Request to Construct Splash Park at Farwell Park-Dec 2015 (1)

7/23/2019 Request to Construct Splash Park at Farwell Park-Dec 2015 (1)

1/14


2/14


3/14

City of RevelstokeCouncil Report

Quality of LifeThe City of Revelstoke will emphasize quality of life issues includingsocial, active living, cultural experiences and recreation opportunities.

Others Consulted:

Mike Thomas, Director of EngineeringDarren Komonoski, Operations ManagerGraham Inglis, Director of FinanceInterior Health Authority (IHA)

Attachments:

Attachment A - Splash Park Options Report

Respectfully submitted,


4/14

2

Splash Park Options Report


5/14

Splash Park Options ReportSeptember 16th, 20

Assumptions in this report:

The following assumptions have been made in this report:

A variety of interactive play features that promote creativity and imagination ar

important for the success and longevity of this park.

The proposal put forward by the Revy Splash group included 9 interactive play

features.

The target market is ages 0 9 years.

The splash park will be located at Farwell Park.

The park will be open during the months of June, July & August

There are three essential elements that a splash park will require:

Water Electricity

Sufficient drainage


6/14


the systems flow rate. To provide safe use of recycled water at splash parks, staff

experienced in pool operations must be present on a daily basis to monitor, manage an

maintain the water recirculating system. Recirculating systems must meet all

provisions of the Pool Regulation (i.e. would need to function like the Aquatic Centre

Facility).

Option 2 - Flow through system:

In a flow-through system, water from a potable source is pumped onto the pad and

allowed to drain into a municipal storm sewer. This method requires no water

treatment and testing, nor the corresponding expense and staffing expertise. The spla

park features will each have an activator button which turns the water features on whe

a user pushes a button and then automatically shuts them off after a certain amount of

time has elapsed (i.e. 30 seconds). This makes the splash pad more interactive for kids

and reduces water waste when the splash pad is not being used.

A flow through system is exempt from the operating permit required of the Pool

Regulation. However, a general maintenance program will still need to be adopted to

maintain the premises in a physically sound and sanitary state, those specific details a

b d b l


7/14


approximately $ 26.50. As long as the water quality is appropriate, we can keep treatin

the same water. The tank will need to be drained to a third full for winterization, so th

majority of the water is being replaced each season.

3. Operational Costs:

These costs include the cost of water, electricity, staff, permits, and chemicals required

for the normal operation of the facility. Estimated operating costs associated with each

water management option are included in Attachment B.

Recirculation

System

Flow Through

System

IHA annual operating permit

Certified pool operator to

manage system (water testing 2-3 times /

day)

Certification

required

Does not require

certificationGeneral maintenance program

Daily inspection of equipment

Daily inspection for garbage broken glass


8/14


Recirculation systems must adhere to the pool regulation and will be subject to IHA

permitting, water sampling and inspections.

Flow-through systems are not subject to the Pool Regulation and therefore not

inspected by the Interior Health Authority, unless there are reported concerns. It is the

municipalitys responsibility to ensure the healthy and safe operation of the splash par

facility. A general maintenance program will need to be adopted for either system.

6.

Site Considerations:The wading pool at Farwell Park was closed on June 25th, 2013. Since the closure of th

wading pool, there has been discussion amongst the community surrounding the fate

Farwell Park and the possibility of constructing a splash park at this location. At this

time, other sites have not been explored. Through this exercise, staff has learned that

splash park is more than just a splash pad with water features; it includes the

surrounding area, amenities provided and the overall environment created by thedesign elements. Splash parks in other communities are located within their best park

away from heavily treed areas and in close proximity to other public amenities (i.e.

picnic areas, pools and community centres). However, it has also been noted that


9/14


8. Pricing Options:

Option 1 Spray park features $ 101,996.30

Installation $ 105,588.00 (cost varies depending on water management option chosen

$ 207,584.30


Installation $ 85,000.00(cost varies depending on water management option chosen

$ 160,000.00


Installation $ 75,000.00(cost varies depending on water management option chosen

$ 130,000.00(With Option 3, the play value of the park is compromised substantially. This could affect how

well the park is used).


10/14


Discount Rate 2% 2.50% 3% 3.50%

Flow through $ 807,506 $ 783,328 $ 761,086 $ 740,604

Recirculation $ 771,184 $ 762,392 $ 754,304 $ 746,856

Difference $ 36,322 $ 20,936 $ 6,782 $ 6,252

10.Policy and Practice in Other Municipalities:

Consultations with other municipalities have found that the majority of communities

have constructed a splash park facility with a flow-through system. The number one

reason being the cost of the water recirculation system. The majority of these projects

were initiated and funded by main sponsors with a modest capital contribution from

the municipality (Attachment D).


11/14

ATTACHMENT B Summary of Water Management Options

Water ManagementOptions

Description Pros Cons Total Project Costs(Estimates)

Potable, drain to waste

systems

Water is used to feed thefeatures in the park andwater is drained to thestorm / waste watersystem.

Low cost option for smallparks with low waterusage.

System is exempt from theoperating permitrequirements.

No staff required.

Inefficient use of water.Capital Costs: $ 378,000

Estimated Operating Costs:Approximately $ 22,000 / year

Water treatment /

recirculating system

Water is drained into aholding tank, treated andthen reused in the park.Size and cost of a treatedwater system will varydepending on the size of

the spary park, number offeatures, and theirrelative water flow rates.Usage expectations forthe park and the type ofdisinfection required (i.e.chlorine only, chlorineplus ultraviolet light) alsoplay a factor in the cost.

Best solution for largerparks or areas with strictwater policies.

Supports the principles /strategies of waterconservation.

Environmentally friendlyoption.

Most expensive option. Must adhere to pool

regulation guidelines. Requires annual

operating permit. Requires daily

maintenance by certifiedpool operator.

Additional staffing andon-going maintenancecosts.

Capital Costs: $ 615,000

Estimated Operating Costs:Approximately $ 10,000 / year

Retain and reuse systems: Greywater is collectedand utilized for otherapplications such asirrigation and washroomfacilities.

Supports the principles /strategies of waterconservation.

Retain and reusesystems are relativelynew concepts.

Implementation of thistype of system requires

advance approval fromlocal public healthauthorities.

This type of system would need tobe quoted by an Engineer.


12/14

ATTACHMENT C Site Evaluation Criteria

Selection Criteria Rate

(H/M/L)

Centennial

Park

Kovach

Park

Queen

E. Park

Beruschi

Park

Big Eddy

Park

Moberly

Park

Moose

Park

Farwell

Park

Notes:

Access to Utilities

Access to Washroom

Facility

Central/ Accessible

Location

Foot & Bike Access

Landscaping

NeighbourhoodSupport

Parking Availability

Size of Site

Visibility for Safety &

Awareness


13/14

ATTACHMENT D - Splash Park Comparisons

Municipality Size Proposed

Budget

Actual

Cost

Concrete/Rubber

Padding

Flow-

Through/Recycled

Water System

Challenges Financial

Contributions

Golden 800 sq ft $240,000 Concrete Flow-through Recycled system was too

much money.

Taxation, CBT, Rick

Hansen Foundation &

Local Businesses.

Invermere 8 features $ 320,000 $ 332,000

(does not

include

servicing

costs)

Concrete Flow-through Washroom requirement,

funding, location, IHA

Permitting

Rotary was main

sponsor ($275K), other

donors include TSN &

Kraft Cda ($25K), RMI,

DOI ($50K) & Build

washroom facility.

Osoyoos 2,400 sq ft $250,000-

$300,000

$271,100 Both Flow-through Fundraising, dealing

with Interior Health-

potable water, drain

away system verses a

recirculated system,

location

Rotary main sponsor,

other corporate

sponsors included

Telus, Fortis, Tim

Hortons and grants

Salmon Arm 2,162 sq ft

3,417 sq ft with

overspray area

$300,000 $371,200 Concrete Flow-through butrecommend

recycled

When the city usedoutside contractors vs

RecTec contractors-

miscommunication

occurred on a few items

during install.

Rotary was mainsponsor. City,

Donations,

Kimberly Undetermined

but will have 8

features

$300,000 Not built

yet

Concrete (possible

rubber coating)

Flow-through Community group

believes it is a waste of

water, raising money.

Corporate sponsors,

grants, online

fundraising. Rotary will

fund any large

replacement costs.


14/14

Clearwater 1,313.24 sq feet

2,615.72 sq feet

with overspray

area

$300,000 Not built

yet.

Concrete Flow-through Success by Six raising

the money through

grants and local

fundraising. City

donating land.

Request to Construct Splash Park at Farwell Park-Dec 2015 (1)

Documents

Transcript of Request to Construct Splash Park at Farwell Park-Dec 2015 (1)