Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase Activity Rhizobium ... · Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase II...

8
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, Sept. 1989, p. 5087-5094 0021-9193/89/095087-08$02.00/0 Copyright X3 1989, American Society for Microbiology Regulation of Glutamine Synthetase II Activity in Rhizobium meliloti 104A14 ROBERT G. SHATTERS,'t JOHN E. SOMERVILLE,2t AND MICHAEL L. KAHN',2,3 Vol. 171, No. 9 Program in Genetics and Cell Biology,1 Department of Microbiology,2 and Institute of Biological Chemistry,3 Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-6340 Received 3 March 1989/Accepted 10 June 1989 Most rhizobia contain two glutamine synthetase (GS) enzymes: GSI, encoded by glnA, and GSII, encoded by glnil. We have found that WSU414, a Rhizobium meliloti 104A14 glutamine auxotroph derived from a glnA parental strain, is an ntrA mutant. The R. meliloti glnII promoter region contains DNA sequences similar to those found in front of other genes that require ntrA for their transcription. No GSII was found in the glnA ntrA mutant, and when a translational fusion of gillI to the Escherichia coli lacZ gene was introduced into WSU414, no 0-galactosidase was expressed. These results indicate that ntrA is required for glnII expression. The ntrA mutation did not prevent the expression of GSI. In free-living culture, the level of GSII and of the glnII-lacZ fusion protein was regulated by altering transcription in response to available nitrogen. No GSII protein was detected in alfalfa, pea, or soybean nodules when anti-GSII-specific antiserum was used. Most gram-negative bacteria have only one glutamine synthetase (GS), but two distinct GS proteins are found in many bacterial species that are associated with plants, including Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium species (11, 12), Agrobacterium species (16), and Frankia species (15). GSI (encoded by gInA) is similar to the GS found in other bacteria (8, 11, 38), but GSII (encoded by glnII) is more closely related to the enzyme found in eucaryotes (7; R. G. Shatters and M. L. Kahn, J. Mol. Evol., in press). Why this second enzyme is uniquely found in plant-associated bacte- ria is unclear; although very different in size and structure, the two GS enzymes have similar affinities for their sub- strates and synthesize glutamine at similar rates (11). Inac- tivation of either Rhizobium gene by mutation does not block nodulation or nitrogen fixation (9, 37; J. Somerville, R. Shatters, and M. Kahn, submitted for publication), and inactivation of either Agrobacterium gene does not affect virulence (36). The most striking difference between GSI and GSII is how the enzymes are controlled in response to nitrogen availabil- ity. The activity of GSI is altered posttranslationally by adenylylation, but the level of the protein remains relatively constant (11, 25, 26). In contrast, the level of GSII enzyme activity is different in bacteria grown on different nitrogen sources (6, 11, 20, 29) or at different oxygen concentrations (1, 33); this effect has been ascribed to transcriptional control of glnII. Regulation of procaryotic GS activity is best characterized in the enteric bacteria that have a single GSI-type enzyme (24, 28). This GS is regulated both transcriptionally and by adenylylation of the protein in response to available nitro- gen. Transcription is controlled by the nitrogen regulatory system (ntr system), which also regulates the synthesis of various enzymes involved in nitrogen uptake and metabo- * Corresponding author. t Present address: U.S. Department of Agriculture Northern Midwest Regional Laboratory, Peoria, IL 61604. t Present address: Department of Biology, Kalamazoo College, Kalamazoo, MI 49007. lism (24, 28). Three genes involved in the ntr system are ntrA (rpoN), which encodes an alternate RNA polymerase sigma subunit (18, 19); ntrC, which encodes a regulatory protein (NRI) that can act as both a transcriptional repressor and an activator (18, 19, 30, 34); and ntrB, which encodes a kinase- phosphatase activity that modifies NRI (30). In the enteric bacteria, mutations in any of these genes lead to glutamine auxotrophy (24, 28). In Rhizobium species, the role of the ntr system in the control of ammonia assimilation is not as clear. R. meliloti 1021 ntrA (35) and ntrC (39) mutants have been isolated, but neither mutant is a glutamine auxotroph. To understand the role GSII might play in rhizobial nitrogen metabolism, we found mutants that were unable to express GSII, by isolating glutamine auxotrophs derived from an R. meliloti glnA mutant (38a). We report here that one of the mutants we isolated is defective in the Rhizobium equivalent of the ntrA gene. This observation, together with the recent work of Martin et al. (29) showing that the ntrC gene is involved in regulating GSII in B. japonicum, indi- cates that GSII is controlled in the rhizobia by a regulatory system similar to that of enteric bacteria. By using a fusion of glnlI to the Escherichia coli 3-galactosidase gene, we show that the activation of glnII transcription is consistent with regulation by the ntr system. By using antibodies to GSII, we also show that the GSII protein is induced when cells are grown on poor nitrogen sources. These antibodies are unable to detect GSII protein in alfalfa, pea, or soybean nodules. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bacterial strains and plasmids. The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed and described in Table 1. Media and chemicals. All the media used in this study have been previously described (38). Affi-Gel Blue agarose (Bio- Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.) and DEAE-cellulose DE-52 (Whatman, Inc., Clifton, N.J.) were used in GSII purification. Proteins transferred to nitrocellulose were de- tected by using goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conju- gated to alkaline phosphatase (Sigma Chemical Co., St. 5087 on June 16, 2020 by guest http://jb.asm.org/ Downloaded from

Transcript of Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase Activity Rhizobium ... · Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase II...

Page 1: Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase Activity Rhizobium ... · Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase II Activity in Rhizobium meliloti 104A14 ROBERTG. SHATTERS,'tJOHNE. SOMERVILLE,2tANDMICHAELL.

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, Sept. 1989, p. 5087-50940021-9193/89/095087-08$02.00/0Copyright X3 1989, American Society for Microbiology

Regulation of Glutamine Synthetase II Activity inRhizobium meliloti 104A14

ROBERT G. SHATTERS,'t JOHN E. SOMERVILLE,2t AND MICHAEL L. KAHN',2,3

Vol. 171, No. 9

Program in Genetics and Cell Biology,1 Department of Microbiology,2 and Institute of Biological Chemistry,3Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-6340

Received 3 March 1989/Accepted 10 June 1989

Most rhizobia contain two glutamine synthetase (GS) enzymes: GSI, encoded by glnA, and GSII, encoded byglnil. We have found that WSU414, a Rhizobium meliloti 104A14 glutamine auxotroph derived from a glnAparental strain, is an ntrA mutant. The R. meliloti glnII promoter region contains DNA sequences similar tothose found in front of other genes that require ntrA for their transcription. No GSII was found in the glnA ntrAmutant, and when a translational fusion of gillI to the Escherichia coli lacZ gene was introduced into WSU414,no 0-galactosidase was expressed. These results indicate that ntrA is required for glnII expression. The ntrAmutation did not prevent the expression of GSI. In free-living culture, the level of GSII and of the glnII-lacZfusion protein was regulated by altering transcription in response to available nitrogen. No GSII protein wasdetected in alfalfa, pea, or soybean nodules when anti-GSII-specific antiserum was used.

Most gram-negative bacteria have only one glutaminesynthetase (GS), but two distinct GS proteins are found inmany bacterial species that are associated with plants,including Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium species (11, 12),Agrobacterium species (16), and Frankia species (15). GSI(encoded by gInA) is similar to the GS found in otherbacteria (8, 11, 38), but GSII (encoded by glnII) is moreclosely related to the enzyme found in eucaryotes (7; R. G.Shatters and M. L. Kahn, J. Mol. Evol., in press). Why thissecond enzyme is uniquely found in plant-associated bacte-ria is unclear; although very different in size and structure,the two GS enzymes have similar affinities for their sub-strates and synthesize glutamine at similar rates (11). Inac-tivation of either Rhizobium gene by mutation does not blocknodulation or nitrogen fixation (9, 37; J. Somerville, R.Shatters, and M. Kahn, submitted for publication), andinactivation of either Agrobacterium gene does not affectvirulence (36).The most striking difference between GSI and GSII is how

the enzymes are controlled in response to nitrogen availabil-ity. The activity of GSI is altered posttranslationally byadenylylation, but the level of the protein remains relativelyconstant (11, 25, 26). In contrast, the level of GSII enzymeactivity is different in bacteria grown on different nitrogensources (6, 11, 20, 29) or at different oxygen concentrations(1, 33); this effect has been ascribed to transcriptionalcontrol of glnII.

Regulation of procaryotic GS activity is best characterizedin the enteric bacteria that have a single GSI-type enzyme(24, 28). This GS is regulated both transcriptionally and byadenylylation of the protein in response to available nitro-gen. Transcription is controlled by the nitrogen regulatorysystem (ntr system), which also regulates the synthesis ofvarious enzymes involved in nitrogen uptake and metabo-

* Corresponding author.t Present address: U.S. Department of Agriculture Northern

Midwest Regional Laboratory, Peoria, IL 61604.t Present address: Department of Biology, Kalamazoo College,

Kalamazoo, MI 49007.

lism (24, 28). Three genes involved in the ntr system are ntrA(rpoN), which encodes an alternate RNA polymerase sigmasubunit (18, 19); ntrC, which encodes a regulatory protein(NRI) that can act as both a transcriptional repressor and anactivator (18, 19, 30, 34); and ntrB, which encodes a kinase-phosphatase activity that modifies NRI (30). In the entericbacteria, mutations in any of these genes lead to glutamineauxotrophy (24, 28). In Rhizobium species, the role of the ntrsystem in the control of ammonia assimilation is not as clear.R. meliloti 1021 ntrA (35) and ntrC (39) mutants have beenisolated, but neither mutant is a glutamine auxotroph.To understand the role GSII might play in rhizobial

nitrogen metabolism, we found mutants that were unable toexpress GSII, by isolating glutamine auxotrophs derivedfrom an R. meliloti glnA mutant (38a). We report here thatone of the mutants we isolated is defective in the Rhizobiumequivalent of the ntrA gene. This observation, together withthe recent work of Martin et al. (29) showing that the ntrCgene is involved in regulating GSII in B. japonicum, indi-cates that GSII is controlled in the rhizobia by a regulatorysystem similar to that of enteric bacteria. By using a fusionof glnlI to the Escherichia coli 3-galactosidase gene, weshow that the activation of glnII transcription is consistentwith regulation by the ntr system. By using antibodies toGSII, we also show that the GSII protein is induced whencells are grown on poor nitrogen sources. These antibodiesare unable to detect GSII protein in alfalfa, pea, or soybeannodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and plasmids. The bacterial strains andplasmids used in this study are listed and described in Table1.Media and chemicals. All the media used in this study have

been previously described (38). Affi-Gel Blue agarose (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.) and DEAE-celluloseDE-52 (Whatman, Inc., Clifton, N.J.) were used in GSIIpurification. Proteins transferred to nitrocellulose were de-tected by using goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conju-gated to alkaline phosphatase (Sigma Chemical Co., St.

5087

on June 16, 2020 by guesthttp://jb.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 2: Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase Activity Rhizobium ... · Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase II Activity in Rhizobium meliloti 104A14 ROBERTG. SHATTERS,'tJOHNE. SOMERVILLE,2tANDMICHAELL.

5088 SHATTERS ET AL.

TABLE 1. Genetic materials

Strain or Relevant properties Referenceplasmid or source

E. coli ET8051 ET8000 A(glnA-rha) 26R. meliloti

104A14 Wild type 38GLN210 104A14 glnA210 38WSU414 104A14 glnA2J0 ntrA 38aWSU660 10A14 gInII 38a

B. japonicum Wild type 9BJ110

R. legumino- Wild type 21sarum 300

PlasmidspMK318 P4 cos, IncPl replicon 38pJS36 R. meliloti ginA in pMK318 38pJS73 R. meliloti gInII in pMK318 38apJS87 R. meliloti ntrA in pMK318 38apJS95 ntrA::TnS from WSU414 38apRS16 ginII Tetr IncPl replicon 38apSKS105 lacZYA Ampr, pMB9 replicon 10pUC18 lacZ Ampr, multiple cloning 32

site

Louis, Mo.). Antibiotics and other biochemicals were ob-tained from Sigma. Low-melting-temperature SeaPlaqueagarose was purchased from FMC Corp., Marine ColloidsDiv., Rockland, Maine.Recombinant DNA techniques. The recombinant DNA

methods used in this study have been described previously(22). Restriction enzymes were purchased from variouscommercial sources, and digests were carried out as speci-fied by the manufacturers. Restriction fragments were iso-lated either by cutting the appropriate bands out of anagarose gel and extracting them with phenol (4) or by usinglow-melting-temperature SeaPlaque agarose for in-gel liga-tion, as described by the manufacturer.DNA sequences were determined by using the dideoxy-

nucleotide termination method with T7 DNA polymerasesupplied in the Sequenase kit from U.S. Biochemicals,[ot-35S]dATP from Du Pont, NEN Research Products, Bos-ton, Mass., and single-stranded M13 DNA templates (40).The sequence was determined for both strands and acrosseach cloning site. Sequence analysis was carried out byusing the University of Wisconsin Sequence Analysis soft-ware package (13) with the assistance of Susan Johns and theWashington State University Visualization, Analysis andDesign in the Molecular Sciences center.

Restoring the wild-type glnA gene in R. meliloti WSU414.Plasmid pJS36, which contains the wild-type glnA gene (38),was transduced into R. meliloti WSU414(pPH1JI) by usingthe P2 encapsidation procedure described previously (38).We screened for replacement of the mutant glnA210 allele onthe chromosome with the wild-type allele by using Southernblotting (38). g1nA+ recombinants were isolated as strepto-mycin-resistant, gentamicin-resistant, tetracycline-sensitivecolonies.

Construction of the glnII::IacZ trlnslational fusion. Thecodon for amino acid 28 of gInlI was fused to the codon foramino acid 6 of the E. coli lacZ gene (Fig. 1). Plasmid pRS16contains the entire gInlI gene cloned as a 2.38-kilobase-pair(kb) Hindlll-Bglll fragment (38a). It contains a 555-base-pair(bp) EcoRI fragment within the glnII gene (Shatters andKahn, in press). This EcoRI fragment was replaced with a9.8-kb DNA fragment from pRS20-41 that contains the lacZ

I lKb

I I

pRS20- 41" ' lac Z I Y I A I S lamDr 11,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I - , 0.5Kb.

/Bg ,R_-ginil

Eco RI24 25 26 27 F28 } 6ACG CAG ATC AAG GAA TTC CCG GGC GTC GAC CTG CCA ACC TTGte

ginil lac Z

FIG. 1. Construction of the gInII-lacZ translational fusion.pRS16 (38a) was digested with EcoRl to remove a 555-bp fragmentlocated within the gInII gene. This fragment was replaced with a9.8-kb EcoRI fragment from pRS20-41 that contained lacZYA and agene encoding ampicillin resistance. In the resulting plasmid,pRS21-1, amino acid 28 of GSII is joined to amino acid 6 off-galactosidase and gInil is transcribed in the direction of the arrow.The numbers above the sequence indicate the amino acid residue inthe protein. The region between the two coding sequences is themultiple cloning site from pSKS105 with the modification describedin the text. Restriction enzyme sites: B, BamHI; Bg, BgIll; H,Hindlll; R, EcoRI; P, Pstl; S, Sall; Sm, SmaI. Symbol: _, vectorDNA. Y and A, lac Y and lacA genes.

gene. pRS20-41 was derived from pSKS105 (10) by digestionwith BamHI, removing the 4-bp protruding ends with SInuclease, and ligating the blunt ends. This deletion puts theEcoRI site into the proper frame for construction of theglnII: :IacZ fusion.Enzyme assays. Glutamine synthetase activity was mea-

sured by using the transferase assay (38). 3-Galactosidaseactivity in cells that had been permeabilized with toluenewas measured by using the hydrolysis of o-nitrophenyl-P-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) (23).GSII protein purification. pRS11, a plasmid that expresses

the ginHI gene at a high level, was constructed by cloning the1.5-kb HindlIl-BamHI fragment from pJS73 that containsginII (38a ) downstream from the lac promoter in pUC18. InET8051, an E. coli glutamine auxotroph (27), this plasmidexpressed high levels of GSII with or without isopropyl-3-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) in the medium. E. coliET8051(pRS11) (8 liters) was grown to early stationaryphase in LB medium and harvested by centrifugation. Thepellet was suspended in 2 volumes of IM buffer (20 mMimidazole hydrochloride, 1 mM MnCl2 [pH 7.0]) and thecells were broken by using a French press. After centrifu-gation at 25,000 x g for 30 min, streptomycin sulfate wasadded to the supernatant to give a final concentration of 5mg/ml. This was stirred on ice for 30 min and centrifuged at25,000 x g for 20 min; the supernatant was dialyzed againstIM buffer (pH 6.5). Portions of this extract were loaded on a30-ml DE-52 DEAE-cellulose column equilibrated with IMbuffer (pH 6.5), and GSII activity was eluted with a 0 to 175mM NaCl gradient in IM buffer (pH 6.5). Fractions contain-ing GSII activity were pooled and applied directly to a 30-mlAffi-Gel Blue column. The column was washed with 90 ml ofeach of the following: IM buffer (pH 6.0), IM buffer (pH 6.0)plus 0.5 M NaCl, IM buffer (pH 6.0), IM buffer (pH 7.0) plus10 mM NaCi, and IM buffer (pH 7.0). GSII was eluted withIM buffer (pH 7.0) plus 10 mM ADP. Fractions containingGSII activity were concentrated in a stirred cell (AmiconCorp., Lexington, Mass.) by using a YM10 membrane. Thisfraction was purified further by electrophoresis on a 7%

PKbZ],, . _r.. --_nl#C,)1- 1

J. BACTERIOL.

on June 16, 2020 by guesthttp://jb.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 3: Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase Activity Rhizobium ... · Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase II Activity in Rhizobium meliloti 104A14 ROBERTG. SHATTERS,'tJOHNE. SOMERVILLE,2tANDMICHAELL.

GSII EXPRESSION IN R. MELILOTI 5089

nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel, and the GSII band was

detected by staining for activity in situ (25). After themobility of the GSII protein had been determined, prepara-

tive gels were stained with Coomassie blue, and the bandcorresponding to GSII was used to immunize a New ZealandWhite rabbit (R and R Rabbitry, Stanwood, Wash.). Therabbit serum was used directly for the described procedures.Western blots. Crude extracts of nodules were prepared

from Pisum sativum cv. Wisconsin Perfection inoculatedwith R. leguminosarum 300, Glycine max cv. Prize inocu-lated with B. japonicum BJ110, and Medicago sativa cv.

Ladak inoculated with R. meliloti 104A14. Four- to six-week-old nodules of each were crushed with a glass homog-enizer in 0.5 M sucrose-25 mM Tris-5 mM dithiothreitol inthe presence of 10 mg of polyvinylpyrrolidone per ml and 1mg of p-aminobenzamidine per ml. The nodule slurry was

filtered through two layers of Miracloth and stored at -20°C.Crude extracts were prepared from cultures of R. meliloti104A14, R. leguminosarum 300, and B. japonicum BJ110 bygrowing 250-ml cultures in YMB broth, harvesting the cellsby centrifugation, and suspending them in 0.5 ml of IMbuffer (pH 7.4). The cells were broken by sonication, debriswere removed by centrifugation, and the supernatants were

used as the crude extracts for Western immunoblotting.Protein concentrations were determined by using a modifiedBradford assay (Bio-Rad). Total protein (25 to 75 ,ug) fromthe sonic extracts was separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose,and the separated proteins were visualized immunologically(5).

RESULTS

An R. meliloti mutant that does not express GSII has a

mutation in ntrA. WSU414 is a TnS mutant of R. melilotiGLN210 that was isolated as a glutamine auxotroph (38a).By comparing restriction enzyme digests of pJS95, a plasmidthat contains the TnS insert, and pJS87, a plasmid thatcomplements the insertion in WSU414, we located theregion of pJS87 that surrounds the TnS mutation. When we

determined the DNA sequence of this region (Fig. 2), we

found an open reading frame in which 86.4% of the baseswere identical to those in the recently sequenced R. meliloti1021 ntrA gene (35). Two gaps were placed in the R. meliloti1021 ntrA sequence to obtain the best alignment, a 3-basegap starting at base 158 and a 1-base gap at base 1533. Webelieve that the two genes are functionally equivalent, sincethere are no restriction enzyme bands in digests of R.meliloti 104A14 that hybridize to pJS87 except those foundin the plasmid (data not shown). WSU414 and its g1nA+derivative, WSU415 (see below), have growth characteris-tics similar to those of R. meliloti 1021 ntrA mutants de-scribed by Ronson et al. (35). All are Fix- and are unable toutilize succinate as a carbon source or nitrate as a nitrogensource (data not shown).One line of evidence that ntrA acts in controlling glnII

transcription was obtained by analyzing kanamycin-resistantWSU414 revertants able to grow in the absence of glu-tamine. When restriction digests of these revertants were

examined by Southern hybridization with TnS DNA as a

probe, approximately half retained the original TnS insertionbut had a new and unique band (J. Somerville, Ph.D. thesis,Washington State University, Pullman, 1985). Southern hy-bridization analysis with the glnlI gene as a probe showedthat the new insertion was linked to glnII and that only a

portion of the TnS, most probably a single copy of IS50, had

inserted into the gInII promoter region (data not shown).When total DNA from one of these revertants was digestedwith HindlIl and ligated into pUC18, plasmids containingthis altered ginII gene could be isolated by their ability tocomplement the E. coli glutamine auxotroph ET8051. Sincethe wild-type glnHI gene is not expressed in E. coli (38a), webelieve that the insertion of IS50 activated the expression ofthe ginII gene. This implies that the mutation in WSU414affected gInII transcription and not some posttranscriptionalcontrol. Although this class of WSU414 revertants couldgrow with ammonia as the sole nitrogen source, they couldnot grow on nitrate as the sole nitrogen source or onsuccinate as the sole carbon source, and they still formedFix- nodules on alfalfa. Therefore, they have retained othercomponents of the ntrA phenotype.

ntrA is not required for expression of glnA. WSU414, thentrA mutant we isolated, also contains a gInA mutation. Todetermine whether ntrA was required for ginA expression,we recombined the wild-type glnA gene back into the R.meliloti WSU414 genome as described in Materials andMethods. The resulting strain, WSU415, was not a glutamineauxotroph and had significant heat-stable GS activity (datanot shown).

ntr control sequences are present in the glnII promoterregion. We have sequenced the R. meliloti gInII gene (Shat-ters and Kahn, in press). The upstream region (Fig. 3)contains an 18-bp sequence that is very similar to the generalntr consensus sequence (2, 14) and, in particular, to theversion of this sequence found in the B. japonicum glnIIpromoter (9) (Table 2). In this sequence the highly conservedbases were located in two groups centered at -24 and -12with respect to the transcriptional start site. From this wehave inferred the start of R. meliloti ginII transcription, asindicated in Fig. 3 and Table 2.An upstream activator sequence (termed the NRI consen-

sus) is also required for NRI-mediated transcriptional acti-vation in members of the family Enterobacteriaceae (17, 22,32). Carlson et al. (9) found a potential NRI consensussequence between -103 and -119 in the B. japonicum gInIIpromoter. The R, meliloti ginII promoter has a similarpotential NRI consensus between -98 and -114 (Fig. 3;Table 2). In E. coli, NRI consensus sequences are functionalup to 2 kb upstream from the start of transcription (34), so aprecise distance between NRI and the start of transcriptionis not critical for function.GSII activity of free-living R. meliloti 104A14 is transcrip-

tionally controlled in response to available nitrogen. A trans-lational fusion of the glnHI gene to the coding sequence for P-galactosidase was constructed in pRS21-1 (Fig. 1) to inves-tigate how ginII transcription is controlled. Minimal manni-tol media containing either NH4Cl or glutamate as a nitrogensource were inoculated with either wild-type R. meliloti orR. meliloti(pRS21-1), and the 3-galactosidase activity incultures in the late stage of logarithmic growth was deter-mined. R. meliloti 104A14(pRS21-1) grown with glutamate asthe nitrogen source contained 6,300 U of P-galactosidaseactivity, compared with 500 U when ammonia was thenitrogen source. A background activity of 2 U was observedfor R. meliloti 104A14 lacking pRS21-1. WSU414(pRS21-1)and WSU415(pRS21-1) had only background levels of 3-galactosidase activity when the cells were grown on eitherglutamate or ammonia (data not shown). This result isconsistent with the idea that ntrA is needed for gInIlI tran-scription.Genes regulated by the enteric ntr system are typically

repressed after ammonia is added (24, 28). To determine the

VOL. 171, 1989

on June 16, 2020 by guesthttp://jb.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 4: Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase Activity Rhizobium ... · Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase II Activity in Rhizobium meliloti 104A14 ROBERTG. SHATTERS,'tJOHNE. SOMERVILLE,2tANDMICHAELL.

5090 SHATTERS ET AL. J. BACTERIOL.

IC, (0 0 N '.0 0 (N LnZ).(N co'0 r - --44 4 '-

'1 u 'Q4 E- ~ EHU *'0< CU '02*u U '4 U Q..E-40 '1Z "<-4U <iU c<0 a) p IU~ UQH O>0 '00

Q)'0

4>U

O:cDuup<(D <

0)0 (4< 1-E '-40 1C/U-4< 4" >-4 '00UE~~-4<(9U<U UO CIH~~~~~~~~~~~~wU <U <0 <U <04 U UU 'Uo 4'

04H<U <0 ~~~~~~~~~~~UU c<U <0 H < U < >U <U <U 'HCUH 0)0 C~~~~~~~~U0)0 0U Cu01-' U CU p 4U 1-40 1-iU (fU '1-

pC0-< EQ 0)1-4 4-UO ( '0 (< EU U '-4 U -4 U *UUH< UU 04 u-) <0 ~ <U <>HE-<" UU < 'O

~~3U >10~~~~ EU -4pU Q)0U~ '00 _PU 43U '00 0 U 0)0s< <-<u - X0 '- '-4 '-4 0)H '4< '-40u o 0)0 '-1-4l< PU

(4 u U 040U a) p U U )OU CUEI--'U'P~w-4 40~ '-0pf<a4 u 14u l< u o< o< l< u o<0)1-4 '-4< E uO 'OH '01-40

~~ '-4<0 E~~~~~~~ULW'<-40 '-4< 0)H EUp 0)-4 EU Lu '--4 ECU'4-JU*OU '~~~~~~~~0)0* UU 'U ~-''4 '>1 *UO ')L'4'0~~~~~~04H ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~-~~~O ~~~~~0< <U UU OH~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '- O 04HP <U < UOQ)p U 'OH EU (4'-4U '-4 '-4 '-4A< -'-4< >1< (4U < 0)H

CZ z~01-4 EUp (4p<o< < 0) -4 0)H< '-4 >3 u<~ -4U (4)p<< '-40uu31<- '00 '00 (4 (E- 040) 3uQUO 0-U0 E-U EU -J4OU'0H*4 ''-40--''-OU -4< '>4'(4< EU -40)H ~ ''0 '01- *0)0 'EUmP

cU E<0 0)04 '-'H 3U o3< '-4 '0<u 0)01' > _ p3U 1<0 (wU'-< 0)0 4U E-oH'H 0) '-4 'H ' -4E-0 LH oU -< 0)1-4~ o >1<0L)0E4 041- E-40 0)0 QEHO >1U0 ->1U0 E0 0)0 E(40 E0i '-4U< 4

0) -4U< 0) (4< '-(A4U 0)H4 >U EU '-4<OA ,0)H )1- '-4 EUC.

'-4< E-4U (4 (4<U ( u :'--4 uQ.4E0H '-E-4 U > <04H'-4U (4< EUU0 ~<0 <U <U) <-U H<E- 1-4 < (p<U UU 0 UU <U) <0--

23U'0U >10 04HU 04H '0Uw(4.'0 EO 0H CU E0u

'-4< ,COH~~~u (4 >1 0) X2H -0) (4< 0)U<p>(4 .C0 '--4< 'OHnCU 1-lOU 1-40 >H CU >-~~ CO a4UF U 2U CU (4HO C1-4 0)U 04)U 0)U '-4 'OH 0)>U EO >1< c-4 0) '-4<_CLUO040 (1< 3< Cf<UU >U 03< 04 ~-4 UOU >O UO O

.C0 '-4 0)H '-- 4< '-4U u'-40 '-4H E '-4 0) (4< 0)0H< <00 c0 UU <U P <U 1-4 <0 UO< .2<-< Cl)HK'0) ''-< E 'u4O*4 '140 '-H ''4 '>1 'EU '>1< ''O '1-40Z<u UU << UU -4< 0E40P -4Hs< < OH <0 HH >U 040<'OHE- (4 < '1 -4< Q(-4< u0)H EO (4< L0 0)0- 'OH >1. 0)H '-4HuE>U (~ u<U UU <U u.-A04<U HU CII >UP < E< 4-4< 023 U (1-0 >10 1.-40 Q E-H 4H c~o (CU C E4O 0)0E (20 EUw (4HOQ)H 0)0 '-(UJ)U >1A< (4<U >1- r-4< 1-E4eLU '-4H -Q)4<

0)0 W1-0< 0)0 '-40 '-<U QLHu 3UQEU L2H - 0) '-4< 0)0 1-U )H'U(2U U E-1 < >1OH 00 '0< 1-l0 )< 1-40o EUO 0)0 '

UO ci3H. u p« UU <U UO <U UH 14< 0< H < 44 < UEU (2< 1lU U 4 0) (2-IU 23U >1H c23U C0~ 'lU0 C u c0 2U0)0 wu'-4 0) 1e '-4H '-4<p 0) '-4U >-4 '-40o 'O EU '-4< C

'-4 'OH 12 0)E)H 0)H 0)H 120 '40 'OH EU -'-4 -UUO ><U 4H< u '-0 -3 <3 H < <U< >U M<0 220 <0'C'< u p'23 '00 'EO< '0U ''-40U u'04U 3 '0) '(4 ~4U'14 'U 'E CEU '-4 '-4 0) - O (4< -4<4H >< 0) 1-U

UUo :<U 4c3 <0 0 <UQ U $4U04 ~-3 03n< <0 HH0)H 0) 0) >< -' (4 0)Hf< 2H >1 M)'OPO>1<p-- o> HO '-30 3 p< 220 <UO '-3 0 H< c P > >U >0 CD(4Hu 23 0.0 04U 1-40 04UP O 20H 1EO 23< 0)0u EU 1-10-'-4< -iU0)H (< 1l 0)0 0) (4< 0)-- '-4< '4 120 l0) '-40< Q

23 C4U wu - U f 41-40 c>1 '-4U >1 1-4 (4 E EU 423 '-4 LO Z-'0)H'EO'>1 ''-4< ''--4H ''OH ''-40 'a40 '-4<n '12 '00 '4< 'OH'-4c-3O 040 HHn UO UU >0U H< O0H 0 >Ur0)U ~ -(4< 'H '-040)-I-U'OH '-40 E(4< EU '-40 103< /)p l<p« UO UU F03U <0 > 0 UnpU «-< c « 00 <U H 0 "4'00 r(40 '4H 230 23wu 0EU 4230 CHU '-40r-'00 (4H EU CO '0'-40 >1-< (4< 0) E-4< 120 0) E-4U 'OHF '-40 -'-4< 0) EU 'H 1(

0)0 >-4 '-40 0)H 0)H 'O '-40 >10H EU< 0)H -M-4 EUc23U< U0)0 23U 230 '0H 04 :"0< CU Wu4 Wu0 (40 '00< '00 '00)H'-4H'-4<'-4< '-40 (4< '--4< EU 'OH '-4< >1< '-40 '-40'H<~~~~~~~~~~4p>1l<~-4 4-4<0 00000 U <U 00 040i >U 0 '3 <,U0'-40 '-4 '-<U E EUi >u F12H '- 0) (4< E (4 < '-4 (4< '-P 4H 0<nU 3 4 F00 00 40 04 UU w<U <0 <JU -U4-< < 1-4 < '000)H '4< '-40'-40 EU 0)0 '-40 0)H EO 0) '-40 '-4 (4 Hcn< 00 <U <U 040 3u p~03<0 <U 3O 04 '-40< 00 <U 'U

C-U J-~ f

(N 'O' co 0 (N l'r '0 0o (N v.x C Q X'--4 (N 'n- v . r- 0o a) 0 (N r LO L E mU- a-C/~ C

on June 16, 2020 by guesthttp://jb.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 5: Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase Activity Rhizobium ... · Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase II Activity in Rhizobium meliloti 104A14 ROBERTG. SHATTERS,'tJOHNE. SOMERVILLE,2tANDMICHAELL.

GSII EXPRESSION IN R. MELILOTI 5091

-276CCCCCTCCTCATTTTTACCCACGCCTCCACCCCCCCTTTTCACCCCAACCACTTCCTCCCCATCACCCCAATTTCCTCCCCCCCCCGGCTAAACC

-175

-74

+26

-176

< NI- >CCCCAGACTACCAATAAAATCAACGCGTCGCCCTCTGCTGAGAACCCCACAAACCACGCCAGCGCCATCGTTGCGCATCACATCCTGCCCCCTACTTTCC

<------ntr-------> ?TTCACAAGGCGCTACCCCACCTCGAAAGTGGCGACCCCCCAAAGCGAGTTGGCACGTTTGATGCTTAACGCAAATGGATCCCTGGCGGCCAGACGCATTT

GLNII---->GGCGCCGAAGCCGTGTCAGGATTTGCCCAACCTCGCAGTACCCACGTTAGAGAGATTGACTGATGACCAAGTATAAG

X T x Y x

-75

+25

+107

FIG. 3. The R. meliloti glnII promoter. The regions within the arrows have strong similarities to consensus sequences in promotersregulated by the Ntr system (2, 14, 17). The NRI consensus is an upstream activator sequence shown to be the binding site of the NRI protein(24, 28). The ntr consensus (indicated as ntr) is required for transcription dependent on NtrA, an alternative RNA polymerase sigma subunit(18, 19). The question mark marks the proposed site of the start of transcription as determined relative to the ntr consensus. The asterisksindicate a potential Shine-Dalgarno sequence. Bases are numbered starting at the proposed transcriptional start site.

effect on gin!! transcription of adding ammonia to glutamate-grown cells, we diluted stationary-phase cultures of R.meliloti 104A14 and R. meliloti 104A14(pRS21-1) in minimalmannitol medium containing glutamate. Replicate cultureswere grown to the mid-log phase, and NH4Cl was added toone of the replicates to give a final concentration of 15 mM.The cultures were grown for a further 10 h, and sampleswere taken at intervals to determine 3-galactosidase activity(Fig. 4). After the addition of ammonia, ,B-galactosidasespecific activity decreased steadily, indicating that gin!Ipromoter activity was lower when ammonia was available.

This conclusion is similar to that reached with B. japoni-cum (11), R. phaseoli (6), and Rhizobiium sp. strain ANU289(20). In all of these studies, GSII transferase activity de-creased after ammonia was added to glutamate-grown cul-tures. We also measured GS transferase activity in ourexperiments and found that although the pattern of ourresults was qualitatively similar to that seen with the 3-

galactosidase assays, the specific activity of GS variedsignificantly with the concentration of protein in the assay.We were therefore unable to quantitatively confirm theresults cited above.

Detection of the GSII protein in free-living cells and bac-teroids of R. meliloti. To study the level of GSII protein infree-living cells and bacteroids of R. meliloti, we purifiedGSII protein and used it to prepare anti-GSII antiserum.When this antiserum was used to stain Western blots, a band

at approximately 36 kilodaltons, the size of the GSII mono-mer (7, 11; Shatters and Kahn, in press), was visible inextracts prepared from glutamate-grown cultures of R. me-liloti 104A14 or GLN210 (glnA) but not cultures of WSU660(glnII) (Fig. 5). When 104A14 and GLN210 were grown onammonia as the nitrogen source, the intensity of this banddecreased substantially (data not shown). These data areconsistent with the results obtained with the ginII::lacZfusion.The anti-GSII antiserum was also used to probe Western

blots of crude extracts from alfalfa, soybean, and peanodules (Fig. 5). The serum reacts well with the GSIIproteins in these other bacteria, as would be expected fromthe stability of the DNA sequence (Shatters and Kahn, inpress). No band corresponding to GSII was detected in anyof the nodule extracts. Despite the high concentration ofprotein and antiserum used in this experiment, no band wasseen in the nodule extracts at 36 kilodaltons, althoughreaction of a minor component of the serum with otherbacterial proteins can be seen in both bacterial and nodulelanes. The bands between 60 and 66 kilodaltons also appearin the lane containing the molecular mass standards and aremost probably an artifact due to the presence of 3-mercap-toethanol (L. Thomashow, personal communication). Thelack of a detectable protein band at 36 kilodaltons in thenodule crude extracts agrees with results of previous workwith B. japonicuim, in which no GSII transferase activity

TABLE 2. Comparison of promoter sequences

Source Sequence" Reference

Proposed NtrA-binding site (ntr consensus)-24 -12

SUSb ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~IOverall consensus" TGG YAYNNNNNT TGC (A/T) 14Rhizobium nif consensus' Y TGG CAYGNNNNT TGC (A/T) 2B. japonicum ginII promoter T TGG CACGCTAAA TGC TT 7R. meliloti gin!! promoter" T TGG CACGTTTGA TGC TT This work

NRI (ntrC product)-binding siteOverall consensus' TGCACY NNNNN GGTGCA 3, 17B. japonicum glnII promoter -119 -103

TGCGCC GCTAT GACGCA 7R. meliloti glnII promoter -114 -98

AGCGCC ATCGT TGCGCA This workRhizobium gin!I promoter consensus NGCGCC NNNNT NRCGCA This work

Sequence is numbered starting at the site of initiation of transcription.b This sequence was deduced by comparing the -24 to -12 region of atir-regulated promoters from Klebsiella ptielinoniae, Salmtonella tiphimniuriirn, two

Azotobaciter species, Rhizobiium niif promoters, and two Pselidomollas species.The Rhizobium nif consensus was deduced by comparing 13 Rhizobiumn nif and fix promoters.

dThe R. meliloti ginlIl transcriptional start site has not been determined; this placement was assigned by using the consensus sequence for alignment.eThis sequence was deduced by comparing nttrC activated promoters in K. pneumtloniite, the rhizobia, and E. coli.

VOL. 171, 1989

on June 16, 2020 by guesthttp://jb.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 6: Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase Activity Rhizobium ... · Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase II Activity in Rhizobium meliloti 104A14 ROBERTG. SHATTERS,'tJOHNE. SOMERVILLE,2tANDMICHAELL.

5092 SHATTERS ET AL.

X0 4

o)20

2 4 6 6 10 12 14 16

Time (hours)FIG. 4. Effect of ammonia addition on P-galactosidase activity of

a glnlI-lacZ fusion protein. Two cultures each of R. meliloti 104A14and R. meliloti 104A14(pRS21-1) were grown to mid-log phase inminimal mannitol glutamate medium. At the time indicated by thearrow, NH4Cl was added to one culture of each strain to give a finalconcentration of 15 mM. Cultures were grown for a further 10 h, andsamples taken throughout this growth period were assayed forP-galactosidase activity. Miller units represent the rate of hydrolysisof ONPG normalized by the culture density. Symbols: O, R. meliloti104A14(pRS21-1) (glutamate only); +, R. meliloti 104A14(pRS21-1)(ammonium added); 0, R. meliloti 104A14 (glutamate only); U, R.meliloti 104A14 (ammonium added).

could be detected in isolated bacteroids (11), but it is difficultto reconcile with the results of Martin et al. (29), whorecently showed that high levels of glnII mRNA are presentin B. japonicum bacteroids isolated from soybean nodules. Itis possible that glnII is transcribed but not translated or thatGSII is not stable in nodules.

DISCUSSION

It has been suggested that the gin!! gene is regulated bynitrogen availability by using a regulatory system similar tothat of enteric bacteria. However, the most direct evidencethat NtrA is required in the expression of genes involved inintermediary nitrogen metabolism is that an R. meliloti ntrAmutant is unable to grow with nitrate as its sole nitrogensource (35). We have shown here that a functional R. melilotintrA gene is required for the expression of the R. melilotiGSII protein, that there is a potential ntr consensus se-quence and an NRI upstream activator sequence in the gin!Ipromoter region, that the glnII promoter is ntrA dependent,and that it is regulated in response to nitrogen availability.This is strong evidence that ntrA is required for the expres-sion of a gene involved in intermediary nitrogen metabolismin R. meliloti. Since ntrA was not required for the expressionof GSI, our ntrA mutant was not a glutamine auxotroph.The R. meliloti 104A14 ntrA mutant, WSU414, has the

same phenotypes attributed to a R. meliloti 1021 ntrA mutant(35). It forms Fix- nodules on alfalfa and is unable to growwith either succinate as a carbon source or nitrate as anitrogen source. Despite considerable sequence divergence,the gene we have mutated plays the same role as the R.meliloti 1021 ntrA gene. The Fix- phenotype was not causedby the glutamine auxotrophy of this strain, since neither

X.;

;.L

ro) r

FIG. 5. Immunological analysis of GSII expression. Crude ex-tracts prepared from glutamate-grown cultures of R. meliloti104A14, GLN210 ginA, and WSU660 glnIl; of B. japonicum BJ110;and of nodule tissue were prepared as described in Materials andMethods. Total protein from these extracts (75 p.g) was separated ona sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gel, and GSII wasdetected with antiserum (5). Labels: STD, molecular mass stan-dards; GLN660, WSU660; ALF., nodule extract from alfalfa inoc-ulated with R. meliloti 104A14; PEA, nodule extract from peainoculated with R. leguminosaruim 300; Bj. USDA 110, glutamate-grown B. japonicum BJ110; SOY., nodule extract from soybeaninoculated with B. japonickun BJ110; LEAF, extract from alfalfaleaves.

prototrophic revertants of WSU414 nor those of its gInA'derivative, WSU415, are effective.

Transcription of gin!I was affected by the form of nitrogenavailable. In experiments with anti-GSII antiserum, GSIIprotein levels were higher when glutamate was substitutedfor ammonia as the nitrogen source. In cells containing atranslational fusion that put E. coli lacZ under the control ofthe gln!I promoter, 3-galactosidase activity was high whenglutamate was the nitrogen source but low when ammoniawas present. After ammonia was added to glutamate-growncells containing the gene fusion, 3-galactosidase specificactivity decreased steadily. This decline is similar to thatseen when GSII enzymatic activity is assayed in response toammonia addition (6, 11, 20), but more directly indicates thatchanges in transcription are responsible for the decrease.The inability to detect GSII protein in nodules when using

antiserum against GSII suggests that GSII activity in thebacteroids is repressed either by low oxygen levels or by thepresence of ammonia. This result is consistent with previousresults showing low levels of GSII activity in nodules (10)and under microaerobic conditions (33), but, unless there isposttranscriptional regulation, it is not consistent with therecent report (29) that glnII is actively transcribed in nod-ules.

In our experiments, ntrA was needed for the expression ofglnII, a gene apparently repressed in bacteroids. It hadpreviously been shown that ntrA is needed for the expres-sion of dctA, a gene expressed in bacteroids (35). Since eachof these genes had an associated transcriptional activator,our results support the idea (31) that NtrA is a component ofthe transcriptional machinery used to recognize a subclass of

J. BACTERIOL.

on June 16, 2020 by guesthttp://jb.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 7: Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase Activity Rhizobium ... · Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase II Activity in Rhizobium meliloti 104A14 ROBERTG. SHATTERS,'tJOHNE. SOMERVILLE,2tANDMICHAELL.

GSII EXPRESSION IN R. MELILOTI 5093

genes involved in various metabolic pathways but does notitself sense the environmental signals.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the U.S. Department ofAgriculture Competitive Research Grants Office and from the Wash-ington Technology Center.We thank Jennifer Kraus for helpful advice, Mike Minnick for

help in preparing the antiserum, Linda Moore for editorial assis-tance, and Greg Martin for communicating his results prior topublication.

ADDENDUM IN PROOF

An expanded version of the work by Rossbach et al. (37)has been recently published by de Bruijn et al. (F. J. deBruijn, S. Rossbach, M. Schneider, P. Ratet, S. Messmer,W. W. Szeto, F. M. Ausubel, and J. Schell, J. Bacteriol.171:1673-1682, 1989).

LITERATURE CITED1. Adams, T. H., and B. K. Cheim. 1988. Effects of oxygen levels

on the transcription of nif and gln genes in Bradyrhizobiumjaponicum. J. Gen. Microbiol. 134:611-618.

2. Alvarez-Morales, A., and H. Hennecke. 1985. Expression ofRhizobiumjaponicum nipl and nifDK operons can be activatedby the Klebsiella pneumoniae nifA protein but not by theproduct of ntrC. Mol. Gen. Genet. 199:306-314.

3. Ames, G. F.-L., and K. Nikaido. 1985. Nitrogen regulation onSalmonella typhimurium. Identification of an ntrC protein-binding site and definition of a consensus binding sequence.EMBO J. 4:539-547.

4. Benson, S. A. 1984. A rapid procedure for isolation of DNAfragments from agarose gels. BioTechniques 1984:66-67.

5. Blake, M. S., K. H. Johnston, G. J. Russell-Jones, and E. C.Gotschlich. 1984. A rapid, sensitive method for detection ofalkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-antibody on Westernblots. Anal. Biochem. 136:175-179.

6. Bravo, A., and J. Mora. 1988. Ammonium assimilation inRhizobium phaseoli by the glutamine synthetase-glutamate syn-thase pathway. J. Bacteriol. 170:980-984.

7. Carlson, T. A., and B. Chelm. 1986. Apparent eukaryotic originof glutamine synthetase II from Bradyrhizobium japonicum.Nature (London) 322:568-570.

8. Carlson, T. A., M. L. Guerinot, and B. K. Chelm. 1985.Characterization of the gene encoding glutamine synthetase I(glnA) from Bradyrhizobium japonicum. J. Bacteriol. 162:698-703.

9. Carlson, T. A., G. B. Martin, and B. K. Chelm. 1987. Differen-tial transcription of the two glutamine synthetase genes ofBradyrhizobium japonicum. J. Bacteriol. 169:5861-5866.

10. Casadaban, M. J., A. Martinez-Arias, S. K. Shapira, and J.Chou. 1983. 13-Galactosidase gene fusions for analyzing geneexpression in Escherichia coli and yeast. Methods Enzymol.100:293-308.

11. Darrow, R. A. 1980. Role of glutamine synthetase in nitrogenfixation, p. 139-166. In J. Mora and R. Palacios (ed.), Glutaminesynthetase: metabolism, enzymology and regulation. AcademicPress, Inc., New York.

12. Darrow, R. A., and R. R. Knotts. 1977. Two forms of glutaminesynthetase in free-living root-nodule bacteria. Biochem.Biophys. Res. Commun. 78:554-559.

13. Devereux, J., P. Haeberli, and 0. Smithies. 1984. A comprehen-sive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. NucleicAcids Res. 12:387-395.

14. Dixon, R. 1986. The xylABC promoter from the Pseudomonasputida TOL plasmid is activated by the nitrogen regulatorygenes in Escherichia coli. Mol. Gen. Genet. 203:129-136.

15. Edmands, J., N. A. Noridge, and D. R. Benson. 1987. Theactinorrhizal root-nodule symbiont Frankia sp. strain Cpll hastwo glutamine synthetases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:

6126-6130.16. Fuchs, R. L., and D. L. Keister. 1980. Identification of two

glutamine synthetases in Agrobacterium. J. Bacteriol. 141:996-998.

17. Gussin, G. N., C. W. Ronson, and F. M. Ausubel. 1986.Regulation of nitrogen fixation genes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 20:567-591.

18. Hirschman, J., P.-K. Wong, K. Sei, J. Keener, and S. Kustu.1985. Products of nitrogen regulatory genes ntrA and ntrC ofenteric bacteria activate glnA transcription in vitro: evidencethat the ntrA product is a sigma factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 82:7525-7529.

19. Hunt, T. P., and B. Magasanik. 1985. Transcription of glnA bypurified Escherichia coli components: core RNA polymeraseand the products of gInF, glnG, and glnL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 82:8453-8457.

20. Howitt, S., and P. Gresshoff. 1985. Ammonia regulation ofglutamine synthetase in Rhizobium sp. ANU289. J. Gen. Micro-biol. 131:1733-1740.

21. Johnston, A. W. B., and J. E. Beringer. 1975. Identification ofthe Rhizobium strains in pea root nodules using genetic mark-ers. J. Gen. Microbiol. 87:343-350.

22. Kahn, M., R. Kolter, C. Thomas, D. Figurski, R. Meyer, E.Remaut, and D. R. Helinski. 1979. Plasmid cloning vehiclesderived from plasmids ColEl, F, R6K and RK2. MethodsEnzymol. 68:268-280.

23. Kahn, M. L., and C. R. Timblin. 1984. Gene fusion vehicles forthe analysis of gene expression in Rhizobium meliloti. J. Bac-teriol. 158:1070-1077.

24. Kustu, S., K. Sei, and J. Keener. 1986. Nitrogen regulation inenteric bacteria, p. 139-154. In I. Booth and C. F. Higgins (ed.),Regulation of gene expression-25 years on. Cambridge Uni-versity Press, New York.

25. Ludwig, R. A. 1978. Control of ammonium assimilation inRhizobium 32H1. J. Bacteriol. 135:114-123.

26. Ludwig, R. A. 1980. Physiological role of glutamine synthetaseI and II in ammonium assimilation in Rhizobium sp. 32H1. J.Bacteriol. 141:1209-1216.

27. MacNeil, T., D. MacNeil, and B. Tyler. 1982. Fine-structuredeletion map and complementation analysis of the glnA-g1nL-glnG region in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 150:1302-1313.

28. Magasanik, B. 1982. Genetic control of nitrogen assimilation inbacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet. 16:135-168.

29. Martin, G. B., K. C. Chapman, and B. Chelm. 1988. Role of theBradyrhizobium japonicum ntrC gene product in differentialregulation of the glutamine synthetase II gene (glnII). J. Bacte-riol. 170:5452-5459.

30. Ninfa, A. J., and B. Magasanik. 1986. Covalent modification ofthe glnG product, NRI, by the glnL product, NRII, regulatestranscription of the glnALG operon in Escherichia coli. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:5909-5913.

31. Nixon, B. T., C. W. Ronson, and F. M. Ausubel. 1986. Twocomponent regulatory systems responsive to environmentalstimuli share strongly conserved domains with the nitrogenassimilation regulatory genes ntrB and ntrC. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. USA 83:7850-7854.

32. Norrander, J., T. Kempe, and J. Messing. 1983. Improved M13vectors using oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis. Gene 26:101-106.

33. Rao, V. R., R. A. Darrow, and D. L. Keister. 1978. Effect ofoxygen tension on nitrogenase and on glutamine synthetase Iand II in Rhizobium japonicum 61A76. Biochem. Biophys. Res.Commun. 81:224-231.

34. Reitzer, L. J., and B. Magasanik. 1986. Transcription of ginA inEscherichia coli is stimulated by activator bound to sites farfrom the promoter. Cell 45:785-792.

35. Ronson, C. W., T. B. Nixon, L. M. Albright, and F. M. Ausubel.1987. Rhizobium meliloti ntrA (rpoN) gene is required fordiverse metabolic functions. J. Bacteriol. 169:2424-2431.

36. Rossbach, S., J. Schell, and F. J. de Bruijn. 1988. Cloning andanalysis of Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 loci involved inglutamine biosynthesis: neither the ginA (GSI) nor the ginII(GSII) gene plays a special role in virulence. Mol. Gen. Genet.

VOL. 171, 1989

on June 16, 2020 by guesthttp://jb.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from

Page 8: Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase Activity Rhizobium ... · Regulation ofGlutamine Synthetase II Activity in Rhizobium meliloti 104A14 ROBERTG. SHATTERS,'tJOHNE. SOMERVILLE,2tANDMICHAELL.

5094 SHATTERS ET AL.

212:38-47.37. Rossbach, S., M. Schneider, J. Schell, and F. J. de Bruijn. 1988.

Characterization of different glutamine synthetase genes of theRhizobiaceae and their role in N-assimilation and plant-bacterialinteractions, p. 383. In H. Bothe, F. J. de Bruijn, and W. E.Newton (ed.), Nitrogen fixation: hundred years after. GustavFischer, New York.

38. Somerville, J. E., and M. L. Kahn. 1983. Cloning of theglutamine synthetase I gene from Rhizobiumn meliloti. J. Bacte-riol. 156:168-176.

38a.Somerville, J. E., R. G. Shatters, and M. L. Kahn. 1989.

Isolation, characterization, and complementation of Rhizobiumineliloti 10A14 mutants that lack glutamine synthetase ll activ-ity. J. Bacteriol. 171:5079-5086.

39. Szeto, W. W., B. T. Nixon, C. W. Ronson, and F. M. Ausubel.1987. Identification and characterization of the Rhizobium me-

liloti ntrC gene: R. meliloti has separate pathways for activationof nitrogen fixation genes in free-living and symbiotic cells. J.Bacteriol. 169:1423-1432.

40. Williams, S. A., B. E. Slatko, L. S. Moran, and S. M. DeSimone.1986. Sequencing in the fast lane: a rapid protocol for [o-35S]-dATP dideoxy DNA sequencing. BioTechniques 4:138-147.

J. BACTERIOL.

on June 16, 2020 by guesthttp://jb.asm

.org/D

ownloaded from