REPORT ATTHEKORBl. IF. R. ,PERAK

I I

I I

F~'

-. J

I I

ITTO PROJECT: FD 1/5/90REV. Iru)

F\

r~',

REPORT

SOILSAND SOILPROPERTIES

.-,

LJ

ATTHEKORBl. IF. R. ,PERAK

On

APPENDIXl

I ^

SHAMSl. TDDINJUSOP

AJIkylAD HIJSNI MOHD HANIF

I, _.

I I

-

Department of SoilscieneFaculty of Agriculture

11niversitiPutra Malaysia43400 Serdang, Selamgor

Malaysia

1997

r'

I'I I

^

CONTENTS

Introduction

I,

The Project Area

Soil Sampling

Soil Type and Soil Properties

Fertility Status

Recommendation

Acknowledgements

Appendix

~ I

I,

2:1g^

I ^

3

3

L,

6

I,

I__

8

10

12

I ^

14

15

,-

I

,- ,

I

r-

I

r'

,.

A proposal was submitted to tlie International Tropical Timber Organization

(ITTO) to fund a project entitled Rehabilitation of Natural Forests, Korbu, F. R. , Perak.

The project was approved, and work started in 1993 under the supervision of Forestry

Department Peninsular Malaysia. A team of consultant from UpM was appointed to

implement and monitor the project. The project area is compartment 181, within the

Korbu Forest Reserve (Fig. I).

L_

I '

Introduction

I^

been encroached by shifting cultivators.

Part of the compartment 181 is logged-over forest, while some other areas have

considered as degraded natural forest. The aim of tlie project is to develop silvicultural

systems for rehabilitation of the degraded forest based o11 field studies. Data on soils and

soil properties would be useful for the successful implementation of the project.

I *I,

,

L ,'

Tliis report summarises soil characteristics ill the project area with a view of

evaluating their fertility in relation to the growth of forest species. Methodology of soil

sampling is fully described in tliis report.

At tliis point in time, the entire area is

Tile study area is in compartment 181, Korbu Forest Reserve, located about 50

kiri south-west of Kuala Kangsar, Perak. Plate I gives a pictorial account of the forest

species in tile area. The site is o11 the western foothills of the Main Raring, situated at

Project Area

3

r~~~'-- r~~~ , -,^

,--

N

,-- ,--..--

4:~

750

-^.

Figure I. Compartment 181, Korbu F. R: the study area

*

500

\*

I

\

. I

,\*

,

,--^

I

\

. I

.It. ",

\

I.,.

,*.L\\

* .

\

I,

,.-- ,

**...,..

\ ,

:.::\\,\

7<,' ',,, \

. : ~

.^--^-.

I

~::..\\ \.

\

.\,\\*

,--^

\

\

\

.\

\ \:\\\

\\. \

.\.*

\

Key :

\

\

\~.~\\ ,, ..\~..~\\ ,, ..\

~.~ ,.~~~ ~\ ,- -~.. , ,.\

- -,. .....,\,. ,. ....

~" If ...*' ~"''~'<.'J I, ',.- I

1' I .~'. , , ,,I~~~' + ,.,*..",' I' ,' ,

\.\\ .,-. ,F~.~,11 ,', '.' A ' ~_I

~~ I ,.' f'

". I, '\r, I ,,._.,',.. \, I I ." ---.., ~~--".

11 \\.. ::.~.

~,, ,,~ ...

."... \

.,.~-*.,,.** :. 750-.~.-> ~, \ ..\ \.

~"'~'~ " ," 0 400, -.,_.. I ,

O ~~~~~!14, '

: O I

' I

^.,

^ ^^~

. .

* *,,\ . ~

.. ,F' ~

Contour LLne

(in feet)

, -.

**

\

.\

River

\

*,\\

11

..

---.

.

\

, * ..\

\..

..

..

^^-.

-^~

! '\'

,

:

---

Road

500

SCA I Lop Boundry

1000

.. .. .... \~,,

..

~\\.\

,

Meters

,I.

,

,

I'

, -.:

f ~~:

an elevation of 150 - 300 in a. s. I. The general terrain of the area is considered

undulating to hilly, having an average slope of > 25% in some part of the area (Plate

2).

,-.

.^

I~

I '

I__

I-

Ll

.

- ". r*h

4

,,

The climate of the area is characterized by rainfall of high intensity and long

duration. The annual rainfallis more than 2000 min. There is a distinct dry period from

February to June. The average temperature is 27'C. Past record suggests that the soils

are highly 16ached, resulting in low nutrient contents and, therefore, of low fertility.

Thus, rehabilitation of the degraded forest can be difficult and costly.

Plate I.

A

L.

LI

:

A photograph showing luxuriant tropicalforest, within the Korbu Forest Reserve.

5

,--.

I~'

The study area is bordered by a land development scheme, whicli nave been

allocated to deserving settlers. Tile land in the scheme 11as been properly terraced for

planting rubber (Plate 3). Soil erosion is a major limitation for crop growtli as the slope

Is steep and the land is subjected to rainfall of higli intensity

I~'

I_

I

Two types of sampling were carried out: I) to get soil samples for determination

of soil series; and 2) to get samples for evaluating fertility status

Soil Sampling and Analysis

the dominant rock types were examined and identified at suitable stops, The area is

characterized by two major rock types, namely granite and shale. Sites for digging soil

pits for profile description were carefully chooseii to get representative samples. Based

on dominant rock type distribution, a profile was described in 11/6 soil developed from

granite and three profiles were described in the soils developed from shale (two on

normal shale and another o11 ferrugenous SIIale)

Soil Profile: The study area was traversed by a 4-wheel vehicle (Fig. I) where

I_

L

of officers from the Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia

collected from the various experimental plots mine project area

Soils for Fertilit These soils were sampled by workers under strict supervisioi\

The samples were

6

I'

I~ ~

.

r~'

,*?' .. .4e. *=;, ..*,.%?,. 5 .,..,! ,,, ._.,>

. . ,,.= , ~ , ... .=,:......,. .,.-, e:,--../-. ., *.,-. ,-, . ,'~ ~ ' ,,.,"'4*' *. ..-*--. ...,<,*.',

<9;. ,SI'!^;_ , ,* - r- " "'' '^.,;*,$$;.*,*-,?.. t, s*:;"*', I

Plate 2.

.

r

I.

,

A^. I41

~...

A photograph showing steep terrain and roadcutting, exposing shale undergoing weathering.

* ~

' !f, ,:,. t!*"

.@ .;,^,? ,.,~,

.,

.*

..

^^

I

^

$1;*Pi

..

Plate 3.

.

*

A photograph showing properly terracedland ready for rubber cultivation.

7

I

-,"

V

^

^

-\

I

\

I

Tile soils were brought back to the Department of Soil Science, Universiti Putra

Malaysia for analysis. Soil analyses for the soil profiles carried out include pH, basic

eXchangeable cations, eXchangeable A1, nitrogen, organic carbon, phosphorus, texture and

cation-eXchange capacity (NH, OAc). The data so obtained were used for determination

of soil series and soil fertility evaluation. Additional analyses for experimental plot

samples were carried out. The analyses were for determination of micronutrients (Fe,

Mn, Zn, Cu).

This section deals witli profile description and soil properties on site. The data

only represent properties of the soils in the profile and in the area close by.

Soil Type and Soil Properties (Appendix I)

fairly fiat topography (4-5% slope). The soil, developed from granite, is well-drained.

It is characterized by reddish brown sandy clay loam topsoil changing to clay at depth

below 91 cm. Soil structures are moderate, medium, subangular blocky and thin, patchy

Pedon I: PI SCA/D

cutans are present in the subsoil. The soil call be classified as an Ultisol. It is called Bt

Terniang Series according to the Malaysian Soil Classification System.

This profile is situated in the shifting cultivation area on

eXchangeable basic cations are low, untypical for soils under forest cover. Available P

pH (HD) is 5.45 in the topsoil, decreasing to 4.54 ill the B23t

is low and so are N and organic carbon. EXchangeable Alls low ill the topsoil, but the

value is moderately 11igli at depth. The CEC 11as a value typical for a soil under strongly

16achiiig environments.

8

In general,

.

.

.

I I

.

I

I IL,

II I

,

slope. The area is also under shifting cultivation. Tile soil, developed froin shale, is

well-drained. Patchy clay coatings are present o11 ped faces whicliineetthe requirement

of all argillic norizon. It is characterized by dark yellowisli brown, clay soil, witli

moderate, medium, subangular blocky structures tliroughout tlie profile. The soil is

classified as all Ultisol, and under the Malaysiaii Soil Classification System it is called

Bungor Series.

Pedoii 2: P2 SCA/A Tliis soil is situated on a nilly terrain, having 30 - 40%

The soilis acidic in reaction, naving pH(H, 0) of less than 5 in the topsoil, This

Is consistent witli the Inoderately 111gli eXchangeable A1 in that horizon. EXchangeable

Ca, Mg and K are moderately higli ill the topsoil, but low in the subsoil. Nitrogen is

moderately high, but organic carbon and available P are very low for soil under forest

cover

I I

^L

area is very hilly, with an average slope of 100%. The drainage condition is good. The

soil, whicli is characterized by the presence of argillic horizon, is developed on shale

The colour of the topsoilis yellowisli brown, changing to red at depth. The topsoilis

sandy clay, overly ing clay loam. The soil, whicli is named as 16rain Series, is also an.

'I

Pedoii3: P3 LOF

Ultisol.

The soil profile is situated in the logged-over forest. The

The pH of this soilis very low, naving values less than 4.5. This is due 10 11/6

presence of 11igli eXchangeable A1 ill the soil. The eXchangeable Ca and Mg are very

low, and so are organic carbon and available P

9

\

Catioii-exchanoe ca acit

nutrients against removal by crops, erosion or 16achiiig. It is affected by organic matter

content in the soil. The CEC across blocks is Inediuin to moderately low to medium,

ranging from 5.9 to 13.5 cmol (+)/kg soil. This is typical of logged-over forest soil as

opposed to cropped soil whicliis moderately low to low in rating. Minimal variation in

F1

I ,-

CEC

CEC exists between blocks.

J

CEC is a measure of tile capacity of a soil to retain

Macro-elements

Mucli of the total N is not available to the plant and only gives some idea of the nitrogen

that the plant can use. The InGall N value across blocks is about 0.2% whicli is rated as

medium. Cropped soils usually has < 0.2% total N. Total N and % C are related; the

NP K CaandM

higher the % C the better the soil will be in term of available N and soil structure.

Variation in % N and % C is minimal, althougli 4 plots nave extremely low value of <

The % C in the soils is very low as compared to undisturbed forest soil.

Total N was measured by the kjeldahl method.

0.6 % C.

The available P ranges from very low to moderately low. Samples from block

B (Nos. 8, 11 & 12) contain very low available P. The soils are deficient in P and

responds in varying degrees to P fertilizer

because of the presence of moderate to 11igli Fe content; Fe forIn a Fe-P fixation

complex. The available Ca and Mg contents are moderately 11igli. The requirement for

calciuin fertilizer is 1101 common for forest species. As some forest species (leguines) are

sensitive to low pH, addition of ground do loinatic limestone (GML) 1101 only increase the

soil pH but correct the Ca and Mg deficiency 10 a certain extent

I_

Another reason for P being deficient is

11

Micro-elements Fe Mii Zn and Cu

forest species planted o11 acid soil. The analysis showed that the soils nave adequate Fe

and Mn. Most of the soils in the blocks nave low to 1116diuiii amount of Cu and Zii

Increasing tlie soil test value of available Cu and Zii to about 5 Itg/g is considered

adequate for forest species.

I

J

Application of Fe and Mii is not required for

The overall soil fertility status in the project area is low. Nutrients call be

supplemented 10 alleviate the soil fertility, thereby increasing the yield and to protect the

trees against stress, pest and diseases.

There are 3 main types of tree species that are planted viz. fruit tree (durian),

legume and lion-legume. The fertilizer guide are listed according to the above

classification and given in tables below:

Reconunendatio"

Fruit tree (Durian) for fruits and timber.

Incorporate 100 g organic fertilizer: 6 (% N): 15(%PPP : 3(%K, 0): I(% MgO)

+ TB (trace elements) willI topsoil to fill up the 0,125 In' planting 1101e.

12

I,

Time of A

1st year

Iication

6tli moiltli

2nd year

T e of FertilizeI

12th moritli

and Rate

6th moritli

200 g of 8:4:4:23(%CaO) + TB

Itree

3rd year

12tli month

,,

4tli year and above repeat as for the 3rd year with addition of 500 0 of PR ill alternateyear.

f'

200 g of phosphate )rock (PR) + 200 g )12:12:17:2+TE

6tli montli

Metliod

' I

I__.

12tli month

2

Ring apply evenly about20 cm froin plant base

11

300 g of PR + 500 g)of 12:12:17:2+TB )

Non-legume for timber

About 40 cm from

plant base

11

Incorporate 50 g of GML (ground magnesium limestone) + 100 g of PR at

planting

Time of A

About 80 cm from

plant base

1st year

Iication

1st month

6th month

12tli month

2nd year

T e of Fertilizer

and Rate

3rd year and above

6tli moritli

12th Inonth

100 g of 15:15:6:4

Itree

11

I,

200 g of 15:15:6:4

Method

11

500 g of 15:7:18:2

Ring apply evenly about20 cm from base

Ring apply about 40 cmfrom base

13

Ring apply about 8() cmI'Tom base

I~~3

,.

Legume for timber

I'I

I~

Incorporate 100 g of GML and 100 g of PR at planting

Time of A

I'

-,

I I

I ~

1st year

Iication

I

2nd year

1st montli

6tli Inontli

12tli month

T e of FertilizeI

and Rate

3rd year and above

6tli moritli

12tli Inontli

100 g of 15:15:6:4

Itree

,I

I

(Fertilizers are best applied at the onset of the rainy season)

11

200 g of 0:15:6:4

Once a tightly coupled nutrient cycling system is established (5 10 years)

minimal or no fertilization is required for the legume and non-legume species

I_

J

Method

11

400 g of 0:14:17:2

As ill2

As ill2

We like to record our appreciation and gratitude to Universiti Putra Malaysia,

International Tropical Timber Organization, Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia,

Assoc. Prof. Mohd. Basri Hamzah, Assoc. prof. Ashari Muklitar and Y. B. Dato' Hj

Mohd. Darus bill Hj. Mallmud for financial and Ieclinical support

I_

As in 2

Acknowledgements

14

I~

f

Podon

Series

ClassificationLand use

SlopeDrainageParent material

Diagnostic horizonLocation

Described byExperimentDate

I~

I'

I.

A^I

PI(SCA/D)Bt TerniangUltisol

Shifting cultivationundulating, 4-5% slopewell-drained

graniteargillicInO project, Korbu, PerakShamshuddin, HUSniRehabilitation of natural forest

August 29, 1996

r

I '

I *

\

A1

I. _.

O - 18

B2jj 18 - 43

Ban

Reddish brown (10YR 514); sandy clay loam; moderate, medium,subangular blocky; friable; many, medium-coarse roots; clear, smooth.

Reddish brown (10YR 4/6); sandy loam; weak, medium, subangularblocky; thin, patchy clay coatings on ped faces; friable; many medium-fine roots; diffuse, smooth.

Yellowish red (10YR 4/6); sandy clay; moderate, medium, subangularblocky; thin, patchy clay coatings on ped faces; friable; few, mediumroots; diffuse, smooth.

Reddish brown (2.5YR 4/6); clay; moderate, medium, subangular blocky;thin, patchy clay coatings on ped faces; friable; few, fine roots.

Profile Descri tion

43 - 91

B23j 91+

L

15

r'~~'

., r ~ I~~ --

Depth

(cm)

,-.-~ r

Horizon

,--^

O-18

14-83

43-91

91+-.

O\

pH

HzO KCl

-^-~

A1

B21t

B22t

B23t

,^ ,^--.

Basic cations (NH, OAc)

Ca Mg K

5.45

5.09

4.72

4.54

Chemical Analysis for Fedon PI

4.10

400

3.65

3.75

<

,^-.

14

250

63

15

~~I

35

25

35

15

14g/g

Na

A1

(KCl)

67

58

48

55

~~I

CEC (NH, OAc)

8

9

8

9

'~'I

>

5

24

121

202

<--- cmol(+)/kg --->

'I

N

4.5

3 .5

5.4

6.7

--.

O. C

<....-.. Vo -.---=>

0.13

0.08

0.10

0.10

P (Ag/g)

0.80

0.80

0.40

0.30

4

traces

traces

r~

'~I

r

I~'

--,

,

Pedon

Series





I

P2 (SCA/A)BungorUltisol

Shifting cultivationhilly, 30 - 40% slopewell-drained

SIIale

argillicITTO project, Korbu, PerakShallIshuddin, HUSniRehabilitation of natural forest

August 29, 1996

I

A1

I '

O- 10

B2jj

L_

10 - 50

B22t

Dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/6); clay; Inoderate, Inedium, subangularblocky; friable; few 11/6diuiii roots; clear. sinootli

Yellowisli brown (10YR 516); clay; moderate, medium, subangularblocky; tliin, paidiy clay coatings o11 ped faces; friable; common, fineroots; diffuse, smooth.

Yellowisli browii (10YR 514); clay; moderate, medium, subangularblocky; 11/1n, pareliy clay coalings o11 ped faces: friable; few, Inediumroots; diffuse, sinooth.

Dark yellowisli browii(10YR 4/6); clay; moderate, Inedium, subangular;thin, patcliy clay coatings o11 ped faces: I'riable; few, medium roots;presence of rerinite activities.

PI'onIe Descri tion

50 - 100

B23t 100+

L,

17

I r~~ IT' r'~.

r~~~' r~'.L

Depth

(cm)

Horizon

,^-^-.

L_

O-10

10-50

50-100

100+F~

co

pH

HzO KCl

A1

B21t

B22t

B23t

F~~- r~~.


Ca Mg K

4.74

4.63

4.5 I

5.05

Chemical Analysis for Fedon P2

--.

3.61

3.67

3.60

3.81

<

157

71

31

54

,-- .

105

70

25

20

14g/g

Na

I_

A1

(KCl)

103

106

78

77

--^

CEC (NH, OAc)

_ _I

11

9

8

7

----..^

>

--- ~

108

197

247

17

<--- cmol(+)/kg --->

.-^...^-,

N

9. I

9.8

9.3

10.9

O. C

<---...- 9, "0 --...->

0.18

0.16

0.13

0.16

P ("g/g)

030

0.01

0.01

0.04

3 .3

traces

traces

O. I

-,

I

-J

Podon

Series

Classification

Land use




P3 (LOF)16raiii

Ultisol

logged-over foresthilly, 100% slopewell-drained

SIIale

argillicITTO project, Korbu, PerakShamshuddin, HUSniRehabilitation of natural forest

Auousi 29, 1996

I~

A1 O - 8

B2jt

,-

8 - 40

B22t

L_,

Yellowish brown (10YR 518); sandy clay; 1110derate, 11/6dium, subangularblocky; t'riable; few. tille roots.

Reddisli yellow (5YR 618): clay loam; moderate, Inedium, subangularblocky; 1/11n, patchy clay coatings o11 ped faces; friable; few, mediumroots; diffuse, sinootli

Reddisli yellow (5YR 616); sandy clay; weak, 1116dium, subangular blocky:thin, patcliy clay coatings on ped faces: friable; few, coarse roots; clear,smooth

Red (5YR 518); sandy clay: weak, medium, subangular blocky; thin,patchy clay coalings o11 ped faces; common, quartz gravels; friable; noroots

40 - 95

PI'ome Descri tion

B23j 95+

L

19

r~' I'~ I"~ r~~ ^^

Depth

(cm)

,^-^-

I _

Horizon

r~-\ - .

O-8

8-40

40-95

95+IQo

pH

H20 KCl

I~~~'

A1

B21t

B22t

B23t

f'~~"'L_ _ __.

4.32

4.12

4.10

4.10


Ca Mg K


,^,

3.05

4.27

3.06

3.17

<

14

2

6

2

,-^

26

4

3

2

ICg/g

Na

--^

A1

(KCl)

61

49

36

30

~'~"I

CEC (NH, OAc)

7

6

6

5

--.

>

244

140

201

216

<--- cmol(+)/kg --->

'~~I -.

N

14.3

15.3

15.5

16.4

.-^

O. C

<------- 9. "0 ------>

0.15

0.11

0.12

0.09

P (/"g/g)

0.80

0.30

0.20

0.70

7

0.8

traces

traces

I

^^

.

L

J

.

Pedon

Series



Diagnostic norizonLocation


P4 (LOF)Chat

Ultisol

logged-over foresthilly, 100% slopewell-drained

forrugenous shaleargillicITTO project, Korbu, PerakSIIainshuddin, HUSniRehabilitation of natural forest

August 29, 1996

A1 O- 18

B2 , 18 - 50

B22i

Strong brown (7.5YR 516); clay; weak, 11/6dium, subangular blocky;friable; many, fine roots: clear, smooth

Yellowisli red (5YR 518); clay; weak, 11/6dium, subaiigular blocky; thin,patchy clay coatings on ped faces; friable; many, fine-mediuin roots;diffuse, sinootli

Strong brown (7.5YR 518); clay: weak, medium, subangular blocky; thin,patchy clay coalings o11 ped faces; friable; Inaiiy, fine-medium roots;diffuse, smooth

Yellowisli red (5YR 518); clay; weak, medium, subangular blocky; thin.patchy clay coatings o11 ped faces; t'riable; 110 roots; clear, smooth.

Red (2.5YR 4/8): gravelly clay; weak, medium, subangular blocky; thin,patchy clay coatings o11 ped faces; friable: Inaiiy, quartz gravels; no roots

50 - 90

Profile Desci. i tion

B23j 90 - 140

B24t 140+

21

,^--. r~~~ r

Depth

(cm)

r~'~~ I _ .

Horizon

^--..

O-18

18-50

50-90

90-140

140+I\,IQ

pH

H20 KCl

r'-

A1

B21t

B22t

B23t

B24+

-- .

4.26

4.39

4.31

4.50

491


Ca Mg K

--- .


,~^~*

3.35

3.65

3.63

3.90

4.02

<

r~~'\

7

7

6

8

4

,^-.

. ------,

6

5

4

4

ICg/g

Na

-^

A1

(KCl)

50

49

19

20

16

-^\

CEC (NH, OAc)

8

9

9

12

9

>

.-^.^

254

249

212

197

145

<--- cmol(+)/kg --->

^-\

- ,

.^.^

N

10.5

8.6

7.8

7.6

5 . I

O. C

<--...-- Vo ------>

,

009

0.22

0.11

0.10

0.09

P (^g/g)

060

0.90

0.75

0.59

0.49

5

traces

O. I

traces

traces

F"'~~'

.----,

r" ---

.

r~~ r'~

^P2B2t, 019

IP3B2t, o19IP4B2t, 019

Researcher: DR. AHMAD HUSNl

Analysis by: ARIFFINPrepared By: hanifSample:Date:

Sample

I~".

'~~~~'~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~'~~~~ ~'~Particlesizedistributionmicron^)~~~~~ ~'~ ~ ~~~~~~t~~~~'~~~Total microns _! !clay sill I, eryfi"esand finesand med"in, ""d c, arsesandl~ "I'day Sill Sand~~~; SoilTextureClass* I0-2 ^ 2-20 20-50150-100 100-250 250,500 >500 'Tota1' <2 2.50 >50 UsDA ^

, ~{3.49 ~~~I 8:4^~~' ~ ~glib~ "~4:6:23~ 1:0i~~~ Td:81~ ' Ton4~~'~9'91^~ I 13.49' ~~18.19~~~~^8.25 I sandyioam^ 36.70 27.49 8.01 17.73 0.09 4.27 15.64 99.93 36.70 35.50 27.73 ^ clayloam

51.34 I 7.61 9.33 23.18 0.45 476 330 9997/5/34 16.94 31.69 clay I

I\>LAi

*************

.,^..-\\-- -,

Soil Physics LaboratorySoil Science Department

UNIVERSITI PERTANIAN MALAYSIA

,^^-~

.- J

.-^

- - - ----.

-.---~ ,--^\

---.,.^.-^\ .^

r'~- r'~.

r'~~~L

To:

r~

Attn:

r

Referenceour your

I BLOCKA I

2

r~~~.

IQJ:~

3

4

f'\

Water

\-

SOIL SCIENCEDEPARTMENT

(SOIL FERTILITYand REMEDIATION SECTION)

5

2

pH

4.88

6

3

,.-

4.53

.-

IN KCL

7

4

4.58

APPENDTX TT

J

4.21

8

5

r~~'.

meq/100g

4.65

I_ _

402

9

6

CEC

4.50

406

10

7

,--.-~

4.42

9.4

4.13

11

8

RESULT OF SOIL ANALYSIS

440

6.6

4.14

%

12

9

4.53

8.5

4.03

N

13 BLOCKB I

10

4.60

0.20

6.5

401

11

,--^

5.03

0.31

8.7

4.05

12

P

4. 86

0.31

8.0

4.12

6.55

* - not deterTwine, not enough sample

,

.^

- -.

4.59

0.18

5.9

4.24

3.53

K

0.34

4.62

8.5

4/7

5.50

1/9

,--^____I

0.18

8. I

550

406

54

0.22

Ca

106

5.89

4.10

72

234

^-^-\

0.21

9.3

4.88

-J

74

1/8

0.17

*

4.03

Mg

55

84

0.18

88

9.5

3.95

54

150

ug/g

A1

0.22

90

3 .76

Sample Received:Sample Type: SoilAnalisis:

64

204

68

"I

0.21

314

108.2

66

4/8

86

017

re

289.1

4.88

103

132

78

-^.--\

.

183.9

6.16

844

74

110

52

224.8

Mn

3.95

894

90

238

46

222.6

813

16

*

498

56

238.2

1092

19

74

Zn

674

100

298.0

782

25

*

3

142

2166

512

23

178

Cu

4

134

232.7

905

14

2

*

192. I

585

12

3

%C

2

58

141.6

604

18

2

0.84

170.6

726

15

2

0.28

228.2

677

31

4

2

0.97

640

53

3

1.30

689

44

4

3

1.59

22

9

2

1.39

10

3

3

1.17

9

5

1.22

2

5

1.98

4

1.32

3

1.32

1.51

1.45

.

r" I~"~ ,^^~

To:

,^

- ^ ---.

Attn:

Referenceour your

I~~'~~

14 BLOCKB 2

,-----.

15

IQco

16

,-^\

17

Water

SOIL SCIENCEDEPARTMENT

(SOIL FERTILITYand REMEDIATION SECTION)

18

3

pH

,

5.04

19

4

4.49

IN KCL

20

5

4.44

4.36

21

6

I'.

meq/100g

4.65

4.03

22

7

CEC

4.30

401

23

8

4.65

9.5

408

9

24

RESULTOF SOIL ANALYSIS

4. 86

8.7

3.96

25 BLOCKC I

%

10

,--^\

4.50

4.02

8.5

N

26

11

477

4.12

0.15

8.9

12

,^\

4.45

0.21

3.98

8.2

P

446

*

018

4.07

7.56

* - riot deternune, not enough sample

2

,-^-\

4.45

0.21

10

398

3.57

K

0.15

8.7

5.00

3.97

3.99

79

-^-\_I

0.27

8 . 8

3.98

605

70

0.18

13.5

Ca

4.18

5.50

69

.-^\

162

0.18

8.0

461

56

122

0.18

9.7

2.44

Mg

55

,.-.^.^.\

100

030

8.6

66

3.41

*

242

I

0.17

A1

56

4.61


67

70

'~"~'I

0.18

58

2.83

82.2

55

*

0.15

90

2.83

Fe

341.1

100

338

-.^.-.

36

5.16

333.7

638

76

190

*

215.1

6.01

Mn

906

62

3 16

92

430.3

692

10

49

172

72

387.2

867

30

58

292

Zn

86

238.2

914

14

146

2

50

329.2

741

14

328

Cu

2

54

141.6

698

7

3

62

416.9

772

35

2

3

%C

1/6

3 12.9

107 I

39

2

5

283.2

693

1.21

12

3

3

091

112.6

762

50

8

2

145

792

6

2

2

0.56

10/4

15

4

4

1.54

7

2

3

1.54

42

4

3

1.45

2

2

1.63

2

5

1.73

1.70

1.90

1.42

*

r-^~~.

.---i--- , .

\

I ___

To:

I~~T

Attn:

I'\

Referenceour your

,^~

27

,-- \

28

I\,o

29

,^\

30

3

----..

Water

SOIL SCIENCEDEPARTMENT(SOIL ERRTIUTYand REMEDIATIONSECTION)

31

4

pH

,-----~

32

5

----.

458

IN KCL

33

6

462

34

,^---\

7

449

meq/100g

401

35

8

4.06

CEC

4.05

36

--^-\

9

4.60

3.97

37 BLOCKD I

10

-,

RESULT OFSOIL ANALYSIS

4.46

7.9

3.78

38

,^^-

11

%

4.96

4.01

110

39

N

12

4.46

4.09

11.5

,^\

460

0.20

4.25

*

2

- - ,

P

4.70

0.14

7. 8

3.98

* - riot deterimne, not enough sample

3

,---.-\

5.10

0.24

4.02

8.5

5.12

5.00

0.20

4.05

K

6. 8

531

,^-~

6.9

024

4.26

6.55

52

NO SAMPLE

8 . I

0.39

421

4.61

Ca

.-^\

34

74

014

4.96

54

102

0.20

8.5

8.72

Mg

,-^._ I

*

106

0.14

6. 8

17.83

49

80

0.18

ug/g

30

A1

8.49


.-^\

58

*

0.18

6.12

36

101

192

0.15

30

450

232.2

Fe

64

^-^

124

5.39

*

167.6

61

220

56

372.3

10.58

Am

982

57

252

40

473.3

968

59

266

64

445. I

1060

22

67

174

Zn

84

3 12.9

637

33

240

102

120. I

940

11

332

3

80

Cu

144.6

653

2

2

86

315.9

550

34

2

96

2

131.9

%C

991

7

94. I

1035

22

2

73.3

669

1.71

13

468

145

12

2

2.00

354

72

1.75

87

0.41

59

2

1.91

2

1.68

2

2

0.33

1.59

2

*

1.01

1.58

r-

,

r~~. i~~T I~~~

I

To:

r~~'

Altn:

r' I'~

our

40

I"

I\>\I

your

.-^

4

SOIL SCIENCEDEPARTME(SOIL FERTILITY EDIATION SECTION)

,^-.

534

45

L_

46

,-^-.

47

4.31

48

9

.----.-\

,

10

437

6.9

11

4.54

,-.-.

RESULTOF SOIL ANALYSIS

12

4.46

432

4.00

I~^-.

021

4.10

* - not determine

4.04

~--^-\

6.71

K

9.0

not enough sample

,-.^~.

Ca

2

0.23

---.I

IVlg

85

62

5.78

""~I

A1

72

110


47

90

---.

Fe

120

48

80

32

Mn

52

309.9

32

3 14.4

240.4

Zn

757

266.8

807

582

Cu

13

768

7

8

%C

4

5

2

2

I . 6

1.32

205

I ,--- ,-~-~ ,--^ I~~~\ ,~--~ ,---- -~'~* ,--.- I----\

REPORT ATTHEKORBl. IF. R. ,PERAK

Documents

Transcript of REPORT ATTHEKORBl. IF. R. ,PERAK