RELIABILITY OF DIAGNOSIS ABNORM – NORMS AND DIAGNOSIS #2 – LESSON #2.

5
RELIABILITY OF DIAGNOSIS ABNORM – NORMS AND DIAGNOSIS #2 – LESSON #2

Transcript of RELIABILITY OF DIAGNOSIS ABNORM – NORMS AND DIAGNOSIS #2 – LESSON #2.

Page 1: RELIABILITY OF DIAGNOSIS ABNORM – NORMS AND DIAGNOSIS #2 – LESSON #2.

RELIABILITY OF DIAGNOSISABNORM – NORMS AND DIAGNOSIS #2 – LESSON #2

Page 2: RELIABILITY OF DIAGNOSIS ABNORM – NORMS AND DIAGNOSIS #2 – LESSON #2.

RELIABILITY

• Whether the same disorder is diagnosed every time.

• Inter-rater reliability: whether different diagnosticians get the same diagnosis. ie. how objective the diagnostic criteria is.

• Test-retest: whether repeating the diagnosis will give a different result between each time.

Page 3: RELIABILITY OF DIAGNOSIS ABNORM – NORMS AND DIAGNOSIS #2 – LESSON #2.

COOPER ET AL. – NEW YORK LONDON DIAGNOSIS

• Description - An identical video clip of a patient was shown to psychiatrists from New York and London.

• Findings

• Psychiatrists from New York had a higher likelihood of diagnosing schizophrenia.

• Psychiatrists from London were more likely to diagnose mania or depression.

Page 4: RELIABILITY OF DIAGNOSIS ABNORM – NORMS AND DIAGNOSIS #2 – LESSON #2.

BECK – PSYCHIATRISTS AGREEMENT

• Description - Agreement between two psychiatrists on diagnosis for 153 patients was 54%.

• The was due to the vagueness in criteria for diagnosis and;

• The different process for diagnosis.

Page 5: RELIABILITY OF DIAGNOSIS ABNORM – NORMS AND DIAGNOSIS #2 – LESSON #2.

DI NARDO (1993):

• Two clinicians separately diagnosed 267 people seeking treatment for anxiety and stress disorders.

• They found higher reliability for obsessive compulsive disorder but lower reliability for major depression