Regulatory Interpretation

download Regulatory Interpretation

of 20

Transcript of Regulatory Interpretation

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    1/20

    Defining parallel and similar processes for global

    equity reporting purposes

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    2/20

    The Client was a global investment bank with a

    major UK trading operation. The client was

    expanding by acquisition and new clients trading

    in the emerging markets. The existing

    methodology used for the calculation of equity

    positions held relied on a heavily manual process

    and many aspects of international co-operation.

    This was coupled with a lack of systems

    infrastructure and manual completion of

    standardised forms.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    3/20

    A firm is required to report to the FSA when their

    trading of a stock crosses a threshold on purchase

    or disposal, including connected persons, person

    discharging managerial responsibility & directors.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    4/20

    The Panel on Takeovers and Mergers (the Panel)

    is an independent body, established in 1968,whose main functions are to issue and administer

    the City Code on Takeovers and Mergers (the

    Code) and to supervise and regulate takeovers

    and other matters to which the Code applies.

    Its central objective is to ensure fair

    treatment for all shareholders in

    takeover bids.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    5/20

    CEI Compliance were asked to provide a solution

    to support the project and provide a central pointof contact as well as interface with the

    compliance and risk IT departments.

    Half-way through the project, after identifying thescalability, the scope was increased to

    accommodate worldwide equities for global

    reporting to enable the investment

    research team to provide accurateconflict of interest disclosures

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    6/20

    The UK Regulator expected Disclosure and

    Transparency reports to be made at certainthresholds of positions taken or disposed of.

    The Panel for Takeovers and Mergers equally

    expected certain declarations to be made forimpacted parties or related holdings, or the bank

    could have been in breach of the rules.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    7/20

    The solution was to install a Compliance Business

    Analyst within the project to work with theproject manager and direct the developer on the

    process flow, exceptions and exceptions of the

    two reporting requirements as well as the on the

    project. The BA then grew the processes andtranslated them for the developer to design the

    system and user interface and provide

    automatic completion of the standardised

    forms for transmission by compliance

    after their approval on the go/

    no go function and final

    amendment if trades had been

    altered post report running.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    8/20

    The Investment Research element required

    identification of trading entities, systems andholdings that would impact the reporting

    requirements other than UK or dual listed

    equities.

    The roll out to the worldwide community was

    commenced after the parameters and

    specifications had been agreed, with

    the bank staff finalising the inputs.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    9/20

    The overall result was an extremely successful

    project that delivered on time and within budgetagainst a revised plan. The client was able to

    switch on the new methodology and use this in

    the course of regular trading and risk

    management activities.

    The new methodology enabled the client to

    more accurately identify their trading

    positions as well as improve thecapacity to provide reports to the

    interested parties with confidence

    and authority.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    10/20

    Total time spent 10 months.

    Resource Cost 264,000 Internal Cost approx. 350,000

    Senior Management sleep value - priceless

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    11/20

    You are always dealing with the principalwhenyou are dealing with my firm. This means that I am the

    relationship manager and there is no junior partner towhom responsibility will be transferred. There is nodecreased accountability, no "hand-off" to a less-informed colleague. If your interests are at stakecontinually, shouldnt you reasonably expect my

    continual involvement? We can usually provide resources on a "just in

    time" basis. That is, our projects do not have to coverexcessive overhead, such as multiple offices, largeadministrative backup, recruiting, partner perks, etc.

    We are organized to efficiently provide everything thatyou, as the buyer needs, but nothing more than thatwhich means that you are paying for value and resultsand only minimum overhead.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    12/20

    There is more likelihood ofyour privacy

    and confidentiality being observed withfewer people working on the project. We(and/or the few people we might also involve)are constant which means that there isnt the

    need to sift through dozens of differing

    perceptions. Were faster. We can respond to requests

    quickly, and return all calls within four hourswhich means to you that there is no need to

    worry about a bureaucracy, delays andunknown people on the other end of thephone

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    13/20

    Since we handle fewer concurrent projects thanlarger firms, our attention is focused on the job at

    hand. This means that you dont have to"compete" with another dozen or so of ourclients, which may be larger, paying more or aremore time-demanding. We structure our work sothatevery client receives maximum

    attention. Your investment is controlled. There is no

    "meter running". We work for a fixed, value-based, project fee. Large firms cant afford to dothat as readily because of all the people involved

    and their own insistence on measuring theirsuccess by billable hours. We measure our successby client objectives reached, not in time units.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    14/20

    The expertise that larger firms use is often white-labelling for them by a pool of consultants

    available in the marketplace at any one time. Weselect our consultants frompractisingsubject matter experts which means thatyou obtain the same or better expertise for less

    money, because;

    Inevitably, we are less expensive. Thereare economies to using someone who can basetheir fees on each situation and not on a pre-

    determined service scale or need for reaching apractice quota. This means quite simply bettervalue to you.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    15/20

    We will conduct an initial appraisal at our cost only charging for expenses

    We will make a proposal based on our

    appraisal with your outcomes and needs

    We will discuss the precise scope with youand provide you with a project price

    We will complete the work to your original

    scope and satisfaction

    Phase 1

    Phase 2

    Phase 3

    Click Mouse Reveal Next Phase

    Phase 4

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    16/20

    We have a wealth of Financial Services Experience, and due to

    the remedial nature of our work forming over 60% of our

    business and that is conducted under a Non Disclosure Regime,

    we cannot demonstrate every client.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    17/20

    We Do have a large

    amount of experience in a

    number of other fields and

    industries within the major

    utilities and even LocalAuthorities.

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    18/20

    We can provide all manner of assistance in

    Initial risk assessment or audit an initial analysis toidentify higher risk areas of the business and weaknessesin procedures. We also do risk management design.

    Business development business analysis advice oradvice on particular issues for example, how your firm isTreating Customers Fairly and an action plan for

    implementing TCF across your business. Help with setting up procedures for example procedural

    manuals for recruitment, training and competence,complaints handling and anti-money laundering. May alsoinclude templates for disclosure documents, fact-finds andregisters.

    File audits checks to ensure that procedures are beingfollowed and identify good practices and weaknesses

    Complaints Handling cost effective and project managedfrom start to finish making your response robust andconsistent

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    19/20

    We can provide all manner of assistance in;

    Technical support may include advice on particularproducts or regulatory reporting. May be available invarious formats, including website, helpdesk and individualtechnical advice.

    Training for example competency assessments, trainingopportunities or product risk guidance. May be online

    support, regulatory updates or seminar based. Support on individual issues for example in dealing with

    a complaint, a financial promotion or a particular suitabilityletter.

    Financial promotions (all areas of advertisement) - fullsupport which would include websites, brochures, DVD's,

    email templates, client mail shots, adverts, contactingexisting clients and so on.

    Remedial work helping to action remedial workrequired by the FSA.

    And much more just ask!

  • 7/31/2019 Regulatory Interpretation

    20/20

    CEI Compliance Limited

    www.cei-compliance-limited.co.uk

    Tel 0800 689 9 689 (UK)

    Tel (+44) 7092 289901 (Int)

    We operate across the UK, Europe

    and the Middle East.

    Currently exploring opportunities in

    Latin America