Research Opportunities in Clinical Microbiology · Research Opportunities in Clinical Microbiology...
Transcript of Research Opportunities in Clinical Microbiology · Research Opportunities in Clinical Microbiology...
Research Opportunities in Clinical Microbiology
Kimberly Hanson, MD, MHS Associate Professor of Medicine and Pathology
Section Head, Clinical Mycology Laboratory Medical Director, Transplant Infectious Diseases
Program Director, Medical Microbiology Fellowship
University of Utah and ARUP Laboratories
Medical Microbiology
Overview • Subspecialty Pathology
– 1 year training program after • Adult or Pediatric ID • Anatomic/Clinical Pathology
– Certification • Direct a laboratory • Enhance ID skills/knowledge • Opportunities for research
– Organism specific – Drug Resistance – Diagnostics – Outcomes research – Epidemiology – And the list goes on……….
ACGME Accredited Programs 1. Beth Israel Deaconess 2. Brigham & Women’s Hospital 3. Cleveland Clinic 4. Duke University 5. Emory University 6. Indiana University 7. John’s Hopkins University 8. Massachusetts General Hospital 9. Mayo Clinic 10. University of Chicago/North Shore 11. University of Iowa 12. University Texas Southwestern 13. University of Utah 14. Yale University
http://www.acgme.org/ads/Public/Programs/Search? Accessed June 2105
Research Focus Development and Validation of New Diagnostic Tests
Early phase test development Later phase test utilization
Invention Utilization
Several examples of recent/ongoing projects - Rapid identification of mold - Inducible macrolide resistance in RGM
Classic Fungal Identification Tests Method Advantages Disadvantages Culture • Isolate for ID and
susceptibility testing • Delayed results • Poor sensitivity • Lacks specificity from non-
sterile sites (colonization vs. infection vs. contamination)
Phenotypic ID • Most common fungi can be identified accurately
• Tease prep is fast and cheap
• Molds require expertise • Biochemical incubation 24-
72hrs • Misidentifications
Histopathology • Gold standard for invasive disease
• Difficult to obtain • Not species-specific • Prone to sampling bias
Nuclear rRNA 18S 5.8S Nuclear rRNA 28S ITS I ITS II
PCR
Sequencing
Fungal Sequence Database
Ribosomal RNA Gene Cluster
Gene Targets for Fungal Identification
Highly conserved Highly conserved
D1/D2 50-100 copies
Haploid genome
Current diagnostic standard for ID is expensive and technically complex
Approximately 2% of yeast go unidentified with combo phenotypic and genotypic testing Slechta ES, Hohmann SL, Simmon K, Hanson KE. Med Mycol. 2012 50(5):458-66
Complexities associated with Mold Identification Paecilomyces spp. are morphologically similar, but phyolgenetically diverse
2. Barker AP, Horan JL, Slechta ES, Alexander BD, and Hanson KE. Med Mycol 2013 ;52(5):53 1. JCM 2010; 48(8): 2754
Morphology Clinical Isolates (n=77) • Phenotypic ID
– P. lilacinus (n= 52) – P. variotii (n=21) – Paecilomyces spp. (n=4)
• Multi-locus sequencing (MLS) – ITS 1/2, D1/D2, β-tubulin – P. variotti phenotype or Paecilomyces spp.
• P. variotii sensu stricto (n=12) • P. formosus (n=3) • Paecilomyces dactylethromorphus (n=3) • Rasamsonia argillacea (n=4) • Rasamsonia piperina (n=1) • Hamigera spp. (n=1)
Required MLS
Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI) Time-of-Flight (TOF) Mass Spectrometry (MS)
Organism Score
C. glabrata 2.1
C. albicans 1.8
1.) Pure Colony 2.) Protein Extraction a. Colonies mixed with 70% ETOH b. Centrifuge 20,800g x 2min c. Decant and dry pellet d. 70% formic acid and vortex e. Acetonitrile and vortex f. Centrifuge 20,800g x 2min g. 1μL supernatant onto target; dry h. 2 μL matrix; dry
5.) Interpretation • ≥ 2.0 and Δ10% species • 1.7-1.9 genus • < 1.7 no ID
3.)
4.) Spectra
Complexities associated with Mold Identification Is MALDI-TOF MS an easier and equally accurate option?
peak intensities represented in arbitrary units m/z = mass over charge ratio
MALDI-TOF MS Type Strain Spectra Principal Component Analysis-based Clustering
A. Purpureocillium lilacinum B. Paecilomyces dactylethromorphus C. Paecilomyces species D. Hamigera species E. Rasamsonia argillacea/piperina F. Paecilomyces variotii G. Paecilomyces formosus H. *could not be identified using the supplemented MALDI-TOF MS database.
Spectra derived from the Clinical Study Isolates
Barker AP, Horan JL, Slechta ES, Alexander BD, and Hanson KE. Med Mycol 2013 ;52(5):53
93.5% (72/77) agreement between the molecular and proteomic methods only after supplementation of the MALDI-TOF MS database with type strains
MALDI-TOF MS for Molds • Preliminary Data
– Custom spectral database: 162 MSPs, 41 genera, 61 species – Optimized extraction: glass beads with brief vortex – Prospective evaluation of 149 clinical isolates
ID Method Number of IDs Median Time to ID Comment
Phenotypic 105/149 (70%) 5 days Genus or complex-level ID only
Genotypic 34/44 (77%) 7 days Only performed when no phenotypic ID
MALDI 94/149 (63%)
2 days Single attempt with automatic fire 11 with no peaks
Slechta ES, Barker A, Powers-Fletcher M and Hanson KE. ASM Abstract; New Orleans, LA 2015
Phenotype and Maldi
Agree 74%
No MALDI ID
23%
No MALDI Peaks
3%
Phenotypic IDs N=105 No Phenotypic
ID and No MALDI ID
74%
MALDI ID 26%
No Phenotypic ID N=44
All black molds Not well represented in database
Mostly basidiomycetes
Non-sporulating or dermatophytes
Pan-fungal PCR Approaches • A “broad-range” of fungi can cause invasive disease
• Applied directly to clinical specimens or cultured isolates
– Tissue is of particular interest because specimens for culture are not always sent or remain negative even when hyphal elements are seen histopathologically
• A variety of amplicon identification methods exit:
– Examples: DNA sequencing, PCR-electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy, microarray
Hyaline Mold Histopathology (40x) Scedosporium Fusarium Scopulariopsis
Of 122 Non-pigmented (hyaline) septated hyphae with acute angle branching, 83% were confirmed Aspergillus spp. (Lee et al. Med Mycol; 2010: 48: 886)
Antifungal Activity Profile of Various Agents
Organism
Antifungal Drug Amphotericin
Voriconazole
Posaconazole
Echinocandins
Fusarium - ± ± - Scedosporium
apiospermum - + + ±
prolificans - - - - Paecilomyces lilacinus - + + - variottii + - + + Scopulariopsis - ± ± - Mucorales + - ± -
Assay variables affecting analytical sensitivity Primer Design
• 50 rRNA operon sequences – 27 broad-range primers
• Amplicons selected for length and human DNA amplification
• 11 amplicons screened for analytic sensitivity
– 30 fg DNA – 26 fungi in 14 genera
• 2 primer pairs selected – ITS2 (5.8S-1R) detected all fungi – 28S (10F-12R) strongest bands
Tissue Extraction Method
Specimen Extraction Median Cts
Spiked tissue • 3 molds • 3 yeasts • 3 replicates
Chemagic Failed
Chemagic + Beads Failed
Maxwell 20
Maxwell + Beads 20.8
MoBio+ Beads 20.8
Zymo + Beads 20.2
Tissue only • 3 replicates
Chemagic Failed
Chemagic + Beads Failed
Maxwell 37.1
Maxwell + Beads 36.5
MoBio + Beads 42.0
Zymo + Beads 34.8 Khot et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;75:1559
Fungal DNA Contamination • Phlebotomy tubes1
– 18% had Aspergillus spp. DNA
• Reagents2 – Zymolase, lyticase, proteinase K
1.) Harrison et al. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2010; 67: 392-394; 2.) Loeffler et al. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37: 1200-1202;
30
35
40
45
0 2 4 6 8
Number of no template controls
Commercial “Fungal” Master Mix with Broad-range PCR
PCR
Ct
18S Primers 28S Primers ITS-2 Primers
30
35
40
45
0 5 10 1530
35
40
45
0 5 10 15 20
Graphs courtesy P. Khot PhD
• Mitigation Strategies Filter UV Light Environmental cleaning New blades Duplicate testing
Rapid Detection of Macrolide Resistance
M. abscessus group erm(41) gene
• Mycobacterium chelonae-abscessus complex – Acquired and inducible resistance mechanisms
• 23S rRNA peptidyltransferase gene (rrl) – Detected by standard 3 day susceptibility testing
• Erythromycin ribosomal methylase gene (erm) – Detected by extended incubation in clarithromycin (CLSI 2010)
» M. chelonae clarithromycin susceptible » M. abscessus group erm41
• M. abscessus subp abscessus (C to T position 28 (T28) resistant; C28 susceptible) • M. abscessus subp bolletti (T28) • M. abscessus subp. massiliense (247 bp deletion susceptible)
3 days 5 days 7 days 12 days 14 daysM. chelonae % (n=427) 100 100 100 100 99.8M. abscessus group % (n=1025) 97.3 90 63.1 48.6 37.9
0
20
40
60
80
100
% Is
olat
es S
usce
ptib
le
One M. chelonae and 3 M. abscessus group isolates had intermediate clarithromycin susceptibility (MIC 4 µg/ml) detected at day 14 on repeated testing. These organisms are classified as non-susceptible in the figure.
14 day clarithromycin susceptibility test results for all isolates over a 2 year period
Hanson KE, Slechta ES, Muir H, Barker AP.J Clin Microbiol. 2014 May;52(5):1705-7.
ITS Identification
14 Day Clarithromycin Susceptibility*
No. (%)
erm41 genotype
Susceptible
MIC ≤ 2 µg/ml
Intermediate
MIC 4 µg/ml
Resistant No.
MIC ≥ 8 µg/ml
M. Chelonae (n=45) 44 (97.8) 1 (2.2) 0 Not present
M. abscessus group (n= 285) 74 (26) 2 (0.7) 0 C28 sequevar
0 94 (33.0) T28 sequevar
114 (40) 1 (0.3) 0 Deletions
Correlation between erm(41) genotype and macrolide susceptibility
• All sequenced isolates were clarithromycin susceptible after 72 hours incubation in an attempt to eliminate organisms with acquired macrolide resistance due to rrl mutation.
Hanson KE, Slechta ES, Muir H, Barker AP. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 May;52(5):1705-7
So what came out of this? - multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of rrl and erm 41 - recommendations for CLSI - f/u work with Tyler Texas – absence of inducible resistance in M. mucogenicum and M. immunogenum -
Brown-Elliott BA, Hanson KE et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Mar;53(3):875-8
The Mycology R&D Team Medical technicians, Microbiology and ID fellows, Research Scientists, Junior Faculty
• Sue Slechta, PhD • Maggie Powers, PhD • Prasanna Khot, PhD • Erin Graff, PhD • Keith Simmon, PhD • Tatum Lunt, MS • Adam Barker, PhD
Work – Life Balance
University of Utah view from Dr. Sankar Swaminathan’s office