Research Data Management and the Library & Information Science professions Andrew...
Transcript of Research Data Management and the Library & Information Science professions Andrew...
Research Data Management and the Library & Information Science professions
Andrew Cox
JS Gericke Library, Stellenbosch, 2 November 2016
CONTEXT
Context
• RDM is about creating, finding, organising, storing, sharing and preserving research data within any research process
• Drivers for RDM – Data deluge – Compliance with funder requirements – Crisis of reproducibility – Compliance with journal requirements – Open Science – Good research practice
Good research practice
Open access
Desire to keep control o their data
Work involved in processing datasets
Lack of RDM knowledge & skills
Legal, ethical & commercial exceptions
Good Research Data Management
practices
Academic culture & lack of reuse culture
Force field analysis of RDM
Nov-16
Data preservation
Data storage & security
Compliance
The strengths of these forces play out differently in different contexts
Open Science
Reproducilbiity
Good research practice
Open access
Desire to keep control o their data
Work involved in processing datasets
Lack of RDM knowledge & skills
Legal, ethical & commercial exceptions
Good Research Data Management
practices
Academic culture & lack of reuse culture
Activity: How would you redraw this for your context?
Nov-16
Data preservation
Data storage & security
Compliance
Open Science
Reproducilbiity
Challenges
• Multiple drivers, including compliance element
• Scale of the problem, as a culture change issue
• Researchers’ own communities and loyalties extend beyond the institution
• Character of data itself – Volume, variety, velocity
– Not a thing: “when is data?”
– Fragility
• Alternative priorities
SOME THEORY OF PROFESSIONAL WORK
The professions and their decline
• Professions are one way of organising knowledge; “knowledge based occupations” (MacDonald, 1995) – prototypes medicine, law – Specialist knowledge – Accreditation – Autonomy and ethics – Values and an occupational culture – Social networks, particularly useful when problems are “complex, ambiguous and poorly
understood” (Swan and Newell, 1995) – “A central life interest” (Freidson, 1994)
• Librarianship as a “semi-profession”
• During the C20th under attack from the state, educated publics, the organisation and technology • State controls, eg clinical guidelines • Scepticism about professional knowledge E.g. The knowledgeable/expert patient • The organisation, eg discourse about business need, vs “silos” • Technology, eg google and the library
• Professionalisation has been seen as a strategy of “social closure”
Abbott’s (1988) System of professions
• Professions competing with each other for “jurisdiction” in the public domain, in law and in the workplace – Abstract knowledge, with ability to diagnose and solve
problems
– Dynamic picture based on continuous competition
– Eg LIS Access/ IL jurisdiction
– Competition and collaboration?
Differing and shared values of two professions (Creth, 1994)
• Computing professional – Technical orientation
– Entrepreneurial behaviour
– Creativity encouraged
• Librarian – Service orientation
– Consensus approach
– Fiscal responsibility
• Professional orientation
• Focus on global information community
• Concerned with well being of university
Cultural attributes of computing and libraries (Favini, 1997)
• “Computing services – Technology is the main driver of services
offered – Change in organizational structure is frequent – Use of formal project management
techniques is common – Male dominated environment – ACS under a Vice President of IT with an
emphasis on supporting Administration, Staff and Faculty
– Salaries vary greatly throughout the industry – Staff turn-over relatively high – Team oriented focus to accomplish clearly
defines goals – Reward system is flexible, based on short-
term performance – People possessing technical expertise operate
"behind the scenes" – Pace of change is fast ”
• “Libraries – Emphasis on contact with people – Technology used primarily to accomplish
service goals – Roles of organization members well defined
and agreed upon – The major functions of library work do not
vary among institutions – Librarians are products of a shared
educational experience, MLS – Staff turn-over relatively low – Female dominated profession – Organizational power derived by formal job
title – Reward system is comparable across the
industry – The acquisition of technology driven by
suppliers of information services rather than home grown innovation
– Library traditionally under the Academic Provost with an emphasis on supporting Students and Faculty”
Nov-16
FRAGMENTATION, FUSION, HYBRIDITY, THIRD SPACE, MULTIPLE & FLUID IDENTITIES
Fragmentation
• Public libraries… academic libraries… workplace libraries… law libraries
• The cataloguer… the systems person… customer service… liaison
• Proliferating specialties?
Government Knowledge and Information Management Profession- GKIM
11/11/2016 14
McFarlane (2013)
Cit
ed in
Osw
ald
an
d S
trat
hm
ann
(2
01
2)
Third Space (Whitchurch 2012)
• Neither academic or purely support roles • Bounded, cross-boundary, unbounded and blended
professionals • “Broadly based, extended projects across the university,
which are no longer containable within firm boundaries, and have created new portfolios of activity” (Whitchurch 2012: 24)
• Exciting, demanding, creative • Vulnerable to change, lack of cohesive group and identity
Multiple identities
• Communities of practice perspective
– Communities are actively shaped by our participation
– Multi-membership
– Trajectories of membership
– Boundary spanning
Summary: Our theoretical toolkit
• The profession as one way of organising knowledge
• Competition and collaboration
• Fragmentation
• Fusion; Hybridity; Third space roles
• Multi-membership and fluidity in professional identity
Activity: Employing our theoretical toolkit
• The profession as one way of organising knowledge
• Competition and collaboration
• Fragmentation • Fusion • Hybridity; Third space
roles • Multi-membership and
fluidity in professional identity
• Can you think of examples of these phenomena around you or occurring in your own experience?
• Which seem to resonate with your experience of RDM, in particular?
RESEARCH DATA MANAGEMENT
Emerging roles in UK libraries
• Digital curation/preservation specialist • Research data management coordinator
– RDM focus, with culture change remit, user requirements gathering, user advice and education
• Research Data Metadata specialist • Repository Manager • Research support librarian
– A general role encompassing: liaison, open access, RDM, data curation, bibliometrics, publishing
• Embedded librarian
Liz Lyon @ Pittsburgh:
The institutional Research Data Service • An institutional policy and business plan
• Support for Data Management Planning
• A guidance web site and advisory services
– On identifying secondary data
– On anonymising data
– On managing sensitive data
– …ETC
• A programme of training
– For PhD and taught students and for staff at different levels
– Relating to data carpentry, data analysis, data sharing…ETC
• Provision for secure and shared of active research data
• A catalogue or repository of research data
– Decisions about what should be collected
– High quality metadata
– Visible within wider collections
– …ETC
• Long term curation of data
• Embedded support within projects
• Leadership on RDM at an institutional level
– Change management
• Researchers themselves
• Senior research managers
• Librarians
• IT staff (central and distributed)
• Research Office (central and distributed)
• Archives and records managers
• Legal department
• …ETC
Taking on RDM roles in the library – theoretical possibilities
• Train Researcher/ research team • Recruit an expert data curator/ change manager / project
manager/ infrastructure expert/ librarian to be embedded in a project
• Upskill staff, from library, IT, records management, research administration – In library might be in research support team – Might be across all teams – IT and research admin staff are often embedded in departments
• Collaborate/ shared service • Out-source services • Substitute expertise with technology
Activity: “Who does what?” game
• “Others” could include – Archives and records managers
– Legal office: involvement in policy development
– Training/staff development: training
– Research ethics coordinators
– Distributed professional services: Faculty or departmental based IT or research support
• Of course it is an option not to do some things at all!
Libraries IT
Research administration
Researcher/research student
Information literacy
Data security
Slide by Martin Lewis, Director of Library, University of Sheffield
WHAT ARE LIS PROFESSIONALS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES FOR RESPONDING TO RDM?
LIS is resilient because…
• The generic value of its knowledge base (e.g. principles of information organisation ) – existing jurisdiction of access and IL
• Continuing relevance of professional values e.g. commitment to access to information for all (as open access)
• Strong professional organisation? Not in the UK, at least at level of profession of librarianship as a whole
• Large professional group • Strong culture • Strong intra-institutional networks • Responsive, service orientation • Commitment to learning new skills
• Defensive – driven by attack on core jurisdiction • Do we ask enough questions about compliance agendas?
Challenges • We are already over-taxed!
– Other challenges in supporting research (Auckland, 2012)
– Getting up-to-speed and keeping up-to-date
• How deep is our understanding of research, especially scientific research and our level of subject knowledge?
• Complexity and scale of issues – Marked disciplinary differences in information practice
– Goes wide and deep: to every researcher in our institutions
• Translating library practices to research data issues
• Will researchers look to libraries for this support? Historic failure to engage researchers in library services – Computing services, Research support services
• Resources, infrastructure, management structures have to be found
WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF NEW TYPES OF CHALLENGE LIKE RDM FOR THE LIS CURRICULUM?
Implications for LIS curriculum
• Competencies/mindset to support RDM
• Information fundamentals such as metadata, information organisation – Preservation/stewardship
• Information values: access, standards, openness
• Knowledge of IT systems
• Understanding of research practice
• Competencies to exploit possibilities in fluid professional environment
• Flexibility and creativity • Strategic vision • Horizon scanning and
computational “intelligence” • Influencing skills • Networking
• How should we teach these
things?
YOUR REFLECTIONS AND QUESTIONS