Reputation as (dis)incentive

38
Reputation as incentive Heather Piwowar @researchremix DataONE postdoc with NESCent and Dryad #sameAs on Reputation, May 2011

description

Heather Piwowar at #sameAs on Reputation in a London Pub, May 2011

Transcript of Reputation as (dis)incentive

Page 1: Reputation as (dis)incentive

Reputationas incentive

Heather  Piwowar  @researchremix  DataONE  postdoc  with  NESCent  and  Dryad

#sameAs  on  Reputation,  May  2011  

Page 2: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/ho/09/euwf/ho_24.45.1.htm

Page 3: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jsmjr/62443357/

Page 4: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/camilleharrington/3587294608/

Page 5: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rkuhnau/3318245976/

Page 6: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/conformpdx/1796399674/

Page 7: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rkuhnau/3317418699/

Page 8: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/zemlinki/261617721/

Page 9: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tracenmatt/3020786491/

Page 10: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/the-o/2078239333/

Page 12: Reputation as (dis)incentive

Note:log scale

Page 13: Reputation as (dis)incentive

~70%

Page 15: Reputation as (dis)incentive

Reputationas incentive

Page 16: Reputation as (dis)incentive

Reputationas incentive

Page 17: Reputation as (dis)incentive

Reputationas disincentive

Page 24: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/samrich2003/175520596/

Page 25: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/nuttinbutlove/2954520460/

Page 26: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kellyloveswhales/4009156878/

Page 28: Reputation as (dis)incentive

Reputation

Page 29: Reputation as (dis)incentive

Standard practice

Page 30: Reputation as (dis)incentive

“An inherent principle of publication is that others should be able to replicate and build upon the authors' published claims. Therefore, a condition of publication in a Nature journal is that authors are required to make materials, data and associated protocols available in a publicly accessible database …”

http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/availability.html

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7197/index.html

journal  data  sharing  policy

Page 31: Reputation as (dis)incentive

High-impact journals

tend to have

a strong data-sharing

policy

Piwowar ELPUB 2008

Page 32: Reputation as (dis)incentive

Articles published in journals with a strong data-sharing policy are more likely to have publicly

available datasets

Piwowar ELPUB 2008

Page 33: Reputation as (dis)incentive

Odds Ratio0.25 0.50 1.00 2.00 4.00 8.00

Has journal policy

Count of R01 & other NIH grants

Authors prev GEOAE sharing & OA & microarray creation

NOT K funding or P funding

Journal impact

Institution high citations & collaboration

Journal policy consequences & long halflife

Instititution is government & NOT higher ed

NOT institution NCI or intramural

NOT animals or mice

Last author num prev pubs & first year pub

Large NIH grant

First author num prev pubs & first year pub

Humans & cancer

NOT geo reuse & YES high institution output

Piwowar, PLoS ONE 2011 (soon), Who shares? Who doesn’t?

Page 35: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/youraddresshere/6649228/

Page 36: Reputation as (dis)incentive

http://www.flickr.com/photos/huzzahvintage/4577075021/

Page 37: Reputation as (dis)incentive

thank youTodd Vision,

Michael Whitlock,Wendy Chapman, DataONE and Dryad teams

The open science online community and those who release their articles, datasets and photos openly

Page 38: Reputation as (dis)incentive