Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward,...

48
Request for Proposal (RFP) For Beecher Lake Channel Dredge Posting Date: July 17, 2015 Response Deadline: August 14, 2015 4:00 p.m. Central Standard Time (CST) To: Joseph Siudzinski Beecher Lake Channel Dredge 648 Hoganwood Circle Sobieski, WI 54171

Transcript of Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward,...

Page 1: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Request for Proposal (RFP)

For

Beecher Lake Channel Dredge

Posting Date: July 17, 2015

Response Deadline: August 14, 2015

4:00 p.m. Central Standard Time (CST)

To: Joseph Siudzinski

Beecher Lake Channel Dredge 648 Hoganwood Circle

Sobieski, WI 54171

Page 2: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 2

Table of Contents

I. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 3

II. TENTATIVE PROJECT TIMELINE............................................................................................. 3

III. RFP DUE DATE ...................................................................................................................... 3

IV. ON-SITE CONTRACTORS MEETING ............................................................................. 4

V. RFP QUESTIONS .................................................................................................................... 4

VI. RFP SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................... 4

VII. PROPOSAL FORMAT ............................................................................................................. 5

VIII. SCOPE OF SERVICES .............................................................................................................. 5

IX. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND CONTINGENCIES .............................................................. 5

X. CONTRACT TERMS ................................................................................................................ 6

XI. REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 6

XII. FINANCIAL VERIFICATION ..................................................................................................... 6

XIII. OTHER ................................................................................................................................... 6

WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE: ........................................................................ 6

AUTO LIABILITY INSURANCE: ........................................................................................... 7

GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE:...................................................................................... 7

ADDITIONAL INSURED ...................................................................................................... 7

SUBCONTRACTOR ............................................................................................................ 7

WAVIER OF SUBROGATION.............................................................................................. 7

CANCELLATION NOTICE ................................................................................................... 7

PROOF OF INSURANCE ..................................................................................................... 7

XIV. PROJECT CHANGES ............................................................................................................... 7

XV. ATTACHMENTS ..................................................................................................................... 7

Page 3: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 3

I. BACKGROUND Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District is requesting proposals for the construction of a dredged channel in Beecher Lake located in Sec. 28 T36N R20E, Town of Beecher, Marinette County Wisconsin.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of the RFP, Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to waive any irregularity or informality in a proposal, and to accept or reject any item or a combination of items when doing so would be to the advantage of Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District or its taxpayers.

It is further within the right of Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District to reject proposals that do not contain all elements and information requested in this document. Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District shall not be liable for any losses incurred by the contractor making the proposal throughout this process. The cost of preparing a response to this RFP is not reimbursable in part or in whole to the contractor. Any proposal received will become the property of Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District and a matter of public record.

II. TENTATIVE PROJECT TIMELINE

RFP posted by 4:30 p.m. July 17, 2015 On-site contractors meeting 10:00 a.m. July 27, 2015 RFP questions due by 10:00 a.m. July 30, 2015 RFP questions answered by 4:00 p.m. August 4, 2015 RFP proposals due from potential vendors by 4:00 p.m. August 14, 2015 RFP proposals opened at the Beecher Town Hall at 9:00 am August 15, 2015

III. RFP DUE DATE

Proposals shall be submitted to the Aquatic Committee Chairperson by no later than 4:00 p.m. central time on Friday, August 14, 2015. Proposals shall be clearly labeled Beecher Lake Channel Dredge and submitted to the location/address listed below.

Delivery Address for Hand Delivery, USPS, UPS, DHL, Fed X: Joseph Siudzinski Beecher Lake Channel Dredge 648 Hoganwood Circle Sobienski, WI 54171 Each proposal must be received by the due date and time set for this RFP. A proposal received after the established deadline will not be considered.

Page 4: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 4

IV. ON-SITE CONTRACTOR MEETING An on-site contractors meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. CST on Monday July 27, 2015 at the Beecher Lake dam. Vendors are not required to attend the contractors meeting to submit a proposal.

V. RFP QUESTIONS

All questions related to this RFP must be submitted not later than 10:00 a.m. CST, July 30, 2015, via e-mail to [email protected] with “Questions for Beecher Lake Channel Dredge” clearly in the subject line. Phone call or faxed questions will not be accepted.

Answers to questions will be posted in the form of an addendum to the RFP and placed on the Marinette County website http://www.marinettecounty.com on August 4, 2015, not later than 4:00 p.m. CST. It is the responsibility of all interested vendors to access the website for this information. Calls for assistance with the website may be made to (715) 732-7780.

VI. RFP SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS The proposal shall be sealed and labeled with the following information:

Beecher Lake Channel Dredge Name of Consultant Address Contact Person Telephone and Facsimile Number E-mail Address

One original response and four (4) copies are required to be submitted. The proposal must include the following:

Statement of Qualifications Attachment A Fee Schedule Attachment B Reference Sheet Attachment C Statement of Understanding Attachment D Addendum Sheet, if applicable Attachment E

The vendor shall specify the total cost for the channel dredge project.

Upon award of the contract, the selected vendor will be required to submit a federal W-9 Form and payment address to Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District. The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements of this RFP.

A vendor may withdraw or modify its proposal prior to the proposal due date. Any changes or withdrawals must be made in writing prior to the proposal due date.

Page 5: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 5

VII. PROPOSAL FORMAT Proposals shall be typewritten on standard 8½” x 11” paper. Larger paper is permissible for charts, spreadsheets, or similar documents.

Proposals should be prepared in a simple, cost effective format providing a straightforward concise description of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements of the RFP. The use of elaborate materials and the inclusion of additional information that has no direct bearing on the project are not desired. Emphasis should be concentrated on accuracy, completeness, and clarity of content. All parts, pages, figures, and tables should be numbered and clearly labeled.

VIII. SCOPE OF SERVICES

Construction of a dredged channel in Beecher Lake located in Sec. 28 T36N R20E, Town of Beecher, Marinette County Wisconsin, and reclamation/stabilization of dredge spoils in accordance with the attached construction plan.

IX. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND CONTINGENCIES The Beecher Lake Channel Dredge Project is the final part of a three phase project:

Phase I - Successful completion of a partial drawdown of Beecher Lake using siphons. According to WDNR permit the partial drawdown must be completed by October 31, 2015. The Beecher Lake District is responsible for installation and maintenance of the siphons. Phase II (Beecher Lake Dam Modification RFP) - Installation of a low level drain and valve system through the Beecher Lake dam for the purpose of maintaining the partial drawdown. Dam modification will be let under a separate RFP and is required to be completed by January 15, 2016. Phase III (Beecher Lake Channel Dredge RFP) - Construction of a dredged channel between the drain intake structure and the main body of Beecher Lake according to the attached construction plan. Dredging must be completed during the winter months before ice-out in the spring of 2016.

Construction of the dredged channel (phase III) is contingent upon successful completion of phase I and phase II, and sufficient freezing of the lake bed to support machinery required to complete the dredging project, all WDNR permit approvals to be received by September 1, 2015, and final financial approval by the Beecher Lake Tax District attendees at the Annual Meeting on September 5, 2015. Dredging can commence after completion of phase II as soon as the lake bed is sufficiently frozen to support dredging equipment. The project must be completed before ice-out in the spring of 2016. If, due to weather or other unforeseen events, phase I and phase II of the project cannot be achieved as scheduled, the project will be postponed until the fall and winter of 2016/2017. The total cost quoted by the vendor shall cover the contingency period.

Page 6: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 6

X. CONTRACT TERMS

The vendor may provide a contract to be approved by Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District. If the vendor does not provide a contract, the vendor shall be required to sign a contract similar to Attachment F.

XI. REFERENCES Each prospective vendor shall provide at least two references and not more than three in which one is required to be in the public sector. References should be based on projects of similar size and scope using the provided Reference Sheet, Attachment C.

XII. FINANCIAL VERIFICATION

Vendor’s financial solvency may be verified through financial background checks via Dun & Bradstreet or other means prior to contract award. Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District reserves the right to reject Proposals based on information obtained through these background checks.

XIII. OTHER

All work shall conform to all applicable industry standards, federal, state and local laws, codes and ordinances. No vendor will be provided with financial and/or competitive vendor information on this Proposal until after the award of contract has been made. At that time, all Proposals will be available for review in accordance with the Wisconsin Open Records Law. Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District shall not be held liable for any claims arising from disclosure required under the Wisconsin Open Records Law.

Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District is exempt from payment of all federal, state and local taxes on its purchases except Wisconsin excise taxes.

Any contract between vendor and Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District shall be subject to the laws of the State of Wisconsin. In connection with the performance of work under such contract, the vendor agrees not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, race, religion, color, handicap, sex, physical condition, developmental disability, sexual orientation, or national origin.

By responding to this Proposal, prospective vendors acknowledge and accept the attachments, including insurance requirements and service template contract sample attached. WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE:

Vendor shall provide statutory workers compensation insurance coverage for its employees who will not be considered employees of Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District in any way.

Page 7: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 7

AUTO LIABILITY INSURANCE:

Vendor shall provide a minimum of $300,000 per occurrence to cover bodily injury and property damage arising out of ownership, maintenance, or use of any motor vehicle, including non-owned and hired. GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE:

Vendor shall provide a minimum limit of $1,000,000 per occurrence broad form coverage. ADDITIONAL INSURED

The vendor agrees that all liability coverage policies shall name Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District as additional insured with respects to liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the vendor/contractor; products and completed operations of vendor/contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by vendor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by vendor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection to the Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District.

SUBCONTRACTOR

Subcontractors of the vendor are subject to the same requirements as is vendor.

WAVIER OF SUBROGATION

Insurers shall waive all subrogation rights against Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District on all policies required under this section.

CANCELLATION NOTICE

Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District will be given a 30 day notice in advance of cancellation, non-renewal, or material change in coverage.

PROOF OF INSURANCE

Valid Certificates of Insurance shall be issued to Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District prior to the execution of the contract.

XIV. PROJECT CHANGES Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District reserves the right to make changes to the project. Any changes in the scope of services shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the Vendor and the Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District.

XV. ATTACHMENTS Statement of Qualifications, Attachment A Fee Schedule, Attachment B Reference Sheet, Attachment C

Page 8: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 8

Statement of Understanding, Attachment D Addendum Sheet, if applicable, Attachment E Sample Contract, Attachment F

Page 9: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 9

ATTACHMENT A

Beecher Lake Channel Dredging

Statement of Qualification

All questions shall be answered and the information given shall be clear and comprehensive. If necessary, questions may be answered in the same order on separate attached sheets. Please submit any additional information you feel is pertinent. 1. Company Name (individual, partnership or corporation)

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. Office Address

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3. Phone and Fax Numbers

__________________________________________________________________________ 4. How many years have you been engaged in the excavation/construction business under

your present company name? __________________________________________________________________________

5. Type of work your company presently performs

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

6. List your experience in projects the same or similar to this project. Please include multiple

projects and provide the cost, month and year of project completion. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Page 10: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 10

Statement of Qualification

7. Identify experience/training of those employees that will be working on this project.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The undersigned hereby authorizes and requests any person, firm or corporation to furnish any information requested by Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District in verification of the recitals comprising this Statement of Qualifications.

Dated this ___________ day of _____________________, 2015

____________________________________________ Name (Individual, Partnership or Corporation) By: ____________________________________________ Signature/Title

Page 11: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 11

ATTACHMENT B

Beecher Lake Channel Dredging

Fee Schedule

Please identify all costs associated with the item outlined below. Also provide the District with a schedule of labor rates, fees and other expenses that can be used for any unanticipated tasks. Item Item Cost 1. Mobilization/Demobilization of Dredge Equipment $______________ 2. Mobilization, Use, and Demobilization of Heavy Equipment Mats as Needed $_______________ 3. Erosion Control Fence Installation $_______________ 4. Clear Access Road and Staging Area $_______________ 5. Armor Shoreline Access $_______________ 6. Armor Road Access Point $_______________ 7. Dredge Spoil Disposal Area Preparation $_______________ 8. Dredging and Spoils Disposal $_______________ 9. Dredge Spoils Grading and Reclamation $_______________ 10. Access Road, Staging Area, and Shoreline Access Reclamation $_______________ Total Cost $______________ The undersigned hereby certifies that they have the knowledge, staffing and expertise necessary to complete the above identified tasks in accordance with the State Statues and Administrative Codes of the State of Wisconsin.

Dated this ___________ day of _____________________, 2015

____________________________________________ Name (Individual, Partnership or Corporation) By: ____________________________________________ Signature/Title

Page 12: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 12

ATTACHMENT C

Beecher Lake Channel Dredging Reference Data Sheet

(Use of this form is required when submitting proposal)

Provide a list of at least 2 and not greater than 3 customer references with at least one public sector customer. Agency:

Address:

Telephone:

Contact Person:

Agency:

Address:

Telephone:

Contact Person:

Agency:

Address:

Telephone:

Contact Person:

Page 13: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 13

ATTACHMENT D

Beecher Lake Channel Dredging Statement of Understanding of Proposal

____________________________________ Vendor name ____________________________________ Vendor’s address

____________________________________ City State Zip code

____________________________________ Contact person’s name & position

_____________________________________________________________ Vendor’s Phone number Vendor’s Fax Number

We have read the District’s Request for Proposals (RFP) for Beecher Lake Channel Dredging and fully understand its intent. We certify that we have adequate personnel and equipment to perform said services. We understand our ability and fitness to perform shall be judged solely by Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District. In addition, we certify that:

(a) Our proposal is not made in the interest or on behalf of any person not named therein;

(b) We have not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any person to submit a

false or misleading proposal or to refrain from proposing;

(c) We have not in any manner sought by collusion to secure an advantage over any other vendor;

(d) We have thoroughly examined the RFP requirements, and our proposed fees

cover all costs for service/equipment we have proposed; and

(e) We acknowledge and accept all the terms and conditions included in the RFP ________________________________ _________________ Signature of vendor or vendor’s Representative Date

Page 14: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 14

ATTACHMENT E

Beecher Lake Channel Dredging Addendum Sheet

(If Addendums exist for this project, please sign, date, and submit with Proposal.)

The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the following addenda:

Addendum #1 Initials Addendum #2 Initials Addendum #3 Initials Addendum #4 Initials Addendum #5 Initials The undersigned agrees with the following statement: I have examined and carefully prepared the response to proposal from the plans and specifications and have checked the same in detail before submitting to Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District. Name Signature Date All vendors are responsible to check for addenda, posted on the county website at www.marinettecounty.com, for this project prior to the due date. No notification will be sent if addenda are posted unless there is an addendum within three (3) business days of RFP due date. All vendors receiving initial notification of project will be notified by Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District of all addenda issued within three (3) business days prior to due date. If a RFP has already been submitted, vendor is required to acknowledge receipt of addendum via fax or e-mail prior to due date. A new RFP response must be submitted by vendor if addendum affects costs. Vendors that do not have internet access are responsible to contact Marinette County Land Information Office at 715-732-7780 to ensure receipt of addenda issued. RFPs that do not acknowledge addendums may be rejected.

Page 15: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 15

All RFPs submitted shall be sealed. Envelopes are to be clearly marked with required information. Sealed RFPs that are opened by mistake due to inadequate markings on the outside may be rejected and returned to the vendor.

Page 16: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 16

ATTACHMENT F

Beecher Lake Channel Dredging

BEECHER AND UPPER LAKES PUBLIC INLAND LAKE PROTECTION AND REHABILITATION

DISTRICT SAMPLE AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and

Rehabilitation District, a municipality, hereinafter referred to as DISTRICT, and

________________________________, hereinafter referred to as VENDOR, for the purpose of _________________________________________________________. The parties agree as follows: 1. Contact Persons and Contract Administrators:

DISTRICT’s agent and contact person is: Name Whose principal business address is: Address

Marinette WI 54143

VENDOR agent and contact person is:

Name: Title: Company: Address: City, State:

Telephone: 2. VENDOR agrees the following services, as set forth in the response to the Request for

Proposal (RFP) dated ____________________ will be provided to Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District.

3. VENDOR agrees to present manufacturer’s literature regarding materials & warranty.

4. Start/Completion dates to be determined.

5. DISTRICT agrees to the following payment terms:

DISTRICT will pay the VENDOR 85% of dredging costs within 30 days of receipt of an invoice after dredging is complete.

DISTRICT will pay the VENDOR the balance within 30 days of receipt of an invoice after final stabilization and reclamation of access roads, disturbed shoreline areas, and dredge spoil disposal sites.

6. Both parties agree that the relationship between the parties shall be that of an independent VENDOR and shall not be construed to be an Employer-Employee relationship; specifically the parties agree that:

Page 17: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Page 17

VENDOR will be responsible to pay all Federal, State and social security taxes on any income received under this Agreement.

DISTRICT will pay no fringe benefits or other compensation to VENDOR. 7. VENDOR will provide and maintain certificates of insurance with minimum limits as

follows: General liability, each occurrence $1,000,000 Auto liability, each occurrence $ 300,000 Workers Compensation Statutory Requirements

Certificates of insurance indicating DISTRICT as additional insured must be presented to DISTRICT’s agent with a signed copy of this agreement prior to commencing work. Additionally, all policies shall contain endorsements by respective insurance companies waiving all rights of subrogation, if any, against DISTRICT and shall further provide that policies are not cancelable except upon thirty days written notice to DISTRICT.

8. VENDOR hereby agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold harmless Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District, its officials, officers, employees and agents from and against all judgments, damages, penalties, losses, costs, claims, expenses, suits, demands, debts, actions and/or causes of action of any type or nature whatsoever, including actual and reasonable attorney fees, which may be sustained or to which they may be exposed, directly or indirectly, by reason of personal injury, death, property damage, or other liability, alleged or proven, resulting from or arising out of the performance under this agreement by vendor, its officers, officials, employees, agent or assigns. Beecher and Upper Lakes Public Inland Lake Protection and Rehabilitation District does not waive, and specifically reserves, its right to assert any and all affirmative defenses and limitations of liability as specifically set forth in Wisconsin Statutes, Chapter 893 and related statutes.

9. This contract may be amended in writing by mutual agreement of both parties at any

time. 10. This agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Wisconsin. 11. DISTRICT may terminate this agreement in the event VENDOR breaches any of the terms

of the agreement or for unsatisfactory performance by VENDOR. Termination shall be immediate upon written notification by the DISTRICT.

__________________________________________________ _____________________ VENDOR Date _________________________________________________ _____________________ Signature of District’s Representative Date

Page 18: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

NRCS/DATCP

CONSTRUCTION PLAN PRACTICE: Beecher Lk. Dredge Proj

OWNER: Beecher Lake District PHONE: "715-739-1213"

ADDRESS: Dam Road COUNTY: Marinette

TOWNSHIP: Town of Beecher T36N ; R19E ; SEC. 28

LOCAL OFFICE: Marinette Co. LWCD TEL. # :"715-732-7528"

DIGGERS HOTLINE

Call 3 Work Days

Before You Dig

Toll Free

1-800-242-8511

LOCATION MAP

** NOTICE TO LANDOWNERS AND CONTRACTORS REGARDING UTILITIES **

No representation is made by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation

Service or the County Land Conservation Dept. as to the existence

or nonexistence of underground hazards. Prior to the start of

construction the owners of utilities must be notified of the

pending construction. You will be liable for damages resulting from

construction activities! (Call Diggers Hotline)

CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ACCEPTANCE

I have reviewed and do accept the attached plans. I agree to

have this project constructed in accordance with these plans and

specifications and to notify all affected utility companies.

I agree that any changes made during construction will be

pre-approved by an authorized NRCS or County agent.

Signed: Date:

Designed by: C.Druckrey Date: Jul-15

Checked by: Date:

Approved by: Date:

Approved by: Date:

SHEET 1 of

Page 19: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Construction Notes Beecher Lake Channel Dredging Project

1. Construction shall be completed according to the following schedule a. September 2015 - The lake level will be lowered using siphons. The target date

for completing the partial drawdown is September 30, 2015. b. November – December 2015 - After the water level drawdown is complete, a

low-level drain pipe and valve assembly will be installed in the dam. c. January – February 2016 - Dredging can begin after the drain pipe is installed and

operational, and after the exposed lake bed is sufficiently frozen to support construction equipment. If snow depth prevents frost penetration Beecher Lake District will pack the snow on the lake bed and access road using snowmobiles. It may be necessary for the contractor to plow the snow aside to promote frost penetration.

2. The contactor is responsible for having timber mats available if needed to access unstable areas with poor frost penetration.

3. Construction equipment is restricted to the frozen lakebed. Disturbance to the shoreline is limited to the access road and staging area on the shore.

4. The access road must be armored with riprap at the shoreline and at Dam Road to minimize damage to the shoreline and road surface.

5. Silt fence must be installed to prevent sediment discharge from staging areas.

6. Dredging should begin at the south end of the project site (nearest the dam) and proceed north to the lake.

7. As dredging proceeds, the gate valve at the dam can be closed during dredging

operations to minimize sediment discharge from the lake. After sediment has settled the valve can be opened to maintain the drawdown level.

8. At full drawdown, the water level in the lake is approximately 2.5 feet higher than the

water level near the dam. As the main body of the lake begins to drain it will likely erode the upper part of the channel and the water level near the dam will quickly rise by nearly 2.5 feet. The outlet pipe should be closed during this period until the sediment settles out. After the pipe is re-opened it may take a few weeks for the rest of the lake to reach the full drawdown level. After the full drawdown level has been reached the eroded portion of the channel should be dredged according to specifications.

Page 20: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

9. The access road, staging area, and any disturbed shoreline areas must be restored to the original grade and planted with a native seed mix according to the attached specification (Practice 342 – Critical Area Planting).

10. The dredge spoil disposal site(s) must be prepared to receive dredge spoils in advance of freeze-up. Any topsoil that can be salvaged should be stripped from the site(s) for use in reclamation. During dredging operations a sufficient amount of organic sediment (muck) should also be placed aside for use as final cover. Silt fence must be installed around the primary sediment disposal site as shown in the construction plan.

11. The dredge spoil disposal area should be graded and reclaimed as soon as practicable in the spring according to the construction plan. Any salvaged topsoil should be used for cover along with the organic sediment. Lime should be incorporated as needed and the entire sediment disposal site seeded with a conservation cover according to the attached specification (Practice 342 – Critical Area Planting).

Page 21: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Dam

Vinge

r

0923

924925

927

929

928

930

931

926

92292

5

926

926

927

928

926

926

0 100 20050

Feet

/ Beecher Lake Dredge ProjectProject Location

Beecher Lake Dam

Equipment Accessand Staging Area

Page 22: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Dam

Vinge

r

929

928

927

930

931

926

925

924

927

925928

925

0 100 20050

Feet

/

Existing channel high point925.4 ft

Beecher Lake Dredging ProjectExisting Contours

Existing channel low point923.7 ft

Beecher Lake Damspillway crest = 930.1 ft

AB

C

D

E

Page 23: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Dam

Vinge

r

0923

924925

929

927 928

930

931

926

922921

928923

926

92692

5

927

926

926

0 100 20050

Feet

/

Channel centerlinelength = 1,350 ft

Beecher Lake Dredge ProjectPlanned Contours

Beecher Lake Damspillway crest = 930.1 ft

AB

C

D

E

Lake elevation = 926.5 ftat time of survey (drawdown)

Intake Pipe924.7 feet

Page 24: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements
Page 25: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements
Page 26: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements
Page 27: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Dam

U.S.

High

way 1

41Peter

son

Weckerle

Tower Line

Cliff

County Road Z

BooneOa

k Lea

f

North

Lake

County Road L

Cindy

Park Fence

B B R

Pinka

rt

Papesh

Parad

ise

Pine Forest

Beach

Bros

el

Pull I

n

Holst

Vinge

r

Arndt

Tucked-a-way

Rosewood

County Road L

0 10.5

Miles

/

Project Area

Dredge Spoil DisposalArea #2

Dredge Spoil DisposalArea #1

Beecher Lake Dredge ProjectDredge Spoil Disposal Areas

Page 28: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

County Road L

North

Lake

0 50 10025

Feet

Cross Section #2

Beecher Lake Dredge ProjectSpoils Disposal Site #1

Cross Section #1

Dredge spoil disposal area

Silt Fence

Page 29: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements
Page 30: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements
Page 31: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Peter

son

Weckerle

U.S.

High

way 1

41

Cindy

Pull I

n

Pinka

rt

Park Fence

0 250 500125

Feet

/ Beecher Lake Dredge ProjectSpoils Disposal Site #2

1.1 ac

0.6 ac

Page 32: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Beecher Lake Dam Modification and Dredging Project Pre-construction photographs of Beecher Lake and Beecher Lake Dam

Page 33: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

South bay of Beecher Lake as seen from Dam Road. The clump of pine trees in the center is the point that juts out into the bay from the west shore.

View of the existing channel from the main body of Beecher Lake looking south at the project area.

Page 34: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

View from a point on west shore of Beecher Lake looking south at the project area. The clump of pines on the right side of the photo is the point that juts out into the lake from the west shore.

View from the point looking north towards the lake (north half of the project area).

Page 35: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

View from the point looking east.

View from the point looking south towards the dam (south half of the project area).

Page 36: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Beecher Lake Dam spillway with siphons installed

Page 37: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Beecher Lake Dam spillway and culverts under Dam Road (view from north side of dam looking south).

Culverts under Dam Road (view from south side of road, in the stream, looking north)

Page 38: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

Conservation Practice Standards are reviewed periodically and updated if needed. To obtain the current version of this standard, NRCS, WI download it from the electronic Field Office Technical Guide, or contact the NRCS State Office or the Wisconsin Land and Water 1/13 Conservation Association office at (608) 441-2677. 1Words in the standard that are shown in italics are described in X. Definitions. The words are italicized the first time they are used in the text.

CRITICAL AREA PLANTING (Acre)

Code 342

Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Practice Standard

I. Definition

Establishing permanent vegetation on sites that have or are expected to have high erosion rates, and on sites that have physical, chemical, or biological conditions that prevent the establishment of vegetation with normal practices.

II. Purposes

This practice may be applied as part of a conservation management system to support one or more of the following purposes.

• Stabilize and restore riparian areas. • Stabilize stream and channel banks and

shorelines. • Stabilize areas with existing or expected high

rates of soil erosion by water or wind. • Rehabilitate and revegetate degraded sites that

cannot be stabilized using normal establishment techniques.

Ill. Conditions Where Practice Applies

This practice applies to highly disturbed areas such as:

• active or abandoned surface mine sites, • urban conservation sites, • road construction areas, • conservation practice construction sites, • areas needing stabilization before or after natural

disasters such as floods, tornados, and wildfires, • eroded banks of natural channels, banks of newly

constructed channels, and lake shorelines, and • areas degraded by human activities.

IV. Federal, Tribal, State and Local Laws

Critical area planting practices shall comply with all federal, tribal, state and local laws, rules or regulations. The landowner and/or operator is responsible for securing required permits. This

standard does not contain the text of the federal, tribal, state or local laws.

V. Criteria

A. General Criteria Applicable To All Purposes.

1. Site Assessment

A site investigation shall be conducted to identify any physical, chemical, or biological conditions that could affect the successful establishment of vegetation. The site investigation shall include evaluation of: soil characteristics, soil fertility, slope, aspect1, moisture regime, climatic patterns, proximity to natural plant community, and site history.

Areas to be planted will be cleared of unwanted materials and smoothed or shaped, if needed, to meet planting and landscaping purposes.

Compacted layers will be ripped and the soil re-firmed prior to seedbed preparation.

On tilled or disturbed sites, prepare a firm seedbed. The seedbed shall contain enough fine particles for uniform shallow coverage of seed and contact with moisture and nutrients. For details on seedbed preparation, refer to Wisconsin Agronomy Technical Notes 5, Establishing and Maintaining Native Grasses, Legumes, and Forbs; and 6, Establishing and Maintaining Introduced Grasses and Legumes.

2. Specie Selection and Seed Quality

Species selected for planting shall be suited to current site conditions, intended use, and be resistant to diseases and insects common to the site location.

Page 39: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

342-2

NRCS, WI 1/13

Selected species will have the capacity to achieve adequate density and vigor to stabilize the site within an appropriate period.

Native herbaceous or woody vegetation selected for planting shall be suitable for the site.

Species identified as restricted or prohibited by law shall not be planted.

Certified Seed shall be used, and seeding rates will be based on Pure Live Seed (PLS). Seed tag information such as purity and germination and any computations to adjust seeding rates must be submitted to document actual seeding rates. Actual adjusted seeding rates will be based on the equivalent of 100 percent PLS, determined by multiplying the percent purity by total percent germination.

Untested introduced and native grass and forb seed are not approved for planting.

When certified seed is unavailable or difficult to locate, non-certified seed can be used, after testing for varietal purity, germination, and other mechanical qualities, such as inert matter and other crop or weed seeds.

If more than 20 percent of legume seed is hard seed, increase the seeding rate for legumes by the percentage of hard seed.

Introduced and native legume seed shall be inoculated immediately prior to planting. Rhizobia inoculant shall be specific to the legume seeded. When more than one legume specie is used, each specie will be inoculated separately.

3. Seeding Periods

The specific date that provides the best chance for success will vary from south to north and from year to year with prevailing moisture and temperature conditions. Late summer seeding is generally riskier than spring seeding. Planting at either end of the allowable range is riskier than the middle of the range. Refer to Figure 1 for planting zones and Tables 1 and 2 for seeding dates.

Seeding outside of the recommended dates must be approved by the Area Resource Conservationist or State Agronomist.

Frost seeding is not an authorized seeding method when using this standard.

Dormant seeding can be used when planting introduced species. When using dormant seedings in concentrated flow areas, the site must be mulched according to the engineering design (if applicable) and Wisconsin NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV, (WI FOTG) Conservation Practice Standard 484, Mulching.

4. Nutrient and Soil Amendment Requirements

When seeding introduced species, soil fertility and pH level will be amended to satisfy the needs of the plant species to be established. Fertilizer and lime recommendations will be determined by a soil test, and all nutrients will be applied following WI FOTG Standard 590, Nutrient Management. If no soil test is available, apply a minimum of 150 pounds of 20-10-10 fertilizer and 2 tons of 80-89 lime or equivalent per acre. Soil amendments may be waived at the discretion of a certified conservation planner. The basis for waiving the use of soil amendments shall be documented in the client’s case file.

For establishment of native species, use of soil amendments are not required.

5. Seedbed Preparation

Prior to planting into cropland fields, verify that herbicides previously applied to the site will not “carry over” and damage the new seeding.

Site preparation shall be adequate to assure weed suppression and to promote germination and growth of the species planted.

Planting equipment type, use, and timing shall be appropriate for the site conditions, soil characteristics, and type of seeds (size, etc.) selected to assure uniform placement and germination.

Page 40: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

342-3

NRCS, WI 1/13

Refer to Wisconsin Agronomy Technical Notes 5 and 6 for detailed guidance for specific situations.

6. Mulching, Temporary Cover, and Companion Crop

Mulching, temporary cover, and companion crops are vital practices utilized to support the establishment of a critical area planting. Temporary cover and companion crops suppress weed growth and limit soil erosion during the establishment period. Use depends on the site conditions, method of planting, and seed mixture.

For further details on mulching, temporary cover and companion crop recommendations, refer to Wisconsin Agronomy Technical Notes 5 and 6.

B. Criteria for Seed Mixture Development

Seeding rates are based on seeds per square foot of Pure Live Seeds. Refer to Tables 3 and 4 for common species and seeding rates.

Additional approved species for critical area planting can be found in Wisconsin Agronomy Technical Notes 5 and 6. Species not listed in the technical notes must be approved in advance by the State Agronomist.

a. Introduced Grass and Legume Plantings on Critical Sites

Custom and standard mixtures will comprise of at least 50 percent grass seed, consisting of at least 25 percent sod forming grass seed per square foot.

A minimum of 160 seeds per square foot is required for either a solid stand of grasses or a combination of grasses and legumes. Increase seeding rate by 15 percent when dormant seeding occurs.

Standard mixes listed in Table 5 will meet the minimum seed mixture criteria.

b. Native Herbaceous Plantings on Critical Sites

Native species are generally not recommended for critical area plantings due to their slow establishment and because they are clump grasses, not the preferred sod-

forming grasses. Native plantings are not permitted in concentrated flow channels.

1) A minimum of 60 seeds per square foot for solid native grass plantings is required.

2) For native grass and forb/legume mixtures, a minimum of 40 seeds per square foot of grass and a minimum of 20 seeds per square foot for the forb/legume component is required. The minimum of 20 forb/legume seeds per square foot is not required when the solid stand native grass mixture comprise of 60 grass seeds per square foot is utilized.

Canada/Virginia wildrye and sideoats grama shall not exceed a maximum of 20 percent of the required grass seeds per square foot in custom seed mixtures.

C. Additional Criteria to Stabilize Stream Channel Banks and Shorelines

Wisconsin FOTG Standard 580, Streambank and Shoreline Protection, shall be used to stabilize the toe and/or bank hydrologic zones before vegetation establishment.

1. Bank and Channel Slopes

Identify, mark, and protect desirable existing vegetation during practice installation.

On sites with a disturbed soil profile, topsoil will be stockpiled and spread over areas to be planted as needed to meet planting and land shaping needs.

Channel side slopes shall be shaped to a stable slope to facilitate establishment and maintenance of desired vegetation.

Slopes steeper than 2H:1V shall not be stabilized using vegetation alone. A combination of vegetative and structural measures will be used on these slopes to ensure adequate stability.

Grazing shall be permanently excluded on high hazard sites, such as cut banks, areas of seepage or other potentially unstable areas.

2. Species Selection

Plant material used for this purpose shall:

Page 41: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

342-4

NRCS, WI 1/13

• be adapted to the hydrologic zone into which they will be planted.

• be adapted and proven in the regions in which they will be used.

• when mature, produce plant communities that are compatible with those already existing in the area.

• protect the channel banks but not restrict channel capacity.

D. Additional Criteria to Stabilize Areas of Erosion By Wind and Water

1. The amount of plant biomass and cover needed to reduce wind and water erosion to the planned soil loss objective shall be determined using the current approved wind and/or water erosion prediction technology.

2. Do not use tillage where desirable vegetation is already present or where soil disturbance will increase the potential for erosion or cause sedimentation to environmentally sensitive areas.

3. Use a companion crop as added protection.

E. Additional Criteria to Rehabilitate and Revegetate Degraded Sites That Cannot Be Stabilized Using Normal Establishment Techniques

Slope Stabilization

1. On sites that are too steep for regular seeding equipment to operate, the use of hydroseeding and mechanically blown

mulch is recommended. For more information regarding hyrdoseeding, refer to Wisconsin Agronomy Technical Note 6.

2. Grade to a stable slope when shaping and eliminate all overfalls. For slopes steeper than 2H:1V, enhanced stabilization activities such as soil bioengineering may be required. These practice concepts shall follow approved design procedures located in the NRCS Engineering Field Handbook, Chapter 18.

3. The toe of the slope, or the outlet of the concentrated flow channel, shall be stable before attempting seeding on the slope.

4. Concentrated flow may need to be diverted from the critical area during the establishment period.

5. All gullies and deep rills will be filled and leveled during seedbed preparation.

6. A minimum of 4 inches of friable soil material or topsoil shall be added and mixed to exposed rocky, sandy, gravelly, shaley material, or extremely fine textured subsoil.

7. Sod placement shall be limited to areas that can naturally supply needed moisture or sites that can be irrigated during the establishment period.

8. Sod will be placed and anchored using techniques to ensure that it remains in place until established.

Page 42: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

342-5

NRCS, WI 1/13

Figure 1 Planting Zones

Jackson

Portage WaupacaOutagamie Brown

Door

WoodPepin

Buffalo

Trem

peal

eau

MonroeLaCrosse

Vernon

Grant

Richland

Cra wford

Iowa

Sauk

Da ne

Lafayette Green Roc k Walworth Racine

Kenosha

Juneau

Adams

Manitowoc

Kewaunee

Ca lumet

Fond du Lac

Milwaukee

Ozaukee

Sheboy ga n

Jefferson Waukesha

Winnebago

Columbia Dodge

Marquet te

Waushara

Florence

ForestMarinette

OcontoM enominee

Langlade

Shawano

Douglas Bayfield

IronAshland

Vilas

Linc oln

Oneida

MarathonDunn

Taylor

Price

Sawye r

Rusk

WashburnBurnet t

Polk Barron

St. Croi x Chippewa

Pierce Eau Claire

Clark

ingtonWash-

GreenLake

North

Central

South

Table 1

Seeding Date/Ranges for Native Mixtures and Companion Crops

Zone Spring Seeding

Northern Thaw - 7/15

Central Thaw - 6/30

Southern Thaw - 6/30

Table 2 Seeding Date/Ranges for Introduced Grasses,

Legumes, and Companion Crops

Planting Zone Spring Late

Summer Dormant

North 5/1 - 6/15 7/15 - 8/10 11/1 - Freeze up

Central 4/15 - 6/1 8/1 - 8/21 11/1 - Freeze up

South 4/1 - 5/15 8/7 - 8/29 11/1 - Freeze up

Page 43: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

342-6

NRCS, WI 1/13

VI. Considerations

Additional recommendations relating to design that may enhance the use of, or avoid problems with, this practice but are not required to ensure its basic conservation functions are as follows.

A. Minimize activities which disturb wildlife during the primary nesting season May 15 through August 1.

B. Consider seeding at a lower rate and making 2 passes to ensure uniform coverage. Check seed boxes regularly to ensure even distribution.

C. Heavy traffic and/or compacted soil areas may need special site preparation prior to seeding.

D. Sprigs, root stocks, crowns, cones, culms, and sod may be considered where appropriate to accelerate the establishment of cover.

E. Woody shrubs or trees may be used only after initial stabilization. Plant in accordance with the purpose of the planting. See WI FOTG Standards 612, Tree/Shrub Planting; and 580, Streambank and Shoreland Protection. Also see NRCS Engineering Field Handbook, Chapter 16, Streambank and Shoreline Protection and Chapter 18, Soil Bioengineering for Upland Slope Protection.

F. Consider using carriers such as vermiculite, sawdust, and soybean meal to increase volume and weight for uniform seed distribution.

G. Consider limited or no use of herbicides one year prior to seeding. If herbicides must be used, ensure there is no potential for carryover and follow label recommendations. Follow WI FOTG Standard 595, Integrated Pest Management, for pesticide use and safety.

H. Consider sodding to establish vegetation on steep slopes. For further details on this special erosion control measure, refer to Wisconsin Agronomy Technical Note 6.

I. Consider establishing a buffer of trees and/or grasses next to intermittent or perennial streams.

J. Consider planting native vegetation and/or local genotypes when restoring riparian corridors to its pre-settlement conditions.

K. High seed counts per square foot much above the recommended minimums may lead to excessive

competition and poor establishment of some species. Seeds per square foot should not exceed 25 percent of the minimum requirement, with the exception of mixtures designed for wet mesic and wet sites.

L. Consider the use of soil bioengineering techniques to arrest and prevent slope failures and erosion. For approved design procedures, refer to Chapter 18 of the NRCS Engineering Field Handbook (EFH).

M. Consider alternatives to reduce or eliminate the delivery of sediment and associated pollutants into the riparian zone by implementing upland treatment practices.

VIl. Plans and Specifications

Prepare plans and specifications for each field or management unit according to the Criteria and Operation and Maintenance sections of this standard. Specifications shall describe the requirements for applying this practice to meet the intended purpose using the appropriate specification and/or job sheets. The following elements shall be addressed in the plan, as applicable, to meet the intended purpose.

• Site preparation. • Fertilizer application. • Methods of seeding/planting. • Selection of species. • Analysis of seed quality. • Seeding rate (adjusted based on pure live seed

calculations). • Target number of plants per square foot after

emergence. • Mulching (if applicable). • Temporary cover (if applicable). • Companion crop (if applicable). • Weed control activities during the establishment

period.

Specifications shall be recorded using Wisconsin Job Sheets 134, How to Establish and Maintain Introduced Grasses and Legumes; and 135, How to Establish and Maintain Native Grasses, Forbs, and Legumes.

VlIl. Operation and Maintenance

A. Noxious weeds and other undesirable species must be controlled at all sites. During the first year, mow plantings at 14 to 21-day intervals or when weeds are 12-14 inches high and before the development of mature seed. Mowing height

Page 44: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

342-7

NRCS, WI 1/13

should be 4 inches for introduced and 7 inches for native plants. Small grain companion crops should be mowed at boot stage and prior to heading. Spot spraying or hand pulling may be needed for some invasive species such as thistles and purple loosestrife.

B. Sites may require on-going periodic maintenance consisting of mowing, burning, or herbicide treatment.

C. Sites should be inspected periodically to ensure site stabilization objectives are being met.

IX. References

Curtis, J. T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.

Henderson, R. A. 1995. Plant Species Composition of Wisconsin Prairies: An Aid to Selecting Species for Plantings and Restorations Based Upon University of Wisconsin-Madison Plant Ecology Laboratory Data. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Technical Bulletin No. 188.

Ladd, D. and Oberle, F. 1995. Tallgrass Prairie Wildflowers, A Field Guide. The Nature Conservancy.

Nichols, S. and Entine, L. 1976. Prairie Primer. University of Wisconsin - Extension, publication G2736.

Packard, S. and Mutel, C. 1997. The Tallgrass Restoration Handbook for Prairies, Savannas and Woodlands. Society for Ecological Restoration.

Rock, H. W. 1971. Prairie Propagation Handbook. Boerner Botanical Gardens.

USDA, NRCS, National Engineering Handbook, Part 650, Engineering Field Handbook.

USDA, NRCS, Wisconsin Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG), Section IV, Practice Standards and Specifications.

USDA, NRCS, Wisconsin Agronomy Technical Note 5, Establishing and Maintaining Native Grasses, Forbs, and Legumes.

USDA, NRCS, Wisconsin Agronomy Technical Note 6, Establishing and Maintaining Introduced Grasses and Legumes.

USDA, NRCS, Wisconsin Job Sheet 134, How to Establish and Maintain Introduced Grasses and Legumes.

USDA, NRCS, Wisconsin Job Sheet 135, How to Establish and Maintain Native Grasses, Forbs, and Legumes.

X. Definitions

Actual Adjusted Seeding Rates (V.A.2.) – an increase in seeds per square foot or pounds per acre, when the PLS is less than 100 percent.

Aspect (V.A.1.) – The exposure of the site to direct sunlight, prevailing winds, and other factors that influence plant growing conditions. For example, a north slope tends to be cooler and moister while a south-facing slope tends to be drier and warmer.

Soil Bioengineering (VI.L.) – Practice of combining mechanical, biological, and ecological concepts to arrest and prevent shallow slope failures and erosion.

Certified Seed (V.A.2.) – Seed that meets the standards established by the designated official seed certifying agency for the purpose of ensuring species/variety, species/varietal purity and mechanical quality. The Wisconsin Crop Improvement Association is the official seed certifying agency for Wisconsin.

Genotype (VI.J.) – A group of individual plants which share a specified genetic makeup. For example, all big bluestem plants that are genetically adapted to grow and mature in the climatic conditions found in the driftless region could be considered a genotype.

Introduced Species (V.A.4.) – Plant species that historically were not native to North America and were brought here from other parts of the world, for example, smooth bromegrass and alfalfa.

Native Species (V.A.4.) – Plants species that historically would have been found growing in North America such as big bluestem or green needle-grass.

Non-Certified Seed (V.A.2.) – Seed that is grown, processed, tested and labeled for species/variety and mechanical quality factors, but is not certified by an official seed certifying agency.

Pure Live Seed (PLS) (V.A.2.) – PLS is a means of expressing seed quality, based on the percentage of seed in a seed lot that is both pure and viable. PLS is calculated by multiplying the percentage of total viable seed (germination + hard seed + dormant seed) by the percentage of pure seed divided by 100.

Untested Seed (V.A.2.) – Seed that has no assurances of testing for species/variety and mechanical quality, i.e., species/variety purity, inert matter, other crop or weed seeds and germination potential. Untested seed legally cannot be labeled.

Page 45: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

342-8

NRCS, WI 1/13

Table 3 Common Species and Seeding Rates for Critical Area Plantings

Common Name Scientific Name Moisture Regime

Single Species Seeding Rate

(PLS) Lbs./Ac.

Seeds/Lb. Seeds/Square Ft./Lb./Ac.

Native Grasses Big Bluestem1 Andropogon gerardii1 D, DM, M, WM 11 165,000 3.8 Canada Wild Rye Elymus canadensis DM, M, WM 12 83,200 1.9 Indian Grass1 Sorghastrum nutans1 D, DM, M, WM, W 10 192,000 4.4 Little Bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium D, DM, M 8 240,000 5.5 Prairie June Grass Koeleria macrantha1, 2 D, DM, M 0.5 2,308,672 53 Sideoats Grama Bouteloua curtipendula D, DM, M 8 127,000 2.9 Switch Grass1 Panicum virgatum1 D, DM, M, WM, W 7 389,000 8.9 Virginia Wild Rye Elymus virginicus M, WM, W 17 67,200 1.5 Introduced Grasses

Chewings Red Fescue2 Festuca rubra L. ssp. fallax2 D, DM, M 5 350,000 8

Creeping Red Fescue1, 2 Festuca rubra1, 2 DM, M, WM 5 350,000 8 Festulolium Festuca x Lolium DM, M, WM 10 227,000 5.2

Italian or Annual Ryegrass Lolium perenne L. ssp. multiflorum DM, M, WM 20 227,000 5.2

Kentucky Bluegrass1, 2 Poa pratensis1, 2 D, DM, M, WM, W 8 2,177,000 50 Orchard Grass Dactylis glomerata L. D, DM, M, WM 10 653,000 15 Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne DM, M, WM 20 227,000 5.2 Redtop1, 2 Agrostis gigantea2 M, WM, W 4 4,990,000 114.5 Smooth Bromegrass1, 2 Bromus inermis1, 2 D, DM, M, WM 20 136,000 3.1 Tall Fescue Schedonorus arundinaceus D, DM, M, WM 12 227,000 5.2 Timothy Phleum pratense DM, M, WM, W 8 1,230,000 28.2 Legumes Alfalfa Medicago sativa D, DM, M 12 219,000 5.0 Alsike Clover Trifolium hybridum M, WM, W 3 680,000 15.6 Birdsfoot trefoil Lotus corniculatus DM, M, WM, W 7 375,000 8.6 Red Clover Trifolium pratense DM, M, WM 10 275,000 6.3 White Ladino Clover Trifolium repens DM, M, WM 3 871,650 20

1 Species approved for seeding individually at the recommended Pure Stand Rates based on Pure Live Seeds (PLS) depending on the erosiveness of the site.

It is required that at least 50% of the seeds per square foot of mixtures planted to introduced and native species on critical areas are composed of grasses, and 25% of the seeds per square foot are sod-forming grasses for introduced species.

If more than 20% of the legume seed is hard seed, increase the seeding rate for legumes by the percent of hard seed.

Seeds per square foot for a particular specie can be calculated by multiplying the number of seeds per pound of the specie by the rate of the specie in pound(s) per acre divided by 43,560 square feet.

2 Sod-forming grass plants.

Page 46: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

342-9

NRCS, WI 1/13

Table 4 Seeding Chart for Native Grass Species

Common Name Scientific Name Percent of Mixture

Pure Stand Seeding Rate

Seeds per Square Foot

Big Bluestem Andropogon gerardii 0-100 11 lbs/ac 42 Canada Wildrye Elymus canadensis 0-20 12 lbs/ac 23 Indian grass Sorghastrum nutans 0-100 10 lbs/ac 44 Little Bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium 0-20 8 lbs./ac 44 Sideoats Grama Bouteloua curtipendula 0-20 8 lbs/ac 23 Switchgrass Panicum virgatum 0-100 7 lbs/ac 63 Virginia Wild Rye Elymus virginicus 0-20 17 lbs/ac 26 Praire June Grass Koeleria macrantha 0-20 0.5 lbs/ac 26 Hairy Grama Bouteloua hirsuta 0-25 1 lb/ac 26

Canada Wild Rye, Virginia Wild Rye and Sideoats Grama when combined will not comprise of more than 20% of the total grass seeds per square foot. Pure stand seeding rates for Big Bluestem and Indiangrass must be increased by 5 lbs/acre to meet the minimum seeds per square foot as required by this standard. Refer to Table 3 for suggested moisture regimes per specie.

Page 47: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

342-10

NRCS, WI 1/13

Table 5 Seeding Mixtures Suitable for Critical Area Plantings

Seed Calculator

Code*

Moisture Regimes Common Name Scientific Name

Seeding Rate in

lb/ac PLS

Seeding Rate in Seeds/Ft2

PLS

Capacity Retardance

Type of Site**

342-1 Dry-Mesic and Mesic Sites

Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 10 31

B EB, WW,CSB

Creeping Red Fescue Festuca rubra 3 24 Alfalfa Medicago sativa 3 15 Red Clover Trifolium pratense 3 19 Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis 1.5 75

342-2 Dry-Mesic and Mesic Sites***

Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 15 47 B EB,WW Alfalfa Medicago sativa 7 35

Timothy Phleum pratense 3 85

342-3 Dry-Mesic and Mesic Sites

Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis 1 50

B CSB, EB, WW

Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 10 31 Timothy Phleum pratense 2 56 Tall Fescue Schedonorus arundinacea 2 10 Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne 5 26

342-4 Dry-Mesic and Mesic Sites

Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 20 62

B EB, WW, CSB

Creeping Red Fescue Festuca rubra 5 40 Alfalfa Medicago sativa 8 40 Red Clover Trifolium pratense 4 25

342-5 Dry-Mesic and Mesic Sites

Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 30 93 B EB, WW,

CSB Alfalfa Medicago sativa 14 70

342-6

Dry-Mesic, Mesic, and Wet Mesic Sites

Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 7 22

B CSB, EB, WW

Timothy Phleum pratense 2 56 Creeping Red Fescue Festuca rubra 1 8 Kentucky Bluegrass Poa pratensis 1 50 Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne 3 16 Red Clover Trifolium pratense 3 19

342-7 Mesic Sites***

Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 7 22

B EB, WW Creeping Red Fescue Festuca rubra 2 16 Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis 3 150 Birdsfoot trefoil Lotus corniculatus 2 17

342-8 Mesic Sites***

Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 15 47 B WW,EB Creeping Red Fescue Festuca rubra 2 16

Kentucky Bluegrass Poa pratensis 2 100

342-9 Mesic Sites***

Kentucky Bluegrass Poa pratensis 3 150 C WW,EB Creeping Red Fescue Festuca rubra 4 32

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne 10 52

342-10 Mesic Sites

Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 14 43

B EB, WW, CSB

Timothy Phleum pratense 3 85 Red Clover Trifolium pratense 3 19 Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne 4 21

342-11 Mesic Sites Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 32 99

B EB, WW Creeping Red Fescue Festuca rubra 8 64

342-12 Mesic Sites Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis 4 200

C EB, WW Creeping Red Fescue Festuca rubra 3 24

Page 48: Request for Proposal (RFP) · 7/17/2015  · The proposal shall be prepared with a straightforward, concise delineation of the vendor’s capabilities to satisfy the requirements

342-11

NRCS, WI 1/13

Seed Calculator

Code*

Moisture Regimes Common Name Scientific Name

Seeding Rate in

lb/ac PLS

Seeding Rate in Seeds/Ft2

PLS

Capacity Retardance

Type of Site**

342-13 Mesic Sites Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 14 43

B EB, WW, CSB Timothy Phleum pratense 4 113

Red Clover Trifolium pratense 3 19

342-14 Mesic Sites Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 15 47

B EB, WW, CSB Timothy Phleum pratense 3.5 99

Alsike Clover Trifolium hybridum 2 32

342-15 Mesic Sites Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 15 47

B EB, WW Timothy Phleum pratense 3.5 99 Birdsfoot trefoil Lotus corniculatus 3 26

342-16 Wet Mesic Sites

Tall Fescue Schedonorus arundinacea 5 26

B CSB, EB, WW

Timothy Phleum pratense 3 85 Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne 3 16 Red Clover Trifolium pratense 3 19 Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 6 19 Kentucky Bluegrass Poa pratensis 2 100

342-17 Wet Mesic Sites

Redtop Agrostis gigantea 1 115 C WW,

CSB, EB Timothy Phleum pratense 3 85 Red Clover Trifolium pratense 5 32

342-18 Wet Mesic Sites

Timothy Phleum pratense 3 85

B WW, CSB, EB

Perennial Ryegrass Lolium perenne 3 16 Red Clover Trifolium pratense 3 19 Smooth Bromegrass Bromus inermis 6 19 Kentucky Bluegrass Poa pratensis 2 100

342-19 Wet Mesic Sites

Redtop Agrostis gigantea 1 115

C WW,CSB,EB

Timothy Phleum pratense 1 28 Red Clover Trifolium pratense 4 25 Kentucky Bluegrass Poa pratensis 2 100

342-20 Wet Sites*** Redtop Agrostis gigantea 2 229

C WW Alsike Clover Trifolium hybridum 2 31 Kentucky Bluegrass Poa pratensis 2 100

342-21 Wet Mesic Sites

Redtop Agrostis gigantea 3 344 C WW

Alsike Clover Trifolium hybridum 3 47 *These codes represent the mixtures used in the Wisconsin Seed Calculator. **EB = Embankments; WW = Waterways; CSB = Channel and Streambanks ***Mixtures can be used on other site descriptions when not listed.