report(1)

28
EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPTS OF IMPLANT ANCHORAGE AHMADSHAMS,NEGAR RAMEZANI FATATOUEI,MINA SAFARI SAMAN,NEDA SHERAFAT,SONIA

description

yeah

Transcript of report(1)

  • EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPTS OF IMPLANT ANCHORAGEAHMADSHAMS,NEGARRAMEZANI FATATOUEI,MINASAFARI SAMAN,NEDASHERAFAT,SONIA

  • INTRODUCTION

    IMPLANTS- are relatively inert materials (biomaterials) inserted into the soft and hard tissues of jaws, thereby providing support and retention for dental prostheses

  • OSSEOINTEGRATIONIt is a process whereby clinically asymptomatic rigid fixation of alloplastic materials is achieved and maintained in bone during functional loading It is a contact established between normal and remodeled bone and an implant surface without the interposition of non-bone or connective tissue.

  • HISTORY

    Weinmann(1956)concept of seal around dental implantsBranemark et el.(1970s)---- research on osseointegrationJames and Kelln(1974)---- investigation of seal phenomenon Reported----

    regeneration of gingival epithelium presence of hemidesmosomes oricin-positive deposition presence of connective tissues fibres Lavelle et al.(1981)----- necessity of attached gingiva to adapt to the implant Mckinney et al.(1981-85)---- regeneration of attached gingiva

  • SEAL FORMATIONThe following series of events occur:-Formation of epithelial cuff/ free gingival margin.Formation of free gingival groove and gingival sulcus.Formation of non-keratinized crevicular epithelium.Zone of epithelial cells at the base of the sulcus.

  • ROLE OF EPITHELIAL CELLS IN SEAL FORMATIONFormation of basal lamina collagenous structureSecretion of enzyme- Laminin

  • BIOLOGIC STRUCTURES FORMING BIOLOGIC SEAL Epithelial cell with cell membraneBasal lamina outside cell membrane

    Lamina LucidaLamina densaSublamina LucidaHemidesmosomes on cell membrane

    Peripheral densitiesPyramidal particlesFine filamentsLinear body

  • THE IMPLANT-BONE INTERFACEThe relationship between endosseous implants and bone consists of the following mechanisms:-Osseointegration- when the bone is in intimate but not ultra-structural contactFibrosseous integration - in which soft tissues such as fibers and/or cells, are interposed between the two surfacesBiointegration- the benign acceptance of a foreign object by living tissue

  • CELLULAR BACKGROUND

    Conditions for a proper bone response:- Presence of adequate cells Presence of adequate nutrition Presence of adequate stimulus for bone repair

  • Adequate cells :--Differentiated bone cells---

    OsteoblastsOsteoclastsOsteocytesUndifferentiated--- capable of future osteogenic activity

  • BONE HEALING

    Cell to cell contactMatrix contributionPeizoelectric signals

  • BIOLOGIC MECHANISMS FOR BONE GROWTHOSTEOCONDUCTION- formation of bone by osteoblasts from the margins of the defect on the bone graft material.

    OSTEOINDUCTION- involves new bone formation via stimulation of undifferentiated cells to differentiate into osteoblasts.

    OSTEOGENESIS- given an adequate blood supply and cellular viability transplanted osteoblasts form new centers of ossification

  • BIOMATERIALS The various biomaterials are:-1. Metals and Metal Alloys2. Ceramics and Carbons3. Polymers and Composites

  • 1. METAL ALLOYS Metallic biomaterials being used extensively are:- 1. Titanium and alloys of titanium 2. Aluminium 3. Vanadium 4. Precious metals such as gold and platinum and their alloys are less frequently used

  • 1. CERAMICS AND CARBONSThis group includes:-Aluminium oxide( alumina and sapphire)CeramicsCarbon and Carbon-silicon compounds Hydroxyapatite has been proposed as a solid material and as a surface coating.

  • 2. POLYMERS AND COMPOSITESThese include:-Cross-linked polymers such as:- Polymethyl-methacrylate, Silicone rubber Polyethylene

  • SURFACE MODIFICATIONSPASSIVATION- enhancement of the oxide layer to prevent the release of metallic ions ANODIZATION- passage of electric current through the metal.SURFACE TEXTURING- increases the area to which the bone can bond.ION IMPLANTATION- bombarding the surface of the implant with high-energy ions

  • FACTORS AFFECTING SUCCESS AND FAILURE OF IMPLANTSImplant BiocompatabilityImplant DesignImplant surfaceImplant BedSurgical TechniqueLoading Conditions

  • FACTORS

    1. IMPLANT BIOCOMPATABILITY---Most accepted- commercially pure titanium, Niobium, Tantalum.Adherent, self repairing, corrosion resistant layer

  • 2. IMPLANT DESIGN Threaded implants- long functioning without clinical problems Unthreaded

  • 3.IMPLANT SURFACE

    Smooth surfaceunacceptable bone cell adhesion Micro-irregularities Energy states/ Surface energy

  • 4. STATE OF HOST BED

    Previous irradiation Osteoporosis and Alveolar ridge height resorption Heavy smoking

  • 5. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE Technique -Violent- frictional heat Speed of drilling Power used for implant insertion

  • 6. LOADING CONDITIONS

    Premature-

    -soft tissue anchorage -poor long term function Length of time loading Gradual increase of load

  • SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DEFINITIONS All the above definitions are HISTOLOGICAL and not CLINICAL. These definitions come into play:- 1. In laboratories with experimental subjects. 2. After implant failure 3. At the time of autopsy

  • CLINICAL SUCCESS OF IMPLANTS This is when the implant is in clinical service. The success criteria of implants has been determined on the basis of:- LONGEVITY OF IMPLANTS Earlier-- ranged to about 5 years Now-- ranges to around 20 years

  • CONCLUSION If the dentist keeps these biologic activities in mind during surgical and prosthetic procedures, the bone can be expected to be maintained in a healthy state, thus assuring long term functioning for such dental implants.

  • THANK YOU ! ! !