Reporting a split plot ANOVA

26
Reporting a Split-Plot ANOVA in SPSS

description

Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Transcript of Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Page 1: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Reporting a Split-Plot ANOVA in SPSS

Page 2: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Note –

Page 3: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Note – the reporting format shown in this learning module is for APA. For other formats, consult specific format guides.

Page 4: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Note – the reporting format shown in this learning module is for APA. For other formats, consult specific format guides. It is also recommended to consult the latest APA manual to compare what is described in this learning module with the most updated formats for APA.

Page 5: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

A typical example of a split-plot analysis report might be:

Page 6: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

A typical example of a split-plot analysis report might be: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

Page 7: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down:

Page 8: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

Page 9: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This is the F ratio for the 1st main effect. We compare

this value with the F critical.

If the F ratio is greater than the F critical then we

would reject the null hypothesis.

Page 10: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This is the degrees of freedom for gender

- 2 levels (female & male) - 1 = 1.

Page 11: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This is the degrees of freedom for error value.

Page 12: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This is the F ratio for the 2nd main effect

Page 13: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This is the Mean Square for the Error Value

Page 14: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This is the p value indicating that result was statistically

significant.

Page 15: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

F ratio or value for the 2nd main effect

Page 16: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

Degrees of freedom for 4

levels of time (4-1 = 3)

Page 17: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

Degrees of freedom for the error value.

Page 18: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This is the F ratio for the 2nd main effect

Page 19: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This is the Mean Square for the Error Value

Page 20: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This is the p value indicating that result of the 2nd main effect was

statistically significant.

Page 21: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

F ratio or value for the interaction effect

Page 22: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

Degrees of freedom for (2-1=1)

levels of gender TIMES (4-1=3)

EQUALS 3 time X

Page 23: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

Degrees of freedom for the error value.

Page 24: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This is the F ratio for the interaction effect

Page 25: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This is the Mean Square for the Error Value

Page 26: Reporting a split plot ANOVA

Let’s break this down: “The main effect of Gender was significant, F(1, 19) = 7.91, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01, as was the main effect of Time, F(3, 19) = 12.70, MSE = 23.20, p < 0.01. The interaction of these two factors was not significant, F(3, 19) = 2.71, MSE = 23.20, n.s.”

This means that the result is not significant.