Reporting IG gene sequence data in clinical diagnostics
Transcript of Reporting IG gene sequence data in clinical diagnostics
Workshop on immunoglobulin gene analysis in chronic
lymphocytic leukemia
Bethesda, USA, March 29th 2019
Reporting IG gene sequence data in clinical
diagnostics
Lesley Ann Sutton
Clinical genetics, Molecular medicine & surgery (MMK),
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Basic details Recommendations
Patient data Name Gender
Date of birth ID number
Tissue type/Molecule type Peripheral blood
Bone marrow
Sample arrival date -
Requesting physician -
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Parameter Recommendations
- Methodology
- Gene identification
- Productive rearrangement
- IGHV gene: % nucleotide identity to germline
- Subset identification
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Methodology
• gDNA or cDNA
• PCR primers - Leader, Biomed (FR1)
• PCR product analysis/clonality assessment
- PAGE, GeneScan, Heteroduplex
• Sequencing strategy - direct Sanger, subcloning, NGS
• Bioinformatic tools - IMGT, Arrest/AssignSubsets
Technical details: an essential requirement for
all clinical genetic tests
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Usable sequences = productive rearrangements
They do not involve pseudogenes
They do not carry stop codons
They are in-frame
SHM IG gene analysis: only prognostic for productive rearrangements
Unproductive rearrangements can be included on the report: mention the reason for being unproductive (OF, stop codon etc.)
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Gene identification - parameters to consider
Genes – State the IGHV, IGHD and IGHJ gene and allele
VH CDR3 – check that the IG VDJ junction is in-frame with no stop codons
Check if the VH CDR3 anchors are present (C-104 & W-118)
SHM - Percentage of identity of the IGHV gene and allelic
ratio of aligned nucleotides
Stereotypy - Check if the rearranged sequence belongs to a stereotyped subset (#1, #2, #4 or #8)
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Gene identification - parameters to consider
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
IGHD gene assignment is not always possible
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Percentage identity to the germline
• The % identity should always be reported, not only mutated/unmutated. Classification:
M-CLL < 98%; U-CLL ≥ 98%
• Borderline when IG gene mutational status is between 97-97,9%
• Counted from IMGT codon 1 to 104
• Automatically given by IMGT/V‐QUEST.
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
BCR stereotypy - first step IMGT
*Subset #1 - IGHV1/5/7 - 13 AA VH CDR3
*Subset #2 – IGHV3-21 - 9 AA VH CDR3
*Subset #4 - IGHV4-34 - 20 AA VH CDR3
*Subset #8 – IGHV4-39 – 18 AA VH CDR3
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
BCR stereotypy - second step Arrest/AssignSubset
http://www.ericll.org/guidance-toolsig/
http://www.ericll.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Technical-Report-Guidelines.pdf
ERIC Guidance tools
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Cases difficult to categorize
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
• The vast majority of cases will be categorized into M-CLL or U-CLL
But!!! A small fraction will be difficult to categorize
Cases difficult to categorize – Multiple rearrangements
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
• 2% of 4154 cases carried double productive rearrangements (Langerak et al,
Leukemia 2011).
• More frequent when using gDNA.
• Usually only one rearrangement transcribed, however:
– Allelic exclusion or ’allelic inclusion’ has been described.
– Biclonality may occur rarely.
Cases difficult to categorize – Multiple rearrangements
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Double rearrangements: 435/4154 10.5%
•cDNA 61/1628
•gDNA 374/2526
Productive + unproductive: 350/435 80%
Double productive: 85/435 20%
Langerak et al, Leukemia 2011
Cases difficult to categorize – Multiple rearrangements
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Langerak et al, Leukemia 2011
Productive + unproductive 350/435 80%
Similar mutational status 326/350 93%
UM productive + M unproductive 17/350 5%
M productive + UM unproductive 7/350 2%
Cases difficult to categorize – Multiple rearrangements
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Langerak et al, Leukemia 2011
•
Double productive 85/435 20%
•Similar mutational status 56/85 66%
Discordant mutational status 29/85 34% (0.7% of total)
•
• Same mutation status
- Both productive
- one productive and one unproductive
Cases difficult to categorize – Multiple rearrangements
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Clinical interpretation is straightforward!
•
Cases difficult to categorize – Multiple rearrangements
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Divergent mutation status
Productive mutated IGH rearrangement & unproductive
unmutated IGH rearrangement
Interpreted and reported as mutated
•
Cases difficult to categorize – Multiple rearrangements
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Divergent mutation status
Productive unmutated IGH rearrangement & productive mutated
IGH rearrangement
Interpretation unknown
Due to the amplification of two productive rearrangements which exhibit discordant IGHV
mutational status, it is not possible to give a prognostically relevant interpretation
•
Cases difficult to categorize – Multiple rearrangements
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
Divergent mutation status
Productive unmutated IGH rearrangement & unproductive
mutated IGH rearrangement
Interpretation unknown
•
Cases difficult to categorize – Single unproductive
rearrangements
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
gDNA and cDNA:
1. Repeat the analysis.
2. Use an alternative set of primers.
3. If gDNA has been used, amplify instead using cDNA.
4. Repeat with a new sample.
In most cases a productive rearrangment should be possible to amplify
If still only one unproductive rearrangement detected - no clinical association can be made
http://www.ericll.org/guidance-toolsig/
http://www.ericll.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Technical-Report-Guidelines.pdf
ERIC Guidance tools
Reporting IGHV gene somatic hypermutation in CLL
ERIC supporters!
Thank you!