Remedies Rules Outline

7/26/2019 Remedies Rules Outline

1/22

REMEDIES RULES OUTLINE

RULE AUTHORITY INTERPRETATION/APPLICATION

INTRO TO REMEDIES

General

Approach to

Crafting a

Remedy

Steps to Crafting a Remedy

1 Is there lia!ility? Must determine whether the defendnt is !e"!!# res$%nsi&!e f%r s%me hrm t% the $!intiff'

" Identif# the re!e(nt remedial goals'

a P!)s Ri"htfu! P%siti%n! Def)s Ri"htfu! P%siti%n

c Punishment *i'e' dis"%r"ement+d Enf%r,emente De,!re ri"hts

# Determine the $$r%$rite type of remedya S$e,ifi, Remedies *-uture Hrm+

$In%&ncti'e Relief

$Specific (erformance) C%ntr,t remed# f%r &re,h'$*rits of Mandam&s) Order t% $u&!i,/,%r$' %ffi,er t% $erf%rm dut# *Marbury+.*rits of (rohi!ition) An %rder t% ud"e t% refrin fr%m unwrrnted ,%ndu,t'$*rit of +a!as Corp&s) Order t% ustif# detenti%n %f $ris%ner'$E%ectment) Order t% ee,t $%ssess%rs fr%m $r%$ert# %wned s%me%ne e!se'

$Reple'in) Order t% $ut $!intiff in $%ssessi%n %f ,htte!s'.Declaratory ,&dgment) A de,!rti%n %f !i&i!it# %r n%n.!i&i!it#'$Stat&tory Remedies for Illegal Admin Action

! Su&stituti%nr# Remedies *-uture Hrm+c Su&stituti%nr# Remedies *Pst Hrm+

- H%w t% implement the remed#'a i'e' 0ht is the 1ri"htfu! $%siti%n2 %r 1de3ute su&stitute2

. H%w t% enforcethe remed#'

(ri'ate ' (&!lic

/a0 /itigation

1 Pri(te Lw Liti"ti%n *Trditi%n!+

A !wsuit initited %ne $rt# "inst n%ther t% determine if set %f e(ents %,,urred nd wht the ,%nse3uen,es re

L%"i,! remed# $$r%,h'" Pu&!i, Lw Liti"ti%n *M%dern+

A !wsuit initited ,!ss %f $e%$!e t% (indi,te C%nstituti%n!/Sttut%r# ri"ht'

4ud"es re m%re ,ti(e in the !wsuit'

Re3uires the use %f e3uit&!e re!ief *inun,ti%ns+ with de,ree m%dif#in" future &eh(i%r &ein" the min remed# s%u"

T+OG+ T+ERE IS A RIG+T T+ERE MA2 NOT 3E A REMED23i'ens Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed Bureau of Narcotics 4SCT 15617

8acts

1 Mn)s h%use is ser,hed un,%nstituti%n!!#5 ne(er ,hr"ed with n#thin" s% there is n% remed# &/, 67 USC 89:;en%wnsu&se3uent!# s 3i'ens ActionAnalysis

C%urts must h(e $%wer t% !!%w f%r remedies f%r the (i%!ti%n %f ri"hts when *8+ there is n% !ternte remed# nd *7+ C%n"re

hs n%t s$e,ifi,!!# s$%=en %n su&e,t'

1The $resent ,se in(%!(es n% s$e,i! f,t%rs ,%unse!in" hesitti%n in the &sen,e %f ffirmti(e ,ti%n C%n"ress'2

Must $r%(e tht (i%!ti%n ws %f ,!er!# est&!ished ,%nst' !w in %rder t% %&tin dm"es fr%m the "%(t'

>e# t% i(ens m# re!!# &e tht n% %ther remed# is (i!&!e

+arlan Conc&rrence

Dm"es re the %n!# remed#' Inun,ti%n is use!ess &/, it !%%=s t% the future n%t t% the $st'Dissent 43lac97

E


2/22

! Diffi,u!t t% !%,te indi(idu! ,,ts'- etter t% sue stte under d%,trine %f res$%ndet su$eri%r nd h(e tri&un! t% determine m%netr# remed# f%r (i%!ti%n %f 6 th

Amendment'

Constit&tional

Torts) 3i'ens

/egacy

Bush v. Lucas 4SCT 15:#7+olding) C%urt ,nn%t im$!# remed# when %thermenin"fu! re!ief is (i!&!e'

1 -eder! em$!%#ees ,n)t &rin" i(ens ,!ims "inst their

em$!%#er'"N% $ri(te ,ti%n f%r em%ti%n! distress nd tt# fees f%r 8st

A (i%!ti%n $er$etrted "inst feder! em$!%#ee fired f%rm=in" $u&!i, sttements ,riti,! %f his "en,# where!e"is!ti%n $r%(ides f%r *8+ reinsttement *7+ retr%,ti(eseni%rit# *;+ retr%,ti(e &,= $#

Chappel v. allace 4SCT 15:#7*n% $ri(te ,ti%n f%rmi!itr# $ers%nne! wh% re inured due t% un,%st)! ,ti%ns %fsu$eri%rs+

Schweiker v. Chilick! 4SCT 15::7

8acts)C%n"ress ref%rms C%ntinuin" Dis&i!it# Re(iew Pr%"rm*CDR+ whi,h SSD dis&i!it# ,!ims re re(iewed'Pr%(ides f%r m%re ,refu! re(iew &ef%re deni! ndretr%,ti(e &enefits if'(roced&re

Suit f%r ment! nd em%ti%n! distress f%r d%$tin"un,%nstituti%n! i!!e"! $%!i,ies tht terminted &enefits in(i%!ti%n %f PDP ri"hts'+olding;Analysis

1 C%urt ,nn%t im$!# remed# when %ther menin"fu! re!ief is(i!&!e' D%es n%t mtter if re!ief is in,%m$!ete'

" C%n" hs ,%nsidered this situti%n nd $r%(ided meaningfulremedies' Must sh%w deferen,e t% C%n"'

# Li=e the $!intiff inBush the# were reinstted@ "i(enretr%,ti(e &enefits nd there is n%thin" n!%"%us t%

seni%rit#'Chilicky hd the sttute n%t !red# &een m%difiedinun,ti(e re!ief w%u!d ,!er!# &e $$r%$riteDissent

The new SSD enefit Ref%rm A,t %f 89:6 d%es n%t &enefitthese indi(idu!s' C%n"' d%es n%t h(e s$e,i! e


3/22

(RE/IMINAR2 RE/IER8

Interloc&tory

Appeal

Interloc&tory appeal of TRO or (relim In%&nction is a'aila!le*,n &e e


4/22

,h!!en"ed dmin "en,# ,ti%n'

)aster Builders of *owa v. Fort )adison (rison*hs n%t%,,urred #et &ut $!)s wise!# s%u"ht TRO t% $re(ent sttefr%m si"nin" >+

&/, s%(erei"n immunit# $re(ents > suits "inst sttes' Truem%st muni,i$! &%nd ,ses'

Motion for a

TRO in Moore

)oore v. Cit! of 'es )oines 4SDIA 15:-7

*L%(e!! usedDataphase stndrd&ut m#&ePlanne Parenthoo w%u!d $$!# sin,e "%(ernment ,ti%n is &ein" ,h!!en"ed+

1 Irre$r&!e Hrm -%,us %n ,!ss &sed nture %f the re!ief w/%ut inun,ti%n it wi!! t=e t !est %ne #er unti! the ne AAI/A3I/IT2> AND SCO(E O8 IN,NCTIONS

(rere&isites for In%&ncti'e Relief

In%&nctions

Generally

In%&nction

1 An EJUITALE REMEDY@ in the f%rm %f COURT ORDER tht dire,ts $ers%n t% ,t %r refrin fr%m ,tin" *$r%hi&its %r,%m$e!s/restrins %r en%ins+ in s$e,ifi, w#'

" Enf%r,ement C%er,i(e remed# enf%r,ed $%wer %f ,%ntem$t'a C%m$enst%r# ,i(i! ,%ntem$t If inun,ti%n/%rder is (i%!ted ,%urt m# wrd m%netr# ,%m$ensti%n t% $!intiff The

,%ntemn%r hs n% ri"ht t% ur# tri! nd ,%urt wi!! t#$i,!!# wrd $! tt# fees *e


5/22

a 0i!! "rntin" the inun,ti%n im$%se undue hrdshi$ %r unfirness t% defendnt- (&!lic interestwi!! n%t &e disser(ed $ermnent inun,ti%n

a D% n%t h(e t% $r%(e furthern,e %f $u&!i, interest' *wi!! n%t@ itse!f@ t#$i,!!# %$erte t% den# re!ief entire!# but seeMil"aukee v. #ctivate Sluge+

! Pr,ti,!it# %f Enf%r,ement N% %(erwhe!min" m%nit%rin"/enf%r,ement &urden %n the ,%urt' Is it w%rth it fr%m ndministrti%n %f usti,e stnd$%int

Monsanto) Reesta!lishes 8o&r$8actor Analysis II3(1 irrepara!le in%&ry *thret %f !e"! hrm ne,essittin" C%urt ,ti%n+" remedies (i!&!e t !w re inade&ate# !alancing of hardships;e&itiesindi,tes tht remed# in e3uit# is wrrnted *sh%u!d ,%me first if there is sttute s in $ec

%r %&ut sttute hs t% &e dmn ,!er+- p&!lic interestwi!! n%t &e disser'ed $ermnent inun,ti%n *furthern,e %f $u&!i, interest+ *wi!! n%t@ itse!f@ t#$i,!!#

%$erte t% den# re!ief entire!# but see Mil"aukee v. #ctivate Sluge+

3lac9 /etter

Cases

-#a! v. )ercexchange 4SCT "


6/22

%ther f,t%rs !s% m%ti(ted the $r,ti,e' *!%wers $!)s &urden %f $r%%f+

E(en if em$!%#er ,n $r%(e the# w%u!d n%t h(e rehired n#w# it is %n!# $rti! defense in this ,se' If this is sh%wn it !im

remed# t% inun,ti(e nd de,!rt%r# re!ief nd tt# fees/,%sts' Remed# is &si,!!# tt# fees nd sttement d%n)t d% it "in

Note that cong has the po0er to alter remedies for constl 'iolations

'eBoom v. "aining "ose4IA7 4w%mn is fired@ $$rent!# &e,use %f $re"nn,#' Un,!er whether IA !!%ws fu!! re,%(er#where dis,riminti%n is mere!# m%ti(tin" f,t%r+

)ckennon v. Nashville Banner (u# Co. 4SCT 155.7 *After ,3uired e(iden,e ,se+8acts

0%mn ste!s fi!es tht $r%(e she wi!! &e fired f%r "e dis,rim)# $ur$%se

+olding

0hen em$!%#er is ttem$tin" t% ustif# terminti%n@ the# re !imited the =n%w!ed"e the# hd t the time %f terminti%n'Analysis

0here em$!%#ee i!!e"!!# t=es h%me ,%nfidenti! d%,uments t% dem%nstrte she ws im$r%$er!# terminted this fter ,3uire

e(iden,e@ un=n%wn t% the em$!%#er t the time %f terminti%n d%es n%t $r%(ide su$er(enin" !e"! res%n f%r terminti%n'

N% reinsttement sin,e she ,n &e terminted u$%n dis,%(er# %f fter ,3uired e(iden,e' Pr%$er remed# is &,= $# fr%m dt

%f terminti%n t% dte fter ,3uired e(iden,e *%f theft+ ws dis,%(ered'

Right (lace in

Reconsideration

Relief Cases

Rightf&l (osition as Reconsideration or Remand to Agency in Administrati'e /a0

Reconsideration Relief) A remed# (i!&!e t% the $!intiff t% h(e n dministrti(e &%d# re,%nsider $ri%r h%!din"'Ri"htfu! $!,e is err%r free de,isi%n' D%es n%t ment P!intiff ne,essri!# "ets wht he wnts'

Rightf&l (lace in(attern (ractice

Cases

"i%%o v. &oode 4SCT 156B7Rre!# wi!! n inun,ti%n issue "inst un!wfu! nd un,%st' $%!i,e ,ti%n &/, the issues re (er# de!i,te'8acts

Hi"h $%!i,e %ffi,i!s re sued f%r $er(si(e $ttern %f i!!e"! nd un,%nstituti%n! mistretment $%!i,e %ffi,ers under thethe%r# %f %ffi,i! indifferen,e t% $%!i,e mis,%ndu,t nd the !i=e!ih%%d tht it w%u!d re%,,ur'+oldings

1 Inun,ti%ns must &e ti!%red s% tht the# re !imited t% f%r,in" th%se dud"ed t% h(e (i%!ted $!intiff)s ri"hts t% rest%re themt% their ri"htfu! $%siti%n' *def must &e !i&!e %r there is n% remed# "inst tht defendnt+

" Inun,ti%ns wi!! n%t issue if there is n%t thret %f future hrm'# An inun,ti%n sh%u!d %n!# issue in %rder t% (indi,te ri"hts'

Analysis

1 N%nfesn,e s t% hi"h $%!i,e %ffi,i!s in this ,se' N% $%!i,# %f i"n%rin" $%!i,e &use' M!fesnt mis,%ndu,t ws !%w!e(e! %ffi,ers n%t the hi"h !e(e! %ffi,ers &ein" sued'

" T#$i,!!# inun,ti(e re!ief d%es n%t run "inst indi(idu! %ffi,ers# D% n%t red t% &r%d!#' Misfesn,e hi"h $%!i,e %ffi,i!s w%u!d h(e !!%wed f%r inun,ti%n' See ,ague v. C.*..*,se

!!%win" inun,ti%n "inst m#%r nd ,hief %f $%!i,e f%r ,ti(e misfesn,e+

-" SC 1-1-1) i(es U'S' De$t' %f 4usti,e uth%rit# t% &rin" $ttern nd $r,ti,e !iti"ti%n t% en%in $%!i,e mis,%ndu,t'

Ne0 ,ersey Consent Decree) DO4 %&tined inun,ti%n e!iminted use %f r,e in $%!i,e ,ti(ities' This is !!%wed@ $%st.Ri''o&e,use it ws the U'S' *n%t indi(idu!s+ suin" N4' C%n"ress m%dified RiBB% with 67 USC 86868 !!%win" f%r DO4 suits'

Rightf&l (lace in

Election Cases

)arks v. Stinson 4#d Cir 155-7 *if $! !%ses e!e,ti%n due t% f!wed (%te ,%untin" new e!e,ti%n wi!! n%t &e %rdered un!ess hedem%nstrtes tht m%re (%tes were ffe,ted thn the mr"in %f (i,t%r#+ BU/ S--)"- /,AN "*&,/FUL (LAC-

-L-C/*N CAS-S

Bell v. Southwell4.th Cir 15B67*where ,ndidte is &!,= nd &!,= (%ters re e


7/22

# Deferen,e sh%wn t% "i(e $ris%n dmin nd !e" the &enefit %f the d%u&t' Ct ,nn%t t=e %(er $ris%n nd re,%"niBes tht the# understffed'

- Durin" !wsuit $ris%n $%!i,# ws ,hn"ed t% !!%w f%r herin"' /o'ell su,,essfu!!# r"ued $ri%r herin" ws re3)d $ri%r t%se"re"ti%n underMorrissey "rie(%us !%ssstndrd' )orisse! v. Brewer4IASCT7

a re3)s de3ute $r%,edur! herin"s in,!udin" d(%,te f%r !! inmtes in IDU unit within 8 d#s'! retins urisdi,ti%n t% ensure new !red# $$r%(ed herin" $r%,edures re im$!emented

. Ct h%!ds "inst $!s %n ,h!!en"e re IDU se,!usi%n unit' &ut retins urisdi,ti%n t% "i(e !e" ,hn,e t% $ss &i!! under

,%nsiderti%n tht w%u!d $r%(ide f%r ren%(ti%n@ m%re "urds *!ess thn ri"htfu! $!,e remed# t time %f issun,e+'B Pris%n stff ws %$enin" tt# ,%rres$%nden,e' This (i%!ted ri"ht t% ,%unse! under th@ nd 86thAmds' Ct h%!ds tht it ,n %n!

&e %$ened in fr%nt %f inmte@ if there is sus$i,i%n %f ,%ntr&nd'

6 Ct %rdered D'O' unit ,!%sed within 7 d#s'a L%n" term ,%nfinement in D'O' se" is n%t un,%st' &ut $eri%di, ; d# re(iew herin"s with d(ersr# settin" is re3)d! One #er !ter D'O' se,!usi%n unit hd &een ,%n(erted int% $ris%n !i&rr# with s=#!i"hts@ wind%ws'

Note)#ikensws $ris%n ref%rm stru,tur!/re$rti(e inun,ti%n' In 899 in"ri,h nd PLRA !imits re!ief'

Rightf&l (lace in

(D( (risoner

Cases

)orrisse! v. Brewer4IASCT 156"7*Pr%!e is !i&ert# interest t% whi,h due $r%,ess tt,hes+

Grie'o&s /oss Standard

If there is $%tenti! f%r "rie(%us !%ss the f%!!%win" re re3)d1 de3ute nd time!# written n%ti,e %f the ,hr"e" fir %$$%rtunit# t% e


8/22

$!,e remed#'

3alancing)

More Than

Rightf&l (lace

Remedy

Times 0hen a more than rightf&l place remedy is appropriate

1 Ct is de!in" with o!str&ctionist or recalcitrantdefendnt" (rophyla@is and Impossi!ility)It is (er# diffi,u!t t% fshi%n $re,ise ri"htfu! $!,e remed# &ut &ri"ht !ine m%re thn ri"htfu

$!,e remed# is esi!# enf%r,e&!e

omen (risoners v. 'C

E(iden,e %f &use resu!ts in h%t!ine@ "rie(n,e $r%,edure@ stff trinin"@ re$%rtin" me,hnism@ em$!%#ee sn,ti%ns@ e


9/22

) v. 4enkins *** 4SCT 155.7 4'ol&ntary approach7

+olding) The ,%urt ,nn%t remed# n intrdistri,t $r%&!em %rderin" remed# with n interdistri,t $ur$%se'>C m"net $r%"rm is n interdistri,t remed# whi,h is &e#%nd the s,%$e %f the intrdistri,t ,%nst)! (i%!ti%n theref%re DCT 1hs de(ised remed#,,%m$!ish indire,t!# wht it dmitted!# !,=s the remedi! uth%rit# t% mndte dire,t!# the interdistri,t trnsfer %f students2Analysis

1 nli9eSwann no interdistrict 'iolation only intradistrict 'iolation

" DCT %rdered tht !! s,h%%!s in >C distri,t &e,%me m"net s,h%%!s %! ws t% ttr,t white student tht !eft the distri,t t% return'

# S,%$e %f the remed# ws &r%der thn Mi!!i=en Cnn%t su$$%rt intrdistri,t remed# with un!imited e


10/22

Constl ariations of Inade&acy Re

1 th A $ermittin" t=in" %f $r%$ert# f%r $u&!i, use the th A denies %wner inun,ti(e re!ief see $elo v. Cit! of New London*dm"es remed# mndted+

" 8st A Pr%hi&iti%n %n $ri%r restrint m=es it mu,h esier t% ,%!!e,t dm"es thn en%in s$ee,h' Must wit unti! fter hrm nfi!e ,ti%n ie defmti%n'

Stat&tory ariations of Inade&acy Re1 T< Inun,ti%n A,t n% fed inun,ti%ns f%r t< %(er ssessment where stte !w $r%(ides remed#'" Sttute m# $r%s,ri&e %r $res,ri&e de3ute remed# ru!e

a EPA ,!en u$ ,nn%t &e ,h!!en"ed unti! fter the f,t t% $re(ent de!#s nd e


11/22

$$e!' SCT ru!ed tht when m%ti%n t% 3ush su&$%endu,es te,um is denied m%(nt m# (i%!te it nd if ,ited f%r,%ntem$t m# $r%$er!# ,%ntest its (!idit# in the ,%ntem$t

$r%,eedin"'

alker v. Cit! of Birmingham 4SCT 15B67 4Still Good

/a07 4ML> nd %thers en%ined *e< $rte TRO+ fr%m

h%!din" dem%nstrti%n %n %%d -rid#' The# did s% n#w#'Cited with ,%ntem$t whi,h is u$he!d under ,%!!ter! &rru!e'+Dissent) Ordinn,e $r%(ided f%r ,rimin! sn,ti%ns nd ,it#,%u!d h(e $r%se,uted f%r misdemen%r' Ct usur$ed fun,ti%n%f ur#' Unfir in $ri%r restrint ,se &/, if #%u re

$r%se,uted f%r ,rime &ut def hs ,%nst)! ,h!!en"e t% sttute this is n &s%!ute defense' Defendnt)s werere$eted!# denied $ermit' E< $rte TRO@ !,= %fre$resentti%n is mnifest!# unfir' r%d TRO with!n"u"e %f $rde %rdinn,e' Less thn 76 hrs t% m%dif# %rdiss%!(e TRO with n% tt#s (i!&!e' BU/ S--

Carroll v. (resident of (rincess Anne4SCT 15B:7

>>> R!!# is en%ined' In -irst A $ri%r restrint ,se TRO

issuin" $ri%r restrint is trns$rent!# in(!id if n% sh%win"is mde tht it is im$%ssi&!e t% ser(e %r n%tif# %$$%sin"

$rties nd t% "i(e them %$$%rtunit# t% $rti,i$te'

*n re (rovidence 4ournal Co41stCir 15:67P$er hs ;.d#TRO $ut %n it n%t t% run st%r# &%ut mfi =in" deth'i%!tes TRO@ whi,h su&se3uent!# is f%und t% &e un,%nst'under 8stmendment'(er c&riam) Pu&!ishers must@ in "%%d fith@ see= e


12/22

inter$retti%n %f 88thA in$ans." T% re,%n,i!e the tw% the ,t in(ented the stri$$in"

d%,trine'# est w# t% understnd this is tht 86 thA ,me fter 88thA

nd is s$e,ifi,!!# intended t% !imit s%(erei"n immunit#%f the stte'

Castle "ock v. &on%ales4SCT "


13/22

# Pu&!i, Pur$%se ser(ed'

Consent Decrees

in Cases Against

the State

Frew v. ,awkins 4SCT "


14/22

Lw#er sh%u!d &e sure t% ,%nsider dm"es fr%m d# %ne %f the ,se

Remitturer feder! ,%urts d% n%t !!%w dditur

(res&med damages) when $!intiff see=s ,%m$ensti%n f%r n inur# tht is !i=e!# t% h(e %,,urred &ut diffi,u!t t% est&!ish'Rti%n!e &sed %n hrd t% 3untif# nd &r%d ,%nsensus tht ,tu! inur# t=es $!,e' If !i&i!it# is $r%(en $! ,n "% t% the uwith%ut $r%%f %f inur#' *defmti%n@ ssu!t nd &tter#+

J&antification

of Damages

)emphis v. Stachtura 4SCT 15:B7

8acts) Te,her see=s ,%m$enst%r# nd $uniti(e dm"es f%r (i%!ti%n %f se, 89:; ri"hts *8stA nd 86thA SDP+' Sus$endedwith $# &ut = n%t renewed'+olding) Dm"es &sed %n the &str,t 1(!ue2 %r 1im$%rtn,e2 %f ,%nstituti%n! ri"hts re n%t $ermissi&!e e!ement %f,%m$enst%r# dm"es in 89:; ,ses'Analysis) T% ("ue nd uth%riBes r&itrr# wrds' M!i,e is re3)d f%r $uniti(e dm"es' Sin,e 89:; uth%riBes,%m$enst%r# dm"es $resumed dm"es ,nn%t &e (i!&!e here'

E&ita!le '

/egal Relief

)ertens v. ,ewitt Associates*denies ,%m$ dm"es inERISA ,ses sin,e the se,ti%n %f the sttute in 3uesti%ns$e,ifi,!!# uth%riBes %n!# e3uit&!e re!ief+

/eamsters v. /err!

L&%r !w ,se in issue %f whether uni%n hd &re,hed itsdut# %f fir re$resentti%n t% s%me mem&ers'+y!rid action)$rt &re,h %f > nd &re,h %f fidu,ir# dut#

Ct !%%=ed t the nat&re of the remedy;reliefnd f%und ththere it ws ,%ntr%!!in"' ,=$# nd &enefits re e3ui(!entt% ,%m$ dm"es' Theref%re@ ri"ht t% ur# tri!'

/egal ' E&ita!le

Ri"ht t% ur# tri! is ,i(i! ,ses is determined whether re!i

wi!! &e e3uit&!e %r !e"!@ h%we(er there re times whene3uit# ,ts r%utine!# wrd m%ne# dm"es *ie &re,h %ftrust+'

Cts h(e f%und &,=$# %r fr%nt$# re !e"! remedies'

Under Tit!e II &,=$# nd fr%nt$# re ,hr,teriBed s

e3uit&!e re!ief under the sttute' Ct wi!! !!%w ,%n" t%

,!ssif# &,=$# s !e"! %r e3uit&!e remed#' /eamstev. /err!

Tort Damages A!ers v. 4ackson /ownship4N, 15:67

8acts)T%


15/22

e


16/22

State Farm v Camp#ell 4SCT "


17/22

Buckhannon Board v. 0 4SCT " w/ $! s we!!+

&rat% v. Bollinger 4SCT "


18/22

hd &een f%und undert=in" t% d% m%re thn the C%nstituti%n itse!f re3uires' "ufo

-vans v. 4eff '. *tt# fees ,t d%es n%t $re(ent $rt# fr%m wi(in" e!i"i&i!it# f%r tt# fees in ,%nsent de,ree+

Standard for

Modification of

Consent Decree

Swift 415#"7) Crd%B% If the defendnt m%(es t% m%dif# ninun,ti%n it wi!! %n!# t=e $!,e if there is 1,!er sh%win"%fgrievous "ronge(%=ed new nd unf%reseen,%nditi%ns2

United Shoe 415B:7) Su$ ,t h%!ds tht 1"re(i%us wr%n"2stndrd d%es n%t $$!# t% P!s' On!# $$!ies t% m%difi,ti%nsre3uested defendnt see=in" t% (%id res$%nsi&i!itiesunder the im$%sed %rder'

Frew v. ,awkins 4SCT "


19/22

M=es $$! !ess !i=e!# t% enter de,rees

Unfir t% f%r,e $! t% re!iti"te fter #ers %f

ne"%titi%n. Stri,ter stndrd sh%u!d $$!# where m%difi,ti%n

re3uests undermine ,entr! $ur$%se %f ,%nsent de,ree'

hite

C%nsent de,ree &nned uni%n sh%$s nd then !e" ws $ssedtht !!%wed uni%n sh%$s' This ws &sis f%r m%difi,ti%n'

tht it ,%nf%rms t% ,%nstituti%n! f!%%r'

Defer t% !%,! uth%rities' -inn,i! ,%nstrints re !e"it

,%n,erns &ut m# n%t &e used t% ustif# ,%nstituti%n!(i%!ti%ns' 4enkins

Relief from an

Order;,&dgmen

t in Instit&tional

Reform /itig

,orne v. Flores 4SCT "


20/22

heeling #ridge 4SCT 1:.< 7 *where under!#in" !w is ,hn"ed ,%n"ress inun,ti(e re!ief m# &e,%me unenf%r,e&!e+

C%n"ress ,n $ss !ws whi,h in(!idte ,%urt de,isi%n when it hs t% d% with $r%s$e,ti(e re!ief &ut n%t dm"es de,isi%nf%r $st hrm'

CASE NAMES

Biven Con /ort &ivings

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents

of Fed Bureau of Narcotics 4SCT

15617

No Emotional 3&sh

Bush v. Lucas 4SCT 15:#7

Mili$C+A((E/ 3i'ens 3a!!le

Chappel v. allace 4SCT 15:#7

No 3i'ens SSD in Chilic9ySchweiker v. Chilick! 4SCT 15::7

*il9ie 3i'ens " 8actory

ilkie v. "o##ins 4SCT "


21/22

Appeal to Tric9in Contempt in

Griffin

&riffin v. Count! School Bd of (rince

-dward Count!

CollaterO33/EDIC E@ception

Co##ledick v. US 4SCT 15-


22/22

Remedies Rules Outline

Documents

Transcript of Remedies Rules Outline