307–331.

Dufresne, R.J., Leonard, W.J., & Gerace, W.J. (February, 1995) A qualitative model for the

storage of domain-specific knowledge and its implications for problem-solving. Physics

Education Research Group. University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Retrieved on March

26, 2007 from http://umperg.physics.umass.edu/topics/model/

Elio, R., & Scharf, P.B. (1990). Modeling novice-to-expert shifts in problem-solving strategy

and knowledge organization. Cognitive Science, 14(4), 579-639.

Ericsson, K.A. (2003). The acquisition of expert performance as problem solving: Construction

and modification of mediating mechanisms through deliberate practice. In J. E. Davidson

& R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 31-86). Cambridge,

UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ericsson, K.A. (2006). Protocol analysis and expert thought: Concurrent verbalizations of

thinking during experts’ performance on representative tasks. In K.A. Ericsson, N.

Charness, R.R. Hoffman, & P.J. Feltovich (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise

and expert performance (pp. 223-242). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Etkina, E., Van Heuvelen, A.V., White-Brahmia, S., Brookes, D.T., Gentile, M., Murthy, S., et

al. (2006). Scientific abilities and their assessment. Physical Review Special Topics –

Physics Education Research, 2(020103), 1-15.

Eylon, B., & Reif, F. (1984). Effects of knowledge organization on task performance. Cognition

and Instruction, 1(1), 5-44.

Farnham-Diggory, S. (1994). Paradigms of knowledge and instruction. Review of Educational

Research, 64(3), 463-477.

Feldon, D.F. (2007). The implications of research on expertise for curriculum and pedagogy.


Educational Psychology Review, 19, 91-110.

Feltovich, P.J., Prietula, M.J., & Ericsson, K.A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological

perspectives. In K.A. Ericsson, N. Charness, R.R. Hoffman, & P.J. Feltovich (Eds.), The

Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41-68). New York, NY:

Cambridge University Press.

Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M., & de Jong, T. (1987). On the quality of knowledge in the field of

electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 55(6), 492-497.

Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M., & de Jong, T. (1990). Studying physics texts: Differences in study

processes between good and poor performers. Cognition and Instruction, 7(1), 41-54.

Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M., & de Jong, T. (1993). Does physics instruction foster university

students’ cognitive processes?: A descriptive study of teacher activities. Journal of

Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 681-696.

Finegold, M., & Mass, R. (1985). Differences in the process of solving physics problems

between good problem solvers and poor problem solvers. Research in Science and

Technology Education, 3, 59-67.

Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), The

nature of intelligence (pp. 231-235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-

developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

Foster, T. (2000). The development of students' problem-solving skills from instruction

emphasizing qualitative problem-solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University

of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

Frederiksen, N. (1984). Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving.

Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 363-407.


French, J.N., & Rhoder, C. (1992). Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. New York:

Garland Publishing Inc. [pp. 151-182: Problem solving and decision making]

Frensch, P.A., & Sternberg, R.J. (1991). Skill-related differences in game playing. In R.J.

Sternberg & P.A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms

(pp. 343-381). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gaigher, E., Rogan, J.M., & Braun, M.W.H. (2007). Exploring the development of conceptual

understanding through structured problem-solving in physics. International Journal of

Science Education, 29(9), 1089-1110.

Garofalo, J., & Lester, F.K. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical

performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163-176.

Ge, X., & Er, N. (2005). An online support system to scaffold real-world problem solving.

Interactive Learning Environments, 13(3), 139-157.

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science,

7, 155-170.

Gentner, D., & Markman, A.B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American


Gerace, W.J., & Beatty, I.D. (2005, February). Teaching vs. learning: Changing perspectives on

problem solving in physics instruction. Paper presented at the 9th Common Conference of

the Cyprus Physics Association and Greek Physics Association, Nicosia, Cyprus.

Gick, M.L. (1986). Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21(1 & 2), 99-120.

Goldstein, I.P., & Brown, J.S. (1979). The computer as a personal assistant for learning. In J.

Lochhead & J. Clement (Eds.), Cognitive process instruction: Research on teaching

thinking skills (pp. 201-207). Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.

Grayson, D.J., & McDermott, L. C. (1996). Use of the computer for research on student thinking


in physics. American Journal of Physics, 64(5), 557-565.

Green, B.F., McCloskey, M., & Caramazza, A. (1985). The relation of knowledge to problem

solving, with examples from kinematics. In S.F. Chipman, J.W. Segal, & R. Glaser

(Eds.), Thinking and learning skills vol. 2: Research and open questions (pp. 141-159).

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc

Greenfield, L.B. (1979). Engineering student problem solving. In J. Lochhead & J. Clement

(Eds.), Cognitive process instruction: Research on teaching thinking skills (pp. 229-238).

Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.

Hallabaugh, M. (1995). Physics problem-solving in cooperative learning groups. Unpublished

doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

Halloun, I.A. (1996). Schematic modeling for meaningful learning of physics. Journal of

Research in Science Teaching, 33(9), ??-??.

Halloun, I.A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). The initial knowledge state of college physics students.

American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043-1055.

Hambrick, D.Z., & Engle, R.W. (2003). The role of working memory in problem solving. In J.

E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 176-206).


Harper, K.A. (2006). Student problem-solving behaviors. The Physics Teacher, 44(4), 250-251.

Harskamp, E., & Ding, N. (2006). Structured collaboration versus individual learning in solving

physics problems. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1669-1688.

Hassebrock, F., Johnson, P.E., Bullemer, P., Fox, P.W., & Moller, J.H. (1993). When less is

more: Representation and selective memory in expert problem solving. The American

Journal of Psychology, 106(2), 155-189.


Hayes, J.R. (1985). Three problems in teaching general skills. In S.F. Chipman, J.W. Segal, & R.

Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills vol. 2 (pp. 391-405). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Hayes, J.R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates.

Hayes-Roth, B., & Hayes-Roth, F. (1979). A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive Science, 3,

275-310.

Hegarty, M. (1991). Knowledge and processes in mechanical problem solving. In R.J. Sternberg

& P.A. Frensch (Eds.), Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 253-

285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hegarty, M., Mayer, R.E., & Monk, C.A. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems:

A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of Educational

Psychology, 87(1), 18–32.

Heller, J. I., & Reif, F. (1984). Prescribing effective human problem-solving processes: Problem

description in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 177-216.

Heller, K., & Heller, P. (2000). The competent problem solver for introductory physics. Boston:

McGraw-Hill.

Heller, K., & Heller, P. (2006). Instructor’s handbook: A guide for TAs. University of

Minnesota, Department of Physics.

Heller, P., Heller, K., & Kuo, V. (2004, January). Procedure for setting goals for an introductory

physics course. Contributed talk presented at the meeting of the American Association of

Physics Teachers, Miami Beach, FL.

Heller, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping.


Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60(7),

637-644.

Heller, P., Keith, R., & Anderson, S. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative

grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics,

60(7), 627-636.

Henderson, C. (2002). Faculty conceptions about the teaching and learning of problem solving

in introductory calculus-based physics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of

Minnesota, Twin Cities.

Henderson, C., Yerushalmi, E., Kuo, V.H., Heller, P., & Heller, K. (2004). Grading student

problem solutions: The challenge of sending a consistent message. American Journal of

Physics, 72(2), 164-169.

Hewitt, P.G. (1983). Millikan lecture 1982: The missing essential – a conceptual understanding

of physics. American Journal of Physics, 51(4), 305-311.

Heywood, J. (2005). Engineering education: Research and development in curriculum and

instruction. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [Chapter 10: Problem

Solving pp. 243-260]

Hoellwarth, C., Moelter, M.J., & Knight, R.D. (2005). A direct comparison of conceptual

learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms. American


Holyoak, K.J., Junn, E.N., & Billman, D.O. (1984). Development of analogical problem-solving

skill. Child Development, 55(6), 2042-2055.

Hsu, L., Brewe, E., Foster, T. M., & Harper, K. A. (2004). Resource letter RPS-1: Research in

problem solving. American Journal of Physics, 72(9), 1147-1156.

Hudson, H.T., & McIntire, W.R. (1977). Correlation between mathematical skills and success in


physics. American Journal of Physics, 45(5), 470-471.

Huffman, D. (1997). Effect of explicit problem solving instruction on high school students’

problem-solving performance and conceptual understanding of physics. Journal of

Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 551-570.

Hung, W., & Jonassen, D.H. (2006). Conceptual understanding of causal reasoning in physics.

International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1601-1621.

Hunt, E. (1994). Problem solving. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp.

215-232). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.

Johnson, M. (2001). Facilitating high quality student practice in introductory physics. American

Journal of Physics, Physics Education Research Supplement, 69(7), S2-S11.

Jonassen, D.H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured

problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research & Development,

45(1), 65-94.

Jonassen, D. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on

Technology in Education, 35(3), 362-381.

Kalyuga, S. (2006). Rapid cognitive assessment of learners’ knowledge structures. Learning and


Kim, E., & Pak, S. (2002). Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000

traditional problems. American Journal of Physics, 70(7), 759-765.

Klenk, M., & Forbus, K. (2006, July). Analogical model formulation for AP physics problems.

Paper presented at the 20th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, Hannover,

NH.

Klenk, M., & Forbus, K. (2007a). Cognitive modeling of analogy events in physics problem

solving from examples. In The Proceedings of CogSci-07, Nashville, TN.


Klenk, M., & Forbus, K. (2007b). Measuring the level of transfer learning by an AP physics

problem-solver. In The Proceedings of AAAI-07: Twenty-second conference on Artificial

Intelligence, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Koch, A., & Eckstein, S.G. (1995). Skills needed for reading comprehension of physics texts and

their relation to problem-solving ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(6),

613-628.

Koplowitz, H. (1979). The feeling of knowing when one has solved a problem. In J. Lochhead &

J. Clement (Eds.), Cognitive process instruction: Research on teaching thinking skills

(pp. 305-307). Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.

Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science,

9(5), 178-181.

Kuo, V. (2004). An explanatory model of physics faculty conceptions about the problem-solving

process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

LaFrance, M. (1989, April). The quality of expertise: Implications of expert-novice differences

for knowledge acquisition. ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence

(SIGART) Newsletter, 108, 6-14.

Lapp, C.J. (1940). The effectiveness of mathematical versus physical solutions in problem

solving in college physics. American Journal of Physics, 8, 241-243.

Lapp, C.J. (1941). The effectiveness of problem solving in producing achievement in college

physics. American Journal of Physics, 9, 239-241.

Larkin, J.H. (1979a). Information processing models and science instruction. In J. Lochhead & J.

Clement (Eds.), Cognitive process instruction: Research on teaching thinking skills (pp.

109-118). Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.

Larkin, J. H. (1979b). Processing information for effective problem solving. Engineering


Education, 70(3), 285-288.

Larkin, J. H. (1980). Teaching problem solving in physics: the psychological laboratory and the

practical classroom. In D. T. Tuma & F. Reif (Eds.), Problem solving and education:

issues in teaching and research (pp. 111-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates.

Larkin, J.H. (1981a). Cognition of learning physics. American Journal of Physics, 49(6), 534-

541.

Larkin, J.H. (1981b). Enriching formal knowledge: A model for learning to solve textbook

physics problems. In J.R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 311-

334). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Larkin, J.H. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics. In D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens

(Eds.), Mental models (pp. 75-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Larkin, J.H. (1985). Understanding, problem representations, and skill in physics. In S.F.

Chipman, J.W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills vol. 2: Research

and open questions (pp. 141-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Larkin, J.H., McDermott, J., Simon, D.P., & Simon, H.A. (1980a). Expert and novice

performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208(4450), 1335-1342.

Larkin, J.H., McDermott, J., Simon, D.P., & Simon, H.A. (1980b). Models of competence in

solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4, 317-345.

Larkin, J. H., & Reif, F. (1979). Understanding and teaching problem solving in physics.

European Journal of Science Education, 1(2), 191-203.

Larkin, J.H., & Simon, H.A. (1989). Learning through growth of skill in mental modeling. In


H.A. Simon (Ed.), Models of thought vol. 2 (pp. 134-144). New Haven: Yale University

Press. (Reprinted from Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive

Science Society, Berkeley: Cognitive Science Society, 1981).

Larkin, J.H., & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words.

Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.

Lavoie, B. (2003). The development and validation of the biotechnology problem-solving skills

assessment for community college biotechnology students. Unpublished doctoral

dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

Laws, P. (1991). Calculus-based physics without lectures. Physics Today, 44(12), 24-31.

Lehavi, Y., & Galili, I. (2003, August). What do we ask? Analysis of questions in physics

textbooks and final examinations. Paper presented at the 4th meeting of the European

Science Education Research Association, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.

Leinhardt, G., & Schwarz, B.B. (1997). Seeing the problem: An explanation from Pόlya.

Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 395-434.

Leonard, W.J., Dufresne, R.J., & Mestre, J.P. (1996). Using qualitative problem-solving

strategies to highlight the role of conceptual knowledge in solving problems. American


Leonard, W.J., Gerace, W.J., & Dufresne, R.J. (2002). Analysis-based problem solving: Making

analysis and reasoning the focus of physics instruction. Science Teaching, 20, 387-400.

Lerman, N. (1964). Open-ended problem instruction in general physics. American Journal of

Physics, 32, 927-936.

Lewis, R.A., Harper, B.M., & Wilson, M. (1991). Computer assignments and problems classes

for physics students. Computers & Education, 16(4), 349-362.

Lubart, T.I., & Mouchiroud, C. (2003).Creativity: A source of difficulty in problem solving. In J.


E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 127-148).


Maloney, D.P. (1978). Group problem-solving sessions in PSI physics courses. American


Maloney, D.P. (1984). Rule-goverened approaches to physics: Newton’s third law. Physics

Education, 19, 37-42.

Maloney, D.P. (1993). Research on problem solving: Physics. In D.L. Gabel (Ed.) Handbook of

research on science teaching and learning (pp. 327-356). New York: Macmillan.

Marshall, S.P. (1988). Assessing problem solving: A short-term remedy and a long-term

solution. In R.I. Charles & E.A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of

mathematical problem solving vol. 3 (pp. 159-177). Reston, VA: The National Council of

Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. (& Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)

Martinez, M. E. (1998). What is problem solving? Phi Delta Kappan, 79(8), 605-609.

Mayer, R.E. (1982). Different problem solving strategies for algebra word and equation

problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8,

448-462.

Mayer, R.E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition (2nd ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman

and Company.

Mayer, R.E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving.

Instructional Science, 26, 49-63.

Mayer, R.E., & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of

Educational Psychology, 82, 715-726.

Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

McDermott, L.C. (1990). Research and computer-based instruction: Opportunity for interaction.



McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource letter: PER-1: Physics education research.


McMartin, F., McKenna, A., & Youssefi, K. (2000). Scenario assignments as assessment tools

for undergraduate engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(2), 111-

119.

McMillan, C., & Swadener, M. (1991). Novice use of qualitative versus quantitative problem

solving in electrostatics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 661-670.

McNamara, T.P. (1994). Knowledge representation. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and

Problem Solving (pp. 81-117). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.

Meltzer, D.E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning

gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American


Meltzer, D.E. (2005). Relation between students’ problem-solving performance and

representational format. American Journal of Physics, 73(5), 463-478.

Mestre, J.P., Dufresne, R.J., Gerace, W.J., Hardiman, P.T., & Touger, J.S. (1993). Promoting

skilled problem-solving behavior among beginning physics students. Journal of Research

in Science Teaching, 30(3), 303-317.

Mettes, C.T.C.W., Pilot, A., & Roossink, H.J. (1981). Linking factual and procedural knowledge

in solving science problems: A case study in thermodynamics course. Instructional

Science, 10, 333-361.

Neto, A.J., & Valente, M.O. (1997, March). Problem solving in physics: Toward a

metacognitively developed approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the

National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook, IL.


Newell, A., Shaw, J.D., & Simon, H.A. (1989). Elements of a theory of human problem solving.

In H.A. Simon (Ed.) Mental models vol. 2 (pp. 6-19). New Haven: Yale University Press.

(Reprinted from Psychological Review, 65, pp. 151-166, 1958)

Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-

Hall, Inc.

Newell, J.A., Dahm, K.D., & Newell, H.L. (2002). Rubric development and inter-rater reliability

issues in assessing learning outcomes. Chemical Engineering Education, 36(3) 212-215.

Nguyen, N., & Meltzer, D.E. (2003). Initial understanding of vector concepts among students in

introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 71(6), 630-638.

Nickerson, R.S. (1994). The teaching of thinking and problem solving. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.),

Thinking and Problem Solving (pp. 409-449). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.

Novick, L.R. (1990). Representational transfer in problem solving. Psychological Science, 1(2),

128-132.

Ogilvie, C.A. (2007). Moving students from simple to complex problem solving. In D.H.

Jonassen (Ed.), Learning to solve complex scientific problems (pp. 159-185). New York:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Taylor Francis Group, LLC.

Omasta, E., & Lunetta, V.N. (1988). Exploring functions: A strategy for teaching physics

concepts and problem-solving. Science Education, 72(5), 625-636.

Ormrod, J. E. (2004). Human learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education,

Inc.

Park, J. (2004). Analysing cognitive or non-cognitive factors involved in the process of physics

problem-solving in everyday context. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13),

1577-1595.

Peters, P.C. (1982). Even honors students have conceptual difficulties with physics. American


Journal of Physics, 50, 501-508.

Ploetzner, R., Fehse, E., Kneser, C., & Spada, H. (1999). Learning to relate qualitative and

quantitative problem representations in a model-based setting for collaborative problem

solving. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(2), 177-214.

Ploetzner, R., & VanLehn, K. (1997). The acquisition of qualitative physics knowledge during

textbook-based physics training. Cognition and Instruction, 15(2), 169-205.

Pol, H., Harskamp, E., & Suhre, C. (2005). Solving physics problems with the help of computer-

assisted instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 451-469.

Polson, P., & Jeffries, R. (1982). Problem solving as search and understanding. In R.J. Sternberg

(Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence vol. 1 (pp. 367-411). Hillsdale,

NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pόlya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Pretz, J. E., Naples, A. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Recognizing, defining, and representing

problems. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving

(pp. 3-30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Priest, A.G., & Lindsay, R.O. (1992). New light on novice-expert differences in physics problem

solving. British Journal of Psychology, 83(3), 389-405.

Redish, E.F. (1994). Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics. American Journal of

Physics, 62(9), 796-803.

Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching physics with the physics suite. Hoboken, NJ: Johns Wiley &

Sons, Inc.

Redish, E.F. (2005). Problem solving and the use of math in physics courses. Proceedings of the

conference World View on Physics Education in 2005: Focusing on Change, Delhi,

August 21-26, 2005.


Redish, E. F., Scherr, R. E., & Tuminaro, J. (2006). Reverse engineering the solution of a

“simple” physics problem: Why learning physics is harder than it looks. The Physics

Teacher, 44(5), 293-300.

Reif, F. (1981). Teaching problem solving – A scientific approach. The Physics Teacher, 19(5),

310-316.

Reif, F. (1995). Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought

processes. American Journal of Physics, 63(1), 17-32.

Reif, F. (1996). Guest comment: Standards and measurement in physics – why not physics

education? American Journal of Physics, 64(6), 687-688.

Reif, F., & Heller, J.I. (1982). Knowledge structure and problem solving in physics. Educational


Reif, F., Larkin, J.H., & Brackett, G.C. (1976). Teaching general learning and problem-solving

skills. American Journal of Physics, 44(3), 212-217.

Reif, F., & Scott, L.A. (1999). Teaching scientific thinking skills: Students and computers

coaching each other. American Journal of Physics, 67, 819-831.

Reigosa, C., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2007). Scaffolded problem-solving in the physics and

chemistry laboratory: Difficulties hindering students’ assumption of responsibility.


Reiner, M. (1998). Thought experiments and collaborative learning in physics. International

Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1043-1058.

Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R.K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem

solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational


Resnick, L.B., & Glaser, R. (1976). Problem solving and intelligence. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), The


nature of intelligence (pp. 205-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Robertson, W.C. (1990). Detection of cognitive structure with protocol data: Predicting

performance on physics transfer problems. Cognitive Science, 14, 253-280.

Roth, W.M., & McGinn, M.K. (1997). Toward a new perspective on problem solving. Canadian

Journal of Education, 22(1), 18-32.

Royer, J.M., Cisero, A., & Carlo, M.S. (1993). Techniques and procedures for assessing

cognitive skills. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 201-243.

Sabella, M., & Redish, E. F. (in press). Knowledge activation and organization in physics

problem-solving. American Journal of Physics.

Saunders, K.P., Glatz, C.E., Huba, M.E., Griffin, M.H., Mallapragada, S.K., & Shanks, J.V.

(2003). Using rubrics to facilitate students’ development of problem solving skills.

Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference

& Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, Session 2793.

Savelsbergh, E.R., de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. (1998). Competence-related

differences in problem representations: A study in physics problem solving. In M.W. van

Someren, P. Reimann, H.P.A. Boshuizen, & T. de Jong (Eds.) Learning with multiple

representations (pp. 263-282). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.

Savelsbergh, E.R., de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. (2000). Learning physics with a

computer algebra system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(3), 229-242.

Savelsbergh, E.R., de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. (2002). Situational knowledge in

physics: The case of electrodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10),

928-951.

Savelsbergh, E.R., Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M., & de Jong, T. (1997, August). The importance of


an enhanced problem representation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the

European Conference on Learning and Instruction, Athens, Greece.

Schoenfeld, A.H. (1979). Can heuristics be taught? The elements of a theory and a report on the

teaching of general mathematical problem-solving skills. In J. Lochhead, & J. Clement


Philadelphia: The Franklin Institute Press.

Schoenfeld, A. (1979). Explicit heuristic training as a variable in problem solving performance.

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10, 173-187.

Schoenfeld, A. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Beliefs, social cognitions and

metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive Science, 7, 329-

363.

Schoenfeld, A.H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc.

Schoenfeld, A.H. (1988). Problem solving in context(s). In R.I. Charles & E.A. Silver (Eds.),

The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving vol. 3 (pp. 82-92). Reston,

VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. (& Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates)

Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and

sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on

mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: MacMillan.

Schoenfeld, A.H., & Hermann, D.J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in

expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology:

Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(5), 484-494.

Schultz, K., & Lochhead, J. (1991). A view from physics. In M.U. Smith (Ed.) Toward a unified


theory of problem solving: Views from the content domains (pp. 99-114). Hillsdale, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Shaffer, P.S., & McDermott, L.C. (2005). A research-based approach to improving student

understanding of the vector nature of kinematical concepts. American Journal of Physics,

73(10), 921-931.

Shanteau, J. (1992). Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational

Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 252-266.

Shavelson, R.J. (1973). Learning from physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science

Teaching, 10(2), 101-111.

Shavelson, R.J., Ruiz-Primo, M.A., & Wiley, E.W. (2005). Windows into the mind. Higher

Education, 49, 413-430.

Shavelson, R.J., & Stanton, G.C. (1975). Construct validation: Methodology and application to

three measures of cognitive structure. Journal of Educational Measurements, 12(2), 67-

85.

Sherin, B. (1999, March). Common sense clarified: Intuitive knowledge and its role in physics

expertise. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research

in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.

Sherin, B.L. (2001). How students understand physics equations. Cognition and Instruction,

19(4), 479-541.

Sherwood, B.A. (1983). Pseudo work and real work. American Journal of Physics, 51, 597-602.

Shin, N., Jonassen, D.H., & McGee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured

problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,

40(1), 6-33.

Silver, E.A., & Kilpatrick, J. (1988). Testing mathematical problem solving. In R.I. Charles &


E.A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving vol. 3

(pp. 178-186). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. (&

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates)

Simon, H.A. (1975). The functional equivalence of problem solving skills. Cognitive

Psychology, 7, 268-288.

Simon, H.A. (1976). Identifying basic abilities underlying intelligent performance of complex

tasks. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 65-98). Hillsdale, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Simon, H.A. (1981). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT

Press.

Simon, H.A. (1989). Problem solving and education. In H.A. Simon (Ed.), Models of thought

vol. 2 (pp. 278-288). New Haven: Yale University Press. (Reprinted from Problem

Solving and Education, pp. 81-96, by D. Tuma and F. Reif, Eds., 1980, Hillsdale, NJ:

Erlbaum)

Simon, D.P., & Simon, H.A. (1979). A tale of two protocols. In J. Lochhead & J.S. Clement


Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Press.

Simon, D.P., & Simon, H.A. (1978). Individual differences in solving physics problems, in R.S.

Siegler (Ed.) Children's Thinking: What Develops? (pp. 325-361). Hillsdale, NJ:

Erlbaum.

Singh, C. (2002). When physical intuition fails. American Journal of Physics, 70(11), 1103–

1109.

Slater, T.F. (2005). Save time with a high performance grading system. The Physics Teacher,

43(6), 396-397.


Smith, M.U. (1991). A view from biology. In M.U. Smith (Ed.), Toward a unified theory of

problem solving: Views from the content domains (pp. 1-19). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Snow, R.E. (1989). Toward assessment of cognitive and conative structures in learning.

Educational Researcher, 18(9), 8-14.

Snyder, J.L. (2000). An investigation of the knowledge structure of experts, intermediates, and

novices in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 979-992.

Sorensen, C.M., Churukian, A.D., Maleki, S., & Zollman, D.A. (2006). The New Studio format

for instruction of introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 74(12), 1077-1082.

Stamovlasis, D., & Tsaparlis, G. (2005). Cognitive variables in problem solving: A nonlinear

approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 7-32.

Steiff, M. (2007). Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learning and

Instruction, 17(2), 219-234.

Sternberg, R.J. (1982). A componential approach to intellectual development. In R.J. Sternberg

(Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence vol. 1 (pp. 413-463). Hillsdale,

NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Sternberg, R.J. (1998). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an expert

student? Instructional Science, 26, 127-140.

Sternberg, R.J. (1999). Intelligence as developing expertise. Contemporary Educational

Psychology, 24, 359-375.

Stewart, J., & Hafner, R. (1991). Extending the conception of problem in problem-solving

research. Science Education, 75(1), 105-120.

Sutherland, L. (2002). Developing problem solving expertise: The impact of instruction in a

question analysis strategy. Learning and Instruction, 12, 155-187.


Swanson, H.L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving.

Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 306-314.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive

Science, 12, 257-285.

Taconis, R., Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M., & Broekkamp, H. (2001). Teaching science problem

solving: An overview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,

38(4), 442-468.

Tao, P.K. (2001). Developing understanding through confronting varying views: The case of

solving qualitative physics problems. International Journal of Science Education, 23(12),

1201-1218.

Thacker, B., Kim, E., Trefz, K., & Lea, S. (1994). Comparing problem solving performance of

students in inquiry-based and traditional introductory physics courses. American Journal

of Physics, 62(7), 627-633.

Tsaparlis, G. (1998). Dimensional analysis and predictive models in problem solving.


Tuminaro, J., & Redish, E.F. (2007). Elements of a cognitive model of physics problem solving:

Epistemic games. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 3(2),

020101.

Van Ausdal, R.G. (1988). Structured problem solving in kinematics. The Physics Teacher, ??(?),

518-521.

van Gog, T., Ericsson, K.A., & Paas, F. (2005). Instructional design for advanced learners:

Establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and

deliberate practice. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(3), 73-81.

Van Heuvelen, A. (1991a). Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based


instructional strategies. American Journal of Physics, 59(10), 891-897.

Van Heuvelen, A. (1991b). Overview, case study physics. American Journal of Physics, 59(10),

898-907.

Van Heuvelen, A., & Zou, X. (2001). Multiple representations of work-energy processes.


Van Weeren, J.H.P., de Mul, F.F.M., Peters, M.J., Kramers-Pals, H., & Roossink, H.J. (1982).

Teaching problem-solving in physics: A course in electromagnetism. American Journal

of Physics, 50(8), 725-732.

VanLehn, K.A. (1996a). Cognitive skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 513-39.

VanLehn, K.A. (1996b). Conceptual and meta learning during coached problem solving. In C.

Frasson, G. Gauthier, & A. Lesgold (Eds.), ITS'96: Proceedings the Third International

Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 29-47). New York: Springer-Verlag.

VanLehn, K.A. (1998). Analogy events: How examples are used during problem solving.

Cognitive Science, 22(3), 347-388.

Veldhuis, G.H. (1990). The use of cluster analysis in categorization of physics problems. Science

Education, 74, 105-118.

Vollmeyer, R., Burns, B.D., & Holyoak, K.J. (1996). The impact of goal-specificity on strategy

use and the acquisition of problem structure. Cognitive Science, 20, 75-100.

Voorhees, A.B. (Summer 2001). Creating and implementing competency-based learning models.

New Directions in Institutional Research, 110, 83-95.

Voss, J.F. (1989). Problem solving and the educational process. In A. Lesgold & R. Glaser

(Eds.), Foundations for a psychology of education (pp. 251-294). Hillsdale, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ward, M., & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples. Cognition and



Wenke, D., & Frensch, P.A. (2003). Is success or failure at solving complex problems related to

intellectual ability? In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of

problem solving (pp. 87-126). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wright, D.S., & Williams, C.D. (1986). A WISE strategy for introductory physics. The Physics

Teacher, 24(4), 211-216.

Woods, D.R. (1987a). Problem solving in practice. In D. Gabel (Ed.) What research says to the

science teacher. Vol. 5: Problem solving, (pp. 97-121). Washington, D.C.: National

Science Teachers Association.

Woods, D.R. (1987b). PS corner: Problem solving in physics. Journal of College Science

Teaching, 16(5), 480-484.

Woods, D.R. (1989, Nov.). PS corner: Developing students’ problem-solving skills.

Journal of College Science Teaching, 19(2), 108-110.

Woods, D.R. (1989-90, Dec.-Jan.). PS corner: Developing students’ problem-solving

skills. Journal of College Science Teaching, 19(3), 176-179.

Woods, D.R. (1993, Sept.-Oct.). PS corner: Problem solving – What doesn’t seem to

work. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(1), 57-58.

Woods, D.R. (2000). An evidence-based strategy for problem solving. Journal of Engineering

Education, 89(4), 443-459.

Woods, D.R., Hrymak, A.N., Marshall, R.R., Wood, P.E., Crowe, C.M., Hoffman, T.W., et al.

(1997). Developing problem solving skills: The McMaster problem solving program.

Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 75-91.

Zajchowski, R. & Martin, J. (1993). Differences in the problem solving of stronger and weaker


novices in physics: knowledge, strategies, or knowledge structures? Journal of Research

in Science Teaching, 30(5), 459-470.

Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representation in problem solving. Cognitive Science,

21, 179-217.

Zhang, J., & Norman, D. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive

Science, 18, 87-122.

Research References: Validity & Reliability References...

Documents

Transcript of Research References: Validity & Reliability References...