Reporting and qa blr 2016 v2
-
Upload
teleradiology-solutions -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
47 -
download
0
Transcript of Reporting and qa blr 2016 v2
Reporting Standards & Quality Assurance
1. You cannot standardize descriptions of individual humans.
2. I’m not a robot.
3. I’m a professional who expresses himself.
4. Not all cases fit a mold.
5. I use standard language already.
Barriers to implementation
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in a rather scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more or less.”
Reporting Standards & Quality Assurance
1. You can’t assure quality.
2. It’s a never-ending process.
Barriers to implementation
Reporting Standards
Quality Assurance
IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE
IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY
exophytic, enhancing mass likely
Where in the study?
Image/series number?…image 43/189 of the cor recons….”
Size mattersUnitsCaliper placementDimensions Appropriate terms
LesionStructureCystTumorPhlegmonProcessInfiltrateGoober
Certainty
Adapted from: The radiology report: A guide to thoughtful communication for radiologists and other medical professionals 2015, Curtis P Langlotz MD PhD
“On the post-contrast images, a 1-cm is present in the anterior upper pole of the left kidney.”
Accurate anatomy
Descriptors
vs.
Action!
What’s normal?
UnremarkableEssentially/relatively/fairly normalNo radiologic evidence of diseaseWithin normal limitsNo significant abnormalityAge-appropriateNegative for trauma
I see nothing wrong in the foot.
Adapted from: The radiology report: A guide to thoughtful communication for radiologists and other medical professionals 2015, Curtis P Langlotz MD PhD
OR
The foot is normal.
How would you report this?
What’s normal?
Acad Radiol. 2003 Jun;10(6):685-8. Khorasani R1, Bates DW, Teeger S, Rothschild JM, Adams DF, Seltzer SE.
What’s certainty?
?
Severity
Adapted from: The radiology report: A guide to thoughtful communication for radiologists and other medical professionals 2015, Curtis P Langlotz MD PhD
Kijowski R1, Blankenbaker D, Stanton P, Fine J, De Smet A. Arthroscopic validation of radiographic grading scales of osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Sep;187(3):794-9
Mild/mod/severely limited by respiratory motionExam is limited by nonstandard positioningNormal given small lung volumesPulsation/beam hardeningEctopic disclaimerSubtle stroke disclaimer
Disclaimers
The organ recital – “Yes, I looked.”
“Yes, I am thinking.”
What clinicians want to see: “No ICH, shift, or mass effect”
Billing/coding purposes
Pertinent negatives
C spine for radicular pain
C spine for trauma
Chest radiograph
PE chest CT
C7-T1 Moderate posterior disk bulge
BodyImpression
Body ? ?Body
C7-T1 Minimal posterior disk bulge
Body No No No
Acute C7 fracture
BodyImpression
BodyImpression
BodyImpression
BodyImpression
Cardiomegaly NA NA BodyImpression
Body+/- impression
Aortic calfication No No Body Body
Find
ing
ExamRelevance
Sistrom CL, et al. Recommendations for additional imaging in radiology reports: multifactorial analysis of 5.9 million examinations. Radiology. 2009 Nov;253(2):453-61 Grieve FM, Plumb AA, Khan SH. Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective. Br J Radiol. 2010 Jan;83(985):17-22.
The majority of PCPs want radiologists’ recommendations.
12% of radiology reports recommend follow-up imaging.
Recommendations
Reporting Standards & Quality Assurance
Remove the noise!Reporting Standards & Quality Assurance
Recommend clinical correlation.Recommend follow-up.Too small to characterize…. NOT an adjective.
ProminentMarkedlyBilaterallyIrregular Significant
For the clinician:
Consistent & clear Logical format and organizationStandard terminology
Benefits of standardization
Benefits of standardization
For the radiologist:
ChecklistMemory aid for various diagnoses e.g., splenic v. patency in pancreatitis
Computer searchable for research, QANational Radiology Data RegistryACR appropriateness criteriaConsistent PACS taggingRadiologic decision support tools
Benefits of standardization
For the patient:
Critical value communication (JCHAO)Medical society guidelines (ACR, ACOG, ASTS, AOA)Physician Quality Reporting System compliance (CMS)
We can’t:
Set the technical parametersPrevent/manage procedure complications….or technical failures at a client facilityEasily get follow-up (although we try)Get access to EHR/RIS
IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE
IDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTION * IMPORTANT SLIDE PAY ATTENTIO
We can:
Track turnaround timeTrack CV/Call return timeTrack case volume/productivityMeasure accuracy c/w peers
WHY REPORTING QUALITY IS SO IMPORTANT TO US AT TELERAD SOLUTIONS
Demonstrate gen-leading reporting