Research and discussion paper

7
islandschool Year 8 Island Time Truth and Lies Research and Discussion Paper Overview The aim is for you to collaborate in groups to analyse a contentious question. You are to research arguments for and against the question and to present a paper about the research. The paper will present the question, the arguments for and against and reach a conclusion. The skills Critical thinking as part of Capacity to Learn. Organisation Your teacher will divide the class into groups of four. As a group you will research together and inform each other on your ideas- but the actual writing responsibility will be divided up so that one person is the main writer for one section. In addition each student will take an overall role. For example one person will take responsibility for the introduction and will also be the Editor in chief. Sections 1. Introduction on the History and Context of the problem. Why is it important and why is it relevant? 2. Arguments in favour. What arguments have been put forward in favour of the proposition? You should quote from a variety of sources and try to find arguments and evidence that support each other and the statement. Referencing of sources is important. 3. Arguments against- the same as above. 4. Conclusion. A summing up of which evidence is the stronger and why. You should try to say how confident you are of your conclusion, and criticise some of the data that you have found. Try to suggest what the consequences of the conclusion should be and what further research might be done to make the conclusion more certain. Other roles 1. Editor in chief- This person looks at the overall flow of the documents and suggests how sections might be improved in order to create a better complete document. 2. Data editor- This person will look at the accuracy of the statements and of the referencing. They will check that all the references are correct and can be followed, and that they have been reported correctly.

Transcript of Research and discussion paper

Page 1: Research and discussion paper

islandschool

Year 8 Island Time Truth and Lies Research and Discussion Paper

Overview

The aim is for you to collaborate in groups to analyse a contentious question. You are to research arguments for and against the question and to present a paper about the research. The paper will present the question, the arguments for and against and reach a conclusion.

The skills

Critical thinking as part of Capacity to Learn.

Organisation

Your teacher will divide the class into groups of four. As a group you will research together and inform each other on your ideas- but the actual writing responsibility will be divided up so that one person is the main writer for one section. In addition each student will take an overall role. For example one person will take responsibility for the introduction and will also be the Editor in chief.

Sections

1. Introduction on the History and Context of the problem. Why is it important and why is it relevant? 2. Arguments in favour. What arguments have been put forward in favour of the proposition? You should quote from a variety of sources and try to find arguments and evidence that support each other and the statement. Referencing of sources is important. 3. Arguments against- the same as above. 4. Conclusion. A summing up of which evidence is the stronger and why. You should try to say how confident you are of your conclusion, and criticise some of the data that you have found. Try to suggest what the consequences of the conclusion should be and what further research might be done to make the conclusion more certain.

Other roles

1. Editor in chief- This person looks at the overall flow of the documents and suggests how sections might be improved in order to create a better complete document. 2. Data editor- This person will look at the accuracy of the statements and of the referencing. They will check that all the references are correct and can be followed, and that they have been reported correctly. 3. Graphical editor- This person will supply suitable graphics to illustrate the document or edit the layout of graphics that have been supplied by individual contributors. They are responsible for the layout of the paper. 4. Summarising editor- This person will write a short summary or abstract of the report, giving brief descriptions of each of the four sections within an agreed word limit.

Steps in the role

1. Brainstorming- Do you understand the question? What are your initial feelings about the statement? What sort of evidence is your group going to look for? 2. Research- Find all the data required. 3. Sharing- Compare the data found by colleagues. Research, share, research, share, research and share

Page 2: Research and discussion paper

4. Writing- Put your section together with your data. Note that the person writing the conclusion may need to continually go back to those writing For and Against in order to come to a conclusion.5. Editing- Each person performs his or her editing role. Again, this part may require some re-writing 6. Presentation (optional). Each group gives a short talk to the class on their question and their findings

Some possible contentious statements

1. Gun control leads to a safer society. 2. A vegetarian diet is healthier. 3. Homeopathic cures help people recover from illness. 4. Websites should be monitored so that lies and disinformation are removed. 5. Video games lead to violent behaviour.

Guide Sheet for Writing the Introduction Name

Contentious statement

What are the Key words and phrases in the statement? Write down what they mean. Try to get different

definitions and compare them. Make sure you fully understand the terms used.

2

Page 3: Research and discussion paper

Does this question have a history? When did it start becoming important? Have particular events or

changes made the question more or less important these days?

Is the question particularly important in a particular place or part of the world? Are there places where it is

not particularly relevant and others where it is really contentious?

Why is it important? What hangs on the resolution of this question?

What would happen if we could all clearly agree it was true?

What would happen if we could all agree it was false?

Are there dangers to people believing the wrong truth about this statement?

Now try to put together your introduction with as much detail as possible. Make the points in separate

paragraphs, and try to get them to flow together.

Your introduction should have a title and a list of the research team that has worked on this project. The

title should have the contentious statement and a sub title saying that this is an investigation into the

evidence for and against the truth of this statement.

Guide Sheet for Writing the Arguments in Favour Name

Contentious statement

Your role is to search for as many arguments as you can find that support the statement. Try to find

different sources that will support it. The best sources will have some evidence to help their argument.

Evidence can be in the form of case studies or statistics. Try to get a combination of both.

It is very important to realise that you, personally, do not necessarily have to believe the statement true.

Even if you disagree, your role is to find the evidence in favour and be convincing about it.

A case study is a story about an individual case that shows this statement is true in this case. It might be

personal, in that the person writing may be talking about their own experience, or it might be about

another person or group of people. Case studies can be very powerful in appealing to emotion.

3

Page 4: Research and discussion paper

Statistical evidence will take a bigger picture and give numbers. This may compare different groups of

people, or the same group at different times. This kind of evidence can be very powerful in appealing to

reason.

For each source that you have chosen you should do the following things:

1. Summarise the argument they make in your own words.

2. Quote any evidence they give, whether it is statistical or case studies.

3. Make sure that you credit the source of the information by giving a book reference or a web address.

This can be done by using footnotes in your article.

At the end, sum up the strongest parts of the argument in favour of the statement. Try to make your

argument flow together, so it is easy to read. You are aiming to write a piece that is strongly in favour of

your statement, and is convincing to the reader that the statement is true. This will be a combination of

your own ideas and the evidence you have found.

Guide Sheet for Writing the Arguments against Name

Contentious statement

Your role is to search for as many arguments as you can find that show the statement to be false. Try to

find different sources that will attack it. The best sources will have some evidence to help their argument.

Evidence can be in the form of case studies or statistics. Try to get a combination of both.

It is very important to realise that you, personally, do not necessarily have to believe the statement false.

Even if you agree with it, your role is to find the evidence against and be convincing about it.

A case study is a story about an individual case that shows this statement is false in this case. It might be

personal, in that the person writing may be talking about their own experience, or it might be about

another person or group of people. Case studies can be very powerful in appealing to emotion.

Statistical evidence will take a bigger picture and give numbers. This may compare different groups of

people, or the same group at different times. This kind of evidence can be very powerful in appealing to

reason.

For each source that you have chosen you should do the following things:

4

Page 5: Research and discussion paper

1.Summarise the argument they make in your own words.

2.Quote any evidence they give, whether it is statistical or case studies.

3.Make sure that you credit the source of the information by giving a book reference or a web address.

This can be done by using footnotes in your article.

At the end, sum up the strongest parts of the argument against the statement. Try to make your argument

flow together, so it is easy to read. You are aiming to write a piece that is strongly against your statement,

and is convincing to the reader that the statement is false. This will be a combination of your own ideas

and the evidence you have found.

Guide Sheet for Writing the Conclusion Name

Contentious statement

Your role is to conclude the paper. This is a very crucial piece of writing, and can go in one of three ways.

In each case you must use the evidence that the two people writing the arguments have found. You will

need to discuss, as a group, which argument is the most convincing. In the end it is your final decision, and

you may decide in one of these ways:

1.The statement is true. If this is the case you need to explain why the arguments and evidence for the

statement are stronger than those against.

2. The statement is false. If this is the case you need to explain why the arguments and evidence against

the statement are stronger than those for it.

3. The answer is more complicated than that. There may be some aspects that are true, but it might not be

true in all cases or situations. In this case you need to describe when it is true and when it is false. Or,

possibly, there is not yet enough evidence to be able to make a clear decision. If this is the case, can you

suggest any research that might help us decide?

However you decide, your role is to compare the two arguments and contrast them. Try to bring conflicting

evidence together and explain why it conflicts. Try to weigh up conflicting arguments.

In order to write your conclusion, you will need to have a good understanding of the evidence and

arguments before you write. This means you need to help and support the researchers while they are

finding their evidence. You cannot start writing until they have gathered all their information.

5

Page 6: Research and discussion paper

Keep going back to the researchers and reading what they are writing. This will help you make your

conclusion fit well with the previous work. You must use the evidence they have brought up rather than

any opinion you may have had before starting on the work.

6