Research Implementation Management Disciplinary impact Research Research-implementation gap Knight...
-
Upload
keaton-mutch -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Research Implementation Management Disciplinary impact Research Research-implementation gap Knight...
Research
Implementation
Management
Disciplinary impact
Research
Research-implementation gap
Knight et al (in prep)
Conservation assessments in the primaryliterature: 1998-2002 (n = 65)
6% implementation on-the-ground23% implemetation in theory71% no mention of implementation
Operational Model for Conservation Planning
Strategy
Mainstream
ingSocial
Assessment
BiophysicalAssessment
Opportunitiesand
Constraints
LearningOrganization
AdaptiveManagement
Implementation
LocalRegional
Spatial Scale
Informed
Involved
Empowered
Sta
ke
ho
lde
r c
oll
ab
ora
tio
n
Assessment Planning Management
Project Phase
Representation
(Conservation Value)
Retention(Vulnerability)
Persistence
(Resilience)
Co
ns
erv
atio
n g
oa
l
N
100 0 100 200 Kilometers
Type 1 protected areas
Types: 100% targetForestsWetlands
Site Irreplaceability1 (Totally Irreplaceable)>0.8 - <1>0.6 - 0.8>0.4 - 0.6>0.2 - 0.4 >0 - 0.2IRREPL = 0
N
100 0 100 200 Kilometers
CAD/NETCadsFishnetPROCESS COMPONENTPro_biomePro_riverPro_sandPROTECTED AREAType 1Type 2Type 3INITIAL EXCLUDEDIE
Thicket biome
Dune
Primary water catchments
Core (1st stage)Expansion (2nd stage)
Megaconservancy networks
Gouritz - Little Karoo
Gamtoos - Groot
Sundays - Camdeboo
Fish - Kowie
Gqunube - Amatole
Kei
0 50 100 Kilometers
Rouget, Cowling et al (2006) Cons Biol 20, 408-419.
Operational Model for Conservation Planning
Strategy
Mainstream
ingSocial
Assessment
BiophysicalAssessment
Opportunitiesand
Constraints
LearningOrganization
AdaptiveManagement
Implementation
LocalRegional
Spatial Scale
Informed
Involved
Empowered
Sta
ke
ho
lde
r c
oll
ab
ora
tio
n
Assessment Planning Management
Project Phase
Representation
(Conservation Value)
Retention(Vulnerability)
Persistence
(Resilience)
Co
ns
erv
atio
n g
oa
l
Defining and doing mainstreaming
…involves the integration of biodiversity values and goals…into economic sectors
Spread the burden and benefits…form partnerships…devise ’win-win’ scenarios
Change behaviour by creating institutions thatbind actors
Interventions may happen at all scales of organization and geography – employ the ‘nutcracker’ approach
Easier to achieve in some situations than others
Defining outcomes needs attention
Elements associated with three components of a mainstreaming framework
Prerequisites Stimuli Mechanisms
Democratic and accountable governance
Awareness and knowledge
Organizational and institutional capacity
Improved governance
Resource decline
Socio-economic incentives
Effective communication
Strengthening organizational and institutional capacity
Enabling legislation and policy
Constraints
Behaviour: awareness, knowledge and pro-natureValues doesn’t lead to behaviour change
Poor governance
Weak capacity of organizations and institutions
Lack of scientific know how
Dwindling awareness