United States Immigration and Immigration Policies, Colonial Times to Present.
Religions and immigration in the United States
1
EDITORIAL n all countries, the number of people counted as members of various religions evolves according to the number of individu- als who claim their membership in a certain religion and those who distance themselves from a religion. In the United States this type of evolution is particularly dependent on immigration, which causes important changes in the repartition of the religious population. In considering the religious repartition in the most popu- lous country of America, the Christian religion continues to dominate, since three-quarters of the U.S. population con- sider themselves “Christian”, while 15% declare “without religion”, 3.9% declare a “non-Christian religion”, 5.2 give “no reponse” 1 . However, within the Christian group, the evolution of vari- ous sub-groups shows marked differences. From 2001 to 2008, the number of Catholics increased by a percentage superior to the national demographic increase of adults (12.4% and 9.7% respectively), while the number of Protes- tants increased less than the national increase (7% versus 9.7% respectively). One element which explains this evolu- tion, favorable to the Catholics, is the Latin-American and Philippine immigrations, which are composed largely of Catholics. Within the category of Protestant religions, this migratory phenomenon also has an effect. (Other factors may also play a role, such as the abandoning of a religion, for the group indicating “without religion” increased by 13.6%.) In fact, along with certain Protestant religions (evangelical, Pentecostal and Adventist) and Jehovah’s Witnesses, which all increase their numbers chiefly by conversion, the rise in Orthodox Christians (27.8%) should be noted. This is the result mainly of immigration from the countries of Ortho- dox Europe, following the collapse of the Iron Curtain. On the contrary, the Lutherans (-9.5%), the Presbyterians (-15.6%), and the Anglicans (-30.3%) are all on the decrease, these religions being implanted in countries which furnish almost no more immigrants to the U.S., namely, Sweden, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Furthermore, in addition to the migratory phenomenon should be noted a higher-than-average birth rate among the Mennonites (26.6%) and the Mormons (17.1%). As for non-Christian religions, their members increased more (13.6%) than both the national increase and that of the Christian churches. Within this sub-category, sharp differences should also be noted: In effect, growth of the Sikhs from India is very high (36.8%) even though their actual numbers remain small (78,000 in 2008). The rise is less dramatic for the Muslims (22.2%), but their actual number is higher (1,349,000), due to immigrations com- ing in particular from the Indian subcontinent, from the Middle East (in particular Lebanon) and the Muslim countries of sub-Saharan Africa, for example, Senegal 2 . The number of Buddhists showed an increase (9.9%) just slightly above the national increase, but with an impor- tant minority, with 1,189,000 members. On the contrary, the number of Jews diminishes (-5.5%) to stabilize at 2,680,000 in 2008. It is true that the large waves of Jew- ish immigration to the United States, a result of the pogroms of the late 19th and early 20th centuries in Europe, then the Shoah, and finally the expulsion of the Jews from the Arab countries, such as Egypt in 1956, are finished. On the other hand, American Jews can make their aliya (ascension), that is, emigrate to Israel, an emi- gration which has been greatly facilitated by the Law of Return voted in 1950 by Israel and which gives all Jews the right to immigrate to Israel and to become citizens. Thus, an analysis of religions in the United States sheds some light on the migratory system of this country. Note- worthy is the fact that the Chinese immigration is not shown ; on the one hand it may be that this immigration has been divided among various religions and, on the other hand, 11.2 million inhabitants of the United States chose not to answer the question. (translation: C. Knutson-Beveraggi) by Gérard-François DUMONT EDITORIAL I Religions and Immigration in the United States Population & Avenir • no. 706 • January-february 2012 1. The ARIS Survey, concerned with the adult population, is based on declarations made by respondents themselves, and not on figures given by the religious groups. The survey studies 32 types of Christians, 11 non-Christian religions and 5 types of individuals without religion. Surprisingly, the sur- vey classes all Muslims in one category without distingui- shing, for example, Sunnis from Shi’ites. 2. Dumont, Gérard-François, Seydou Kanté, “Senegalese Immigration” (“L’émigration sénégalaise”) in : Morinaux, Vincent (editor), “Mobilities” (“Les mobilités”), Paris, Sedes, 2010. © Gérard-François Dumont - Enquête Aris 2008. No answer 5.2% No religion 15.0% Other religions 3.9% Other Christians 35.1% Baptists 15.8% Catholics 25.1% 1. the religious repartition of the U.S. population (Source : “Population and the Future” (“Population & Avenir”), n°. 706, January-February, 2012, www.population-demographie.org/revue03.htm; www.cairn.info/revue-population-et-avenir.htm)
-
Upload
gerard-francois-dumont -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
3
description
In any country, the number of religions evolve according to the number of people who identify with the various religions and the number of people who deviate. In the United States, this type of evolution is particularly dependent on immigration resulting in significant changes in the religious distribution of the population.
Transcript of Religions and immigration in the United States
EDITORIAL
n all countries, the number of people counted as members of various religionsevolves according to the number of individu-als who claim their membership in a certain
religion and those who distance themselvesfrom a religion. In the United States this type of
evolution is particularly dependent on immigration,which causes important changes in the repartition of the religious population.
In considering the religious repartition in the most popu-lous country of America, the Christian religion continues todominate, since three-quarters of the U.S. population con-sider themselves “Christian”, while 15% declare “withoutreligion”, 3.9% declare a “non-Christian religion”, 5.2 give“no reponse”1.
However, within the Christian group, the evolution of vari-ous sub-groups shows marked differences. From 2001 to2008, the number of Catholics increased by a percentagesuperior to the national demographic increase of adults(12.4% and 9.7% respectively), while the number of Protes-tants increased less than the national increase (7% versus9.7% respectively). One element which explains this evolu-tion, favorable to the Catholics, is the Latin-American andPhilippine immigrations, which are composed largely ofCatholics.
Within the category of Protestant religions, this migratoryphenomenon also has an effect. (Other factors may alsoplay a role, such as the abandoning of a religion, for thegroup indicating “without religion” increased by 13.6%.) Infact, along with certain Protestant religions (evangelical,Pentecostal and Adventist) and Jehovah’s Witnesses, whichall increase their numbers chiefly by conversion, the rise inOrthodox Christians (27.8%) should be noted. This is theresult mainly of immigration from the countries of Ortho-dox Europe, following the collapse of the Iron Curtain. Onthe contrary, the Lutherans (-9.5%), the Presbyterians(-15.6%), and the Anglicans (-30.3%) are all on thedecrease, these religions being implanted in countrieswhich furnish almost no more immigrants to the U.S.,namely, Sweden, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
Furthermore, in addition to the migratory phenomenonshould be noted a higher-than-average birth rate amongthe Mennonites (26.6%) and the Mormons (17.1%).
As for non-Christian religions, their members increasedmore (13.6%) than both the national increase and that ofthe Christian churches. Within this sub-category, sharpdifferences should also be noted: In effect, growth of theSikhs from India is very high (36.8%) even though theiractual numbers remain small (78,000 in 2008). The riseis less dramatic for the Muslims (22.2%), but their actualnumber is higher (1,349,000), due to immigrations com-ing in particular from the Indian subcontinent, from theMiddle East (in particular Lebanon) and the Muslimcountries of sub-Saharan Africa, for example, Senegal2.The number of Buddhists showed an increase (9.9%) justslightly above the national increase, but with an impor-tant minority, with 1,189,000 members. On the contrary,the number of Jews diminishes (-5.5%) to stabilize at2,680,000 in 2008. It is true that the large waves of Jew-ish immigration to the United States, a result of thepogroms of the late 19th and early 20th centuries inEurope, then the Shoah, and finally the expulsion of theJews from the Arab countries, such as Egypt in 1956, arefinished. On the other hand, American Jews can maketheir aliya (ascension), that is, emigrate to Israel, an emi-gration which has been greatly facilitated by the Law ofReturn voted in 1950 by Israel and which gives all Jewsthe right to immigrate to Israel and to become citizens.
Thus, an analysis of religions in the United States shedssome light on the migratory system of this country. Note-worthy is the fact that the Chinese immigration is notshown ; on the one hand it may be that this immigrationhas been divided among various religions and, on theother hand, 11.2 million inhabitants of the United Stateschose not to answer the question.
(translation: C. Knutson-Beveraggi)
by Gérard-François DUMONT
EDITORIAL
IReligions and Immigration in the United States
P o p u l a t i o n & A v e n i r • n o . 7 0 6 • J a n u a r y - f e b r u a r y 2 0 1 2
1. The ARIS Survey, concernedwith the adult population, isbased on declarations madeby respondents themselves,and not on figures given by thereligious groups. The surveystudies 32 types of Christians,11 non-Christian religions and5 types of individuals withoutreligion. Surprisingly, the sur-vey classes all Muslims in onecategory without distingui-shing, for example, Sunnisfrom Shi’ites.
2. Dumont, Gérard-François,Seydou Kanté, “SenegaleseImmigration” (“L’émigrationsénégalaise”) in : Morinaux,Vincent (editor), “Mobilities”(“Les mobilités”), Paris, Sedes,2010.
© Gérard-Fran
çois Du
mont - Enq
uête Aris
200
8.
No answer5.2%
No religion15.0%
Other religions3.9%
Other Christians35.1%
Baptists15.8%
Catholics25.1%
1 . t h e r e l i g i o u s r e p a r t i t i o n o f t h e U . S . p o p u l a t i o n
(Source : “Population and the Future”(“Population & Avenir”), n°. 706, January-February, 2012,
www.population-demographie.org/revue03.htm;www.cairn.info/revue-population-et-avenir.htm)
