Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather Than Traditional Cost...
-
Upload
mauriciogasparini6221 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather Than Traditional Cost...
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
1
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should
Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
2
Acknowledgement
I would like to express my deepest appreciation to all those who provided me the possibility to
complete this report. A special gratitude I give to, Ms. Tanzina Haque, Associate Professor,
University of Dhaka, whose contribution in stimulating suggestions and encouragement, helped
me to coordinate in every problem especially in writing this report.
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
3
Executive Summary
Activity-based costing provides a more accurate method of product/service costing, leading to
more accurate pricing decisions. It increases understanding of overheads and cost drivers; and
makes costly and non-value adding activities more visible, allowing managers to reduce or
eliminate them. ABC enables effective challenge of operating costs to find better ways of
allocating and eliminating overheads. It also enables improved product and customer profitability
analysis. It supports performance management techniques such as continuous improvement and
scorecards. It is because; the company should implement ABC rather than traditional costing
system.
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
4
Table of Contents Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................................ 2
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5
Objective ................................................................................................................................................... 6
Methodology of the Report ...................................................................................................................... 6
Activity Based Costing (ABC) ......................................................................................................................... 7
Benefits from ABC that management can obtain ......................................................................................... 8
Reason of using the Activity Based Costing rather than the Traditional Cost System ................................. 9
Steps to Implement ABC ............................................................................................................................. 10
Recommendation ........................................................................................................................................ 13
Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 14
References & Bibliography .......................................................................................................................... 15
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
5
Introduction
Activity Based Costing (ABC) is a system based on activities that links organizational spending
on the resources to the products and services produced and delivered to customers. This system
is more beneficial than the traditional costing system. It is because; in the Activity Based Costing
(ABC) the company can be able to get more benefits than it can get from the traditional costing
system. On the other side, in the Activity Based Costing (ABC) the company can be able to
know about the actual part of the system and how much it is required to perform in the level of
overall activity.
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
6
Objective
The objective of this report is to find out the reason of why the company should implement ABC
rather than the traditional costing system. The objective entirely is to describe about the whole
beneficial system of the ABC so that it may become so clear about its using perfectness than the
traditional costing system.
Methodology of the Report
For the fulfillment of the report, the whole theoretical discussion has been used and it is the most
perfect way to describe about the whole system of the Activity Based Costing (ABC). Besides,
the steps of the implementation of the Activity Based Costing (ABC) also has been shown so that
it may be become more clear for the perfect formulation and implementation of the Activity
Based Costing (ABC).
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
7
Activity Based Costing (ABC)
Activity based cost (ABC) is a systems that trace indirect and support expense accurately to
individual products, services and customers. An activity based costing (ABC) system recognizes
the relationship between costs, activities and products, and through this relationship assigns
indirect costs to products less arbitrarily than traditional methods.
Activity based costing (ABC) assigns manufacturing overhead costs to products in a more
logical manner than the traditional approach of simply allocating costs on the basis of machine
hours. Activity based costing first assigns costs to the activities that are the real cause of the
overhead. It then assigns the cost of those activities only to the products that are actually
demanding the activities. The activity based costing (ABC) is an approach to the costing and
monitoring of activities which involves tracing resource consumption and costing final outputs.
Resources are assigned to activities, and activities to cost objects based on consumption
estimates. The latter utilize cost drivers to attach activity costs to outputs.
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
8
Benefits from ABC that management can obtain
1. Product cost determination under activity-based costing is more accurate and
reliable because it focuses on the cause and effect linkage of costs and activities in
the context of producing goods.
2. Fixation of selling price for multi-products under activity-based costing is fair and
correct because overheads are allocated on the basis of relevant cost drivers.
3. Control of overheads consisting of fixed and variable becomes possible by
controlling and monitoring activities. Linkage between cost and activities are clearly
identified in activity-based costing and thus provides opportunities to control
overhead costs.
4. Sufficient information can be obtained to make decisions about the profitability of
different product lines.
5. Fair allocation of overheads occupies a considerable portion in the total cost
components.
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
9
Reason of using the Activity Based Costing rather than the Traditional
Cost System
Activity-based costing (ABC) emphasizes that activities consume companies' resources and
driver costs (rather than volume alone drives costs). As a result, the companies benefiting the
most from ABC would be companies with a significant amount of overhead pertaining to a
diversity of activities in providing goods (or services) to customers whose demands also vary. In
other words, if your company has little overhead cost and manufactures almost identical products
requiring similar attention for each product, the need for ABC probably isn't there.
The overhead that we are referring to is not limited to manufacturing overhead. Some customers
also demand activities that drive up the administrative overhead and the selling expenses. The
idea behind ABC is that the customers and products that are causing the manufacturing and
administrative overheads to occur should be assigned those costs. If there is the diversity of
products and customers (some require costly activities and some don't), it isn't fair to simply
spread all of the cost of all of the activities to all of the products and customers on the basis of
just one activity, such as machining hours. The non-machining overhead costs should not be
assigned to products and customers that don't require the other activities. The products and
customers that demand the other activities should be assigned the cost of the other activities.
Again, if your company has little variation among products and customers, and most of its
overheads are related to just one activity, such as machining hours, using machine hours to
allocate the overhead costs is probably satisfactory. However, if you manufacture products that
are not uniform in the attention and activities necessary to serve the customer, you should learn
more about activity-based costing.
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
10
Steps to Implement ABC
Geared toward compliance with financial reporting requirements, traditional cost-accounting
systems often allocate costs based on single-volume measures such as direct-labor hours, direct-
labor costs, or machine hours. While using a single volume measure as an overall cost driver
seldom meets the cause-and-effect criterion desired in cost allocation, it provides a relatively
cheap and convenient means of complying with financial reporting requirements.
In contrast to traditional cost-accounting systems, ABC systems are not inherently constrained
by the tenets of financial reporting requirements. Rather, ABC systems have the inherent
flexibility to provide special reports to facilitate management decisions regarding the costs of
activities undertaken to design, produce, sell, and deliver a company's products or services. At
the heart of this flexibility is the fact that ABC systems focus on accumulating costs via several
key activities, whereas traditional cost allocation focuses on accumulating costs via
organizational units. By focusing on specific activities, ABC systems provide superior cost
allocation informationespecially when costs are caused by non-volume-based cost drivers.
Even so, traditional cost-accounting systems will continue to be used to satisfy conventional
financial reporting requirements. ABC systems will continue to supplement, rather than replace,
traditional cost-accounting systems.
In most cases, a company's traditional cost-accounting system adequately measures the direct
costs of products and services, such as material and labor. As a result, ABC implementation
typically focuses on indirect costs, such as manufacturing over-head and selling, general, and
administrative costs. Given this focus, the primary goal of ABC implementation is to reclassify
most, if not all, indirect costs (as specified by the traditional cost-accounting system) as direct
costs. As a result of these reclassifications, the accuracy of the costs is greatly increased.
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
11
According to Ray H. Garrison and Eric W. Noreen, there are six basic steps required to
implement an ABC system:
Six Basic Steps Required to Implement an ABC System
1) Identify and define activities and activity pools.
2) Directly trace costs to activities (to the extent feasible).
3) Assign costs to activity cost pools.
4) Calculate activity rates.
5) Assign costs to cost objects using the activity rates and activity measures previously
determined.
6) Prepare and distribute management reports.
Step 1: Identify and define activities and activity pools
An activity is any process or procedure that consumes overhead resources. The goal is to
understand all the activities required to make the companys products. This requires interviewing
and meeting with personnel throughout the organization. Companies that use activity-based
costing, such as Hewlett Packard and IBM, may identify hundreds of activities required to make
their products. The most challenging part of this step is narrowing down the activities to those
that have the biggest impact on overhead costs.
Step 2: Directly trace costs to activities (to the extent feasible)
This step requires that overhead costs associated with each activity be assigned to the activity
(i.e., a cost pool is formed for each activity). For company, the cost pool for the purchasing
materials activity will include costs for items such as salaries of purchasing personnel, rent for
purchasing department office space, and depreciation of purchasing office equipment.
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
12
Step 3: Assign costs to activity cost pools
A cost driver is the action that causes (or drives) the costs associated with the activity.
Identifying cost drivers requires gathering information and interviewing key personnel in various
areas of the organization, such as purchasing, production, quality control, and accounting.
Step 4: Calculate activity rates
After then, the overall activity rates are calculated by dividing the total activity. It is because; in
the overall level of assignment of cost, the activity rate must have to be found.
Step 5: Assign costs to cost objects using the activity rates and activity measures
previously determined
Cost must have to be assigned to the overall cost objects by the using of the founded activity rate
and then the activity measures must have to be found so that there may have no problems in the
internal as well as external system of the costing.
Step 6: Prepare and distribute management reports
A distributed management report must have to be prepared for the overall betterment of the ABC
costing system and it is a must for the overall system development.
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
13
Recommendation
The overall system of the traditional costing has many lacking and which can be removed by the
using of the ABC costing system. Besides, in many parts the company can be able to get more
and more benefits than the traditional costing system. Thats why the company must have to be
more systematic in using its costing system. On the other hand, the overall system of the
company can be more performance based if the activity based costing can be used by the
company.
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
14
Conclusion
Activity-based costing (ABC) systems don't have to be that complicated, particularly if you just
want better allocation of your overhead costs rather than a system to look at the cost drivers or
the activities that your overhead costs comprise. ABC can be pretty straightforward. This is
especially true in a small- or medium-sized firm. Thats why the company must have to be
systematic and technical in using the ABC costing system.
-
Report on the Reason of Why the Companies Should Implement ABC Rather than Traditional Cost System
15
References & Bibliography
Brimson, A. (1997). Activity Accounting: An Activity-Based Costing Approach. New York:
Wiley.
Cokins, G. (1998). "ABC Can Spell a Simpler, Coherent View of Costs." Computing Canada.
Cokins, G. (1998). "Why Is Traditional Accounting Failing Managers?" Hospital Material
Management Quarterly.
Daly, L. (2001). Pricing for Profitability: Activity-Based Pricing for Competitive Advantage.
New York: Wiley.
Dolan, P. (1999). "Getting Started With ABC." Supply House Times.
Garrison, H. (1999). Managerial Accounting. 9th ed. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Hicks, T. (2002). Activity-Based Costing: Making It Work for Small and Mid-Sized Companies.
2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Horngren, G. (1999). Introduction to Management Accounting. 11th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
Karolefski, J. (2004). "Time Is Money: How Much Are Your Customers Costing You?" Food
Logistics.
Lindahl, W. (1997). "Activity-Based Costing Implementation and Adaptation." Human Resource
Planning.