Rescuing the “e-University” concept

30
1 Rescuing the “e-University” concept Earlier work on Critical Success Factors revisited Professor Paul Bacsich Campus Futurus, 22 March 2004, Oulu, Finland

description

Rescuing the “e-University” concept. Earlier work on Critical Success Factors revisited. Professor Paul Bacsich Campus Futurus, 22 March 2004, Oulu, Finland. Contents. Posing the problem Review of the theory of “the e-University” Revised criteria: a new synthesis Conclusions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Rescuing the “e-University” concept

Page 1: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

1

Rescuing the “e-University”

conceptEarlier work on

Critical Success Factors revisited

Professor Paul Bacsich

Campus Futurus, 22 March 2004, Oulu, Finland

Page 2: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

2

Contents

Posing the problem

Review of the theory of “the e-University”

Revised criteria: a new synthesis

Conclusions

Page 3: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

3

The problem

Page 4: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

4

The problem

Most commercial e-universities have failed, downsized or overspent their development funds

Many public sector e-universities have also had problems

These have affected both single-institution and consortia models

The problem is neither purely a dot-com issue or confined to the “English” world

So what is going wrong? And how can it be put right?

Page 5: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

5

My background Worked on telewriting and videotex for learning

in UKOU in 1977-83 Analytic work for EU and EADTU in 1980s Early CMC work from 1984: Australia and UK Introduced FirstClass to UKOU in 1991 (JANUS

project under EU FP3 “DELTA”) Set up Virtual Campus Sheffield Hallam U: 1997 Consultancy work for “e-U” then UKeU: 2000 on Analytic work on “Virtual U’s” - UNESCO: 2001

Page 6: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

6

The theory

Page 7: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

7

Global eLearning trends

“A successful knowledge-based economy depends upon availability of skill sets”

“Governments are determined to deliver step change in higher education outcomes”

Growing competition for in-demand skills In-country provision important for recruitment and

retention

“Growing use of technology-based learning”

Page 8: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

8

e-universities in UK

Open University (UK)

University for Industry (UK)

UK eUniversities Worldwide Limited (UKeU)

NHS University

Russell Group consortia: WUN and U21

Post-92 universities – Virtual Campuses

Scotland: Interactive University

Page 9: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

9

UK: Oxbridge and Russell Group

World University Network (WUN) Sheffield, Leeds, York, Bristol, Manchester,

Southampton – plus US partners

Universitas21: Birmingham, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Nottingham

Cambridge-OU alliance (UKeU pilot) Oxford with Stanford, Princeton, etc

Page 10: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

10

UK: New Universities Sheffield Hallam

early Virtual Campus Robert Gordons (Scotland)

early Virtual Campus Ulster (N Ireland)

later Virtual Campus Glamorgan (Wales) Middlesex (London) Global University Alliance: Derby+Glamorgan

plus others non-UK hosted by NextEd

Page 11: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

11

And around the world

Australia: Deakin, Edith Cowan, USQ… Canada: Athabasca, [OLA]…. Germany: FernUniversitat Dutch Ou, Dutch Digital U Finnish VU Swiss VU India: IGNU Mexico: Tec de Monterrey China: CCRTVU

Page 12: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

12

Types of e-university

Green fields/new build – e.g. TechBC Consortium “Orange skin” – Virtual Campus Those run or serviced

by non-HE organisations

Page 13: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

13

Purposes behind e-universities

Government initiative: national or regional or local

International initiatives: AVU; ITU; UN VU (environment) several imminent examples in Mid East now

Business opportunity: Publisher Broadcaster IT company

Page 14: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

14

Critical Success Factors for Consortia

Binding energy

Organisational homogeneity

or managed diversity

Stratification

Linguistic homogeneity

Bacsich, for UNESCO

Page 15: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

15

Alternative view

Bottom up is good Realism Common vision

yet clear differentiation of roles Management and marketing (funded) Contracts in place and accepted by all Role models of other consortia

Harasim, TL-NCE

Page 16: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

16

European view (Bavarian VU)

Clear goals Sufficient funds Definition of USP Clear target group and proposition/programmes High quality Student-centred pedagogy Solid marketing strategy, growth-oriented Common execution of project across partners Common organisational structure Centralised organisational structure, specified

responsibilities

Page 17: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

17

Other issues

National responses still confused many agencies without clear mission

Increasing consensus on mainstream e-pedagogy and evaluationbut big national differences on how seriously cost-effectiveness issues are addressed

Truly international consortia do not yet exist E-learning still growing through DL

But many institutions slow to change

Page 18: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

18

But not enough

Few big successes: Phoenix Online, UMUC

Many failures or problems US: WGU, Fathom, NYUOnline, US OU Even Cardean much shrunken Canada: TechBC, OLA Dutch Ou Scottish Knowledge UK: HEFCE statement on UKeU,

frequent adverse comment on Ufi

Page 19: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

19

Reasons

They - or their funders? - did not understand the existing CSF literature - likely

New CSFs are emerging - also likely Bad luck - not likely for all Bad management - likely for some

Page 20: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

20

Commercial e-Unis need to learn that...

Market-led courses are essential, even though market research is hard

“Time to market” is crucial “Quality” is not a differentiator; price is; brand

may be MLE functionality is not now a differentiator It is not really an English-speaking world in

HE, or even a 56 kbps world They must be a university and a company -

few can do that

Page 21: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

21

Public-sector e-Unis need to learn that...

There still must be a business model even if it is not commercial, funds do not just appear!

Flow of funds to partner unis is always an issue

Open source is part of an answer not the answer (cf Malaysia)

Consortia are hard to manage, especially large ones (earlier CSFs are still valid)

While a single MLE may not be acceptable in a consortium, interoperability is not yet “there”

Page 22: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

22

Non-degree courses

Almost all successful e-universities have a substantial non-degree programme

OU, UOC, IU (SCHOLAR) This allows focus on individual training (e.g. in

IT), a corporate focus, smaller modules, less regulatory burden, less dependence on partner universities, etc etc

Page 23: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

23

On pedagogy

There is no world consensus on pedagogy, not even across the Atlantic!

Very often the “pedagogic consensus” is not even explicit

Many pedagogic theories are not sustainable in business terms or in terms of what students (or employers or regulators) want

Especially in international operations, one must be flexible in pedagogy

Page 24: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

24

On sales/marketing/PR

It is essential There is not the financial margin in the system

to use conventional techniques (people, press, TV, etc) especially across the world

A weightless product needs weightless techniques

Corporate customers are cautious, they do not choose newcomer suppliers

It is hard to avoid competing with your suppliers/partners

Page 25: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

25

Remaining factors... Intellectual Property is much talked about as

an issue But it is not a CSF “show-stopper”

Ethical considerations are starting to inhibit research/evaluationand the situation could get worse

Staff development is an endless and thankless task, but must be done again and again, as staff move on and retire

Page 26: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

26

Remaining factors (ctd)

Accessibility issues are starting to inhibit innovation in mass deployment

Will get worse if a “compliance culture” spreads out

Multi-standard services (PC/Mac/Unix) are getting harder to do and more restrictive in functionality

Lack of clear view on “mid-band” (512 kbps) is inhibiting service development

Page 27: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

27

Further recommendations Have plenty of funds, not all commercial Hire some “names” from the university sector Adapt existing systems; do a gap analysis;

do not build from scratch!!! If commercial, accept the need for sales staff and

value their input; if public-sector, do good PR Keep a close eye on competitors - they always exist Get the outsourcing strategy right Have an innovation strategy - in Europe, FP6 Be pragmatic – survival is the prime imperative!

Page 28: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

28

Standards “Learning object” concept has difficulties that

must be overcome

IMS – good work but still early days

EML (Dutch Open universiteit) – interesting

Assessment needs much more focus both MCQs and assignments

Interoperability still hard - and how essential?

Major challenge is still co-operative learning

Page 29: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

29

Is research useful? European research: FP3 set the scene;

FP4 added little, FP5 more; FP6? Canadian work lacked evidence of scalable

approaches and discontinuity with TL-NCE Too much gap between theorists and industrial-

strength pedagogic practicetheorists are usually in universities and not seriously active in e-learning services

US still too synchronous and transmissive Australia too fragmented but key institutions Big IT companies need convincing that research

is directly relevant

Page 30: Rescuing the   “e-University” concept

30

Thanks to UNESCO, EU, HEFCE, British Council, DFID,Canada, Australia, Finland,

UKOU, SHU and UKeU

Paul Bacsich

[email protected]