Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2020...fre Inttute stue n Eucaton Polcy 7 Note that...

FRASERINST I TUTE

COMPARESCHOOLRANKINGS.ORG

Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2020

Peter Cowley and Joel Emes

Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools

20203

By Peter Cowley and Joel Emes

2

About the authors / 253

Publishing information / 254

Supporting the Fraser Institute / 255

Purpose, funding, & independence / 255

About the Fraser Institute / 256

Editorial Advisory Board / 256

Contents

Introduction / 3

Key academic indicators of school performance / 5

Other indicators of school performance / 8

Notes / 9

Detailed school reports / 10

How does your school stack up? / 224

Appendix: Calculating the Overall rating out of 10 / 251

3

The Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2020 (hereafter, Report Card) collects a variety of relevant, objective indicators of school performance into one, easily accessible public document so that anyone can analyze and compare the performance of individual schools. By doing so, the Report Card assists parents when they choose a school for their children and encourages and assists all those seeking to improve their schools.

The Report Card helps parents choose

Where parents can choose among several schools for their children, the Report Card provides a valuable tool for making a decision. Because it makes compari-sons easy, it alerts parents to those nearby schools that appear to have more effective academic programs. Parents can also determine whether schools of interest are improving over time. By first studying the Report Card, parents will be better prepared to ask relevant questions when they visit schools under consideration and speak with the staff.

Of course, the choice of a school should not be made solely on the basis of a single source of informa-tion. Web sites maintained by Ontario’s Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO),1 the pro-vincial ministry of education, and local school boards may also provide useful information.2 Parents who already have a child enrolled at the school provide another point of view.

Naturally, a sound academic program should be complemented by effective programs in areas of school activity not measured by the Report Card. Nevertheless, the Report Card provides a detailed

picture of each school that is not easily available elsewhere.

The Report Card facilitates school improvement

The act of publicly rating and ranking schools attracts attention, and this can provide motivation. Schools that perform well or show consistent improvement are applauded. Poorly performing schools generate concern, as do those whose performance is deteriorat-ing. This inevitable attention provides an incentive for all those connected with a school to focus on student results.

However, the Report Card offers more than just incentive. It includes a variety of indicators, each of which reports results for an aspect of school perfor-mance that may be improved. School administrators who are dedicated to their students’ academic success accept the Report Card as another source of opportu-nities for improvement.

Some schools do better than othersTo improve a school, one must believe that improve-ment is achievable. This Report Card, like other report cards from the Fraser Institute, provides evidence about what can be accomplished. It demonstrates clearly that, even when we take into account factors such as the stu-dents’ family income—which some believe dictate the degree of academic success that students can enjoy in school—some schools do better than others. This find-ing confirms the results of research carried out in other countries.3 Indeed, it will come as no great surprise to experienced parents and educators that the data consis-tently suggest that what goes on in the schools makes

Introduction

http://www.compareschoolrankings.orghttp://www.eqao.comhttp://www.eqao.com


a difference to academic results and that some schools make a greater difference than others.

Comparisons are at the heart of the improvement processBy comparing a school’s latest results with those of earlier years, we can see if the school is improving. By comparing a school’s results with those of neigh-bouring schools or schools having similar school and student characteristics, we can identify more success-ful schools and learn from them. Reference to overall provincial results places an individual school’s level of achievement in a broader context.

There is great benefit in identifying schools that are particularly effective. By studying the techniques

used in schools where students are successful, less effective schools may find ways to improve.

Comparisons are at the heart of improvement: making comparisons among schools is made simpler and more meaningful by the Report Card ’s indicators, ratings, and rankings.

You can contribute to the development of the Report Card

The Report Card program benefits from the input of interested parties. We welcome your suggestions, comments, and criticisms. Please contact [email protected].

5

The foundation of the Report Card is an overall rating of each school’s academic performance. We base our Overall rating out of 10 on the school’s performance on nine indicators, all of which are derived from province-wide tests of reading, writ-ing, and mathematics skills that are developed and managed by the province’s Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO).4

(1) average level of achievement on the grade-3 EQAO assessment in reading;

(2) average level of achievement on the grade-3 EQAO assessment in writing;

(3) average level of achievement on the grade-3 EQAO assessment in mathematics;

(4) average level of achievement on the grade-6 EQAO assessment in reading;

(5) average level of achievement on the grade-6 EQAO assessment in writing;

(6) average level of achievement on the grade-6 EQAO assessment in mathematics;

(7) the difference between male and female students in their average levels of achievement on the EQAO assessment in grade-6 reading;

(8) the difference between male and female students in their average levels of achievement on the EQAO assessment in grade-6 mathematics;

(9) the percentage of EQAO assessments that did not meet the provincial standard.

We have selected this set of indicators because they provide systematic insight into a school’s performance. Because they are based on annually generated data, we can assess not only each school’s performance in a year but also its improvement or deterioration over time.

Indicators of effective teaching

Average levels of achievement on EQAO’s assessmentsThese indicators—in the tables, Grade 3 avg. level and Grade 6 avg. level—show the average level of proficiency achieved by the school’s students on the uniform EQAO assessments in reading, writing, and mathematics at the grade-3 and grade-6 levels. The EQAO converts the raw score on each test into a level of achievement from 1 to 4. Achievement at Levels 1 and 2 suggest that the student has not yet met the provincial standard. Level 3 is considered the provin-cial standard and Level 4 represents achievement well above the provincial standard. Achievement at Level 3 or 4 suggests that students are well prepared for work at the next grade.

In order to calculate the average level achieved by the students at a school on any given test, a numerical value was given to each level of achievement. Thus, Level 1 was given a value of 1 for purposes of deter-mining the average; Level 2, a value of 2; Level 3, a value of 3; and Level 4, a value of 4. A value of 0 was given in those cases where a student completed the test but did not demonstrate sufficient understanding to be assigned achievement Level 1.

Fundamental to the mission of elementary schools is teaching students sound basic skills in reading, writing, and mathematics. Basic literacy and numera-

Key academic indicators of school performance

http://www.compareschoolrankings.org


cy are essential building blocks for life-long learning. The tests upon which the Report Card is based assess students on these dimensions. Differences among students in abilities, motivation, and work habits will inevitably have some impact upon the final results. There are, however, recognizable differences from school to school within a district in the average results on the EQAO’s tests. There is also variation within schools in the results obtained in different subject areas and at different grades. Such differences in out-comes cannot be wholly explained by the individual and family characteristics of the school’s students. It seems reasonable, therefore, to include the average test marks in these three critical subject areas as indicators of effective teaching.

Percentage of EQAO tests below standardFor each school, this indicator—in the tables Tests below standard (%)—provides the rate of failure to meet the provincial standard on the EQAO’s tests. It was derived by dividing the total number of all the above tests that provided enough information to enable the calculation of a score but that did not meet the provincial standard, by the total number of such tests written by the students at the school.

Since reading, writing, and mathematics are critical to students’ further intellectual and personal development, students should, at the minimum, demonstrate that they meet the accepted standard of performance for their grade in these subject areas. Schools have the responsibility of ensuring that their students are adequately prepared to do so.

How well do the teachers take student differences into account? The Gender gap indicators

The Gender gap indicators—in the tables Gender gap (level)—use the grade-6 results of the EQAO’s assess-ments to determine how successful the school has been in narrowing the achievement gap between male and female students in reading and mathematics.5 These indicators are determined, for each subject area, by

calculating the absolute value of the difference between male and female students in their average level of achievement. The difference is reported along with the more successful sex in the detailed tables.

Undoubtedly, some personal and family character-istics, left unmitigated, can have a deleterious effect on a student’s academic development. The Report Card provides evidence that successful teachers over-come such impediments. By comparing the results of male and female students in two subject areas—read-ing and mathematics—in which one group or the other may have enjoyed a historical advantage, we are able to gauge the extent to which schools provide effective teaching to all of their students.

In general, how is the school doing academically compared to other schools in the Report Card? The Overall rating out of 10

While each of the indicators is important, it is almost always the case that any school does better on some indicators than on others. So, just as a teacher must make a decision about a student’s overall perfor-mance, we need an overall indicator of school per-formance—in the tables Overall rating out of 10. Just as teachers combine test scores, homework, and class participation to rate a student, we have combined the indicators to produce an overall rating. The overall rating of school performance answers the question, “In general, how is the school doing academically, compared to other schools in the Report Card?”

To derive this rating, the results for each of the nine indicators, for each school year, were first standardized. Standardization is a statistical procedure whereby sets of raw data with different characteristics are converted into sets of values sharing certain statistical properties. Standardized values can readily be combined and com-pared. The standardized data were then weighted and combined to produce an overall standardized score. Finally, this score was converted into an overall rating out of 10. It is from this Overall rating out of 10 that the school’s provincial rank is determined.

6

Fraser Institute Studies in Education Policy 7

Note that the Overall rating out of 10, based as it is on standardized scores, is a relative rating. That is, it measures each school’s performance compared to all the other schools in the Report Card. Thus, even though a school receives an overall rating of 10, it is very likely that it can still improve. An overall rating of zero means that on average, on the report card’s indicators, no school in the Report Card performed more poorly. However, it does not mean that the low-est performing school has accomplished nothing for its students.

Further, because it is a relative measure, in order for a school to show improvement in its Overall rating out of 10, it must improve faster than the average. If it improves, but at a rate lower than the average, it will show a decline in its rating.

For schools where there were fewer than 10 test results for boys or for girls, no values for the Gender gap indicators can be provided. In these cases the Overall rating out of 10 is derived using the remaining indicators. (See the Appendix for an explanation of the calculation of the Overall rating out of 10.)

8

Other indicators of school performance

The Report Card includes other indicators that, while they are not used to derive the Overall rating out of 10, add more information on the school’s effectiveness.

The Tests not written indicator

Schools that administer the EQAO’s assessments are expected to ensure that all their students write the tests. Higher participation rates provide the benefit of objective assessment of learning to more students and parents. They also provide a more accurate reflection of the level of achievement at the school. A reader can have more confidence that the test results are a true reflection of the school’s average achievement level if all, or almost all, of its students write the tests.

The indicator of tests not written—in the tables Tests not written (%)—was determined by first sum-ming, for each of the six test sittings, the total number of students for whom no test data were submitted or who were exempt from testing. The six sums were then totaled. This result was then divided by the total number of tests that could have been completed if all students had fully participated in all of the tests that were administered at the school.

The principal of a school at which a relatively

large percentage of students did not complete the tests should be able to provide good reasons for the students’ failure to do so and a well-developed plan to increase participation in future test sittings.

The Trend indicator

No ranking was possible in the 2014-2015 school year as the result of job action by the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario which means the four-year trend is currently not possible.

The student characteristics indicators

For each school, the Report Card notes the per-centage of its students who are enrolled in ESL pro-grams or who have certain identified special needs. As was noted in the Introduction, it is sometimes useful to compare a school’s results to those of similar schools. These two indicators can be used to identify schools with similar student body characteristics. A variety of comparisons between schools can be made on the Fraser Institute’s school rankings website,

8

http://www.compareschoolrankings.orghttp://www.compareschoolrankings.org

9

Notes

1 The Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO) is an arm’s-length agency of the provincial government. It provides parents, teachers, and the general public with information about student achievement. For more informa-tion, see the EQAO’s web site at .

2 See, for instance the Ministry of Education’s web site at , or the web site of the Toronto Catholic District School Board at .

3 See, for instance, Michael Rutter et al., Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979) and Peter Mortimore

et al., School Matters: The Junior Years (Wells, Somerset: Open Books, 1988).

4 The EQAO’s test results, student enrolment data, and school information used or report-ed in this publication were provided by the Ontario Ministry of Education. The results or views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and are not those of the Ontario Ministry of Education.

5 For a discussion of gender-based differentials in academic achievement, see Peter Cowley and Stephen Easton, Boys, Girls, and Grades: Academic Gender Balance in British Columbia’s Secondary Schools. Public Policy Sources 22 (Vancouver, BC: The Fraser Institute, 1999).

10

Detailed school reports

How to read these tables

Use the sample table and the explanation of each line below to help you interpret the detailed results for individual schools. Families choosing a school for their children should seek to confirm the Report Card ’s findings by visiting the school and inter-viewing teachers, school administrators, and other parents. For an easily used school comparison tool, please go to . More information regarding test results at individual schools can be found on the Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO) web site at and on the web sites of local school districts and schools. Of course, a sound academic program should be complemented

by effective programs in areas of school activity not measured by the Report Card.

NotePrivate schools are not required to administer the EQAO tests. Since the Report Card is based on results achieved on these tests, only those that chose to administer the EQAO tests could be included.

IMPORTANT: In order to get the most from the Report Card, readers should consult the com-plete table of results for each school of interest. By considering several years of results—rather than just a school’s rank in the most recent year—readers can get a better idea of how the school is likely to perform in the future.

A — Geographical area The schools are grouped into geographical areas. To find a school’s results, find its location in the “List of cities and geographical areas” and note its geographical area. Find the

geographical area in the “Index of geographical areas” and note the page on which its results begin. Within each geographical area, the schools are listed in alphabetical order.

GEOGRAPHICAL AREASchool name AffiliationLocation Gr 6 enrolment: 36ESL (%): 0.0 Special needs (%): 13.9Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents’ avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2610/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.8 2.7 3.0 2.5 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.3 n/a Math n/a 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.1 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 2.7 2.9 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.0 2.2 1.9 2.1 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.3 F 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a F 0.2 E E M 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 41.9 40.1 35.4 49.2 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 3.4 4.0 1.1 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 4.8 5.3 5.5 4.1 n/a

A –B –

C –D –

E –F –G –H –I –J –K –L –

M –N –O –

–

– P

–

http://www.compareschoolrankings.orghttp://www.compareschoolrankings.orghttp://www.compareschoolrankings.orghttp://www.compareschoolrankings.orghttp://www.eqao.com


B (left) — School name and location The school name and the city in which it is located.

B (right) — Affiliation and Grade-6 enrolment The school’s affiliation—public, Catholic, First Nations, or private—The number of students eligible to participate in the grade-6 tests. Indicator results for schools with small enrolments tend to be more variable than do those for larger schools. For this reason it is particularly important to consider previous results as well as those for the most recent year.

C — ESL (%); Special needs (%) These statistics report the percentage of the students for whom English is a second-language and the percentage of students with special needs. When you want to compare academic results, these statistics can be used to find other schools were the student body has similar characteristics.

D (left) — Actual rating vs predicted based on parents’ average employment income This statistic is not available this year.

D (right) — Rank The school’s overall academic rank in the province for 2018/2019. The rankings show how the school has done academically compared to the other schools in the Report Card. A high ranking over several years indicates consistently strong results at the school.

E to J — Gr 3 avg score and Gr 6 avg score The average level achieved by the students on the grade-3 and grade-6 EQAO tests. The EQAO assigns a level of achievement to each completed test. Achievement at Levels 1 and 2 suggest that the student has not yet met the provincial standard. Level 3 is considered the provincial standard and Level 4 represents achievement well above the provincial standard. Thus, achievement at Level 3 or 4 suggests that students are well-prepared for work at the next grade. In order to calculate the average level, a numerical value was given to each level of achievement. Thus, Level 1 was given a value of 1 for purposes

of determining the average; Level 2, a value of 2; Level 3, a value of 3; and Level 4, a value of 4. In those cases where a student completed the test but did not demonstrate sufficient understanding to be assigned achievement Level 1, the test was given a value of 0.

K & L — Gr 6 gender gap The difference (in average level of achievement) between girls and boys in the grade-6 reading and mathematics tests. Where the difference favours the girls, the value is preceded by an F. Where boys are favoured, the value is preceded by an M. An E means that there is no difference between the girls and the boys on this measure. Smaller differences indicate that the school is doing a good job for all its students.

M — Tests below standard The percentage of all the completed tests written by students at the school that were judged to be below Level 3. A low percentage of Tests below standard (%) indicates that the school is successful in ensuring that most of its students are meeting or exceeding the provincial standard of performance for the grade.

N — Tests not written (%) The percentage of the tests that could have been completed by the school’s students but which were not assigned an overall score. The indicator takes into account tests not written by students for any reason.

Schools that administer these tests are expected to ensure that all their students participate. For this reason, you should take note of the Tests not written percentage when you consider each school’s results in the Report Card. The principal of a school with a high Tests not written percentage should be able to provide good reasons for the students’ failure to complete the tests.

O — Overall rating out of 10 The Overall rating out of 10 takes into account the nine indicators described in E through M above to answer the question, “In general, how is the school doing academically compared to other schools in the Report Card?”


P — Trends As the result of a job action by the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario, no grade 3 or grade 6 province-wide tests were administered in the public schools during the 2014/2015 school year.

Since the results from these tests are used in the calculation of five-year trends, no improvement analysis is currently available.

Other notes

Note 1Not all the province’s elementary schools are included in the tables or the ranking. In some school districts that operate middle schools or junior high schools, the elementary schools may not enroll students in grade 6. Since the Report Card is based on the results of tests given in grades 3 and 6, these elementary schools cannot be included. In addition, schools at which fewer than 10 students were enrolled in each of these grades are excluded. Private schools and federally funded schools operated by First Nations are not required to administer the EQAO tests. Since the results of these tests form the basis for this Report Card, only those schools that administer the EQAO tests could be included. Finally, also excluded are schools that did not generate a sufficiently large set of student data to enable the calculation of an Overall rating out of 10.

The exclusion of a school from the Report Card should not be considered a judgement of the school’s effectiveness.

Note 2The EQAO’s test results, student enrolment data, and school information used or reported in this publication were provided by the Ontario Ministry of Education. The results or views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and are not those of the Ontario Ministry of Education.

Note 3Due to continuing improvements in methodology,

some historical values for indicators and overall rat-ings may differ from those previously reported.

Note 4In accordance with its regulations regarding the privacy of personal information, where the results in a test involved fewer than 10 students, the EQAO provided no data.

Note 5Where there were insufficient data available with which to calculate an indicator or where a school was not in operation during a specific year, “n/a” appears in the tables.

Note 6You can compare a school’s results with these all-schools average results in the table below. Comparisons among schools are easily made on the Fraser Institute’s school rankings website, .

Note 7If you have questions about the Report Card, please contact [email protected].

Average values for all schools Gr 6 enrollment: 41ESL (%): 8.6 Special Needs (%): 24.1Parents’ avg income: $ n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.4 n/aGender gap (level):* Reading n/a 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 n/aGender gap (level):* Math n/a 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 28.9 28.7 29.1 29.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 n/a

* These results reflect the average size of the grade 6 gen-der gaps in 2018/2019. The Reading gender gap favoured females at 74.2% of schools, males at 11.6% of schools, and was even at 14.2% of schools. The Math gender gap favoured males at 43.2% of schools, females at 42.4% of schools, and was even at 14.4% of schools.

http://www.compareschoolrankings.orghttp://www.compareschoolrankings.org


List of cities and geographical areasCity Geographical area City Geographical area

Acton Halton AreaAddison Upper Canada AreaAilsa Craig Thames Valley AreaAjax Durham AreaAkwesasne Upper Canada AreaAlexandria Upper Canada AreaAlfred Upper Canada AreaAlliston Simcoe County AreaAlma Upper Grand AreaAlmonte Upper Canada AreaAlton Upper Grand AreaAlvinston Lambton Kent AreaAmeliasburgh Hastings-Limestone AreaAmherstburg Greater Essex AreaAmherstview Hastings-Limestone AreaAncaster Hamilton-Wentworth AreaAngus Simcoe County AreaApsley Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaArmstrong Lakehead AreaArnprior Renfrew County AreaArthur Upper Grand AreaArva Thames Valley AreaAstorville Near North AreaAthens Upper Canada AreaAtikokan Kenora AreaAttawapiskat Ontario North East AreaAtwood Avon Maitland AreaAurora York AreaAvonmore Upper Canada AreaAylmer Thames Valley AreaAyr Waterloo AreaAyton Bluewater AreaAzilda Rainbow AreaBaden Waterloo AreaBalmertown Kenora AreaBaltimore Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaBancroft Hastings-Limestone AreaBarrie BarrieBarry’s Bay Renfrew County AreaBath Hastings-Limestone AreaBattersea Hastings-Limestone AreaBeachburg Renfrew County AreaBeamsville Niagara AreaBeaverton Durham AreaBeeton Simcoe County AreaBelfountain Peel AreaBelle River Greater Essex AreaBelle Rivière Greater Essex AreaBelleville Hastings-Limestone AreaBelmont Thames Valley AreaBerwick Upper Canada AreaBinbrook Hamilton-Wentworth AreaBlackstock Durham AreaBlenheim Lambton Kent AreaBlind River Algoma AreaBobcaygeon Trillium Lakelands AreaBolton Peel Area

Borden Simcoe County AreaBothwell Lambton Kent AreaBourget Upper Canada AreaBowmanville Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaBracebridge Trillium Lakelands AreaBradford Simcoe County AreaBrampton Peel AreaBrantford BrantfordBrechin Simcoe County AreaBreslau Waterloo AreaBridgenorth Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaBrigden Lambton Kent AreaBright’s Grove Lambton Kent AreaBrighton Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaBrockville Upper Canada AreaBrooklin Durham AreaBrucefield Avon Maitland AreaBuckhorn Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaBurford Grand Erie AreaBurk’s Falls Near North AreaBurlington Halton AreaButtonville York AreaCaistor Centre Niagara AreaCaledon Peel AreaCaledon East Peel AreaCaledon Village Peel AreaCaledonia Grand Erie AreaCallander Near North AreaCambridge Waterloo AreaCameron Trillium Lakelands AreaCamlachie Lambton Kent AreaCampbellford Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaCampbellville Halton AreaCannington Durham AreaCapreol Rainbow AreaCarleton Place Upper Canada AreaCarlisle Hamilton-Wentworth AreaCarp OttawaCarpion OttawaCasselman Upper Canada AreaCastleton Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaCavan Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaCayuga Grand Erie AreaCentreville Hastings-Limestone AreaChalk River Renfrew County AreaChapleau Algoma AreaChatham Lambton Kent AreaChatsworth Bluewater AreaChelmsford Rainbow AreaChepstow Bluewater AreaCherry Valley Hastings-Limestone AreaChesley Bluewater AreaChesterville Upper Canada AreaClarence Creek Upper Canada AreaClinton Avon Maitland AreaCloyne Hastings-Limestone AreaCobden Renfrew County Area



Coboconk Trillium Lakelands AreaCobourg Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaCochrane Ontario North East AreaColborne Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaColdwater Simcoe County AreaCollingwood Simcoe County AreaComber Greater Essex AreaConcord York AreaConestogo Waterloo AreaConiston Rainbow AreaCookstown Simcoe County AreaCopetown Hamilton-Wentworth AreaCopper Cliff Rainbow AreaCorbeil Near North AreaCorbyville Hastings-Limestone AreaCornwall Upper Canada AreaCorunna Lambton Kent AreaCottam Greater Essex AreaCourtice Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaCourtland Grand Erie AreaCrediton Avon Maitland AreaCreemore Simcoe County AreaCrysler Simcoe County AreaCrystal Beach Niagara AreaCumberland OttawaCumberland Beach Simcoe County AreaDalkeith Upper Canada AreaDashwood Avon Maitland AreaDeep River Renfrew County AreaDeer Lake Kenora AreaDelaware Thames Valley AreaDelhi Grand Erie AreaDesbarats Algoma AreaDeseronto Hastings-Limestone AreaDevlin Kenora AreaDorchester Thames Valley AreaDouglas Renfrew County AreaDouro Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaDowling Rainbow AreaDrayton Upper Grand AreaDresden Lambton Kent AreaDrumbo Thames Valley AreaDryden Kenora AreaDublin Avon Maitland AreaDundalk Avon Maitland AreaDundas Hamilton-Wentworth AreaDunnville Grand Erie AreaDunsford Trillium Lakelands AreaDurham Bluewater AreaDutton Thames Valley AreaDwight Trillium Lakelands AreaEarlton Ontario North East AreaEast Garafraxa Upper Grand AreaEast Gwillimbury York AreaEcho Bay Algoma AreaEganville Renfrew County AreaEgbert Simcoe County Area

Elgin Upper Canada AreaElginburg Hastings-Limestone AreaElliot Lake Algoma AreaElmira Waterloo AreaElmvale Simcoe County AreaElora Upper Grand AreaEmbro Thames Valley AreaEmbrun Upper Canada AreaEmeryville Greater Essex AreaEmo Kenora AreaEmsdale Near North AreaEnglehart Ontario North East AreaEnniskillen Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaEnnismore Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaErin Upper Grand AreaEspanola Rainbow AreaEssex Greater Essex AreaEthel Avon Maitland AreaEverett Simcoe County AreaExeter Avon Maitland AreaFenelon Falls Trillium Lakelands AreaFenwick Niagara AreaFergus Upper Grand AreaFisherville Grand Erie AreaFlesherton Bluewater AreaFonthill Niagara AreaForest Lambton Kent AreaFormosa Bluewater AreaFort Erie Niagara AreaFort Frances Kenora AreaFoxboro Hastings-Limestone AreaFrankford Hastings-Limestone AreaGananoque Upper Canada AreaGarson Rainbow AreaGeorgetown Halton AreaGlen Morris Grand Erie AreaGlenburnie Hastings-Limestone AreaGlencoe Thames Valley AreaGloucester OttawaGoderich Avon Maitland AreaGoodwood Durham AreaGore Bay Rainbow AreaGores Landing Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaGorrie Avon Maitland AreaGoulais River Algoma AreaGrafton Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaGrand Bend Lambton Kent AreaGrand Valley Upper Grand AreaGrande Pointe Lambton Kent AreaGravenhurst Trillium Lakelands AreaGreely OttawaGreenbank Durham AreaGreensville Hamilton-Wentworth AreaGreenwood Durham AreaGrimsby Niagara AreaGuelph Upper Grand AreaHagersville Grand Erie Area


Haileybury Ontario North East AreaHalton Hills Halton AreaHamilton Hamilton-Wentworth AreaHammond Upper Canada AreaHampton Upper Canada AreaHanmer Rainbow AreaHanover Bluewater AreaHarriston Upper Grand AreaHarrow Greater Essex AreaHarrowsmith Hastings-Limestone AreaHavelock Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaHawkesbury Upper Canada AreaHawkestone Simcoe County AreaHearst Simcoe County AreaHensall Avon Maitland AreaHepworth Bluewater AreaHickson Thames Valley AreaHillsburgh Upper Grand AreaHillsdale Simcoe County AreaHolland Centre Bluewater AreaHolland Landing York AreaHolstein Bluewater AreaHuntsville Trillium Lakelands AreaHuttonville Peel AreaIlderton Thames Valley AreaIngersoll Thames Valley AreaIngleside Upper Canada AreaInglewood Peel AreaInnerkip Thames Valley AreaInnisfil Simcoe County AreaIroquois Upper Canada AreaIroquois Falls Ontario North East AreaJarvis Grand Erie AreaJoyceville Hastings-Limestone AreaKakabeka Falls Lakehead AreaKanata OttawaKapuskasing Ontario North East AreaKars OttawaKasabonika Ontario North East AreaKeene Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaKeewatin Kenora AreaKemptville Upper Canada AreaKenilworth Upper Canada AreaKenora Kenora AreaKeswick York AreaKettleby York AreaKilbride Halton AreaKillaloe Renfrew County AreaKincardine Bluewater AreaKing City York AreaKingston KingstonKingsville Greater Essex AreaKintore Thames Valley AreaKirkfield Trillium Lakelands AreaKirkland Lake Ontario North East AreaKitchener KitchenerKleinburg York Area

Komoka Thames Valley AreaL’Orignal Upper Canada AreaLac Seul Kenora AreaLakefield Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaLanark Upper Canada AreaLangton Grand Erie AreaLansdowne Upper Canada AreaLaSalle Greater Essex AreaLeamington Greater Essex AreaLefroy Simcoe County AreaLimoges Upper Canada AreaLindsay Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaLinwood Waterloo AreaLion’s Head Bluewater AreaListowel Avon Maitland AreaLittle Britain Trillium Lakelands AreaLittle Current Rainbow AreaLively Rainbow AreaLombardy Upper Canada AreaLondesboro Avon Maitland AreaLondon LondonLong Sault Upper Canada AreaLoretto Simcoe County AreaLucan Thames Valley AreaLucknow Avon Maitland AreaLyn Upper Canada AreaM’Chigeeng Rainbow AreaMadoc Hastings-Limestone AreaMaidstone Greater Essex AreaMallorytown Upper Canada AreaManitowaning Rainbow AreaManotick OttawaMaple York AreaMarathon Superior-Greenstone AreaMarkdale Bluewater AreaMarkham York AreaMarmora Hastings-Limestone AreaMaryhill KitchenerMarysville KitchenerMassey Rainbow AreaMattawa Near North AreaMaxwell Bluewater AreaMcGregor Greater Essex AreaMerlin Lambton Kent AreaMerrickville Upper Canada AreaMetcalfe OttawaMidhurst Simcoe County AreaMidland Simcoe County AreaMildmay Bluewater AreaMillbrook Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaMilton Halton AreaMilverton Avon Maitland AreaMindemoya Rainbow AreaMinden Trillium Lakelands AreaMinesing Simcoe County AreaMississauga MississaugaMitchell Avon Maitland Area



Moorefield Upper Grand AreaMooretown Lambton Kent AreaMoose Creek Upper Canada AreaMoose Factory Ontario North East AreaMoosonee Ontario North East AreaMorrisburg Upper Canada AreaMount Forest Upper Grand AreaMount Hope Hamilton-Wentworth AreaMount Pleasant Grand Erie AreaMt. Brydges Thames Valley AreaMurillo Lakehead AreaNapanee Hastings-Limestone AreaNavan OttawaNepean OttawaNew Dundee Waterloo AreaNew Hamburg Waterloo AreaNew Liskeard Ontario North East AreaNew Lowell Simcoe County AreaNewcastle Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaNewmarket York AreaNewton Avon Maitland AreaNiagara Falls Niagara AreaNiagara-on-the-Lake Niagara AreaNipigon Lakehead AreaNobel Near North AreaNobleton York AreaNoëlville Rainbow AreaNorth Bay Near North AreaNorth Lancaster Upper Canada AreaNorth York Upper Canada AreaNorwich Thames Valley AreaNorwood Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaOakville Halton AreaOakwood Trillium Lakelands AreaOdessa Hastings-Limestone AreaOhsweken Grand Erie AreaOrangeville Upper Grand AreaOrillia Simcoe County AreaOrléans OttawaOro Station Simcoe County AreaOrono Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaOsgoode OttawaOshawa Durham AreaOttawa OttawaOwen Sound Bluewater AreaPain Court Lambton Kent AreaPalgrave Peel AreaPalmerston Upper Grand AreaParis Grand Erie AreaParkhill Thames Valley AreaParry Sound Near North AreaPefferlaw York AreaPembroke Renfrew County AreaPenetanguishene Simcoe County AreaPerth Upper Canada AreaPerth Road Hastings-Limestone AreaPetawawa Renfrew County Area

Peterborough Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaPetrolia Lambton Kent AreaPickering Durham AreaPicton Hastings-Limestone AreaPlantagenet Upper Canada AreaPlattsville Thames Valley AreaPoint Edward Lambton Kent AreaPointe-aux-Roches Greater Essex AreaPoplar Hill Kenora AreaPort Burwell Thames Valley AreaPort Carling Trillium Lakelands AreaPort Colborne Niagara AreaPort Dover Grand Erie AreaPort Elgin Bluewater AreaPort Hope Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaPort Lambton Lambton Kent AreaPort Perry Durham AreaPort Rowan Grand Erie AreaPort Stanley Thames Valley AreaPowassan Near North AreaPrescott Upper Canada AreaPrince Albert Durham AreaRainy River Kenora AreaRama Simcoe County AreaRed Lake Kenora AreaRedbridge Kenora AreaRenfrew Renfrew County AreaRichmond OttawaRichmond Hill York AreaRidgetown Lambton Kent AreaRidgeway Niagara AreaRipley Bluewater AreaRiver Canard Greater Essex AreaRockland Upper Canada AreaRockwood Upper Grand AreaRodney Thames Valley AreaRoseneath Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaRussell Upper Canada AreaSandford Durham AreaSandy Lake Kenora AreaSarnia Lambton Kent AreaSauble Beach Bluewater AreaSault Ste. Marie Algoma AreaSchomberg York AreaSchumacher Ontario North East AreaSeaforth Avon Maitland AreaSebringville Avon Maitland AreaSelby Hastings-Limestone AreaShakespeare Avon Maitland AreaShannonville Hastings-Limestone AreaShanty Bay Simcoe County AreaSharbot Lake Hastings-Limestone AreaSharon York AreaShelburne Upper Grand AreaSimcoe Grand Erie AreaSioux Lookout Kenora AreaSmith Falls Kenora Area



Smiths Falls Upper Canada AreaSmithville Niagara AreaSouth Mountain Upper Canada AreaSouth Porcupine Ontario North East AreaSouth River Near North AreaSouthampton Bluewater AreaSpencerville Upper Canada AreaSpringfield Thames Valley AreaSt Anns Niagara AreaSt Catharines St CatharinesSt Clair Beach Greater Essex AreaSt Clements Waterloo AreaSt Davids Niagara AreaSt George Grand Erie AreaSt Jacobs Waterloo AreaSt Marys Avon Maitland AreaSt Pauls Avon Maitland AreaSt Thomas Thames Valley AreaSt-Isidore Upper Canada AreaSt. Andrew’s West Upper Canada AreaStayner Simcoe County AreaStevensville Niagara AreaStirling Hastings-Limestone AreaStittsville OttawaStoney Creek Hamilton-Wentworth AreaStoney Point Greater Essex AreaStouffville York AreaStraffordville Thames Valley AreaStratford Avon Maitland AreaStrathroy Thames Valley AreaSturgeon Falls Near North AreaSudbury Rainbow AreaSunderland Durham AreaSundridge Near North AreaSutton West York AreaSydenham Hastings-Limestone AreaTamworth Hastings-Limestone AreaTara Bluewater AreaTavistock Thames Valley AreaTecumseh Greater Essex AreaTeeterville Grand Erie AreaThamesford Thames Valley AreaThamesville Lambton Kent AreaThedford Lambton Kent AreaThessalon Algoma AreaThornbury Bluewater AreaThorndale Thames Valley AreaThornhill York AreaThorold Niagara AreaThunder Bay Lakehead AreaTilbury Lambton Kent AreaTillsonburg Thames Valley AreaTimmins Ontario North East Area

Toledo Upper Canada AreaToronto TorontoTottenham Simcoe County AreaTrenton Hastings-Limestone AreaTweed Hastings-Limestone AreaTyendinaga Territory Hastings-Limestone AreaUnionville York AreaUtterson Trillium Lakelands AreaUxbridge Durham AreaVal Caron Rainbow AreaVanier OttawaVankleek Hill Upper Canada AreaVaughan York AreaVerner Near North AreaVerona Hastings-Limestone AreaVictoria Harbour Simcoe County AreaVineland Niagara AreaWainfleet Niagara AreaWalkerton Bluewater AreaWallaceburg Lambton Kent AreaWarkworth Kawartha Pine Ridge AreaWarminster Simcoe County AreaWasaga Beach Simcoe County AreaWashago Simcoe County AreaWaterdown Hamilton-Wentworth AreaWaterford Grand Erie AreaWaterloo Waterloo AreaWatford Lambton Kent AreaWawa Algoma AreaWebequie Ontario North East AreaWelland Niagara AreaWellesley Waterloo AreaWellington Hastings-Limestone AreaWendover Upper Canada AreaWest Lorne Thames Valley AreaWestbrook Hastings-Limestone AreaWestport Upper Canada AreaWheatley Lambton Kent AreaWhitby Durham AreaWiarton Bluewater AreaWilliamstown Upper Canada AreaWinchester Upper Canada AreaWindsor Greater Essex AreaWingham Avon Maitland AreaWinona Hamilton-Wentworth AreaWoodbridge York AreaWoodlawn OttawaWoodslee Greater Essex AreaWoodstock Thames Valley AreaWoodville Trillium Lakelands AreaWyevale Simcoe County AreaWyoming Simcoe County AreaZurich Avon Maitland Area



Algoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189

Avon Maitland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96

Barrie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191

Bluewater . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194

Brantford . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99

Durham . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Grand Erie . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101

Greater Essex . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104

Halton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

Hamilton-Wentworth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111

Hastings-Limestone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159

Kawartha Pine Ridge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196

Kenora . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202

Kingston . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163

Kitchener . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119

Lakehead . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204

Lambton Kent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122

London . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128

Mississauga . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36

Near North . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207

Niagara . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134

Ontario North East . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209

Ottawa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165

Peel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

Rainbow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211

Renfrew County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179

Simcoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215

St Catharines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140

Superior-Greenstone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221

Thames Valley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142

Toronto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

Trillium Lakelands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221

Upper Canada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181

Upper Grand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147

Waterloo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153

York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

Index of geographical areasGeographical area Page Geographical area Page


DuRHAmAdelaide Mclaughlin PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 34ESL (%) 2.9 Special needs (%) 50Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1540/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.9 2.8 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 2.9 2.7 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.2 3.1 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.1 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 F 0.1 E F 0.3 n/a Math n/a M 0.3 F 0.2 F 0.1 F 0.3 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 26.8 18.9 30.4 26.7 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 13.8 1.9 9.0 11.3 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.5 7.3 6.3 6.1 n/a

Alexander Graham Bell PublicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 60ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 18.3Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1936/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.8 3.0 2.5 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.5 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.0 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 n/a Math n/a 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.2 F 0.1 n/a Math n/a M 0.3 F 0.3 M 0.6 M 0.5 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 22.1 28.5 27.9 35.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 1.9 0.0 6.7 5.2 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.1 6.4 6.3 5.5 n/a

Altona Forest PublicPickering Gr 6 enrolment: 38ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 21.1Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 301/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.8 3.0 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.9 3.0 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.3 3.3 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.3 3.4 3.4 n/a Math n/a 2.9 3.0 3.2 2.9 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.3 F 0.3 E F 0.2 n/a Math n/a E F 0.5 M 0.2 M 0.3 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 28.3 19.6 14.1 11.3 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 2.1 0.0 1.4 6.1 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.3 7.2 8.6 8.0 n/a

Antonine Maillet PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 17ESL (%) n/a Special needs (%) 5.9Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 60/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 3.0 2.6 3.2 n/a Math n/a 2.7 3.0 2.8 3.4 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.6 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.6 n/a Math n/a 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.8 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 16.1 17.8 19.1 6.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 6.5 0.0 0.0 4.7 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.2 6.4 6.3 9.1 n/a

Applecroft PublicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 27ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 7.4Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1683/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 3.0 2.8 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.6 n/a Math n/a 2.1 2.8 2.5 2.3 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.7 3.2 3.0 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.5 3.2 3.1 3.1 n/a Math n/a 1.8 2.8 2.4 2.8 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a E F 0.1 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.2 M 0.1 M 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 49.3 16.9 36.4 31.0 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 2.0 4.1 1.5 1.7 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 3.2 7.9 5.9 5.9 n/a

Bayview Heights PublicPickering Gr 6 enrolment: 28ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 21.4Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2102/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.6 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 2.8 2.3 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.7 2.1 2.3 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.8 3.0 2.8 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.9 2.7 3.1 n/a Math n/a 2.0 2.3 2.2 2.1 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 F 0.2 F 0.5 M 0.1 n/a Math n/a F 0.3 M 0.3 F 0.7 M 0.4 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 40.3 29.3 49.0 36.8 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 3.1 0.0 1.5 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 4.9 5.9 2.9 5.2 n/a

Beau Valley PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 27ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 37Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2578/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.8 3.1 2.3 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.3 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.0 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.8 2.7 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.8 2.6 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.0 1.6 2.1 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 M 0.2 F 0.4 F 0.4 n/a Math n/a E M 0.7 F 0.1 F 0.6 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 32.2 36.3 47.4 40.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 3.2 4.8 0.0 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.0 4.8 4.2 4.2 n/a

Beaverton PublicBeaverton Gr 6 enrolment: 14ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 50Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1936/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 n/a 3.3 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 n/a 3.0 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.3 n/a 3.1 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 n/a 3.0 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 n/a 3.1 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.1 n/a 2.4 1.9 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 37.3 n/a 15.2 35.6 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 n/a 0.0 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 5.3 n/a 7.9 5.5 n/a

Bellwood PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 47ESL (%) 17 Special needs (%) 21.3Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1821/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.6 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.4 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 n/a Math n/a 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.3 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.2 F 0.4 F 0.4 M 0.2 n/a Math n/a F 0.2 F 0.2 F 0.3 M 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 19.3 35.2 34.9 32.7 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.5 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.9 5.3 5.1 5.7 n/a

Blair Ridge PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 91ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 20.9Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1277/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.2 3.1 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.8 n/a Math n/a 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.8 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.4 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.2 E F 0.2 F 0.3 n/a Math n/a F 0.1 M 0.5 F 0.1 E n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 19.5 12.1 16.8 28.1 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.7 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.4 7.6 7.6 6.5 n/a

Blessed Pope John Paull II CatholicBrooklin Gr 6 enrolment: 43ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 20.9Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 893/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.8 2.5 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.8 2.5 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.0 2.9 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.2 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.4 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a E F 0.1 E F 0.2 n/a Math n/a M 0.1 F 0.3 M 0.7 E n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 28.0 22.7 29.9 24.1 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.6 6.7 5.8 7.0 n/a

Bobby Orr PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 25ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 36Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2540/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 n/a Writing n/a 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.5 n/a Math n/a 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 2.6 2.8 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.3 1.6 2.0 1.9 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.3 n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a F 0.4 n/a n/a n/a n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 38.6 50.4 44.2 41.8 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 5.4 4.7 8.0 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 4.9 2.9 4.0 4.3 n/a

Greater Toronto

About the Trend column:As the result of a job action by the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario, no grade 3 or grade 6 province-wide tests were administered in the public schools during the 2014/2015 school year. Since the results from these tests are used in the calculation of five-year trends, no improvement analysis is currently available.


Bolton C Falby PublicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 60ESL (%) 8.3 Special needs (%) 21.7Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2102/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.9 2.6 2.6 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.6 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.7 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.0 2.3 2.5 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 F 0.2 E F 0.3 n/a Math n/a E M 0.1 M 0.2 F 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 26.5 34.5 39.3 35.0 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 2.6 7.0 5.1 4.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.5 5.6 5.3 5.2 n/a

Brooklin Village PublicBrooklin Gr 6 enrolment: 83ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 16.9Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1409/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.2 3.1 2.7 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.5 n/a Math n/a 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.2 n/a Math n/a 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.4 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a E F 0.1 F 0.1 F 0.3 n/a Math n/a F 0.4 E E F 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 19.9 16.1 21.7 31.4 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 4.3 2.5 0.9 3.1 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.4 7.9 7.4 6.3 n/a

Brother Andre CatholicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 34ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 11.8Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 688/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 2.8 3.0 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 3.2 2.9 3.1 3.4 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.2 2.2 2.6 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 F 0.1 n/a M 0.2 n/a Math n/a E M 0.2 n/a M 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 22.8 22.2 23.2 20.6 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.0 1.7 1.1 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.5 6.9 6.9 7.3 n/a

C E Broughton PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 27ESL (%) 3.7 Special needs (%) 33.3Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1871/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.5 2.5 3.3 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.4 2.9 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.3 2.3 3.0 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.0 3.1 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.3 2.0 2.4 2.0 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.2 F 0.6 F 0.1 n/a n/a Math n/a F 0.6 E E n/a n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 42.9 46.7 21.9 32.7 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 1.7 3.5 1.6 1.9 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 4.5 4.0 7.4 5.6 n/a

Cadarackque PublicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 84ESL (%) 1.2 Special needs (%) 8.3Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 893/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.4 2.8 2.7 2.6 n/a Math n/a 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.5 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.9 3.2 3.3 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.5 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.4 F 0.3 F 0.1 F 0.1 n/a Math n/a F 0.4 F 0.3 M 0.1 M 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 32.8 26.4 28.9 24.9 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.9 0.0 0.0 3.4 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 5.6 6.2 6.7 7.0 n/a

Captain Michael VandenBos PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 63ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 4.8Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 688/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 2.6 3.1 2.6 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.5 3.0 2.6 n/a Math n/a 3.3 2.7 3.0 2.6 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.4 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.3 2.6 2.7 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.2 F 0.1 F 0.2 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a E M 0.1 F 0.2 E n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 24.4 33.9 17.9 25.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 2.2 3.3 0.9 1.9 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.1 6.0 7.5 7.3 n/a

Carruthers Creek PublicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 77ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 20.8Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 893/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.1 2.9 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.8 3.0 2.8 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.2 3.0 3.1 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.6 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a E F 0.1 F 0.2 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a M 0.1 F 0.1 M 0.1 F 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 21.9 18.5 23.3 23.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 3.2 0.6 1.3 1.9 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.2 7.6 6.7 7.0 n/a

Cartwright Central PublicBlackstock Gr 6 enrolment: 22ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 31.8Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2578/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 3.0 3.0 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.8 2.4 2.0 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.7 3.0 2.6 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.6 3.0 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.1 1.9 2.4 2.0 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.2 M 0.1 F 0.2 n/a n/a Math n/a M 0.3 M 0.8 M 0.3 n/a n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 38.4 36.0 26.7 44.0 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 5.1 4.8 6.2 4.2 n/a

Chris Hadfield PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 88ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 9.1Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 577/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.2 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.8 2.4 2.9 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.3 F 0.1 F 0.1 F 0.1 n/a Math n/a M 0.1 M 0.2 F 0.2 M 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 19.7 20.3 27.2 18.7 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 2.2 0.0 3.8 1.1 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.0 7.2 6.4 7.5 n/a

Clara Hughes PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 62ESL (%) 1.6 Special needs (%) 41.9Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2364/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.2 3.5 3.7 2.5 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.9 3.1 2.5 n/a Math n/a 2.9 3.1 3.3 2.3 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.1 3.2 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.0 3.2 2.7 n/a Math n/a 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.2 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a M 0.1 M 0.1 F 0.1 E n/a Math n/a F 0.1 M 0.1 F 0.1 E n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 10.4 9.0 4.3 46.4 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 12.4 2.6 1.4 2.3 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 8.1 8.4 9.3 4.7 n/a

College Hill PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 29ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 44.8Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1409/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.9 2.9 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.6 3.1 2.5 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.7 2.9 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.1 2.2 3.0 2.7 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.1 n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a M 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 39.0 30.0 14.5 29.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 6.0 2.4 2.1 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 4.9 5.6 7.7 6.3 n/a

Colonel J E Farewell PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 43ESL (%) 9.3 Special needs (%) 30.2Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 513/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.3 3.1 3.3 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 n/a Math n/a 3.1 3.2 2.9 3.0 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 3.3 3.1 3.3 3.3 n/a Math n/a 2.9 2.5 3.1 2.9 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a E E F 0.3 M 0.2 n/a Math n/a E M 0.3 F 0.3 M 0.7 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 11.3 13.6 14.6 15.6 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 3.1 3.8 2.6 6.5 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 8.4 8.1 7.6 7.6 n/a

Coronation PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 40ESL (%) 2.5 Special needs (%) 32.5Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1683/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.5 3.1 3.0 2.7 n/a Writing n/a 2.5 2.8 2.7 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.2 2.9 2.6 2.5 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.0 3.1 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.9 3.2 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.7 2.4 2.6 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.3 E F 0.4 M 0.2 n/a Math n/a F 0.1 M 0.2 F 0.3 M 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 34.4 20.9 25.7 32.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 2.1 0.9 2.5 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 5.7 7.3 6.2 5.9 n/a

Corpus-Christi CatholicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 41ESL (%) n/a Special needs (%) 12.2Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1338/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.4 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.1 3.4 3.0 n/a Math n/a 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.3 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.3 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.1 n/a Math n/a 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.4 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a F 0.1 F 0.4 F 0.4 n/a Math n/a n/a M 0.4 F 0.8 F 0.5 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 11.7 7.8 8.7 11.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 2.7 2.3 1.3 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.8 6.9 6.4 6.4 n/a

da Vinci PublicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 92ESL (%) 1.1 Special needs (%) 8.7Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 766/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.2 3.0 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.0 2.9 2.8 n/a Math n/a 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.8 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.1 2.9 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.3 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.7 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a M 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.2 E n/a Math n/a E F 0.1 E M 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 20.5 18.3 20.0 24.8 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 1.1 1.2 1.1 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.6 7.5 7.3 7.2 n/a


David Bouchard PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 56ESL (%) 7.1 Special needs (%) 32.1Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2364/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.7 2.1 2.2 1.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.4 2.3 1.9 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.5 2.2 2.2 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.7 2.4 2.8 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.4 2.9 3.0 n/a Math n/a 1.9 1.8 2.4 2.4 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.5 F 0.3 F 0.5 F 0.1 n/a Math n/a F 0.3 F 0.3 F 0.5 M 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 43.3 59.0 46.6 44.0 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 1.1 1.0 5.3 2.4 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 4.1 2.5 3.7 4.7 n/a

Dr C F Cannon PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 40ESL (%) 5 Special needs (%) 52.5Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2540/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.6 2.9 2.7 n/a Writing n/a 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.2 2.5 2.8 2.4 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.6 2.9 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8 n/a Math n/a 1.8 1.9 2.3 1.9 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 F 0.3 E F 0.5 n/a Math n/a E F 0.2 M 0.4 F 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 55.7 43.7 31.1 42.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 3.6 4.2 5.9 4.3 n/a

Dr Robert Thornton PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 38ESL (%) 2.6 Special needs (%) 15.8Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1991/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.8 2.9 2.4 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.8 2.8 3.0 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.9 3.1 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.2 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.3 E n/a M 0.1 n/a Math n/a F 0.4 M 0.2 n/a M 0.6 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 25.5 26.3 30.0 35.0 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 4.2 1.5 2.0 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 5.9 6.6 6.0 5.4 n/a

Dr Roberta Bondar PublicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 27ESL (%) 3.7 Special needs (%) 18.5Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2413/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.5 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.2 n/a Math n/a 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.1 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.9 3.0 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.8 3.3 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.1 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.3 F 0.2 F 0.3 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a F 0.1 F 0.2 E F 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 34.2 34.6 35.6 44.9 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 2.6 3.6 0.0 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 5.4 5.4 5.9 4.6 n/a

Dr S J Phillips PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 40ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 27.5Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1756/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.6 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.3 3.3 3.2 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.2 3.4 3.1 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.7 2.6 1.9 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a E F 0.1 F 0.2 E n/a Math n/a E F 0.2 F 0.2 M 0.4 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 15.3 14.4 16.9 32.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 1.5 2.3 0.0 2.4 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 8.3 8.2 7.6 5.8 n/a

Duffin's Bay PublicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 26ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 11.5Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2102/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.2 2.8 2.8 2.7 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.8 2.8 2.3 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.3 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.0 2.8 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 3.1 2.9 3.2 n/a Math n/a 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.3 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 n/a F 0.4 n/a n/a Math n/a F 0.2 n/a F 0.4 n/a n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 26.1 24.4 33.3 39.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 3.2 0.0 0.0 2.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.6 6.5 4.9 5.2 n/a

Eagle Ridge PublicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 64ESL (%) 3.1 Special needs (%) 12.5Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 688/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.0 2.9 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.9 2.9 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.2 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.6 3.0 2.6 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 F 0.1 F 0.1 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a M 0.3 M 0.2 F 0.1 E n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 22.7 21.1 17.3 20.7 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 2.9 4.2 10.0 4.5 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.2 7.2 7.5 7.3 n/a

Earl A Fairman PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 35ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 20Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 169/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.3 3.2 3.2 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.8 2.9 2.8 n/a Math n/a 3.0 3.2 2.8 2.8 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.1 3.3 3.3 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.3 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.5 3.1 3.1 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a E E n/a M 0.1 n/a Math n/a F 0.3 M 0.1 n/a E n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 8.1 14.8 14.4 11.8 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 8.1 7.9 8.4 8.4 n/a

Elizabeth B Phin PublicPickering Gr 6 enrolment: 35ESL (%) 5.7 Special needs (%) 25.7Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 83/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.1 n/a Math n/a 3.0 3.3 3.0 3.2 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.4 3.5 3.4 n/a Math n/a 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.8 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.5 F 0.1 F 0.1 F 0.1 n/a Math n/a M 0.2 F 0.5 E M 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 12.3 7.8 11.8 11.3 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 1.8 0.0 1.4 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.7 8.9 9.1 8.9 n/a

Fairport Beach PublicPickering Gr 6 enrolment: 19ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 42.1Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2364/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.5 1.9 2.7 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.5 1.7 2.8 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 2.5 2.8 2.6 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.4 2.9 2.4 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.1 1.9 2.0 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 38.0 67.5 38.3 38.9 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 16.3 11.6 1.7 0.9 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 5.2 0.8 4.8 4.7 n/a

Fallingbrook PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 41ESL (%) 2.4 Special needs (%) 22Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 97/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.9 3.0 2.9 n/a Math n/a 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.2 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.3 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 3.2 3.3 3.5 n/a Math n/a 2.5 3.1 3.2 3.2 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.2 F 0.1 F 0.1 E n/a Math n/a F 0.3 M 0.3 E M 0.3 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 16.7 12.9 3.9 10.1 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 4.3 2.1 1.4 3.3 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.3 8.0 9.3 8.8 n/a

Father Joseph Venini CatholicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 41ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 22Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1756/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.0 2.4 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.9 2.3 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.9 3.1 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.0 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.5 F 0.7 F 0.1 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a F 0.5 F 0.4 M 0.3 M 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 26.5 23.3 42.3 32.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.5 1.6 1.6 0.7 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 5.7 5.6 4.7 5.8 n/a

Forest View PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 58ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 39.7Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1871/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.6 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.6 2.8 2.5 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.1 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.5 F 0.2 F 0.3 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a F 0.6 E F 0.6 M 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 31.5 39.7 30.5 35.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.9 4.3 1.2 3.2 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.6 n/a

Fr Fenelon CatholicPickering Gr 6 enrolment: 56ESL (%) 1.8 Special needs (%) 17.9Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1119/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.8 2.5 3.0 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 2.5 2.8 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.6 2.3 2.7 2.5 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.1 n/a Math n/a 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.4 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.2 F 0.2 E F 0.2 n/a Math n/a E M 0.2 M 0.3 F 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 28.1 30.5 21.0 24.9 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 2.1 1.9 0.0 3.3 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.4 5.7 7.0 6.7 n/a

Gandatsetiagon PublicPickering Gr 6 enrolment: 58ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 10.3Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 131/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.4 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 n/a Math n/a 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.3 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.2 3.3 3.3 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.8 2.9 3.0 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.2 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a M 0.1 E F 0.2 F 0.3 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 15.4 12.5 13.1 9.4 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.7 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 8.2 8.3 8.0 8.6 n/a


Glen Dhu PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 61ESL (%) 3.3 Special needs (%) 26.2Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1756/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.7 3.0 2.9 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.9 2.7 2.9 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.8 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.8 3.1 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.3 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.4 F 0.2 F 0.4 M 0.1 n/a Math n/a F 0.2 M 0.3 F 0.1 M 0.4 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 24.8 27.5 26.3 31.1 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 2.5 4.2 2.1 2.4 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.2 6.2 6.4 5.8 n/a

Glen Street PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 25ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 44Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 2678/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.8 2.4 2.5 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.5 1.9 2.4 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.5 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.5 n/a Math n/a 1.7 1.9 1.6 1.8 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.4 F 0.2 F 0.2 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a F 0.3 F 0.1 E M 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 42.4 41.0 62.9 50.0 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 4.2 4.8 2.7 3.9 n/a

Glengrove PublicPickering Gr 6 enrolment: 32ESL (%) 25 Special needs (%) 25Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1821/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 3.0 2.7 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.9 2.8 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.5 2.9 2.8 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.2 2.2 1.9 2.0 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a E F 0.3 F 0.6 F 0.2 n/a Math n/a M 0.6 F 0.1 F 0.4 M 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 40.4 25.3 34.4 34.4 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 1.6 2.0 5.8 3.2 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 4.6 6.5 4.9 5.7 n/a

Good Shepherd CatholicPort Perry Gr 6 enrolment: 18ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 38.9Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1756/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a n/a 3.0 2.8 2.9 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.9 2.5 2.8 n/a Math n/a n/a 2.7 2.6 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a n/a 2.6 2.4 2.7 n/a Writing n/a n/a 2.8 2.4 2.9 n/a Math n/a n/a 1.9 1.5 2.2 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aTests below standard (%) n/a n/a 34.4 55.9 29.6 n/aTests not written (%) n/a n/a 0.8 5.1 7.7 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a n/a 5.1 2.4 5.8 n/a

Goodwood PublicGoodwood Gr 6 enrolment: 24ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 12.5Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 893/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.2 3.0 3.3 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.8 3.1 3.0 n/a Math n/a 3.3 2.8 2.6 2.9 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.2 2.9 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.1 3.0 3.1 n/a Math n/a 2.3 2.5 2.2 2.5 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.6 n/a n/a F 0.5 n/a Math n/a F 1.0 n/a n/a F 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 23.3 20.5 24.5 18.1 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 5.6 7.5 6.9 7.0 n/a

Gordon B Attersley PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 31ESL (%) 12.9 Special needs (%) 19.4Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1338/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.6 2.9 2.7 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.6 2.7 2.6 3.2 n/a Math n/a 1.9 2.0 1.8 2.5 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.6 M 0.2 F 0.2 F 0.3 n/a Math n/a F 0.4 E F 0.5 F 0.3 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 45.2 44.7 47.6 25.5 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 3.8 0.0 2.6 1.4 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 3.5 4.6 3.9 6.4 n/a

Greenbank/Epsom PublicGreenbank Gr 6 enrolment: 21ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 23.8Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1277/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.0 3.3 3.3 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 3.0 3.1 2.9 n/a Math n/a 3.2 2.9 3.3 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.1 2.9 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 3.1 2.9 3.1 n/a Math n/a 2.6 3.0 2.3 2.1 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a E n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a F 0.2 n/a n/a n/a n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 18.4 18.8 15.7 28.8 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.5 7.9 7.8 6.5 n/a

Harmony Heights PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 34ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 41.2Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1617/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.6 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.9 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 2.6 2.9 3.0 n/a Math n/a 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.1 F 0.2 F 0.1 F 0.3 n/a Math n/a M 0.3 M 0.3 F 0.5 E n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 37.6 36.5 26.7 30.4 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 4.5 6.0 4.4 5.1 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 5.2 5.0 6.1 6.0 n/a

Highbush PublicPickering Gr 6 enrolment: 58ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 19Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 688/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.3 3.4 3.1 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.8 n/a Math n/a 3.1 3.1 2.8 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 3.1 3.1 3.2 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.9 2.6 3.0 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.2 F 0.1 E F 0.2 n/a Math n/a F 0.1 F 0.2 M 0.3 M 0.3 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 15.3 13.0 18.7 16.7 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.0 1.3 3.7 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 8.0 8.0 7.3 7.3 n/a

Islamic Foundation PrivateAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 13ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 0.0Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.5 n/a Writing n/a 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.3 n/a Math n/a 3.1 3.7 3.9 3.4 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.5 n/a Writing n/a 3.5 3.8 3.9 3.8 n/a Math n/a 3.3 3.1 3.8 3.6 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Math n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 2.2 1.0 0.0 0.0 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 n/a

Jack Miner PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 40ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 20Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 228/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.4 2.9 3.0 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.0 n/a Math n/a 3.0 2.9 2.9 3.0 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.3 3.0 3.1 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 3.2 2.9 3.3 3.3 n/a Math n/a 2.9 2.6 2.9 3.2 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.2 M 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.3 n/a Math n/a M 0.2 M 0.3 E M 0.3 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 12.0 25.8 17.8 10.4 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 4.4 4.3 4.3 5.6 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 8.4 6.5 7.6 8.2 n/a

Jean-Paul II CatholicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 41ESL (%) n/a Special needs (%) 19.5Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1683/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 n/a Math n/a 3.1 3.0 3.1 3.1 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.5 3.3 3.4 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 3.4 3.2 3.1 2.7 n/a Math n/a 3.6 3.6 3.3 3.1 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.6 F 0.2 F 0.3 M 0.1 n/a Math n/a F 0.2 M 0.2 F 0.1 M 0.2 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 6.5 9.8 12.6 18.6 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.2 7.2 7.1 5.9 n/a

John Dryden PublicWhitby Gr 6 enrolment: 77ESL (%) 1.3 Special needs (%) 10.4Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 346/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 3.1 3.0 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.7 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.3 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 3.2 3.2 3.3 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.6 2.6 3.1 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.3 E E F 0.3 n/a Math n/a F 0.1 M 0.3 M 0.1 E n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 26.9 20.0 27.9 17.1 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.3 7.4 7.0 7.9 n/a

John XXIII CatholicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 26ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 11.5Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1119/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.0 2.8 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.9 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.8 3.0 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.5 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a E n/a n/a F 0.3 n/a Math n/a M 0.3 n/a n/a F 0.3 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 25.3 29.3 24.6 22.7 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.6 5.9 6.4 6.7 n/a

Joseph Gould PublicUxbridge Gr 6 enrolment: 60ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 20Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 392/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 2.9 3.1 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.8 3.0 2.7 3.0 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.3 n/a Math n/a 3.0 2.4 2.5 2.8 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a E F 0.3 F 0.3 M 0.1 n/a Math n/a M 0.1 M 0.2 F 0.1 M 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 19.7 28.0 25.1 17.0 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 1.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 7.5 6.2 6.6 7.8 n/a


Kedron PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 34ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 5.9Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 301/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.3 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 n/a Math n/a 2.8 3.1 3.1 3.2 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.2 3.2 3.1 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 3.0 3.1 3.2 n/a Math n/a 2.5 2.9 2.7 2.9 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.3 M 0.1 F 0.3 F 0.3 n/a Math n/a M 0.1 M 0.2 F 0.3 F 0.3 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 23.2 14.2 18.7 10.1 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 8.2 7.3 0.9 1.6 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.6 7.8 7.2 8.0 n/a

Lakeside PublicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 30ESL (%) 3.3 Special needs (%) 33.3Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1048/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.8 3.2 3.0 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.7 n/a Math n/a 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.9 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.2 n/a Math n/a 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.6 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a F 0.2 F 0.3 E F 0.4 n/a Math n/a F 0.4 F 0.6 E F 0.1 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 24.0 16.9 16.9 21.8 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 7.2 0.0 4.1 1.7 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 6.1 6.9 7.7 6.8 n/a

Lakewoods PublicOshawa Gr 6 enrolment: 29ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 44.8Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 1409/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.4 2.4 3.2 3.0 n/a Writing n/a 2.4 2.5 3.0 3.0 n/a Math n/a 2.4 2.1 2.9 2.8 n/aGr 6 avg. level: Reading n/a 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.9 n/a Writing n/a 2.5 2.6 2.7 3.0 n/a Math n/a 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.0 n/aGender gap (level): Reading n/a M 0.1 F 0.1 n/a M 0.1 n/a Math n/a M 0.3 E n/a M 0.5 n/aTests below standard (%) n/a 57.1 56.0 28.0 26.2 n/aTests not written (%) n/a 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/aOverall rating out of 10 n/a 3.1 3.5 6.1 6.3 n/a

Lester B Pearson PublicAjax Gr 6 enrolment: 40ESL (%) 0.0 Special needs (%) 10Actual rating vs predicted based 2018-19 Last 5 Yearson parents' avg. inc. of $ n/a: n/a Rank: 577/3037 n/aAcademic Performance 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TrendGr 3 avg. level: Reading n/a 3.2 3.4 2.9 3.2 n/a Writing n/a 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.8 n/a Math n/a 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.7

Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2020...fre Inttute stue n Eucaton Polcy 7 Note that...

Documents

Transcript of Report Card on Ontario’s Elementary Schools 2020...fre Inttute stue n Eucaton Polcy 7 Note that...