Research for EEAA Council

32
Research for EEAA Council October 2011 1

description

Research for EEAA Council. October 2011. Purpose. To understand; The process of change in TE in Europe How colleges are thinking about the future What EEAA network services should be doing. Method. Non-directive questionnaires 21 open ended questions Representative circulation. Response. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Research for EEAA Council

Page 1: Research for EEAA Council

1

Research for EEAA CouncilOctober 2011

Page 2: Research for EEAA Council

2

PurposeTo understand;1. The process of change in TE in

Europe2. How colleges are thinking about

the future3. What EEAA network services

should be doing

Page 3: Research for EEAA Council

3

Method1.Non-directive

questionnaires2.21 open ended questions3.Representative circulation

Page 4: Research for EEAA Council

4

Response1. From twelve colleges2. From 12 countries3. From a full spectrum of different academic

levels4. From a variety of levels of experience,

although most were very experienced5. Most responses were individual, some were

collaborative, two questionnaires were received relating to one college.

Page 5: Research for EEAA Council

5

Question A 1 - In what ways has TE changed since you were a student?

1. Academic level risen2. Social Science and practical ministry emphasis3. Variety of delivery systems4. Less community or residence5. Teaching more student oriented6. Other issues mentioned included less daily

devotions, less rules and less narrow-mindedness

Page 6: Research for EEAA Council

6

Question A2 How are students different today from then?

1. They bring contemporary culture into the college

2. Demographic change3. More pastoral care and mentoring needed4. Other issues – less biblical knowledge,

more interest in social issues and more concern for certificates and degrees.

Page 7: Research for EEAA Council

7

Question A3 How has the role of the teacher changed?

1. Becoming a facilitator of student learning

2. Therefore the teacher should be approachable, humble, transparent, a model, helping students to think for themselves

3. Other issues mentioned included – it was always the case that the teacher was more important than the content of the teaching, and that teachers were now expected to fulfil pastoral as well as academic duties.

Page 8: Research for EEAA Council

8

Question A 4 Has the relationship between teacher and student changed in nature and practice? How?1. The closing “power gap” between

lecturer and student2. Therefore modelling learning, life and

integration is key3. Other issues mentioned – still too much

of the “lecture and leave” pattern around and that TE had been more ionfluenced by HE of late.

Page 9: Research for EEAA Council

9

Question A 5 The role of the teacher is often seen in tension between being a scholar and a minister; do you agree with this and, if so, how has it changed?1. General agreement there is this

tension, some said the academic too strong a factor, others said pendulum is swinging back

2. All said pastoral care should be provided by the teacher

3. Some mentioned that the heavy admin burden makes this very difficult

Page 10: Research for EEAA Council

10

Question A 6 TE is often described as having three formation objectives for students; academic, practical ministry and spiritual. Has the balance and relationship between these changed? Is this taxonomy out of date?

1. All agreed it was stil;l valuable but a few thought it was so ubiquitous it needed qualification.

2. Most talked of integration needed between the three

3. Some said the academic had distorted the balance and a re-balancing was needed

Page 11: Research for EEAA Council

11

Question A 7 Accreditation for schools, government and otherwise, has become a larger issue. What are your views on this?

1. Almost all agreed that it can be beneficial

2. Most warned that it can not be allowed to damage college mission or values

3. Various advantages were listed

Page 12: Research for EEAA Council

12

Question D1 How do you think your college/theological education provision will change in the next ten years?1. More flexible provision2. This will be in response to financial pressure and

student demand3. Larger variety of courses, especially at masters level4. A few mentioned that we may see a comeback of

spiritual provision running separate from academic validation

Page 13: Research for EEAA Council

13

Question D2 How do you think theological education will change in your country in the next ten years?

1. Finance will be difficult, schools will close or merge, church training schemes will grow2. Gap between gov. accredited schools and ministry training non-accredited schools will grow3. Other issues mentioned – eroding of community, greater social engagement, more reflective practice structure

Page 14: Research for EEAA Council

14

Question D3 How will students be different from today, in ten years’ time?

1. Some questioned whether there would be a significant difference

2. Gap between young students and older faculty will increase, especially over technology

3. Students will be more consumers and more in charge of their learning – yet they may be more insecure

4. Others mentioned were – they will have even less biblical knowledge and they will expect even more flexibility in delivery

Page 15: Research for EEAA Council

15

Question D4 How do you expect theological education to change in the next ten years because of finance issues/problems?1. Small schools will be in danger of closing and larger

schools will tend to survive as more consumer attitudes by students lead top greater competition

2. Finance will also accelerate the move towards more flexible delivery and away from traditional schooling

3. Other isssues mentioned were the need to educate the churches as to the value of TE and that we need to work together and share resources more

Page 16: Research for EEAA Council

16

Question D 5 People in Europe today (unlike the past) have a number of different jobs and careers in their lifetimes. Does this affect what we do?1. General agreement that this is an issue2. One common response to this was that we need to be

more welcoming to older students3. Another common response was that we should

concentrate more on lifelong learning4. Another was that we should emphasise general

theology and bible subjects and reverse the trend to specific ministry degrees in the 90s

Page 17: Research for EEAA Council

17

Question D 6 It has been suggested that nowadays, people come to college for different reasons than some years ago. Do you agree and how does this project into the future?1. About half disagreed and said that students were

there for similar reasons and with similar commitment. Students have always also come for non-ministry reasons such as spiritual growth

2. About half agreed and generally mentioned that students tend more nowadays to come to “sort themselves out” academically or spiritually and have less idea of where they are going

Page 18: Research for EEAA Council

18

Question D 7 There has recently been a shift away from residential training. Will this continue and what do you think about it?1. Most agreed that this will continue and may intensify for financial reasons2. It was often expressed that this was a loss because TE was relational and community based3. Two thought that the good in this trend was that it gave access to a wider variety of students4. Some thought that there would be a swing back to college community based training because it is so attractive to contemporary society

Page 19: Research for EEAA Council

19

Question D 8 What are the things we must do as theological schools in view of the possible future?

A complete variety of responses with almost no overlap between the responders

Page 20: Research for EEAA Council

20

Question D 9 What will be the characteristics of effective theological teachers in the next ten years?

1. Greatest response was in the area of relationship with students – love, care for, respect, guide, be a paraclete, inspire, be a model2. After that was the spiritual life and reality of the teacher3. Some mentioned that teachers will have to increasingly know their subject4. A few saw that teaching well was vital5. Other issues mentioned were – that they should be chhurch people, willing to learn, and be younger!

Page 21: Research for EEAA Council

21

Section E Is there anything else you would like to say about theological education in Europe not covered by the questions above ?Vey little was added, some mentioning that after so many questions, there was little more to sayOne attached a very useful essay on TE today, another said we need hope and joy ultimately in God and what we are doing. Another mentioned the need for a missional perspective. A few mentioned again the issue of th disolving of strong community under financial pressures

Page 22: Research for EEAA Council

22

Major FindingsPresent

1.Academic excellence

2.Social understanding and competence

Page 23: Research for EEAA Council

23

Major FindingsFuture

1.Delivery Systems

2.Staff/student relationship

Page 24: Research for EEAA Council

24

Question B.1 “What are the best things the network could do for the leaders of colleges?”

1. Bring leaders together for networking, encouragement

2. Ongoing leadership education3. Discussion about key issues in

Europe and the church

Page 25: Research for EEAA Council

25

Question B.2 – Teachers “What are the best things the network could do for teachers in their regular work?”

1. Resources and teaching on the job of teaching in TE2. Other ideas mentioned – encouragement, teaching education, practical ideas that work3. The heavy workload was noted

Page 26: Research for EEAA Council

26

Question B.3 “What are your views about EEAA services and helps being restricted to those who are members rather than available to all theological educators in Europe?”

1. All agreed there should be some special benefit for members only

2. These were variously described as Financial benefits, restriction of services to members and priority given to members

Page 27: Research for EEAA Council

27

Question B.4 “What is the value of your college being in membership of (as opposed to accredited by) EEAA?”

1.Networking2.Resources3.College profile

Page 28: Research for EEAA Council

28

Question B.5 – “What is EEAA doing right and what is EEAA doing wrong in supporting best thinking and practice in TE in Europe ?”

1. The Theological Educator, Training courses and the GA are good practice for EEAA

2. Be encouraged !3. Be warned – Understand diversity

across Europe and don’t try to duplicate what is already being done

Page 29: Research for EEAA Council

29

What you would like to see

book

disc

ounts

Acce

ss to

on lin

e jou

rnals

votin

g righ

ts

GA and

confe

renc

es

Discus

sion b

ulleti

n boa

rds

Discou

nts on

cour

se fe

es

membe

rs ne

wslette

r

Semina

r/retr

eat f

or le

ader

s

subje

ct se

minars

semina

rs in

other

area

s

expe

rt he

lp fac

ility

membe

rs on

ly se

ction

help

to pu

blish

scho

ols ac

comod

ation

facult

y sha

ring/e

xcha

nge

Stud

ent e

xcha

nge

note

shar

ing fa

cility

facult

y app

ointm

ents

notic

e of s

pecia

l cou

rses

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

score

score

Page 30: Research for EEAA Council

30

The four most popular1.GA conferences2.Seminar/retreats for

principals/leaders3.Discounts on course fees4.Access to on line journals

Page 31: Research for EEAA Council

31

The three next most popular

4. Book discounts5. Voting rights6. Expert help to call on

Page 32: Research for EEAA Council

32

Major FindingsEEAA Network Provision

1.Encouragement2.Member benefits3.Principal

retreats/seminars4.Books, journals and

expert help