Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

30
Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks Lars M. Ramström Institute for tobacco studies Stockholm, Sweden ICAA Venice 2004

description

Oral presentation by Lars Ramström at the 47th International ICAA Conference on Dependencies, Venice, Italy November, 2004

Transcript of Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Page 1: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible

reduction of health risks

Lars M. RamströmInstitute for tobacco studies

Stockholm, Sweden

ICAA Venice 2004

Page 2: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Regulation of

amounts of various constituents in cigarette smoke

Page 3: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

To be meaningful from health point of view, regulation of smoke constituents should

relate, not to machine yield, but to smokers’ intake, taking into

account the interaction between the smoker and the product.

Page 4: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Jarvis MJ, Boreham R, Primatesta P, Feyerabend C, Bryant A. Nicotine yield from machine-smoked cigarettes and nicotine intakes in smokers: evidence from a representative population survey.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jan 17;93(2):134-8.

Page 5: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks
Page 6: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1

Nicotine yield (mg) - LGC 42

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Sa

liv

a c

oti

nin

e (

ng

/ml)

Saliva cotinine by brand nicotine yield in 2031 smokerof 0+ cigarettes per day: HSE 1998

Cotinine=173.5+138.7 (nicotine yield); r=.19, r²=.034

Nic

oti

ne

in

take

pe

r d

ay (

mg

) 63

56

49

42

35

28

21

14

7

0

From: Jarvis et el 2001

Page 7: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

SMOKING HUMAN MACHINE SMOKER

PHYSICAL Fixed by Varying, accordingPARAMETERS protocol to smokers’(puff volume (=same for all adaptation toetc) cigarettes) cigarette

characteristics

NICOTINE Varying, Fixed,DELIVERY depending on (= the amount

cigarette needed by the characteristics smoker),

independent ofcigarettecharacteristics

Page 8: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

InI2001, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) published Monograph 13

Page 9: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Monograph 13 concluded: “Measurements of tar and nicotine yields using the FTC method do not offer smokers meaningful information on the amount of tar and nicotine they will receive from a cigarette.”

and therefore asked for: “Measurement of constituent yields in a manner that more closely resembles the way smokers actually consume cigarettes.”

Page 10: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

But, there is no such thing as ”the (one and only) way smokers actually consume cigarettes” because:

• Different smokers use different ways to smoke the same cigarette

• Each individual smoker uses different ways to smoke different cigarettes

Page 11: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

What is it that determines an individual smoker’s intake ?

Nicotine: His personal need for nicotine (that governs the way

he smokes in order to get the amount he needs). This intake is NOT essentially brand-related.

Any other substance, for example ”Tar”: The amount of ”Tar” that in the smoke of the brand

accompanies the smoker’s personal intake of nicotine.

This intake IS brand-related, since it is influenced by the smoke composition (expressed by the proportion between the amount of ”Tar” and the amount of Nicotine, the Tar/Nicotine (T/N) ratio, for the brand).

Page 12: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Is the T/N ratio (or an other such ratio) a fixed brand characteristic?

The smoke composition does vary to some extent depending on the way the cigarette is smoked. However, the variation among all smokers except some very few, is small enough to be unimportant for brand comparison purposes.

Consequently, an acceptable T/N ratio could be derived from the machine yield measures.

Page 13: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

EXAMPLE

A smoker’s intake of tar =

machine yield of tar= his nicotine intake × machine yield of nicotine

Amount of nicotine Tar/Nicotine ratio

determined by determined by the smoker brand properties

Page 14: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Example of brand comparisonBrand (1999 market)

Emission to ISO smoke machine

Average intake by smokers

Status by Current EU rule

Spar Light (Germany) - Nicotine - Tar

(T/N ratio

0.3 mg 6 mg 20)

≈1.2 mg** ≈ 24 mg

Permitted

Right Filter (Sweden) - Nicotine - Tar

(T/N ratio

1.2 mg 10 mg ≈ 8)

≈ 1.3 mg** ≈ 10.4 mg

Forbidden

**According to Jarvis et al 2001

Page 15: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Example of rule in an ”intake-related” regulation of cigarette smoke constituents.

T/N ratio <10 (and, optionally,

Machine yield of tar <12 mg

Machine yield of nicotine <1.4 mg)

Page 16: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Example of brand comparisonBrand (1999 market)

Emission to ISO smoke machine

Average intake by smokers

Status Current EU rule

by: Rule related to intake *

Spar Light (Germany) - Nicotine - Tar

(T/N ratio

0.3 mg 6 mg 20)

≈1.2 mg** ≈ 24 mg

Permitted

Forbidden

Right Filter (Sweden) - Nicotine - Tar

(T/N ratio

1.2 mg 10 mg ≈ 8)

≈ 1.3 mg** ≈ 10.4 mg

Forbidden

Permitted

* T/N ratio <10 (and, optionally: **According to Machine yield of tar <12 mg Jarvis et al, 2001 Machine yield of nicotine <1.4 mg)

Page 17: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Summary Regulation of amounts of smoke constituents

• A smokers’ intake of nicotine is about the same from all cigarettes and can therefore not be effectively influenced by limits for machine yield of nicotine.

• A smokers’ intake of other smoke constituents can be reduced by setting limits for the ratio between yield of certain substances and the yield of nicotine.

Page 18: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Regulation of

information on packages regarding smoke constituents

Page 19: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Health-related purpose of consumer info on cigarette packages:

To help the smoker minimize his intake of harmful smoke constituents.

Therefore, info should be related to potential INTAKE.

Consequently, machine yield figures are meaningless.

Page 20: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Machine yield figures on packages are even MISLEADING, since their appearence gives the FALSE impression that:

- nicotine intake were determined by cigarette properties and differing widely between different brands but independent of how you smoke.

- low figures for a substance, e.g. tar, would

indicate low intake of that substance i.e. ”This is a mild cigarette”.

Page 21: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Instead, smokers should be aware...

- that they are themselves influencing their intake by the way they smoke

- that the self-determined intake of nicotine is about the same from all cigarettes

- that the intake of other substances

is influenced also by cigarette properties (yield ratio to nicotine)

Page 22: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Possible model for a meaningful and truthful info box on packages:

Nicotine delivery from one of these cigarettes - to a smoking machine (ISO standard): 0.6 mg - to a smoker: 0.1 – 2.0 mg depending on how it is smoked

Every milligram of nicotine is accompanied by: Tar: 8 mg Carbon monoxide: 9 mg

Page 23: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Summary Regulation of information on packages

• Machine yield figures as displayed by current EU (and other) regulations are not only meaningless but misleading.

• Smokers should be informed that their intake of…- nicotine can be varied in a wide range by themselves depending on the way they smoke, but not very much by the choice of cigarette brand.- other substances is influenced by cigarette properties (brand-specific amount of various substances per unit of nicotine) so that choice of brand may help reduce intake of other substances.

Page 24: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Regulation of

smokefree tobacco products

Page 25: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Mean nitrosamine content of moist snuff products from various sources based on dry weight

Country Brand (yr sampled)

NNKµg/g

NNNµg/g

Total TSNAµg/g

Sweden Ettan snus (2000) 0.5 1.1 2.8

Sudan (Toombak) 3 samples (1993)

188- -362

241- -369

United States Skoal (2000) Copenhagen (2000)

4.33.4

20.814.3

64.041.1

Page 26: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

BangladeshIndia

PakistanSudan

UKSweden

0,0

2,5

5,0

7,5

10,0

Source: GLOBOCAN 2000: Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide, .IARC CancerBase No. 5. Lyon, IARCPress, 2001

Cancer of oral cavity, males all agesAge standardized (World) mortality rates per 100,000

Page 27: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

UK EDITION Thursday, 1 June, 2000

Minorities warned over oral cancer

People from ethnic minorities should have regular checks because many are at greater risk of oral cancer, say dentists.

This is because of the popularity of chewing tobacco and betel quids, a mixture of tobacco, leaves and spices, among the south Asian community.

Page 28: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

UK EDITION Monday, 3 March, 2003

Oral cancer fear for Asians As many as 600 million people around the world could protect themselves from cancer if they stopped chewing tobacco. However, many are not aware of the risks associated with the habit, which is popular in south Asia and among ethnic groups in the West.

Page 29: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Gothiatek standard Voluntary market based toxicity standard used for snus products by Swedish Match Tobacco Company. ___________________________________________________________________________

Toxin Limit _ Nitrate 3.5mg/kg Tobacco Specific Nitrosamines (TSNA)

5 mg/kg

N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) 5 µg/kg Benz(a)pyrene (BaP) 10 µg/kg Cadmium 0.5 mg/kg Lead 1.0 mg/kg Arsenic 0.25 mg/kg Nickel 2.25 mg/kg Chromium 1.5 mg/kg µg = microgram or 10-6g. mg/kg ~ parts per million (ppm). µg/kg is equivalent to parts per billion (ppb). Limits based on 50% water content – double the limits for dry weight equivalents.

Page 30: Regulation of tobacco ingredients for largest possible reduction of health risks

Summary Regulation of smokefree products

• Regulations must recognize the very large differences in toxicity between different smokefree products and aim at eliminating from the market those who carry serious health risks rahter than those who do not.

• There are examples of standards that can serve as models for designing meaningful regulations.