REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN for

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN

for

PROPOSED 365 BOND STREET REDEVELOPMENT

Brooklyn, New York Tax Map Block 458 Lot 1

NYCOER Project No. 13EH-A196K

NYSDEC Spill No. 04-07393

USEPA No. 422395.DE.02

Prepared For:

The Lightstone Group 460 Park Avenue, 13th Floor

New York, New York 10022

Prepared By:

Langan Engineering, Environmental, Surveying

and Landscape Architecture, D.P.C. 619 River Drive Center 1

Elmwood Park, New Jersey 07407 NJ Certificate of Authorization No. 24GA27996400

Chris McMahon

Project Geologist

Steven A. Ciambruschini, PG, LEP

Principal / Vice President

Final: 9 November 2012

Final Revised: 10 July 2013

100287501

Remedial Investigation Work Plan Proposed 365 Bond Street Development

TOC-i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Site Location and Current Usage ...................................................................... 1

1.2 Proposed Redevelopment Plan ......................................................................... 2

1.3 Description of Surrounding Property ............................................................... 2

2.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION ..................................................... 3

2.1 Environmental Investigation Reports ............................................................... 3

2.2 Summary of Regulatory Correspondence ........................................................ 3

2.3 Findings of Previous Environmental Investigations ........................................ 6

2.4 Data Usability ................................................................................................... 12

2.5 Summary of Previous Environmental Investigations .................................... 13

3.0 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION .......................................................... 16

3.1 Investigation Rationale .................................................................................... 16

3.2 Investigation Procedures ................................................................................. 18

3.3 Sample Analysis ............................................................................................... 21

3.4 Reporting .......................................................................................................... 21

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL ............................................................ 22

4.1 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures ............................................. 22

4.2 Field QA/QC ..................................................................................................... 22

4.3 Sample Custody ............................................................................................... 23

4.4 Report Logs ...................................................................................................... 24

4.5 Laboratory QA/QC ........................................................................................... 25

5.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN (HASP) ......................................................................... 25

5.1 Health and Safety Plan (HASP) ....................................................................... 25


TOC-ii

TABLES

Table 1 Historic Sampling Summary

Table 2 Historic Soil Analytical Results – 365 Bond Street

Table 3 Historic Groundwater Analytical Results – 365 Bond Street

Table 4 Historic Soil Vapor Analytical Results – 365 Bond Street

Table 5 Proposed Remedial Investigation Sampling Summary

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map

Figure 2 Site Plan

Figure 3 Summary of Historic Soil Analytical Data – 365 Bond Street

Figure 4 Summary of Historic Groundwater Analytical Data – 365 Bond Street

Figure 5 Summary of Historic Soil Vapor Analytical Data – 365 Bond Street

Figure 6 Summary of NAPL Observations

Figure 7 Proposed Sample Location Plan

APPENDICES

Appendix A Architectural Drawings

Appendix B Previous Environmental Investigations

Appendix C Previous Regulatory Correspondence

Appendix D HASP

\\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013-07 - NYSDEC RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\365 Bond St_NYSDEC RIWP (Final 2012-11-09, Rev.2013-

07-10).doc


TOC-iii

Acronym Definition

AST Aboveground Storage Tank

CAMP Community Air Monitoring Plan

C&D Construction & Demolition

CEQR City Environmental Quality Review

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CHASP Construction Health and Safety Plan

CO Certificate of Occupancy

CPC City Planning Commission

DSNY Department of Sanitation

“E” E-Designation

EAS Environmental Assessment Statement

EIS Environmental Impact Statement

ESA Environmental Site Assessment

EC/IC Engineering Control and Institutional Control

ELAP Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program

FDNY New York City Fire Department

GPR Ground Penetrating Radar

HASP Health and Safety Plan

HAZWOPER Hazardous Waste Operations Emergency Response

IDW Investigation Derived Waste

Notice - NNO Notice of No Objection

Notice - NTP Notice To Proceed

Notice - NOS Notice Of Satisfaction

Notice - FNOS Final Notice of Satisfaction

NYC BSA New York City Board of Standards and Appeals

NYC DCP New York City Department of City Planning

NYC DEP New York City Department of Environmental Protection

NYC DOB New York City Department of Buildings

NYC DOF New York City Department of Finance

NYC HPD New York City Housing Preservation and Development

NYCRR New York Codes Rules and Regulations

NYC OER New York City Office of Environmental Remediation


TOC-iv

Acronym Definition

NYS DEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

NYS DEC DER New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Division of Environmental Remediation

NYS DEC PBS New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Petroleum Bulk Storage

NYS DOH New York State Department of Health

NYS DOT New York State Department of Transportation

OSHA United States Occupational Health and Safety Administration

PAHs Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

PCBs Polychlorinated Biphenyls

PE Professional Engineer

PID Photo Ionization Detector

PM Particulate Matter

QEP Qualified Environmental Professional

RA Register Architect

RAP Remedial Action Plan

RCA Recycled Concrete Aggregate

RCR Remedial Closure Report

RD Restrictive Declaration

RI Remedial Investigation

SCOs Soil Cleanup Objectives

SCG Standards, Criteria and Guidance

SMP Site Management Plan

SPDES State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System

SSDS Sub-Slab Depressurization System

SVOCs Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds

USCS Unified Soil Classification System

USGS United States Geological Survey

UST Underground Storage Tank

TAL Target Analyte List

TCL Target Compound List

TCO Temporary Certificate of Occupancy

VB Vapor Barrier

VOCs Volatile Organic Compounds


1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This Remedial Investigation Work Plan (RIWP) and Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

have been developed for the Proposed Bond Street Redevelopment project, located

at 365 Bond Street (Block 458 Lot 1) in the Carroll Gardens neighborhood of

Brooklyn, New York (the Site). Remedial Investigation and Remedial Action Work

Plan (RAWP) were previously reviewed and approved by the New City Department

of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) and New York State Department of

Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) for the Site. This Work Plan describes the

proposed investigation that will address the environmental concerns identified in

previous Phase I ESAs and supplement the results reported during previous sub-

surface investigations. This investigation is being conducted to complete

delineation of the previously defined excavation and/or soil stabilization areas as

identified in the 2009 Remedial Action Plan (RAP) (previously approved by NYSDEC)

prepared for the Site. Additional soil, groundwater and soil gas sampling was

completed subsequent to the RAP submittal as part of a due diligence assessment

of the Site, and additional sampling is proposed as part of this work plan to address

NYSDEC requirements for delineation and assessment of groundwater and soil gas

in order to develop a revised Remedial Action Work Plan. The investigation

activities being completed as part of this remedial investigation (in addition to the

results of the previous investigations) will completely delineate areas where

excavation of impacted soil will be conducted and seek to define the final limits of

these excavations. A detailed discussion of previous report submittals and results

of the due diligence investigation are provided in Section 2.0 of this work plan.

The site-specific HASP, which includes a Community Air Monitoring Program

(CAMP), (Appendix D) addresses potential hazards, contaminants of concern based

on past use and safety requirements associated with investigation activities in

accordance with ASTM and OSHA guidelines.

1.1 Site Location and Current Usage

The Site is located in the Carroll Gardens neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York

and is identified as Block 458, Lot 1 on the New York City Tax Map. Figure 1

is a Site location map and a site plan of the property is provided as Figure 2.

The Site consists of the parcel discussed below.


2

The property at 365 Bond Street (Tax Block 458, Lot 1) is located south of the

intersection of Bond Street and First Street. The approximately ±2.02-acre site

contains a vacant two-story commercial building that occupies the block’s entire

Bond Street frontage and a vacant lot used for truck parking and storage

adjacent to the canal. The site is bounded to the northeast by First Street

followed by a one- and two-story light industrial building, to the southeast by the

Gowanus Canal followed by a three-story commercial building, to the southwest

by Second Street followed by three three-story residential buildings, three one-

to two-story industrial and manufacturing buildings, a one-story office building,

and a truck parking facility, and to the northwest by Bond Street followed by five

two- to five-story residential buildings.

1.2 Proposed Redevelopment Plan

The proposed use of the Site will consist of constructing one 5 to 12-story

residential building occupying almost the entire footprint of the subject property.

The first floor levels of the buildings will be occupied by residential and

commercial spaces. A partial below-grade parking level is currently proposed in

the central portion of the Site. In addition to the building plans, a waterfront

esplanade will be developed along the Gowanus Canal shoreline. The subject

property is zoned as M1-4/R7-2, industrial and manufacturing and medium-

density apartment house residential. Additionally, the subject property is zoned

in a Special Mixed Use District established to encourage the investment in and

enhance the vitality of existing neighborhoods with mixed residential and

industrial uses in close proximity. A copy of the architectural plans for the Site is

provided in Appendix A.

1.3 Description of Surrounding Property

The surrounding area consists of industrial, commercial, and residential uses. A

light industrial building is located to the north of the subject property.

Commercial and manufacturing buildings are located to the south of the subject

property. To the east is the Gowanus Canal followed by industrial facilities. Bond

Street is located to the west of the subject property followed by multi-family

residential buildings. The majority of surrounding properties have a M1-4/R7-2,

industrial and manufacturing zoning designation or a R6B, mixed residential and

commercial building zoning designation.


3

2.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION

2.1 Environmental Investigation Reports

The following environmental work plans and reports were developed for the

subject property:

Draft Phase I ESA – 365 Bond Street, dated July 2001, prepared by

Environmental Assessment & Remediations;

Phase I ESA – 365 Bond Street, dated September 2001, prepared by GeoQuest;

Environmental Inspection – All Brite Cleaners, dated December 2003,

prepared by GeoQuest;

Phase I ESA – 365 Bond Street, dated September 30, 2004, prepared by ELM;

Phase II Investigation Report – 365 Bond Street, dated October 25, 2004,

prepared by ELM;

Remedial Action Plan – 363-365 Bond Street and 400 Carroll Street,

dated February 3, 2009, Prepared by ELM;

Draft Subsurface Investigation Summary Report, dated 13 September 2011,

prepared by PW Grosser Consulting, Inc.;

Phase I Environmental Assessment – 365 Bond Street, dated February 2012,

prepared by PW Grosser;

Limited Phase II Environmental Investigation Report – Proposed 363-365 Bond

Street Redevelopment, dated October 2012, completed by Langan

Engineering & Environmental Services.

Digital copies of the above referenced environmental work plans and reports

are included in Appendix B.

2.2 Summary of Regulatory Correspondence

The following is a summary of pertinent regulatory correspondence related

to the subject property:

Notice of Completion of the Final Environmental Impact Statement, prepared by

the New York City Department of City Planning, dated 6 February 2009.

The New York City Department of City Planning issued the Notice of

Completion of the Final Environmental Impact Statement that was submitted

for the redevelopment of 365 Bond Street.


4

Email dated 40 March 2012, RE: 400 Carroll Street, from Brian Carr (USEPA)

to David Yudelson (Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.)

This email identifies that the conceptual bulkhead replacement proposed by

PW Grosser was reviewed and, that the conceptual approach was approved.

It is further identified that formal approval would be contingent on review of

a detailed design.

In a letter dated September 2012, the USEPA issued a letter regarding the

Lightstone Group proposal at the former Toll Brothers property. The letter

identifies that groundwater monitoring wells were installed on the 365 Bond

Street property to assess the former location of two fuel terminals. The

results identified an area of deep subsurface contamination at a neighboring

property and that additional sampling be completed at this property to

address these impacts. Additional sampling was completed in 2011 and the

results indicated small localized deep impacts that would not impact the

future redevelopment of the site.

October 2012 EPA Update Regarding the Lightstone Group Proposal,

prepared by the USEPA.

This letter identified that the USEPA’s conceptual approach to a coordinated

cleanup includes:

1. Addressing continuing upland sources before dredging of the Canal to

be conducted as part of the overall Superfund Cleanup, reaches that

location;

2. Where possible, upgrading bulkheads before dredging to reduce the

cost and time needed to install temporary sheet piling; and,

3. Reducing the impacts of Combined Sewer Overflow discharges.

The letter notes that the proposed redevelopment of the site would satisfy

each of these goals if implemented.

Phase I ESA Summary

The Draft Phase I ESA completed by Environmental Assessment & Remediations

in July 2001 noted the following:

Evidence of spills or illegal discharges;

Exterior drainage basins on the property;


5

A 1,080-gallon aboveground storage tank (AST) containing fuel oil was

reportedly removed from the subject property in 2000; and,

Storage drums filled with waste oil with associated spillage and staining.

The Phase I ESA completed by Geoquest in September 2001 noted the

following:

Drum storage on the property;

A 1,080-gallon AST was removed from the property in 2000; and,

ASTs were removed from the property prior to 1966.

The Phase I ESA completed by Environmental Liability Management in September

2004 noted that the subject property was identified in the Drycleaners database

and identified the following RECs:

Hazardous substances and petroleum products in connection with identified

on- and off-site historical uses;

Hazardous substances and petroleum products formerly stored on the

subject property; and,

Historic fill material of unknown origin.

Additionally, ELM identified the potential environmental concerns:

Current site use (drycleaner); and,

Chemicals and miscellaneous debris currently stored on-site.

The Phase I completed by PW Grosser in February 2012 identified the

following RECs:

The property’s extensive industrial history including a Bulk Oil Storage

Facility and a dry cleaner;

Historical underground gasoline tanks;

An active NYSDEC spill with the presence of contaminated soil and

potential for sub-slab vapor/indoor air concern;

Historic fill;

Location adjacent to the Gowanus Canal, a National Priorities List

(Superfund) site; and,

E-designation, E-221, for air quality.


6

2.3 Findings of Previous Environmental Investigations

The following previous environmental reports were completed for the subject

property. RECs/AOCs identified in these reports are shown on Figure 2 and a

historic sampling summary table is provided as Table 1. Historic soil,

groundwater, and soil vapor results for 365 Bond Street are shown on Figures 3,

4, and 5, respectively. Historic soil analytical results (compared to current

NYSDEC Brownfields Soil Cleanup Objectives (SCOs) for 365 Bond Street are

summarized in Table 2 and historic groundwater analytical results for these

parcels are summarized in Table 3. Historic soil vapor analytical results for 365

Bond Street are provided in Table 4. Details of the previous environmental

investigation reports are provided below.

Geology and Hydrogeology

Based on the observations made during the previous investigation completed

at the Site, the entire Site is underlain by a layer of miscellaneous fill material

that is underlain by a continuous clay layer. A description of the thickness of

the fill material and clay layer as well as groundwater observations for each

property is provided below.

The site is underlain by an approximately 5.5- to 13-foot thick layer of

miscellaneous fill material that was underlain by a clay layer that was observed

in all borings with exception of LSB-11 which was terminated at 15 feet bgs.

The clay layer was observed to be greater than 5 feet in thickness at the

LSB-13, LSB-14 and LSB-15 locations. LSB-16 was completed to a depth of

approximately 30 feet bgs. The clay layer in this boring was observed to be 8

feet thick and was underlain by alternating layers of silty sand and a silt of

medium density. Groundwater was observed to be approximately 2.5 to 10

feet bgs


7

Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – 365 Bond Street, dated October 25,

2004, prepared by Langan Engineering

1. The subsurface soil profile generally consisted of a surficial layer of fill

underlain by an organic clay layer followed by natural sand.

2. At the completion of the investigation groundwater was measured in the

piezometer at 8 feet below sidewalk level. A subsequent measurement

taken two weeks later measured groundwater depth at 6.5 feet below

sidewalk level.

3. It was concluded that groundwater level could be influenced by tidal

fluctuations at the mouth of the Gowanus Bay.

Phase II Investigation Report – 365 Bond Street, dated October 25, 2004,

prepared by ELM

1. Evidence of petroleum impacts was noted in all ten soil borings.

2. Analytical results from the 2004 sampling revealed that elevated

concentrations of VOCs (benzene and total xylenes) above the New York

State NYSDEC TAGM RSCOs were noted in soil at B-5 (4.5 to 6.5 feet

bgs) and MW-3 (incorrectly reported as B-3) (3 to 5 feet bgs) were

detected. PAHs (benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene,

benzo(k)fluoranthene, chrysene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, indeno(1,2,3-

c,d)pyrene, isophorone, and 4-methylphenol) were detected in soils in the

shallow and deep vadose zones above the TAGM RSCOs at B-1, B-2, B-4,

B-5, MW-2; MW-3; MW-4 and MW-5 locations. PAHs were detected in

exceedance of the TAGM RSCOs in both the vadose zone and saturated

zones in B-3 and MW-1 locations. Metals (arsenic, beryllium, cadmium,

calcium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, manganese, mercury,

nickel, selenium, and zinc) were detected in the shallow and deep vadose

zones above the TAGM RSCOs at B-1, B-2, B-4, B-5, MW-1, MW-3,

MW-4, and MW-5. Metals were detected in exceedance of the TAGM

RSCOs in both the vadose zone and saturated zones in the B-3, and

MW-1 locations. Pesticides and PCBs were not detected in soil above

the TAGM 4046 RSCOs.


8

3. Benzene and phenol were detected above the NYSDEC GWQS in PZ-1 and

an elevated concentration of the pesticide 4,4’-DDT were detected in

groundwater at MW-4. Concentrations of metals (iron, magnesium, and

sodium) above GWQS were detected in groundwater at MW-1, MW-2,

MW-3, MW-4, MW-5, and PZ-1. PCBs were not detected above GWQS in

any of the groundwater samples collected.

4. Langan compared the soil analytical data collected by ELM to the NYSDEC

Revised Brownfields SCOs. Elevated concentrations of VOCs (1,2-dichloroethene

[cis], acetone, benzene, toluene, and total xylenes) were detected above the

UUOs at B-5 (0.5 to 2.5 feet and 4.5 to 6.5 feet bgs), MW-3 (3 to 5 feet and 5 to

7 feet bgs), and MW-5 (5 to 7 feet b.g.s) were noted. A summary of SVOC and

metal exceedances is provided in the table below.

Boring

Location

Depth

(feet

bgs)

Parameters UUOs Residential

RUOs

Restricted

Residential

RUOs

Restricted

Commercial

RUOs

Restricted

Industrial

RUOs

B-1 3 to 5 Metals X

B-1 3 to 5 PAH X X X X

B-2 3 to 5 Metals X

B-2 5 to 7 PAH/metals X

B-3 11 to 13 Metals X

B-4 1 to 3 Metals X X X

B-4 5 to 7 PAH X X X X

B-5 4.5 to 6.5 PAH X X X X X

B-5 4.5 to 6.5 Metals X

MW-1 5 to 7 PAH/Metals X X X X X

MW-1 17 to 19 Metals X

MW-2 3 to 5 Metals X X X X

MW-3 3 to 5 PAH X X

MW-3 5 to 7 PAH X X

MW-4 1 to 3 PAH X X X X X


MW-4 3 to 5 PAH/Metals X X X X X

MW-5 1 to 3 PAH X X X X X



MW-5 5 to 7 Metals X X X X X

5. Pesticides were not detected in soil above the UUOs.


9

Remedial Action Plan – 363-365 Bond Street and 400 Carroll Street,

dated 3 February 2009, prepared by ELM

This Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was prepared on behalf of Toll Gowanus, LLC

and was submitted to both the NYCDEP and the NYSDEC. The RAP was

prepared to allow for the redevelopment of the property in accordance with

the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) process and the

Environmental Impact Statement for the Site. The RAP was based on Phase II

investigations that were completed for the property. The proposed remedial

actions were designed to address “hot-spots” of petroleum-related VOCs

and SVOCs, and PAHs associated with the historic urban fill.

Two alternatives for in-situ remediation, soil stabilization or chemical

treatment of the “hot-spot” at the 365 Bond Street sites was proposed. The

method of soil stabilization proposed was to mix the soils with portland

cement and bentonite clay and the effectiveness of this remedy was to be

evaluated using a bench-scale mixing study and post-remedial sampling of

the stabilized mass. The RAP proposed that soil stabilization would be

completed from the surface to 7 feet bgs (elevation corresponding to 2 feet

into the groundwater table).

Pending the results of the soil-stabilization bench-scale study which would

determine the viability of this remedy, a second in-situ remedy of chemical

oxidation was proposed if soil-stabilization would not sufficiently address the

contaminants in the “hot-spots”. The specific oxidation agent identified for

the site was RegenOx which uses sodium percarbonate to oxidize the

petroleum contamination. The proposed application would be applied from

ground surface to 7 feet bgs, the results of the remedy would be monitored

via groundwater effectiveness monitoring.

In order to address potential soil vapor intrusion risks, the RAP proposed the

installation of a soil vapor barrier and sub-slab depressurization system. The

vapor barrier was specified to be a 15-mil GSE brand geomembrane. A

passive sub-slab depressurization system was proposed beneath both of the

proposed buildings.


10

Additionally, the engineering control of site capping was also identified as

one of the site remedies. It was identified that the entire site would be

capped by building foundations, concrete/asphalt walkways and sidewalks

and landscaped areas. The landscaped areas were to be capped with 2 feet

of clean fill from a certified clean fill source that would be underlain by a high

visibility demarcation barrier.

Draft Limited Phase II Environmental Investigation Report – 363 & 365 Bond

Street, dated September 2012, completed by Langan Engineering

1. A geophysical survey of the property was completed as part of this

investigation to determine if the potential extents of underground piping

associated with the former oil terminal operations and to complete utility

markouts at the proposed test boring locations.

2. Soil borings confirmed that a layer of historic fill consisting of sand and

silt is present from the surface to between 9 and 18 feet bgs at 365

Bond Street. A clay layer was observed underlying the historic fill in all

but one boring (LSB-11). Groundwater was generally observed to be

between 3 to 5 feet bgs at 365 Bond Street.

3. Groundwater was measured at approximately 8 feet below sidewalk

elevation. There is a 6 foot fluctuation between high and low tide at the

mouth of Gowanus Bay (entrance to the canal) and it is expected that the

groundwater level is effected by to tidal changes. Based on the results of

previous reports, the groundwater flow direction is towards the canal to the

east.

4. PID readings above background were observed in all six borings ranging from

0 ppm to 1,598 ppm. PID readings peaked at 352 ppm at 5.5 feet bgs in

LSB-11, 380 ppm at 15 feet bgs in LSB-12, 1,064 ppm at 5.5 feet bgs in LSB-

13, 1,598 ppm at 6.5 feet bgs in LSB-14, 347 ppm at 4 feet bgs in LSB-15,

and 505 ppm at 4.5 feet in LSB-16. LNAPL was observed in LSB-16 at 3.5

feet bgs Petroleum odors were observed in LSB-11 at 4 feet bgs, in LSB-12

at 14.5 to 15 feet bgs, in LSB-13 at 1.5 feet bgs, and in LSB-14 at 4 to 7 feet

bgs.


11

5. Soil analytical results detected exceedances to the UUOs for the VOC

acetone in the LSB-12, LSB-13 and LSB-15 locations. No other detections

above UUOs were identified. SVOCs were analyzed in the LSB-14, LSB-15

and LSB-16 soil samples only. No exceedances to the UUOs were detected

in the samples collected from the LSB-15 and LSB-16 locations.

Benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(b)fluoranthene chrysene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

and indeno(1,2,3,-c,d)pyrene were detected above Residential, Restricted

Residential and Restricted Commercial RUOs in the LSB-14 sample.

Additionally, benzo(a)pyrene was detected above the Restricted Industrial

RUOs in the LSB-14 sample.

6. Acetone and isopropyl benzene were detected in groundwater above the

NYSDEC GWQS at the LMW-2 location. Fluorene, dibenzofuran and

anthracene was detected below the groundwater quality standards at the

LMW-1 and LMW-2 locations. Both LMW-1 and LMW-2 are located with the

former dry cleaner area.

7. Tetrachloroethene (5.2 microgram per cubic meter [µg/m3] at LSV-6,

25 µg/m3 at LSV-7 and <44 µg/m3 at LSV-8) was detected in all three soil

vapor samples. Trichloroethylene was detected in the LSV-6 and LSV-7

samples at 1.6 µg/m3 and 2.1 µg/m3 respectively. Additionally, exceedances

of the NYSDOH and USEPA criteria were detected in all of the samples for

BTEX compounds.

Draft Gowanus Canal Remedial Investigation Report – dated January 2011,

completed by HDR Inc., CH2MHill, and GRB Environmental Services,

Inc., prepared for the United States Environmental Protection Agency

The results of the USEPA Remedial Investigation of the Gowanus Canal in

the areas of the site were presented in a January 2011 Gowanus Canal

Remedial Investigation Report. As part of the investigation, coal tar impacts

were identified within the canal adjacent to the 365 Bond Street. Soil from a

neighboring property that was saturated with NAPL was analyzed for

fingerprint analysis. Based on the results of this analysis the NAPL was

determined to be coal tar.


12

In a letter dated September 2012, the USEPA identified that groundwater

monitoring wells were installed on the 365 Bond Street (MW-5 and MW-6)

property. A copy of the letter is provided in Appendix C. According to

Appendix O of the 2011 USEPA Remedial Investigation Report, MW-36 and

MW-43 were installed to a depth of approximately 38-feet b.g.s., and MW-5

and MW-6 were installed to a depth of approximately 35-feet b.g.s.

(approximately 30 feet below the water table) to assess the potential of deep

impacts to the canal from the sites. Based on the results of their

investigation and the investigation completed by PW Grosser in 2011, it was

determined that NAPL does not impact the subject property at 365 Bond

Street.

2.4 Data Usability

ELM Phase II ESA Data Usability

The method detection limit (MDL) is the lowest concentration that can be

qualitatively identified by the method being used for analysis. Method

detection limits for VOCs (1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,1-

dichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethene, 1,2-

dichloroethene (cis), 1,2-dichloroethene (trans), acetone, benzene, carbon

tetrachloride, chloroform, ethylbenzene, 2-butanone, toluene, methylene chloride,

trichloroethene, tetrachloroethene, vinyl chloride, and total xylenes) were

reported above the UUOs, Residential RUOs, or Restricted Residential RUOs.

The method detection limits for pesticides (4-4’-DDT, DDE, aldrin, and dieldrin)

were above the UUOs or Residential RUOs in several samples collected from

the 365 Bond Street site. The exceedance of the method detection limits in the

soil samples is likely due to the moisture content of the soil sample that was

collected. As the site has been characterized as being impacted with both VOC

and SVOCs in the areas where elevated detection limits were noted in the soil

samples the elevated MDLs do not affect the delineation results and the data

is usable as provided.


13

Langan Phase II Investigation Data Usability

The MDL for the VOCs 1,4-dioxane, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methylene

chloride, cis-1,-dichloroethylene and vinyl chloride in soil were reported above

the UUOs. As the MDLs for these compounds were only in exceedance of the

UUOs, it can be concluded that that data is usable as provided.

MDLs were reported in groundwater above GWQS for 1,2-dibromo-3-

chloropropane, 1,4-dioxane, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 4-nitrophenol, hexachlorobenzene,

hexachlorobutadiene, hexachleorcyclopendtadiene and nitrobenzene as part of the

Phase II investigation. The analytical data was reviewed to determine why the

MDLs of certain compounds exceeded the GQS as discussed above. There

were no dilutions applied to any of the groundwater samples so it was

determined that the MDLs reported for the compounds discussed above are

the lowest concentration that the laboratory equipment is capable of

detecting. Based on this information, it can be concluded that that data is

usable as provided.

2.5 Summary of Previous Environmental Investigations

Based on the results identified in the previous sections, the delineation of

soil and groundwater impacts has been completed; however, additional soil

and groundwater investigation activities will be completed to further

characterize the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions and to further

limit the areas of excavation that are proposed. The following section

provides an AOC specific summary of the results of the previous

environmental investigations.

Petroleum Impacted Hotspot

As result of the Phase II investigations completed by ELM, a petroleum

impacted “hotspot” was identified at the Site.

AOC 4

As part of the ELM Phase II investigation for the 365 Bond Street property, 10

soil borings were completed at evenly spaced intervals to determine if the

historic use of the property as an industrial and manufacturing facility had

impacted the site. Five of these borings were completed as groundwater

monitoring wells. Generally soil samples were collected from within the shallow

overburden fill material (vadose zone) between 1 to 6 feet bgs and below the

groundwater table (saturated zone) between 6 to 13 feet bgs Elevated


14

concentrations of PAHs and metals above NYSDEC RUOs were detected in both

the shallow vadose zone and the saturated zone. In six of the twenty soil

samples collected, PAHs and metals were detected in exceedance of the

Restricted Industrial RUOs. Based on these results, the impacts observed

within the fill material were consistent with those typically associated with

historic fill. The VOCs acetone, benzene, ethylbenzene, 2-butanone, methylene

chloride, toluene, vinyl chloride, and total xylenes were detected above the

UUOs were detected in six of the samples collected within the vadose zone.

Additionally, elevated concentrations of benzene were detected above the

Residential RUOs in one of the samples collected.

Petroleum impacts (staining, odors, elevated PID readings) were identified in all

10 boring locations. LNAPL was not reported in any of the boring locations.

Benzene and phenol were detected above the NYSDEC GWQS in PZ-1 and an

elevated concentration of the pesticide 4,4’-DDT were detected in groundwater

at MW-4. Concentrations of metals (iron, magnesium, and sodium) above

GWQS were detected in groundwater at MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-5,

and PZ-1. PCBs were not detected above GWQS in any of the groundwater

samples collected.

Based on these results ELM prepared a RAP dated February 2009 that

proposed an area of soil stabilization on the eastern portion of the 365 Bond

Street property (AOC 4) to address the VOC impacts that were reported.

Additional sampling was completed in the AOC-4 location to provide further

delineation of petroleum impacted soils in these areas. The results revealed that

SVOCs were detected above the RUO for Residential and Industrial use;

however, the exceedances consisted of low concentrations (less than 10 ppm)

of PAH compounds. The presence of these PAHs at these concentrations is

consistent with the presence of historic fill which has been documented site

wide. The presence of LNAPL was not noted historically; however, it was

observed between four to 5 feet bgs in the LSB-16 location. Groundwater

results from this area did not exceed the NYSDEC GWQS.


15

Soil gas sample results from sample location LSV-8 revealed that elevated

concentrations of PCE are present in AOC 4 at low levels. Additionally,

exceedances of the NYSDOH and USEPA criteria were detected in all of the

samples for BTEX compounds.

Based on the results of the previous investigations that have been completed for

this AOC, additional soil and groundwater delineation to further refine the

excavation area extents is proposed as discussed in Section 3.1. It should be

noted that both PCE and TCE were not identified in above their respective

criteria in any of the soil or groundwater samples collected within this area.

Based on the presence of elevated concentrations of PCE and TCE in soil vapor

additional soil and groundwater sampling that is proposed to delineate areas of

concern (LSB-5 through LSB-10, LSB-22, LSB-23, LSB-24, LMW-6 and LMW-7)

will also be used to confirm that there is no on-site source of chlorinated VOCs.

Dry Cleaner (AOC-6)

Based on an interview with the current owner of the 365 Bond Street, a dry

cleaning facility operated within the western most portion of the building.

Previous investigation activities completed by ELM included the sampling of

one temporary well (PZ-1) in the area of the former dry cleaner area (AOC-6).

Benzene was detected above GWQS at this location, but no evidence of

impacts related to dry cleaning operations was noted. As part of this Phase II

Investigation, one soil boring (LSB-11) and one soil gas sample (LSV-6) were

collected in the area of the dry cleaners and two borings (LB-12 and LB-13) and

two monitoring wells (LMW-2) and LMW-1 were completed at locations

downgradient of the former dry cleaners. An additional soil gas sample (LSV-7)

was also collected in the building area downgradient of the former dry cleaning

area. Chlorinated VOCs were not detected in any of the soil or groundwater

samples collected. Low levels of PCE and TCE were detected in the soil gas

sample collected in the area of the former dry cleaning operations (LSV-6) with

higher PCE concentrations detected at the downgradient LSV-7 location.

Based on these results, a release associated with the operations of the

365 Bond Street building as a dry cleaner was not identified.


16

Based on the results of the previous investigation activities, soil and

groundwater impacts from the former dry cleaning operations were not

observed. Additionally, only low level soil vapor impacts were observed. Based

on these results no further investigation of this area is being proposed.

Historic Fill

Based on the results of shallow soil sampling completed throughout the

three parcels, historic fill material is present above the confining clay layer at

each of the sites. This fill material is impacted by PAHs, SVOCs and metals

at concentrations typical of historic urban fill. As the fill material is located

site wide, further delineation of this material is not proposed. The presence

of fill material will be addressed by development of a Construction Soil

Management Plan and capping associated with redevelopment of the site.

3.0 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

3.1 Investigation Rationale

Soil, Soil Vapor, and Groundwater

An investigation of soil, soil vapor and groundwater is proposed to delineate

previously identified “hot spots” to allow for the mass excavation of this

material, and to provide further characterization of soil and groundwater at

the Site and comply with OER’s updated practices. The rationale for the

borings, soil vapor locations and groundwater wells is as follows:

Seven borings will be completed at the Site to address the following AOCs

and to fill in data gaps:

AOC-4: Proposed Excavation Area ‟ 365 Bond Street;

AOC-6: Former Dry Cleaners.

A summary of the soil sample locations and sampling rationale is provided in

Table 5. The proposed sampling locations are shown on Figure 7. A total of

7 shallow soil samples (0- to 2 foot bgs interval) will be collected. These will

provide site-wide characterization of the shallow soil at the Site. This is

important due to the proposed slab being between approximately 0.5 to 5.5-

feet above existing grade. This data will be used to augment the previous


17

investigation soil analytical results that were biased to the soil groundwater

interface.

In addition 7 soil samples will be collected from at the groundwater interface

or locations that exhibit evidence of impact to provide vertical delineation of

selected AOCs.

The following provides the detailed rationale for the collection of all 14 soil

samples, the installation of one additional groundwater monitoring well, the

collection of 8 groundwater samples and the collection of 5 soil vapor

samples that are proposed as part of this RIWP.

Two samples will be collected from borings LSB-13, LSB-17, LSB-18,

LSB-19, LSB-26 and LSB-28 will address the overall site assessment of

soil (for a total of 12 samples) at 365 Bond Street. Boring LSB-26 will also

address the overall site assessment of soil and will replace the missing

groundwater monitoring well MW-2 for overall assessment of groundwater

at the 365 Bond Street site. LSB-28 will also be completed to assess the

horizontal extents of AOC-6.

Two samples will be collected from LSB-20 to address the overall site

assessment of soil at 365 Bond Street and the horizontal and vertical

delineation of AOC-4.

As mentioned above, the two samples that will be collected from LSB-28

will be to address the overall site assessment of soil at 365 Bond Street

and the horizontal and vertical delineation of AOC-6.

One soil boring (LSB-26) will be completed as a monitoring well (LMW-8) to

complete the site wide assessment of groundwater.

Monitoring well LMW-8 will be installed to a maximum depth of 15 feet bgs

or to a depth that corresponds to two-feet into the clay layer and with

sufficient screen length to allow the wells to be screened across the

groundwater table so that the potential presence of LNAPL can be assessed.

Additionally, samples will be collected from previously installed wells as

discussed below:


18

Monitoring wells LMW-1, LMW-2, LMW-3, LMW-4, LMW-5, MW-1, and PZ-1

will address the overall site assessment of groundwater at 365 Bond Street.

A total of 5 soil vapor sampling points will be installed throughout the Site.

Two subslab soil vapor samples (LSV-9 and LSV-23) will be collected from

within the building at 365 Bond Street to further assess overall site

conditions and address delineation of impacts at AOC-6. The soil vapor

samples collected from outside the structures located at 365 Bond Street

will consist of LSV-10, LSV-24, and LSV-25. One sample will be collected

from a depth of five feet bgs at each location. These three samples will

address the overall site assessment of soil vapor and, additionally, LSV-25

will assess potential impacts at AOC-4.

3.2 Investigation Procedures

Prior to invasive work, a one-call utility mark-out will be completed in accordance

with local laws to locate buried electric, natural gas, telecommunication utilities, etc.

In addition, a private utility mark-out contractor will locate sub-surface utilities

and structures near the proposed test boring locations, so these

investigations can be performed in locations clear of such sub-surface

elements. All soil borings, groundwater monitoring wells and soil vapor points,

with exception of subslab soil vapor samples, will be installed by a qualified

environmental driller. All field activities including the installation of borings,

monitoring wells, soil vapor points as well as the sampling of these media will be

completed by a geologist/engineer under the supervision of a QEP.

Soil Sampling

A qualified environmental driller will advance 7 investigative borings. The on-site

geologist/engineer will screen the soil samples for environmental impacts and

collect environmental samples for laboratory analysis. Site work will comply with

the safety guidelines outlined in the HASP (Appendix D).

The investigative borings will be advanced to the depth of 15 feet below sidewalk

grade using a direct-push drilling method. The proposed boring location plan is

provided on Figure 7. Soil will be collected continuously to the boring termination

depth with a Geoprobe macrocore sampler in two, four- or five-foot increments

using disposable acetate sleeves. Each sample will be screened for organic

vapors with a photo-ionization detector (PID) and evaluated for visual and


19

olfactory indications of environmental impacts. Soil descriptions will be recorded

in a field log.

A maximum of 7 soil samples will be collected from zero to two feet below ground

surface (based on the development scenario of a slab on grade development) and 7

soil samples will be collected from the groundwater interface or locations that

exhibit evidence of impact (an overall total of 14 soil samples). Samples will not be

composite samples but will be discrete grab samples. The proposed soil sampling

rationale is provided in Table 5.

Groundwater Sampling

Groundwater elevation is expected between 3 to 5 feet below current grade at

365 Bond Street. One soil boring will be converted into a permanent

groundwater monitoring well by inserting 2-inch diameter PVC well screen and

riser into the open borehole. The proper screen size annulus around the well

screen will be filled with clean, appropriately sized silica sand. In silty conditions,

smaller well screen slot size will be used.

In addition to the collection of the groundwater sample at location installed as

part of this RI, groundwater samples will also be collected from existing wells

(LMW-1, LMW-2, LMW-3, LMW-4, LMW-5, PZ-1, and MW-1). At each monitoring

well location, one representative groundwater sample will be collected from each

well by a Langan geologist/ engineer using a peristaltic pump and dedicated Teflon

tubing. Sampling will be conducted in accordance with NYSDEC Draft DER-10

Technical Guidance for Site Investigation and Remediation, dated December 2002,

and Sampling Guidelines and Protocols, dated March 1991. See Figure 11 for

proposed monitoring well locations.

Soil Vapor Sampling

A total of 2 indoor sub-slab and 3 exterior soil vapor samples (for an overall total of 5

samples) will be collected from the proposed soil vapor locations on the Sample

Location Plan (Figure 5). All samples will be collected in accordance with the Final

Guidance for Evaluating Soil Vapor Intrusion in the State of New York (NYSDOH

October 2006). Conditions in the field may require adjustment to the sampling

locations. Groundwater ranges between 3 and 5 feet bgs across the subject

property and, as such, the vapor implants will be set at a depth of 4 feet bgs or at

least 1-foot above the capillary fringe.


20

Sub-slab soil vapor points will be constructed by drilling a 0.5-inch hole

through the slab using a Bosch hammer drill. Teflon-lined polyethylene

tubing will be installed approximately six-inches beneath the slab and sealed

using modeling clay. Deep soil vapor points will be constructed by attached

a soil vapor screen to Teflon-lined polyethylene tubing and lowering the

screen into a borehole to the desired sampling depth. Clean sand will be

used to create a 1-foot sampling interval from the bottom of the 6-inch

screen to the 6-inches above the top of the screen. The sampling interval

will then be sealed by a layer of bentonite clay.

Samples will be collected in Summa canisters which have been certified clean by

the laboratory and analyzed by using USEPA Method TO-15. Flow rate of both

purging and sampling will not exceed 0.2 L/min. Sampling will occur for the duration

of two hours. Note that sampling duration should be a minimum of two hours or

reflect the exposure scenario for sub-slab samples. A sample log sheet will be

maintained summarizing sample identification, date and time of sample collection,

sampling depth, identity of samplers, sampling methods and devices, soil vapor

purge volumes, volume of the soil vapor extracted, vacuum of canisters before and

after the samples are collected, apparent moisture content of the sampling zone,

and chain of custody protocols.

As part of the vapor intrusion evaluation, a tracer gas will be used in accordance

with NYSDOH protocols to serve as a quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)

device to verify the integrity of the soil vapor probe seal. Helium will be used as the

tracer gas and a bucket will serve to keep it in contact with the probe during testing.

A portable monitoring device will be used to analyze a sample of soil vapor for the

tracer prior to sampling. If the tracer sample results show a significant presence of

the tracer, the probe seals will be adjusted to prevent infiltration. As the conclusion

of the sampling round, tracer monitoring will be performed a second time to confirm

the integrity of the probe seals.

Investigation Derived Waste

All soil cuttings generated during boring and monitoring well installations will be

containerized in a clearly labeled DOT-approved 55-gallon drum for future off-site

disposal.


21

Development and purge water from developing and sampling monitoring wells will

be containerized in a clearly labeled DOT-approved 55-gallon drum for future off-site

disposal.

Disposable sampling equipment including, spoons, gloves, bags, paper towels, etc.

that came in contact with environmental media will be double bagged and disposed

as municipal trash in a facility trash dumpster as non-hazardous trash.

3.3 Sample Analysis

Soil and groundwater samples will be submitted to a New York State

Department of Health (NYSDOH) Environmental Laboratory Accreditation

Program (ELAP)-certified laboratory for the analysis of:

„ Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260;

„ Semi-volatile organic compounds by EPA Method 8270;

„ Pesticides/PCBs by EPA Method 8081/8082; and

„ Target Analyte List metals by EPA Method 6010;

All groundwater samples will be analyzed for both filtered and unfiltered metals.

Soil vapor samples will be analyzed for VOCs by using USEPA Method TO-15.

3.4 Reporting

A Remedial Investigation Report (RIR) will be prepared following completion

of the field activities and receipt of the laboratory data. The Report will be

prepared using the OER template for the Phase II ESI Report and will provide

detailed summaries of the investigative findings and soil and groundwater

analytical results compared to the NYSDEC Part 375-6.8(a) Unrestricted Used

Soil Cleanup Objectives, appropriate Part 375-6.8(b) Restricted Soil Cleanup

Objectives and NYSDEC Part 703 Groundwater Quality Standards (GQS)

(class GA) or Division of Water Technical and Operational Guidance Series

(TOGS) 1.1.1 Ambient Water Quality Standards (AWQS). The Report will

include an updated Site Plan and remedial recommendations, as warranted.


22

4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

4.1 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures

QA/QC procedures will be used to provide performance information with regard to

accuracy, precision, sensitivity, representation, completeness, and comparability

associated with the sampling and analysis for this investigation. Field QA/QC

procedures will be used (1) to document that samples are representative of

actual conditions at the Site and (2) identify possible cross-contamination from

field activities or sample transit. Laboratory QA/QC procedures and analyses will

be used to demonstrate whether analytical results have been biased either by

interfering compounds in the sample matrix, or by laboratory techniques that

may have introduced systematic or random errors to the analytical process. A

summary of the field and laboratory QA/QC procedures is provided below.

4.2 Field QA/QC

Field QA/QC will include the following procedures:

„ Calibration of field equipment, including PID, on a daily basis;

„ Analysis of trip blank (VOCs only) and duplicate samples;

„ Use of dedicated and/or disposable field sampling equipment;

„ Proper sample handling and preservation;

„ Proper sample chain of custody documentation; and,

„ Completion of report logs.

The above procedures will be executed as follows:

„ Three duplicate samples (one soil, one groundwater, and one soil vapor), one

soil matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate sample, one groundwater matrix

spike/matrix spike duplicate sample, two field blanks (one soil and one

groundwater), one trip blank (groundwater or soil preserved with methanol)

per shipped cooler containing groundwater samples to be analyzed for VOCs,

and one ambient air sample (soil vapor) per day that soil vapor samples are

being collected will be collected to evaluate field sampling precision or

reproducibility of measurements of the same parameter under the given set

of conditions;


23

„ Disposable sampling equipment, including acetate sleeves, latex gloves, and

disposable bailers (or sample tubing), will be used to minimize cross-

contamination between samples;

„ For each of the parameters analyzed, a sufficient sample volume will be

collected to adhere to the specific analytical protocol, and provide sufficient

sample for reanalysis if necessary;

„ Because plasticizers and other organic compounds inherent in plastic

containers may contaminate samples requiring organic analysis, samples will

be collected in glass containers, with the exception of the nitrate-preserved

groundwater sample for metals analysis;

„ Appropriate sample preservation techniques, including cold temperature

storage at 4º C, will be utilized to ensure that the analytical parameters

concentrations do not change between the time of sample collection and

analysis; and,

„ Samples will be analyzed prior to the expiration of the respective holding

time for each analytical parameter to ensure the integrity of the analytical

results.

4.3 Sample Custody

Sample handling in the field will conform to appropriate sample custody

procedures. Field custody procedures include proper sample identification,

chain-of-custody forms, and packaging and shipping procedures. Sample labels

will be attached to all sampling bottles before field activities begin to ensure

proper sample identification. Each label will identify the site and sample location.

Styrofoam or bubble wrap will be used to absorb shock and prevent breakage of

sample containers. Ice or ice packs will be placed in between the plastic bags for

sample preservation purposes.

After each sample is collected and appropriately identified, the following

information will be entered into the chain-of-custody form:

„ Site name and address;

„ Sampler(s)’ name(s) and signature(s);

„ Names and signatures of persons involved in the chain of possession of

samples;

„ Sample number;


24

„ Number of containers;

„ Sample location;

„ Date and time of collection;

„ Type of sample, sample matrix and analyses requested;

„ Preservation used (if any); and,

„ Any pertinent field data collected (pH, temperature, conductivity, Dissolved

Oxygen [DO]).

The sampler will sign and date the “Relinquished” blank space prior to removing

one copy of the custody form and sealing the remaining copies of the form in a

Ziploc plastic bag taped to the underside of the sample cooler lid. The sample

cooler will be sealed with tape prior to delivery or shipment to the laboratory.

4.4 Report Logs

Field logs and borings logs will be completed during the course of this

investigation. A field log will be completed on a daily basis which will describe

all field activities including:

„ Project number, name, manager, and address;

„ The date and time;

„ The weather conditions;

„ On-site personnel and associated affiliations;

„ Description of field activities; and,

„ Pertinent sample collection information including sample identification

numbers, description of samples, location of sampling points, number of

samples taken, method of sample collection and any factors that may affect

its quality, time of sample collection, name of collector, and field screening

results.

A boring log will be completed for each boring and will include the following

information:

„ Project number, name, manager, and location;

„ The date and time;

„ Drilling company and method used;

„ Boring number;

„ Total boring depth and water table depths; and,


25

„ Pertinent soil sample information including sample number, interval, depth,

amount recovered, color, composition, percent moisture, visual and olfactory

observations of contamination, and PID readings.

4.5 Laboratory QA/QC

AN ELAP-certified laboratory will be used for all sample analyses. The laboratory

will follow the following QA/QC protocols. All samples will be delivered to the

laboratory within 24 hours of sample collection. Samples will be received by

laboratory personnel, who will inspect the sample cooler(s) to check the integrity

of the custody seals. The cooler(s) will then be opened, the samples unpackaged,

and the information on the chain-of-custody form examined. If the shipped

samples match those described on the chain-of-custody form, the laboratory

sample custodian will sign and date the form on the next “Received” blank and

assume responsibility for the samples. If problems are noted with the sample

shipment, the laboratory custodian will sign the form and record problems in the

“Remarks” box. The custodian will then immediately notify the Project Manager

so appropriate follow-up steps can be implemented on a timely basis.

A record of the information detailing the handling of a particular sample through

each stage of analysis will be maintained by the laboratory. The record will

include:

„ Job reference, sample matrix, sample number, and date sampled;

„ Date and time received by laboratory, holding conditions, and analytical

parameters;

„ Extraction date, time and extractor’s initials (if applicable), analysis date, time,

and analyst’s initials; and,

„ QA batch number, date reviewed, and reviewer’s initials.

5.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN (HASP)

5.1 Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

The investigation Health and Safety Plan (HASP) is included in Appendix D. The

Site Safety Officer will be the geologist/engineer responsible for overseeing and

completing investigation activities. Investigative work performed under this

Work Plan will be in full compliance with applicable health and safety laws and


26

regulations, including Site and OSHA worker safety requirements and

HAZWOPER requirements. Confined space entry, if any, will comply with OSHA

requirements and industry standards and will address potential risks. The parties

performing the investigation work will ensure that performance of work is in

compliance with the HASP and applicable laws and regulations.

All field personnel involved in investigation activities will participate in training

required under 29 CFR 1910.120, including 40-hour hazardous waste operator

training and annual 8-hour refresher training. Site Safety Officer will be

responsible for maintaining workers training records.

Personnel entering any exclusion zone will be trained in the provisions of the

HASP and be required to sign a HASP acknowledgment. Site-specific training

will be provided to field personnel. Additional safety training may be added

depending on the tasks performed. Emergency telephone numbers will be

posted at the site location before any work begins. A safety meeting will be

conducted before each shift begins. Topics to be discussed include task hazards

and protective measures (physical, chemical, environmental); emergency

procedures; PPE levels and other relevant safety topics. Meetings will be

documented in a log book or specific form. Potential on-site chemicals of

concern include VOCs, SVOCs, pesticides/PCBs, and heavy metals. Information

fact sheets for each contaminant group and/or MSDS’ are included in the HASP.

An emergency contact sheet with names and phone numbers for all pertinent

project personnel as well as regulatory hotline information is included in the

HASP. That document will define the specific project contacts for use in case of

emergency.

\\langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013-07 - NYSDEC RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\365 Bond St_NYSDEC RIWP (Final 2012-11-09,

Rev.2013-07-10).doc


TABLES

Table 1HISTORIC SAMPLING SUMMARY

PROPOSED BOND STREET DEVELOPMENT

Brooklyn, New York

Matrix Sample Location Sample Depth (ft bgs) Analysis

B-1/3-5 3.0'-5.0'

B-1/5-7 5.0'-7.0'

B-2/3-5 3.0'-5.0'

B-2/5-7 5.0'-7.0'

B-3/5-7 5.0'-7.0'

B-3/11-13 11.0'-13.0'

B-4/1-3 1.0'-3.0'

B-4/5-7 5.0'-7.0'

B-5/0.5-2.5 0.5'-2.5'

B-5/4.5-6.5 4.5'-6.5'

MW-1/5-7 5.0'-7.0'

MW-1/17-19 17.0'-19.0'

MW-2/3-5 3.0'-5.0'

MW-2/5-7 5.0'-7.0'

MW-3/3-5 3.0'-5.0'

MW-3/5-7 5.0'-7.0'

MW-4/1-3 1.0'-3.0'

MW-4/3-5 3.0'-5.0'

MW-5/1-3 1.0'-3.0'

MW-5/5-7 5.0'-7.0'

MW-1 ---

MW-2 ---

MW-3 ---

MW-4 ---

MW-5 ---

PZ-1 ---

Matrix Sample Location Sample Depth (ft bgs) Analysis

LSB-11 5.0' - 5.5'

LSB-12 14.5' - 15.0'

LSB-13 13.5' - 14.0'

LSB-14 3.0' - 5.0'

LSB-15 3.0' - 5.0' VOCs

3.0' - 5.0' SVOCs

23.0' - 25.0'

LMW-1 ---

Groundwater LMW-2 ---

LMW-3 ---

LSV-6 subslab

LSV-7 subslab

LSV-8 2.0'

VOCs

SVOCs

Pesticides

PCBs

Metals

Langan Engineering Phase II Due Diligence Sampling Summary

LSB-16

Soil

VOCs

Soil

Soil

Groundwater

Environmental Liability Management of New York, LLC Phase II Sampling Summary

365 BOND STREET

VOCs

SVOCs

Soil Vapor VOCs

\\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013-07 - OER Phase II RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Tables\Table 1 - Historical Sample Summary-TABLE 2 - FINAL

Page1of 1

7/10/2013

8:21 AM

Table 2SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS


365 Bond Street

Brooklyn, New York

Consultant:

Sample ID: SUBPART 375-6 (Revised Brownfields) # B-1/3-5 B-1/5-7 B-2/3-5 B-2/5-7 B-3/5-7 B-3/11-13 B-4/1-3 B-4/5-7 B-5/0.5-2.5 B-5/4.5-6.5 MW-1/5-7 MW-1/17-19 MW-2/3-5 MW-2/5-7

Laboratory Sample Number: Protection of Public Health 207707-007 207707-008 207714-005 207714-006 207714-007 207714-008 207714-009 200714-010 20771-011 207714-012 207707-001 207707-002 207707-003 207707-004

Sampling Date: 10/1/2004 10/1/2004 10/4/2004 10/4/2004 10/5/2004 10/5/2004 10/5/2004 10/5/2004 10/5/2004 10/5/2004 10/1/2004 10/1/2004 10/4/2004 10/4/2004

Sampling Depth (ft): 3-5 5-7 3 -5 5-7 5-7 11-13 1-3 5-7 0.5-2.5 4.5-6.5 5-7 17-19 3-5 5-7

VOC Sampling Depth (ft):

Units: (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q

VOCs

1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.02 2.3 3.1 30 60 0.077 U 0.076 U 0.075 U 0.099 U 0.076 U 0.11 U 0.082 U 0.0006 U 0.0006 U 0.073 U 0.08 U 0.11 U 0.079 U 0.082 U

1,2-Dichloroethene (cis) 156-59-2 0.25 59 100 500 1,000 0.089 U 0.088 U 0.087 U 0.110 U 0.088 U 0.120 U 0.095 U 0.0003 U 0.0003 U 0.084 U 0.093 U 0.130 U 0.092 U 0.094 UAcetone 67-64-1 0.05 100 100 500 1,000 0.24 U 0.24 U 0.24 U 0.31 U 0.24 U 0.34 U 0.26 U 0.0110 J 0.0520 0.23 U 0.25 U 0.35 U 0.25 U 0.26 U

Benzene 71-43-2 0.06 2.9 4.8 44 89 0.066 U 0.065 U 0.064 U 0.084 U 0.065 U 0.092 U 0.07 U 0.0006 U 0.0010 J 0.67 0.068 U 0.095 U 0.068 U 0.069 U

Carbon Disulfide 75-15-0 --- --- --- --- --- 0.045 U 0.045 U 0.044 U 0.058 U 0.044 U 0.062 U 0.048 U 0.0025 J 0.0130 0.042 U 0.047 U 0.065 U 0.046 U 0.047 U

Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 1 30 41 390 780 0.059 U 0.23 J 0.058 U 0.076 U 0.058 U 0.082 U 0.063 U 0.0014 J 0.0350 0.38 J 0.062 U 0.086 U 0.061 U 0.063 U

Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK / 2-butanone) 78-93-3 0.12 100 100 500 1,000 0.2 U 0.2 U 0.19 U 0.25 U 0.19 U 0.27 U 0.21 U 0.0007 U 0.00067 U 0.19 U 0.21 U 0.29 U 0.2 U 0.21 U

Methylene chloride 75-09-2 0.05 51 100 500 1,000 0.31 JB 0.27 JB 0.27 J 0.31 JB 0.27 JB 0.36 JB 0.23 JB 0.0034 JB 0.0073 B 0.26 JB 0.26 JB 0.45 JB 0.28 JB 0.29 JB

Toluene 108-88-3 0.7 100 100 500 1,000 0.044 U 0.044 U 0.043 U 0.057 U 0.043 U 0.061 U 0.047 U 0.0009 J 0.0070 1.1 0.046 U 0.064 U 0.045 U 0.047 UTrichloroethene 79-01-6 0.47 10 21 200 400 0.097 U 0.096 U 0.095 U 0.120 U 0.096 U 0.140 U 0.100 U 0.0003 U 0.0003 U 0.092 U 0.100 U 0.140 U 0.100 U 0.100 UVinyl Chloride 75-01-4 0.02 0.21 0.9 13 27 0.068 U 0.067 U 0.066 U 0.087 U 0.067 U 0.095 U 0.073 U 0.0003 U 0.0003 U 0.064 U 0.071 U 0.099 U 0.07 U 0.072 U

Xylene (total) 1330-20-7 0.26 100 100 500 1,000 0.12 J 0.19 J 0.110 U 0.140 U 0.110 U 0.150 U 0.120 U 0.0062 0.1300 4.9 0.110 U 0.160 U 0.110 U 0.120 U

SVOCs

2-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 --- --- --- --- --- 3.100 1.600 0.170 J 0.140 J 0.170 J 0.250 J 9.800 0.450 J 0.400 J 3.900 J 0.680 J 0.092 U 2.900 1.400

Acenaphthene 83-32-9 20 100 100 500 1,000 3.200 0.590 J 0.210 J 0.083 U 0.064 U 0.120 J 1.200 J 0.430 J 0.240 U 3.700 J 1.500 0.095 U 0.850 0.420

Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 100 100 100 500 1,000 0.370 U 0.190 U 0.046 U 0.062 U 0.048 U 0.068 U 0.210 U 0.094 U 0.180 U 2.600 J 0.840 0.071 U 0.580 J 0.051 U

Anthracene 120-12-7 100 100 100 500 1,000 2.100 J 0.440 J 0.250 J 0.120 J 0.077 J 0.110 J 0.600 J 0.320 J 0.240 U 7.900 0.910 0.095 U 0.520 J 0.320 J

Benzo (a) anthracene 56-55-3 1 1 1 5.6 11 4.400 0.600 J 0.550 0.230 J 0.140 J 0.200 J 0.640 J 2.600 0.280 J 11.000 1.900 0.078 U 0.670 J 0.490

Benzo (a) pyrene 50-32-8 1 1 1 1 1.1 4.300 0.550 J 0.520 0.240 J 0.140 J 0.230 J 0.770 J 1.900 0.180 U 9.700 1.900 0.230 J 0.720 J 0.540

Benzo (b) fluoranthene 205-99-2 1 1 1 5.60 11 3.300 0.440 U 0.370 0.290 J 0.110 U 0.150 U 0.800 J 0.480 J 0.410 U 12.000 1.700 0.160 U 0.410 J 0.340 J

Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 191-24-2 100 100 100 500 1,000 2.400 J 0.340 J 0.660 0.250 J 0.210 J 0.280 J 0.720 J 2.500 0.190 J 6.900 J 0.480 J 0.064 U 0.150 J 0.087 J

Benzo (k) fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.8 1 3.9 56 110 2.900 J 0.230 J 0.360 J 0.056 U 0.043 U 0.100 J 0.190 U 0.085 U 0.160 U 0.830 U 1.400 0.064 U 0.370 J 0.360 J

bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 117-81-7 --- --- --- --- --- 0.400 U 0.210 U 0.100 J 0.066 U 0.052 U 0.120 J 0.230 U 0.100 U 0.190 U 0.990 U 0.130 J 0.076 U 0.110 U 0.074 J

Carbozole 86-74-8 --- --- --- --- --- 0.840 J 0.230 U 0.055 U 0.074 U 0.057 U 0.081 U 0.250 U 0.110 U 0.220 U 3.300 J 0.190 J 0.085 U 0.120 U 0.061 U

Chrysene 218-01-9 1 1 3.9 56 110 4.900 0.690 J 0.520 0.260 J 0.170 J 0.260 J 0.870 J 3.000 0.370 J 12.000 2.200 0.073 U 0.850 0.610

Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 53-70-3 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.56 1.1 1.000 J 0.170 U 0.250 J 0.096 J 0.085 J 0.110 J 0.270 J 0.800 0.160 U 2.700 J 0.290 J 0.064 U 0.089 U 0.046 U

Dibenzofuran 132-64-9 --- --- --- --- --- 1.600 J 0.250 U 0.059 U 0.080 U 0.062 U 0.088 U 0.880 J 0.240 J 0.230 U 4.100 J 0.130 U 0.092 U 0.130 U 0.066 U

Di-n-butyl phthalate 84-74-2 --- --- --- --- --- 0.400 U 0.210 U 0.049 U 0.066 U 0.052 U 0.073 U 0.230 U 0.100 U 0.190 U 0.990 U 0.110 U 0.076 U 0.110 U 0.055 UFluoranthene 206-44-0 100 100 100 500 1,000 9.100 1.100 J 1.100 0.500 0.074 J 0.170 J 1.100 J 0.370 J 0.190 U 24.000 3.800 0.073 U 0.960 0.730

Fluorene 86-73-7 30 100 100 500 1,000 2.900 J 1.300 J 0.180 J 0.065 U 0.180 J 0.230 J 2.400 0.520 J 0.190 U 6.500 J 1.800 0.074 U 1.800 0.840

Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 0.5 0.5 5.6 11 1.800 J 0.200 J 0.450 0.200 J 0.067 J 0.120 J 0.480 J 0.550 J 0.150 U 5.500 J 0.550 J 0.059 U 0.110 J 0.079 J

Isophorone 78-59-1 --- --- --- --- --- 0.550 U 0.280 U 0.067 U 0.090 U 0.070 U 0.099 U 0.310 U 0.140 U 6.900 1.300 U 0.150 U 0.100 U 0.140 U 0.074 U

Naphthalene 91-20-3 12 100 100 500 1,000 0.520 U 0.270 U 0.200 J 0.270 0.067 U 0.100 J 1.400 J 0.130 U 0.250 U 2.900 J 0.140 U 0.098 U 0.140 U 0.071 U

o-Cresol(s) (2-Methylphenol) 95-48-7 0.33 100.00 100 500 1,000 0.810 U 0.420 U 0.099 U 0.130 U 0.100 U 0.150 U 0.460 U 0.200 U 0.390 U 2.000 U 0.220 U 0.150 U 0.210 U 0.110 U

p-Cresol(s) (4-Methylphenol) 106-44-5 0.33 34 100 500 1,000 1.600 U 0.840 U 0.200 U 2.000 0.210 U 0.300 U 0.920 U 0.410 U 0.790 U 4.000 U 0.440 U 0.310 U 0.430 U 0.220 U

Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 0.8 2.4 6.7 6.7 55 2.600 U 1.400 U 0.320 U 0.430 U 0.340 U 0.480 U 1.500 U 0.660 U 1.300 U 6.500 U 0.700 U 0.500 U 0.700 U 0.360 U

Phenanthrene 85-01-8 100 100 100 500 1,000 10.000 2.700 0.370 0.270 J 0.360 J 0.520 J 4.400 1.200 0.340 J 31.000 4.700 0.067 U 3.700 M 2.000

Phenol 108-95-2 0.33 100 100 500 1,000 0.880 U 0.450 U 0.110 U 0.150 U 0.110 U 0.160 U 0.500 U 0.220 U 0.430 U 2.200 U 0.240 U 0.170 U 0.230 U 0.120 U

Pyrene 129-00-0 100 100 100 500 1,000 11 1.7 0.96 0.4 J 0.18 J 0.35 J 1.6 J 2.7 0.28 J 23 3.5 0.079 U 1.60 1.10

Pesticides

4,4'-DDE 72-55-9 0.0033 1.8 8.9 62 120 0.00051 U 0.00051 U 0.00050 U 0.00066 U 0.00050 U 0.00072 U 0.0034 J 0.00049 U 0.00048 U 0.011 0.00053 U 0.00074 U 0.0015 J 0.00054 U

4,4'-DDT 50-29-3 0.0033 1.7 7.9 47 94 0.0024 J 0.0047 0.00036 U 0.00062 J 0.00036 U 0.00051 U 0.00040 U 0.00035 U 0.00034 U 0.00034 U 0.00038 U 0.00053 U 0.00038 U 0.0017 J

Aldrin 309-00-2 0.005 0.019 0.097 0.68 1.4 0.00042 U 0.001 J 0.00041 U 0.00054 U 0.00041 U 0.00059 U 0.00046 U 0.00040 U 0.00063 J 0.00039 U 0.00044 U 0.00061 U 0.0033 0.0027

Alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.02 0.097 0.48 3.4 6.8 0.0012 J 0.00044 J 0.00039 J 0.00042 U 0.00032 U 0.00099 J 0.001 J 0.00075 J 0.00030 U 0.00052 J 0.00034 U 0.00047 U 0.0013 J 0.0017 J

Beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.036 0.072 0.36 3 14 0.00032 U 0.00031 U 0.00031 U 0.00041 U 0.00031 U 0.00044 U 0.00034 U 0.00048 J 0.00030 U 0.00030 U 0.0019 J 0.00046 U 0.0015 J 0.00034 U

Chlordane (alpha) 5103-71-9 0.094 0.91 4.2 24 47 0.00013 U 0.00013 U 0.0031 0.0011 J 0.00025 J 0.00018 U 0.00014 U 0.0012 J 0.00012 J 0.00012 U 0.00013 U 0.00019 U 0.00013 U 0.00014 U

Chlordane (gamma) 5103-74-2 --- --- --- --- --- 0.00083 J 0.00011 U 0.001 J 0.0005 J 0.00011 U 0.00015 U 0.00012 U 0.00010 U 0.0012 J 0.00010 U 0.00037 J 0.00016 U 0.00011 U 0.00011 U

Delta-BHC 319-86-8 0.04 100.00 100 500 1,000 0.00079 J 0.00086 J 0.00012 U 0.00016 U 0.00012 U 0.00017 U 0.00013 U 0.00012 U 0.00081 J 0.00028 J 0.00024 J 0.00018 U 0.00083 J 0.0013 J

Endosulfan II 33213-65-9 2.4 4.8 24 200 920 0.0028 J 0.0036 J 0.0024 J 0.00026 U 0.00020 U 0.00028 U 0.003 J 0.0003 J 0.00065 J 0.00069 J 0.00021 U 0.00029 U 0.0021 J 0.00021 U

Endosulfan Sulfate 1031-07-8 2.4 4.8 24 200 920 0.00020 U 0.00020 U 0.0021 J 0.0012 J 0.0022 J 0.00029 U 0.0026 J 0.0018 J 0.0028 J 0.0064 0.0051 0.00030 U 0.0037 J 0.0029 J

Endrin 72-20-8 0.014 2.20 11 89 410 0.0014 J 0.0097 0.00100 U 0.00130 U 0.00100 U 0.00150 U 0.00110 U 0.00100 U 0.0014 J 0.00098 U 0.00110 U 0.00150 U 0.00110 U 0.00110 U

Endrin ketone 53494-70-5 --- --- --- --- --- 0.00017 U 0.00017 U 0.00017 U 0.00022 U 0.00017 U 0.00024 U 0.00018 U 0.00016 U 0.00016 U 0.00016 U 0.0027 J 0.00025 U 0.0061 J 0.00018 U

Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.042 0.42 2.1 15 29 0.00018 U 0.00018 U 0.00024 J 0.00023 U 0.00017 U 0.00025 U 0.00019 U 0.00017 U 0.00016 U 0.00017 U 0.00018 U 0.00032 J 0.00018 U 0.00019 U

Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 --- --- --- --- --- 0.0025 0.0065 0.00072 J 0.00053 J 0.00034 J 0.00065 J 0.0016 J 0.0016 J 0.00065 J 0.0011 J 0.00087 J 0.00020 U 0.00014 U 0.0019 J

Lindane 58-89-9 0.1 0.28 1.3 9.2 23 0.0031 0.0021 0.00018 U 0.00023 U 0.00035 J 0.00025 U 0.005 0.0025 0.00017 U 0.0064 0.002 J 0.00026 U 0.0028 0.0023

Methoxychlor 72-43-5 --- --- --- --- --- 0.018 J 0.013 J 0.0067 J 0.00320 U 0.00240 U 0.00350 U 0.00270 U 0.00240 U 0.0045 J 0.048 0.00260 U 0.00360 U 0.00260 U 0.0055 J

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 1336-36-3 0.1 1 1 1 25

Aroclor 1016 12674-11-2 0.1 1 1 1 25 0.0033 U 0.0033 U 0.0032 U 0.0043 U 0.0033 U 0.0046 U 0.0036 U 0.0032 U 0.0031 U 0.0031 U 0.0034 U 0.0048 U 0.0034 U 0.0035 U





Aroclor 1254 11097-69-1 0.1 1 1 1 25 0.0014 U 0.0014 U 0.0014 U 0.0018 U 0.0014 U 0.0020 U 0.0015 U 0.0014 U 0.0013 U 0.0013 U 0.0015 U 0.0021 U 0.0250 0.0230

Aroclor 1260 11096-82-5 0.1 1 1 1 25 0.0047 U 0.0047 U 0.0046 U 0.0060 U 0.0046 U 0.0066 U 0.0051 U 0.0130 J 0.0044 U 0.0044 U 0.0049 U 0.0068 U 0.0049 J 0.0050 U

Aroclor 1268 11100-14-4 0.1 1 1 1 25 0.0047 U 0.0047 U 0.0046 U 0.0060 U 0.0046 U 0.0066 U 0.0051 U 0.0130 J 0.0044 U 0.0044 U 0.0049 U 0.0068 U 0.0299 J 0.0230

Metals

Aluminum 7429-90-5 --- --- --- --- --- 4,170 5,050 3,070 6,130 8,090 12,900 4,910 6,920 5,170 3,360 7,490 16,500 4,780 7,870

Arsenic 7440-38-2 13 16 16 16 16 4.5 J 4.2 J 3.7 J 7.4 J 2.9 J 10.4 J 10.8 1.9 J 4.5 J 5.3 J 36 13.1 J 6.1 J 7.9 J

Barium 7440-39-3 350 350 400 400 10,000 57.4 50.9 72.8 168 59.3 35.9 87.5 52.7 70 110 83.8 32.6 58.1 100

Beryllium 7440-41-7 7.2 14 72 590 2,700 0.53 U 0.57 U 0.66 J 0.67 U 0.61 U 0.74 U 0.62 U 0.49 J 0.48 U 0.52 U 0.71 J 0.95 J 0.64 U 0.63 U

Cadmium 7440-43-9 2.5 2.5 4.3 9.3 60 1.1 U 1.1 U 1.2 U 1.3 U 1.2 U 1.5 U 1.2 U 0.96 U 0.96 U 1 U 1.4 J 1.7 U 1.3 U 1.3 U

Calcium 7440-70-2 --- --- --- --- --- 45,600 18,300 12,000 22,400 2,500 6,330 29,200 16,200 14,700 18,300 50,200 3,390 51,200 56,800

Chromium 7440-47-3 21.5 13.4 10.3 6.8 13.3 45.2 10.8 17 23.6 19.1 13.6 36.1 9.1 9.5

Cobalt 7440-48-4 --- --- --- --- --- 3.7 4.4 6.1 6.9 5.4 9.7 4.9 8 5.5 5 8.4 12.3 3 3.7

Copper 7440-50-8 50 270 270 270 10,000 19.9 24.5 45 26.9 11.8 20.2 42 14.7 26 26.6 51.2 17.4 36.7 27.2

Iron 7439-89-6 --- --- --- --- --- 9,570 10,500 8,710 9,760 12,000 33,700 15,700 12,000 11,400 8,470 10,300 41,500 6,880 8,060

Lead 7439-92-1 63 400 400 1,000 3,900 123 86.6 109 1,450 39.2 20.3 378 10.1 62 298 161 17.9 1,470 205

Magnesium 7439-95-4 --- --- --- --- --- 10,000 3,710 1,810 1,700 2,060 7,090 3,050 7,770 3,500 3,320 18,200 8,230 4,170 7,200

Manganese 7439-96-5 1600 2,000 2,000 10,000 10,000 223 180 125 134 181 376 263 346 169 109 545 489 165 230

Mercury (elemental) 7439-97-6 0.18 0.81 0.81 2.8 5.7 0.14 0.09 0.14 0.27 0.11 0.45 2.2 0.022 J 0.16 0.18 0.088 0.029 J 0.27 0.67

Nickel 7440-02-0 30 140 310 310 10,000 10.2 12.5 16 13.3 18.4 29.8 14.2 13.7 23.4 18 37.1 32.8 8.3 16.8

Potassium 7440-09-7 --- --- --- --- --- 678 688 397 560 557 2,530 697 922 1,160 564 1,000 3,020 496 936

Selenium 7782-49-2 3.9 36 180 1,500 6,800 1.7 U 1.8 U 1.9 U 2.1 U 2 U 2.4 U 2 U 1.5 U 1.5 U 1.7 U 2.2 J 2.7 U 2 U 2 U

Sodium 7440-23-5 --- --- --- --- --- 268 166 135 332 65.7 J 1,770 389 89.2 J 124 158 342 2,220 350 673

Thallium 7440-28-0 --- --- --- --- --- 2.1 U 2.3 U 2.3 U 2.6 U 2.4 U 2.9 U 2.5 U 1.9 U 1.9 U 2.1 U 2.1 U 3.3 U 2.5 U 2.5 U

Vanadium 7440-62-2 --- --- --- --- --- 14.9 16.5 11 18.3 17.9 32.1 18.3 26.1 27.4 12.3 15.9 39.5 15.5 24.2

Zinc 7440-66-6 109 2200 10000 10000 10000 140 142 265 57.4 39.8 184 110 63.5 87 141 419 94.2 58 83.4

NOTES:

NYSDEC Soil Cleanup Objective Tables can be found in Tables 375-6.8(a) and 375-6.8(b) dated 14 December 2006.

Italicized results indicate values in which the minimum detection limit (MDL) exceed the criteria.

Sample data were provided in the Phase II Investigation Report, 365 Bond Street by ELM dated October 2004.

--- : No standard indentified

J: Estimated value

U: Indicates that the result is lower than the MDL.

Restricted -

Residential

Restricted -

Commercial

Restricted -

Industrial

CAS No.

Environmental Liability Management of New York, LLC

Unrestricted

Use Residential

\\langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013-07 - OER Phase II RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Tables\Table 2 - Historical Soil Data for 365 Bond-OVERALL Historic7/10/20134:56 PM

1 of 2

Table 2SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS


365 Bond Street

Brooklyn, New York

Consultant:

Sample ID: SUBPART 375-6 (Revised Brownfields) #

Laboratory Sample Number: Protection of Public Health

Sampling Date:

Sampling Depth (ft):

VOC Sampling Depth (ft):

Units: (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)

VOCs

1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.02 2.3 3.1 30 60

1,2-Dichloroethene (cis) 156-59-2 0.25 59 100 500 1,000

Acetone 67-64-1 0.05 100 100 500 1,000

Benzene 71-43-2 0.06 2.9 4.8 44 89

Carbon Disulfide 75-15-0 --- --- --- --- ---

Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 1 30 41 390 780

Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK / 2-butanone) 78-93-3 0.12 100 100 500 1,000

Methylene chloride 75-09-2 0.05 51 100 500 1,000

Toluene 108-88-3 0.7 100 100 500 1,000Trichloroethene 79-01-6 0.47 10 21 200 400

Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4 0.02 0.21 0.9 13 27

Xylene (total) 1330-20-7 0.26 100 100 500 1,000

SVOCs

2-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 --- --- --- --- ---

Acenaphthene 83-32-9 20 100 100 500 1,000

Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 100 100 100 500 1,000

Anthracene 120-12-7 100 100 100 500 1,000

Benzo (a) anthracene 56-55-3 1 1 1 5.6 11

Benzo (a) pyrene 50-32-8 1 1 1 1 1.1

Benzo (b) fluoranthene 205-99-2 1 1 1 5.60 11

Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 191-24-2 100 100 100 500 1,000

Benzo (k) fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.8 1 3.9 56 110

bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 117-81-7 --- --- --- --- ---

Carbozole 86-74-8 --- --- --- --- ---

Chrysene 218-01-9 1 1 3.9 56 110

Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 53-70-3 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.56 1.1

Dibenzofuran 132-64-9 --- --- --- --- ---

Di-n-butyl phthalate 84-74-2 --- --- --- --- ---

Fluoranthene 206-44-0 100 100 100 500 1,000

Fluorene 86-73-7 30 100 100 500 1,000

Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 0.5 0.5 5.6 11

Isophorone 78-59-1 --- --- --- --- ---

Naphthalene 91-20-3 12 100 100 500 1,000

o-Cresol(s) (2-Methylphenol) 95-48-7 0.33 100.00 100 500 1,000

p-Cresol(s) (4-Methylphenol) 106-44-5 0.33 34 100 500 1,000

Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 0.8 2.4 6.7 6.7 55

Phenanthrene 85-01-8 100 100 100 500 1,000

Phenol 108-95-2 0.33 100 100 500 1,000

Pyrene 129-00-0 100 100 100 500 1,000

Pesticides

4,4'-DDE 72-55-9 0.0033 1.8 8.9 62 120

4,4'-DDT 50-29-3 0.0033 1.7 7.9 47 94

Aldrin 309-00-2 0.005 0.019 0.097 0.68 1.4

Alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.02 0.097 0.48 3.4 6.8

Beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.036 0.072 0.36 3 14

Chlordane (alpha) 5103-71-9 0.094 0.91 4.2 24 47

Chlordane (gamma) 5103-74-2 --- --- --- --- ---

Delta-BHC 319-86-8 0.04 100.00 100 500 1,000

Endosulfan II 33213-65-9 2.4 4.8 24 200 920

Endosulfan Sulfate 1031-07-8 2.4 4.8 24 200 920

Endrin 72-20-8 0.014 2.20 11 89 410

Endrin ketone 53494-70-5 --- --- --- --- ---

Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.042 0.42 2.1 15 29

Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 --- --- --- --- ---

Lindane 58-89-9 0.1 0.28 1.3 9.2 23

Methoxychlor 72-43-5 --- --- --- --- ---

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 1336-36-3 0.1 1 1 1 25

Aroclor 1016 12674-11-2 0.1 1 1 1 25

Aroclor 1221 11104-28-2 0.1 1 1 1 25

Aroclor 1232 11141-16-5 0.1 1 1 1 25

Aroclor 1242 53469-21-9 0.1 1 1 1 25

Aroclor 1248 12672-29-6 0.1 1 1 1 25

Aroclor 1254 11097-69-1 0.1 1 1 1 25

Aroclor 1260 11096-82-5 0.1 1 1 1 25

Aroclor 1268 11100-14-4 0.1 1 1 1 25

Metals

Aluminum 7429-90-5 --- --- --- --- ---

Arsenic 7440-38-2 13 16 16 16 16

Barium 7440-39-3 350 350 400 400 10,000

Beryllium 7440-41-7 7.2 14 72 590 2,700

Cadmium 7440-43-9 2.5 2.5 4.3 9.3 60

Calcium 7440-70-2 --- --- --- --- ---

Chromium 7440-47-3

Cobalt 7440-48-4 --- --- --- --- ---

Copper 7440-50-8 50 270 270 270 10,000

Iron 7439-89-6 --- --- --- --- ---

Lead 7439-92-1 63 400 400 1,000 3,900

Magnesium 7439-95-4 --- --- --- --- ---

Manganese 7439-96-5 1600 2,000 2,000 10,000 10,000

Mercury (elemental) 7439-97-6 0.18 0.81 0.81 2.8 5.7

Nickel 7440-02-0 30 140 310 310 10,000

Potassium 7440-09-7 --- --- --- --- ---

Selenium 7782-49-2 3.9 36 180 1,500 6,800

Sodium 7440-23-5 --- --- --- --- ---

Thallium 7440-28-0 --- --- --- --- ---

Vanadium 7440-62-2 --- --- --- --- ---

Zinc 7440-66-6 109 2200 10000 10000 10000

NOTES:

NYSDEC Soil Cleanup Objective Tables can be found in Tables 375-6.8(a) and 375-6.8(b) dated 14 December 2006.



--- : No standard indentified

J: Estimated value


Restricted -

Residential

Restricted -

Commercial

Restricted -

Industrial

CAS No. Unrestricted

Use Residential

MW-3/3-5 MW-3/5-7 MW-4/1-3 MW-4/3-5 MW-5/1-3 MW-5/5-7 LSB-11 LSB-12 LSB-13 LSB-14 LSB-15 LSB-16 LSB-16 FB-1

207707-005 207707-006 207714-001 207714-002 207714-003 207714-004 JB14454-9 JB14800-8 JB14640-5 JB14640-1,4 JB14640-2,3 JB14800-1,2 JB14800-3 JB14800-7

10/4/2004 10/4/2004 10/4/2004 10/4/2004 10/5/2004 10/5/2004 8/22/2012 8/27/2012 8/24/2012 8/24/2012 8/24/2012 8/27/2012 8/27/2012 8/27/20123-5 5-7 1-3 3-5 1-3 5-7 5-5.5 14.5-15 13.5-14 3-5 3-5 3-5 23-25 ---

5-5.5 14.5-15 13.5-14 3-3.5 4-4.5 4-4.5 24-24.5 ---

mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q mg/kg Q ug/L Q

0.078 U 0.077 U 0.00063 U 0.00059 U 0.00057 U 0.077 U < 0.0081 U < 0.00068 U < 0.00032 U < 0.0084 U < 0.0088 U < 0.070 U < 0.00015 U < 0.26 U

1.4 0.93 0.0018 J 0.00035 U 0.000340 U 0.089 U < 0.011 U < 0.00092 U < 0.00044 U 0.0842 J < 0.012 U < 0.095 U < 0.00020 U < 0.19 U

0.24 U 0.24 U 0.013 0.047 0.018 0.24 U < 0.10 U 0.0580 0.173 < 0.10 U 0.163 J < 0.87 U 0.0067 J < 3.3 U

0.067 U 0.066 U 0.001 U 0.001 U 0.001 U 0.066 U < 0.0071 U 0.0170 0.0036 < 0.0074 U < 0.0078 U < 0.061 U < 0.00013 U < 0.24 U

0.045 U 0.045 U 0.0021 J 0.0063 0.001 U 0.045 U < 0.014 U < 0.0012 U < 0.00057 U < 0.015 U < 0.016 U < 0.12 U < 0.00026 U < 0.21 U

0.060 U 0.078 J 0.014 0.0014 J 0.0033 J 0.14 J < 0.0070 U 0.0113 J 0.0119 J < 0.0073 U 0.0444 J < 0.060 U 0.0048 J < 0.19 U

0.2 U 0.2 U 0.001 U 0.001 U 0.001 U 0.2 U < 0.14 U < 0.012 U 0.0360 < 0.15 U < 0.16 U < 1.2 U < 0.0027 U < 2.4 U

0.3 JB 0.25 JB 0.01 B 0.0036 JB 0.0044 JB 0.26 JB < 0.076 U < 0.0064 U < 0.0030 U < 0.079 U < 0.083 U < 0.66 U < 0.0014 U < 0.70 U

0.045 U 0.044 U 0.0034 J 0.00064 J 0.0007 J 0.11 J < 0.0063 U 0.0048 J 0.0019 J 0.0210 J < 0.0069 U < 0.054 U < 0.00012 U < 0.23 U0.46 J 0.38 J 0.00038 U 0.00035 U 0.00034 U 0.097 U < 0.010 U < 0.00088 U < 0.00042 U < 0.011 U < 0.011 U < 0.090 U < 0.00019 U < 0.22 U

0.069 U 0.068 U 0.00038 U 0.00035 U 0.00034 U 0.068 U < 0.0086 U < 0.00072 U < 0.00034 U < 0.0089 U < 0.0094 U < 0.074 U < 0.00016 U < 0.21 U

1.5 0.33 J 0.049 0.0052 J 0.015 0.72 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

1.100 J 0.830 0.910 0.200 J 0.290 U 0.490 NA NA NA 0.481 < 0.019 U < 0.12 U < 0.023 U < 0.39 U

0.260 U 1.200 0.350 J 0.130 J 0.750 J 0.064 U NA NA NA 1.33 0.0860 1.20 < 0.012 U < 0.27 U

0.190 U 0.095 U 0.490 J 0.170 J 0.340 J 0.048 U NA NA NA < 0.011 U < 0.011 U < 0.068 U < 0.013 U < 0.23 U

1.500 J 1.000 1.100 0.490 1.900 0.580 NA NA NA 1.77 0.0477 0.593 < 0.014 U < 0.30 U

1.400 J 1.100 2.900 1.300 4.100 0.750 NA NA NA 1.68 0.107 0.602 < 0.013 U < 0.23 U

0.800 J 0.510 J 3.500 1.400 4.200 0.660 NA NA NA 1.76 0.0983 0.383 < 0.012 U < 0.23 U

0.650 J 0.440 J 4.500 1.200 5.500 0.420 NA NA NA 1.54 0.115 0.270 < 0.014 U < 0.47 U

0.410 J 0.200 J 3.600 1.400 3.600 0.780 NA NA NA 1.25 0.0623 0.330 < 0.015 U < 0.33 U

0.560 J 0.300 J 0.089 U 0.640 0.200 U 0.360 J NA NA NA 0.787 0.0433 0.130 J < 0.015 U < 0.52 U

0.210 U 0.170 J 0.110 U 0.052 U 0.240 U 0.081 J NA NA NA < 0.030 U < 0.030 U < 0.19 U < 0.036 U < 0.60 U

0.230 U 0.110 U 0.360 J 0.120 J 0.560 J 0.057 U NA NA NA 0.240 < 0.016 U < 0.098 U < 0.019 U < 0.37 U

1.500 J 1.200 3.600 1.400 4.400 0.920 NA NA NA 1.83 0.120 0.817 < 0.014 U < 0.29 U

0.180 U 0.120 J 1.200 0.480 1.300 J 0.280 J NA NA NA 0.360 0.0182 J < 0.072 U < 0.014 U < 0.39 U

0.250 U 0.120 U 0.310 J 0.110 J 0.430 J 0.062 U NA NA NA 0.918 < 0.010 U 1.04 < 0.012 U < 0.27 U

0.210 U 0.100 J 0.110 U 0.052 U 0.240 U 0.051 U NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

3.400 2.500 4.900 2.400 9.900 1.400 NA NA NA 4.47 0.194 0.932 < 0.018 U < 0.33 U

3.400 2.000 0.400 J 0.180 J 0.650 J 0.930 NA NA NA 1.75 < 0.011 U 1.39 < 0.013 U < 0.28 U

0.300 J 0.150 J 2.700 1.000 3.000 0.430 NA NA NA 0.803 0.0505 0.143 J < 0.014 U < 0.38 U

0.290 U 0.140 U 0.140 U 0.071 U 0.330 U 0.070 U NA NA NA < 0.0093 U < 0.0092 U < 0.057 U < 0.011 U < 0.28 U

0.270 U 0.130 U 0.600 J 0.160 J 0.310 U 0.067 U NA NA NA 0.291 < 0.0093 U 0.660 < 0.011 U < 0.27 U


0.850 U 0.410 U 0.430 U 0.320 J 0.980 U 0.210 U NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA


7.900 5.800 3.500 1.400 7.800 2.200 NA NA NA 4.48 0.166 2.60 < 0.019 U < 0.30 U


4.10 3.30 5.00 2.10 8.20 1.30 NA NA NA 3.38 0.172 1.68 < 0.016 U < 0.28 U

0.002 J 0.00052 U 0.00054 U 0.00051 U 0.00049 U 0.0044 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

0.00037 U 0.00037 U 0.00039 U 0.00036 U 0.00035 U 0.00037 U NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

0.00043 U 0.00045 J 0.00044 U 0.00042 U 0.00040 U 0.00042 U NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

0.00074 J 0.00051 J 0.00034 U 0.00032 U 0.00031 U 0.001 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

0.0019 J 0.002 J 0.00076 J 0.00034 J 0.00057 J 0.00032 U NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

0.00013 U 0.00013 U 0.00014 U 0.00013 U 0.0084 0.00084 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

0.00011 U 0.00011 U 0.00011 U 0.00011 U 0.0014 J 0.00011 U NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

0.0016 J 0.0008 J 0.00023 J 0.00012 U 0.00012 U 0.00045 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

0.00020 U 0.00020 U 0.01 0.0066 0.008 0.003 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

0.00021 U 0.00021 U 0.0081 0.0062 0.0086 0.0042 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA




0.0014 J 0.00067 J 0.0021 J 0.0011 J 0.0019 J 0.00091 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

0.0037 0.0018 J 0.00019 U 0.00018 U 0.00017 U 0.0029 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

0.0048 J 0.00250 U 0.032 0.02 J 0.04 0.013 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA






0.0360 0.0310 0.0015 U 0.0014 U 0.0014 U 0.0014 U NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA


0.0360 0.0310 0.0050 U 0.0047 U 0.0045 U 0.0047 U NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

3,690 1,870 4,980 13 ,700 7,940 4,550 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

7.9 J 3.8 J 8.4 J 12.4 5.4 J 5.6 J NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

64.9 23.4 102 172 97.1 993 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA


1.2 U 1.2 U 1.1 U 1.2 U 1.1 U 1 U NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

64,000 8,680 69,400 104,000 16,300 13,100 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

7.7 5.4 7.3 10.3 11.4 8.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

4.1 1.9 J 3.4 3.6 5.4 4.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA



52.3 16 156 132 199 4,380 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA < 3.0 U


111 30.4 212 688 258 121 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA


12.1 4.7 J 8.5 14.8 16.3 11.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

396 159 J 742 1,360 634 444 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

1.9 U 2 U 1.9 J 2.1 J 1.8 U 1.7 U NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

314 74.6 J 614 1,130 462 464 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA



46.3 13.2 J 60.4 102 165 540 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

Langan EngineeringEnvironmental Liability Management of New York, LLC

\\langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013-07 - OER Phase II RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Tables\Table 2 - Historical Soil Data for 365 Bond-OVERALL Historic7/10/20134:56 PM

2 of 2

TABLE 3

SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS


365 Bond Street

Brooklyn, New York

Consultant:

Sample ID: MW 1 MW 2 MW 3 MW 4 MW 5 PZ 1 LMW 3 LMW 2 LMW 1 FB 1 TB 1

Laboratory Sample Number: 207769 005 207769 004 207769 001 207769 002 207769 003 207769 006 JB 15285 4 JB 15285 5 JB 15285 8 JB 15285 6 JB 15285 7 JB 15285 9

Sampling Date: Part 703*** 10/12/2004 10/12/2004 10/12/2004 10/12/2004 10/12/2004 10/12/2004 8/31/2012 8/31/2012 8/31/2012 8/31/2012 8/31/2012 8/31/2012

Sampling Depth (ft): 12 12 12 12.5

Units: (ug/L) ug/l Q ug/l Q ug/l Q ug/l Q ug/l Q ug/l Q ug/l Q ug/l Q ug/l Q ug/l Q ug/l Q ug/l Q

VOCs

1,2 Dichloroethane 107 06 2 0.6 0.6 U 0.6 U 0.6 U 0.6 U 0.6 U 0.6 U < 0.26 U < 0.26 U < 0.26 U < 0.26 U < 0.26 U < 0.26 U

1,2 Dichloroethene (cis) 156 59 2 5 0.7 U 1.3 J 0.7 U 0.7 U 0.7 U 0.7 U < 0.19 U < 0.19 U < 0.19 U < 0.19 U < 0.19 U < 0.19 U

Acetone 67 64 1 5 8.3 J 8.7 J 2 U 11 2 U 27 15.8 6.6 J 6.6 J 4.2 J < 3.3 U < 3.3 U

Benzene 71 43 2 1 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 9.2 < 0.24 U 0.56 J 0.56 J < 0.24 U < 0.24 U < 0.24 U

Methylene chloride 75 09 2 5 0.6 UB 0.6 UB 0.6 UB 0.6 UB 0.6 UB 0.6 UB < 0.70 U < 0.70 U < 0.70 U < 0.70 U < 0.70 U < 0.70 U

Toluene 108 88 3 5 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.4 U 0.52 J < 0.23 U 0.36 J 0.38 J 0.28 J < 0.23 U < 0.23 U

SVOCs

2 Methylnaphthalene 91 57 6 5* 0.6 U 0.6 U 0.6 U 0.6 U 0.6 U 4 J < 0.42 U < 0.4 U < 0.4 U 0.75 J < 0.4 U NA

Acenaphthene 83 32 9 20 2 J 3 J 0.7 U 0.7 U 1 J 0.7 U < 0.29 U 2 U 2.5 U 3.2 U < 0.27 U NA

Dibenzofuran 132 64 9 7 x 10 7

0.8 U 0.8 U 0.8 U 0.8 U 0.8 U 0.8 U < 0.29 U 1.2 J 1.9 J 0.71 J < 0.28 U NA

Fluorene 86 73 7 5* 2 J 2 J 0.7 U 0.7 U 0.9 J 0.7 U 0.76 J 1.2 U 2.3 U 2.4 U < 0.29 U NA

Hexachlorobenzene 118 74 1 0.04 0.7 U 0.7 U 0.7 U 0.7 U 0.7 U 0.7 U < 0.37 U < 0.35 U < 0.35 U < 0.36 U < 0.35 U NA

Hexachlorobutadiene 87 68 3 0.5 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U 1 U < 0.56 U < 0.53 U < 0.53 U < 0.55 U < 0.53 U NA

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77 47 4 5 6 U 6 U 6 U 6 U 6 U 6 U < 7.7 U < 7.4 U < 7.4 U < 7.6 U < 7.4 U NA

Nitrobenzene 98 95 3 0.4 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U < 0.46 U < 0.43 U < 0.43 U < 0.45 U < 0.44 U NA

p Cresol(s) (4 Methylphenol) 106 44 5 5* 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 2 U 50 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Phenanthrene 85 01 8 5* 2 J 1 J 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.7 J 0.5 U < 0.32 U < 0.3 U < 0.3 U 1.6 U < 0.3 U NA

Phenol 108 95 2 5* 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 3 J < 1.4 U < 1.3 U < 1.3 U < 1.4 U < 1.3 U NA

Pesticides

4,4' DDT 50 29 3 0.2 0.01 U 0.0088 U 0.0088 U 0.013 J 0.01 U 0.0088 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Alpha BHC 319 84 6 0.1 0.011 0.013 U 0.013 U 0.025 J 0.011 U 0.013 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Beta BHC 319 85 7 0.04 0.088 J 0.0022 U 0.0022 U 0.025 U 0.013 J 0.0054 J NA NA NA NA NA NA

Dieldrin 60 57 1 0.001 0.0057 U 0.025 U 0.025 U 0.025 U 0.0057 U 0.025 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Endosulfan I 959 98 8 5* 0.0035 J 0.012 U 0.012 U 0.012 U 0.0035 U 0.012 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Endosulfan II 33213 65 9 5* 0.025 J 0.014 U 0.014 U 0.014 U 0.012 U 0.014 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Total Endosulfan 1031 07 8 0.0285 ND ND ND ND ND NA NA NA NA NA NA

Heptachlor epoxide 1024 57 3 0.03 0.0057 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.21 U 0.0057 U 0.21 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Lindane 58 89 9 5* 0.0052 J 0.0078 U 0.0078 U 0.0078 U 0.0052 U 0.0078 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Toxaphene 8001 35 2 0.06 0.21 U 0.016 U 0.016 U 0.016 U 0.21 U 0.016 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 1336 36 3 0.09 0.11 U 0.11 U 0.11 U 0.11 U 0.11 U 0.11 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Aroclor 1221 11104 28 2 0.09 0.11 U 0.11 U 0.11 U 0.11 U 0.11 U 0.11 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Aroclor 1254 11097 69 1 0.09 0.094 U 0.094 U 0.094 U 0.094 U 0.094 U 0.094 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Metals

Antimony 7440 36 0 3 27 U 27 U 27 U 27 U 27 U 27 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Arsenic 7440 38 2 25 22.4 J 19.5 U 19.5 U 19.5 U 19.5 U 20.2 J NA NA NA NA NA NA

Barium 7440 39 3 1,000 188 249 182 99.3 167 334 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Cadmium 7440 43 9 5 5.5 U 5.5 U 5.5 U 5.5 U 5.5 U 5.5 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Calcium 7440 70 2 183,000 156,000 108,000 143,000 109,000 127,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Cobalt 7440 48 4 5* 9 U 9 U 9 U 9 U 9 U 9 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Iron 7439 89 6 300 6100 7830 6,520 22,500 270 U 9,570 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Iron and Manganese 7493 89 6/7439 96 5 500 7072 8380 6,943 23,550 624 11,450 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Magnesium 7439 95 4 29,600 13,700 13,000 42,700 83,000 106,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Manganese 7439 96 5 300 972 550 423 1050 354 1,880 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Potassium 7440 09 7 17,900 9,300 8,350 47,000 70,300 95,600 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Selenium 7782 49 2 10 25 U 25 U 25 U 25 U 25 U 25 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Sodium 7440 23 5 20000 39,200 31,200 43,900 311000 536000 709,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Thallium 7440 28 0 5* 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U 50 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

Vanadium 7440 62 2 5* 7.5 U 7.5 U 7.5 U 7.5 U 7.5 U 7.5 U NA NA NA NA NA NA

NOTES:

* : No criteria established, value is generic criteria



J: Estimated value


Langan Engineering

DUP 1 (LMW 2)

NYSDEC Groundwater Criteria are a combination of values from Part 703 if the NYS Code and TAGM 4046. Most values are generic

screening values, however where contaminant specific criteria have been established they are used in this table.

CAS No.

Environmental Liability Management of New York, LLC

Ground Water

\\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013 07 OER Phase II RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Tables\Table 3 Historical GW Data for 365 Bond OVERALL Historic

7/10/20138:28 AM

1 of 1

Table 4Historic Vapor Analytical Results

Proposed Bond Street Development

365 Bond Street

Brooklyn, New York

Location ID

Sample ID

Lab ID

Sample Date 90th Percentile

Compound CAS No. µg/m3

µg/m3

Result (ug/m3) Q Result (ug/m

3) Q Result (ug/m

3) Q Result (ug/m

3) Q Result (ug/m

3) Q Result (ug/m

3) Q

VOCs

1,1'DICHLOROETHANE 75'34'3 ''' ''' < 0.45 U < 0.45 U < 0.45 U < 0.11 U < 26 U < 0.11 U

1,1'DICHLOROETHENE 75'35'4 ''' ''' < 0.71 U < 0.71 U < 0.71 U < 0.18 U < 44 U < 0.18 U

BENZENE 71'43'2 13 9.4 13 13 35.5 0.3 J < 35 U 16

ETHYLBENZENE 100'41'4 6.4 5.7 1.8 J 1.9 J 13 < 0.13 U 152 J 33

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) 127'18'4 2.5 to 100 * 15.9 to 100 * 5.2 5.1 25 1.4 < 44 U 0.88

TOLUENE 108'88'3 57 43 17 16 25 4.9 167 J 143

TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) 79'01'6 0.5 to 5 * 4.2 1.6 0.81 J 2.1 < 0.18 U < 40 U < 0.18 U

O'XYLENE (1,2'DIMETHYLBENZENE) 95'47'6 7.1 7.9 2.7 J 2.7 J 12 < 0.13 U < 31 U 43

M AND P XYLENES 179601'23'1 11 22.2 6.1 6.1 44.3 0.78 J 162 J 120

NOTES:

1: NYSDOH 2003: Study of Volatile Organic Chemicals in Air of Fuel Oil Heated Homes (Upper Fence criteria)

2: USEPA 2001: Building Assessment and Survey Evaluation (BASE) Database using Summa Cannister Method

* Upper range based on NYSDOH Air Guideline Values as published in the NYSDOH Soil Vapor Intrusion Guidance dated October 2006

''': Not included in study


J: Estimated Value

AMBIENT'2

039

JB15244'8

LSV'6

035

JB15244'4

8/30/2012

DUP'1 (LSV'6)

036

JB15244'5

8/30/2012 8/30/2012

AMBIENT'1

032

JB15244'1

8/30/20128/30/2012

LSV'7

037

JB15244'6

8/30/2012

NYSDOH 1

USEPA 2001 2

LSV'8

038

JB15244'7

Table 5

PROPOSED SAMPLING SUMMARY


365 BOND STREET

Brooklyn, New York

Matrix Sample Depth (ft bgs) Sample Location Analysis

0' bgs - 10' bgs LSB-11

LSB-12

LSB-13

LSB-14

LSB-15

LSB-16

LSV-6

Soil Vapor LSV-7 VOCs

LSV-8

LMW-1

Groundwater --- LMW-2

LMW-3

Matrix Sample Depth (ft bgs) Sample Location Analysis

LSB-13

LSB-17

LSB-18

LSB-19

LSB-26

LSB-28

LSB-20

LSV-9

Soil Vapor LSV-23

LSV-25 VOCs

LSV-10

LSV-24

PZ-1

LMW-1

LMW-2

--- LMW-3

Groundwater LMW-4

LMW-5

LMW-8

MW-1

NOTES:

*Subslab and 5' bgs samples will be co-located at each LSV location.

AOC-4: Proposed Excavation Area - 365 Bond Street

AOC-6: Former Drycleaner - 365 Bond Street

Soil0' bgs- 2' bgs

Groundwater Interface

5' bgs

VOCs

SVOCs

Pesticides

PCBs

Metals

VOCs

SVOCs

Pesticides

PCBs

Total Metals

Filtered Metals

VOCs

SVOCs

Final Proposed Sampling Summary

365 Bond Street

Due Diligence Proposed Sampling Summary

Soil

VOCs10' bgs - 15' bgs

2' bgs - 5' bgs

20' bgs - 30' bgs

VOCs

SVOCs

Subslab

Subslab

\\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013-07 - OER Phase II RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Tables\Table 5 - Proposed Sample Summary (Revised 12-7-12)-Proposed Samples

Page 1 of 1

7/10/2013 8:39 AM


FIGURES

Project Drawing Title

KINGS COUNTY NEW YORK

mêçéçëÉÇ=_çåÇ=píêÉÉí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí

BLOCK No. 458, LOT No. 1

BROOKLYN

pfqb=il`^qflkj^m

Path: \\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\ArcGIS\ArcMap_Documents\2012-11 - NYSDEC Phase II RIWP\365 Bond Street (Revised 2013-06-04)\Figure 1 - Site Location Plan.mxd

© 2

01

3 L

an

ga

n

Project No.

Date

Scale

Drawn By

Last Revised

Figure

100287501

10/19/2012

amf

6/14/2013

SITE

Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed

.

1"=2000'

1

2,000 0 2,000

SCALE IN FEET

619 River Drive Center 1Elmwood Park, NJ 07407-1338

T: 201.794.6900 F: 201.794.0366www.langan.com

NEW JERSEY NEW YORK VIRGINIA CALIFORNIA PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT FLORIDA

ABU DHABI ATHENS DOHA

DUBAI ISTANBUL

NJ CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION No. 24GA27996400

Path: \\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\ArcGIS\ArcMap_Documents\2012-11 - NYSDEC Phase II RIWP\365 Bond Street (Revised 2013-06-04)\Figure 2 - Site Plan.mxd

© 2

01

2 L

ang

an

A

!.

A

!.

!.

A

A

!.

A

!.

A

A

A

AA

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

BO

ND

ST

RE

ET

1ST STREET

(PAVED PARKING LOT)

(FORMER 2-STORY BUILDING)

(FORMER BUILDING)

5 CONJOINED BUILDINGS

LOADING BAY METAL FLOOR

ELEVATOR

AOC-3

AOC-4

AOC-6

(PAVED PARKING LOT)

RACKS

LSV-7

LSV-6

LSB-16/LMW-5

LSB-15/LMW-4

LSB-14/LMW-3

LSB-13/LMW-2

LSB-12/LMW-1

LSB-11

LSV-8

PZ-1

B-5

B-2

B-3

B-1

B-4

MW-5

MW-4

MW-3

MW-1

MW-2

.

40 0 40

SCALE IN FEET



pfqb=mi^k

Project No.

Date

Scale

Drawn By

Last Revised

Figure

100287501

11/6/2012

amf

6/14/2013

1"=40'

River Drive Center 1, 619 River DriveElmwood Park, NJ 07407-1338

T: 201.794.6900 F: 201.794.0366 www.langan.com

mêçéçëÉÇ=_çåÇpíêÉÉí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí

BLOCK No. 458, LOT No. 1

BROOKLYN

2Langan Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc.

Langan Engineering, Environmental, Surveying andLandscape Architecture, D.P.C.

Langan International LLC

Collectively known as Langan


Legend

Sample Locations

Street Extents

Soil Vapor Location (Langan,2012)

Soil Boring/Monitoring Well Location (Langan, 2012)

Soil Boring Location (Langan, 2012)

!. Soil Boring Location (ELM, 2004 - 2005)

Proposed Excavation Area (Langan)

Areas of Concern (AOCs)

A

A

A

Site Boundary

Former Building

Existing Building

Gowanus Canal

Notes:1. Map features are based on aerial photographs, tax maps, and the following ELM reports: Phase II Investigation Report, 365 Bond Street (October 2004).2. AOC-4: Proposed Excavation Area - 365 Bond Street; AOC-6: Former Dry Cleaners

A

!.

A

!.

!.

A

A

!.

A

!.

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

GO

WA

NU

S C

AN

AL

BO

ND

ST

RE

ET

1ST STREET

(PAVED PARKING LOT)


(FORMER BUILDING)

(VACANT PAVED LOT)


PZ-1

B-5

B-2

B-3

B-1

B-4

MW-5

MW-4

MW-3

MW-1

MW-2

LSV-8

LSB-16/LMW-5

LSB-15/LMW-4

LSB-14/LMW-3

LSB-13/LMW-2

LSB-12/LMW-1

LSB-11

AOC-4

AOC-6

Path: \\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\ArcGIS\ArcMap_Documents\2012-11 - NYSDEC Phase II RIWP\365 Bond Street (Revised 2013-07)\Figure 3 - 365 Bond Data Soil.mxd

.

30 0 30

SCALE IN FEET

Project No.

Date

Scale

Drawn By

Last Revised

100287501

7/2/2012

amf

7/9/2013

1"=30'

River Drive Center 1, 619 River Drive, Elmwood Park, NJ 07407-1338T: 201.794.6900 F: 201.794.0366 www.langan.com

NEW JERSEY NEW YORK VIRGINIA CALIFORNIA

PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT FLORIDA

Project


molmlpba=_lka

pqobbq=absbilmjbkqBLOCK No. 458, LOT No. 1

BROOKLYN

Drawing Title

PSR=_lka=pqobbq

prjjôv=lc=efpqlof`

plfi=̂ kîvqf`î=obpriqp

Figure

3

© 2

01

3 L

an

ga

n


DUBAI ISTANBUL

Langan Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc.

Langan Engineering, Environmental, Surveying and Landscape Architecture, D.P.C.




Sample ID: B�1/3�5

Laboratory Sample Number:

207714�

008

Sampling Date: 10/1/2004

Sampling Depth (ft): 3�5

Units: mg/kg Q

Volatile Organic Compounds

1,2�Dichloroethane 0.077 U

Acetone 0.24 U

Benzene 0.066 U

Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK / 2�

butanone) 0.2 U

Methylene chloride 0.31 JB

Vinyl Chloride 0.068 U

Semi�Volatile Organic Compounds

Benzo (a) anthracene 4.4

Benzo (a) pyrene 4.3

Benzo (b) fluoranthene 3.3

Benzo (k) fluoranthene 2.9 J

Chrysene 4.9

Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 1 J

Indeno (1,2,3�cd) pyrene 1.8 J

o�Cresol(s) (2�Methylphenol) 0.81 U

p�Cresol(s) (4�Methylphenol) 1.6 U

Pentachlorophenol 2.6 U

Phenol 0.88 U

Metals

Lead 123

Zinc 140



207707�

008



Units: mg/kg Q



Acetone 0.24 U

Benzene 0.065 U


butanone) 0.2 U







Phenol 0.45 U

Pesticides

4,4'�DDT 0.0047

Metals

Lead 86.6

Zinc 142



207714�

005


Sampling Depth (ft): 3 � 5

Units: mg/kg Q



Acetone 0.24 U

Benzene 0.064 U


butanone) 0.19 U

Methylene chloride 0.27 J


Metals

Lead 109

Zinc 265



207714�

006


Sampling Depth (ft): 5� 7

Units: mg/kg Q



Acetone 0.31 U

Benzene 0.084 U


butanone) 0.25 U




p�Cresol(s) (4�Methylphenol) 2

Metals

Lead 1,450

Mercury (elemental) 0.27



207714�

007



Units: mg/kg Q



Acetone 0.24 U

Benzene 0.065 U


butanone) 0.19 U





207714�

008



Units: mg/kg Q



Acetone 0.34 U

Benzene 0.092 U


butanone) 0.27 U



Metals


Zinc 184


Laboratory Sample Number: 207714�009



Units: mg/kg Q



Acetone 0.26 U

Benzene 0.07 U


butanone) 0.21 U







Phenol 0.5 U

Pesticides

4,4'�DDE 0.0034 J

Metals

Lead 378


Zinc 110





Units: mg/kg Q




Chrysene 3

Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 0.8

Indeno (1,2,3�cd) pyrene 0.55 J


Sample ID: B�5/0.5�2.5



Sampling Depth (ft): 0.5�2.5

Units: mg/kg Q


Acetone 0.052





Phenol 0.43 U

Sample ID: B�5/4.5�6.5


207714�

012


Sampling Depth (ft): 4.5�6.5

Units: mg/kg Q



Acetone 0.23 U

Benzene 0.67


butanone) 0.19 U


Toluene 1.1


Xylene (total) 4.9


Benzo (a) anthracene 11


Benzo (b) fluoranthene 12

Benzo (k) fluoranthene 0.83 U

Chrysene 12

Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 2.7 J

Metals


SUBPART 375-6 (Revised Brownfields)

Unrestricted

Use Objectives

Protection of Public Health

Residential Restricted

Residential

Restricted

Commercial

Restricted

Industrial

(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)

VOCs

1,1�Dichloroethane 0.27 19 26 240 480

1,1�Dichloroethene 0.33 100 100 500 1,000

1,2�Dichloroethane 0.02 2.3 3.1 30 60

1,2�Dichloroethene (cis) 0.25 59 100 500 1,000

1,2�Dichloroethene (trans) 0.19 100 100 500 1,000

Acetone 0.05 100 100 500 1,000

Benzene 0.06 2.9 4.8 44 89

Carbon tetrachloride 0.76 1.4 2.4 22 44

Chloroform 0.37 10 49 350 700

Ethylbenzene 1 30 41 390 780

Methyl ethyl ketone 0.12 100 100 500 1,000

Methylene chloride 0.05 51 100 500 1,000

Toluene 0.7 100 100 500 1,000

Trichloroethene 0.47 10 21 200 400

Vinyl Chloride 0.02 0.21 0.9 13 27

Xylene (total) 0.26 100 100 500 1,000

SVOCs

1,2�Dichlorobenzene 1.1 100 100 500 1,000

Acenaphthene 20 100 100 500 1,000

Anthracene 100 100 100 500 1,000

Benzo (a) anthracene 1 1 1 5.6 11

Benzo (a) pyrene 1 1 1 1 1.1

Benzo (b) fluoranthene 1 1 1 5.60 11

Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 100 100 100 500 1,000

Benzo (k) fluoranthene 0.8 1 3.9 56 110

Chrysene 1 1 3.9 56 110

Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.56 1.1

Fluoranthene 100 100 100 500 1,000

Fluorene 30 100 100 500 1,000

Indeno (1,2,3�cd) pyrene 0.5 0.5 0.5 5.6 11

Naphthalene 12 100 100 500 1,000

o�Cresol(s) (2�Methylphenol) 0.33 100 100 500 1,000

p�Cresol(s) (4�Methylphenol) 0.33 34 100 500 1,000

Pentachlorophenol 0.8 2.4 6.7 6.7 55

Phenanthrene 100 100 100 500 1,000

Phenol 0.33 100 100 500 1,000

Pyrene 100 100 100 500 1,000

PCBs/Pesticides

4,4'�DDE 0.0033 1.8 8.9 62 120

4,4'�DDT 0.0033 1.7 7.9 47 94

4,4'�DDD 0.0033 2.6 13 92 180

Aroclor 1254 0.1 1 1 1 25

Aldrin 0.005 0.019 0.097 0.68 1.4

Dieldrin 0.005 0.039 0.2 1.4 2.8

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.1 1 1 1 25

Metals

Arsenic 13 16 16 16 16

Barium 350 350 400 400 10,000

Cadmium 2.5 2.5 4.3 9.3 60

Copper 50 270 270 270 10,000

Lead 63 400 400 1,000 3,900

Mercury (elemental) 0.18 0.81 0.81 2.8 5.7

Nickel 30 140 310 310 10,000

Selenium 3.9 36 180 1,500 6,800

Zinc 109 2200 10000 10000 10000

Location ID

Sample Date

Sample Depth

VOC Sample Depth

Depth Unit


1,4-DIOXANE (P-DIOXANE) < 3.9 U

ACETONE 0.163 J

METHYL ETHYL KETONE (2-BUTANONE) < 0.16 U

METHYLENE CHLORIDE < 0.083 U

LSB-15

8/24/2012

3-5

4-4.5

ft

Location ID

Sample Date

Sample Depth

VOC Sample Depth

Depth Unit


1,4-DIOXANE (P-DIOXANE) < 31 U

ACETONE < 0.87 U

BENZENE < 0.061 U



TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) < 0.090 U

VINYL CHLORIDE < 0.074 U

LSB-16

8/27/2012

3-5

4-4.5

ft

Location ID

Sample Date

Sample Depth

VOC Sample Depth

Depth Unit



ACETONE 0.173

14

ft

LSB-13

8/24/2012

13.5

Location ID

Sample Date

Sample Depth

VOC Sample Depth

Depth Unit



ACETONE 0.0580

ft

LSB-12

8/27/2012

14.5

15

Location ID

Sample Date

Sample Depth

VOC Sample Depth

Depth Unit



ACETONE < 0.10 U



ft

LSB-11

8/22/2012

5-5.5

5-5.5

Sample ID: MW�4/1�3




Units: mg/kg Q





Chrysene 3.6


Indeno (1,2,3�cd) pyrene 2.7


Metals

Copper 57.1

Lead 156






Units: mg/kg Q





Chrysene 1.4


Indeno (1,2,3�cd) pyrene 1

Metals

Lead 132






Units: mg/kg Q



1,2�Dichloroethene (cis) 1.4

Acetone 0.24 U

Benzene 0.067 U


butanone) 0.2 U



Xylene (total) 1.5


Benzo (a) anthracene 1.4 J

Chrysene 1.5 J




Phenol 0.46 U

Metals






Units: mg/kg Q



1,2�Dichloroethene (cis) 0.93

Acetone 0.24 U

Benzene 0.066 U


butanone) 0.2 U



Xylene (total) 0.33 J



Chrysene 1.2


Metals






Units: mg/kg Q



Acetone 0.25 U

Benzene 0.068 U


butanone) 0.2 U





Metals

Lead 1,470






Units: mg/kg Q



Acetone 0.26 U

Benzene 0.069 U


butanone) 0.21 U



Metals

Lead 205






Units: mg/kg Q





Chrysene 4.4

Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 1.3 J

Indeno (1,2,3�cd) pyrene 3




Phenol 0.53 U

Metals

Lead 199

Zinc 165





Units: mg/kg Q



Acetone 0.24 U

Benzene 0.066 U


butanone) 0.2 U



Xylene (total) 0.72

Pesticides

4,4'�DDE 0.0044

Metals

Barium 993

Lead 4,380


Zinc 540

Legend

Site BoundaryFormer BuildingExisting Building

Gowanus Canal

Sample Locations

A Monitoring Well/Piezometer Location (ELM, 2004 - 2005)

Street Extents

!. Soil Boring Location (ELM, 2004 - 2005)


Soil Boring Location (Langan, 2012) A

Notes:1. Map features are based on aerial photographs, tax maps, and the following ELM reports: Phase II Investigation Report, 365 Bond Street (October 2004).2. All ELM sample locations are approximate and based on the following ELM reports: Phase II Investigation Report, 365 Bond Street (October 2004).3. Italicized values indicate method detection limit exceeds criteria.4. AOC-4: Proposed Excavation Area - 365 Bond Street; AOC-6: Former Dry Cleaners.

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

GO

WA

NU

S C

AN

AL

BO

ND

ST

RE

ET

1ST STREET

(PAVED PARKING LOT)


(FORMER BUILDING)

(VACANT PAVED LOT)


PZ-1

MW-5

MW-4

MW-3

MW-1

MW-2

LSB-16/LMW-5

LSB-15/LMW-4

LSB-14/LMW-3

LSB-13/LMW-2

LSB-12/LMW-1

AOC-4

AOC-6

Path: \\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\ArcGIS\ArcMap_Documents\2012-11 - NYSDEC Phase II RIWP\365 Bond Street (Revised 2013-07)\Figure 4 - 365 Bond Data Groundwater.mxd

.

30 0 30

SCALE IN FEET

Project No.

Date

Scale

Drawn By

Last Revised

100287501

7/2/2012

amf

7/9/2013

1"=30'

River Drive Center 1, 619 River Drive, Elmwood Park, NJ 07407-1338T: 201.794.6900 F: 201.794.0366 www.langan.com

NEW JERSEY NEW YORK VIRGINIA CALIFORNIA

PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT FLORIDA

Project


molmlpba=_lka


BROOKLYN

Drawing Title

PSR=_lka=pqobbq

prjjôv=lc=

efpqlof`=dolrkat^qbo

^kîvqf`î=obpriqp

Figure

4

© 2

01

3 L

an

ga

n


DUBAI ISTANBUL






Sample ID: PZ 1

Laboratory Sample Number: 207769 006


Units: ug/l Q


1,2 Dichloroethane 0.6 U

Acetone 27

Benzene 9.2


Dibenzofuran 0.8 U

Hexachlorobenzene 0.7 U

Hexachlorobutadiene 1 U

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 6 U

Nitrobenzene 0.5 U

p Cresol(s) (4 Methylphenol) 50

PCBs/Pesticides

Aroclor 1221 0.11 U

Aroclor 1254 0.094 U

Dieldrin 0.025 U

Heptachlor epoxide 0.21 U

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.11 U

Metals

Antimony 27 U

Cadmium 5.5 U

Cobalt 9 U

Iron 9,570

Iron and Manganese 11,450

Manganese 1,880

Selenium 25 U

Sodium 709,000

Thallium 50 U

Vanadium 7.5 U

NYSDEC Part 703 Groundwater Quality Objectives

Ground Water

Quality Standards

(ug/L)

VOCs

1,1,2 Trichloroethane 1

1,2 Dichloroethane 0.6

1,2 Dichloroethene (cis) 5*

Acetone 5*

Benzene 1

Bromomethane 5*

Ethylbenzene 5*

Methyl ethyl ketone 5*

Methylene chloride 5*

Toluene 5*

Vinyl Chloride 2

Xylene (mixed) 5*

SVOCs

1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene 5

2 Chlorophenol 5*

2 Methylnaphthalene 5*

2 Nitroaniline 5*

2 Nitrophenol 5*

2,4 Dichlorophenol 5*

2,4 Dimethylphenol 5*

2,4 Dinitrophenol 5*

2,4 Dinitrotoluene 5

2,4,5 Trichlorophenol 5*

2,6 Dinitrotoluene 5

3 Nitroaniline 5*

3,3' Dichlorobenzidine 5

4 Chloroaniline 5

4 Chloro 3 methylphenol 5*

4 Nitroaniline 5*

4 Nitrophenol 5*

Acenaphthene 20

Acenaphthylene 5*

Anthracene 5*

Benzo(a)anthracene 5*

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5*

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 5*

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 5*

bis(2 Chloroethyl)ether 5

bis(2 Ethylhexyl)phthalate 5*

Butyl benzyl phthalate 5*

Chrysene 5*

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 5*

Dibenzofuran 7 x 10 7

Diethyl phthalate 5*

Dimethyl phthalate 5*

Di n octyl phthalate 5*

Fluoranthene 5*

Fluorene 5*

Hexachlorobenzene 0.04

Hexachlorobutadiene 0.5

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 5

Hexachloroethane 5

Indeno(1,2,3 cd)pyrene 5*

Isophorone 5*

Naphthalene 5*

Nitrobenzene 0.4

o Cresol(s) (2 Methylphenol) 5*

p Cresol(s) (4 Methylphenol) 5*

Pentachlorophenol 5*

Phenanthrene 5*

Phenol 5*

Pyrene 5*

PCBs/Pesticides

4,4' DDE 0.2

Aroclor 1221 0.09

Aroclor 1232 0.09

Aroclor 1254 0.09

Aroclor 1260 0.09

Beta BHC 0.04

Dieldrin 0.001

Heptachlor epoxide 0.03

Toxaphene 0.06

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 0.09

Metals

Antimony 3

Arsenic 25

Cadmium 5*

Cobalt 5*

Iron 300

Iron and Manganese 500

Lead 25

Manganese 300

Selenium 10

Sodium 20,000

Thallium 5*

Vanadium 5*

Zinc 66

* : No criteria established, value is generic criteria

Sample ID:


Sampling Date:

Units: ug/l Q

VOCs

1,2 Dibromo 3 chloropropane < 0.54 U

1,4 Dioxane < 75 U

SVOCs

2,4 Dinitrophenol < 18 U

4 Nitrophenol < 5.6 U

Dibenzofuran 0.71 J

Hexachlorobenzene < 0.36 U

Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.55 U

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene < 7.6 U

Nitrobenzene < 0.45 U

LMW 1

JB 15285 6

8/31/2012

Sample ID:


Sampling Date:

Units: ug/l Q ug/l Q

VOCs

Acetone 6.6 J 6.6 J

1,2 Dibromo 3 chloropropane < 0.54 U < 0.54 U

1,4 Dioxane < 75 U < 75 U

Isopropyl Benzene 13.8 14.1

SVOCs

2,4 Dinitrophenol < 17 U < 17 U

4 Nitrophenol < 5.4 U < 5.4 U

Dibenzofuran 1.2 J 1.9 J

Hexachlorobenzene < 0.35 U < 0.35 U

Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.53 U < 0.53 U

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene < 7.4 U < 7.4 U

Nitrobenzene < 0.43 U < 0.43 U

8/31/2012

JB 15285 8

DUP 1 (LMW 2)LMW 2

JB 15285 5

8/31/2012

Sample ID: MW 2



Units: ug/l Q



Acetone 8.7 J


Dibenzofuran 0.8 U




Nitrobenzene 0.5 U

PCBs/Pesticides

Aroclor 1221 0.11 U


Dieldrin 0.025 U



Metals

Antimony 27 U

Cadmium 5.5 U

Cobalt 9 U

Iron 7830


Manganese 550

Selenium 25 U

Sodium 31,200

Thallium 50 U

Vanadium 7.5 U

Sample ID: MW 3



Units: ug/l Q




Dibenzofuran 0.8 U




Nitrobenzene 0.5 U

PCBs/Pesticides

Aroclor 1221 0.11 U


Dieldrin 0.025 U



Metals

Antimony 27 U

Cadmium 5.5 U

Cobalt 9 U

Iron 6,520


Manganese 423

Selenium 25 U

Sodium 43,900

Thallium 50 U

Vanadium 7.5 U

Sample ID: MW 5



Units: ug/l Q




Dibenzofuran 0.8 U




Nitrobenzene 0.5 U

PCBs/Pesticides

Aroclor 1221 0.11 U


Dieldrin 0.0057 U

Toxaphene 0.21 U


Metals

Antimony 27 U

Cadmium 5.5 U

Cobalt 9 U


Manganese 354

Selenium 25 U

Sodium 536000

Thallium 50 U

Vanadium 7.5 U

Sample ID:


Sampling Date:

Units: ug/l Q

VOCs

Acetone 15.8

1,2 Dibromo 3 chloropropane < 0.54 U

1,4 Dioxane < 75 U

SVOCs

2,4 Dinitrophenol < 18 U

4 Nitrophenol < 5.7 U

Dibenzofuran < 0.29 U

Hexachlorobenzene < 0.37 U

Hexachlorobutadiene < 0.56 U

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene < 7.7 U

Nitrobenzene < 0.28 U

8/31/2012

JB 15285 4

LMW 3

Sample ID: MW 1



Units: ug/l Q



Acetone 8.3 J


Dibenzofuran 0.8 U




Nitrobenzene 0.5 U

PCBs/Pesticides

Beta BHC 0.088 J

Aroclor 1221 0.11 U



Toxaphene 0.21 U


Metals

Antimony 27 U

Cadmium 5.5 U

Cobalt 9 U

Iron 6100


Manganese 972

Selenium 25 U

Sodium 39,200

Thallium 50 U

Vanadium 7.5 U

Sample ID: MW 4



Units: ug/l Q


Acetone 11

Dibenzofuran 0.8 U




Nitrobenzene 0.5 U

Aroclor 1221 0.11 U


Dieldrin 0.025 U



Antimony 27 U

Cadmium 5.5 U

Cobalt 9 U

Iron 22,500


Manganese 1050

Selenium 25 U

Sodium 311000

Thallium 50 U

Vanadium 7.5 U


PCBs/Pesticides


Metals

Legend

Site BoundaryFormer BuildingExisting Building

Gowanus CanalStreet ExtentsAreas of Concern (AOCs)

Soil Boring/Monitoring Well Location (Langan, 2012) A

A Monitoring Well/Piezometer Location (ELM, 2004 - 2005)

Notes:1. Map features are based on aerial photographs, tax maps, and the following ELM reports: Phase II Investigation Report, 365 Bond Street (October 2004).2. All ELM sample locations are approximate and based on the following ELM reports: Phase II Investigation Report, 365 Bond Street (October 2004).3. Italicized values indicate method detection limit exceeds criteria.4. AOC-4: Proposed Excavation Area - 365 Bond Street; AOC-6: Former Dry Cleaners.

Path: \\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\ArcGIS\ArcMap_Documents\2012-11 - NYSDEC Phase II RIWP\365 Bond Street (Revised 2013-07)\Figure 5 - 365 Bond Data Soil Vapor.mxd

© 2

01

2 L

ang

an

A

AA

BO

ND

ST

RE

ET

1ST STREET

(PAVED PARKING LOT)


(FORMER BUILDING)

(VACANT PAVED LOT)


LSV-8

LSV-7

LSV-6

AOC-4

AOC-6

.

50 0 50

SCALE IN FEET



PSR=_lka=pqobbq

prjjôv=lc=efpqlof`

plfi=s^mlo=

^kîvqf`î=obpriqp

Project No.

Date

Scale

Drawn By

Last Revised

Figure

100287501

10/28/2012

amf

7/9/2013

1"=50'


T: 201.794.6900 F: 201.794.0366 www.langan.com

molmlpba=_lka


BROOKLYN






Location ID

Lab Sample Number

Sample Date

Unit


CIS�1,2�DICHLOROETHYLENE < 34 U

1,2,4�TRIMETHYLBENZENE < 27 U

1,3�DICHLOROBENZENE < 52 U

1,3,5�TRIMETHYLBENZENE (MESITYLENE) < 31 U

BENZENE < 35 U

CARBON DISULFIDE < 23 U

CHLOROMETHANE < 18 U

CHLOROFORM < 31 U

CYCLOHEXANE 2420

DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE < 43 U

ETHYL ACETATE < 50 U

ETHYLBENZENE 152 J

METHYL ETHYL KETONE (2�BUTANONE) < 32 U

METHYLENE CHLORIDE < 22 U

STYRENE < 27 U

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) < 44 U

TOLUENE 167 J

TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) < 40 U

TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE < 55 U

O�XYLENE (1,2�DIMETHYLBENZENE) < 31 U

M AND P XYLENES 162 J

CARBON TETRACHLORIDE < 57 U

4�ETHYLTOLUENE < 27 U

N�HEPTANE 343

N�HEXANE 733

LSV�8

JB15244�7

8/30/2012

ug/m3

Location ID

Lab Sample Number

Sample Date

Unit


CIS�1,2�DICHLOROETHYLENE < 0.59 U < 0.59 U

1,3�DICHLOROBENZENE < 0.9 U < 0.9 U

BENZENE 13 13

CARBON DISULFIDE 5.6 5.6

CHLOROFORM 3.1 J 3 J

ETHYL ACETATE 47.9 7.2

METHYL ETHYL KETONE (2�BUTANONE) 14 12

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) 5.2 5.1

TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) 1.6 0.81 J

ug/m3

DUP�1 (LSV�6)

JB15244�5

8/30/2012

ug/m3

LSV�6

JB15244�4

8/30/2012

90th Percentile

µg/m3

µg/m3


CIS�1,2�DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.4 <1.9

1,2,4�TRIMETHYLBENZENE 9.8 9.5

1,3�DICHLOROBENZENE 0.5 <2.4

1,3,5�TRIMETHYLBENZENE (MESITYLENE) 3.9 3.7

ACETONE 115 98.9

BENZENE 13 9.4

CARBON DISULFIDE �� 4.2

CHLOROMETHANE 4.2 3.7

CHLOROFORM 2.81 4.1

CYCLOHEXANE 6.3 ��

DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 10 16.5

ETHYL ACETATE �� 5.4

ETHYLBENZENE 6.4 5.7

METHYL ETHYL KETONE (2�BUTANONE) 16 12

METHYLENE CHLORIDE 16 to 60 * 10

STYRENE 1.4 1.9

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) 2.5 to 100 * 15.9 to 100 *

TOLUENE 57 43

TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) 0.5 to 5 * 4.2

TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 12 18.1

O�XYLENE (1,2�DIMETHYLBENZENE) 7.1 7.9

M AND P XYLENES 11 22.2

CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1.3 to 5 * 1.3

4�ETHYLTOLUENE �� 3.6

N�HEPTANE 18 ��

N�HEXANE 14 10.2

USEPA 2001 2

NYSDOH 1

Location ID

Lab Sample Number

Sample Date

Unit


CIS�1,2�DICHLOROETHYLENE < 0.59 U

1,3�DICHLOROBENZENE < 0.9 U

1,3,5�TRIMETHYLBENZENE (MESITYLENE) 4.6

ACETONE 397

BENZENE 35.5

CARBON DISULFIDE 5.9

CYCLOHEXANE 68.5

ETHYLBENZENE 13

METHYL ETHYL KETONE (2�BUTANONE) 92

TETRACHLOROETHYLENE(PCE) 25

TRICHLOROETHYLENE (TCE) 2.1

M AND P XYLENES 44.3

4�ETHYLTOLUENE 12

N�HEPTANE 65.6

N�HEXANE 115

LSV�7

JB15244�6

8/30/2012

ug/m3

Legend

Site Boundary

Former Building

Existing Building

Gowanus Canal

Soil Vapor Point Location (Langan, 2012) A


Street Extents

Path: \\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\ArcGIS\ArcMap_Documents\2012-11 (Rev. 2013-07) - NYSDEC Phase II RIWP\365 Bond Street (Revised 2013-07)\Figure 6 - Summary of NAPL Observations.mxd

© 2

01

2 L

ang

an

!

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R!

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

!R

BO

ND

ST

RE

ET

1ST STREET

(PAVED PARKING LOT)


(FORMER BUILDING)


AOC-4

AOC-6

(PAVED PARKING LOT)

LSV-7

LSV-6

LSB-16/LMW-5

LSB-15/LMW-4

LSB-14/LMW-3

LSB-13/LMW-2

LSB-12/LMW-1

LSB-11

LSV-8

PZ-1

B-5

B-2

B-3

B-1

B-4

MW-5

MW-4

MW-3

MW-1

MW-2

.

40 0 40

SCALE IN FEET



prjj^ov=lc

k^mi=l_pbos^qflkp

Project No.

Date

Scale

Drawn By

Last Revised

Figure

100287501

11/6/2012

amf

7/10/2013

1"=40'


T: 201.794.6900 F: 201.794.0366 www.langan.com

molmlpba=_lka


BROOKLYN






Legend

Sheen Observed

DNAPL Observed

LNAPL Observed

Historic Sample Location!R


Proposed Excavation Area (Langan)

Street Extents

Gowanus Canal

Existing Building

Former Building

Site Boundary

Notes:1. Map features are based on aerial photographs, tax maps, and the following ELM reports: Phase II Investigation Report, 365 Bond Street (October 2004).2. AOC-4: Proposed Excavation Area - 365 Bond Street; AOC-6: Former Dry Cleaners.

Path: \\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\ArcGIS\ArcMap_Documents\2012-11 (Rev. 2013-07) - NYSDEC Phase II RIWP\365 Bond Street (Revised 2013-07)\Figure 7 - Proposed Phase II Sample Location Plan.mxd

© 2

01

2 L

ang

an

A

AA

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

GO

WA

NU

S C

AN

AL

BO

ND

ST

RE

ET

1ST STREET

(PAVED PARKING LOT)


(FORMER BUILDING)

5 CONJOINED BUILDINGSAOC-4

AOC-6

(PAVED PARKING LOT)

LSV-8

LSV-7

LSV-6

LSB-16/LMW-5

LSB-15/LMW-4

LSB-14/LMW-3

LSB-13/LMW-2

LSB-12/LMW-1

LSB-11

LSV-10

LSV-9

LSB-20

LSB-19

LSB-18

LSB-17

LSB-26/LMW-8

LSB-13

LSV-6

LSB-12 LSB-26/LMW-8

LSV-24

LSV-25

.

40 0 40

SCALE IN FEET



molmlpba

p^jmib=il`^qflk

mi^k

Project No.

Date

Scale

Drawn By

Last Revised

Figure

100287501

11/6/2012

amf

7/10/2013

1"=40'


T: 201.794.6900 F: 201.794.0366 www.langan.com

molmlpba=_lka


BROOKLYN






Notes:1. Map features are based on aerial photographs, tax maps, and the following ELM reports: Phase II Investigation Report, 365 Bond Street (October 2004).2. AOC-4: Proposed Excavation Area - 365 Bond Street; AOC-6: Former Dry Cleaners.

Legend

Site Boundary

Existing Building

Former Building

Gowanus Canal

Streets

Area of Concern

Proposed Excavation Extents (Langan)

Historic Monitoring Well/Piezometer LocationA

Historic Soil Boring/Geoprobe Location!

Due Diligence Soil Vapor Point Location A

Due Diligence Soil Boring Location A

Due Diligence Soil Boring/Monitoring Well Location A

Proposed Soil Vapor Point Location A

Proposed Soil Boring Location A

Proposed Soil Boring/Monitoring Well Location A


APPENDIX A

ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS

,J

-

EL. 9' -8"

-N N

EL. 8'-6"

EL. 10' -8"

1

CARROLL STREET (601

) (NIIRROW STREE11 , , ~n

NYC OWNED P

MECHANICAL

COMMUNITY FACILITY

RESIDENTIAL

__j <( u

~ :r: u w :::;>

RESIDENTIAL

GROUND FLOOR 1" = 30'-o"

RESIDENTIAL

PARKING

RES LOBBY

RES LOBBY

PARKING

2ND STREET (601)

(NARROW STREET]

EL. 6' -4"

RECREATION SPACE

RECREATION SPACE

CARROLL STREET BRIDGE

_j <( u z: <( :r: u w :::;>

__j <(

fz: w 0 (/) w IY

RESIDENTIAL

22' EL. 3'-6"

G) 0

~ z c (f)

§; z )> r

NOTE: FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY

NOTE: SHORELINE CONDITION AND BULKHEAD LOCATION MAY VARY AS REQUIREED BY N y s DEPARTMENT OF ENVIROMENTAL CONSERVATION AND THE us ARMY CORPS OF ENGIN.EERS

363-365 Bond Street

Client:

Goldstein, Hill & West Architects, LLP 11 Broadway, Suite 1700 New York, NY 10004 Tel212.213.8007 Fax 212.686.1754

The Lightstone Group 460 Park Avenue, Suite 1300 New York, NY 10022 Tel: 212.616.9969

Landscape Architects:

Lee Weintraub Landscape Architects 59 Edgecliff Ter Yonkers, NY 10705 Tel: 917.965-6540

Project:

363-365 Bond Street Brooklyn, NY

8/21/2012 MODIFICATION SUBMISSION

6/19/2012 CPC DRAFT

No. Date Revision

ULURP SUBMISSION Title:

Ground Floor

Seal & Signature Date: Project No.: 11 F79 SCALE:

Z-6 cadd file no.: P:\11 F79


APPENDIX B

PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS


APPENDIX C

PREVIOUS CORRESPONDENCE

1

Karen Nespolini

From: David Yudelson <[email protected]>Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:17 PMTo: Christopher McMahon; Steve CiambruschiniSubject: FW: 400 Carroll StreetAttachments: 400 Carroll Street Comments 01 11 12.pdf

From: Brian Carr [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 3:27 PMTo: David YudelsonCc: Christos TsiamisSubject: 400 Carroll Street

David,

Called but you were not available. I spent a number of hours going over the draft Order with mymanagement. Their primary focus is reaching a determination on the scope of the covenant for this, and whetherHQ-approval is required. I don't see any other drafting issues that can't be resolved. I will be in touch ASAP.

On the technical side, EPA has reviewed the conceptual wall design and the only issue identified, the possibilitythat there is unknown contamination at other locations laterally along the bulkhead, is addressed by the fact thatthe cut-off wall is expected to go along the entire frontage of the parcel. Our consultants comments are attachedFYI. Accordingly, the conceptual approach is approved. When your consultant has prepared a detailed design,EPA would like to review that.

We are happy to discuss this further if you have questions.

Thanks for your patience and cooperation,

Brian E. CarrAssistant Regional CounselUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 2Office of Regional Counsel290 Broadway, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10007(212) 637-3170 phone(212) 637-3104 [email protected]

1

M E M O R A N D U M

400 Carroll Street Document Review USEPA

PREPARED BY: CH2M HILL

DATE: January 11, 2012

PROJECT NUMBER: 422395.DE.02

At the request of the USEPA Region 2, CH2M HILL reviewed two documents related to proposed remedial activities being conducted at 400 Carroll Street in Brooklyn, New York (Site). The Site is located within Remedial Target Area (RTA 1) of the Gowanus Canal Superfund Site, as defined in the recent draft Feasibility Study (December, 2011) prepared by CH2M HILL for USEPA Region 2. A subsurface investigation was conducted in 2011 at the Site to delineate the extent of soil impacts in the vicinity of monitoring well GC‐MW43 (Grosser, 2011a). The well was installed as part of the Gowanus Canal Remedial Investigation performed in 2010 (HDR, 2011). The layout of the Site is shown in Figure 1. The 2011 investigation found that non‐aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) identified as coal tar/creosote was present in the subsurface at the Site at depths ranging from approximately 30 to 35 feet below ground surface (bgs). Additional evidence of NAPL staining and sheens was observed at depths ranging from 4 ft bgs to 30 ft bgs. Based upon the type of NAPL identified in the Site subsurface and the concentrations in Site soil compared to Canal sediments, the subsurface investigation report concluded that the NAPL was likely entering the subsurface below the Site from the Canal. A cross section was created across GC‐MW43 (installed as part of the 2010 RI) and boring GP05 (installed as part of the 2011 investigation of the Site), both located on the Site, and boring GC‐SD19C located in the Canal (also installed as part of the 2010 RI), to examine the relationship between NAPL impacts in Site soils and in Canal sediments. The location of the cross section is shown in Figure 2, while the cross section is presented in Figure 3. The boring logs for GC‐MW43, GP‐05, and GC‐SD19C used to construct the cross section are included as Attachment A. In boring GP‐05, only the interval from 25‐30 ft bgs was logged. The fine silty sand observed in this interval had observable free product NAPL present. In GC‐MW43, evidence of NAPL staining or sheen was observed from 4 to 7 ft bgs and again from 25 to 30 ft bgs. Free product was observed in a layer of clayey sand from 30 to 32.5 ft bgs, and another thin lens of free product was observed at 34.5 ft bgs, atop another layer of clayey sand. The sediment boring in the Canal (GC‐SD19C) covered the distance from the top of the soft organic sediment layer (mud line), located at an elevation of ‐8 ft NAVD 88 (corresponding to approximately 18 feet bgs on the upland Site). The boring captured 6.5 feet of soft sediment, and extended an additional 5 ft into the underlying native sediment to a total depth of ‐19.5 ft NAVD 88 (11.5 ft below the mud line, corresponding to an upland Site location of approximately ‐29.5 ft bgs). NAPL staining and coating was observed in the native sediment portion of the core. No NAPL effects were observed in the soft sediment portion of the core. As shown by the cross‐section, NAPL effects are more widespread vertically throughout the Site soils than in the Canal sediments. Additionally, no free product was observed in the Canal sediments in front of the site, while free product was observed in the Site soils. The groundwater in GC‐MW43 was measured at an elevation of approximately 3 feet below ground surface (bgs) (corresponding to an elevation of 7 ft NAVD88) in July 2010. The mean lower level water (MLLW) elevation of the canal is 0 ft NAVD88, or approximately 10 feet below the Site ground surface. The resulting groundwater gradient indicates that shallow groundwater at the Site would flow toward the canal, as was found to be the case for other upland sites along the canal (HDR, 2011). Groundwater discharging into the Canal from the Site indicates that

PREPARED FOR:

400 CARROLL STREET DOCUMENT REVIEW

2

contaminants would likely not be transported based on hydrodynamic forces from the Canal to the Site, as they would have to move against the groundwater gradient. A NAPL gradient from the canal to the upland soils would be needed to transport NAPL upland. This situation does not appear to currently exist, but could have in the history of the canal use. There is an Outfall pipe located along the cross section in question that was speculated to be involved in contaminant transport between the Canal and Upland sites. However, examination of the Outfall survey records from the Remedial Investigation showed that the outfall is located at the tidal interface, between 3 and 0 ft NAVD88. Because this outfall is above the Canal water surface except at high tide, and located well above the elevations where NAPL was observed in the Canal sediments, it is unlikely that the Outfall and associated sewer piping serves as a NAPL transport pathway from the Canal to the Site. Based on the initial conclusions of the Site Investigation, a remedial alternative was proposed that consisted of installing a watertight barrier extending from 20‐35 ft bgs (‐10 to ‐25 ft NAVD88) between the Site and the existing bulkhead along the Canal (Grosser, 2011b). The type of sheet piling proposed in Grosser (2011b) was not specified. CH2M HILL agrees that an impervious barrier with sealed joints and constructed of appropriate materials would likely provide a sufficient barrier for the mitigation of NAPL transport between the Site and the Canal. More clarification is needed to ascertain whether the proposed barrier wall is of sufficient length and depth. While placement of the proposed barrier wall appears to extend above and below the measured NAPL impacts, the data available at GP‐05 may not have completely captured the top and bottom of the NAPL contamination, as the boring was only logged between 25 and 30 ft bgs and product was observed within the complete 25‐30 ft bgs interval (see Figure 3). The memorandum (Grosser, 2011b) does not specify the proposed length of barrier wall to be installed along the Canal. Additional NAPL characterization along the proposed barrier wall is recommended to determine the vertical and lateral extent of NAPL contamination before a final bulkhead barrier wall depth and length are finalized. The barrier depth 10 feet into the native sediment layer (35 ft bgs) appears to be sufficient if significant NAPL impacts are not present below GP‐05. References: HDR, CH2M HILL, and GRB Environmental Services, Inc. (2011). Gowanus Canal Remedial Investigation Report

Volume 1. Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). January. P.W. Grosser Consulting. (2011a). DRAFT Subsurface Investigation Summary Report 400 Carroll Street –Brooklyn,

New York. September 13. P.W. Grosser Consulting. (2011b). Bulkhead Replacement – 400 Carroll Street, Brooklyn, NY. October 25.

Figures

FIGURE 1400 Carroll Street Site LayoutBrooklyn, New York

--w--

M!'li\IT~G

LOCATION

CH2MHILL ..

FIGURE 2400 Carroll Street Cross SectionBrooklyn, New York

Cross Section Location

Native SedimentsGlacial Deposits (silts, sands and gravels)

Soft Sediment

10 ft

0 ft

-10 ft

-20 ft

-30 ft

-40 ft

-50 ft

-60 ft

-70 ft

Elev

atio

n (fe

et N

AVD

88 A

ppro

xim

ate)

-8 ft

-14.5 ft

FIGURE 3400 Carroll Street Cross SectionBrooklyn, New York

GP-05GCMW-43S

GC-SD19C

Bulkhead

NAPL Sheen, Coating, Staining, or Blebs

NAPL Saturation

Legend

Outfall GC-CF-W-043

Well Screen

Sand

SandClayey Sand

Clayey Sand

Clayey Sand

Silty Sand

Silty Clay

Fill – Sand and Gravel

Water Level

Possible Location of Sewer Line

Sand with Silt and GravelProposed Barrier Wall

Attachment A

Project No: SERAS-059

Project: Gowanus Canal Superfund Site

Client: EP AlERT

Location: 400 Carroll St., Brooklyn, NY

Logged By: J. Bolduc

..c -0. <I> 0

SUBSURFACE PROFILE

0 ..0 E >. (/)

Description

Gravel With Sand (GW-SW) Fill Very dark gray, fine and coarse gravel, some fine and coarse sand, little sill, trace well rounded cobbles, coal, brick, and occasional wood fragments, loose, wet, petroleum hydrocarbon sheen and moderate to strong petroleum hydrocarbon odor at 4 feet, strong petroleum hydrocarbon odor at 7 feet.

Silty Clay (CL) Dark gray, low plasticity, soft, plant remains to 15 feet, occasional shell fragments throughout, wet.

GCMW-43S Northing (ft): 186235.390 Log of Well: GCMW-4 GCMW-43S Easting (ft): 987143.769

GCMW-431 Northing (ft): 186235.575

GCMW-431 Easting (ft): 987143.829

GCMW-43S Elevation (ft AMSL): 5.39

GCMW-431 Elevation (ft AMSL): 5.40

SAMPLE

'-<!> .0 E ::I z

<I> 0.

~

2:' <I> > 0 u <I> 0 cr::

0.0

PID Readings ppmv

20 40 60 80 100

12.2 . 3.4

2.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 • 0.0

Well Completion Details

E=:~~...,..,.----------+-~~.r~~-t-+--1 o.o Clayey Sand (SC) Grayish brown, fine grained, some clay, wet.

Drill Method: A300 Rotary Sonic

Start Date: 1300 5/17/10

Hole Size: 8 inches

0.0 • 0.0 •

0.0 • 0.0 .

Lockheed Martin/SERAS 2890 Woodbridge Avenue Building 209 Annex Edison, NJ 08837

Drill Company: Boart Longyear

End Date: 1843 5/17/10

Sheet: 1 of 2

Project No: SERAS-059

Project: Gowanus Canal Superfund Site

Client: EPNERT

Location: 400 Carroll St. , Brooklyn, NY

Logged By: J. Bolduc

.£:

a. (!)

0

SUBSURFACE PROFILE

0 .0 E >. (j)

Description

Silty Sand (SM) Grayish brown, fine grained, trace medium to coarse grained, some silt, wet, spotty petroleum hydrocarbon sheens, faint petroleum hydrocarbon odor. Three.fnch thick wet lens& of silty fine sub rounded gravel and fine sand at 28 feet.

Clayey Sand (SC) Grayish brown, fine grained, some clay, micaceous, dark gray petroleum hydrocarbon staining throughout, stained intervals are saturated with low viscosity brown petroleum

Sand(SP) Very dark g rayish brown, fine grained, trace silt, wet, saturated wi th low viscosity petroleum hydrocarbon In 3· inch thick interval at bottom, strong

odor.

Drill Method: A300 Rotary Sonic

Start Date: 1300 5/17/10

Hole Size: 8 inches

GCMW-43S Northing (ft): 186235.390 Log of Well: GCMW-4 GCMW-43S Easting (ft): 987143.769

GCMW-431 Northing (ft): 186235.575

GCMW-431 Easting (ft): 987143.829

GCMW-43S Elevation (ft AMSL): 5.39

GCMW-431 Elevation (ft AMSL): 5.40

SAMPLE

Well Completion Details '-(!) PID Readings

ppmv ~ :> (!)

.0 E ::J z

0

_,,0

20 40 60 80 100 iJJ

0.0 ~--~~~~--~ ·

13.0

13.0

0.0

0.0 . 0.0 • 0.0

~-=c~=-f.~l----1---1 'o.o

•

15.0

15.0 •

15.0

50.0 •

Lockheed Martin/SERAS 2890 Woodbridge Avenue Building 209 Annex Edison, NJ 08837

Drill Company: Boart Longyear

End Date: 1843 5/17/1 0

Sheet: 2 of 2

Logged By:

0 5 0.0 NA

5 5

10 5

15 5

20 5

25 5 5.0 SP

30 5

Hand Cleared

2.5"

DNEZY

WBL1001400 Carrol Street

GP-05East Stepout Project Manager:

Project Number:

P.W. GROSSER CONSULTING

Depth(ft)

Advance(ft)

Recovery(ft)

GraphicLog

Boring Designation:Boring Location:Project Name:

PAL Environmental

Soil Description

Macro Core

14:55

Direct PushDrilling Method:

Borehole Depth: 30'

Sampling Method:

Completion Time:13:30

Drilling Contractor:Driller Name:

Start Time:

Mike Baldwin

Start Date:

Borehole Diameter:

USCS Code Notes

3/30/2011 3/30/2011Completion Date:

PID - 67.9 ppmFine sand, silt, very dark gray (10YR3/1), wet. (Freeproduct observed)

Pre-probed to 25'

E.O.B. @ 30'

Page 5 of 9

Attempt 1 Refusal? Y/N

Attempt 2 Refusal? Y/N

Site Name: Gowanus Canal Sediment Coring InvestigationProject Number: 395863

Project Location: Gowanus Canal, Brooklyn, New York

Sampling M. Velasquez/CH2M HILL Northing: 672227.64 Penetration (ft): 16' Y

Survey Duration: March-April 2010

Station ID: GC-SD19C Easting: 633769.29

J. Balas/CH2M HILL Datum: NYSP Zone East NAD 83 Date/Time: 3/11/2010 13:50

Crew/Company R. Clennon/CH2M HILL Elevation: -6.4' NAVD88 Recovery (ft) 11.5'

Vessel: R/V Manasquan St.Depart: 14:35 Penetration (ft): NA

ASI - M. Shappell/Captain Depth (ft): 5.7'

St. Arrival: 13:45

Collector Information: T. Himmer/CH2M HILL Log reflects sample as collected – no correction factor

applied for less than 100% core recovery

Date/Time:

Collection: vibracore Logged by: Michael Murphy Recovery (ft)

Depth

below

mud

line (

ft)

Litho

logy

Type

Color (

Munse

ll)

Consis

tency

/ Den

sity

Cemen

tation

/ Plas

ticity

Structu

re

Moistur

e Con

tent

Maxim

um pa

rticle

size

Odor

% grav

el

% san

d

% fine

s

PID R

eadin

g (pp

m)

Sample

IDs (

Single

Lette

r)

Commen

ts

NA

OL 10YR VS N H Wet CS UNC 0% 3% 97%2/1

1 33.1

2

3 11.3

4

5 23.2

Organic: fibrous wood, leaves, and stick fragments

NA

NA

NA

6

6.56.8

7 SW-SM 10YR H N H Wet FS PHC 0% 75% 25% 25.14/3 (strong)

32.88

33.4

9 ML 10YR F N H Wet VFS PHC 0% 90% 10%4/4 (mod) 29.9

SW-SM 10YR H N H Wet FS PHC 15% 60% 25%10 4/4 (strong) 39.1

soil dilatency

No staining or discoloration on soil pores*

Well graded sand with silt and gravel

Transition zone - not sampled

*Well graded sand with siltNAPL coating - blebs of NAPL rising via gravity/

* Single small cobble (subrounded)NAPL staining on and around cobble - slick, lowviscosity, not sticky, brown staining

Additional Notes/Comments: Bottom of core at 11.5'. Core opened at 08:30. * Indicates VOC collection depth.

NA

A

B

141 of 280

Depth

below

mud

line (

ft)

Litho

logy

Type

Color (

Munse

ll)

Consis

tency

/ Den

sity

Cemen

tation

/ Plas

ticity

Structu

re

Moistur

e Con

tent

Maxim

um pa

rticle

size

Odor

% grav

el

% san

d

% fine

s

PID R

eadin

g (pp

m)

Sample

IDs (

Single

Lette

r)

Commen

ts

SW-SM 10YR H N H Wet FS PHC 15% 60% 25%4/3 (strong) 34.5

11BOC= 94.111.5

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

Single small cobble (subrounded)

*

B

C

20Sample Summary:

TCL

VOC

s

TCL

SVO

Cs

TCL

Pest

icid

es

TCL

PCB

s

TAL

Met

als

+ H

g

Cya

nide

TOC

Sulfi

de

Gra

in S

ize

Arc

hive

TCLP

RIC

A X X X X X X X X X X

B X X X X X X X X X X

C X X X X X X X X X X

DEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTU

Reviewed by: Date:

Sample ID

Sample Type

(N/FD/MSD) Sample Date/TimeDepth Interval

(ft)

GC-SD019C-06.8-08.8 N 03/12/2010 08:30 6.8-8.8GC-SD019C-08.8-10.8 N 03/12/2010 08:30 8.8-10.8GC-SD019C-10.8-11.5 N 03/12/2010 08:30 10.8-11.5

TMHimmer 3/12/2010

142 of 280

DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING CITY OF NEW YORK

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW DIVISION

Amanda M. Burden, FAICP, Director Department of City Planning

Robert Dobruskin, AICP. Director James P. Merani, Deputy Director

22 Reade Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1216 Room 4E (212) 720-3420 FAX (212) 720-3495

[email protected]

February 6, 2009 NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF

THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

363-365 Bond Street Project Identification Lead Agency CEQR# 08DCP033K City Planning Commission ULURP#s C090047 ZMK, C090048 ZSK, N090049 ZRK 22 Reade Street, 1W SEQRA Classification: Type I New York, NY 10007 Contact Person Robert Dobruskin, AICP, Director (212) 720-3423 Environmental Assessment and Review Division New York City Department of City Planning Pursuant to City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR), Mayoral Executive Order No. 91 of 1977, CEQR Rules of Procedure of 1991 and the regulations of Article 8 of the State Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) as found in 6 NYCRR Part 617, a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been prepared for the action described below. Copies of the FEIS are available for public inspection at the office of the undersigned. The proposal involves actions by the City Planning Commission and Council of the City of New York pursuant to Uniform Land Use Review Procedures (ULURP). A public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) was held on Wednesday, January 7th, 2009. Comments were requested on the DEIS and were received and considered by the Lead Agency until Tuesday, January 20th, 2009. This FEIS incorporates responses to the public comments received on the DEIS and additional analysis conducted subsequent to the completion of the DEIS. The proposed action is classified as a SEQRA Type I action.

A. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION

Toll Brothers, Inc., (“the applicant”), is seeking discretionary City and State actions in connection with the redevelopment of two blocks located along the west waterfront of the Gowanus Canal in the Gowanus neighborhood of Brooklyn Community District 6. The proposed actions would facilitate a proposal by the applicant to redevelop the parcels with a mix of residential (market rate and affordable), commercial, community facility, and open space uses.

The proposed actions include a zoning text amendment (to Zoning Resolution (ZR) sections 123-63 and 123-90) and a related zoning map amendment to change an existing M2-1 zoning district to a Special Mixed Use District: M1-4/R7-2 (MX). The rezoning would affect two blocks along the west waterfront of the Gowanus Canal. The area of the proposed rezoning is bounded

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K by the midpoints of Carroll Street to the north, Bond Street to the west, 2nd Street to the south, and the channel of the Gowanus Canal to the east. If the proposed rezoning is approved it would allow redevelopment of the project site which encompasses Brooklyn Tax Block 452 (Lots 1 and 15) and Tax Block 458 (Lot 1). Two City-owned parcels on Block 452 (lots 5 and 19), one of which is occupied by an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) facility and the other of which is infrastructure associated with the historic Carroll Street Bridge, are not part of the project site (the area the applicant seeks to redevelop), but are included in the area to be rezoned. Although the text amendment would apply to the entire rezoning area, no new development is expected to occur on these City-owned properties as a result of the proposed actions.

In addition, as part of the proposed actions, sections 23-144, 23-922 and 23-942 would be amended to apply the Inclusionary Housing Program and related floor area regulations to R7-2 zoning districts within the proposed special mixed use district, and to provide for a base FAR of 2.7 and a maximum FAR of 3.6 within the special district. These amendments would add R7-2 districts within Community District 6 in Brooklyn to the list of residential districts in which the Inclusionary Housing Program would be applicable within certain designated areas, and would add the proposed Special Mixed-Use District (specified geographically), as one of the Inclusionary Housing designated districts.

Finally, the applicant is seeking a special permit pursuant to ZR section 74-743 to modify the following requirements within a General Large-Scale Development: (i) height and setback regulations for all buildings in special mixed use districts pursuant to ZR section 123-662; (ii) inner courtyard recess regulations pursuant to ZR section 23-852; and (iii) required rear yards in residential and mixed use districts pursuant to ZR sections 23-45 and 123-651.

Discretionary approvals from State and federal agencies, including the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) will also be required, since the project proposes new stormwater outfalls to the Gowanus Canal, the installation of a new sheet-pile bulkhead along the canal, and possible dewatering during construction.

The applicant shall record a Restrictive Declaration that will limit development of the project site in a manner which is substantially in accordance with the plans which are to be voted on by the City Planning Commission pursuant to the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP) including the provision of a public waterfront open space. The Restrictive Declaration will also provide for the implementation of specific conditions with respect to historic resources, the provision of new storm sewer outfalls at the end of 1st and 2nd Streets at the Gowanus Canal, re-grading of the project site, including 1st Street, to be above the 100-year base flood elevation, and the implementation of the requisite mitigation measures. In addition, measures related to the remediation of hazardous materials on the site would be implemented in accordance with a New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)-approved Restrictive Declaration for the project site. With these measures in place, significant, adverse impacts related to hazardous materials would be avoided during and post construction.

The project site (the area the applicant seeks to redevelop), which totals about three acres (excluding streets), is currently occupied by warehouses, open vehicle storage, and vacant land and buildings. The applicant would redevelop this waterfront property with a predominantly residential development that would include market-rate and affordable housing with community facility and commercial space and accessory parking. In addition, the proposed project would provide approximately 0.7 acres of publicly-accessible waterfront open space on the Gowanus Canal along the entire project waterfront from 2nd Street on the south to Carroll Street on the north.

Page 2

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K Under the proposed Special Mixed-Use District, the rezoning area would have a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 3.6 (with the provision of inclusion of 20 percent of the residential floor area as affordable housing for low-income households). This would allow a development program on the project site that would contain approximately 447 dwelling units (approximately 130 affordable), approximately 2,000 gross square feet (gsf) of community facility space, approximately 2,000 gsf of commercial space (providing commercial goods and services demands), and approximately 268 accessory parking spaces. The total size of the proposed project would be approximately 525,309 zoning square feet (zsf).

If the proposed actions are approved, it is expected that the proposed project would be completed in 2011.

B. DEVELOPMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

The applicant is applying to CPC for discretionary actions that would allow for the redevelopment of a former waterfront industrial site along the Gowanus Canal with residential and other uses and a publicly-accessible waterfront open space. The proposed project would be a privately sponsored redevelopment project on the Gowanus Canal waterfront.

The project site, which is currently zoned for manufacturing use, comprises about three acres of mostly vacant or underutilized land that does not provide public access to the waterfront. The proposed project would redevelop this underutilized land with productive residential, community facility and commercial uses compatible with the surrounding area, including substantial publicly-accessible waterfront open space between 1st and 2nd Streets. The site layout and building configuration would be controlled through the proposed General Large Scale Development (GLSD) permit (see the discussion below). In addition, the mix of housing types would allow market-rate development while providing on-site affordable housing. The mix of uses would include on-site commercial (providing convenient goods and services within a short walking distance for local residents), and on-site community facility space (which the applicant expects will be occupied by the Gowanus Dredgers for equipment storage and community education). These uses would support the site’s waterfront location, attract local residents to the site’s proposed 0.7 acres of publicly-accessible waterfront open space and provide a recreational and aesthetic benefit for future project residents.

C. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED REZONING AREA AND PROJECT SITE

The area of the proposed rezoning is bounded by the midpoints of Carroll Street to the north, Bond Street to the west, 2nd Street to the south, and the Gowanus Canal to the east. The proposed rezoning area includes the project site (the area to be redeveloped) and the two City-owned outparcels. The outparcels contain a City EMS facility and infrastructure (the Operator’s House) associated with the Carroll Street Bridge.

The project site encompasses Brooklyn Tax Block 452 (Lots 1 and 15) and Tax Block 458 (Lot 1). The two blocks of the project site have a combined lot area of approximately 146,000 square feet and approximately 280 linear feet of frontage along Bond Street (excluding the bed of 1st Street), 48 linear feet of frontage along Carroll Street, 430 linear feet of frontage along 2nd Street, and 460 linear feet of frontage along the Gowanus Canal.

The two project blocks are currently zoned M2-1. The existing M2-1 zoning district is a medium-density manufacturing district. It allows industrial uses at a maximum FAR of 2.0 and includes performance standards; it does not allow residential use.

Page 3

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K As shown in Table S-1, current uses on the project site include warehousing, open vehicle storage, vacant buildings. Existing buildings in the rezoning area and on the project site are primarily one- and two-story warehousing/industrial structures. The residential neighborhood of Carroll Gardens is directly to the west of the project site (across Bond Street). To the north and south, and along the east side of the Gowanus Canal, land uses are similar to those on the project site, with active and vacant industrial and mixed non-residential uses.

Table S-1Project Site Current Uses

Block Zoning Lot

(square feet)

Current Built square footage

(gsf) Stories Current Uses

Estimated No.

Employees

458 89,600 43,000 gsf (one building) 1

Storage/warehousing, truck parking/storage, surface

parking 10

452 56,400 46,000

(seven buildings) 1-3 Garment warehouse/distribution, 10

Source: AKRF field survey, January 2008.

D. PROPOSED ACTIONS

NEW YORK CITY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVALS

In order for the proposed project to be developed, New York City Planning Commission (CPC) approval of the following discretionary actions is required:

• Zoning text amendment to: o Sections 123-63 and 123-90 to establish a Special Mixed-Use (MX) District in

Gowanus; o Sections 23-144, 23-922, and 23-942 to apply the Inclusionary Housing Program

to specified R7-2 districts; o Section 23-942 to apply standard height and setback regulations of MX districts

to developments utilizing the Inclusionary Housing Program in certain non-contextual MX districts;

• Amendment to the zoning map changing from an M2-1 district to an M1-4/R7-2 Special Mixed-Use District;

• Special permit pursuant to Section 74-743 to modify bulk regulations for height and setback (Section 123-662), inner court recesses (Section 23-852), and yards (Sections 23-45 and 123-651) in a general large-scale development.

To facilitate the redevelopment of the project site as proposed, the applicant is seeking zoning text amendments to Sections 123-63 and 123-90 of the Zoning Resolution. These text amendments (and related zoning map amendments) would establish a new mixed-use district that would appropriately reflect the uses proposed for the project, and reflect the mixed-use character of the surrounding neighborhood. As described above, the two project blocks are currently zoned M2-1. The proposed zoning district, Special Mixed-Use District M1-4/R7-2 (MX), would be mapped over the two-block area and allow a maximum floor-area ratio (FAR) of 3.6. R7-2 districts allow residential use at a maximum FAR of 3.4 and community facility uses at a maximum FAR of 6.5. The proposed M1-4 district is a manufacturing district that allows light industrial and certain commercial uses at a maximum FAR of 2.0.

Page 4

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K As mentioned above, the two blocks of the project site have a combined lot area of approximately 146,000 square feet. The allowable zoning floor area (zfa) for the project site under the proposed rezoning would be approximately 525,309 zsf. This allowable floor area would be split between the two project blocks, with approximately 202,744 zsf on Block 452 (the northern block, proposed as 363 Bond Street) and approximately 322,565 zsf on Block 458 (the southern block, proposed as 365 Bond Street). The proposed zoning would allow the EMS facility and the Operator’s House (located within the area to be rezoned, but not within the area to be redeveloped) to remain within the rezoning area as conforming uses.

To facilitate the development of affordable housing on the site, the applicant is proposing amendments to sections 23-144, 23-922 and 23-942 of the Zoning Resolution to apply the Inclusionary Housing program and related floor area regulations to R7-2 zoning districts within the proposed special mixed use district. These amendments would add R7-2 districts within Community District 6 in Brooklyn to the list of residential districts in which the Inclusionary Housing Program would be applicable within certain designated areas, and would add the proposed Special Mixed-Use District (specified geographically), as one of the Inclusionary Housing designated districts. This would provide for a base FAR of 2.7 and a maximum FAR of 3.6 within the special mixed use district. Utilizing the bonus in FAR from 2.7 to 3.6, the proposed project would create approximately 447 new dwelling units, up to 130 of which would be permanently affordable for low-income households. Under the proposed project, consistent with City requirements, affordable housing for low-income households is defined as up to 80 percent of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) income limits.

Since the proposed project seeks to participate in the Inclusionary Housing Program within special mixed use districts, the height and setback requirements of section 23-942 (b) (2) would apply to the development. The applicant proposes text amendments that would allow the development of the proposed market rate buildings to comply with the usual MX height and setback regulations within Section 123-662 for R7-2 districts mapped within special mixed-use districts. These would include a maximum base height of 60 feet, setbacks of 10 feet on a wide street and 15 feet on a narrow street, and a maximum building height of 135 feet.

A special permit to facilitate construction of the proposed buildings that do not strictly comply with the height and setback regulations contained within Sections 123-662, 23-852, 23-45 and 123-651 of the Zoning Resolution, will also be required, as follows:

• Section 123-662 ZR sets a maximum base height of 60 feet and maximum building height of 135 feet in R7-2 districts mapped within special mixed use districts. The buildings on the eastern portion of the site are proposed to have a maximum building height of 125 feet, 10 feet below the maximum permitted building height. However, the proposed base heights on the eastern street frontages of both Block 452 and Block 458 fronting on First Street and on Second Street are proposed to be 65 feet above the modified base plane, exceeding by 5 feet the maximum permitted base height within and R7-2 district (Section 123-662 ZR). The portions of the street walls for which a waiver is requested are 148.5 feet in length on Block 452 and 147.5 feet on the First Street frontage and 145 feet on the on the Second Street frontage of Block 458. The proposed maximum base height within these portions is 65 feet above the base plane.

• Inner court recesses must provide a minimum width to depth ratio of 2:1, pursuant to Section 23-852. However, in order to maximize the area of landscaped passive recreation area within each courtyard, one inner court recess with a width to depth ratio of 1:1 in each court is proposed. The proposed waiver will help to provide a superior residential amenity for the residents of the project.

Page 5

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K

• Sections 23-45 and 123-651 require a minimum 30-foot deep rear yard for residential buildings unless they are corner lots or if the zoning lot comprises the entire block. Through lots are permitted to provide rear yard equivalents. Thus, there is no rear yard requirement for the proposed buildings on Block 458, as it comprises an entire City block. However, the development site on Block 452 is comprised of a corner lot, through lot and two interior lots. One of the interior lots (the eastern-most lot on this block) would not provide the required 30 foot rear yard due to the unusual block configuration caused by the city-owned parcel containing the bridge operator’s house and yard for the Carroll Street Bridge. Instead, a minimum 40-foot yard would be provided along the entire canal side.

OTHER CITY, STATE, AND FEDERAL APPROVALS

In addition to discretionary approvals from CPC, design approvals would be required from other City agencies, including DEP and the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT). The New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) will also review and approve the open space design, layout, and furnishings.

Discretionary approvals from State and federal agencies, including DEC, and ACOE will also be required, since the project proposes the installation of a new sheet-pile bulkhead. The design, location and elevation of the proposed bulkhead are subject to the approval of DEC and ACOE. In addition, since the project proposes new outfalls to the Gowanus Canal (from 1st and 2nd Streets), and possible dewatering during construction, permits at the state level are expected to include tidal wetlands (if any bulkhead work is in water shallower than six feet), protection of waters, Long Island well permit (dewatering only), and a Stormwater Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permit for dewatering, construction (i.e., a stormwater pollution prevention plan [SWPPP] during construction and a stormwater outfall discharge from 1st and 2nd Streets).

When permits and approvals are required from State and federal agencies, these agencies are defined as involved agencies under City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR)/the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). Therefore, as the lead agency, the New York City Department of City Planning (DCP) will provide a coordinated review of this EIS with the other involved agencies for the purposes of documenting consistent findings among the decision-making agencies.

E. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

PROPOSED USES AND BUILDING CONFIGURATIONS

The proposed actions would facilitate a proposal by the applicant to redevelop the entire site as proposed, with the new buildings and open space. The development program would result in a total of 602,603 gross square feet (gsf) including residential uses, community facility space, commercial space, and accessory parking (as required under zoning).

The proposed project would include three new building types on each block. The range of building heights would be from 4 to 12 stories (up to approximately 125 feet) with three principal design elements: (1) low-rise building components of approximately 60 feet (6 stories) fronting on Bond Street; (2) low-rise “townhouse” components of approximately 43 feet (4 stories) along the midblocks of 1st and 2nd Streets; and (3) low to mid-rise building components of 5 to 12 stories (up to 125 feet maximum) facing the waterfront open space. Each block would have an enclosed accessory parking garage for the use of its residents that would be located on the ground floor of the buildings. Table S-2 presents the approximate land coverage that would result on the project site with the proposed development.

Page 6


Table S-2Proposed Development Approximate Land Coverage (Excluding Streets)

Project Element Lot Coverage (square feet) Percent of Project Site Publicly-Accessible Open Space 23,165 16

Private Open Space 30,660 21 Pedestrian Access Easements 2, 559 2

4 story Building Elements (Townhouse-style buildings)

14, 715 10

5-6 story Building Elements 44,900 31 7-8 story Building Elements 16,265 11

11-12 story Building Elements 13,685 9 Total 145,949 100%

The residential component of the project would provide a total of 447 dwelling units, up to 130 of which would be reserved for low-income residents. Approximately 268 accessory parking spaces would be provided in two garages located on the ground floor of each block. As shown on the ground floor plan, the commercial space, totaling about 2,000 square feet, would be located along the south side of 1st Street, approximately 50 feet from the waterfront publicly accessible open space. The proposed commercial space would be easily accessible to pedestrians both on the street and on the waterfront open space. The applicant intends to locate a commercial use, such as a local deli or other such business providing local goods and services, in this space. The community facility space, also totaling about 2,000 square feet, would be located along the north side of 2nd Street. The applicant intends to provide this space to the Gowanus Dredgers (a local canoe and kayaking club), for equipment storage and community education. Under the proposed project, the access point to the canal (at the end of 2nd Street) that is currently used by the Gowanus Dredgers would remain, and would be incorporated into the new landscaped open space proposed for the end of 2nd Street.

In addition to the proposed new buildings, the proposed project would include a continuous, privately owned, publicly-accessible open space of approximately 23,165 square feet (about 0.5 acres) along the Gowanus Canal. In addition, approximately 7,656 square feet of landscaped open space at the street ends of 1st and 2nd Street would be provided, for a total of 30,821 (about 0.7 acres) of publicly accessible open space extending from Carroll Street on the north to 2nd Street on the south (as described below). Three pedestrian access easement areas totaling 2,559 square feet will also be provided on the project site along the cul-de-sacs at the street ends.

Principal pedestrian access to the proposed residential units would be from 1st Street and the corner of Bond and 1st Streets for both buildings. Vehicular access to the proposed accessory parking garages would be from 1st Street for both blocks.

The majority of the project site is mapped within a 100-year flood hazard zone. All buildings on the project site would comply with both Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and New York City Building Code requirements regulating construction within flood hazard areas. The applicant proposes to raise the elevations of portions of the project site to reduce the potential for flood damage or impacts on the proposed residential units. The lowest occupied floor elevation would be constructed approximately one foot above the 100-year base flood elevation. The site grade would then slope to match existing street grades along Carroll, Bond, and 2nd Streets. Street ends would also be designed in accordance with all City regulations, including those of the New York City Fire Department (FDNY) (see also the discussion under “Proposed Site and Infrastructure Improvements”).

Page 7

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K PROPOSED OPEN SPACES

PUBLICLY-ACCESSIBLE OPEN SPACE

The proposed project would landscape and improve the entire waterfront along the eastern project site boundary for the purposes of providing public access from the south end of 2nd Street north to a connection with Carroll Street. Thus, the proposed project would improve and link the street ends of 1st and 2nd Streets with publicly-accessible waterfront open space at the two project blocks, approximately 600 linear feet long and a minimum of 40 feet wide.

In area, the proposed project would provide approximately 30,821 square feet (about 0.7 acres) of publicly-accessible open space along the Gowanus Canal waterfront (approximately 23,165 square feet of privately owned, publicly-accessible open space along the eastern border or the project site, connected seamlessly to approximately 7,656 square feet of public open space at the street ends of 1st and 2nd Streets). This open space would provide views along the waterfront as well as opening up new views of the historic Carroll Street Bridge, and would be landscaped with benches and other amenities for the purpose of providing publicly-accessible open space along this stretch of the Gowanus Canal waterfront. The proposed publicly-accessible open space would include planting areas, shade-providing trees, seating, lighting, pedestrian paths (which would be available for jogging and inline skating), a dog run, and other architectural features yet to be designed. A tidal wetland area would be created in the vicinity of the end of Second Street. As mentioned above, DPR will also review and approve the open space design, layout, and furnishings. Development on the site will be controlled pursuant to the special permit to substantially comply with the approved plans which will include the publicly accessible open space. The privately owned, publicly-accessible open space will be constructed, landscaped and maintained pursuant to a Restrictive Declaration that will be recorded for the project site, according to the approved plans. The open space would be managed and maintained by the proposed buildings’ homeowner’s associations. The hours of access are anticipated to be similar to those of City parks. Entrances to the open space would be at three locations, one at the north end (Carroll Street), one at the south end, (2nd Street) and another at the end of 1st Street.

As part of the design of the waterfront open space, the applicant intends to include industrial materials that are evocative of a particular place and time in the history of the development of the canal. This would also include a narrative ribbon that would thread through the handrails, telling the story of the Gowanus Canal, industrial Brooklyn and the legacy of environmental changes.

While the proposed paving materials are not subject to CPC approval, if possible, the applicant has stated that it would seek to either reuse the Belgian block from the pavement on the south sidewalk at the end of 1st Street and on the sidewalks and street at the end of Second Street (which is owned by the City of New York) on the project site’s streetscape or would encourage its salvage and reuse in another location.

In addition, the proposed project would landscape the end of 2nd Street and as part of that design would incorporate the existing access point to the water that is currently used by the Gowanus Dredgers. As described above, the proposed project would include community facility space that would be made available to the Gowanus Dredgers for equipment storage and community education.

PRIVATE OPEN SPACES

In accordance with the City’s Quality Housing provisions, the proposed project would also provide private courtyards within each building. Therefore, an approximately 11,600-square-foot courtyard would be provided in the 363 Bond Street building, and an approximately 19,000-

Page 8

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K square-foot courtyard would be provided in the 365 Bond Street building. Both open spaces, currently un-designed, would provide outdoor recreational space for project residents.

PROPOSED SITE AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS

As stated above, in order to ensure that the proposed buildings would be above the 100-year floodplain, the project site would be graded to raise the base elevation above the local floodplain. All parking and occupiable space would then be constructed one foot above this base grade elevation.

In addition, with respect to site drainage and infrastructure, currently, all of the project site’s sanitary flow and a portion of the site’s stormwater flow from rooftops is conveyed to the Red Hook Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) via the combined sewer in Bond Street. The proposed project would eliminate site-generated stormwater flow from discharging to the combined sewer by installing new separate storm sewers in both 1st and 2nd Streets, with new stormwater outfalls to the Gowanus Canal. These new storm sewers would be designed in accordance with DEP standards. This separation of stormwater would remove the project site's stormwater from the local combined sewer system. The proposed project would also install new catch basins on the west side of the intersection of Bond and 1st Streets, thereby improving local drainage conditions. Stormwater from the project blocks would also be treated through the use of hydrodynamic separators that would remove grease, solid and floatables prior to discharge into the canal. The proposed project would also detain stormwater in the planted interior courtyards, supporting the proposed vegetation. There would also be open tree pits along the streets and planted strips along the waterfront where rainwater would infiltrate to the ground below. Lastly, the street drainage to the canal, in accordance with DEP design, would be provided with DEP standard Type II catch basins with a sump and hood that would prevent solids and floatables from being discharged into the canal.

All sanitary flow from the proposed project would be separately conveyed to the Red Hook WPCP for treatment via the existing combined sewer in Bond Street.

PROPOSED WATERFRONT OPEN SPACE AND BULKHEAD IMPROVEMENTS

Currently, the bulkhead along the project site is a timber crib design that, though currently functioning, could not be utilized or repaired for the purposes of meeting the proposed waterfront access goals of both the project and the City. Therefore, in order to improve the water’s edge to provide waterfront open space, the proposed project would modify the existing infrastructure by installing a new steel sheet pile bulkhead for the entire length of the waterfront. The design, location and elevation of the proposed bulkhead are subject to the approval of DEC and ACOE. Where portions of the existing bulkhead are currently overtopped during high tide events, the existing elevation of the bulkhead may be maintained and an intertidal area may be created landward of the new bulkhead, if required by DEC and/or ACOE. The new bulkhead would either be placed in the same footprint as the existing bulkhead or would be placed against the face of the existing timber crib bulkhead, subject to the approval of DEC and/or ACOE. The preferred design is to place the sheet steel against the face of the existing timber crib bulkhead as it would:

• Avoid the release of upland contaminants into the canal during construction, • Avoid the release of sediments into the canal, • Minimize the disturbance to the waterfront and canal to the greatest extent possible, • Facilitate the most efficient installation of the new bulkhead, • Preserve to the greatest extent possible the State/National Register of Historic Places

(S/NR)-eligible timber bulkhead and crib system, and

Page 9


• Shorten the duration of construction along the shoreline edge, thereby minimizing potential impacts.

The preferred design would require the removal of existing whalers and piles from the existing timber crib bulkhead. In addition, for any new installation an anchoring system consisting of “deadmen” and steel “tie rods” would be installed upland below-grade, and inland of the existing crib (or approximately 40 feet upland). The tie rods would run from the new sheeting to the deadmen approximately every eight feet for the length of the bulkhead. The installation of the tie rods would require four to five foot deep trenches. The installation of the tie rods could potentially require removal of portions of the crib sufficient to allow the steel tie rods to pass through the area. The proposed bulkhead would have a boat fender system on its seaward face. This would be constructed of wood to mimic existing conditions along the canal.

These proposed waterfront infrastructure improvements would impact an historic resource, the Gowanus Canal bulkhead, which the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has determined eligible for listing on the State/National Register of Historic Places as both an archaeological and architectural resource. In order to mitigate impacts to the bulkhead, the reconstructed bulkhead would be faced in wood to match the existing face. In addition, a mitigation plan has been developed to document and recover archaeological information relative to the bulkhead within the area to be disturbed during construction (see “Mitigation,” below).

F. FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS

The environmental review presented in this DEIS examines impacts of a site-specific rezoning and development proposal. It includes the rezoning of the site from M2-1 to M1-4/R7-2 (MX) thereby allowing the development of the proposed project with approximately 447 dwelling units (of which up to 130 would be affordable housing units), commercial space (approximately 2,000 square feet), community facility (approximately 2,000 square feet), and 268 accessory parking spaces.

If approved, the proposed project would also be developed under a GLSD. As a result, the design of the buildings and the open space must be developed in accordance with the special permit that is necessary for the proposed project to move forward. Thus, unlike a proposal that contains only a zoning action, the site-specific development of the proposed project is examined within this DEIS. In addition, as stated above, Restrictive Declarations would be used to implement measures such as hazardous materials cleanup. Thus, in addition to being a zoning action, the proposed project is a site-specific development proposal which significantly defines the project for analysis within this DEIS. Additionally, the project requires State and Federal approvals for improvements along the water’s edge and new outfalls that will be subject to future site-specific engineering designs. These designs are conceptually presented in this DEIS.

The project build year is 2011, which is the year in which it is expected that the proposed project would be occupied.

CEQR requires a comprehensive analysis of proposed actions or projects in the context of other proposals. Thus, the impacts of this project are not measured against currently existing conditions, but are assessed based on the impacts of the project at the time of occupancy and the completion of construction. To assess conditions in the future without the proposed project (“No Build” conditions), the DEIS typically includes known or approved development proposals and other actions that may also be pending (and under environmental review) where the development is expected to occur on or before the occupancy of the proposed project (or 2011 in this case). The conditions in that 2011 No Build analysis year are then projected based on changes in housing and population (for example), and also take into account growth factors (such as traffic)

Page 10

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K and projections from other City agencies (e.g., projected changes in student enrollment). In addition, given that DEP has a major capital improvement proposed at the head of the canal (i.e., the upgrade of the Gowanus pump station and Flushing Tunnel), infrastructure and natural resources conditions have also been assessed in this DEIS for the year 2013, which is after the project’s build year. This analysis was also performed in response to comments and for the purposes of analyzing environmental conditions, with the proposed project in place as well as these major capital improvements.

The projection of conditions through 2011 is also based on a study area that has been identified for each technical analysis. In many cases, these study areas have been expanded in response to public comments received through the scoping process for the EIS.

Impacts of the proposed project in the analysis year (“Build” conditions) are then measured against the “No Build” conditions in order to determine the incremental impacts of the proposed project and the levels of impact significance based on the guidelines of the CEQR Technical Manual.

Currently, the New York City Department of City Planning Commission is considering an areawide rezoning for the Gowanus Canal area. This draft rezoning proposal was presented to the public at a public meeting of the Community Board 6 Land Use Committee on May 29th, 2008 (this proposal was previously presented as a Gowanus Canal Corridor Framework by DCP). In the forthcoming months, the draft rezoning proposal will be refined and is expected to be released formally in a Draft Scope of Work for the purposes of preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed areawide rezoning in early 2009. That Scope of Work will include a Reasonable Worst Case Development Scenario that will identify projected and potential sites that could be developed under the DCP area-wide rezoning proposal.

G. PROBABLE IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT

LAND USE, ZONING, AND PUBLIC POLICY

The proposed project would allow the project site to be redeveloped with a predominantly residential development that would include market-rate and affordable housing with community facility and commercial space and accessory parking. In addition, the proposed project would also provide approximately 0.7 acres of publicly-accessible waterfront open space on the Gowanus Canal along the entire project waterfront from 2nd Street on the south to Carroll Street on the north. The City-owned parcels in the rezoning area would not be redeveloped as a result of the proposed projects. As described below, this analysis concludes that the proposed project would be consistent with surrounding uses and existing neighborhood trends, and as such would have no significant adverse impacts on land use, zoning, or public policy in the study area. In addition, the proposed project would promote the objectives of and be consistent with the goals of public policy initiatives that affect the project site. Specifically, the proposed project would be consistent with the applicable initiatives and goals described in PlaNYC.

SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS

The socioeconomic analysis concludes that the proposed project would not have a significant adverse impact on socioeconomic conditions in the study area. The introduction of residential units, community facility and commercial uses, and accessory parking as planned under the proposed project would have no significant direct or indirect adverse impacts on population, housing stock, or economic activities in the local study area, nor would it adversely affect regional economic conditions of a specific industry.

Page 11

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K COMMUNITY FACILITIES

Overall, the proposed project would not have significant adverse impacts on community facilities. This accounts for updated generation rates for day care and schools published since the date of the DEIS. The proposed project would not generate a population large enough to impact libraries or health facilities; nor would it directly or indirectly impact police services or fire services or facilities. The schools analysis concludes that even with the student-age population generated by the proposed project, there would be sufficient capacity in the local public schools to accommodate this added demand. The day care analysis estimates that the proposed project would generate approximately 69 children under the age of 6 who would be eligible for publicly funded day care programs, and approximately 25 children between the age of 6 and 12 who would be eligible for publicly funded after school day care programs. Even with these additional eligible children, day care facilities within 1 mile of the project would remain below capacity with available slots. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in significant adverse community facility impacts on schools or day care facilities.

OPEN SPACE

The proposed project would not result in any significant adverse open space impacts. The proposed project would introduce new residents, but would also create approximately 0.7 acres of new waterfront open space along the canal. As a result, passive open space ratios would increase slightly in the future with the proposed project, and the total residential open space ratio would remain the same. The active open space ratio would decrease by 3 percent. However, because the study area has a low active open space ratio, other factors must be considered to demonstrate that even this small decrease in the active open space ratio does not result in a significant adverse impact.

In this instance, a number of factors demonstrate that although the study area has a low active open space ratio and this ratio would decrease with the proposed project, this decrease would not constitute a significant adverse impact. First, it is recognized that the DCP guidelines for active open spaces are not attainable in many areas of the city, and are not considered impact thresholds. Moreover, the quantitative effects of the proposed project on the active open space ratio would be very limited; the ratio would decrease by only 0.01 acres per 1,000 people with the proposed project.

Finally, the quantitative analysis does not account for the approximately 66.77 acres of mostly active open space in Red Hook Park and the Red Hook Recreation Area, which are located just outside of the study area. It is likely that residents of the proposed project would make use of this significant recreational space (which includes athletic facilities such as soccer and softball fields), thus allaying the shortage of active open space predicted by the quantitative analysis. In addition, the proposed 0.7-acre publicly-accessible open space along the canal was considered entirely passive in the quantitative portion of this analysis, but active recreation such as jogging or cycling would be allowed within the publicly accessible open space, and would be expected to occur, especially if similar amenities are built along other portions of the canal beyond the proposed project’s 2011 Build year. The proposed project would also include private residential amenity space such as an accessory gym and private open spaces in building courtyards for its residents. These private amenities would likely serve to reduce the impact of the project’s residents on active open spaces in the study area. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a significant adverse impact on active or passive open space in the study area.

Page 12

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K SHADOWS

The proposed project would not result in significant adverse shadow impacts on any existing publicly-accessible open spaces, sun-sensitive features of nearby historic resources or important natural features.

HISTORIC RESOURCES

ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES

The proposed project would construct a new steel sheet pile bulkhead along the length of the eastern boundary of the project site either in place of or outside of the existing, archaeologically sensitive bulkhead to make possible the construction of the proposed waterfront open space along the canal. The installation of the new bulkhead could require removal of portions of the existing one. In addition, two new stormwater outfalls would be constructed through the existing bulkhead—one at the end of 1st Street and the other at the end of 2nd Street. LPC has determined that the bulkhead rehabilitation work and storm water outfall installation would adversely impact portions of the bulkhead at the project site. Therefore, an archaeological field investigation would be undertaken in coordination with LPC that would document the extent and significant characteristics of the Gowanus Canal bulkhead. This archaeological documentation would serve as mitigation of the adverse impact to the bulkhead under CEQR. This field investigation would occur either in advance of or in concert with the bulkhead reconstruction and storm water outfall installation. An Archaeological Testing Protocol in compliance with the LPC Guidelines for Archaeological Work in New York City would be prepared and implemented in coordination with LPC. In addition, as requested by SHPO, an Unanticipated Discovery Plan for both human and non-human remains would be prepared in consultation with SHPO and implemented during project-related construction at the site.

ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES

Project Site All of the buildings on the project site would be demolished under the proposed project. None of the buildings that would be demolished are considered contributing elements within the S/NR-eligible Gowanus Canal Historic District. As noted above, the proposed project would rehabilitate the Gowanus Canal bulkhead. It is anticipated that the reconstructed bulkhead would be faced in wood to match the existing bulkhead. To avoid adverse effects on the historic character of the bulkhead, the project sponsors would consult with SHPO on the designs of the new bulkhead, including submitting plans for the rehabilitation to SHPO at the preliminary and pre-final design stages.

Primary Study Area The Carroll Street Bridge and Operator’s House (S/NR-eligible; NYCL) is an architectural resource located within 90 feet of projected construction activities. To avoid any construction-related impacts to this resource, a Construction Protection Plan (CPP) would be developed and implemented in consultation with LPC, SHPO, and NYCDOT prior to project demolition and construction activities. No other architectural resources are located close enough to the project site to experience potential construction-period impacts.

The proposed project would somewhat alter the context of the Carroll Street Bridge in that it would involve the demolition of industrial buildings adjacent to the resource and the construction of a taller residential complex on the site. However, the Carroll Street Bridge is significant primarily for its unique engineering, which significance would not be affected by the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would not impact the qualities that qualify it for NYCL

Page 13

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K status or S/NR eligibility. An engineering study has determined that no cumulative adverse impacts on the bridge would result from projected traffic increases associated with the proposed project. In addition, the proposed project would create new public access to and along the Gowanus Canal including an esplanade and plaza area adjacent to the Carroll Street Bridge. This amenity would be expected to improve access to, and the visibility of, the Carroll Street Bridge. Therefore, the proposed project is not expected to have an adverse impact on the Carroll Street Bridge.

Two features that contribute to the S/NR-eligible Gowanus Canal Historic District are located within the project’s 400-foot study area: the Former BRT Power House (located across the canal, roughly 300 feet east of the project site), and the Gowanus Canal Waterway (which runs immediately adjacent to the project site). While the context of the Power House and the Waterway would change somewhat with the construction of the project, this change would not constitute a significant adverse impact. Furthermore, the proposed masonry and glass buildings have been designed to complement the character of the nearby residential district. The SHPO has determined that the proposed project would have no adverse effect on the S/NR-eligible Gowanus Canal Historic District provided that proposed landscape plans for the portion of the project site along the canal are submitted to SHPO for review and comment at preliminary and pre-final design stages.

With the proposed project, the context of the 59-97 Second Street rowhouse block, determined National Register-eligible as part of this project and located roughly 150 feet west of the project site, would also be somewhat altered by the addition of a modern residential complex nearby. However, views from the potential historic rowblock to the project site are limited, because views from the rowhouse block are generally oriented south, while the project site is located to the northeast. Furthermore, the portions of the proposed project located closest to the potential historic resource would be low-rise while the taller, mid-rise components would be located farther away. Therefore, no significant adverse contextual impacts to the potential historic resource would occur.

Secondary Study Area The Carroll Gardens Historic District is located in the secondary study, roughly 500 feet west of the project site. Views to the project site from the Carroll Gardens Historic District are extremely limited due to the relatively long distance to the project site, the presence of intervening buildings, and the street orientation. Furthermore, the project buildings have been designed with low-rise elements in the western portion of the project site (the portion closest to the Carroll Gardens Historic District) and the medium-rise elements further east, thus further minimizing any views of the project buildings that may be available from the Carroll Gardens Historic District. Therefore, the proposed project would not substantially alter the context or visual character of the Carroll Gardens Historic District, and would have no adverse impact on the resource. Therefore, the proposed project would not substantially alter the context or visual character of the Carroll Gardens Historic District, and would have no adverse impact on this resource.

Other known and potential architectural resources are located in the secondary study area. These are situated relatively far (between roughly 450 feet and ½ mile) from the project site and therefore would not be directly impacted by the proposed project. In terms of potential indirect impacts, current views to the project site from the architectural resources in the secondary study area are either limited or nonexistent. No important views to or from the architectural resources in the secondary study area would be blocked as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, no adverse impacts to architectural resources in the secondary study area would result from the proposed project.

Page 14

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K URBAN DESIGN AND VISUAL RESOURCES

This analysis concludes that the proposed project would not have a significant adverse impact on urban design and visual resources. Although changes would occur, the proposed project would substantially improve the condition of the project site and create new waterfront access for the neighborhood. The proposed residential buildings would be taller and have a greater footprint than the existing buildings on the site. However, these changes would not have a significant adverse impact on urban design or on the overall visibility of visual resources from public spaces within the study areas. The proposed project has been designed to maintain as much as possible the low-rise character of the nearby blocks and to blend with the streetscapes of surrounding neighborhood. The proposed project is expected to enhance the overall vitality of the surrounding streets by introducing residential uses and a waterfront esplanade from which the public would be afforded an improved view of many visual resources, including the canal itself. Therefore, the proposed project would reflect a reasonable balance between existing and proposed building heights, and bulk and new open space without causing any significant adverse impacts.

NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER

The analysis concludes that the proposed project would not have a significant change in neighborhood character with respect to land use, urban design and visual resources, historic resources, socioeconomic conditions, traffic and pedestrians and noise. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a significant adverse impact on neighborhood character. The proposed project would contain new market rate and affordable housing with supporting commercial and community facility uses and publicly-accessible open space, extending the residential character of nearby residential neighborhoods eastward onto the two project blocks. The proposed project has been designed to maintain as much as possible, the low-rise character of the project blocks, and to blend with the streetscapes of surrounding neighborhood. The existing one- to two-story buildings on the project site would be replaced with six-story building components along Bond Street, four-story townhouse components in the mid-block sections, and medium-rise components located further east on the project site. By distributing the respective building heights in this manner, Bond Street’s low-rise character would be maintained. The proposed buildings would be subject to the quality design requirements of a general large-scale development plan to ensure that the design of the proposed structures would not conflict with the neighborhood. It would also meet the Quality Housing Provision of the City. The proposed project would provide much needed local housing, both market rate and affordable, meeting the City’s objectives of maintaining a mix of housing types in the local community. Community facility space and amenities would also be provided for the local neighborhood. In addition, the proposed project would introduce a new publicly-accessible landscaped waterfront esplanade (approximately 0.7 acres) from which the public would be afforded an improved view of many visual and historic resources, including the historic Carroll Street Bridge, the Former Brooklyn Transit Power House, the canal itself and its bulkheads. This would be the first such open space along this stretch of the canal. While there would be increased pedestrian and vehicular activity on local streets, these increases would not be expected to significantly affect any of the neighborhoods in the study area. Any projected traffic impacts would be mitigated. In addition, any impacts to the on-site bulkheads would be mitigated through an archaeological investigation that would have the potential to yield knowledge as to the historical methods used in developing the canal. It is anticipated that the reconstructed bulkhead would be faced in wood to match the existing, and the project sponsors would coordinate the design with SHPO to ensure that the bulkhead design is in keeping with the historic character. The redevelopment of the two blocks would also provide for the environmental cleanup of the site.

Page 15

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K NATURAL RESOURCES

GROUNDWATER

The proposed project would not result in any significant adverse impacts on groundwater including groundwater conditions, flow or quality. Rather, “Hazardous Materials,” as part of the remediation of the project site prior to construction, the proposed project would remove on-site sources of groundwater contamination, thus providing a benefit with respect to local groundwater quality. In addition, the proposed bulkhead would have more than enough capacity to accommodate the projected flow of groundwater from stormwater recharge on the project site. Therefore, it can be concluded that the proposed project would not adversely impact groundwater conditions along the canal or in the surrounding area.

WETLANDS

The proposed project would install approximately 555 linear feet of steel sheet pile bulkhead either in place of or against the existing timber sheathing along the Gowanus Canal. An intertidal area in the vicinity of the end of 2nd Street where the canal overtops the bulkhead would, subject to DEC and ACOE approval, be maintained and upgraded. Installation of the new sheet pile bulkhead may result in minimal loss (i.e., approximately 300 square feet) of DEC littoral zone tidal wetlands that may be located within the footprint of the new bulkhead. Therefore, a de minimis impact on littoral zone wetlands would occur as a result of bulkhead installation. This impact would be minimized to the extent possible through the implementation of measures identified during the permitting process for these shoreline improvements by federal and state agencies. This de minimis impact would not be considered a significant impact on tidal wetlands that would require mitigation. In addition, any de minimis filling would be offset by the creation of a tidal wetland area of the same square footage and transitional plantings in the vicinity of the end of 2nd Street).

TERRESTRIAL RESOURCES

No significant adverse impacts would occur with respect to terrestrial resources. Currently, the project site is 95 percent impervious surface cover with scattered invasive plants indicative of disturbed conditions. The construction of the proposed project would create approximately 0.7 acres of waterfront open space that would be planted with a variety of native and ornamental trees, shrubs, grasses, and herbaceous perennials. More than 30 trees would be planted including American redbud (Cercis Canadensis), oaks (Quercus spp.), and beech (Fagus spp.) (the applicant will consult with the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) to ensure that all street tree and publicly-accessible open space tree species planted on-site are appropriate for the project area and are not known Asian Longhorn Beetle (ALB) host species). This habitat enhancement along the water’s edge would provide potential habitat for common songbirds, small mammals, and pollen-dependent species (e.g., honeybee and butterfly species).

AQUATIC RESOURCES

Water Quality Currently, approximately one-third of the project site’s stormwater runoff is untreated and discharged to the combined sewer in Bond Street. Under the proposed project, no stormwater from the project site would be discharged to this combined sewer and all stormwater from the two project blocks would be collected, treated, and discharged to new storm sewers to be constructed beneath 1st and 2nd Streets, which would then outlet into the Gowanus Canal. Stormwater pollutant loads from the project site would be reduced in the proposed project condition due to the conversion of industrial uses and existing paved surfaces to residential uses and proposed

Page 16

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K landscaped areas, the latter of which would also reduce the amount of total runoff from the project site. With the proposed project relative to site-generated runoff, there would be a reduction in existing pollutant loads to the canal of approximately 21 percent of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), 44 percent of the total phosphorus, 47 percent of the total nitrogen, and 38 percent of total suspended solids (TSS). Stormwater would be treated through the use of best management practices (BMPs). Therefore, the proposed project is expected to improve water quality conditions near the project site with the resulting benefits for aquatic biota. In addition, the proposed project would not result in significant adverse impacts on CSO flow, and the number of CSO events in the downstream combined sewer system, and therefore would not adversely impact the water quality of the canal. Water quality modeling results show the proposed project would not result in any water quality impacts on the Gowanus Canal for principal water quality parameters such as dissolved oxygen and pathogens.

Aquatic Biota The installation of the steel sheet pile bulkhead either in place of or against the existing timber sheathing has the potential to result in short-term construction related impacts to water quality and aquatic biota that would not be significant. These impacts may include localized increases in suspended sediment and re-suspension of contaminated sediments, temporary loss of fish habitat, and a de minimis disturbance to benthic communities during the installation of the existing shoreline stabilization features. Because the increase in suspended sediment would be localized and temporary, no significant adverse impacts would occur to aquatic biota. The loss of some benthic habitat and some macroinvertebrates during the removal of portions of the existing timber bulkhead and installation of the new bulkhead would not result in significant adverse impacts to populations of macroinvertebrates, as limited populations have been observed using this portion of the Gowanus Canal, nor would it significantly impact the food supply for fish foraging in the area. Encrusting organisms and benthic macroinvertebrates would be expected to recolonize the new bulkhead shortly after construction is completed. In addition, based on water quality modeling results, no significant adverse impacts to water quality are expected, and therefore no residual or secondary impacts on aquatic resources would occur. It should be noted however, that although not significant, the impacts associated with an in-place replacement of the bulkhead would be greater than with the preferred design (new sheet pile placed against the existing timber sheathing).

ENDANGERED, THREATENED, AND SPECIAL CONCERN SPECIES

No threatened, endangered, or special concern species have been identified on or in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts to threatened or endangered species or special concern species would occur as a result of the proposed project.

ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT

No significant adverse impacts on fish listed by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) as having essential fish habitat (EFH) for this area would result from the proposed project.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Construction at the project site would entail demolition of the existing buildings on the project site, raising the existing elevation by approximately 0 to 6 feet depending on site topography, and subsequent construction of new foundations. Prior to or as part of any new construction at the project site, the project sponsor would undertake the following actions:

• Any drums, chemicals, and remaining equipment would be removed and disposed of off-site in accordance with all applicable regulations.

Page 17


• Demolition of the existing structures would be in accordance with applicable federal, state, and City requirements relating to asbestos, lead paint and disposal of solid waste.

• Any found Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) and existing Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) would be registered with DEC, then removed in accordance with DEC requirements.

• Any excavated soils and fill materials would be removed from the site and properly disposed of in accordance with all applicable DEC regulations and at an appropriate disposal facility.

All subsurface soil disturbance would be performed in accordance with a RAP/CHASP. The RAP would provide for the appropriate handling, stockpiling, testing, transportation and disposal of these materials in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local regulations. The CHASP would ensure that all such work is done in a manner protective of both human health and the environment. The RAP/CHASP was approved by the New York City Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) on January 29, 2009. These measures will be implemented in accordance with a DEP-approved Restrictive Declaration for the project site. Further, with respect to active spill numbers, the remediation would also be undertaken in consultation with DEC.

With these measures in place, significant adverse impacts related to hazardous materials would be avoided during and post construction.

WATERFRONT REVITALIZATION PROGRAM

Because the proposed project is located within the City’s Coastal Zone, it is subject to the policies of the New York City Waterfront Revitalization Program (WRP), which establishes the City’s policies for development and use of the waterfront and provides a framework for evaluating activities proposed in the Coastal Zone. The proposed project would be consistent with the City’s 10 WRP policies and standards. It would encourage greater public use of the coastal zone and improve water quality through the elimination of currently uncontrolled pollutant flows into the Gowanus Canal.

INFRASTRUCTURE

The proposed project would not result in any significant adverse impacts related to infrastructure.

WATER SUPPLY

Water demands of the proposed project would not overburden the City’s water supply system. Based on the CEQR Technical Manual, the incremental 114,032 gallons per day (gpd) of water supply demand from the proposed project would not adversely affect the capacity of the City’s water supply system in providing water to the proposed project site nor would it impact water pressure for local users. Moreover, project-specific calculations developed by the applicant have disclosed that with the use of low flow fixtures the actual water demand rate would be much less than that projected under the CEQR Technical Manual, or 56,200 gpd, about half of the CEQR rates.

SANITARY SEWAGE

The Red Hook WPCP currently handles approximately 33 million gallons per day (mgd) of sewage flow and is designed to treat a dry weather flow of 60 mgd. Based on the CEQR Technical Manual, the added sanitary sewage discharge of approximately 114,032 gallons per day (gpd) resulting from the proposed project represents approximately 0.4 percent of the current 33 mgd of flow handled by the Red Hook WPCP. Thus, the projected increase in sanitary sewage resulting from the proposed project would not cause the Red Hook WPCP to exceed its

Page 18

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K operational capacity or the New York State Pollution Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permitted capacity of 60 mgd. In addition, as stated above, project-specific calculations developed by the applicant have disclosed that with the use of low flow fixtures the actual water demand rate would be much less than that projected under the CEQR Technical Manual, or 56,200 gpd, about half of the sanitary wastewater rates used in this conservative impact analysis using CEQR rates.

STORMWATER

Currently, approximately one-third of the project site’s stormwater runoff is discharged to the combined sewer in Bond Street. Under the proposed project, two new stormwater sewers would be installed (one at 1st Street and one at 2nd Street) that would convey all site-generated stormwater to the Gowanus Canal via two new storm sewer outfalls also to be constructed as part of the proposed project. Both of these new outfalls would require a SPDES permit from the DEC. In addition, to meet DEC requirements, the proposed project would provide pre-treatment for all stormwater collected from the two project blocks, prior to discharge to the storm sewers. This aspect of the project would eliminate any storm flows from the project site reaching the Bond Street combined sewer. Thus, with the proposed project, the project site would not contribute any stormwater flows to the combined sewer or to combined sewer overflow (CSO) discharges to the canal (see the discussion below). In addition to removing stormwater from the project site, the project also proposes to redirect stormwater runoff from the street in the area around Bond Street at 1st Street away from the combined sewers by providing drainage inlets at this location and connecting these inlets to the proposed new storm sewer to be built in 1st Street. The redirection of this additional stormwater runoff would improve conditions relative to local street flooding at this location.

COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW (CSO) AND WATER QUALITY

An engineering modeling analysis was undertaken of the potential for the proposed project to affect CSO conditions along the Gowanus Canal. The nearest downstream combined sewer overflow location (CSO) from the project site is identified as RH-035 and is located at 4th and Bond Streets. As stated above, based on the CEQR Technical Manual, sanitary sewage generated by the project site would increase by approximately 114,032 gpd or 0.18 cubic feet per second (cfs) with the proposed project. This flow would be directed to the Bond Street combined sewer. However, as described above, the proposed project would also modify current stormwater flow patterns at the site by installing new storm sewers and creating new buildings and open spaces. As a result, with the proposed project, stormwater runoff from the project site would be conveyed through two new storm sewers that would outlet to the Gowanus Canal. In addition, with the treatment of the separated project stormwater runoff, a reduction in pollutant loadings from the project site to the Gowanus Canal would occur, providing a benefit for the water quality of the canal.

Based on infrastructure and water quality modeling using both CEQR Technical Manual sanitary flow rate calculations (approximately 114,032 gpd) and actual project-specific sanitary flow rates (56,200 gpd, about half of the CEQR-calculated rates), the following conclusions can be made:

• The proposed project would not result in any increase in the number of annual CSO events that are projected to occur in the canal in 2011 (73 total events).

• In 2011, assuming the CEQR Technical Manual sanitary flow rate calculations for the proposed project, there would be a very limited projected increase in CSO volume to the canal (over the 2011 No Build condition) of approximately 0.8 MG/yr (or 0.2 percent of the total CSO discharge to the canal).

Page 19


• In 2011, assuming the project-specific sanitary flow rates (which incorporates actual design features such as low-flow fixtures), there is a limited projected decrease in CSO volume to the canal over the course of the year, of approximately 100,000 gallons annually.

• In no scenario would the proposed project result in any water quality impacts on the Gowanus Canal for principal water quality parameters such as dissolved oxygen and pathogens.

In 2013, proposed DEP improvements at the Gowanus Pump Station and the Gowanus Flushing Tunnel are scheduled to be completed. Once in place, these upgrades would significantly improve the water quality of the canal and also reduce the impact of the proposed project on CSO volumes. The improvements at the pump station would reroute flow directly to the Columbia Street Interceptor via a new force main, thereby relieving the Bond Street sewer, thus reducing the CSO discharges to the canal by eliminating the use of Bond Street combined sewer as a bypass. These actions would reduce the impact of the incremental sanitary flow contribution from the proposed project resulting in an overall reduction in the CSO volume. In addition, the upgrade and restoration of the Gowanus Flushing Tunnel would improve circulation through the canal. Both of these DEP capital improvement projects would improve the water quality of the Gowanus Canal and the proposed project would not adversely affect the water quality benefits that are projected with these system upgrades. Additional modeling results show that:

• The proposed project would not result in any increase in the number of CSO events that are projected to occur in the canal in 2013 with the proposed Gowanus Pump Station improvements in place (33 total events).

• In 2013 (with the Gowanus Pump Station and Gowanus Flushing Tunnel upgrades in place), assuming the CEQR Technical Manual sanitary flow rate calculations for the proposed project, the proposed project would result a projected decrease in CSO volumes of 0.1 MG discharged to the canal over the course of the year.

• In 2013 (with the Gowanus Pump Station and Gowanus Flushing Tunnel upgrades in place), assuming the project-specific sanitary flow rates, there would be a reduction in CSO volumes of 0.1 MG discharged to the canal over the course of the year. See Appendix C, Table 1.

SOLID WASTE AND SANITATION SERVICES

The proposed project would result in a net increase over existing conditions of approximately 1.12 tons of solid waste per day in 2011. Although the proposed project would create new demand for the disposal of solid waste, municipal and private solid waste services would have adequate capacity to meet these increases in demand. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any significant adverse impacts on solid waste and sanitation services.

ENERGY

The proposed project would result in added energy demand of approximately 78,480 million British Thermal Units (BTUs), which would constitute less than 0.02 percent of the total peak energy demand for New York City in 2011, and is not considered to be significant. Therefore, the energy demand from the proposed project would be met and the proposed project would not result in any significant adverse impacts on energy systems.

Page 20

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K TRAFFIC AND PARKING

TRAFFIC

For the streets around the site, future intersection volumes would generally represent an increase over the existing traffic volumes, and the street capacities at majority of the locations would be sufficient to accommodate these increases.

Based on the CEQR standards, the proposed project could result in significant impacts at the following two signalized intersection approaches:

• The eastbound approach of Carroll Street at 3rd Avenue during the AM and PM peak hours; and

• The eastbound approach of Carroll Street at 4th Avenue during the AM and PM peak hours.

The eastbound approach of Carroll Street at 3rd and 4th Avenues operates at congested levels (Level of Service [LOS] F) during both the AM and PM peak hours in the No Build conditions. With the proposed project in place, the moderate increase in traffic levels (up to 38 vehicles during any given peak hour) at the eastbound Carroll Street approach at 3rd Avenue and 4th Avenue would result in significant traffic impacts.

While the delay at the eastbound approach of 1st Street at Bond Street would also increase significantly during the AM peak hour (from 18.7 seconds in the No Build conditions to 48.8 seconds in Build conditions), this increase in delay would not be considered a significant impact based on the CEQR guidelines, since fewer than 90 passenger-car-equivalents (PCEs) were identified at this approach during the AM peak hour in the 2011 Build conditions.

PARKING

The proposed project would provide approximately 268 accessory spaces, which would accommodate the majority of the project’s residential parking demand. The remaining parking demand would be accommodated by the on-street parking available in the study area. Therefore, the proposed project would not significantly impact the supply of parking in the study area.

TRANSIT AND PEDESTRIANS

SUBWAYS

The area is served by multiple subway lines, including the F and G along Smith Street (with two entrances), and the M and R subway lines along 4th Avenue at Union Street. Therefore, it is not expected that any single subway element (e.g., entrances or stairs) would experience trips in excess of the CEQR Technical Manual guideline threshold of 200. Therefore, the proposed project is not expected to result in significant adverse impacts to subway conditions.

BUSES

The number of bus trips generated by proposed project would be significantly below the CEQR threshold; therefore, a detailed analysis of bus service conditions is not warranted and no significant adverse impacts would occur.

PEDESTRIANS

The proposed project is not expected to result in significant adverse impacts to pedestrian circulation in the area; on the contrary, it would provide multiple pedestrian entrances/exits to the residential buildings and to the proposed commercial and community facility spaces. It would improve sidewalks along the project streets, provide new public pedestrian connections to the

Page 21

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K new public open space along the Gowanus Canal and open new means of local pedestrian circulation. Therefore, no detailed analyses of pedestrian conditions are warranted.

AIR QUALITY

Air quality analyses for an environmental impact statement (EIS) typically consider four potential sources of pollutants and areas of air quality impacts: 1) the potential for pollutants from mobile sources (such as cars and trucks) to impact the ambient environment; 2) the potential for pollutants from the proposed heating systems to impact the surrounding environment and nearby residential buildings; 3) the potential for future residents of a residential building to be impacted by emissions from nearby industrial or commercial uses; and 4) the potential for pollutants from garages to impact ambient air quality. With respect to mobile source analyses, the proposed project would not generate enough vehicular traffic to result in an air quality impact from mobile sources. To ensure that the development would not result in any significant air quality impacts from HVAC emissions, an (E) designation would be provided as part of the proposed zoning. The text of the (E) designation would be as follows:

Tax Block 452, Tax Lots 1, 15: Any new development must use natural gas as the type of fuel for HVAC systems. Boiler exhaust stack(s) for all development shall be located on the highest tier of each building. Tax Block 458, Lot 1: Any new development must use natural gas as the type of fuel for HVAC systems. Boiler exhaust stack(s) for all development shall be located on the highest tier of each building.

With these restrictions in place, no significant adverse air quality impacts would result from the proposed project’s HVAC systems.

With respect to local industrial sources, it was determined based on air permits for nearby industrial operations (e.g., concrete batching plants) and air quality modeling of these facilities that future project residents would not experience significant adverse air quality impacts from nearby industrial sources. The garage analysis found that neither future project residents nor the surrounding neighborhood would be impacted by the proposed on-site parking garages.

In addition, to these four analyses, an analysis was performed to determine if local odor conditions near the project site could impact the proposed project. Based on real-time sampling of odors at the project site, it was determined that during periods with weather conditions conducive to high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (H2S)—an indicator of potential odors—near the Gowanus Canal, the hourly average concentration of H2S could exceed the nuisance-based standard for this pollutant, resulting in a significant adverse odor impact.

NOISE

The proposed project would not result in any significant adverse stationary or mobile source noise impacts. In addition, noise levels in the proposed project’s new publicly-accessible open space areas, principally from vehicular traffic on the adjacent streets, would not result in a significant noise impact.

CONSTRUCTION

Construction of the proposed project is expected to last approximately 24 months, beginning in April 2009 and ending in 2011.

Prior to construction, environmental remediation would be performed to address any hazardous materials currently existing on the site and demolition of the existing buildings.

Page 22

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K Construction of the proposed project would involve several stages, some which would overlap: demolition of the existing buildings and environmental remediation; excavation/grading, foundation; building structure construction; and interior construction and finishing. Construction would generally proceed simultaneously on both blocks comprising the project site. Activities would begin with demolition of the existing buildings, and any required remediation of the site. Milling and crushing of any demolished materials approved for reuse, if any, would also be done during this stage of construction. Concurrently, the site would be graded, and the driving of piles for support of the building foundations and new sewer lines, as well as the driving of sheet piles for the restoration of the canal bulkhead would also be performed. Foundations work would then begin, followed by superstructure and building envelope activities focusing on the east side of the site to allow for an early start to construction of the canal esplanade. Mechanical, electrical, and interior finish work will follow the superstructure activities; a final site finish stage will complete construction activities prior to occupancy.

PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS

In addition to the building construction on site, there would also be improvements to the infrastructure. The proposed project would separate the stormwater flow from the sanitary flow by installing new separate stormwater sewers in 1st and 2nd Streets, with new stormwater outfalls to the Gowanus Canal. These new stormwater sewers would be designed and constructed in accordance with DEP standards and approval.

PROPOSED WATERFRONT OPEN SPACE AND BULKHEAD IMPROVEMENTS

The proposed project would modify the existing infrastructure by installing a new steel sheet pile bulkhead for the entire length of the waterfront. To minimize extending the marine infrastructure into the water, the proposed new sheeting would be installed either in place or against the face of the existing timber sheathing. An archaeological field investigation would occur either in advance of or in concert with the bulkhead reconstruction and storm water outfall installation (in coordination with LPC), and would serve as mitigation for the significant adverse impact to the bulkhead. An Archaeological Testing Protocol in compliance with the LPC Guidelines for Archaeological Work in New York City guidelines would be prepared and implemented in coordination with LPC. In addition, as requested by SHPO, an Unanticipated Discovery Plan for both human and non-human remains would be prepared in consultation with SHPO and implemented during project-related construction at the site.

TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES

The proposed project will employ typical construction practices that have proven successful and have been found to be necessary to complete projects of this magnitude in a confined urban area. All deliveries, material removals, and hoist uses have to be tightly scheduled to maintain an orderly work area and to keep the construction on schedule and within budget. The applicant would designate a contact person for community relations throughout the construction period. This person would serve as the contact for the community to voice concerns about construction activities, and would be available to meet with the community to resolve concerns or problems.

Typical construction practices include:

• Remedial Action Plan(RAP)/Construction Health and Safety Plan (CHASP). To minimize the potential for impacts to the community and construction workers, all demolition, excavation, and construction work involving soil disturbance would be performed in accordance with a RAP/CHASP approved by DEP.

• Construction Equipment. Typical equipment used for demolition, excavation, and foundation work would include excavators, bulldozers, portable crushing equipment,

Page 23


backhoes, compaction equipment, tractors, jackhammers, and concrete pumping trucks. Other equipment that would be used include pile drivers, dump trucks and loaders, concrete trucks, and back hoes. Trucks would deliver concrete and other building materials, and remove excavated material as well as demolition and construction debris. The construction equipment likely to be used during erection of the superstructure would include compressors, cranes, concrete pumps, hoists, bending jigs, and welding machines.

• Deliveries and Access. Access to the construction sites would be controlled. Work areas would be fenced off to provide security protection, and limited access points for workers and trucks would be provided. Security guards and flaggers would be posted, and all persons and trucks would have to pass through security points. After work hours, the gates would be closed and locked. Material deliveries to the site would be controlled and scheduled. Unscheduled or haphazard deliveries would be minimized.

• Hours of Work. Construction activities for the proposed buildings would take place in accordance with New York City laws and regulations, which allow construction activities to take place between 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM. Typically, work would end at 3:30 PM, but could be extended until 6:00 PM. Extended workday activities would not include all construction workers on site, but only those involved in the specific task. Extended workdays would occur during foundation and superstructure tasks, and limited extended workdays could occur during other tasks over the course of construction. It is possible that weekend work would be required; it would require a permit from the New York City Department of Buildings (DOB) and, in certain instances, approval of a noise mitigation plan from DEP under the City’s Noise Code.

• Sidewalk and Lane Closures. Depending on the location and stage of construction at a particular time on the project site, construction activities would require temporary sidewalk and lane closures along Bond Street, Carroll Street, 1st Street or 2nd Street. Sidewalk and lane closures require NYCDOT permitting and compliance with measures to safeguard the public.

• Staging and Laydown Areas. During the early stages of construction, the laydown and staging areas would be accommodated on the unconstructed parcels. During construction of the proposed buildings’ superstructure, laydown areas would likely be on the curb lane of Bond Street, Carroll Street, 1st Street or 2nd Street.

• Rodent Control. Construction contracts would include provisions for a rodent control program in coordination with appropriate public agencies.

In sum, construction may at times be disruptive to nearby residential buildings during the construction period. However, since the proposed project will conform to all appropriate local and state regulations, there would be no significant adverse impacts from construction of the proposed project.

PUBLIC HEALTH

As per CEQR guidelines, a screening-level assessment was conducted to determine whether a public health analysis is warranted. The assessment determined that the proposed project would not results in significant adverse impacts related to air quality, hazardous materials, groundwater, solid waste management practices that could attract vermin, and noise. In addition, based on the technical analyses presented in earlier chapters of this EIS, the proposed project would not result in an exceedance of accepted federal, State, or local standards. The proposed project is not proposing any other actions that would result in significant public health concerns. Therefore, no further public health analysis is warranted and the proposed project would not result in significant adverse public health impacts.

Page 24

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K MITIGATION

The proposed project may result in significant adverse impacts in the areas of historic resources, air quality, and traffic. Possible mitigation for these impacts is discussed below.

HISTORIC RESOURCES

The proposed project includes the construction of a new steel sheet pile bulkhead along the eastern boundary of the project site. An anchoring system consisting of “deadmen” and steel tie rods would be installed, and would extend up to 40 feet landward of the bulkhead. The tie rods would run from the new sheeting to the deadmen approximately every eight feet for the length of the bulkhead. The installation of the tie rods would require that trenches between the bulkhead and the deadmen be excavated. The installation of the tie rods could require removal of portions of the existing cribwork sufficient to allow the steel tie rods to pass through the area. The proposed bulkhead rehabilitation design described above may require modification based on the requirements of DEC and/or ACOE.

Two new storm water outfalls would also be constructed through the existing bulkhead, one at the end of 1st Street and the other at the end of 2nd Street. The proposed bulkhead work and storm water outfall installation described above would adversely impact portions of the existing bulkhead at the project site.

To mitigate the significant adverse impact on the existing bulkhead under CEQR, an archaeological field investigation would be undertaken in coordination with the LPC that would document the extent and significant characteristics of the portion of the Gowanus Canal bulkhead on the project site. The goals of the investigation would be to determine the length and width of a single crib, document and/or sample fill contained within the timber cribwork, and to evaluate and document the bulkhead’s construction, including the joinery between adjacent cribs. This field investigation would occur either in advance of or in concert with the bulkhead reconstruction and storm water outfall installation. An Archaeological Testing Protocol in compliance with the LPC’s Guidelines for Archaeological Work in New York City (2002) would be prepared and implemented in coordination with LPC.

AIR QUALITY

An analysis was performed to determine if local odor conditions near the project site could impact the proposed project. Based on real-time sampling of odors at the project site, it was determined that at times, the concentration of hydrogen sulfide (H2S)—an indicator of potential odors—was above the 10 ppb nuisance-based threshold. In accordance with the CEQR Technical Manual, these levels would constitute a potential significant odor impact that could occur with respect to both future open space users and residents at the project site.

Given that local waterway and infrastructure is assumed to be the greatest contributor of H2S, to the ambient condition, this impact could potentially be reduced through the implementation of the City-proposed infrastructure projects for the area by 2013 (described above) which include:

• Rehabilitation of the Gowanus Canal Flushing Tunnel—This rehabilitation will increase the capacity for water intake from the East River to the canal from 154 mgd to 215 mgd. This would improve water quality and dissolved oxygen levels, enhance flow through and circulation, and reduce stagnation and organic matter concentrations in the canal waters which is one potential source of H2S.

• Reconstruction of the Gowanus Pump Station—This reconstruction would result in the expansion of the capacity of the Gowanus Pump Station through the installation of four new pumps and the redirection of sewage to a force main that currently runs along the

Page 25


inside of the Flushing Tunnel. Because the current force main is not operational, that flow is diverted to the Bond Street sewer, which could be another source of H2S through manholes and vents. Moreover, relieving the capacity of the Bond Street combined sewer reduced the potential for CSO discharges into the canal (the reconstruction of the Pump Station and replacement of the force main is projected to reduce the annual volume of CSO discharges to the canal by 34 percent) which in-turn reduces another potential source of H2S.

• Dredging—Dredging the upper 750 feet of the Gowanus Canal will eliminate exposed sediment mounds which has previously been identified as another potential source of H2S in the area.

As a result of the above-described proposed infrastructure improvements, it is possible that the identified odor impacts could potentially be reduced by 2013 (or upon completion of dredging). Since it is anticipated that these improvements would be implemented after the proposed project’s build year, the odor impacts would be considered unmitigated unavoidable adverse impacts until the completion of the improvements. To the extent that none of these measures are implemented or in the event that such measures are ineffective, H2S levels at the site could remain above 10ppb for an hourly average, thereby constituting an unmitigated unavoidable adverse impact of the proposed project.

TRAFFIC

Two of the intersections in the study area would experience significant adverse traffic impacts as a result of the proposed project. The sections below identify the mitigation needed at each location.

Proposed Mitigation Measures Measures proposed to mitigate the project-related traffic impacts would primarily involve retiming signal controls to increase green time for impacted movements and prohibition of curbside parking at one of the intersection approaches to provide an additional travel lane. The proposed mitigation measures are summarized in Table S-3 and are discussed below.

Table S-3Proposed Mitigation Measures

Intersections AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

3rd Avenue and Carroll Street

Prohibit parking on the south curb of eastbound Carroll Street approach for approximately 150 feet

to provide an additional moving lane of traffic.

Shift 3 seconds of green time from the northbound/southbound phase to the eastbound phase.

4th Avenue and Carroll Street

Shift 4 seconds of green time from the northbound/southbound phase to the eastbound

phase.

Shift 2 seconds of green time from the northbound/southbound phase to the eastbound phase.

3RD AVENUE AND CARROLL STREET

The impact at the eastbound approach of Carroll Street at 3rd Avenue during the weekday AM peak hour could be mitigated by prohibiting the curbside parking along the south side of the eastbound approach for approximately 150 feet during the AM peak hour. Currently, the curbside parking on the south side of Carroll Street is regulated by alternate side parking (street cleaning) regulations. With the proposed mitigation measure in place, no vehicular parking/standing would be allowed during the weekday AM peak hour (displacing approximately 7 parking spaces at the intersection approach) to provide an additional travel lane. The displaced parking spaces would

Page 26

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K increase the on-street parking utilization in the study area to approximately 98 percent during the early morning hours.

The impact at the eastbound approach of Carroll Street at 3rd Avenue during the weekday PM peak hour could be mitigated by shifting 3 seconds of green time from the northbound/southbound phase to the eastbound phase.

4TH AVENUE AND CARROLL STREET

The impact at the eastbound approach of Carroll Street at 4th Avenue during the weekday AM peak hour could be mitigated by shifting 4 seconds of green time from the northbound/ southbound phase to the eastbound phase.

The impact at the eastbound approach of Carroll Street at 4th Avenue during the weekday PM peak hour could be mitigated by shifting 2 seconds of green time from the northbound/ southbound phase to the eastbound phase.

It should be noted that all of the mitigation measures discussed above are subject to review and approval by NYCDOT.

ALTERNATIVES

Alternatives to the proposed project that were analyzed include the No Action Alternative, which assumes the project site would remain in its current condition and no zoning actions are approved; the As-of-Right Alternative, which assumes the project site is developed as-of-right with uses under the current M2-1 zoning district; and a Lesser Density Alternative, which considers the development of the project site at 2.7 FAR with market rate housing and without the inclusion of any affordable housing.

NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE

The No Action Alternative provides a baseline against which impacts of the proposed action may be compared. Under the No Action Alternative it is assumed that no discretionary actions would be necessary and that there would not be any changes to the project site.

Similar to the proposed project, the No Action Alternative would not result in any significant adverse impacts on: land use, zoning, and public policy; socioeconomics; community facilities; open space; shadows; urban design and visual resources; neighborhood character; hazardous materials; infrastructure; solid waste; energy; transit and pedestrians; noise; and public health. Unlike the proposed project, the No Action Alternative would not result in significant adverse impacts on historic resources, air quality, or traffic.

The No Action alternative would not result in some of the beneficial aspects of the proposed project. For example, it would fail to implement waterfront redevelopment, open space, and inclusionary housing objectives for the Gowanus Canal. It would not extend by two blocks the residential character of the adjacent Carroll Gardens neighborhood, provide the community facility space proposed by the project, provide new public views of the Carroll Street Bridge and Operator’s House, redevelop and stabilize the timber crib bulkhead; improve the quality of local groundwater and surface waters, or remediate the site for contaminated materials.

AS-OF-RIGHT ALTERNATIVE

Under this alternative, it is assumed that the existing uses on the project sites would be replaced with an As-of-Right Alternative warehouse/storage use (two buildings) covering the site and totaling about 295,000 zoning square feet. It would be up to 60 feet high and provide on-site parking.

Page 27

Final EIS Notice of Completion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K Similar to the proposed project, the As-of-Right Alternative would not result in any significant adverse impacts on: land use, zoning, and public policy; socioeconomics; community facilities; open space; shadows; historic resources; urban design and visual resources; neighborhood character; natural resources; hazardous materials; infrastructure; solid waste; energy; transit and pedestrians; noise; construction; and public health. The As-of-Right Alternative would generate approximately 43 and 13 more vehicle trips during the midday and PM peak hours than would the proposed project; however, it is anticipated that the mitigation measures proposed to address the impacts of the proposed project could similarly address any potential impacts of the As-of-Right Alternative. However, under the As-of-Right Alternative no such mitigation measures would be proposed since no CEQR review would be performed.

Under the As-of-Right Alternative, the project’s purpose and need and its objectives—including redevelopment of the waterfront with a new mix of housing and residential uses (including affordable housing) and open space—would not be achieved. Nor would the warehouse uses reinforce the existing patterns of residential development in the area or provide waterfront access for the community. It would not extend by two blocks the residential character of the adjacent Carroll Gardens neighborhood, provide the community facility space proposed by the project, open up new waterfront views of these historic resources, or improve the quality of local groundwater and surface waters. The construction health and safety plan required under the proposed project would not necessarily occur under this alternative.

LESSER DENSITY ALTERNATIVE

Under this alternative, it is assumed that the existing uses on the project site would be replaced with a market rate residential project that would provide approximately 320 housing units; no affordable housing would be provided. It is also assumed that a waterfront open space would be provided, as well as commercial and community facility uses similar to the proposed project.

Similar to the proposed project, the Lesser Density Alternative would not result in any significant adverse impacts on: land use, zoning, and public policy; socioeconomics; community facilities; open space; shadows; urban design and visual resources; neighborhood character; hazardous materials; natural resources; infrastructure; solid waste; energy; transit and pedestrians; noise; construction, and public health. With this alternative, there could be an adverse historic resources impact with respect to the historic Gowanus Canal bulkhead, but this alternative would also require a review by LPC under CEQR; therefore, mitigation would be required that would likely be similar to the proposed project. It is expected that the Lesser Density Alternative would result in significant adverse traffic impacts at the same locations as with the proposed project, and that mitigation measures similar to those recommended for the proposed project would be required to mitigate such impacts. Also, similar to the proposed project, the unmitigated, unavoidable adverse impact with respect to odors would occur under this alternative.

UNAVOIDABLE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS

An analysis was performed to determine if local odor conditions near the project site could impact the proposed project. Based on real-time sampling of odors at the project site, it was determined that at times, the concentration of H2S—an indicator of potential odors—was above the 10 ppb nuisance-based threshold. In accordance with the CEQR Technical Manual, these levels would constitute a potential significant odor impact that could occur with respect to both future open space users and residents at the project site.

Given that local waterway and infrastructure is assumed to be the greatest contributor of H2S, to the ambient condition, this impact could potentially be reduced or eliminated through the implementation of the City-proposed infrastructure projects for the area by 2013 which include:

Page 28


• Rehabilitation of the Gowanus Canal Flushing Tunnel—This rehabilitation will increase the capacity for water intake from the East River to the canal from 154 mgd to 215 mgd. This would improve water quality and dissolved oxygen levels, enhance flow through, circulation and reduce stagnation and organic matter concentrations in the canal waters which is one potential source of H2S.

• Reconstruction of the Gowanus Pump Station—This reconstruction would result in the expansion of the capacity of the Gowanus Pump Station through the installation of four new pumps and the redirection of sewage to a force main that currently runs along the inside of the Flushing Tunnel. Because the current force main is not operational, that flow is diverted to the Bond Street sewer, which could be another source of H2S through manholes and vents. Moreover, relieving the capacity of the Bond Street combined sewer reduced the potential for CSO discharges into the canal (the reconstruction of the Pump Station and replacement of the force main is projected to reduce the annual volume of CSO discharges to the canal by 34 percent) which in-turn reduces another potential source of H2S.

• Dredging—Dredging the upper 750 feet of the Gowanus Canal will eliminate exposed sediment mounds which has previously been identified as another potential source of H2S in the area.

As a result of the above-described proposed infrastructure improvements, it is possible that the identified odor impacts could potentially be reduced or eliminated by 2013 (or upon completion of dredging). Since it is anticipated that these improvements would be implemented after the proposed project’s build year, the odor impacts would be considered unmitigated unavoidable adverse impacts until the completion of the improvements. To the extent that none of these measures are implemented or in the event that such measures are ineffective, H2S levels at the site could remain above 10ppb for an hourly average, thereby constituting an unmitigated unavoidable adverse impact of the proposed project.

IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES

Under the proposed project, both natural and man-made resources would be expended in the construction and implementation of the proposed project. These resources include the building materials used during construction; energy in the form of gas and electricity consumed during construction; and the human effort (time and labor) required to develop, construct, and operate various elements of the proposed project. These are considered irretrievably committed because their reuse for some purpose other than the proposed project would be highly unlikely. Although the proposed project would result in a net overall increase in open spaces and a wider variety of land uses, the land use changes associated with the development of the proposed project may also be considered a resource loss.

These commitments of land resources and materials are weighed against the public purpose and benefits of the proposed development: to facilitate the development of underutilized parcels on a former waterfront industrial site along the Gowanus Canal with residential (including affordable housing), community facility and commercial uses, and to provide a publicly-accessible waterfront open space for the community.

GROWTH-INDUCING ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT

The goal of the proposed project and actions are to allow for the redevelopment of a former waterfront industrial site along the Gowanus Canal with residential and other uses including a publicly-accessible waterfront open space. While this development would support the City and State economies, it would not be expected to induce additional growth outside the project site.

Page 29

·Final EIS Notice.ofCompletion 363-365 Bond Street, CEQR No.08DCP033K

Much of the area surrounding the project site, including west of Bond Street and east of 4th A venue has been fully developed with residential development and commercial uses since the late 19th century (e.g., the Carroll Gardens and Park Slope neighborhoods). The intervening blocks between these long established residential neighborhoods along the Gowanus Canal have historically been developed with industrial uses and the level and type of development in this area is controlled by zoning which consists primarily of M2 and Ml zoning districts. The proposed project and related actions are specific to the two project blocks only. The remaining Gowanus area is also subject to the planning framework now being developed by the New York City Department of City Planning, which is a separate action examining future land use proposals for the area that would allow residential, commercial, the continuation of manufacturing, and open space uses along the canal. Also, given the increasing attraction of the area for new uses (including commercial, residential and hotel), there are a number of No Build projects that will add these new uses to the area through the year 2011.

The proposed project and actions would not significantly affect socioeconomic conditions in the study area. It would not add a residential population that would significantly increase the local population. In addition, given the trends that have been occurring in the area over the past two decades, the new residents would be similar in demographic composition to the current population and the added housing, in particular the affordable housing, would serve the current housing needs and demands in the area. With the proposed project, the added employment would be associated with the proposed residential and commercial uses, but would not significantly alter the local employment conditions. In addition, the proposed project can use existing infrastructure and proposes only infrastructure improvements that are site specific (e.g., new storm outfalls, bulkheads) and necessary'for site development.

For all the reasons cited above, it is concluded that the proposed actions would not result in any growth-inducing impacts. *

Robert Dobruskin, AICP, Director Environmental Assessment and Review Division New York City Department of City Planning

Page 30

I

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION II

290 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007-1866

October 2012 EPA update regarding the Lightstone Group proposal:

EPA has been asked to clarify how EPA’s anticipated dredgingcleanup would be affected by the Lightstone Group developmentproposal.

EPA’s conceptual approach to a coordinated cleanup includes:

1. addressing continuing upland sources before dredging reachesthat location;

2. where possible, upgrading bulkheads before dredging toreduce the cost and time needed to install temporarysheetpiling; and

3. reducing impacts of CSO discharges.

EPA believes that the Lightstone proposal would satisfy each ofthose goals if implemented:

1. EPA’s 2010 Remedial Investigation (RI) identified a minorarea of deep subsurface contamination at 400 Carroll Street. Lightstone has agreed to enter into an EPA administrativeorder to address this through a new engineered bulkheadsealed at the appropriate depth to isolate the contaminationfrom entering the Canal. Lightstone has also agreed toconduct additional EPA-recommended sampling and to addressany other areas of contamination under NYSDEC and NYCOERoversight.

2. The bulkhead would be engineered to EPA’s dredging depthspecifications, eliminating the need for temporarysheetpiling.

3. Lightstone’s proposal includes separating combined storm andsanitary discharges at and around the parcels. Lightstonehas agreed to consult and coordinate with EPA to ensure thatthere is a net CSO reduction and that separated stormwateris properly treated.

EPA supports coordinated cleanups of contaminated sites along theCanal to return land to productive use. EPA’s primary role insuch cleanups is to ensure that continuing contamination sourcesare addressed. If any part of a proposed project mightnegatively impact EPA’s cleanup, EPA would make that informationavailable and take appropriate steps. EPA does not have a rolein determining land use nor does EPA take a position on theappropriateness of a given redevelopment proposal.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION II

290 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007-1866

Regarding the Lightstone Group proposal at the formerToll Brothers property

EPA is periodically contacted by potential developers ofproperties near the Gowanus Canal having questions regardingEPA’s anticipated cleanup of the Canal, whether contamination ispresent on such properties and about the scope of Superfundliability.

Three parcels, 400 Carroll Street, 363 Bond Street and 365 BondStreet, commonly known as the former Toll Brothers property, werepreviously re-zoned as residential by New York City. An initialphase of sampling was done for Tolls Brothers’ proposed cleanupand redevelopment.

During EPA’s 2010 Remedial Investigation (RI), EPA installed aseries of groundwater monitoring wells at parcels along the canalwhere historic industrial activity could have resulted incontamination. EPA installed such wells at 400 Carroll Street and365 Bond Street, the former location of two fuel terminals. EPA’s wells identified an area of deep subsurface contaminationat 400 Carroll Street. At the time that EPA’s RI report wasreleased, EPA also recommended that additional sampling beconducted at the Toll Brothers parcels prior to redevelopment toensure a thorough cleanup.

In 2011, in consultation with EPA, the owners of 400 CarrollStreet did further sampling to delineate the area of concern toEPA. Sampling results to date indicate that although this area ofcontamination is small, localized, and at a depth (20+ feet belowthe water table) that would not impact future development of thesite, it could never the less impact the Canal sediment throughmigration.

The owners of 400 Carroll Street subsequently indicated to EPAthat they were prepared to address this minor hotspot through anew engineered bulkhead that is sealed at the appropriate depthand will isolate the contamination from entering the Canal andprevent Canal contamination from entering the property. Theowners also agreed to address under NYSDEC and NYCOER oversightthe remainder of the sites, including any other areas ofcontamination.

2

Recently the Lightstone Group indicated to EPA that they areprepared to conduct that work at 400 Carroll Street as well asany necessary additional sampling and cleanup work on the othertwo parcels under the oversight of EPA and NYSDEC. We haverecently reviewed and commented on a delineation work plan andwill continue to work with the Lightstone Group to properlydelineate and scope the remediation of any significantcontamination on the properties. The work would likely beconducted pursuant to an EPA administrative order which wouldprovide Superfund liability protection in addition to thatavailable under Superfund’s “Bone Fide Prospective Purchaser”provisions.

EPA supports the cleanup of contaminated sites along the Canalwhich would result in returning land to productive use. EPA’sprimary role in site cleanups along the Canal is to ensure thatcontinuing sources of contamination to the canal are addressed.

As with Lightstone’s proposal, it also beneficial to restore thedeteriorating bulkheads that permit contaminants to enter thecanal and separate the combined storm and sanitary dischargesfrom upland properties. EPA does not have a role in determiningland use for such properties nor does EPA take a position on theappropriateness of a given redevelopment proposal. State and cityagencies normally have the lead for determining the level ofcleanup necessary for a given land use project. EPA, however,routinely consults with those agencies when EPA identifies anypotential concerns.

Although EPA believes that cleanup work is necessary at theLightstone parcels and has been working cooperatively with theproject sponsor to accomplish this, EPA does not consider thesethree parcels to be significant sources compared to othercontaminated locations along the Canal. If implemented, this workwould control one of the smaller upland sources to the Canal andeliminate the time and expense of installing temporary sheetpiling to prevent bulkhead collapse along these parcels duringfuture remedial dredging.

September 2012


APPENDIX D

HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN

(HASP)

HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN

FOR

SITE INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN

365 Bond Street

Brooklyn, New York

Prepared For:

The Lightstone Group

460 Park Avenue, 13th Floor

New York, New York 10022

Prepared By:

Langan Engineering, Environmental, Surveying

and Landscape Architecture, D.P.C.

619 River Drive Center 1

Elmwood Park, New Jersey 07407 NJ Certificate of Authorization No: 24GA27996400

August 2012

Updated July 2013

100287501

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN

Client: The Lightstone Group

Project: PHASE II REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

Location: 365 Bond Street, Brooklyn, New York

Chemical Hazards: VOCs, SVOCs, Metals, PCBs

Prepared By: Langan Engineering, Environmental, Surveying and

Landscape Architecture, D.P.C.

Version: 1

Date: July 2013

Client Contact: Dennis Freed

Langan Project Manager (PM): Chris McMahon

Langan Health & Safety Coordinator (HSC): Tony Moffa, CHMM

Langan Site Supervisor Field Personnel

Langan Site Safety Officer (SSO): Field Personnel

LANGAN ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. (LANGAN) AND LANGAN

SUBCONTRACTORS DO NOT GUARANTEE THE HEALTH OR SAFETY OF ANY PERSON

ENTERING THIS SITE. DUE TO THE NATURE OF THIS SITE AND THE ACTIVITY OCCURRING

THEREON, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DISCOVER, EVALUATE, AND PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR

ALL POSSIBLE HAZARDS WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED. STRICT ADHERENCE TO THE

HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDELINES SET FORTH HEREIN WILL REDUCE, BUT NOT ELIMINATE,

THE POTENTIAL FOR INJURY AT THIS SITE. THE HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDELINES IN THIS

PLAN WERE PREPARED SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS SITE AND SHOULD NOT BE USED ON ANY

OTHER SITE WITHOUT PRIOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION BY A TRAINED HEALTH AND

SAFETY SPECIALIST.

APPROVALS

By signature, the personnel identified below hereby acknowledge that they have reviewed this

Environmental Health and Safely Plan (EHS Plan) and agree to comply with the requirements

contained therein as well as the applicable provisions of 29 CFR Parts 1910 and 1926. The

undersigned also acknowledge and accept that this EHS Plan is the project EHS Plan for the

site work described in the Phase II Investigation Work Plan (Work Plan). Furthermore, in

reviewing and accepting this EHS Plan, as currently written, the undersigned agree that to the

best of their knowledge, this EHS Plan adequately identifies the activities and hazards

associated with work at this site and describes the appropriate and necessary precautions and

protections for site workers required by the applicable OSHA statutes and regulations.

7/10/2013

LANGAN Project Manager - PM (Chris McMahon) Date

7/10/2013____

LANGAN Health and Safety Coordinator (Tony Moffa, CHMM) Date

LANGAN Site Supervisor Date

LANGAN Site Safety Officer ‟ SSO Date

TOC - i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Purpose and Policy ................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Site Descriptions .................................................................................................... 1

2.0 PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................... 2

2.1 Project Manager ..................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Site Supervisor/Site Safety Officer (SSO) ............................................................ 3 2.3 Health and Safety Coordinator (HSC) ................................................................... 4 2.4 Work Team ............................................................................................................. 5

3.0 HAZARDS ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 5

3.1 Chemical Exposure Hazards .................................................................................. 5 3.2 Biological Hazards ................................................................................................. 6

3.2.1 Blood-Borne Pathogens ............................................................................ 6

3.2.2 Animals ...................................................................................................... 6

3.2.3 Insects ........................................................................................................ 7

3.2.4 Wound Care ............................................................................................... 7

3.3 Physical Hazards .................................................................................................... 7 3.3.1 Temperature Extremes ............................................................................. 7

3.3.2 Noise and Air Resources .......................................................................... 8

3.3.3 Hand and Power Tools ............................................................................. 8

3.3.4 Slips, Trips, and Falls ................................................................................ 9

3.3.5 Fire and Explosion .................................................................................... 9

3.3.6 Material Handling ..................................................................................... 9

3.3.7 Drill Rig Operations ................................................................................ 10

3.3.8 Electrical Safety ...................................................................................... 11

3.3.9 Utilities .................................................................................................... 11

3.3.10 Vehicular Traffic ...................................................................................... 11

3.4 Task Hazard Analysis ........................................................................................... 11 3.4.1 Soil Borings Installations ....................................................................... 11

4.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE) ................................................................ 12

4.1 Levels of Protection ............................................................................................. 12 4.2 Respirator Fit-Test ............................................................................................... 14 4.3 Respirator Cartridge Change-Out Schedule ....................................................... 14

5.0 MONITORING PROGRAM ............................................................................................... 14

5.1 Community Air Monitoring Plan ......................................................................... 15 5.1.1 Vapor Emission Response Plan ............................................................. 16

5.1.2 Major Vapor Emission ............................................................................ 17

5.1.3 Major Vapor Emission Response Plan ................................................... 17

5.2 Monitoring Equipment Calibration and Maintenance ....................................... 17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(Continued)

TOC-ii

6.0 WORK ZONES and DECONTAMINATION ...................................................................... 18

6.1 Site Control .......................................................................................................... 18 6.2 Contamination Control ........................................................................................ 18

6.2.1 Personnel Decontamination Station ..................................................... 18

6.2.2 Minimization of Contact with Contaminants ....................................... 18

6.2.3 Personnel Decontamination Sequence ................................................. 19

6.2.4 Emergency Decontamination ................................................................. 19

6.2.5 Hand-Held Equipment Decontamination .............................................. 19

6.3 Communications .................................................................................................. 20

7.0 MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE .............................................................................................. 21

8.0 Medical Surveillance Program Requirements ............................................................... 21

9.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN ..................................................................................... 21

9.1 Responsibilities .................................................................................................... 21 9.1.1 Health and Safety Coordinator (HSC) .................................................... 21

9.1.2 Site Safety Officer (SSO) ........................................................................ 21

9.1.3 Emergency Coordinator ......................................................................... 22

9.1.4 Site Personnel ......................................................................................... 22

9.2 Communications .................................................................................................. 22 9.3 Local Emergency Support Units ......................................................................... 23 9.4 Pre-Emergency Planning ..................................................................................... 23 9.5 Emergency Medical Treatment ........................................................................... 24

(directions from site to hospital found on Figure 2) .......................................... 24

9.6 Emergency Site Evacuation Routes and Procedures ......................................... 24 9.7 Fire Prevention and Protection ........................................................................... 25

9.7.1 Fire Prevention ........................................................................................ 25

9.8 Significant Vapor Release ................................................................................... 25 9.9 Overt Chemical Exposure .................................................................................... 26 9.10 Decontamination During Medical Emergencies ................................................ 26 9.11 Incident Reporting ............................................................................................... 27 9.12 Adverse Weather Conditions .............................................................................. 27 9.13 Spill Control and Response ................................................................................. 28 9.14 Emergency Equipment ........................................................................................ 29 9.15 Restoration and Salvage ..................................................................................... 30

10.0 TRAINING ......................................................................................................................... 30

10.1 General Health and Safety Training ................................................................... 30 10.2 Annual Eight-Hour Refresher Training ............................................................... 30 10.3 Site-Specific Training........................................................................................... 30 10.4 Onsite Safety Briefings ........................................................................................ 31 10.5 First Aid and CPR ................................................................................................. 31 10.6 Hazard Communication ....................................................................................... 31

11.0 RECORDKEEPING ............................................................................................................ 32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(Continued)

TOC-iii

11.1 Field Change Authorization Request .................................................................. 32 11.2 Medical and Training Records ............................................................................. 32 11.3 Onsite Log ............................................................................................................ 32 11.4 Daily Safety Meetings (“Tailgate Talks”) ........................................................... 32 11.5 Exposure Records ................................................................................................ 32 11.6 Incident Reports ................................................................................................... 33 11.7 OSHA Form 300.................................................................................................... 33 11.8 Hazard Communication Program/MSDS ........................................................... 33 11.9 Work Permits ....................................................................................................... 33

12.0 FIELD PERSONNEL REVIEW ........................................................................................... 33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(Continued)

TOC-iv

TABLES

Table 1 List of Known or Suspected Contaminants

Table 2 Chemical Exposure Limits

Table 3 Hazard Analysis

Table 4 Instrumentation Action Levels

Table 5 Personnel Protection Equipment Summary

FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map

Figure 2 Emergency Hospital Route Map

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs)

Attachment B Field Change Authorization Request Form

Attachment C Accident/Incident Report Form

Attachment D Emergency Notification List

NJ Certificate of Authorization No. 24GA27996400

\\Langan.Com\Data\EP\Data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013-07 - OER Phase II RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Appendix D - HASP\HASP-365 Bond Street

(2013-07-10).Doc

1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Purpose and Policy

This Health and Safety Plan (HASP) has been developed to comply with the

regulations under Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

29 CFR 1910.120(b)(4), Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency

Response. The plan addresses activities associated with the Phase II Remedial

Investigation work to be conducted at 365 Bond Street, Brooklyn, New York

(see Figure 1). This EHS Plan establishes personnel protection standards and

mandatory safety practices and procedures. Additionally, it assigns

responsibilities, establishes standard operating procedures, and provides for

contingencies that may arise while operations are being conducted at known or

suspected hazardous waste sites.

The provisions of this HASP are mandatory for all on-site personnel. Although

for use only by Langan personnel, HASPs prepared by subcontractors must

conform to the requirements of this HASP at a minimum. All personnel who

engage in project activities must be familiar with this HASP, comply with its

requirements, and sign the Field Personnel Review Form (Section 12.0)

1.2 Site Descriptions

Please refer to the Remedial Investigation Workplan for the full job description

and scope of work. The following provides a general job description summary.

The subject site consists of the parcel identified as 365 Bond Street located in

Brooklyn, New York. The site contains a vacant low-rise industrial building that

occupies the block’s entire Bond street frontage and vacant lots used for truck

parking and storage adjacent to the canal.

Specifically, the proposed scope of work is designed to:

Identify the potential presence and extent of impacted soil vapor, soil,

and/or groundwater at the site;

Delineate contaminant(s) of concern that were identified in previous

environmental investigations; and,

2

Evaluate remediation options for any impacted soil vapor, soil, and/or

groundwater in accordance with NYSDEC and NYCOER regulations, if

required.

The scope of work for the proposed Subsurface Investigation includes the

following field tasks:

„ Project mobilization;

„ Completion of sub-slab soil vapor testing;

„ Completion of test borings and soil sampling; and,

„ Installation of groundwater monitoring wells and groundwater

sampling.

Following the drilling contractor obtaining the necessary permits, they will

mobilize the drill rig. Langan will oversee the completion of 7 soil borings to a

depth of up to 15-feet and subsequent monitoring well installation at 1 of these

locations. Additionally, Langan will oversee the completion of 2 sub-slab vapor

points and 3 deep soil vapor points.

2.0 PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES

This section specifies the Langan Project Organization.

2.1 Project Manager

Assumes total control over site activities. Reports to upper-level management.

Has authority to direct response operations.

Responsibilities:

Prepares and organizes the background review of the situation, the Phase II

Environmental Investigation Work Plan (Work Plan), the site HASP, and the

field team.

Obtains permission for site access and coordinates activities with

appropriate officials.

Ensures that the Work Plan is executed and on schedule.

Briefs the field team on their specific assignments.

3

Coordinates with the Site Safety Officer (SSO) to ensure that health and

safety requirements are met.

Prepares the final report and support files on the response activities.

Serves as the liaison with public officials.

2.2 Site Supervisor/Site Safety Officer (SSO)

Advises the Project Manager on all aspects of health and safety on site. Stops

work if any operation threatens worker or public health or safety. Is directly

responsible for the field team and the safety of site operations.

Responsibilities:

Manages field operations.

Executes the Work Plan and schedule.

Enforces safety procedures.

Coordinates with the SSO in determining protection level.

Enforces site control.

Documents field activities and sample collection.

Serves as a liaison with public officials.

Ensures that all necessary Health and Safety equipment is available on site

and is functional.

Periodically inspects protective clothing and equipment.

Conducts all on-site air monitoring activities and modifies PPE requirements

based on action levels shown in Table 4.

Ensures that protective clothing and equipment are properly stored and

maintained.

Controls entry and exit at the Access Control points.

Coordinates health and safety program activities with the HSC.

Confirms each team member's suitability for work based on a physician's

recommendation.

Monitors the work parties for signs of stress, such as cold exposure, heat

stress, and fatigue.

Implements all elements of this EHS Plan.

4

Conducts periodic inspections to determine if this EHS Plan is being

followed.

Enforces the "buddy" system.

Knows emergency procedures, evacuation routes, and the telephone

numbers of the ambulance, local hospital, poison control center, fire

department, and police department.

Notifies, when necessary, local public emergency officials.

Coordinates emergency medical care.

Sets up decontamination lines and the decontamination solutions

appropriate for the type of chemical contamination on the site.

Controls the decontamination of all equipment, personnel, and samples from

the contaminated areas.

Assures proper disposal of contaminated clothing and materials.

Ensures that all required equipment is available.

Advises medical personnel of potential exposures and consequences.

Notifies emergency response personnel by telephone or radio in the event

of an emergency.

Assist in the preparation of all Root Cause Investigation Reports/

Preventative Action Plans for any incidents and or Close Calls.

2.3 Health and Safety Coordinator (HSC)

Responsibilities:

Assists SSO with development of the HASP, updating HASP as dictated by

changing conditions, jobsite inspection results, etc.

Assists SSO in conducting Jobsite Safety Inspections and assists with the

correction of shortcomings found.

Coordinates the activities of the Contract Medical Advisor staff in their EHS

Plan responsibilities.

Ensures training requirements are satisfied in a timely manner.

Ensures medical evaluations of Langan personnel are current.

5

Maintains all records on personnel (medical evaluation results, training and

certifications, accident investigation results, etc.).

Prepare any Root Cause Investigation Reports/Preventative Action Plans for

any incidents and or Close Calls.

2.4 Work Team

Vacuum truck operators, drillers, samplers, surveyors, etc. The work party must

consist of at least two people.

Responsibilities:

Safely completes the on-site tasks required to fulfill the Work Plan.

Complies with this HASP.

Notifies SSO of suspected unsafe conditions.

Report any unsafe or potentially hazardous conditions to the SSO.

Maintain knowledge of the information, instructions and emergency

response actions contained in this HASP.

Comply with roles, regulations and procedures as set forth in this HASP and

any revisions.

Prevent admittance to work sites by unauthorized personnel.

Inspect all tools and equipment, including PPE, daily prior to use.

3.0 HAZARDS ANALYSIS

This section presents all assessment of the chemical, biological, and physical hazards

that may be encountered during the tasks specified under this HASP (Section 3). A

detailed list of types of potential contaminants of concerns Langan anticipates to

encounter at different locations during the intrusive investigation is listed in Table 1 of

this HASP.

3.1 Chemical Exposure Hazards

Potential contaminants that may be encountered while conducting site

investigation activities include VOCs, SVOCs, metals, and PCBs and historic fill.

Some relevant properties of these contaminants are shown in Table 1.

6

On-site personnel will make efforts to avoid activities that could generate

potentially contaminated dust, and work upwind of potentially contaminated soils

and ground water during investigation activities. In addition to the site’s

suspected contaminants, materials used in the site investigation process itself

may potentially be hazardous to human health if they are not used properly.

Material Safety Data Sheets for materials that will be brought or used on site and

the known or suspected site contaminants are included in Attachment A.

3.2 Biological Hazards

During the course of the project, there is a potential for workers to come into

contact with biological hazards such as animals, insects, and blood-borne

pathogens.

3.2.1 Blood-Borne Pathogens

During the course of the project, there is a potential for workers to come

into contact with biological hazards such as animals and insects. As the

potential for exposure to blood borne pathogens during the investigation

is anticipated to be low, a Blood-borne Pathogen Exposure Plan (BBPEP)

is not required. A BBPEP will be prepared if site operation requires its

implementation. Regardless, a first aid kit will be available on site at all

times during work

3.2.2 Animals

During site operations, animals such as dogs, cats, pigeons, mice, and

rats may be encountered. Workers shall use discretion and avoid all

contact with animals. Bites and scratches from dogs and cats can be

painful and if the animal is rabid, the potential for contracting rabies

exists. Contact with rat and mice droppings may lead to contracting

hantavirus. Inhalation of dried pigeon droppings may lead to psittacosis.

Cryptococcosis and histoplasmosis are also diseases associated with

exposure to dried bird droppings but these are less likely to occur in this

occupational setting.

7

3.2.3 Insects

Insects, including bees, wasps, hornets, mosquitoes, spiders, and ticks

may be present at the site. Some individuals may have a severe allergic

reaction to an insect bite or sting that can result in a life threatening

condition. In addition, mosquito bites may lead to St. Louis encephalitis

or West Nile encephalitis.

3.2.4 Wound Care

A source of occupational exposure may occur when an employee gives

First Aid and or CPR to an individual who had infectious blood. The

occupational exposure occurs when there is the possibility for an

employee’s eyes, mucous membranes, non-intact skin (i.e., cut and

abraded skin) to come into contact with potentially infectious materials

from another employee. If an accident were to occur where First Aid

would need to be administered, the person administering the First Aid

will presume that any wounds and materials used are contaminated with

BBP and should wear the appropriate PPE to prevent contact with these

materials. Additionally, should the use of First Aid materials and or

clothing that was potentially contaminated with BBP be encountered

these materials should be property containerized and transported to the

nearest hospital for proper disposal.

3.3 Physical Hazards

3.3.1 Temperature Extremes

Hot Temperatures

Heat stress is a significant potential hazard, which is greatly exacerbated

with the use of PPE, in hot environments. The potential hazards of

working in hot environments include dehydration, cramps, heat rash, heat

exhaustion, and heat stroke. If onsite workers exhibit the signs of heat

exhaustion or heat stroke, they should seek immediate medical attention.

Cold Temperatures

Workers may be exposed to the hazard of working in a cold environment.

Potential hazards in cold environments include frostbite, trench foot or

8

immersion foot, hypothermia, as well as slippery surfaces, brittle

equipment, poor judgment, and unauthorized procedural changes. In

order to prevent frostbite, hypothermia, trench foot and immersion foot,

the workers are responsible for dressing warmly in layers with thick

socks, gloves, and appropriate head and face gear. Upon the onset of

discomfort due to the cold, onsite workers should take regular five to ten

minute breaks to warm up inside nearby buildings and to drink warm

fluids. Please note that the NYCDEP statute prohibits idling an engine for

more than three minutes (one-minute if adjacent to a school). This statue

includes the use of a vehicle for the purpose of warming up employees.

As such, all contractors and employees shall identify a place to warm up

in advance. If discomfort continues and the onsite workers start to

exhibit the signs of frostbite, hypothermia, trench foot or immersion foot,

they should seek immediate medical attention.

3.3.2 Noise and Air Resources

Noise is a potential hazard associated with the operation of heavy

equipment, power tools, pumps and generators. Hearing protection is

required for noise levels of greater than 85 dBA.

The New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP)

has initiated construction noise rules effective 1 July 2007. Contractors

employing construction equipment such as vacuum excavators, drill rigs,

and jackhammers, are required by the rules to have notarized

Construction Noise Mitigation Plans. Noise mitigation measures may

include mufflers, etc. Boring activities will occur during daytime hours

only to minimize noise disturbance to the community. In addition, no

vehicles will idle for more than three minutes (one-minute adjacent to a

school) when not in use for powering a tool.

3.3.3 Hand and Power Tools

In order to complete the various tasks for the project, personnel will

utilize hand and power tools. The use of hand and power tools can

present a variety of hazards, including physical harm from being struck by

flying objects, being cut or struck by the tool, fire, and electrocution.

Proper personal protective equipment shall be worn while utilizing hand

9

and power tools. Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters (GFCIs) are required

for all portable electric tools.

3.3.4 Slips, Trips, and Falls

Working in and around the site will pose slip, trip and fall hazards due to

equipment, piping, slippery surfaces that may be oil covered, or from

surfaces that are wet from rain or ice. Potential adverse health effects

include falling to the ground and becoming injured or twisting an ankle.

Good housekeeping at the site must be maintained at all times.

3.3.5 Fire and Explosion

Prior to starting all excavation and boring work, a review of appropriate

New York City maps will be conducted to identify potential hazards. The

possibility of encountering fire and explosion hazards exists from under-

ground utilities and gases; therefore, all excavation/boring equipment

must be grounded.

3.3.6 Material Handling

Manual lifting of heavy objects may be required. Failure to follow proper

lifting techniques can result in back injuries and strains. Back injuries are

a serious concern as they are the most common workplace injury, often

resulting in lost or restricted work time, and long treatment and recovery

periods.

Whenever possible, heavy objects must be lifted and moved by

mechanical devices rather than by manual effort. The mechanical

devices will be appropriate for the lifting or moving task and will be

operated only by trained and authorized personnel. Objects that require

special handling or rigging will only be moved under the guidance of a

person who has been specifically trained to move such objects, such as a

Master Rigger or equivalent. Lifting devices, including equipment, slings,

ropes, chains, and straps, will be inspected, certified, and labeled to

confirm their weight capacities. Defective equipment will be taken out of

service immediately and repaired or destroyed.

10

The wheels of any trucks being loaded or unloaded, and/or parked on an

incline, will be chocked to prevent movement. If applicable, outriggers

will be extended on a flat, firm surface during operation. The lift and

swing path of a crane/equipment will be watched and maintained clear of

obstructions. Personnel will not pass under a raised load, nor will a

suspended load be left unattended. Personnel will not be carried on

lifting equipment, unless it is specifically designed to carry passengers.

All reciprocating, rotating, or other moving parts will be guarded at all

times. Accessible fire extinguishers will be made available in all

mechanical lifting devices. All material must be stored in tiers, racked,

blocked, or otherwise secure to prevent sliding, falling, or collapse. All

loads/material will be verified to be secure before transportation.

3.3.7 Drill Rig Operations

In order to complete soil borings, a direct-push drill rig with hollow stem

auger capability will be used. Working with and near this equipment

poses many potential hazards, including being struck by or against, or

pinched/caught by moving parts. These hazards can result in serious

physical harm. Other hazards include electrocution and explosion due to

encountering overhead or underground utilities.

Drill rigs for hollow stem auger drilling and other machinery with exposed

moving parts must be equipped with an operational emergency stop

device. Drillers and other field personnel must be aware of the location

of this device. This device must be tested prior to job initiation and

periodically thereafter. The driller and helper shall not simultaneously

handle augers unless there is a standby person to activate the

emergency switch. Only equipment that has been approved by the

manufacturer may be used in conjunction with site equipment and

specifically to attach sections of drilling tools together. Pins that protrude

excessively from augers shall not be allowed.

The driller must never leave the controls while the tools are rotating

unless all personnel are kept clear of rotating equipment. A remote

sampling device must be used to sample drill cuttings if the tools are

rotating or if the tools are readily capable of rotating. Samplers must not

11

reach into or near the rotating equipment. Drillers, helpers, and other

field personnel must secure all loose clothing when in the vicinity of

drilling operations. No person shall climb the drill mast while tools are

rotating or without the use of ANSI-approved fall protection (approved

belts, lanyards and a fall protection slide rail) or portable ladder that

meets the requirement of the OSHA standard.

3.3.8 Electrical Safety

Although not anticipated, personnel may utilize hand and power tools.

The use of hand and power tools can present a variety of hazards,

including physical harm from being struck by flying objects, being cut or

struck by the tool, fire, and electrocution. Ground Fault Circuit

Interrupters (GFCIs) are required for all portable electric tools.

Construction vehicles and equipment will have grounds mounted to

them.

3.3.9 Utilities

Prior to the start of any intrusive work, the location of above-ground and

underground utilities and other structures will be completed by the

contractor/subcontractor responsible for completing construction activities.

3.3.10 Vehicular Traffic

Portions of site activities (load in and load out) will be conducted in the

street so vehicular and pedestrian traffic will be present. Appropriate

precautions to protect to works and civilians should be used including the

use of cones and traffic vests as appropriate.

3.4 Task Hazard Analysis

3.4.1 Soil Borings Installations

Special attention shall be given to establishing the location of any

underground utilities prior to boring or drilling. Prior to beginning the site

investigation work, the N.Y. One Call Center will be contacted by the

boring/drilling contractor for utility mark-outs. Pressure safety valves and

hose whip prevention devices will be installed and operational on any air

12

compressors, hoses, and their tools to be used on site. Additionally, all

appropriate and current FDNY Certificates of Fitness (C of F) cards must

be on site for those workers using equipment where C of Fs are

required.

Chemical exposure may also occur as excavation cuttings are handled,

and samples are collected. Activities will be conducted in Level D, but

personnel should be prepared to upgrade to Level C, as appropriate,

based on field screening criteria.

If evidence of historic contamination is encountered during test borings

other than what is part of the intended investigation, installation or

drilling, work will be stopped and emergency contacts listed in

Attachment D of this HASP will be immediately notified.

4.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE)

4.1 Levels of Protection

PPE must protect workers from the specific hazards they are likely to encounter

on site. Selection of the appropriate PPE must take into consideration:

(1) identification of the hazards or suspected hazards; (2) potential exposure

routes; and, (3) the performance of the PPE construction (materials and seams)

in providing a barrier to these hazards. Based on anticipated site conditions and

the proposed work activities to be performed at the site, Level D Protection will

be used. The upgrading/downgrading of these levels of protection will be based

on continuous air monitoring results as described in Section 5.0. The decision to

modify standard PPE will be made by the SSO after conferring with the Project

Manager. The levels of protection are described below.

Level D Protection

a. Safety glasses w/ sideshields or chemical splash goggles

b. Safety boots/shoes (toe-protected)

c. Hard hat

d. Long sleeve work shirt and work pants

e. Nitrile gloves

f. Hearing protection (as needed)

g. Reflective traffic vest

13

Level D Protection (Modified)

a. Safety glasses w/ sideshields or chemical splash goggles

b. Safety boots/shoes (toe-protected)

c. Disposable chemical-resistant boot covers

d. Coveralls (polycoated Tyvek or equivalent to be worn when contact with

wet contaminated soil, groundwater, or non-aqueous phase liquids is

anticipated)

e. Hard hat

f. Long sleeve work shirt and work pants

g. Nitrile gloves

h. Hearing protection (as needed)

i. Reflective traffic vest

Level C Protection

a. Full face-piece, air-purifying, cartridge*-equipped, NIOSH-approved

respirator [*combo cartridge P100/OV/CL/HC/SD/CD/HS (escape)]

b. Inner (latex) and outer (nitrile) chemical-resistant glove

c. Chemical-resistant safety boots/shoes (toe-protected)

d. Disposable chemical-resistant boot covers

e. Hard hat

f. Long sleeve work shirt and work pants

g. Coveralls (Tyvek or equivalent, poly-coated Tyvek will be worn when

contact, or anticipated contact with wet contaminated soils, ground

water, and/or non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPL) is anticipated )

h. Hearing protection (as needed)

i. Reflective traffic vest

The action levels used in determining the necessary levels of respiratory

protection and upgrading to Level C, Level B, or Level A are summarized

in Table 2. The written Respiratory Protection Program is maintained by

the HSC in Langan’s Doylestown, Pennsylvania office. The monitoring

procedures and equipment are outlined in Section 5.0. Prior to the start

of any intrusive work, the location of above-ground and underground

utilities and other structures will be completed by the contractor/

subcontractor responsible for completing construction activities.

14

4.2 Respirator Fit-Test

All Langan employees and subcontractors performing site work who could be

exposed to hazardous substances at the work site are required to be in

possession of a full face-piece, air-purifying respirator and have been

successfully quantitative fit-tested within the past year. Quantitative fit-test

records are maintained by the HSC.

4.3 Respirator Cartridge Change-Out Schedule

Respiratory protection is required to be worn when certain action levels (Table 2)

are reached. A respirator cartridge change-out schedule has been developed in

order to comply with 29 CFR 1910.134. The respirator cartridge change-out

schedule for this project is as follows:

Cartridges shall be removed and disposed of at the end of each shift, when

cartridges become wet or wearer experiences breakthrough, whichever

occurs first.

If the humidity exceeds 85%, then cartridges shall be removed and

disposed of after 4 hours of use.

Respirators shall not be stored at the end of the shift with contaminated

cartridges left on. Cartridges shall not be worn on the second day, no matter

how short the time period was the previous day they were used.

5.0 MONITORING PROGRAM

The following sections contain information describing the types, frequency and location

of real-time, integrated, and other monitoring.

Air monitoring results are partially used to provide data to determine when exclusion

zones (EZs) need to be established and when certain levels of PPE are required. For all

instruments, there are specific action level criteria which are used in making field health

and safety determinations. Other data, such as the visible presence of contamination or

the steady state nature of air contaminant concentrations, are also used in making field

health and safety decisions. Therefore, the SSO or Site Supervisor may establish an EZ

or require a person to wear a respirator even though atmospheric air contaminant

concentrations are below established HASP action levels.

15

5.1 Community Air Monitoring Plan

Community air monitoring will be conducted in compliance with the Community

Air Monitoring Plan (CAMP) outlined below.

Monitoring for total organic vapors (TOVs) and particulate will be conducted

during all ground intrusive activities. Upwind concentrations will be measured at

the start of each workday to establish background concentrations. TOVs and

particulates will be monitored within the work zone and at the downwind

perimeter of the Site with a PID equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp and a DusTrak or

DataRAM, respectively. Monitoring equipment will be capable of calculating 15-

minute running average concentrations.

The following actions will be taken based on TOV levels measured:

If total organic vapor levels exceed 5 ppm above background for the 15-

minute average at the perimeter, work activities will be temporarily halted

and monitoring continued. If levels readily decrease (per instantaneous

readings) below 5 ppm above background, work activities will resume

with continued monitoring.

If total organic vapor levels at the downwind perimeter of the Site persist

at levels in excess of 5 ppm above background but less than 25 ppm,

work activities will be halted, the source of vapors identified, corrective

actions taken to abate emissions, and monitoring continued. After these

steps work activities will resume provided that the total organic vapor at

the perimeter of the Site is below 5 ppm above background for the 15-

minute average.

If the total organic vapor level is above 25 ppm at the perimeter of the

Site, activities will be shutdown.

The following actions will be taken based on particulate concentrations

measured:

If the downwind particulate level is 100 micrograms per cubic meter

(ug/m3) greater than background (upwind perimeter) for the 15-minute

period or if airborne dust is observed leaving the work area, then dust

suppression techniques will be employed. Work will continue with dust

suppression techniques provided that downwind particulate levels do not

16

exceed 150 ug/m3 above the upwind level and provided that no visible

dust is migrating from the work area.

If, after implementation of dust suppression techniques, downwind

particulate levels are greater than 150 ug/m3 above the background level,

work will be stopped and a re-evaluation of activities initiated. Work will

resume provided that dust suppression measures and other controls are

successful in reducing the downwind particulate concentration to within

150 ug/m3 of the upwind level and in preventing visible dust migration.

In order to minimize the generation of dust, water will be sprayed on

soils to be excavated, as needed. Water will also be sprayed on any

areas of the Site where dust could be generated. A suitable dust control

material, such as calcium chloride, will be used, as necessary, in high-

traffic areas in order to minimize dust caused by vehicular traffic.

Action levels are also provided in Table 4.

5.1.1 Vapor Emission Response Plan

If the ambient air concentration of organic vapors exceeds 5 ppm above

background at the perimeter of the Site, intrusive activities will be halted

or vapor suppression controls will be employed, and monitoring

continued. When work shut-down occurs, downwind air monitoring as

directed by the Field Safety Officer will be implemented to ensure that

vapor emission does not impact the nearest residential or commercial

structure at levels exceeding those specified in the Major Vapor Emission

section.

If the organic vapor level decreases below 5 ppm above background,

intrusive activity can resume, provided:

o The organic vapor level at the downwind perimeter of the Site is

below 1 ppm over background, and

o More frequent intervals of monitoring, as directed by the Site

Health and Safety Officer, are conducted.

17

5.1.2 Major Vapor Emission

If any organic levels greater than 5 ppm over background are identified at

the downwind perimeter of the Site, all work activities must be halted or

odor controls must be implemented.

If, following the cessation of the work activities, or as the result of an

emergency, organic levels persist above 5 ppm above background at the

downwind perimeter of the Site, then the air quality must be monitored

within 20 feet of the perimeter of the nearest residential or commercial

structure (20 Foot Zone).

If either of the following criteria is exceeded in the 20 Foot Zone, then

the Major Vapor Emission Response Plan shall automatically be

implemented.

o Sustained organic vapor levels approaching 5 ppm above

background for a period of more than 30 minutes, or

o Organic vapor levels greater than 5 ppm above background for

any time period.

5.1.3 Major Vapor Emission Response Plan

Upon activation, the following activities will be undertaken:

1. The local police authorities will immediately be contacted by the

Site Health and Safety Officer and advised of the situation;

2. Frequent air monitoring will be conducted at 30-minute intervals

within the 20 Foot Zone. If two successive readings below action

levels are measured, air monitoring may be halted or modified by

the Site Health and Safety Officer.

All Emergency contacts will go into effect as appropriate.

5.2 Monitoring Equipment Calibration and Maintenance

Instrument calibration shall be documented and included in a dedicated safety

and health logbook or on separate calibration pages of the field book. All

instruments shall be calibrated before each shift. Calibration checks may be used

18

during the day to confirm instrument accuracy. Duplicate readings may be taken

to confirm individual instrument response.

6.0 WORK ZONES AND DECONTAMINATION

6.1 Site Control

Work zones are intended to control the potential spread of contamination

throughout the site and to assure that only authorized individuals are permitted

into potentially hazardous areas.

Any person working in an area where the potential for exposure to site

contaminants exists will only be allowed access after providing the SSO with

proper training and medical documentation.

Exclusion Zone (EZ) - All activities which may involve exposure to site

contaminants, hazardous materials and/or conditions should be considered an

EZ. Decontamination of field equipment will also be conducted in the

Contaminant Reduction Zone (CRZ) which will be located on the perimeter of the

EZ. The EZ and the CRZ will be clearly delineated by cones, tapes or other

means. The SSO/Site Supervisor may establish more than one EZ where

different levels of protection may be employed or different hazards exist. The

size of the EZ shall be determined by the SSO/Site Supervisor allowing adequate

space for the activity to be completed, field members and emergency

equipment.

6.2 Contamination Control

6.2.1 Personnel Decontamination Station

Personal hygiene, coupled with diligent decontamination, will significantly

reduce the potential for exposure.

6.2.2 Minimization of Contact with Contaminants

During completion of all site activities, personnel should attempt to

minimize the chance of contact with contaminated materials. This

involves a conscientious effort to keep "clean" during site activities. All

personnel should minimize kneeling, splash generation, and other

19

physical contact with contamination as PPE is intended to minimize

accidental contact. This may ultimately minimize the degree of

decontamination required and the generation of waste materials from

site operations.

Field procedures will be developed to control over spray and runoff and

to ensure that unprotected personnel working nearby are not affected.

6.2.3 Personnel Decontamination Sequence

Decontamination will be performed by removing all PPE used in EZ and

placing it in drums/trash cans at the CRZ. Baby wipes shall be available

for wiping hands and face.

6.2.4 Emergency Decontamination

If circumstances dictate that contaminated clothing cannot be readily

removed, then remove gross contamination and wrap injured personnel

with clean garments/blankets to avoid contaminating other personnel or

transporting equipment.

If the injured person can be moved, he/she will be decontaminated by

site personnel as described above before emergency responders handle

the victim. If the person cannot be moved because of the extent of the

injury (a back or neck injury), provisions shall be made to ensure that

emergency response personnel will be able to respond to the victim

without being exposed to potentially hazardous atmospheric conditions.

If the potential for inhalation hazards exist, such as with open excavation,

this area will be covered with polyethylene sheeting to eliminate any

potential inhalation hazards. All emergency personnel are to be

immediately informed of the injured person's condition, potential

contaminants, and provided with all pertinent data.

6.2.5 Hand-Held Equipment Decontamination

Hand-held equipment includes all monitoring instruments as stated

earlier, samples, hand tools, and notebooks. The hand-held equipment is

dropped at the first decontamination station to be decontaminated by

20

one of the decontamination team members. These items must be

decontaminated or discarded as waste prior to removal from the CRZ.

To aid in decontamination, monitoring instruments can be sealed in

plastic bags or wrapped in polyethylene. This will also protect the

instruments against contaminants. The instruments will be wiped clean

using wipes or paper towels if contamination is visually evident. Sampling

equipment, hand tools, etc. will be cleaned with non-phosphorous soap

to remove any potentially contaminated soil, and rinsed with deionized

water. All decontamination fluids will be containerized and stored on-site

pending waste characterization sampling and appropriate off-site

disposal.

6.3 Communications

The following communications equipment will be utilized as appropriate.

Telephones - A cellular telephone will be located with the SSO/Site Supervisor

for communication with the HSC and emergency support services/facilities.

Hand Signals - Hand signals shall be used by field teams, along with the

buddy system. The entire field team shall know them before operations

commence and their use covered during site-specific training. Typical hand

signals are the following:

Signal Meaning

Hand gripping throat Out of air, can’t breathe

Grip on partner’s wrist or

placement of both hands

around partner’s waist

Leave area immediately, no debate

Hands on top of head Need assistance

Thumbs up Okay, I’m all right, I understand

Thumbs down No, negative

21

7.0 MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE

All contractor and subcontractor personnel performing site field work where potential

exposure to contaminants exists are required to have passed a complete medical

surveillance physical examination in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120(f).

8.0 MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

A physician's medical clearance for work will be confirmed by the SSO/Site Supervisor

before an employee can work in the EZ. The examination will be completed annually at

a minimum. Additional medical testing may be required by the HSC if, a.) an over-

exposure or accident occurs, b.) an employee exhibits symptoms of exposure, or

c.) other site conditions warrant further medical surveillance.

9.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN

This section establishes procedures and provides information for use during a project

emergency. Emergencies happen unexpectedly and quickly, and require an immediate

response; therefore, contingency planning and advanced training of staff is essential.

Specific elements of emergency support procedures that are addressed in the following

subsections include communications, local emergency support units, preparation for

medical emergencies, first aid for injuries incurred on site, record keeping, and

emergency site evacuation procedures.

9.1 Responsibilities

9.1.1 Health and Safety Coordinator (HSC)

The HSC oversees and approves the Emergency Response/Contingency

Plan and performs audits to determine that the plan is in effect and that

all pre-emergency requirements are met. The HSC will be notified of all

incidents, injuries, near misses, OSHA recordable incidents, fires, spills,

releases or equipment damage. The HSC acts as a liaison to applicable

regulatory agencies.

9.1.2 Site Safety Officer (SSO)

The SSO is responsible for ensuring that all personnel are evacuated

safely and that machinery and processes are shut down or stabilized in

22

the event of a stop work order or evacuation. The SSO is responsible for

ensuring the HSC are notified of all incidents, all injuries, near misses,

fires, spills, releases or equipment damage. The SSO is required to

immediately notify the HSC of any fatalities or catastrophes (three or

more workers injured and hospitalized) so that the HSC can notify OSHA

within the required time frame.

9.1.3 Emergency Coordinator

The Emergency Coordinator is normally the SSO.

The Emergency Coordinator shall make contact with Local Emergency

Response personnel prior to beginning work on site. In these contacts,

the Emergency Coordinator will inform interested parties about the

nature and duration of work expected on the site and the type of

contaminants and possible health or safety effects of emergencies

involving these contaminants. The Emergency Coordinator shall locate

emergency phone numbers and identify hospital routes prior to beginning

work on the sites. The Emergency Coordinator shall make necessary

arrangements to be prepared for any emergencies that could occur.

The Emergency Coordinator shall implement the Emergency Response/

Contingency Plan whenever conditions resulting from the Site

Investigation warrant such action.

9.1.4 Site Personnel

Project site personnel are responsible for knowing the Emergency

Response/Contingency Plan and the procedures contained herein.

Personnel are expected to notify the Emergency Coordinator of situations

that could constitute a site emergency. Project site personnel, including

all subcontractors will be trained in the Emergency Response/

Contingency Plan.

9.2 Communications

Once an emergency situation has been stabilized or as soon as practically

possible, the SSO will contact the Langan project manager of any emergency

situation.

23

9.3 Local Emergency Support Units

In order to be able to deal with any emergency that might occur during

investigative activities at the site, Attachment D will be available in the field

vehicles and provided to all personnel conducting work within the EZ.

Figure 2 shows the hospital route map. Outside emergency number 911 and

local ambulance should be relied on for response to medical emergencies and

transport to emergency rooms. Due to traffic congestion that is prevalent in the

New York metropolitan area, alternate hospital routes will need to be

considered. The Emergency Coordinator will determine the appropriate route

based on time of day and traffic patterns. Changes in the referenced primary

facilities shall be documented with the HASP Field Change Authorization

Request Form (Attachment B).

The Emergency Phone Numbers listed are preliminary. Upon mobilization, the

SSO shall verify all numbers and document the changes in the Site Health and

Safety Logbook. Any changes shall also be documented with the HASP Field

Change Authorization Request Form.

Hospital route maps will be provided to all field personnel.

9.4 Pre-Emergency Planning

Langan will communicate directly with administrative personnel from the

emergency room at the hospital in order to determine whether the hospital has

the facilities and personnel needed to treat cases of trauma resulting from any of

the contaminants expected to be found on the site. Instructions for finding the

hospital will be posted conspicuously in the site office and in each site vehicle.

Before fieldwork on the site commences, each person who will be working

there or observing the operations will complete a medical data sheet. These data

sheets will be filled out during the initial site safety training meeting and will be

kept on the site.

In the event of an incident where a team member becomes exposed or suffers

from an acute symptom of exposure to site materials and has to be taken to a

hospital, a copy of his/her medical data sheet will be presented to the attending

physician.

24

9.5 Emergency Medical Treatment

The procedures and rules in this HASP are designed to prevent employee injury.

However, should an injury occur, no matter how slight, it will be reported to the

SSO on site immediately. First-aid equipment will be available on site at the

following locations:

First Aid Kit: Vehicles

Emergency Eye Wash: Vehicles

During the site safety briefing, project personnel will be informed of the location

of the first aid station(s) that has been set up. Unless they are in immediate

danger, severely injured persons will not be moved until paramedics can attend

to them. Some injuries, such as severe cuts and lacerations or bums, may

require immediate treatment. Any first aid instructions that can be obtained from

doctors or paramedics, before an emergency-response squad arrives at the site

or before the injured person can be transported to the hospital, will be followed

closely.

Personnel with current first aid and CPR certification will be identified.

Only in non-emergency situations will an injured person be transported to the

hospital by means other than an ambulance.

Nearest hospital: Long Island College Hospital

339 Hicks Street

Brooklyn, NY 11201

(718) 780-1000

(directions from site to hospital found on Figure 2)

9.6 Emergency Site Evacuation Routes and Procedures

All project personnel will be instructed on proper emergency response

procedures and locations of emergency telephone numbers during the initial site

safety meeting. If an emergency occurs as a result of the site investigation

activities, including but not limited to fire, explosion or significant release of toxic

gas into the atmosphere, the Langan Project Manager will be verbally notified

immediately. All heavy equipment will be shut down and all personnel will

25

evacuate the work areas and assemble at the nearest intersection to be

accounted for and to receive further instructions.

9.7 Fire Prevention and Protection

In the event of a fire or explosion, procedures will include immediately

evacuating the site and notification of the Langan Project Manager of the

investigation activities. Portable fire extinguishers will be provided at the work

zone. The extinguishers located in the various locations should also be identified

prior to the start of work. No personnel will fight a fire beyond the stage where

it can be put out with a portable extinguisher (incipient stage).

9.7.1 Fire Prevention

Fires will be prevented by adhering to the following precautions:

Good housekeeping and storage of materials.

Storage of flammable liquids and gases away from oxidizers.

Shutting off engines to refuel.

Grounding and bonding metal containers during transfer of flammable

liquids.

Use of UL approved flammable storage cans.

Fire extinguishers rated at least 10 pounds ABC located on all heavy

equipment, in all trailers and near all hot work activities.

The person responsible for the control of fuel source hazards and the

maintenance of fire prevention and/or control equipment is the SSO.

9.8 Significant Vapor Release

Based on the proposed tasks, the potential for a significant vapor is low.

However, if a release occurs, the following steps will be taken:

Move all personnel to an upwind location. All non-essential personnel shall

evacuate.

Upgrade to Level C Respiratory Protection.

Downwind perimeter locations shall be monitored for volatile organics..

26

If the release poses a potential threat to human health or the environment in

the community, the Emergency Coordinator shall notify the Langan Project

Manager.

Local emergency response coordinators will be notified.

9.9 Overt Chemical Exposure

The following are standard procedures to treat chemical exposures. Other,

specific procedures detailed on the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) will be

followed, when necessary.

SKIN AND EYE: Use copious amounts of soap and water from eye-wash

kits and portable hand wash stations.

CONTACT: Wash/rinse affected areas thoroughly, then provide

appropriate medical attention. Eyes shall be rinsed for,

minimally, 15 minutes upon chemical contamination. Skin

shall also be rinsed for 15 minutes if contact with caustics,

acids or hydrogen peroxide occurs. Affected items of

clothing shall also be removed from contact with skin.

Providing wash water and soap will be the responsibility of each individual

contractor or subcontractor on-site.

9.10 Decontamination During Medical Emergencies

If emergency life-saving first aid and/or medical treatment is required, normal

decontamination procedures may need to be abbreviated or omitted. The SSO or

designee will accompany contaminated victims to the medical facility to advise

on matters involving decontamination when necessary. The outer garments can

be removed if they do not cause delays, interfere with treatment or aggravate

the problem. Respiratory equipment must always be removed. Protective

clothing can be cut away. If the outer contaminated garments cannot be safely

removed on site, a plastic barrier placed between the injured individual and clean

surfaces should be used to help prevent contamination of the inside of

ambulances and/or medical personnel. Outer garments may then be removed at

the medical facility. No attempt will be made to wash or rinse the victim if

27

his/her injuries are life threatening, unless it is known that the individual has

been contaminated with an extremely toxic or corrosive material which could

also cause severe injury or loss of life to emergency response personnel. For

minor medical problems or injuries, the normal decontamination procedures will

be followed.

9.11 Incident Reporting

Once first aid and/or emergency response needs have been met, the following

parties are to be contacted:

Langan Health and Safety Manager, Tony Moffa (215-491-6500)

Langan Project Manager, Chris McMahon or Steve Ciambruschini

(201-794-6900)

The employer of any injured worker who is not a Langan employee

For emergencies involving personal injury and/or exposure including near-

misses, the SSO or designee will complete and submit an Incident Report form

(Attachment H) within 48 hours. If the employee involved is not a Langan

employee, his employer shall receive a copy of the report.

9.12 Adverse Weather Conditions

In the event of adverse weather conditions, the SSO/Site Supervisor will

determine if work will continue without potentially risking the safety of all field

workers. Some of the items to be considered prior to determining if work should

continue are:

Potential for heat stress and heat-related injuries.

Potential for cold stress and cold-related injuries.

Treacherous weather-related working conditions (hail, rain, snow, ice, high

winds).

Limited visibility (fog).

Potential for electrical storms.

Earthquakes.

Other major incidents.

28

Site activities will be limited to daylight hours, or when suitable artificial light is

provided, and acceptable weather conditions prevail. The SSO will determine the

need to cease field operations or observe daily weather reports and evacuate, if

necessary, in case of severe inclement weather conditions.

9.13 Spill Control and Response

All small spills/environmental releases shall be contained as close to the source

as possible. Whenever possible, the MSDS will be consulted to assist in

determining proper waste characterization and the best means of containment

and cleanup. For small spills, sorbent materials such as sand, sawdust or

commercial sorbents should be placed directly on the substance to contain the

spill and aid recovery. Any acid spills should be diluted or neutralized carefully

prior to attempting recovery. Berms of earthen or sorbent materials can be used

to contain the leading edge of the spills. All spill containment materials will be

properly disposed. An exclusion zone of 50 to 100 feet around the spill area

should be established depending on the size of the spill.

All contractor vehicles shall have spill kits on them with enough material to

contain and absorb the worst-case spill from that vehicle. All vehicles and

equipment shall be inspected prior to be admitted on site. Any vehicle or piece

of equipment that develops a leak will be taken out of service and removed from

the job site.

All subcontractor employees as well as Langan employees will be 40-hour

HAZWOPER trained.

The following seven steps shall be taken by the Emergency Coordinator:

1. Determine the nature, identity and amounts of major spills.

2. Make sure all unnecessary persons are removed from the spill area.

3. Notify the Site Supervisor or SSO immediately.

4. Use proper PPE in consultation with the SSO/Site Supervisor.

5. If a flammable liquid, gas or vapor is involved, remove all ignition sources

and use non-sparking and/or explosion-proof equipment to contain or clean

up the spill (diesel-only vehicles, air-operated pumps, etc.)

29

6. If possible, try to stop the leak with appropriate material.

7. Remove all surrounding materials that can react or compound with the

spill.

In addition to the spill control and response procedures described in this HASP,

Langan personnel will coordinate with the designated project manager relative to

spill response and control actions. Notification to the Project Manager must be

immediate and, to the extent possible, include the following information:

Time and location of the spill.

Type and nature of the material spilled.

Amount spilled.

Whether the spill has affected or has a potential to affect a waterway or

sewer.

A brief description of affected areas/equipment.

Whether the spill has been contained.

Expected time of cleanup completion. If spill cleanup cannot be handled by

Langan's on-site personnel alone, such fact must be conveyed to the Project

Manager immediately.

Langan shall not make any notification of spills to outside agencies. The client

will notify regulatory agencies as per their reporting procedures.

9.14 Emergency Equipment

The following minimum emergency equipment shall be kept and maintained on

site:

Industrial first aid kit.

Fire extinguishers (one per site).

Absorbent material.

30

9.15 Restoration and Salvage

After an emergency, prompt restoration of utilities, fire protection equipment,

medical supplies and other equipment will reduce the possibility of further

losses. Some of the items that may need to be addressed are:

Refilling fire extinguishers.

Refilling medical supplies.

Recharging eyewashes and/or showers.

Replenishing spill control supplies.

10.0 TRAINING

10.1 General Health and Safety Training

With Langan corporate policy, and pursuant to 29 CFR 1910.120, hazardous

waste site workers shall, at the time of job assignment, have received a

minimum of 40 hours of initial health and safety training for hazardous waste site

operations unless otherwise noted in the above reference. At a minimum, the

training shall have consisted of instruction in the topics outlined in the standard.

Personnel who have not satisfied the requirements for initial training shall not be

allowed to work in any site activities in which they may be exposed to hazards

(chemical or physical).

10.2 Annual Eight-Hour Refresher Training

Annual eight-hour refresher training will be required of all hazardous waste site

field personnel in order to maintain their qualifications for site work. The training

will cover a review of 1910.120 requirements and related company programs

and procedures. The SSO will be required to have the eight-hour HAZWOPER

supervisor training.

10.3 Site-Specific Training

Prior to commencement of site activities, all field personnel assigned to the

project will have completed training that will specifically address the activities,

procedures, monitoring, and equipment used in the site operations. It will

31

include a documented verbal review of the entire HASP and all the provisions

within the HASP document. Should any new employees arrive on-site, they will

also be given a documented full HASP review ‟ or one that address the

appropriate tasks that remain at the time of the new employee’s arrival.

10.4 Onsite Safety Briefings

Project personnel and visitors will participate in documented daily on-site health

and safety briefings (“Tailgate Talks”) led by the SSO/Site Supervisor to assist

site personnel in safely conducting their work activities. The briefings will include

information on operations to be conducted that shift, changes in work practices

or changes in the site's environmental conditions, as well as periodic

reinforcement of previously discussed topics. The briefings will also provide a

forum to facilitate conformance with safety requirements and to identify

performance deficiencies related to safety during daily activities or as a result of

safety inspections. The meetings will also be an opportunity for the work crews

to be updated on monitoring results. Prior to starting any new activity, a training

session will be held for crew members involved in the activity. The Safety

Briefing form (Attachment I) can be used to facilitate this effort.

10.5 First Aid and CPR

The SSO will identify those individuals with first aid and CPR training in order to

ensure that emergency medical treatment is available during field activities. The

training will be consistent with the requirements of the American Red Cross or

the National Safety Council.

10.6 Hazard Communication

All material brought on-site will be in the appropriate containers and will be

properly labeled. The MSDS for unleaded gasoline, diesel fuel, and hydraulic

fluid are attached. Langan’s written Hazard Communication program, in

compliance with 29 CFR 1910.1200, is maintained in Langan’s office in

Elmwood Park, New Jersey.

32

11.0 RECORDKEEPING

The following is a summary of required health and safety logs, reports and recordkeeping.

11.1 Field Change Authorization Request

A field change authorization request is to be completed for requesting a change

to this HASP (Attachment B). Any changes to the work to be performed that is

not included in the HASP will require an Addendum that is approved by the

Langan Project Manager and Langan HSC to be prepared. Approved changes

will be reviewed with all field personnel at a safety briefing.

11.2 Medical and Training Records

Copies or verification of training (40-hour, 8-hour, supervisor, site-specific

training, documentation of three-day OJT, and respirator fit-test records) and

medical clearance for Site work and respirator use will be maintained in the

office and available upon request. Records for all subcontractor employees must

also be available upon request. All employee medical records will be maintained

by the HSC.

11.3 Onsite Log

A log of personnel on site each day will be kept by the SSO or designee.

11.4 Daily Safety Meetings (“Tailgate Talks”)

Completed Safety Briefing forms will be maintained by the SSO.

11.5 Exposure Records

All personal monitoring results, laboratory reports, calculations and air sampling

data sheets are part of an employee exposure record. These records will be

maintained by the SSO/Site Supervisor during site work. At the end of the

project they will be maintained according to 29 CFR 1910.1020.

33

11.6 Incident Reports

The incident reporting and investigation during site work will follow the

procedures specified here in.

11.7 OSHA Form 300

An OSHA Form 300 will be kept at the Langan Office in Doylestown,

Pennsylvania. All recordable injuries or illnesses will be recorded on this form.

Subcontractor employers must also meet the requirements of maintaining an

OSHA 300 form. The Incident Report form used to capture the details of work-

related injuries/illnesses meets the requirements of the OSHA Form 301

(supplemental record) and must be maintained with the OSHA Form 300 for all

recordable injuries or illnesses.

11.8 Hazard Communication Program/MSDS

Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) have been obtained for applicable

substances and are included in this EHS Plan (Attachment A). Langan’s written

Hazard Communication program, in compliance with 29 CFR 1910.1200, is

maintained by the HSC in Elmwood Park, New Jersey.

11.9 Work Permits

All work permits, including, but not limited to, street-opening, hot work,

lockout/tagout, and line-breaking permits will be maintained in the project files.

12.0 FIELD PERSONNEL REVIEW

This form serves as documentation that field personnel have been verbally given a full

HASP review by Langan personnel, and understand the provisions of this EHS Plan. It is

maintained on site by the SSO as a project record.

Each field team member shall sign this section after Site-specific training is completed

and before being permitted to work onsite.

34

I have been given a verbal full HASP review by Langan personnel and understand the

information presented. I will comply with the provisions contained herein.

Name (Print and Sign) Company Date

\\langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013-07 - NYSDEC RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Appendix D - HASP\HASP-365 Bond

Street (2013-07-10).doc

TABLES

TABLE 1

SUSPECTED CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

365 BOND STREET

BROOKLYN, NEW YORK

1 of 1

Contaminant Of Concern

Affected Media

VOLATILES

Benzene Soil Vapor / Soil / Groundwater

Ethylbenzene Soil Vapor / Soil / Groundwater

n�propylbenzene Soil Vapor / Soil / Groundwater

MTBE Soil Vapor / Soil / Groundwater

Toluene Soil Vapor / Soil / Groundwater

Xylenes Soil Vapor / Soil / Groundwater

SEMI�VOLATILES

Common Historic Fill Contaminants:

Benzo(a)anthracene Soil / Groundwater

Benzo(b)flouranthene Soil / Groundwater

Benzo(k)flouranthene Soil / Groundwater

Benzo(a)pyrene Soil / Groundwater

Chrysene Soil / Groundwater

Indeno(1,2,3�cd)pyrene Soil / Groundwater

PESTICIDES / PCBs

Miscellaneous TBD Soil Vapor / Soil / Groundwater

METALS

Miscellaneous TBD Soil / Groundwater

\\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013�07 � OER Phase II RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Appendix D � HASP\Tables\HASP TABLE 1 �

Contaminants of Concern.doc

TABLE 2

SELECTED POTENTIAL CHEMICAL EXPOSURE LIMITS AND HEALTH EFFECTS

365 BOND STREET

BROOKLYN, NEW YORK

\\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013�07 � OER Phase II RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Appendix D � HASP\Tables\HASP TABLE 2 � Chem Exposure

Limits.doc

1 of 4

Chemical Permissible

Exposure Limit

IDLH Limit Exposure Routes Exposure Symptoms

Benzene 1 ppm 50 ppm Inhalation, Skin

Absorption, Ingestion,

skin and/or eye contact

Irritate eyes, skin, nose; respiratory

system; giddiness; head, nausea,

staggered gait; fatigue, anorexia,

lassitude; dermatitis; bone marrow

depression; [carcinogenic]

Toluene 200 ppm 500 ppm Inhalation, Skin



Irritate eyes, nose; fatigue,

weakness, confusion, euphoria,

dizziness, headache; dilated pupils,

lacrimation; nervousness, muscle

fatigue, insomnia; paresthesia;

dermatitis; liver, kidney damage;

mucous membrane; narcosis, coma

Ethylbenzene 100 ppm 800 ppm (10% LEL) Inhalation, Ingestion,


Irritate eyes, skin, mucous

membrane ;headache, dermatitis;

narcosis, coma

Methyl Tert�Butyl Ether

(MTBE)

None Established 1.6% Inhalation, Ingestion,


Irritate eyes, skin, respiratory tract,

kidney damage, headache, depress

nervouse central system, nausea,

vomiting, dizziness, loss of

consciousness, liver damage,

lymphomas, leukemias, may cause

cancer

Xylenes 100 ppm 900 ppm Inhalation, Skin



Irritate eyes, skin, nose, throat;

dizziness, excitement, drowsiness,

incoordination, staggering gait; corn

vacuolization; anorexia, nausea,

vomit, abdominal pain; dermatitis

TABLE 2


365 BOND STREET

BROOKLYN, NEW YORK


Limits.doc

2 of 4


Exposure Limit


Total Volatile Organics 15 ppm 150 ppm Inhalation, Skin

Absorption, Ingestion

Irritation eyes, skin, nose, throat,

respiratory system; nausea; flush

face, neck; dizziness,

incoordination; headache,

drowsiness; skin erythema (skin

redness); liver damage; [potential

occupational carcinogen]

Benzo(a)anthracene 0.2 mg/m3 80 mg/m3 Inhalation, Skin


Irritate eyes, skin, upper respiratory

system, cough

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.2 mg/m3 80 mg/m3 Inhalation, Skin



system, cough

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.2 mg/m3 80 mg/m3 Inhalation, Skin



system, cough

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.2 mg/m3 80 mg/m3 Inhalation, Skin



system, cough

Chrysene 0.2 mg/m3 80 mg/m3 Inhalation, Skin



system, cough

Indeno (1,2,3�cd) pyrene 0.2 mg/m3 80 mg/m3 Inhalation, Skin



system, cough

Pesticides 1 mg/m3 500 mg/m3 Inhalation, Skin



Irritation eyes, skin; paresthesia

tongue, lips, face; tremor; anxiety,

dizziness, confusion, malaise

(vague feeling of discomfort),

headache, lassitude (weakness,

exhaustion); convulsions; paresis

hands; vomiting; [potential


TABLE 2


365 BOND STREET

BROOKLYN, NEW YORK


Limits.doc

3 of 4


Exposure Limit


Lead

0.05 mg/mg3 100 mg/mg3 Inhalation, Ingestion,

Skin and/or Eye Contact

Lassitude (weakness, exhaustion),

insomnia; facial pallor; anorexia,

weight loss, malnutrition;

constipation, abdominal pain, colic;

anemia; gingival lead line; tremor;

paralysis wrist, ankles;

encephalopathy; kidney disease;

irritation eyes; hypertension

Arsenic

0.010 mg/m3

5 mg/m3

Inhalation, Ingestion,

Skin Absorption, Skin

and/or Eye Contact

Ulceration of nasal septum,

dermatitis, gastrointestinal

disturbances, peripheral

neuropathy, resp irritation,

hyperpigmentation of skin,

[potential occupational carcinogen]

Hexavalent Chromium

5 mg/m3 250 mg/m3 Inhalation, Ingestion,


Irritation eyes, skin; lung fibrosis

(histologic)

Total Chromium

5 mg/m3 250 mg/m3 Inhalation, Ingestion,


Irritation eyes, skin; lung fibrosis

(histologic)

Mercury

0.1 mg/m3 10 mg/m3 Inhalation, Ingestion,

Skin Absorption, Skin

and/or Eye Contact

Irritation eyes, skin; cough, chest

pain, dyspnea (breathing difficulty),

bronchitis, pneumonitis; tremor,

insomnia, irritability, indecision,


exhaustion); stomatitis, salivation;

gastrointestinal disturbance,

anorexia, weight loss; proteinuria

Copper 1 mg/m3 100 mg/m3 Inhalation, Ingestion,


Irritation eyes, respiratory system;

cough, dyspnea (breathing

difficulty), wheezing; [potential


TABLE 2


365 BOND STREET

BROOKLYN, NEW YORK


Limits.doc

4 of 4


Exposure Limit


Nickel 1 mg/m3 10 mg/m3 Inhalation, Skin



Irritation eyes, skin; cough, chest

pain, dyspnea (breathing difficulty),

bronchitis, pneumonitis; tremor,

insomnia, irritability, indecision,


exhaustion); stomatitis, salivation;

gastrointestinal disturbance,

anorexia, weight loss; proteinuria

--- No exposure limits listed in the NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards dated November 2010.

of 1

TABLE 3

HAZARD ANALYSIS

365 BOND STREET

BROOKLYN, NEW YORK

Potential Hazard

Utility

Markout

Surveying

Drilling

Groundwater Sampling

Inhalation of

volatiles

low

low

low to moderate

low to moderate

Skin and eye

contact

low to moderate

low to moderate

moderate to high

moderate to high

Ingestion

low

low

low to moderate

low to moderate

Inhalation of dust

low low

moderate low

Heat stress

depends on

temperature

depends on

temperature

depends on

temperature

depends on

temperature

Cold stress

depends on

temperature

depends on

temperature

depends on

temperature

depends on

temperature

Confined Space

Entry

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

Heavy equipment

low low

moderate to high low

Noise

low low

moderate to high

low

Tripping

moderate

moderate

moderate

moderate

PPE

low low

low to moderate

low to moderate

Utilities

low

low

moderate

low

Other Physical

hazards

moderate

moderate

moderate to high

moderate

Biological hazards

low

low

low

low

Flammable

hazards

low

low

low

low

\\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013207 2 OER Phase II RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Appendix D

2 HASP\Tables\HASP TABLE 3 2 Hazard Analysis.doc

\\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013�07 � OER Phase II RIWP REVISED

(365 Bond Street)\Appendix D � HASP\Tables\HASP TABLE 4 � Action Levels.doc

Page 1 of 1

TABLE 4

INSTRUMENTATION ACTION LEVELS

365 BOND STREET

BROOKLYN, NEW YORK

Instrument Action Level Level of Protection /

Action Required

PID*/FID* < 10 ppm within AOC zone Level D

> 10 ppm (initial) Stop work. Resume work

once readings are below 15

ppm.

> 10 ppm and < 30 ppm

(steady state condition) within

breathing zone

Level C/Initiate Perimeter

Monitoring

> 30 ppm (steady state

condition) within AOC zone

Stop Work / Suppress

Emissions / Evacuate and re�

evaluate.

>10 ppm sustained for 1

minute at AOC site boundary.

Stop Work / Backfill source of

emissions and re�evaluate.

BKD = Background concentration

*PID/FID readings are taken at personnel breathing zone height using a 10.2V lamp PID or

equivalent.

of 1

TABLE 5

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT

365 BOND STREET

BROOKLYN, NEW YORK

Respiratory Protection: Level D:

No respirator required.

Level C: Half�face, Air Purifying Respirator (APR) with combination HEPA

(dusts, fumes, aerosols) and organic vapor cartridges. The respirator

will be NIOSH�approved. Level C � supplemental

by task

Fullface, Air Purifying Respirator (APR) with combination HEPA

(dusts, fumes, aerosols), acid gas, organic vapor cartridges. The

respirator will be NIOSH�approved.

Personal Protective Clothing: Level D:

Hard�hat, traffic vest (if working on or adjacent to the roadway), long

sleeve work shirt & work pants of natural fibers, safety glasses or

goggles, steel�toed boots, hearing protection (if needed), nitril inner

gloves and leather outer gloves. Level D � supplemental

PPE by task

Tyvek disposal suit

Level C:

Chemically resistant outer boots and Chemical resistant Tyvek

disposal suite.

\\LANGAN.COM\DATA\EP\DATA5\100287501\ENGINEERING DATA\ENVIRONMENTAL\REPORTS\2013�07 � OER PHASE II RIWP REVISED (365 BOND

STREET)\APPENDIX D � HASP\TABLES\HASP TABLE 5 � PPE.DOC

FIGURES

KINGS COUNTYKINGS COUNTYKINGS COUNTYKINGS COUNTY NEW YORKNEW YORKNEW YORKNEW YORKBROOKLYNBROOKLYNBROOKLYNBROOKLYN

rpdp=pfqb=il`^qflk=j^mmêçéçëÉÇ=_çåÇ=píêÉÉí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí

Project

Date Scale Figure

100287502100287502100287502100287502 1/17/20131/17/20131/17/20131/17/2013 1"=2000'1"=2000'1"=2000'1"=2000' 1111Project No.

© 2013 Langan

Pa

th: \\

La

ng

an

.co

m\d

ata

\EP

\da

ta5

\10

02

875

01

\Arc

GIS

\Arc

Ma

p_

Do

cu

me

nts

\20

13

-01

- B

CA

\36

5\F

igu

re 1

- S

ite

Lo

ca

tio

n P

lan

.mxd

Notes:

Topographic basemap is provided through Langan’s Esri ArcGIS software licensing and ArcGIS online © 2011 National Geographic Society, i-cubed.

´

0 2,000 4,0001,000

Feet

SITE

River Drive Center 1, 619 River Drive

Elmwood Park, NJ 07407-1338

T: 201.794.6900 F: 201.794.0366 www.langan.com






Emergency Route to Long Island College Hospital (Phone # (718) 780-1000 :

1 Start traveling northeast on Bond Street toward 1st Street

2 Turn Left onto Sackett Street

3 Turn right onto Hicks Street

5 Arrive at Long Island College Hospital, 339 Hicks Street, Brooklyn NY 11201

MAP REFERENCE: Google Maps

Project

Manhattan New York

ELMWOOD PK, NJ NEW YORK, NY PHILADELPHIA, PA DOYLESTOWN , PA NEW HAVEN, CT MIAMI, FL PROJECT NO. DATE SCALE FIGURE NO.

(201) 794-6900 (212) 964-7888 (215) 864-0640 (215) 348-7101 (203) 562-5771 (305) 362-1166 100287501 8/10/2012 NTS 2

363-365 BOND STREET & 400 CARROLL STREET

EMERGENGY HOSPITAL ROUTE MAPLangan Engineering and Environmental Services

\\langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2012-10 OER Phase II RIWP\Appendix C - HASP\Figures\Figure 2 - Hospital Route/Figure 2 - Hospital Route

ATTACHMENT A

Material Safety Data Sheets

(MSDSs)

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Diesel Fuel (All Types) MSDS No. 9909

Revision Date: 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 7

EMERGENCY OVERVIEW CAUTION!

OSHA/NFPA COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID - SLIGHT TO MODERATE IRRITANT EFFECTS CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM HARMFUL OR FATAL IF SWALLOWED

Moderate fire hazard. Avoid breathing vapors or mists. May cause dizziness and drowsiness. May cause moderate eye irritation and skin irritation (rash). Long-term, repeated exposure may cause skin cancer. If ingested, do NOT induce vomiting, as this may cause chemical pneumonia (fluid in the lungs).

NFPA 704 (Section 16)

1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY INFORMATION

Hess Corporation 1 Hess Plaza Woodbridge, NJ 07095-0961

EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER (24 hrs): CHEMTREC (800) 424-9300 COMPANY CONTACT (business hours): Corporate Safety (732) 750-6000 MSDS INTERNET WEBSITE: www.hess.com (See Environment, Health, Safety & Social Responsibility)

SYNONYMS: Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD); Low Sulfur Diesel; Motor Vehicle Diesel Fuel; Diesel Fuel #2; Dyed Diesel Fuel; Non-Road, Locomotive and Marine Diesel Fuel; Tax-exempt Diesel Fuel

See Section 16 for abbreviations and acronyms. 2. COMPOSITION and CHEMICAL INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS

INGREDIENT NAME (CAS No.) CONCENTRATION PERCENT BY WEIGHT Diesel Fuel (68476-34-6) 100 Naphthalene (91-20-3) Typically < 0.01 A complex mixture of hydrocarbons with carbon numbers in the range C9 and higher. Diesel fuel may be dyed (red) for tax purposes. May contain a multifunctional additive.

3. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION EYESContact with liquid or vapor may cause mild irritation.

SKINMay cause skin irritation with prolonged or repeated contact. Practically non-toxic if absorbed following acute (single) exposure. Liquid may be absorbed through the skin in toxic amounts if large areas of skin are repeatedly exposed.

INGESTIONThe major health threat of ingestion occurs from the danger of aspiration (breathing) of liquid drops into the lungs, particularly from vomiting. Aspiration may result in chemical pneumonia (fluid in the lungs), severe lung damage, respiratory failure and even death.

Ingestion may cause gastrointestinal disturbances, including irritation, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, and central nervous system (brain) effects similar to alcohol intoxication. In severe cases, tremors, convulsions, loss of consciousness, coma, respiratory arrest, and death may occur.

http://www.hess.com/



INHALATIONExcessive exposure may cause irritations to the nose, throat, lungs and respiratory tract. Central nervous system (brain) effects may include headache, dizziness, loss of balance and coordination, unconsciousness, coma, respiratory failure, and death.

WARNING: the burning of any hydrocarbon as a fuel in an area without adequate ventilation may result in hazardous levels of combustion products, including carbon monoxide, and inadequate oxygen levels, which may cause unconsciousness, suffocation, and death.

CHRONIC EFFECTS and CARCINOGENICITYSimilar products produced skin cancer and systemic toxicity in laboratory animals following repeated applications. The significance of these results to human exposures has not been determined - see Section 11 Toxicological Information.

IARC classifies whole diesel fuel exhaust particulates as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A). NIOSH regards whole diesel fuel exhaust particulates as a potential cause of occupational lung cancer based on animal studies and limited evidence in humans.

MEDICAL CONDITIONS AGGRAVATED BY EXPOSURE Irritation from skin exposure may aggravate existing open wounds, skin disorders, and dermatitis (rash).

4. FIRST AID MEASURES EYESIn case of contact with eyes, immediately flush with clean, low-pressure water for at least 15 min. Hold eyelids open to ensure adequate flushing. Seek medical attention.

SKINRemove contaminated clothing. Wash contaminated areas thoroughly with soap and water or waterless hand cleanser. Obtain medical attention if irritation or redness develops.

INGESTIONDO NOT INDUCE VOMITING. Do not give liquids. Obtain immediate medical attention. If spontaneous vomiting occurs, lean victim forward to reduce the risk of aspiration. Monitor for breathing difficulties. Small amounts of material which enter the mouth should be rinsed out until the taste is dissipated.

INHALATIONRemove person to fresh air. If person is not breathing provide artificial respiration. If necessary, provide additional oxygen once breathing is restored if trained to do so. Seek medical attention immediately.

5. FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES FLAMMABLE PROPERTIES: FLASH POINT: > 125 oF (> 52 oC) minimum PMCC AUTOIGNITION POINT: 494 oF (257 oC) OSHA/NFPA FLAMMABILITY CLASS: 2 (COMBUSTIBLE) LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT (%): 0.6 UPPER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT (%): 7.5

FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS Vapors may be ignited rapidly when exposed to heat, spark, open flame or other source of ignition. When mixed with air and exposed to an ignition source, flammable vapors can burn in the open or explode in confined spaces. Being heavier than air, vapors may travel long distances to an ignition source and flash back. Runoff to sewer may cause fire or explosion hazard.

EXTINGUISHING MEDIA SMALL FIRES: Any extinguisher suitable for Class B fires, dry chemical, CO2, water spray, fire fighting foam, or Halon.



LARGE FIRES: Water spray, fog or fire fighting foam. Water may be ineffective for fighting the fire, but may be used to cool fire-exposed containers.

FIRE FIGHTING INSTRUCTIONS Small fires in the incipient (beginning) stage may typically be extinguished using handheld portable fire extinguishers and other fire fighting equipment.

Firefighting activities that may result in potential exposure to high heat, smoke or toxic by-products of combustion should require NIOSH/MSHA- approved pressure-demand self-contained breathing apparatus with full facepiece and full protective clothing.

Isolate area around container involved in fire. Cool tanks, shells, and containers exposed to fire and excessive heat with water. For massive fires the use of unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles may be advantageous to further minimize personnel exposure. Major fires may require withdrawal, allowing the tank to burn. Large storage tank fires typically require specially trained personnel and equipment to extinguish the fire, often including the need for properly applied fire fighting foam.

See Section 16 for the NFPA 704 Hazard Rating.

6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES ACTIVATE FACILITY’S SPILL CONTINGENCY OR EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN.

Evacuate nonessential personnel and remove or secure all ignition sources. Consider wind direction; stay upwind and uphill, if possible. Evaluate the direction of product travel, diking, sewers, etc. to confirm spill areas. Spills may infiltrate subsurface soil and groundwater; professional assistance may be necessary to determine the extent of subsurface impact.

Carefully contain and stop the source of the spill, if safe to do so. Protect bodies of water by diking, absorbents, or absorbent boom, if possible. Do not flush down sewer or drainage systems, unless system is designed and permitted to handle such material. The use of fire fighting foam may be useful in certain situations to reduce vapors. The proper use of water spray may effectively disperse product vapors or the liquid itself, preventing contact with ignition sources or areas/equipment that require protection.

Take up with sand or other oil absorbing materials. Carefully shovel, scoop or sweep up into a waste container for reclamation or disposal - caution, flammable vapors may accumulate in closed containers. Response and clean-up crews must be properly trained and must utilize proper protective equipment (see Section 8).

7. HANDLING and STORAGE HANDLING PRECAUTIONS Handle as a combustible liquid. Keep away from heat, sparks, and open flame! Electrical equipment should be approved for classified area. Bond and ground containers during product transfer to reduce the possibility of static-initiated fire or explosion.

Diesel fuel, and in particular low and ultra low sulfur diesel fuel, has the capability of accumulating a static electrical charge of sufficient energy to cause a fire/explosion in the presence of lower flashpoint products such as gasoline. The accumulation of such a static charge occurs as the diesel flows through pipelines, filters, nozzles and various work tasks such as tank/container filling, splash loading, tank cleaning; product sampling; tank gauging; cleaning, mixing, vacuum truck operations, switch loading, and product agitation. There is a greater potential for static charge accumulation in cold temperature, low humidity conditions.

Documents such as 29 CFR OSHA 1910.106 "Flammable and Combustible Liquids, NFPA 77 Recommended Practice on Static Electricity, API 2003 "Protection Against Ignitions Arising Out of Static, Lightning, and Stray Currents and ASTM D4865 "Standard Guide for Generation and Dissipation of Static



Electricity in Petroleum Fuel Systems" address special precautions and design requirements involving loading rates, grounding, bonding, filter installation, conductivity additives and especially the hazards associated with "switch loading." ["Switch Loading" is when a higher flash point product (such as diesel) is loaded into tanks previously containing a low flash point product (such as gasoline) and the electrical charge generated during loading of the diesel results in a static ignition of the vapor from the previous cargo (gasoline).]

Note: When conductivity additives are used or are necessary the product should achieve 25 picosiemens/meter or greater at the handling temperature.

STORAGE PRECAUTIONS Keep away from flame, sparks, excessive temperatures and open flame. Use approved vented containers. Keep containers closed and clearly labeled. Empty product containers or vessels may contain explosive vapors. Do not pressurize, cut, heat, weld or expose such containers to sources of ignition.

Store in a well-ventilated area. This storage area should comply with NFPA 30 "Flammable and Combustible Liquid Code". Avoid storage near incompatible materials. The cleaning of tanks previously containing this product should follow API Recommended Practice (RP) 2013 "Cleaning Mobile Tanks In Flammable and Combustible Liquid Service" and API RP 2015 "Cleaning Petroleum Storage Tanks".

WORK/HYGIENIC PRACTICES Emergency eye wash capability should be available in the near proximity to operations presenting a potential splash exposure. Use good personal hygiene practices. Avoid repeated and/or prolonged skin exposure. Wash hands before eating, drinking, smoking, or using toilet facilities. Do not use as a cleaning solvent on the skin. Do not use solvents or harsh abrasive skin cleaners for washing this product from exposed skin areas. Waterless hand cleaners are effective. Promptly remove contaminated clothing and launder before reuse. Use care when laundering to prevent the formation of flammable vapors which could ignite via washer or dryer. Consider the need to discard contaminated leather shoes and gloves.

8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS and PERSONAL PROTECTION EXPOSURE LIMITS Exposure Limits

Components (CAS No.) Source TWA/STEL Note

Diesel Fuel: (68476-34-6) OSHA ACGIH

5 mg/m, as mineral oil mist 100 mg/m3 (as totally hydrocarbon vapor) TWA

A3, skin

Naphthalene (91-20-3) OSHA ACGIH

10 ppm TWA 10 ppm TWA / 15 ppm STEL

A4, Skin

ENGINEERING CONTROLS Use adequate ventilation to keep vapor concentrations of this product below occupational exposure and flammability limits, particularly in confined spaces.

EYE/FACE PROTECTION Safety glasses or goggles are recommended where there is a possibility of splashing or spraying.

SKIN PROTECTION Gloves constructed of nitrile, neoprene, or PVC are recommended. Chemical protective clothing such as of E.I. DuPont TyChem®, Saranex® or equivalent recommended based on degree of exposure. Note: The resistance of specific material may vary from product to product as well as with degree of exposure. Consult manufacturer specifications for further information.



RESPIRATORY PROTECTION A NIOSH/MSHA-approved air-purifying respirator with organic vapor cartridges or canister may be permissible under certain circumstances where airborne concentrations are or may be expected to exceed exposure limits or for odor or irritation. Protection provided by air-purifying respirators is limited. Refer to OSHA 29 CFR 1910.134, NIOSH Respirator Decision Logic, and the manufacturer for additional guidance on respiratory protection selection.

Use a positive pressure, air-supplied respirator if there is a potential for uncontrolled release, exposure levels are not known, in oxygen-deficient atmospheres, or any other circumstance where an air-purifying respirator may not provide adequate protection.

9. PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL PROPERTIES APPEARANCE Clear, straw-yellow liquid. Dyed fuel oil will be red or reddish-colored.

ODOR Mild, petroleum distillate odor

BASIC PHYSICAL PROPERTIESBOILING RANGE: 320 to 690 oF (160 to 366 oC) VAPOR PRESSURE: 0.009 psia @ 70 oF (21 oC) VAPOR DENSITY (air = 1): > 1.0 SPECIFIC GRAVITY (H2O = 1): 0.83 to 0.88 @ 60 oF (16 oC) PERCENT VOLATILES: 100 % EVAPORATION RATE: Slow; varies with conditions SOLUBILITY (H2O): Negligible

10. STABILITY and REACTIVITY STABILITY: Stable. Hazardous polymerization will not occur.

CONDITIONS TO AVOID and INCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS Avoid high temperatures, open flames, sparks, welding, smoking and other ignition sources. Keep away from strong oxidizers; Viton ®; Fluorel ®

HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS Carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and non-combusted hydrocarbons (smoke).

11. TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES ACUTE TOXICITY Acute dermal LD50 (rabbits): > 5 ml/kg Acute oral LD50 (rats): 9 ml/kg Primary dermal irritation: extremely irritating (rabbits) Draize eye irritation: non-irritating (rabbits) Guinea pig sensitization: negative

CHRONIC EFFECTS AND CARCINOGENICITY Carcinogenic: OSHA: NO IARC: NO NTP: NO ACGIH: A3

Studies have shown that similar products produce skin tumors in laboratory animals following repeated applications without washing or removal. The significance of this finding to human exposure has not been determined. Other studies with active skin carcinogens have shown that washing the animal’s skin with soap and water between applications reduced tumor formation.

MUTAGENICITY (genetic effects) This material has been positive in a mutagenicity study.



12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION Keep out of sewers, drainage areas, and waterways. Report spills and releases, as applicable, under Federal and State regulations.

13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS Consult federal, state and local waste regulations to determine appropriate disposal options.

14. TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION PROPER SHIPPING NAME: Diesel Fuel Placard (International Only): HAZARD CLASS and PACKING GROUP: 3, PG III DOT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: NA 1993 (Domestic) UN 1202 (International) DOT SHIPPING LABEL: None

Use Combustible Placard if shipping in bulk domestically 15. REGULATORY INFORMATION U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, and LOCAL REGULATORY INFORMATION This product and its constituents listed herein are on the EPA TSCA Inventory. Any spill or uncontrolled release of this product, including any substantial threat of release, may be subject to federal, state and/or local reporting requirements. This product and/or its constituents may also be subject to other regulations at the state and/or local level. Consult those regulations applicable to your facility/operation.

CLEAN WATER ACT (OIL SPILLS) Any spill or release of this product to "navigable waters" (essentially any surface water, including certain wetlands) or adjoining shorelines sufficient to cause a visible sheen or deposit of a sludge or emulsion must be reported immediately to the National Response Center (1-800-424-8802) as required by U.S. Federal Law. Also contact appropriate state and local regulatory agencies as required.

CERCLA SECTION 103 and SARA SECTION 304 (RELEASE TO THE ENVIRONMENT) The CERCLA definition of hazardous substances contains a “petroleum exclusion” clause which exempts crude oil, refined, and unrefined petroleum products and any indigenous components of such. However, other federal reporting requirements (e.g., SARA Section 304 as well as the Clean Water Act if the spill occurs on navigable waters) may still apply.

SARA SECTION 311/312 - HAZARD CLASSES ACUTE HEALTH CHRONIC HEALTH FIRE SUDDEN RELEASE OF PRESSURE REACTIVE

X X X -- --

SARA SECTION 313 - SUPPLIER NOTIFICATIONThis product may contain listed chemicals below the de minimis levels which therefore are not subject to the supplier notification requirements of Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986 and of 40 CFR 372. If you may be required to report releases of chemicals listed in 40 CFR 372.28, you may contact Hess Corporate Safety if you require additional information regarding this product.

CALIFORNIA PROPOSITON 65 LIST OF CHEMICALS This product contains the following chemicals that are included on the Proposition 65 "List of Chemicals" required by the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986:

INGREDIENT NAME (CAS NUMBER) Date ListedDiesel Engine Exhaust (no CAS Number listed) 10/01/1990

CANADIAN REGULATORY INFORMATION (WHMIS) Class B, Division 3 (Combustible Liquid) and Class D, Division 2, Subdivision B (Toxic by other means)



16. OTHER INFORMATION NFPA® HAZARD RATING HEALTH: 0 FIRE: 2 REACTIVITY: 0 Refer to NFPA 704 “Identification of the Fire Hazards of Materials” for further information HMIS® HAZARD RATING HEALTH: 1 * * Chronic FIRE: 2 PHYSICAL: 0

SUPERSEDES MSDS DATED: 02/28/2001

ABBREVIATIONS: AP = Approximately < = Less than > = Greater than N/A = Not Applicable N/D = Not Determined ppm = parts per million

ACRONYMS: ACGIH American Conference of Governmental

Industrial Hygienists AIHA American Industrial Hygiene Association ANSI American National Standards Institute

(212) 642-4900 API American Petroleum Institute (202) 682-8000 CERCLA Comprehensive Emergency Response,

Compensation, and Liability Act DOT U.S. Department of Transportation

[General info: (800) 467-4922] EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency HMIS Hazardous Materials Information System IARC International Agency For Research On

Cancer MSHA Mine Safety and Health Administration NFPA National Fire Protection Association

(617)770-3000 NIOSH National Institute of Occupational Safety

and Health NOIC Notice of Intended Change (proposed

change to ACGIH TLV)

NTP National Toxicology Program OPA Oil Pollution Act of 1990 OSHA U.S. Occupational Safety & Health

Administration PEL Permissible Exposure Limit (OSHA) RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery

Act REL Recommended Exposure Limit (NIOSH) SARA Superfund Amendments and

Reauthorization Act of 1986 Title III SCBA Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus SPCC Spill Prevention, Control, and

Countermeasures STEL Short-Term Exposure Limit (generally

15 minutes) TLV Threshold Limit Value (ACGIH) TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TWA Time Weighted Average (8 hr.) WEEL Workplace Environmental Exposure

Level (AIHA) WHMIS Canadian Workplace Hazardous

Materials Information System DISCLAIMER OF EXPRESSED AND IMPLIED WARRANTIES Information presented herein has been compiled from sources considered to be dependable, and is accurate and reliable to the best of our knowledge and belief, but is not guaranteed to be so. Since conditions of use are beyond our control, we make no warranties, expressed or implied, except those that may be contained in our written contract of sale or acknowledgment.

Vendor assumes no responsibility for injury to vendee or third persons proximately caused by the material if reasonable safety procedures are not adhered to as stipulated in the data sheet. Additionally, vendor assumes no responsibility for injury to vendee or third persons proximately caused by abnormal use of the material, even if reasonable safety procedures are followed. Furthermore, vendee assumes the risk in their use of the material.

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Gasoline, All Grades MSDS No. 9950


NFPA 704 (Section 16)

EMERGENCY OVERVIEW DANGER!

EXTREMELY FLAMMABLE - EYE AND MUCOUS MEMBRANE IRRITANT - EFFECTS CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM - HARMFUL OR FATAL IF

SWALLOWED - ASPIRATION HAZARD High fire hazard. Keep away from heat, spark, open flame, and other ignition sources.

If ingested, do NOT induce vomiting, as this may cause chemical pneumonia (fluid in the lungs). Contact may cause eye, skin and mucous membrane irritation. Harmful if absorbed through the skin. Avoid prolonged breathing of vapors or mists. Inhalation may cause irritation, anesthetic effects (dizziness, nausea, headache, intoxication), and respiratory system effects.

Long-term exposure may cause effects to specific organs, such as to the liver, kidneys, blood, nervous system, and skin. Contains benzene, which can cause blood disease, including anemia and leukemia.

1. CHEMICAL PRODUCT and COMPANY INFORMATION

Hess Corporation 1 Hess Plaza Woodbridge, NJ 07095-0961

EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBER (24 hrs): CHEMTREC (800)424-9300 COMPANY CONTACT (business hours): Corporate Safety (732)750-6000 MSDS (Environment, Health, Safety) Internet Website www.hess.com

SYNONYMS: Hess Conventional (Oxygenated and Non-oxygenated) Gasoline; Reformulated Gasoline (RFG); Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygenate Blending (RBOB); Unleaded Motor or Automotive Gasoline

See Section 16 for abbreviations and acronyms.

2. COMPOSITION and INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS *

INGREDIENT NAME (CAS No.) CONCENTRATION PERCENT BY WEIGHT Gasoline (86290-81-5) 100 Benzene (71-43-2) 0.1 - 4.9 (0.1 - 1.3 reformulated gasoline) n-Butane (106-97-8) < 10 Ethyl Alcohol (Ethanol) (64-17-5) 0 - 10 Ethyl benzene (100-41-4) < 3 n-Hexane (110-54-3) 0.5 to 4 Methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) (1634-04-4) 0 to 15.0 Tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME) (994-05-8) 0 to 17.2 Toluene (108-88-3) 1 - 25 1,2,4- Trimethylbenzene (95-63-6) < 6 Xylene, mixed isomers (1330-20-7) 1 - 15 A complex blend of petroleum-derived normal and branched-chain alkane, cycloalkane, alkene, and aromatic hydrocarbons. May contain antioxidant and multifunctional additives. Non-oxygenated Conventional Gasoline and RBOB do not have oxygenates (Ethanol or MTBE and/or TAME).




Oxygenated Conventional and Reformulated Gasoline will have oxygenates for octane enhancement or as legally required.

3. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION

EYES Moderate irritant. Contact with liquid or vapor may cause irritation.

SKIN Practically non-toxic if absorbed following acute (single) exposure. May cause skin irritation with prolonged or repeated contact. Liquid may be absorbed through the skin in toxic amounts if large areas of skin are exposed repeatedly.

INGESTION The major health threat of ingestion occurs from the danger of aspiration (breathing) of liquid drops into the lungs, particularly from vomiting. Aspiration may result in chemical pneumonia (fluid in the lungs), severe lung damage, respiratory failure and even death.

Ingestion may cause gastrointestinal disturbances, including irritation, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, and central nervous system (brain) effects similar to alcohol intoxication. In severe cases, tremors, convulsions, loss of consciousness, coma, respiratory arrest, and death may occur.

INHALATION Excessive exposure may cause irritations to the nose, throat, lungs and respiratory tract. Central nervous system (brain) effects may include headache, dizziness, loss of balance and coordination, unconsciousness, coma, respiratory failure, and death.

WARNING: the burning of any hydrocarbon as a fuel in an area without adequate ventilation may result in hazardous levels of combustion products, including carbon monoxide, and inadequate oxygen levels, which may cause unconsciousness, suffocation, and death.

CHRONIC EFFECTS and CARCINOGENICITY Contains benzene, a regulated human carcinogen. Benzene has the potential to cause anemia and other blood diseases, including leukemia, after repeated and prolonged exposure. Exposure to light hydrocarbons in the same boiling range as this product has been associated in animal studies with systemic toxicity. See also Section 11 - Toxicological Information.

MEDICAL CONDITIONS AGGRAVATED BY EXPOSURE Irritation from skin exposure may aggravate existing open wounds, skin disorders, and dermatitis (rash). Chronic respiratory disease, liver or kidney dysfunction, or pre-existing central nervous system disorders may be aggravated by exposure.

4. FIRST AID MEASURES EYES In case of contact with eyes, immediately flush with clean, low-pressure water for at least 15 min. Hold eyelids open to ensure adequate flushing. Seek medical attention.

SKIN Remove contaminated clothing. Wash contaminated areas thoroughly with soap and water or waterless hand cleanser. Obtain medical attention if irritation or redness develops.

INGESTION




DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING. Do not give liquids. Obtain immediate medical attention. If spontaneous vomiting occurs, lean victim forward to reduce the risk of aspiration. Small amounts of material which enter the mouth should be rinsed out until the taste is dissipated.

INHALATION Remove person to fresh air. If person is not breathing, ensure an open airway and provide artificial respiration. If necessary, provide additional oxygen once breathing is restored if trained to do so. Seek medical attention immediately.

5. FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES FLAMMABLE PROPERTIES: FLASH POINT: -45 oF (-43oC) AUTOIGNITION TEMPERATURE: highly variable; > 530 oF (>280 oC) OSHA/NFPA FLAMMABILITY CLASS: 1A (flammable liquid) LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT (%): 1.4% UPPER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT (%): 7.6%

FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS Vapors may be ignited rapidly when exposed to heat, spark, open flame or other source of ignition. Flowing product may be ignited by self-generated static electricity. When mixed with air and exposed to an ignition source, flammable vapors can burn in the open or explode in confined spaces. Being heavier than air, vapors may travel long distances to an ignition source and flash back. Runoff to sewer may cause fire or explosion hazard.

EXTINGUISHING MEDIA SMALL FIRES: Any extinguisher suitable for Class B fires, dry chemical, CO2, water spray, fire fighting foam, or Halon.

LARGE FIRES: Water spray, fog or fire fighting foam. Water may be ineffective for fighting the fire, but may be used to cool fire-exposed containers.

During certain times of the year and/or in certain geographical locations, gasoline may contain MTBE and/or TAME. Firefighting foam suitable for polar solvents is recommended for fuel with greater than 10% oxygenate concentration - refer to NFPA 11 “Low Expansion Foam - 1994 Edition.”

FIRE FIGHTING INSTRUCTIONS Small fires in the incipient (beginning) stage may typically be extinguished using handheld portable fire extinguishers and other fire fighting equipment.

Firefighting activities that may result in potential exposure to high heat, smoke or toxic by-products of combustion should require NIOSH/MSHA- approved pressure-demand self-contained breathing apparatus with full facepiece and full protective clothing.

Isolate area around container involved in fire. Cool tanks, shells, and containers exposed to fire and excessive heat with water. For massive fires the use of unmanned hose holders or monitor nozzles may be advantageous to further minimize personnel exposure. Major fires may require withdrawal, allowing the tank to burn. Large storage tank fires typically require specially trained personnel and equipment to extinguish the fire, often including the need for properly applied fire fighting foam.

See Section 16 for the NFPA 704 Hazard Rating.




6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES ACTIVATE FACILITY SPILL CONTINGENCY or EMERGENCY PLAN.

Evacuate nonessential personnel and remove or secure all ignition sources. Consider wind direction; stay upwind and uphill, if possible. Evaluate the direction of product travel, diking, sewers, etc. to confirm spill areas. Spills may infiltrate subsurface soil and groundwater; professional assistance may be necessary to determine the extent of subsurface impact.

Carefully contain and stop the source of the spill, if safe to do so. Protect bodies of water by diking, absorbents, or absorbent boom, if possible. Do not flush down sewer or drainage systems, unless system is designed and permitted to handle such material. The use of fire fighting foam may be useful in certain situations to reduce vapors. The proper use of water spray may effectively disperse product vapors or the liquid itself, preventing contact with ignition sources or areas/equipment that require protection.

Take up with sand or other oil absorbing materials. Carefully shovel, scoop or sweep up into a waste container for reclamation or disposal - caution, flammable vapors may accumulate in closed containers. Response and clean-up crews must be properly trained and must utilize proper protective equipment (see Section 8).

7. HANDLING and STORAGE HANDLING PRECAUTIONS

******USE ONLY AS A MOTOR FUEL****** ******DO NOT SIPHON BY MOUTH******

Handle as a flammable liquid. Keep away from heat, sparks, and open flame! Electrical equipment should be approved for classified area. Bond and ground containers during product transfer to reduce the possibility of static-initiated fire or explosion.

Special slow load procedures for "switch loading" must be followed to avoid the static ignition hazard that can exist when higher flash point material (such as fuel oil) is loaded into tanks previously containing low flash point products (such as this product) - see API Publication 2003, "Protection Against Ignitions Arising Out Of Static, Lightning and Stray Currents.

STORAGE PRECAUTIONS Keep away from flame, sparks, excessive temperatures and open flame. Use approved vented containers. Keep containers closed and clearly labeled. Empty product containers or vessels may contain explosive vapors. Do not pressurize, cut, heat, weld or expose such containers to sources of ignition.

Store in a well-ventilated area. This storage area should comply with NFPA 30 "Flammable and Combustible Liquid Code". Avoid storage near incompatible materials. The cleaning of tanks previously containing this product should follow API Recommended Practice (RP) 2013 "Cleaning Mobile Tanks In Flammable and Combustible Liquid Service" and API RP 2015 "Cleaning Petroleum Storage Tanks".

WORK/HYGIENIC PRACTICES Emergency eye wash capability should be available in the near proximity to operations presenting a potential splash exposure. Use good personal hygiene practices. Avoid repeated and/or prolonged skin exposure. Wash hands before eating, drinking, smoking, or using toilet facilities. Do not use as a cleaning solvent on the skin. Do not use solvents or harsh abrasive skin cleaners for washing this product from exposed skin areas. Waterless hand cleaners are effective. Promptly remove contaminated clothing and launder before reuse. Use care when laundering to prevent the formation of flammable vapors which could ignite via washer or dryer. Consider the need to discard contaminated leather shoes and gloves.




8. EXPOSURE CONTROLS and PERSONAL PROTECTION EXPOSURE LIMITS

Component (CAS No.) Exposure Limits Source TWA

(ppm) STEL (ppm)

Note

Gasoline (86290-81-5) ACGIH 300 500 A3 Benzene (71-43-2) OSHA

ACGIH USCG

1 0.5 1

5 2.5 5

Carcinogen A1, skin

n-Butane (106-97-8) ACGIH 1000 -- Aliphatic Hydrocarbon Gases Alkane (C1-C4) Ethyl Alcohol (ethanol) (64-17-5) OSHA

ACGIH 1000 1000

-- --

A4

Ethyl benzene (100-41-4) OSHA ACGIH

100 100

-- 125

A3

n-Hexane (110-54-3) OSHA ACGIH

500 50

-- --

Skin

Methyl-tertiary butyl ether [MTBE] (1634-04-4) ACGIH 50 A3 Tertiary-amyl methyl ether [TAME] (994-05-8) None established Toluene (108-88-3) OSHA

ACGIH 200 20

--

Ceiling: 300 ppm; Peak: 500 ppm (10 min.) A4

1,2,4- Trimethylbenzene (95-63-6) ACGIH 25 -- Xylene, mixed isomers (1330-20-7) OSHA

ACGIH 100 100

-- 150

A4

ENGINEERING CONTROLS Use adequate ventilation to keep vapor concentrations of this product below occupational exposure and flammability limits, particularly in confined spaces.

EYE/FACE PROTECTION Safety glasses or goggles are recommended where there is a possibility of splashing or spraying.

SKIN PROTECTION Gloves constructed of nitrile or neoprene are recommended. Chemical protective clothing such as that made of of E.I. DuPont Tychem ®, products or equivalent is recommended based on degree of exposure.

Note: The resistance of specific material may vary from product to product as well as with degree of exposure. Consult manufacturer specifications for further information.

RESPIRATORY PROTECTION A NIOSH-approved air-purifying respirator with organic vapor cartridges or canister may be permissible under certain circumstances where airborne concentrations are or may be expected to exceed exposure limits or for odor or irritation. Protection provided by air-purifying respirators is limited. Refer to OSHA 29 CFR 1910.134, NIOSH Respirator Decision Logic, and the manufacturer for additional guidance on respiratory protection selection and limitations.

Use a positive pressure, air-supplied respirator if there is a potential for uncontrolled release, exposure levels are not known, in oxygen-deficient atmospheres, or any other circumstance where an air-purifying respirator may not provide adequate protection.

9. PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL PROPERTIES APPEARANCE A translucent, straw-colored or light yellow liquid




ODOR A strong, characteristic aromatic hydrocarbon odor. Oxygenated gasoline with MTBE and/or TAME may have a sweet, ether-like odor and is detectable at a lower concentration than non-oxygenated gasoline.

ODOR THRESHOLD Odor Detection Odor Recognition Non-oxygenated gasoline: 0.5 - 0.6 ppm 0.8 - 1.1 ppm Gasoline with 15% MTBE: 0.2 - 0.3 ppm 0.4 - 0.7 ppm Gasoline with 15% TAME: 0.1 ppm 0.2 ppm

BASIC PHYSICAL PROPERTIES BOILING RANGE: 85 to 437 oF (39 to 200 oC) VAPOR PRESSURE: 6.4 - 15 RVP @ 100 oF (38 oC) (275-475 mm Hg @ 68 oF (20 oC) VAPOR DENSITY (air = 1): AP 3 to 4 SPECIFIC GRAVITY (H2O = 1): 0.70 – 0.78 EVAPORATION RATE: 10-11 (n-butyl acetate = 1) PERCENT VOLATILES: 100 % SOLUBILITY (H2O): Non-oxygenated gasoline - negligible (< 0.1% @ 77 oF). Gasoline with 15%

MTBE - slight (0.1 - 3% @ 77 oF); ethanol is readily soluble in water

10. STABILITY and REACTIVITY ) STABILITY: Stable. Hazardous polymerization will not occur.

CONDITIONS TO AVOID Avoid high temperatures, open flames, sparks, welding, smoking and other ignition sources

INCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS Keep away from strong oxidizers.

HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS Carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and non-combusted hydrocarbons (smoke). Contact with nitric and sulfuric acids will form nitrocresols that can decompose violently.

11. TOXICOLOGICAL PROPERTIES ACUTE TOXICITY Acute Dermal LD50 (rabbits): > 5 ml/kg Acute Oral LD50 (rat): 18.75 ml/kg Primary dermal irritation (rabbits): slightly irritating Draize eye irritation (rabbits): non-irritating Guinea pig sensitization: negative

CHRONIC EFFECTS AND CARCINOGENICITY Carcinogenicity: OSHA: NO IARC: YES - 2B NTP: NO ACGIH: YES (A3)

IARC has determined that gasoline and gasoline exhaust are possibly carcinogenic in humans. Inhalation exposure to completely vaporized unleaded gasoline caused kidney cancers in male rats and liver tumors in female mice. The U.S. EPA has determined that the male kidney tumors are species-specific and are irrelevant for human health risk assessment. The significance of the tumors seen in female mice is not known. Exposure to light hydrocarbons in the same boiling range as this product has been associated in animal studies with effects to the central and peripheral nervous systems, liver, and kidneys. The significance of these animal models to predict similar human response to gasoline is uncertain.

This product contains benzene. Human health studies indicate that prolonged and/or repeated overexposure to benzene may cause damage to the blood-forming system (particularly bone marrow), and serious blood disorders such as aplastic anemia and leukemia. Benzene is listed as a human carcinogen by the NTP, IARC, OSHA and ACGIH.




This product may contain methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE ): animal and human health effects studies indicate that MTBE may cause eye, skin, and respiratory tract irritation, central nervous system depression and neurotoxicity. MTBE is classified as an animal carcinogen (A3) by the ACGIH.

12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION Keep out of sewers, drainage areas and waterways. Report spills and releases, as applicable, under Federal and State regulations. If released, oxygenates such as ethers and alcohols will be expected to exhibit fairly high mobility in soil, and therefore may leach into groundwater. The API (www.api.org) provides a number of useful references addressing petroleum and oxygenate contamination of groundwater.

13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS Consult federal, state and local waste regulations to determine appropriate disposal options.

14. TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION DOT PROPER SHIPPING NAME: Gasoline DOT HAZARD CLASS and PACKING GROUP: 3, PG II DOT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: UN 1203 DOT SHIPPING LABEL:

FLAMMABLE LIQUID

PLACARD:

15. REGULATORY INFORMATION U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, and LOCAL REGULATORY INFORMATION This product and its constituents listed herein are on the EPA TSCA Inventory. Any spill or uncontrolled release of this product, including any substantial threat of release, may be subject to federal, state and/or local reporting requirements. This product and/or its constituents may also be subject to other federal, state, or local regulations; consult those regulations applicable to your facility/operation.

CLEAN WATER ACT (OIL SPILLS) Any spill or release of this product to "navigable waters" (essentially any surface water, including certain wetlands) or adjoining shorelines sufficient to cause a visible sheen or deposit of a sludge or emulsion must be reported immediately to the National Response Center (1-800-424-8802) as required by U.S. Federal Law. Also contact appropriate state and local regulatory agencies as required.

CERCLA SECTION 103 and SARA SECTION 304 (RELEASE TO THE ENVIRONMENT) The CERCLA definition of hazardous substances contains a “petroleum exclusion” clause which exempts crude oil, refined, and unrefined petroleum products and any indigenous components of such. However, other federal reporting requirements (e.g., SARA Section 304 as well as the Clean Water Act if the spill occurs on navigable waters) may still apply.

SARA SECTION 311/312 - HAZARD CLASSES ACUTE HEALTH CHRONIC HEALTH FIRE SUDDEN RELEASE OF PRESSURE REACTIVE

X X X -- --

SARA SECTION 313 - SUPPLIER NOTIFICATION This product contains the following toxic chemicals subject to the reporting requirements of section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986 and of 40 CFR 372:

INGREDIENT NAME (CAS NUMBER) CONCENTRATION WT. PERCENT Benzene (71-43-2) 0.1 to 4.9 (0.1 to 1.3 for reformulated gasoline)

Ethyl benzene (100-41-4) < 3




n-Hexane (110-54-3) 0.5 to 4

Methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) (1634-04-4) 0 to 15.0

Toluene (108-88-3) 1 to 15

1,2,4- Trimethylbenzene (95-63-6) < 6

Xylene, mixed isomers (1330-20-7) 1 to 15

US EPA guidance documents (www.epa.gov/tri) for reporting Persistent Bioaccumulating Toxics (PBTs) indicate this product may contain the following deminimis levels of toxic chemicals subject to Section 313 reporting:

INGREDIENT NAME (CAS NUMBER) CONCENTRATION - Parts per million (ppm) by weight Polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) Benzo (g,h,i) perylene (191-24-2) Lead (7439-92-1)

17 2.55 0.079

CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65 LIST OF CHEMICALS This product contains the following chemicals that are included on the Proposition 65 “List of Chemicals” required by the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986:

INGREDIENT NAME (CAS NUMBER) Date Listed Benzene 2/27/1987 Ethyl benzene 6/11/2004 Toluene 1/1/1991 CANADIAN REGULATORY INFORMATION (WHMIS) Class B, Division 2 (Flammable Liquid) Class D, Division 2A (Very toxic by other means) and Class D, Division 2B (Toxic by other means)

16. OTHER INFORMATION NFPA® HAZARD RATING HEALTH: 1 Slight FIRE: 3 Serious REACTIVITY: 0 Minimal

HMIS® HAZARD RATING HEALTH: 1 * Slight FIRE: 3 Serious PHYSICAL: 0 Minimal * CHRONIC

SUPERSEDES MSDS DATED: 07/01/06

ABBREVIATIONS: AP = Approximately < = Less than > = Greater than N/A = Not Applicable N/D = Not Determined ppm = parts per million

ACRONYMS: ACGIH American Conference of Governmental

Industrial Hygienists AIHA American Industrial Hygiene Association ANSI American National Standards Institute

(212)642-4900 API American Petroleum Institute

(202)682-8000

CERCLA Comprehensive Emergency Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

DOT U.S. Department of Transportation [General Info: (800)467-4922]

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency HMIS Hazardous Materials Information System




IARC International Agency For Research On Cancer

MSHA Mine Safety and Health Administration NFPA National Fire Protection Association

(617)770-3000 NIOSH National Institute of Occupational Safety

and Health NOIC Notice of Intended Change (proposed

change to ACGIH TLV) NTP National Toxicology Program OPA Oil Pollution Act of 1990 OSHA U.S. Occupational Safety & Health

Administration PEL Permissible Exposure Limit (OSHA) RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

REL Recommended Exposure Limit (NIOSH) SARA Superfund Amendments and

Reauthorization Act of 1986 Title III SCBA Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus SPCC Spill Prevention, Control, and

Countermeasures STEL Short-Term Exposure Limit (generally 15

minutes) TLV Threshold Limit Value (ACGIH) TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TWA Time Weighted Average (8 hr.) WEEL Workplace Environmental Exposure

Level (AIHA) WHMIS Workplace Hazardous Materials

Information System (Canada)

DISCLAIMER OF EXPRESSED AND IMPLIED WARRANTIES

Information presented herein has been compiled from sources considered to be dependable, and is accurate and reliable to the best of our knowledge and belief, but is not guaranteed to be so. Since conditions of use are beyond our control, we make no warranties, expressed or implied, except those that may be contained in our written contract of sale or acknowledgment.

Vendor assumes no responsibility for injury to vendee or third persons proximately caused by the material if reasonable safety procedures are not adhered to as stipulated in the data sheet. Additionally, vendor assumes no responsibility for injury to vendee or third persons proximately caused by abnormal use of the material, even if reasonable safety procedures are followed. Furthermore, vendee assumes the risk in their use of the material.

Material Safety Data Sheet

SECTION I - Material Identity SECTION II - Manufacturer's Information SECTION III - Physical/Chemical Characteristics SECTION IV - Fire and Explosion Hazard Data SECTION V - Reactivity Data SECTION VI - Health Hazard Data SECTION VII - Precautions for Safe Handling and Use SECTION VIII - Control Measures SECTION IX - Label Data SECTION X - Transportation Data SECTION XI - Site Specific/Reporting Information SECTION XII - Ingredients/Identity Information

SECTION I - Material Identity

SECTION II - Manufacturer's Information

MSDS Preparer's Information

Item Name

Part Number/Trade Name LUBRIPLATE HYDRAULIC OIL, SPECIAL LOW (SUPP

National Stock Number 9150L400652F

CAGE Code 73219

Part Number Indicator A

MSDS Number 184027

HAZ Code B

Manufacturer Name FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO

Street 129 LOCKWOOD ST

City NEWARK

State NJ

Country US

Zip Code 07105

Emergency Phone 201-589-9150

Information Phone 201-589-9150

MSDS Preparer Name ROBERT J. SIBILIA

Date MSDS Prepared/Revised 01JUL90

Date of Technical Review 10SEP92

Active Indicator N

Page 1 of 4LUBRIPLATE HYDRAULIC OIL, SPECIAL LOW (SUPP

10/24/2012file://\\langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2012-10 OER Phase II RIWP\Appendix ...

Alternate Vendors

SECTION III - Physical/Chemical Characteristics

SECTION IV - Fire and Explosion Hazard Data

SECTION V - Reactivity Data

Vendor #5 CAGE BPXSL

Hazard Storage Compatibility Code N1

Appearance/Odor TRANSPARENT AMBER OIL WITH MINERAL OIL ODOR

Boiling Point >550F,>288C

Melting Point LIQUID

Vapor Pressure <0.01

Vapor Density >5

Specific Gravity 0.87

Decomposition Temperature N/K

Evaporation Rate <0.01 (BUTYL ACETATE=1)

Solubility in Water NEGLIGIBLE

Percent Volatiles by Volume N/K

Chemical pH N/K

Corrosion Rate N/K

Container Pressure Code 4

Temperature Code 8

Product State Code U

Flash Point 315

Flash Point Method COC

Lower Explosion Limit 0.9%

Upper Explosion Limit 7%

Extinguishing Media FOAM, DRY CHEMICAL, CARBON DIOXIDE OR WATER

SPRAY(FOG)

Special Fire Fighting Procedures WEAR NIOSH/MSHA APPROVED SCBA AND FULL

PROTECTIVEEQUIPMENT (FP N). COOL EXPOSED

CONTAINERS WITH WATER

Unusual Fire/Explosion Hazards DO NOT STORE OR MIX WITH STRONG OXIDANTS.

EMPTY CONTAINERS RETAIN RESIDUE. DO NOT CUT,

DRILL, GRIND OR WELD AS THEY MAYEXPLODE

Stability YES

Stability Conditions to Avoid NOT APPLICABLE

Materials to Avoid AVOID CONTACT WITH STRONG OXIDANTS LIKE

LIQUID CHLORINE, CONCENTRATED OXYGEN

Hazardous Decomposition Products MAY FORM SO*2. IF INCOMPLETE COMBUSTION,

CARBON MONOXIDE

Hazardous Polymerization NO

Polymerization Conditions to Avoid NOT RELEVANT

LD50 - LD50 Mixture NONE SPECIFIED BY MANUFACTURER



SECTION VI - Health Hazard Data

SECTION VII - Precautions for Safe Handling and Use

SECTION VIII - Control Measures

Route of Entry: Skin NO

Route of Entry: Ingestion YES

Route of Entry: Inhalation YES

Health Hazards - Acute and Chronic PRLNGD/RPTD SKIN CONT MAY CAUSE IRRIT.PRDCT

CONTACTING EYES MAY CAUSE IRRIT. HUMAN HLTH

RISKS VARY FROM PERS TO PERS. AS A PREC,

EXPOS TO LIQS, VAPS, MISTS & FUMES SHLD BE

MINIMIZED. PROD HAS LOW ORDER OF ACUTE ORAL

TOX, BUT MINUTE AMTS ASPIRATED INTO LUNGS

DURING INGEST MAY CAUSE MILD TO SEVERE

PULMONARY INJURY

Carcinogenity: NTP NO

Carcinogenity: IARC NO

Carcinogenity: OSHA NO

Explanation of Carcinogenity NOT RELEVANT

Symptoms of Overexposure SEE HEALTH HAZARDS

Medical Cond. Aggrevated by Exposure NONE SPECIFIED BY MANUFACTURER

Emergency/First Aid Procedures EYE:FLUSH W/CLEAR WATER FOR @ LST 15

MIN/UNTIL IRRIT SUBSIDES.IF IRRIT PERSISTS,

CONSULT MD. SKIN:REMOVE ANY CONTAMD CLTHG

&WASH THORO W/SOAP & WARM WATER. INHAL:VAP

PRESS IS VERY LOW & INHAL @ ROOMTEMP IS NOT

A PROBLEM.IF OVERCOME BY VAP FROM HOT PROD,

IMMED MOVE FROM EXPOS & CALL MD. IF

OVEREXPOS TO OIL MIST, REMOVE FROM FURTHER

EXPOS UNTIL EXCESSIVE OIL MIST CONDITION

SUBSIDES. (SUPP DATA)

Steps if Material Released/Spilled RECOVER LIQUID, WASH REMAINDER WITH SUITABLE

PETROLEUM SOLVENT OR ADD ABSORBENT. KEEP

PETROLEUM PRODUCTS OUT OF SEWERS AND WATER

COURSES. ADVISE AUTHORITIES IF PRODUCT HAS

ENTERED OR MAY ENTER SEWERS AND

WATERCOURSES

Neutralizing Agent NONE SPECIFIED BY MANUFACTURER

Waste Disposal Method ASSURE CONFORMITY WITH APPLICABLE DISPOSAL

REGULATIONS. DISPOSE OF ABSORBED MATERIAL AT

AN APPROVED WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITY OR SITE.

DISPOSE I/A/W FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL

REGULATIONS (FP N)

Handling and Storage Precautions KEEP CONTAINERS CLOSED WHEN NOT IN USE. DO

NOT HANDLE OR STORE NEAR HEAT, SPARKS, FLAME

OR STRONG OXIDANTS

Other Precautions AVOID BREATHING OIL MIST. REMOVE OIL-SOAKED

CLOTHING AND LAUNDER BEFORE RESUE

Respiratory Protection NORMALLY NOT NEEDED. NIOSH/MSHA APPROVED



SECTION IX - Label Data

SECTION X - Transportation Data

SECTION XI - Site Specific/Reporting Information

SECTION XII - Ingredients/Identity Information

RESPIRATOR APPROPRIATE FOR EXPOSURE OF

CONCERN (FP N)

Ventilation LOCAL EXHAUST: USED TO CAPTURE FUMES AND

VAPORS

Protective Gloves USE OIL-RESISTANT GLOVES, IF NEEDED

Eye Protection CHEMICAL WORKERS GOGGLES (FP N)

Other Protective Equipment USE OIL-RESISTANT APRON, IF NEEDED

Work Hygenic Practices CLEANSE SKIN THOROUGHLY AFTER CONTACT

Supplemental Health/Safety Data MFR'S TRADE NAME/PART NO: POUR, MINUS 70,

MV-HO. FIRST AID PROC: INGEST: IF INGESTED,

CALL MD IMMEDIATELY. DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING

Protect Eye NO

Protect Skin NO

Protect Respiratory NO

Chronic Indicator UNKNOWN

Contact Code UNKNOWN

Fire Code UNKNOWN

Health Code UNKNOWN

React Code UNKNOWN

Container Quantity 1

Unit of Measure GL

Volatile Organic Compounds (P/G) 0

Volatile Organic Compounds (G/L) 0

Ingredient # 01

Ingredient Name OIL, HYDRAULIC (MIST); (OIL MIST)

CAS Number 1003

NIOSH Number 1005034OH

Proprietary NO

Percent 0

OSHA PEL 5 MG/M3

ACGIH TLV 5 MG/M3;10 STEL

Recommended Limit N/K



ATTACHMENT B

Field Change Authorization Request Form

LANGAN EHS PLAN FIELD CHANGE AUTHORIZATION REQUEST FORM

PROJECT: _______________________________________________________________________

PROJECT LOCATION:_____________________________________________________________

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE:

REASON FOR CHANGE:

RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION:

APPROVALS

PROJECT MANAGER:

Signature Date

PROJECT SITE SAFETY OFFICER:

Signature Date

CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE:

Signature Date

DISTRIBUTION: Langan SSO

Langan Site Supervisor

Langan Project Manager

Client Project Manager

FIELD CHANGE RECORDS

Record of Field Changes:

Initial for attaching any Field changes to this EHS Plan. Enter the Field Change Number and

Date Issued. File the completed field changes to this EHS Plan at the end as attachments.

Make PEN and INK changes in the text to alert the reader to the changes that are required in

the Field Change.

FIELD CHANGE

NUMBER

DATE ENTERED SYNOPSIS OF CHANGE INITIAL

\\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013207 2 OER Phase II RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Appendix D 2 HASP\Attachment B 2 Field Change\Field Change

Authorization Forms.doc

ATTACHMENT C

Accident / Incident Report Form

LANGAN ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT FORM

Page 1 of 2

Project Name:

Injured or Ill Employee

1. Name Social Security #

(First) (Middle) (Last)

2. Home Address

(No. and Street) (City or Town) (State, Zip)

3. Age _____

4. Sex: Male ( ) Female ( )

5. Occupation

(Specific job title, not the specific activity employee was performing at time of injury)

6. Department

(Enter name of department in which injured person is employed, even though they

may have been temporarily working in another department at the time of injury)

Employer

7. Name

8. Mailing Address


9. Location (if different from mailing address):

THE ACCIDENT OR EXPOSURE TO OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS

10. Place of accident or exposure


11. Was place of accident or exposure on employer's premises? (Yes / No)

12. What was the employee doing when injured?

(Be specific ? was employee using tools or equipment or handling material?)

13. How did the accident occur?

(Describe fully the events that resulted in the injury or

occupational illness. Tell what happened and how. Name objects and substances involved.

Give details on all factors that led to accident. Use separate sheet if needed)

LANGAN ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT FORM

Page 2 of 2

14. Time of accident: ________________

15. Date of injury or initial diagnosis of occupational illness _____________________________

(Date)

16. WITNESS

TO ACCIDENT (Name) (Affiliation) (Phone No.)

(Name) (Affiliation) (Phone No.)

(Name) (Affiliation) (Phone No.)

Occupational Injury/Illness

17. Describe the injury or illness in detail; indicate part of body affected.

18. Name the object or substance that directly injured the employee. (For example, object that struck

employee; the vapor or poison inhaled or swallowed; the chemical or radiation that irritated the

skin; or in cases of strains, hernias, etc., the object the employee was lifting, pulling, etc.)

19. Did the accident result in employee fatality? ________ (Yes or No)

20. Number of lost workdays ____/restricted workdays _____ resulting from injury

or illness?

Other

21. Did you see a physician for treatment? ________ (Yes or No) ________ (Date)

22. Name and address of physician

(No. and Street) (City or Town) (State and Zip)

23. If hospitalized, name and address of hospital

(No. and Street) (City or Town) (State and Zip)

Date of report ___________________ Prepared by

Official position ___________________________

\\Langan.com\data\EP\data5\100287501\Engineering Data\Environmental\Reports\2013?07 ? OER Phase II RIWP REVISED (365 Bond Street)\Appendix D ? HASP\Attachment C ? Accident Forms\Langan

Accident Report Form.doc

ATTACHMENT D

Emergency Notification List

\\LANGAN.COM\DATA\EP\DATA5\100287501\ENGINEERING DATA\ENVIRONMENTAL\REPORTS\2013�07 � OER PHASE II RIWP REVISED (365 BOND STREET)\APPENDIX D �

HASP\ATTACHMENT D � EMERGENCY CONTACTS\HASP�EMERGENCY CONTACTS.DOC

ATTACHMENT D

EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION NUMBERS

The following list provides names and telephone numbers for emergency contact personnel.

ORGANIZATION

CONTACT

TELEPHONE

New York City Police 911

New York City Fire 911

New York Downtown Hospital 212�348�2210

Langan Project Managers Chris McMahon

Steven Ciambruschini

201�794�6900 /

201�218�2339

201�398�4549 /

201�410�9238

National Response Center 800�424�8802

Center for Disease Control 404�488�4100

CHEMTREC 800�424�9300

TSCA HOTLINE 202�554�1404

RCRA HOTLINE 800�424�9346

CDC (DAY)

(NIGHT)

404�452�4100

404�329�2888

BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO & FIREARMS 800�424�9555

202�566�7777

NATIONAL RESPONSE CENTER 800�424�8802

PESTICIDE INFORMATION SERVICE 800�424�9346

BUREAU OF EXPLOSIVES, A.A. RAILWAYS 202�835�9500

FEDERAL EXPRESS � HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INFO 901�922�1666

REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN for

Documents

Transcript of REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN for