Relative Status and Interdependent Effects in Consumer Behavior
description
Transcript of Relative Status and Interdependent Effects in Consumer Behavior
Relative Status and Relative Status and Interdependent Effects in Interdependent Effects in
Consumer BehaviorConsumer Behavior
Parfait GasanaParfait GasanaSociology & EconomicsSociology & Economics
University of North Carolina University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillat Chapel Hill
Preceptor: Dr. William Darity, Jr. Preceptor: Dr. William Darity, Jr.
ConsumerismConsumerism
The belief that increased material The belief that increased material goods will make everyone happier and goods will make everyone happier and better offbetter off
Consumption of goods and services Consumption of goods and services mean more than utility and enjoyment mean more than utility and enjoyment
Different Dimension: a social process Different Dimension: a social process as people interact across various as people interact across various institutions, relationships, and walks of institutions, relationships, and walks of lifelife
ImplicationsImplications Work-and-Spend Cycle; Decline in Work-and-Spend Cycle; Decline in
Leisure Leisure (Schor 1992)(Schor 1992) Declining Family Relations, Civic Declining Family Relations, Civic
Engagement, and Everyday Engagement, and Everyday Socializing Socializing (Schor 1998)(Schor 1998)
Deteriorating Family Finances Deteriorating Family Finances (Frank (Frank 1999)1999)
Threatened Natural Environment; Threatened Natural Environment; Ecological Devastation Ecological Devastation (Schor 1998(Schor 1998))
Private Affluence/Public Squalor Private Affluence/Public Squalor (Galbraith 1958)(Galbraith 1958)
ExplanationsExplanations Conspicuous Consumption Conspicuous Consumption (Veblen 1973)(Veblen 1973) Relative Income HypothesisRelative Income Hypothesis (Duesenberry (Duesenberry
1949)1949) Competitive Consumption: Reference Competitive Consumption: Reference
Groups (“keeping up with the Joneses”) Groups (“keeping up with the Joneses”) (Schor 1998)(Schor 1998)
Income Inequality → Expenditure Cascade Income Inequality → Expenditure Cascade (Frank 1999)(Frank 1999)
Want Creation Want Creation (Galbraith 1958)(Galbraith 1958)
Empirical EvidenceEmpirical Evidence Data Set: the 2005 Consumer Expenditure SurveyData Set: the 2005 Consumer Expenditure Survey Hypothesis: relative status is more important to Hypothesis: relative status is more important to
consumer behavior than absolute status; (exp. ranking consumer behavior than absolute status; (exp. ranking larger influence than total exp. amt.)larger influence than total exp. amt.)
Dependent vars. (consumer expenditure items): Dependent vars. (consumer expenditure items): - clothing (including apparel and accessories)- clothing (including apparel and accessories) - home furnishings (furniture, linens, cookware) - home furnishings (furniture, linens, cookware) - entertainment admissions (movies, plays, etc.) - entertainment admissions (movies, plays, etc.) - number of automobiles owned- number of automobiles owned Explanatory vars. (demographic characteristics): Explanatory vars. (demographic characteristics): - race - income - education level- race - income - education level - age - region - absolute exp. amt. - age - region - absolute exp. amt. - sex - family size - relative exp. ranking - sex - family size - relative exp. ranking Estimation Model: Regression analysis -2SLS, Poisson/ Estimation Model: Regression analysis -2SLS, Poisson/
Negative Binomial, & OLS regressions Negative Binomial, & OLS regressions
ConclusionConclusion Relative status is a more important Relative status is a more important
factor in consumer behavior than factor in consumer behavior than absolute status for certain items absolute status for certain items
-clothing and automobiles -clothing and automobiles People spend according to immediate People spend according to immediate
and/or media reference groups and/or media reference groups Confirms literature on relative status Confirms literature on relative status
(Deusenberry 1949, Schor 1998, & (Deusenberry 1949, Schor 1998, & Frank 1999) Frank 1999)
Cultural differences by race → Social Cultural differences by race → Social ProcessProcess
Income Earnings by Income Earnings by EducationEducation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Black Hisp White
H.S.
B.A.
M.A.
Prof.
Men
Source: American Council of Education (2001)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Black Hisp White
H.S.
B.A.
M.A.
Prof.
Women
(In thousands of dollars)
(In thousands of dollars)
Demographic InequalitiesDemographic Inequalities
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Black Hisp White0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Black Hisp White
H.S.
B.A.
M.A.
Prof
Educational Attainment
Median Net Worth/Wealth
Source: Pew Hispanic Center (2002)
Source: U.S. Dept. of Education (2002)
(In thousands of dollars)
( In percents)
Demographic Inequalities Demographic Inequalities Cont’dCont’d
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Black Hisp White
Unemployment Rates
Businesses Owned
Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor, BLS
Source: U.S. Census Bureau (2000)
( In percents)
(In percents)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Black Hisp White
Credit Card Debt (pct. increase from 1989-2002)
Source: Center for American Progress (2006)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Black Hisp White
2001
2002
2003
AfterwordAfterword Consumption as a social phenomenon –Consumption as a social phenomenon –
more than just buying and using goods and more than just buying and using goods and services, subject to price and income services, subject to price and income constraintsconstraints
--cultural, regional, gender, educational--cultural, regional, gender, educational
differencesdifferences Include relative status and interdependence Include relative status and interdependence
in economic theory → push for sustainabilityin economic theory → push for sustainability ““Maybe the Joneses and the Smiths could Maybe the Joneses and the Smiths could
even cooperate rather than compete” –even cooperate rather than compete” –Juliet SchorJuliet Schor
AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments
Preceptor: Dr. William Darity, Jr., Econ Preceptor: Dr. William Darity, Jr., Econ Professor: Dr. Kenneth Bollen, SociologyProfessor: Dr. Kenneth Bollen, Sociology CEX experts at the Bureau of Labor CEX experts at the Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) Statistics (BLS) Stats consultants at the Odom InstituteStats consultants at the Odom Institute Participants and Affiliates in the Participants and Affiliates in the
MURAP/SPGRE ProgramMURAP/SPGRE Program
Image: Barbara Smaller, cartoonist from The New
Yorker (Jan. 2004)
ReferencesReferences Duesenberry, J S. (1949). Duesenberry, J S. (1949). Income, Saving, and the Income, Saving, and the
Theory of Consumer Behavior.Theory of Consumer Behavior. Cambridge, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Frank, R H. (1999). Frank, R H. (1999). Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of ExcessSatisfy in an Era of Excess. New York, NY : The Free . New York, NY : The Free Press.Press.
Galbraith, J K. (1958). Galbraith, J K. (1958). The Affluent Society.The Affluent Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Riverside Press.Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Riverside Press.
Kochhar, R. (2004). Kochhar, R. (2004). The Wealth of Hispanic The Wealth of Hispanic Households: 1996 to 2002.Households: 1996 to 2002. Retrieved July 5, 2007, Retrieved July 5, 2007,from Pew Hispanic Center, Washington, DC. Web site: from Pew Hispanic Center, Washington, DC. Web site: http://pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?http://pewhispanic.org/reports/report.php?ReportID=34.ReportID=34.
Rice, M. F. & Arekere, D. (2003). Rice, M. F. & Arekere, D. (2003). Educational Educational Attainment and Income Earning Inequities: Differences Attainment and Income Earning Inequities: Differences Between African American/Hispanic Americans and Between African American/Hispanic Americans and Whites.Whites. Retrieved July 7, 2007, from The Bush School Retrieved July 7, 2007, from The Bush School of Government & Public Service, Texas A & M of Government & Public Service, Texas A & M University. Web site: University. Web site: http://bush.tamu.edu/research/working_papers/mrice/http://bush.tamu.edu/research/working_papers/mrice/social-equity.pdf.social-equity.pdf.
Schor, J B. (1992). Schor, J B. (1992). The Overworked American: The The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of LeisureUnexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books. . New York: Basic Books.
------------- (1998). ------------- (1998). The Overspent American: Upscaling, The Overspent American: Upscaling, Downshifting, and the New Consumer.Downshifting, and the New Consumer. New York, NY: Basic New York, NY: Basic Books.Books.
The Clinton/Gore Economic Record: Continued Strong The Clinton/Gore Economic Record: Continued Strong Growth Across the Board.Growth Across the Board. Retrieved July 6, 2007, from Retrieved July 6, 2007, from United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC. Web site: Washington, DC. Web site: http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/1999pres/19991104c.htmlhttp://www.hhs.gov/news/press/1999pres/19991104c.html..
Veblen, T. (1973). Veblen, T. (1973). The Theory of the Leisure Class with an The Theory of the Leisure Class with an Introduction by John Kenneth Galbraith.Introduction by John Kenneth Galbraith. Boston: Houghton Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Mifflin Company.
U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2005: Interview SurveyExpenditure Survey, 2005: Interview Survey [Computer [Computer file]. Public Use Microdata. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of file]. Public Use Microdata. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics [producer and Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics [producer and distributor], 2007-02-17.distributor], 2007-02-17.
Weller, C. E. (2006). Pushing the Limit: Credit Card Debt Weller, C. E. (2006). Pushing the Limit: Credit Card Debt Burdens American Families. Retrieved Oct. 6, 2007, from Burdens American Families. Retrieved Oct. 6, 2007, from Center for American Progress, Washington, D.C. Web site: Center for American Progress, Washington, D.C. Web site: http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2006/07/b185959http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2006/07/b1859591.html1.html