RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW · PDF fileresearch project overview ii. tennessee’s seamless...

download RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW · PDF fileresearch project overview ii. tennessee’s seamless alignment and integrated learning support (sails) program the statewide context the sails

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW · PDF fileresearch project overview ii. tennessee’s seamless...

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

    RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW The Study of Pre-College Math Remediation Programs in Tennessee

    SUMMARY

    I. BACKGROUND

    The Connection Between College-Level

    Remediation and College Completion

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

    II. TENNESSEES SEAMLESS ALIGNMENT AND

    INTEGRATED LEARNING SUPPORT (SAILS)

    PROGRAM

    The Statewide Context

    The SAILS Program

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

    Figure 1: Traditional Remediation Model vs. SAILS Program Model

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

    How Does the SAILS Program Work?

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

    Initial Results from SAILS Implementation

    III. THE EVALUTION

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

    Measuring Students Short- and Long-Term

    Outcomes

    Student Math Post-Assessment.

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

    State Administrative Data.

    Contextual Information

    Student and Teacher Surveys.

    Site Visits.

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

    Table 1. Timeline of Recruitment, Data Collection, and Dissemination

    Activity Timing

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

    IV. CONCLUSION

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

    REFERENCES

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

  • RESEARCH PROJECT OVERVIEW

    ABOUT THE AUTHORS

    Center for Education Policy Research at Harvard University

    Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University

    MEDIA CONTACT

    This research is made possible through a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

    (ID# OPP1108269) to the President and Fellows of Harvard College. The opinions expressed

    are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Gates Foundation. The authors

    would like to thank Abbie Alexander, Andrea Beesley, Robert Denn, Emily House, Mike Krause,

    Jeanette Tippett, and Nate Schwartz for their feedback and support. The authors also thank

    Marc Johnson for his contributions to an earlier version of the literature review for CEPR.