Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11€”Documents—Web File:...
-
Upload
truonglien -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11€”Documents—Web File:...
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
MLA Office of ResearchWeb publication, September 2011
All material published by the Modern Language Association in any medium is protected by copyright. Users may link to the MLA Web page freely and may quote from MLA publications as allowed by the doctrine of fair use. Written permission is required for any other reproduction of material from any MLA publication.
Send requests for permission to reprint material to the MLA permissions manager by mail (26 Broadway, 3rd floor, New York, NY 10004-1789), e-mail ([email protected]), or fax (646 458-0030).
© 2011 by The Modern Language Association of America
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 1
IN 2010–11 the number of jobs advertised in the MLA Job Information List ( JIL) stabilized. Compared with 2009–10, the number of jobs announced in 2010–11 rose by 90 (8.2%) in the English edition and by 73 (7.1%) in the foreign language edition, although the number of jobs advertised in 2010–11 remains at a level a third below the 2007–08 peak. In 2010–11 the JIL’s En glish edition announced 1,190 positions, compared with 1,100 in 2009–10; the foreign language edition announced 1,095 positions, compared with 1,022 in 2009–10. After trending upward between 2003–04 and 2007–08 (by 285 positions, or 18.5%, in En glish and 395 positions, or 30.7%, in foreign languages), the number of jobs advertised in the JIL declined by 726 (39.8%) in En glish and by 658 (39.2%) in foreign languages over the succeeding two years, 2008–09 and 2009–10. Figure 1 shows the trend lines in the number of jobs advertised across the thirty- six years from 1975–76 to 2010–11. The 1,190 positions advertised in this past year’s En glish edition remain 636 (34.8%) below the 2007–08 peak of 1,826; the 1,022 jobs advertised in the foreign language edition remain 585 (also 34.8%) below the 2007–08 peak of 1,680.
The number of ads in the 2010–11 JIL increased modestly, as did the number of departments and institutions placing them. As shown in figure 2, the 2010–11 En glish edition contained 1,042 ads from 668 departments in 577 institutions. Figure 3 shows the equivalent information for the foreign language edition, which contained 985 ads from 652 departments in 477 institutions. Despite the slight improvement, the number of ads and the number of departments and institutions placing them remain substantially below their 2007–08 levels—down by 604 ads (36.7%), 279 departments (29.5%), and 214 institutions (27.1%) in the En glish edi-tion and down by 536 ads (35.2%), 290 departments (30.8%), and 177 institutions (27.1%) in the foreign language edition.1
Both the number and proportion of ads for tenure- track positions were higher in 2010–11, after dropping more than ten percentage points, to 65% of the En glish edition and to 49% of the foreign language edition, between 2008–09 and 2009–10. In the 2010–11 En glish edition, the number of ads indexed as tenure- track grew by 101 (16.1%) since 2009–10 and made up 70.0% of the year’s total. In the foreign language edition, the number of ads indexed as tenure- track grew by 87 (19.5%) since 2009–10 and made up 54.2% of the 2010–11 total. Until last year, between 75% and 80% of ads in En glish and between 60% and 65% of ads in foreign lan-guages were consistently identified as tenure- track. At 70.0% in En glish and 54.2% in foreign languages this year, the percentage of ads for tenture- track positions falls midway between the established norm and last year’s low (fig. 4 and fig. 5).
Once again this year, departments announced more positions later in the year. For the second year in a row—and only the second time in the thirty- six- year history of the JIL counts—more ads appeared in the February, April, and Summer issues
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
© 2011 by the Modern Language Association of America
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 2
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
than in the October and December issues—52.6% of ads in the En glish edition and 60.0% of ads in the foreign language edition (fig. 6 and fig. 7). The number of jobs in the 2010 October En glish list—308—was the lowest October number on record; the 250 jobs in the 2010 October foreign language list exceeded by 50 last October’s rec-ord low of 200 jobs. In part, the shift, especially the notable decline in ads appearing in the October issues, reflects changes connected with the JIL’s becoming an online searchable database that is updated weekly. The October issues match the database as initially released for searching in mid- September. That is, as a searchable database, the JIL makes the same set of ads available for searching online in mid- September that appear in the print issues published in mid- October. When the JIL was avail-able only in print form, an ad that missed the deadline for October had to wait for the December print issue, which is not mailed until late November. Now an ad that misses the print deadline for October may become available to job seekers online in the third week of September. The economic recession, however, has clearly amplified the emergent trend toward a greater portion of the year’s total appearing in December and later issues.
Almost all the positions announced in the JIL are full- time, and thus the JIL af-fords no insight into the scale of departments’ hiring of part- time faculty members. The number of ads tagged as openings for full- time tenure- track assistant professors and for full- time non- tenure- track instructors does serve as a valuable barometer of trends in opportunities for full- time, entry- level academic employment in four- year institutions available to new and recent graduates of PhD programs. (Few two- year colleges elect to use the JIL to advertise openings on their faculties.) This year, in En-glish, 541 (51.9%) of all 1,042 ads were indexed for both tenure- track and assistant professor; an additional 92 (8.8%) were tagged as tenure- track, assistant professor, and some other rank. In foreign languages, 384 (39.0%) of all 985 ads were indexed for both tenure- track and assistant professor; an additional 70 (7.1%) were tagged as tenure- track, assistant professor, and some other rank. Figure 8 and figure 9 show the modestly higher number and percentage share of ads for tenure- track assistant professors this year as compared with last—as well as the dramatic numerical de-cline that occurred after 2007–08.
Table 1 and table 2 show in more detail how departments have tagged their ads using the four index terms for rank—instructor, assistant professor, associate professor, and professor—across the eleven years from 2000–01 to 2010–11.
Table 3 and table 4 show detail for how departments have used the search terms for field specialization to tag ads across the eleven years 2000–01 to 2010–11. The percentage values represent the percentage of ads tagged using any given search term. Because departments use multiple search terms for each ad, the percentage values sum to a total far greater than 100% of each year’s total number of ads. The percent-age values for field specializations in the En glish edition show considerable stabil-ity across the eleven- year period, compared with the fluctuation in the number of ads. Across the eleven years, roughly 30% of ads have consistently been tagged as composition and rhetoric, another 30% as British literature, and roughly a third as American literature (including African American literature). In the foreign language edition, however, change is evident in the tagging of ads. Over the eleven- year period,
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 3
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
the percentage of ads for Spanish has dropped from close to 50.0% to 42.3%, while the percentage tagged for Chinese has grown from 2.9% to 8.2%.
Note
1. The number of jobs is always somewhat greater than the number of ads, since some ads announce more than one job.
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 4
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
1,4
50 1
,441
1,3
25
1,3
27 1,4
56
1,5
75
1,4
61
1,3
38
1,3
68 1
,492 1,7
00
1,7
41 1
,978 2
,075
1,8
95
1,5
07
1,2
88
1,1
521
,075
1,1
591
,098
1,1
931,1
21 1
,517
1,6
70
1,8
28
1,7
321,6
801
,541
1,7
391,6
87
1,7
93
1,8
26
1,3
801,1
00 1,1
90
1,5
15
1,3
10
1,3
871
,354
1,3
52
1,2
97
1,1
661,2
37
1,2
38
1,4
42
1,6
22
1,7
03 1,8
57 1,8
731,6
371,4
88
1,2
38
1,1
091
,047
1,1
88
1,1
34
1,1
29
1,0
88
1,1
92
1,3
65
1,4
821
,369
1,3
671
,285
1,3
69
1,3
61
1,5
91 1
,680
1,2
27
1,0
22 1
,095
0
500
1,0
00
1,5
00
2,0
00
2,5
00
1975–76
1976–77
1977–78
1978–79
1979–80
1980–81
1981–82
1982–83
1983–84
1984–85
1985–86
1986–87
1987–88
1988–89
1989–90
1990–91
1991–92
1992–93
1993–94
1994–95
1995–96
1996–97
1997–98
1998–99
1999–2000
2000–01
2001–02
2002–03
2003–04
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
2009–10
2010–11
Fig. 1. Total N
umber of Jobs A
dvertised in the ML
A JIL, 1975–76 to 2010–11
English
edition
Foreign lan
guag
e edition
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 5
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
1,6
21
1,5
37
1,4
36
1,3
62
1,4
97
1,4
82
1,5
73
1,6
46
1,2
28
964
1,0
42
892
844
814
788
854
846
887
947
739
639
668
756
705
685
660
728
709
743
791
630
558
577
0 200
400
600
800
1,0
00
1,2
00
1,4
00
0
200
400
600
800
1,0
00
1,2
00
1,4
00
1,6
00
1,8
00
2000–01
2001–02
2002–03
2003–04
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
2009–10
2010–11
Number of Departments and Institutions
Number of Ads
Fig. 2. Num
ber of Ads Placed in the English JIL and the
Num
ber of Departm
ents and Institutions Placing Ads, 2000–01 to 2010–11
Ads
Dep
artmen
tsIn
stitutio
ns
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 6
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
1,3
79
1,2
53
1,2
56
1,1
76
1,2
48
1,2
37
1,4
36
1,5
21
1,1
34
913
985
873
809
831
763
813
799
860
942
736
597
652
617
546
551
528
558
565
604
654
518
446
477
0 200
400
600
800
1,0
00
1,2
00
0
200
400
600
800
1,0
00
1,2
00
1,4
00
1,6
00
2000–01
2001–02
2002–03
2003–04
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
2009–10
2010–11
Number of Departments and Institutions
Number of Ads
Fig. 3. Num
ber of Ads Placed in the Foreign L
anguage JIL and the N
umber of D
epartments and Institutions Placing A
ds, 2000–01 to 2010–11
Ads
Dep
artments
Institu
tions
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 7
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
1,1
93
(79.7
%)
1,1
65
(78.6
%)
1,2
21
(77.6
%)
1,2
44
(75.6
%)
925
(75.3
%)
628
(65.1
%)
729
(70.0
%)
270
(18.0
%)
281
(19.0
%)
315
(20.0
%)
353
(21.4
%)
255
(20.8
%)
304
(31.5
%)
278
(26.7
%)
34 (2
.3%
)36 (2
.4%
)
37 (2
.4%
)49 (3
.0%
)
48 (3
.9%
)
32 (3
.3%
)35 (3
.4%
)
0
200
400
600
800
1,0
00
1,2
00
1,4
00
1,6
00
1,8
00
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
2009–10
2010–11
Fig. 4. Num
ber and Percentage of Ads Indexed for Tenure Status
in the English JIL, 2004–05 to 2010–11
Tenure statu
s not
specified
Non-ten
ure-track
Tenure-track
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 8
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
796
(63.8
%)
800
(64.7
%)
860
(59.9
%)
905
(59.5
%)
695
(61.3
%)
447
(49.0
%)
534
(54.2
%)
417
(33.4
%)
411
(33.2
%)
550
(38.3
%)
576
(37.9
%)
394
(34.7
%)
437
(47.9
%)
420
(42.6
%)
35 (2
.8%
)26 (2
.1%
)
26 (1
.8%
)40 (2
.6%
)
45
(4.0
%)
29 (3
.2%
)31 (3
.1%
)
0
200
400
600
800
1,0
00
1,2
00
1,4
00
1,6
00
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
2009–10
2010–11
Fig. 5. Num
ber and Percentage of Ads Indexed for Tenure Status
in the Foreign Language JIL, 2004–05 to 2010–11
Ten
ure statu
s not
specified
Non-ten
ure-track
Ten
ure-track
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 9
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
434
440
375
438
512
523
551
544
523
567
784
892
937
1053
976
926
735
620
624
679
605
700
698
885
899
959
983
792
649
686
682
723
604
534
313
308
421
405
410
327
385
388
300
338
320
374
326
276
404
354
501
284
275
247
221
249
261
276
205
230
220
335
212
338
303
378
390
375
453
340
189
256
316
319
302
289
339
355
336
261
296
320
373
325
369
382
280
192
190
192
161
153
151
135
139
265
295
312
330
324
306
368
372
371
399
300
302
392
233
223
201
228
185
258
218
153
186
196
180
209
239
236
110
78
71
74
50
61
61
75
55
112
163
126
117
114
123
149
100
147
165
87
126
92
46
54
37
45
35
51
56
42
43
35
37
39
29
50
28
27
17
19
19
17
20
724
25
93
96
90
112
160
175
143
177
205
119
170
142
0
500
1,0
00
1,5
00
2,0
00
2,5
00
1975–76
1976–77
1977–78
1978–79
1979–80
1980–81
1981–82
1982–83
1983–84
1984–85
1985–86
1986–87
1987–88
1988–89
1989–90
1990–91
1991–92
1992–93
1993–94
1994–95
1995–96
1996–97
1997–98
1998–99
1999–2000
2000–01
2001–02
2002–03
2003–04
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
2009–10
2010–11
Fig. 6. Num
ber of Positions Advertised in the Five Issues of the E
nglish JIL,1975–76 to 2010–11
Sum
mer
April
Febru
ary
Dece
mber
Octo
ber
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 10
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
373
323
381
385
412
420
377
463
444
499
695
723
800
863
782
756
606
510
508
638
538
593
606
590
672
666
675
535
447
393
429
452
451
425
200
250
484
425
379
390
380
319
306
299
314
313
328
313
387
375
429
384
344
305
298
286
319
275
204
207
199
274
186
305
240
332
309
363
428
306
193
188
362
293
311
327
299
281
284
263
261
358
331
355
388
372
259
208
186
173
140
182
175
160
165
263
256
279
268
291
292
338
311
358
364
264
301
348
256
221
265
188
203
244
171
163
172
235
223
273
233
214
139
105
78
102
93
68
90
90
73
92
134
151
116
98
165
121
140
172
207
99
124
121
40
48
51
64
58
33
28
49
47
37
45
39
49
49
28
35
24
19
8
14
12
11
40
40
104
112
124
138
141
140
172
246
230
133
204
188
0
500
1,0
00
1,5
00
2,0
00
2,5
00
1975–76
1976–77
1977–78
1978–79
1979–80
1980–81
1981–82
1982–83
1983–84
1984–85
1985–86
1986–87
1987–88
1988–89
1989–90
1990–91
1991–92
1992–93
1993–94
1994–95
1995–96
1996–97
1997–98
1998–99
1999–2000
2000–01
2001–02
2002–03
2003–04
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
2009–10
2010–11
Fig. 7. Num
ber of Positions Advertised in the Five Issues of the Foreign L
anguage JIL,1975–76 to 2010–11
Sum
mer
April
Febru
ary
Decem
ber
Octob
er
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 11
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
850
(56.8
%)
806
(54.4
%)
884
(56.2
%)
877
(53.3
%)
645
(52.5
%)
469
(48.7
%)
541
(51.9
%)
176
(11.8
%)
190
(12.8
%)
181
(11.5
%)
192
(11.7
%)
151
(12.3
%)
78 (8
.1%
)
92 (8
.8%
)
167
(11.2
%)
169
(11.4
%)
156
(9.9
%)
175
(10.6
%)
129 (1
0.5
%)
81 (8
.4%
)
96 (9
.2%
)
270
(18.0
%)
281
(19.0
%)
315
(20.0
%)
353
(21.4
%)
255
(20.8
%)
304
(31.5
%)
278
(26.7
%)
34 (2
.3%
)36 (2
.4%
)
37 (2
.4%
)49 (3
.0%
)
48 (3
.9%
)
32 (3
.3%
)
35 (3
.4%
)
0
200
400
600
800
1,0
00
1,2
00
1,4
00
1,6
00
1,8
00
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
2009–10
2010–11
Fig. 8. Num
ber and Percentage of Ads Indexed for Tenure Status and R
ankin the E
nglish JIL, 2004–05 to 2010–11
Ten
ure sta
tus n
ot specified
Non
-tenure-track p
ositions
Oth
er tenure-track p
ositions
Ten
ure-track assistan
t pro
fessor
and so
me oth
er rank (m
ore th
anon
e index term
for rank ch
osen)
Ten
ure-track assistan
t pro
fessor
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 12
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
556
(44.6
%)
569
(46.0
%)
642
(44.7
%)
634
(41.7
%)
518
(45.7
%)
322
(35.3
%)
384
(39.0
%)
123 (9
.9%
)121 (9
.8%
)
114 (7
.9%
)140 (9
.2%
)
97 (8
.6%
)
56 (6
.1%
)
70 (7
.1%
)
117 (9
.4%
)110 (8
.9%
)
104 (7
.2%
)131 (8
.6%
)
80 (7
.1%
)
69 (7
.6%
)
80 (8
.1%
)
417
(33.4
%)
411
(33.2
%)
550
(38.3
%)
576
(37.9
%)
394
(34.7
%)
437
(47.9
%)
420
(42.6
%)
35 (2
.8%
)26 (2
.1%
)
26 (1
.8%
)
40 (2
.6%
)
45 (4
.0%
)
29 (3
.2%
)
31 (3
.1%
)
0
200
400
600
800
1,0
00
1,2
00
1,4
00
1,6
00
2004–05
2005–06
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
2009–10
2010–11
Fig. 9. Num
ber and Percentage of Ads Indexed for Tenure Status and R
ankin the Foreign L
anguage JIL, 2004–05 to 2010–11
Tenure statu
s not sp
ecified
Non-ten
ure-tra
ck positio
ns
Oth
er tenure-track p
ositio
ns
Tenure-tra
ck assistan
t pro
fessor
and som
e oth
er ra
nk (m
ore
than
one in
dex term
for ra
nk ch
osen
)
Tenure-tra
ck assistan
t pro
fessor
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 13
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
Table 1. Num
ber and Percentage of Ads in the English JIL
Indexed for Various Ranks, 2000–01 to 2010–11
2000–012001–02
2002–032003–04
2004–052005–06
2006–072007–08
2008–092009–10
2010–11A
ssistant professor1,025
1,006963
865956
9141,005
990714
562643
63.2%65.5%
67.1%63.5%
63.9%61.7%
63.9%60.1%
58.1%58.3%
61.7%Instructor or assistant professor
4430
3640
3546
3734
1825
272.7%
2.0%2.5%
2.9%2.3%
3.1%2.4%
2.1%1.5%
2.6%2.6%
Assistant professor or associate professor
123105
96122
122121
121125
10549
637.6%
6.8%6.7%
9.0%8.1%
8.2%7.7%
7.6%8.6%
5.1%6.0%
Assistant professor, associate professor, or professor
6479
5244
5360
5370
5541
243.9%
5.1%3.6%
3.2%3.5%
4.0%3.4%
4.3%4.5%
4.3%2.3%
Other com
binations including assistant professor17
107
813
139
128
99
1.0%0.7%
0.5%0.6%
0.9%0.9%
0.6%0.7%
0.7%0.9%
0.9%Instructor
148123
113103
136125
130178
158157
1209.1%
8.0%7.9%
7.6%9.1%
8.4%8.3%
10.8%12.9%
16.3%11.5%
Associate professor
1722
1730
2124
2728
1710
191.0%
1.4%1.2%
2.2%1.4%
1.6%1.7%
1.7%1.4%
1.0%1.8%
Associate professor or professor
6265
5040
6251
7771
4528
283.8%
4.2%3.5%
2.9%4.1%
3.4%4.9%
4.3%3.7%
2.9%2.7%
Professor
4639
4255
4261
4054
3823
312.8%
2.5%2.9%
4.0%2.8%
4.1%2.5%
3.3%3.1%
2.4%3.0%
Other com
binations not including assistant professor1
10
12
30
00
30
0.1%0.1%
0.0%0.1%
0.1%0.2%
0.0%0.0%
0.0%0.3%
0.0%R
ank not specified or not relevant74
5760
5455
6474
8470
5778
4.6%3.7%
4.2%4.0%
3.7%4.3%
4.7%5.1%
5.7%5.9%
7.5%Total
1,6211,537
1,4361,362
1,4971,482
1,5731,646
1,228964
1,042100.0%
100.0%100.0%
100.0%100.0%
100.0%100.0%
100.0%100.0%
100.0%100.0%
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 14
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
Table 2. Num
ber and Percentage of Ads in the Foreign Language JIL
Indexed for Various Ranks, 2000–01 to 2010–11
2000–012001–02
2002–032003–04
2004–052005–06
2006–072007–08
2008–092009–10
2010–11A
ssistant professor791
739765
667689
686791
779635
452503
57.4%59.0%
60.9%56.7%
55.2%55.5%
55.1%51.2%
56.0%49.5%
51.1%Instructor or assistant professor
9371
5475
7269
6569
5246
536.7%
5.7%4.3%
6.4%5.8%
5.6%4.5%
4.5%4.6%
5.0%5.4%
Assistant professsor or associate professor
6562
7665
7661
7386
6436
534.7%
4.9%6.1%
5.5%6.1%
4.9%5.1%
5.7%5.6%
3.9%5.4%
Assistant professor, associate professor, or professor
4247
3430
4249
4258
3626
113.0%
3.8%2.7%
2.6%3.4%
4.0%2.9%
3.8%3.2%
2.8%1.1%
Other com
binations including assistant professor17
810
78
912
178
88
1.2%0.6%
0.8%0.6%
0.6%0.7%
0.8%1.1%
0.7%0.9%
0.8%Instructor
201183
171192
210219
301320
194220
21814.6%
14.6%13.6%
16.3%16.8%
17.7%21.0%
21.0%17.1%
24.1%22.1%
Associate professor
2011
811
1517
1424
1613
71.5%
0.9%0.6%
0.9%1.2%
1.4%1.0%
1.6%1.4%
1.4%0.7%
Associate professor or professor
4945
5048
5650
4943
3426
323.6%
3.6%4.0%
4.1%4.5%
4.0%3.4%
2.8%3.0%
2.8%3.2%
Professor
3331
2726
2934
2943
2626
282.4%
2.5%2.1%
2.2%2.3%
2.7%2.0%
2.8%2.3%
2.8%2.8%
Other com
binations not including assistant professor0
00
10
01
22
30
0.0%0.0%
0.0%0.1%
0.0%0.0%
0.1%0.1%
0.2%0.3%
0.0%R
ank not specified or not relevant68
5661
5451
4359
8067
5772
4.9%4.5%
4.9%4.6%
4.1%3.5%
4.1%5.3%
5.9%6.2%
7.3%Total
1,3791,253
1,2561,176
1,2481,237
1,4361,521
1,134913
985100.0%
100.0%100.0%
100.0%100.0%
100.0%100.0%
100.0%100.0%
100.0%100.0%
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 15
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
Table 3. Percentage of Ads Published in the English JIL
, 2000–01 to 2010–11, by Field-Specialization Index TermIndex term
2000–012001–02
2002–032003–04
2004–052005–06
2006–072007–08
2008–092009–10
2010–11C
omposition and rhetoric
30.832.0
29.029.4
32.329.6
29.132.1
30.733.0
31.4Technical and business w
riting11.5
10.09.9
8.510.4
9.98.2
8.27.6
10.39.4
Creative w
riting14.2
15.412.6
12.712.7
13.614.6
14.912.0
10.19.9
British literature
30.829.5
28.628.0
24.224.6
28.228.7
30.230.3
30.1A
merican literature
27.023.7
24.024.4
20.821.0
24.022.1
23.024.9
24.7Literature in E
nglish other than British or A
merican
13.612.9
12.612.8
0.00.0
11.87.4
9.710.0
8.6A
frican Am
erican literature12.6
10.410.9
10.98.8
9.410.3
8.08.6
7.48.9
Other m
inority literatures14.2
11.812.3
11.78.2
9.911.2
7.79.0
7.19.2
Postcolonial literature
0.00.0
0.00.0
7.88.2
8.86.6
9.48.0
7.6W
orld literature0.0
0.00.0
0.08.4
8.89.9
7.49.3
9.410.0
Com
parative literature13.8
14.918.0
17.211.6
12.814.1
15.616.4
19.024.5
Generalist
15.413.7
11.412.5
12.211.8
10.914.1
9.913.2
13.4C
riticism, theory
6.35.7
6.76.9
7.37.6
9.1C
ultural studies9.9
12.011.1
11.812.1
10.614.0
Film4.9
6.46.7
6.56.8
7.88.3
Technology and digital media
7.76.5
8.59.8
10.69.0
11.114.1
Interdisciplinary10.4
11.010.5
10.910.4
10.813.1
English education
7.98.7
7.67.4
6.76.3
7.47.8
9.29.3
8.4Linguistics and E
SL
11.011.5
10.89.8
12.311.1
9.113.4
12.312.6
15.0O
ther fields of specialization16.6
20.023.7
24.26.0
14.719.8
21.422.2
25.327.4
Departm
ent chair and other administrative
9.09.5
7.29.9
13.114.0
8.38.9
8.97.6
7.4N
onacademic
1.81.6
1.21.0
1.30.6
1.41.4
0.21.6
0.8S
panish1.8
2.32.0
1.31.8
1.11.4
2.12.5
3.63.5
Latin Am
erica1.0
1.41.7
1.30.9
0.71.0
0.91.0
1.61.2
Portuguese
0.40.5
0.30.4
0.40.1
0.40.4
0.20.2
0.5French
1.01.2
1.21.0
1.10.7
0.71.8
2.43.3
3.1Francophone studies
0.30.4
0.70.7
0.20.3
0.50.4
0.50.7
0.3Italian
0.40.1
0.40.4
0.40.1
0.40.4
0.51.0
1.1G
erman and S
candinavian0.7
1.20.8
0.70.8
0.71.0
1.62.0
3.02.4
Russian and S
lavic0.1
1.20.3
0.30.4
0.10.2
0.40.7
1.71.2
Arabic
0.10.7
0.30.2
0.40.6
1.00.8
0.81.1
1.3H
ebrew0.2
0.60.3
0.10.3
0.50.6
0.70.5
0.70.6
Classical
0.30.8
0.60.4
0.30.5
0.40.5
0.51.0
0.7C
hinese0.3
0.90.9
0.50.3
0.71.0
0.40.7
1.51.6
Japanese0.4
0.40.6
0.50.5
0.70.8
0.20.2
0.61.0
Other languages
1.21.2
0.92.0
1.71.8
1.71.2
1.62.6
3.0N
umber of ads (basis for percentages)
1,6211,537
1,4361,362
1,4971,482
1,5731,646
1,228964
1,042N
otesD
epartments m
ay use multiple index term
s to classify their ads, therefore the percentage of ads indexed for various field specialties adds up to a total greater than 100%.
The list of terms available for departm
ents to index their ads has varied from year to year; blank cells indicate years w
hen a given term w
as not available.In any given year som
e 150 to 300 ads call for specializations in both English and foreign languages and appear in both the E
nglish and foreign language editions; both English and
foreign language index terms are available to classify these ads.
Burns—Documents—Web File: Sept_Rpt_JIL10-11_P1T1.indd Job #: 190-10 9/6/11–LG
the modern language association of america 16
Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2010–11
Table 4. Percentage of Ads Published in the Foreign Language JIL
, 2000–01 to 2010–11, by Field-Specialization Index TermIndex term
2000–012001–02
2002–032003–04
2004–052005–06
2006–072007–08
2008–092009–10
2010–11S
panish48.4
49.745.8
45.746.6
45.442.8
43.742.9
43.042.3
Latin Am
erica13.4
13.213.5
12.513.9
12.911.6
11.812.2
13.39.8
Portuguese
2.03.2
2.53.1
2.92.7
3.33.2
3.02.2
3.9French
18.817.7
17.816.3
19.616.8
17.816.5
16.818.6
19.0Francophone studies
3.83.9
4.54.0
5.04.0
5.24.8
5.75.5
4.6Italian
7.35.8
6.76.5
7.15.8
7.46.6
7.05.9
6.4G
erman and S
candinavian11.4
12.79.6
11.711.0
11.010.9
11.811.6
11.611.3
Russian and S
lavic3.3
4.74.1
3.73.0
3.82.1
2.44.4
4.64.8
Arabic
1.21.7
1.92.6
3.34.6
5.03.9
5.35.5
7.3C
hinese2.9
4.34.7
2.62.6
4.37.5
6.07.1
8.38.2
Japanese3.0
3.93.0
2.63.2
4.03.8
2.63.1
4.14.0
Hebrew
1.01.4
1.11.0
1.01.2
1.11.2
1.31.6
1.2C
lassical1.3
1.52.0
0.90.8
0.90.6
1.11.1
1.80.9
Other languages
3.34.4
3.64.7
4.25.7
4.84.9
5.87.0
6.6Linguistics and E
SL
16.516.4
16.013.4
17.415.8
12.315.4
14.013.9
16.5C
omparative literature
13.715.2
19.718.4
12.415.8
13.416.5
16.917.1
22.2W
orld literature2.6
3.23.3
2.93.5
3.24.1
Cultural studies
6.05.5
4.45.9
5.65.9
7.8P
ostcolonial literature1.2
1.51.5
1.62.2
2.52.0
Criticism
, theory2.8
1.81.8
2.73.5
3.64.8
Film1.7
1.61.5
3.22.8
3.14.2
Technology and digital media
5.94.6
4.44.9
5.74.1
4.47.8
Interdisciplinary5.4
4.95.6
6.35.8
6.47.9
Generalist
19.920.6
18.213.1
11.110.9
7.16.0
6.56.0
5.9D
epartment chair and other adm
inistrative5.5
5.75.1
7.710.4
9.17.5
7.67.0
6.27.0
Am
erican literature2.6
3.53.1
2.62.6
1.92.0
2.54.1
4.84.1
African A
merican literature
2.41.1
2.41.8
1.41.0
0.81.0
1.61.8
1.8O
ther minority literatures
2.93.4
4.63.7
3.12.7
2.92.2
2.32.1
3.6B
ritish literature2.0
2.82.0
1.82.2
1.51.3
2.63.9
4.84.1
Literature in English other than B
ritish or Am
erican2.0
3.33.6
3.30.0
0.01.3
1.62.0
2.42.0
Com
position and rhetoric1.3
1.00.8
1.01.0
1.10.7
1.10.6
1.11.3
Technical and business writing
0.30.1
0.20.1
0.20.1
0.10.1
0.10.2
0.2C
reative writing
0.61.3
0.81.0
0.30.3
0.70.4
0.41.0
0.5E
nglish education1.0
1.00.3
0.60.2
0.50.8
0.91.0
0.80.5
Other fields of specialization
11.416.2
18.820.6
8.614.9
17.918.9
19.021.6
25.9N
onacademic
2.22.1
1.51.3
1.10.8
1.21.1
0.31.3
1.2N
umber of ads (basis for percentages)
1,3791,253
1,2561,176
1,2481,237
1,4361,521
1,134913
985N
otesD
epartments m
ay use multiple index term
s to classify their ads, therefore the percentage of ads indexed for various field specialties adds up to a total greater than 100%.
The list of terms available for departm
ents to index their ads has varied from year to year; blank cells indicate years w
hen a given term w
as not available.In any given year som
e 150 to 300 ads call for specializations in both English and foreign languages and appear in both the E
nglish and foreign language editions; both English and
foreign language index terms are available to classify these ads.